« Obama-Backing SEIU Hits Hillary In Tough Last-Minute Iraq Mailer | Home | AFSCME's Hillary Leaflet -- Brought To You By "Your Union" »

Yet Another Hillary Ad Hits Obama Over Gas Tax

Hillary goes up in Indiana and North Carolina with yet another negative spot hitting Obama for not supporting the gas tax holiday...

"Barack Obama wants you to keep paying; $8 billion in all," the ad's narrator says. "Hillary is the one who gets it."

It quotes a voter saying: "Hillary Clinton is the candidate that is going to fight for working people."

In purely political terms, Hillary's gas tax holiday has never really been about gas tax relief itself. Rather, it's real goal was to implicitly make the case -- by suggesting she would take some kind of action, however dubious on the merits -- that she's the candidate who's in touch with voters' economic distress.

Indeed, Hillary chief strategist Geoff Garin insisted recently that the campaign's internal polling showed that this message was getting through.

Separately, on the conference call earlier today, Hillary spokesperson Howard Wolfson was asked if the campaign would continue hitting the gas tax theme. He said they would for the foreseeable future. So get ready for lots more of this.

Full ad script after the jump.

[Announcer]: What has happened to Barack Obama?

Woman: Right now we are living paycheck to paycheck.

[Announcer]: He is attacking Hillary's plan to give you a break on gas prices because he doesn't have one.

Man: The price of gas is going up.

Woman: It's hard to fill up the tank.

[Announcer]: Hillary wants the oil companies to pay for the gas tax this summer - so you don't have to.

[Announcer]: Barack Obama wants you to keep paying; $8 billion in all. Hillary is the one who gets it.

Man: Hillary Clinton is the candidate that is going to fight for working people.

I am Hillary Clinton and I approve this message.


153 Comments

| Leave a comment

They painted themselves into this.
Obama and others have been hitting them on this.
Clinton has no choice but to go down with her stupid idea.

Clinton has no choice but to go down with her stupid idea.

Another page out of the Karl Rove/George W. Bush playbook -- make the wrong choice and stick with it no matter the facts, no matter what.

Live by the stupid, die by the stupid

The four Nobel prize winners at the top of this petition of 221 economists who agree with Obama are further proof that Obama is an elitist.

http://gastax08.blogspot.com/2008/05/open-letter-from-economists-opposing.html

Thank God Hillary will never read that petition. Too much head, not enough heart. And facts have a well known Obama bias. Did you know there are more nerve endings in your gut than in your head? Look it up!

I notice they don't address her excess or windfall profits tax on the revenue of the oil companies. I wonder why?

You think maybe they want to keep the government out of the oil companies' business? God knows, I'm not a nobel prize winning anything, but I find it really strange that they act like the oil companies would get to keep any profits they make by raising the price of gasoline. I'm no Nobel prize winner, but shouldn't they really say something like the oil companies will raise prices and make more profits and she'll tax those profits away and even more money will go into the highway fund? Worst case? And if they don't raise prices because she's just going to take that profit away anyway, well then the consumers do get some relief while the highway fund gets just as much money as it would have anyway.

Hey! I just looked at that list. Stiglitz and the Chicago School? You know who those guys are? They have a big time "market economy" bias.

And Brookings? Have they endorsed anyone? Aren't they pretty conservative?

Brookings is a center-left think tank. They don't endorse politicains.

Joe Stiglitz is a progressive. He wrote Globalization and Its Discontents, among other things. Not every single person associated with Chicago is a Friedmanite.

You don't really know what you're talking about on this one. I'd do some googling.

No. I know a lot about what I'm talking about. Let's debate it if you feel up to it.

Meet me at my comment down thread.

Maybe it's because, oops, Hillary already promised to spend that windfall tax on alternative energy. Or perhaps it's because she's proposing the gas tax holiday for THIS summer and there is no way that the windfall tax will get past George Bush. So that money that is not going into the Highway Fund THIS summer causes NC alone to lose an estimated 7000 jobs, while we wait around for a new president who might sign the windfall tax proposal, but, by then the need will be greater as the infrastructure will be worse off from the neglect and the economy will be worse because of all those newly unemployed.

And if she's tying the holiday to the tax? What then, genius?

Well, then I suppose it wouldn't matter so much that it's a stupid idea that wouldn't work, since it would never pass and would never get signed. So I guess that would make it brilliant? Is that how it works, Einstein?

Way too negative, man. Of course it won't work if we don't support her. Nothing either of our candidates want to do can be done without our support. If we get behind her she can do this. Since when do Progressives take the side of the oil companies in a fight?

Obama is submitting a bill that will ask Iraq to become stable and violence free before Memorial Day. What? You don't think it happen? How negative. I guess you don't want peace in Iraq.

It's also about as realistic as Hillary's "bill" if it includes the windfall tax (it's not out on Thomas yet, but her rhetoric makes it sound like she'll worry about that part later) and about as realistic as her statement, "We won't let OPEC be a cartel anymore."

But the point is, throwing these bills out as an election eve gimick t(hat you know will not get passed) makes it HARDER to pursue these things in a measured, more cooperative, serious fashion--not that I think dismantling OPEC is a serious possibility, ever.

Maybe because the opinion on that is more varied, and they wanted to keep the message to a simple one everyone could agree on? My understanding is that a windfall profits tax doesn't necessarily get allocated to the highway fund, so maybe that's related, too; but I'm just guessing there.

I'm guessing the Congress can allocate the tax wherever they want to. The point is, leaving the windfall profits aspect out is misleading and they are doing that on purpose. They're not distinguishing between Clinton's proposal and McCain's. I wonder why.

user-pic

Really? I don't. This is a snow job, and the sheeples are bleating.

hi workerbee,

can you clarify your comment? who are the sheep? i'm being serious here, and i'd love to hear your perspective. i haven't yet heard a viable argument in favor of this gas tax holiday, but if there is one that i'm blind to or haven't figured out yet, i want to know!

user-pic

Good evening, ma'am.

The thing is, The current sitting president is against it. The think tanks are against it. Congress is against it, the MSM is against it.

So I think to myself, "self, the last time we saw an all out information blitz like this was over the war," and I think to myself, I was smarter than them.I marched against it and I was right.

I think Obama got it wrong on healthcare, so it wouldn't surprise me if he got it wrong here. (It won't stop me voting for him in November, but I might actually, physically, have to hold my nose.)

I see Exxon-Mobile broke another record with an 11 billion quarterly proifit, (not exactly widely reported, mind you) but those oil company friendly folks sure are yelling at Hillary for threatening them with a bat, and I says to myself, "self? She's taken a page out of John Edwards notebook, she's gonna use it on these obscene oil companies, and ain't it about fucking time someone did?"

Hillary's tax holiday ain't about the .18¢ a gallon. It's about a war tax. A historic tax we've always had in times of war to prevent profiteering and the appearance of the poor going off to fight for the interests of the rich. (Like we have now.)

It isn't much, nor is it enough, but it's a start.

That tax will pay for 3 months fed tax holiday for some folks I know that are hurting, and beyond.

I'd like to see it fund a new GI bill. And the VA.

If you tax the excess profits of the oil companies, they'll have no reason to raise prices. unless they feel a little guilty. I doubt that.

Am I arguing for a gas tax holiday? No, not really. I'm arguing for the excess (war) profits tax, which is historically and patriotically proper.

Am I arguing for a gas tax holiday? No, not really. I'm arguing for the excess (war) profits tax, which is historically and patriotically proper.

Aha! Thank you. That makes sense now. The gas tax holiday I still don't get, but I see your point now.

Hillary's tax holiday ain't about the .18¢ a gallon. It's about a war tax. A historic tax we've always had in times of war to prevent profiteering and the appearance of the poor going off to fight for the interests of the rich. (Like we have now.)

But my understanding is that Obama also favors a windfall profits tax (or is that not what you're talking about)? How is Clinton's plan different from Obama's in this regard? Or is it more that you don't think Obama will follow through?

Personally, I'd love to gas tax raised in some form -- whether at the pump or directly on oil company profits -- because I'm convinced that the only way we'll ever be able to revamp our infrastructure is if gas becomes expensive enough that it's in our national (and local) interest to do so. I think that gasoline, right now, is under-priced because there's no real economic cost associated with the environmental damage that gasoline production and consumption cause. In other words, that the reason US oil companies are so profitable is that we (as a country) have been artificially depressing gas prices for too long.

So, all that said, my assessment of Clinton's over-all plan is that prices at the pump would just rise back to customary rates (because the supply of gas is static in the near-term), and that an excess profit tax would return the $8-10 billion back to the government sometime next year. In which case, the net impact for consumers is nothing, the net impact for federal funding is a delay, and the net impact for oil companies is a short term loan. (And if, somehow, congress is able to pass an excess profit tax along with a gas tax holiday, then the result is a net impact of 0 across the board, except for the additional work required to change the tax system.)

I'm no economist, so please correct me if I'm wrong on any of these points! And thanks for your thoughts, bee!

What the gas tax holiday gives her is a populist proposal to get her fight for an excess profits tax and greater transparency for the oil industry off the ground. She's using the holiday to marshall public opinion and frame the debate. Are you with the oil companies or the people? What I can't figure out is how Axelrod and Obama ended up on the other side of the argument. Bottom line. She said she'd take the oil companies on and she's doing it.

Why associate a serious goal--the windfall tax--with a pandering useless and discredited gimick--the gas tax holiday? Couldn't she just propose the windfall tax and still frame it as a fight against big oil without undermining her own effort by attaching it to a gimmick that everyone thinks is a dumb idea?

I know you desperately want to see this as a brilliant move on her part, but here's what it really is: a gimmick she thought would be easy points for her, and that she thought Obama would jump on the bandwagon for. Instead, he raised the discourse and counted on the American people to understand that "doing something" is not a good thing if that "something" is harmful and wasteful and pointless. Now she knows she's on the wrong side, but like George Bush, she doesn't know how to do anything but dig her heels in and say, "My voodoo economics will work and anything else is elitist."

I'm with Hillary on this one. I just found out I need some transmission work on my car and I could really use that $8 billion.

user-pic

This post, with this avatar, is hilarious. Thanks for the laugh!

This ad is just plain sad.

Okay, does anyone think that the DNC is going to give her the nomination after she's shown she can't beat an upstart Senator who had to build his organization from the ground up....

Does anyone really think the DNC will overturn the pledged delegate leader and vote to instill her on August 28, the 40th Anniversary of MLK's "I Have a Dream Speech"?

Anyone?

(Sound of crickets chirping drowns out the shrieks of gotalife, matt weaver, Richmond, otto, and others too numerous and sundry to name....)

Actually, 'I Have a Dream' was August 28, 1963..not 1968...lol But I still like your argument.

There is still the matter of a broken federal system. Obama's populist (and ergo legitimate) wave is about to hit a Federal wall that has been deaf to The People after three years of negative polling, and a sweep election in 2006, including many Democrats.

Watching the deep denial, I give it a solid 60% chance Sen Clinton will take this court before it's done, DNC be damned.

Pax,
M.

It really depends. I wish I had the certitude of this crowd, one way or the other. I do think that if the polls at the time of the Convention UNIFORMLY show that BO would lose to McCain by 15-20 points, there will be a crisis, and possibly a floor fight -- one that BOTH HRC and BO might lose. Ever wonder why John Edwards is on the sidelines? He is a plausible dark horse. I still think he is a great man, a great son of the South, and a great candidate. His wife is fantastic. Faced with very long odds, BO (being a politician) might opt out for the sake of "party unity' (a/k/a political survival in 2012). On the other hand, HRC's greatest strength (and one of the reasons she has such a devoted following) is her "true grit" (as Morning Joe puts it), and she will fight until the end. If the polls UNIFORMLY show her beating Sen. McCain by 15-20 (with BO losing by 15-20), she is a very strong contender, regardless of the pledged delegates (who can always change their mind).

I know that all of you folks have a crystal ball, and there is only one politician in it, but there are a few twists and turns left. All roads do not lead to BO.

All semblance of honesty and substance has been subsumed by political expedience in the Hillary campaign. Thank goodness I will never be forced to hold my nose and vote for this woman.

This idea and the shrillness of its promotion are proof conclusive that the Clinton campaign is about one thing and one thing only - Hillary wants to be President so badly, she is not only willing to damage her political party but also the nation to get there.

I hope with all the hope I have that we never, ever see a Clinton or a Bush in the white House again. Both families have no respect for the USA, but they sure do for the power rush (and lining their pockets).

"In purely political terms, Hillary's gas tax holiday has never really been about gas tax relief itself. Rather, it's real goal was to implicitly make the case -- by suggesting she would take some kind of action, however dubious on the merits -- that she's the candidate who's in touch with voters' economic distress."

I'm sorry, but I don't get how you write paragraph without some kind of background. who said this? the clinton campaign?

seriously, I don't understand. I'm not a reporter, but how do you know this is the goal? and if it is, isn't this 'means-to-an-end' a bigger story than you're allowing here?

user-pic

Greg, Eric - Obama picked up 2 more supers today. Any chance on getting a post about this?

http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/05/obama_picks_up_maryland_superd.html

I know you love to breathlessly post any kind of bullshit coming out of Garin's and Wolfson's asses, but this is news, don't you think? On the eve of the primaries in NC and Indiana he picks up 3 supers?????

Damn you are fired up today, Carol. I am sensing that you are pretty much fed up.

The mere fact that someone with such a nice smile is so exercised just makes me realize how frigging ridiculous and desperate Hillary is sounding at this point, and how eager the MSM (and TPM it seems) is eager to keep the drama alive.

user-pic

I am fired up. The coverage on this site for the past few weeks has been so one-sided and biased that it's disheartening. I mean, at least sites like TaylorMarsh and TalkLeft make no bones about their bias, and so I don't visit those sites. But here, it's more insidious - Greg and Eric just don't post stuff that they deem "unimportant", and so we have to ferret out the stuff ourselves. I have this extraordinarily heightened sense of "fairness" (I always have, ever since I was a child), and this just reeks of unfairness and imbalance. I feel the same way about the way Hillary has run her campaign - dirty pool has never sat well with me!

Don't you know, it's always the ones with the "nice smiles" that you gotta watch out for LOL!! ;)

Fired up! Ready to go!

Kill 'em with a smile, I say.

As far as TPM goes, I think they just fall prey to the same problem that afflicts the MSN, they want to be relevant, and covering a live story. If the news is that Obama has this thing sewn up, we can all turn off our laptops and go to the beach until September. This is self preservation at work, conscious or unconscious, the coverage will be slanted toward the dramatic.

I'd like to give them the benefit of the doubt, and assume it is unconscious, but we have to "call 'em as we see 'em".

Obama thought the gas taxes were a good idea until he didn't think they were a good idea. Obama is out of touch with the working people who make this country run.

user-pic

LOLOL! Obama voted for the gas tax holiday - and then came to the belief that it was the wrong thing to do because it WAS PROVEN THAT IT DIDN'T WORK!!! He actually learned from the past and took that experience to make his current judgment. How refreshing.

By the same token and to rebut your argument, Clinton opposed the gas tax holiday in 2000 (as did her husband, then President Clinton). They knew then that it wouldn't work - what changed her mind now? Why is she ignoring the advice of every economist on this issue? Shamless pandering, that's all it is - pure and simple.

Furthermore, Bob Dole ran against Bill with this stupid idea in 1996.

Bob Dole later dropped the idea when he revamped his economic platform.

Jeez, I wonder why.

Hillary dumber than Bob Dole.

Listen. If you can show me that Bob Dole ever proposed a windfall or excess profits tax on the oil industry when he was running against Clinton, I'll yeild to your superior wisdom and I'll eat my words. If you can't show me that, eat yours!

Umm, not quite.

Obama thought they were a good idea until they were enacted in his home state and he witnessed first-hand that the consumer saw no reduction in price.

It's called learning from past mistakes. Something George Bush (and Hillary, apparently) equate with weakness or flip-flopping.

Please, sign me up for 4 more years of that!

You're too quick, Carol.

user-pic

Hey, gotta stay on top of these things, ya know? ;)

Did Obama witness a windfall or excess profits tax along with that gas tax holiday in his home state? Let's keep it apples to apples. You're a reasonable person. I know you wouldn't want to compare two proposals that weren't the same and say they were. Would you? Not even if it made Obama look right when he's wrong? I don't think you'll do that. Others around here might. But you don't argue that way. I know I'll get a square deal from you.

user-pic

Nah, it ain't the normal working person. It's the congenital idiots that Obama is out of touch with. Only a congenital idiot would believe this moronic crap about a "gas tax" suspension.

Not only does the gas tax attract the morons, congenital idiots and total bozos, but it is a TOTAL INSULT. If you are not a moron, then here's my question: Why are you selling your vote for the price of a bag of potato chips? You must hate yourself to place such a ridiculous value on your vote.

if you want to buy my vote, it takes more than a bag of potato chips.

user-pic

That is what the Oil companies say.

You sound juuust like them.

You wouldn't be a chump, though. Not you.

user-pic

this could actually help hillary if the supers decide that ability to pander is the most important quality in a nominee. otherwise, not.

user-pic

If you watch the replay of HRC and Wolfson's appearances on Morning Joe this morning, it's abundantly clear that their polling on this shows that it's still an issue that they think will compel some voters to their side, but also that Obama's counter advertising is working and working well.

Both went to great lengths to make a two-pronged argument:
1. This is a short-term stop-gap solution; Obama voted for it in IL, too!
2. Don't forget we also have a comprehensive energy plan!

Obama's ads contrasts their gimmick with his blueprint for energy independence or whatever he calls it; clearly this message is working or else Clinton and Wolfson would just take the simpler path of attacking Obama's opposition to the gas tax rather than defending their own position in a way that's far more nuanced than anything else out of their campaign.

The interesting thing is Clinton's been hitting this issue about 800% times harder than McCain, but McCain seems sure to benefit in stature as much as Clinton from the framing here among anyone these ads actually connect with. Once again, the Clinton campaign lands on a strategy that in the end is not practically getting Clinton closer to a nomination, but may do a bit of long-term good for the McCain campaign...

user-pic

Excellent analysis, mcc! You are exactly right. She is despicable. In some ways she reminds me so much of GW - clinging to her decisions stubbornly in the face of overwhelming evidence that they are the wrong decisions. We certainly don't need another President like that!

True, but by September, summer is over and this Gas Tax Holiday nonsense will be forgotten. The potential damage to Obama generally still remains though.

Now that you mention it, I wonder if McCain will pick up Clinton's "I'll tell you what, I'm not going to put my lot in with economists" ploy and run with it. McCain's reportedly not very big on economics anyway; being able to brush off anything about economics he doesn't understand as "elitist" would be potentially useful from his perspective.

It's really interesting. She needs to bring some Institutional Economists into the debate. They know how prices really get set.

Bring it Hillary, it will be the rope you end up hanging yourself with in the end:

http://www.thepersonalispolitical.com/2008/05/hillary-attacks-democrats-and-experts.html

Oh yeah, and the most recent poll shows the majority of voters see it for a political gimmick. So keep it up!

She has been out front hammering Obama with Right wing talking points from the beginning....Commander in Chief Test, "Jesse Jackson" in SC, Elitist, etc.

She has been running the Republicans plays for them, and McCain doesn't even have to get dirty. Thanks, Hill. Really.

Billionaires would also get the same 18 cents tax relief from Hillary. She feels the pain of all those struggling Billionaires.

user-pic

Would the tax holiday apply to jet fuel?

Announcer]: Hillary wants the oil companies to pay for the gas tax this summer - so you don't have to.

Hillary: in the fall and winter, you will have to resume paying those taxes at the pump. I know that you will then have to pay for back to school expenses, and very high heating costs, but by then your primary will be over, so Screw You Then!!!

Hillary the Pander Bear stikes again.

She went after Bush because he didn't listen to experts and now she's doing the same thing. She doesn't need experts--Hillary knows best.

If she got the nomination, the Republicans would have a field day with her. She really can't stand the heat. She says she can, she may even think she can, but she can't. Obama has much more grace under fire than she does.

I hear she copped one of McCain's songs, too...bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran.

What are the customs for a Gas Tax Holiday?

Do we hang stockings? Decorate a tree? Who's coming down the chimney, Santa or Hillary?

Help me out. I want to be ready.

Don't know about the Gas Tax Panda?

She is faster than a speeding bullet in Tuzla, stronger than a magnet made in China, an has more balls than the lotto machine.

If you don't beleive she owed her due, she will eat her own.

Everyone puts up a cardboard cut-out of Hillary. Then you spray it with cheap gasoline and light it on fire while singing "nah nah nah nah, nah nah nah nah, hey hey hey, goodbye"

The Pander Bear will come to your house! All will get a bright orange baby carrot, hung with string from stick, the stick jutting out from a head band.

Oh, how much fun it will be, chasing that carrot!

user-pic

I guess you'd know. The only ones that are pandering are the oil companies and think tanks.

They, however, thank you for your support.

Stay away from their obscene blood soaked profits. There IS no man behind the curtain.

Want an elite to tow the line? Just tell them they're "smarter" than everyone else.

Works every time.

I can't wait for Obama's response #4!

OBAMA: Mention the $10 BILLION boost it would give to the oil companies she keeps saying she is "taking on"!

Well that's the thing, consumption taxes are by their very nature regressive. The people at the top will benefit from any real lowering of gas prices (although I agree that the practical impact will be nothing) just like the other 99.5% of us Americans. The difference is they are, in general, driving up per capita consumption, causing this very problem.

What's troubling is HRC's drastic and dramatic tack to the right and the extreme right at that. Her statement on Sunday seems to indicate a "W" style of decision making. Coupled with her statements about Iran, she is making a pretty good point that while she has 35 years of experience, she lacks the sound judgment to lead.

Didn't we get into this mess in Iraq by failing to listen to experts? Wasn't the politicization of every single decision, be it science, justice, war, budget, also an abject failure to follow the best advice out there?

I would argue yes.

How HRC thinks this can actually bolster her case, that she'll be more like W than Barack, is beyond me.

user-pic

The thing is that the oil companies will simply pass whatever additional taxes they have to pay back to the consumer, who will save nothing with Hillary's "plan." Plus, it's not like Congress is going to pass this plan anyway or, even if they did, Bush would sign it.

It's such a transparent political ploy that shows Hillary for who she really is--someone who will do, say, promise anything to get elected.

Hillary proposes a one-time raise in the allowance of all Americans! I predict Candy store and Movie theatre business goes through the roof this weekend!

You see, they can't do that because the excess profits tax would take that profit away too. All they would accomplish by raising the price is sell less gasoline.

Billionaires would also get the same 18 cents tax relief from Hillary. She feels the pain of all those struggling Billionaires.


So what's Obama's plan to help with the gas price crunch now? A lot of people can't afford to wait ten years to wait for new CAFE standards to kick in.

Economists are lined up against ethanol subsidies and Obama is a big ethanol backer. No pander there?

That's kind of the whole point - there isn't anything they could do to reduce prices now. Gimmicks like the gas tax "holiday" are worse than useless - they are actually detrimental because they give the impression of addressing the problem but don't. Unfortunately, this is all too common in the Washington approach to solving problems and it's why we need someone who will do things differently.

there isn't anything they could do to reduce prices now.

Possibly not. But I'm sure there are ways they could lessen the impact of these prices especially on low income drivers. Tax credits, gas stamps, I don't know. Think outside the box. People are getting killed at the pump right now.

Obama's "blueprint" won't help people any time soon. I'd like to see Obama throw out some ideas that might help NOW rather than just bash Hillary as a panderer.

And his position on ethanol is a pander too so let's dial down the indignation level a bit.

I'm not debating that Obama has been a proponent of ethanol subsidies. But it does appear he's willing to consider the complexities of the issue and the fact that such positions don't exist in a vacuum.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080504/ap_on_el_pr/democrats_ethanol_1

The government just sent out income tax rebates many times larger than the measly 30 bucks you'd get from the gas tax "holiday".


I found this. It's not exactly outside the box but it's something.

Obama appeared to acknowledge that Clinton's populist economic message is finding a receptive audience in Indiana when he called for a second round of government tax rebates. "Let me tell you something, people are really hurting," Obama said during his own appearance in Fort Wayne. "I am here to tell you, you're not on your own. We're in this together."
user-pic

Which is why he's siding with the Oil Companies. He's feels their 11 billion dollar profit "pain."

BLEAAAHH.

Please Hoosiers, wise up and resoundingly reject this craven shill.

Hillary is where Bob Dole was on this. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/5/5/4595/33889

And will soon be wherever Bob Dole is now, if anyone can find him.

Kos is stupid. I'll make you the offer I made above. If you can find proof that Bob Dole ever proposed taxing the excess profits of oil companies, I'll yeild to your superior wisdom and STFU. If you can't find the proof, you do the same. Deal? By the way josephcast is still out there looking for his proof. Maybe you guys can get together and shut me up. Or maybe Kos can help you out with that link. Let me know what he says? And ask him this. Since when do Progressives side with oil companies?

Announcer]: Hillary wants the oil companies to pay for the gas tax this summer - so you don't have to.

Hillary: in the fall and winter, you will have to resume paying those taxes at the pump. I know that you will then have to pay for back to school expenses, and very high heating costs, but by then your primary will be over, so Screw You Then!!!

Oilbama voted for Dick Cheney's Big Oil Energy Bill. Could this be the reason he is against a windfall profit tax against Oil companies? Gee, you think? Scumbag Oilbama is the candidate of Big Oil. Blame him when you ahve trouble paying for gas.

*sigh*

This is the eighth time someone has to point out to you that Obama in fact includes a well-thought-out non-temporary windfall profits tax in his energy policy, and Clinton has a similar plan. The difference between this plan and those plans is that this one is disastrously stupid.

This is also the eleventh time someone tells you that the "Dick Cheney Energy Bill" raised taxes for those "Big Oil" companies. It certainly was not a great bill, but there clearly are no actual issues you can take with it; resorting to outright lies, though, is rather unbecoming. And kills whatever credibility you may otherwise have.

"scumbag oilbama" I think was what diminished his credibility for me...

This Discourse-Raising Moment was brought to you by: Dembillc.

All you do is post on the energy bill. Why don't you actually Wiki it and google it and read up a bit on it before you post these inane comments.

Hillary is so negative, isn't she? No wonder Obama called her Annie Oakley.

As if Annie Oakley was anything near being compared to Jesse Jackson in SC, your democratic opponent saying that John McCain is more fit to be president than you, clumsily saying "..as far as I know" about Obama being a Christian, lying about his stance on Iraq repeatedly.. Yeah, being called Annie Oakley is so much worse.

Wasn't Annie Oakley's gun of choice a left-handed Mauser 66 rifle?

user-pic

Nice! ;)

user-pic

Could this be the reason he is against a windfall profit tax against Oil companies?

yes, the entire community of economists and other pointy-headed innerlectchuls is owned by the oil industry. only hillary, with her 8th-grade education (in a one-room schoolhouse!) has the guts to stand up to washington. when those peaceniks in washington wanted to NOT kill thousands of americans and furriners in iraq, only the tigress of tuzla had the guts to stand up and make them invade!

as john cole put it, "Her foreign policy seems lifted from the Weekly Standard, her domestic policies from the Kingfish, and the faux-populist nonsense seems designed only to dumb down the debate enough to grab a few more votes in the hopes that the supers decide to change their mind and throw the race to Hillary."

dumbed down enough for you, apparently.

So I gotta buy another friggin' Hallmark card?

What is not being articulating in all of this is the simple fact that the US President really can't do anything to lower gas prices. Insofar as the dollar remains weak, insofar as OPEC refuses to up production, insofar as consumer demand remains high, etc. then by the simple laws of supply and demand (and based on the much simpler fact that OPEC controls the price of gas) nothing can really be done to lower the price of gas.

Moreover, since we have now passed peak oil, the price of gas is only going to continue to increase. Thus, there is no short term fix, unless the government begins to subsidize people's gas bills, which still won't actually LOWER the cost of gas. Ergo, the only real solution to this crisis is to go energy independent, which won't happen for atleast another 2-3 decades.

You need to start paying attention.

The way to fix gas prices is to give everyone $30.

Voila!

"Ergo, the only real solution to this crisis is to go energy independent, which won't happen for atleast another 2-3 decades."

What is likely to happen to fuel prices in the interim? Oil closed above $120 today. $5, $6, $10 gas is coming. There will come a point when a critical mass of people can no longer afford to drive, and cars & trucks will be parked. America is laid out village, town, and city for the Car.

Well, at least it may do something about the obesity problem...

Pax,
M.

My favorite scene in the ad is Hillary standing next to that gas guzzling full size truck at the pump. It's important that we have a gas tax holiday so that people continue to buy more huge gas guzzling 4WD vehicles that never leave the pavement or haul anything heavier than a load of groceries.

And as soon as you call them on it, you get the "it's safer for my kids" B.S. I have watched in amazement all of my formerly progressive friends grow blinders upon childbirth. With 6 billion+ people and climbing rapidly, this tunnel-vision is demonstrably dangerous.

But one cannot tell anyone "how to raise kids." We'll require classes, a test, and a permit to move 2 tons of inert metal and plastic, but not for perhaps the most unpredictable force in nature: a human child, one likely doomed to life-long ignorance.

I think we'll be asking our children to grow up a lot faster in the future, many existing "adults" included.

Pax,
M.

The only way to reduce oil prices is to eliminate speculators (forcibly, if necessary).
Th only way to do that is to nationalize the energy industry (which should have been planned, at least, 40 years ago).
It's no trick to nationalize any industry. Countries do it all the time (though usually they're immediately overthrown by USers)...
Ipso facto, as the Latins say...

user-pic

I'm so glad she followed my advice. That's right, Hil. Embrace that loser gas tax gimmick and never let go.

If this were poker, her tell is pretty obvious. She always raises big time on a lousy hand.

Chuck Todd

...nearly half of all remaining delegates will get handed out tomorrow. And the math will be a lot more crystal clear after tomorrow, both in delegates and the popular vote. Following Guam, there are now 404 pledged delegates up grabs, and 187 of them will be decided on Tuesday. Plus, per our count, there are 268 undeclared superdelegates. Here are the basics of what each candidate needs: Assuming he wins half of the delegates tomorrow (93), Obama needs just 38% of ALL remaining delegates to get to the magic number of 2,025. If Clinton wins 94 delegates on Tuesday, she will need 66% of all remaining delegates. In addition, assuming that delegate split tomorrow, then Clinton will need 85% of all remaining PLEDGED delegates to catch Obama for the lead in that category. Moreover, if Clinton simply wanted to cut Obama's pledged delegate lead to 100, she'd need to win 62% of all remaining delegates after tomorrow. As we've noted before, the math is certainly difficult for Clinton.

Thank you! The key number is that 38%. The stronger he performs, the lower it goes. I think IN will be very close. The gas tax bribe was a real fart in church.

The number that jumped out to me is the 85% of pledged delegates she'll need to take the lead. Never. Going. To. Happen.

user-pic

What I heard is:

Clinton wants to give the oil companies the 18% at the expense of jobs and road safety . . . By passing a law through two legislative bodies and by an insane human-chimp hybrid in eighteen working days.

And thus did the Fantasy deepen...

Eight B-I-L-L-I-O-N Dollars....(insert evil laugh)!

user-pic

Look! Shiny!

Carol Soprano, where is Obama's plan for working families who are hurting at the pump?

oh, just tear down Hillary's plan? I thought he was the unity candidate.

he also backs less oversight on the teamsters union from mob corruption.

Mr. Me Too& Hope says ANYTHING to get elected

Out of one side of your mouth you're saying Obama doesn't support the Gas Tax Holiday but out of the other side you're saying he'll say anything to get elected.

Well, which one is it?

user-pic

Well, as the oil companies control YOUR opinion, it's easy to elect Obama, if they give the nod.

user-pic

Well, if you're really serious, here's a link to Obama's website which will outline his platform on energy and the environment. We are tearing down Hillary's gas tax holiday thing because there is not one economist who agrees that this is a good thing. She is completely off the mark here and she is being stubborn and resistant to any advice, even from experts.

Keep in mind, though, that Obama does not have any Hail Mary pass, short-term "fixes" for gas prices because there is no short-term, immediate solution - gas prices are going to stay where they are until we move away from our dependence on oil and develop alternatives. Of course, given this country's attention spans, long-term plans don't have as much impact as her pander because Americans love the instant gratification thing, even if it means hurting them later on.

http://www.barackobama.com/issues/energy/

user-pic

And another thing - he backs taking another look at the agreement between the Teamsters and the Feds to see if the ridiculous federal oversight laws can be eased somewhat - they are 19 years old, after all. I don't see any problem with that whatsoever, and Hillary made very similar comments when they were both courting the Teamster endorsement.

what about the silly stimulus package you're all going to be getting? where is your outrage?

think about how much you'll be paying for THAT boondoggle at least Hillary says its a temporary solution and NOT LONG TERM, to OBAMAS NO solution.

just complain and complain. BO outta touch with mainstream America.

user-pic

I vaguely recall one of Clinton's recent speaking points was "Let's end Bush's War on Science!"

How about ending your War on Economics? :-\

hyper,

answer, all the above, you answered your own question, thats Obama for you, he's all over the place. The man has little convictions, doesn't stand for anything, wheres the solution to help hurting families when the barrel of oil hit 120$ today, hmm?

That doesn't really make any sense. If he was willing to say anything to get elected he'd be pushing for the Gas Tax Holiday. It's great for scoring cheap political points. But he's not willing to do that.

He knows it's pure political smoke and mirrors.

He knows the consumer won't see any reduction in price because that's what happened in IL.

He knows that if prices are lowered then demand will go up and then prices will rise again.

Besides the fact that the Gas Tax Holiday has nothing to do with the price of a barrel of crude, the fact of the matter is there is no quick fix to gas prices. He wants to investigate price gouging and push for alternative fuels, but he's not willing to lie to the American public about some bullshit quick fix solution. It's Hillary who is willing to say anything to rustle up a few extra votes.

user-pic

wheres the solution to help hurting families when the barrel of oil hit 120$ today, hmm?

It's not coming from Hillary. Hurting families won't see a cut in gas prices when the oil companies jack up their prices again to make up that 18 cents a gallon.

How does a gas tax holiday affect the price of oil? It doesn't. It's a non-solution. (Hint: listen to the elitist economists)

So what motive do oil companies have for raising prices if they don't get to make any profit on the price raise?

Let's take it step by step. We can do that. We have time. No elevator pitch. Slow down and think it through with me. Maybe I don't understand it, but here's how it looks to me.

First, I think you're right. The oil companies control the price of gasoline. Upstream somewhere, the Saudis control the price of crude, along with the speculators, but at the pump it's pretty much the oil companies, and they want to charge as much as they can and make as much profit as they can.

So we have their price and we add a tax to that, and the tax revenue goes into a fund to build highways and other infrastructure.

Now Clinton comes along with two messages. One message is to the oil companies. It says you guys are price gouging the consumer. You're making excess profits. In other words, your rate of profit is too high. I'm going to take some of that profit away, and give it back to the consumers.

The way I'm going to do that is I'm going to tax that extra profit away and use it in place of the the taxes consumers have been paying to fund highway construction. Now you can raise the price of gasoline if you want to, but if you do, the extra profit you make is just going into that highway fund.

The other message is to drivers. It says take a break. The oil companies are going to fund highway construction this summer while I take a look at their profits.

Now here are the objections to that plan that are for public consumption.

1. The oil companies will just raise prices and pocket the extra money. Consumers will end up paying the same total price, because the price of gasoline will rise to the old price plus the tax, which is the price consumers have been paying.

2. Highway constructions jobs will be lost because there will be less money in the construction fund if consumers don't pay that tax.

3. People will drive more and that will increase emissions.

4. Gasoline will be cheaper, so we'll lose our incentive to develop more efficient engines and alternatives to petroleum.

And then there are the unspoken objections.

1. To implement an excess profits tax, you have to look at the profits, how they are being made, and determine what a "fair" profit is. In other words, the Clinton plan puts government right smack dab in the middle of those oil companies' business and increases governments regulation of the industry. You need a board to determine what a fair rate of profit is and the power to tax away profits that the government views as "excessive."

2. The public is going to find out who is making those profits and exactly how they are being made.

3. A precedent is being set for taking away the obscene profits the oil and gas industry are going to make as the world runs out of petroleum.

4. We might even start talking about nationalizing one of the industries America's security depends on as oil runs out.

Let's think about those points for a while before we discuss the objections one by one.

hyper,

ok I give you your little cheap talk speel, where is Obama's plan for hurting American families? More of the same ol same ol, GWBush speak, yada yada....NADA zilch. the man has no originality, nothing cooking in the oven. Thats what leadership is about being bold and shaking up the status quo and Obama is MIA.

READ THIS: Hillary's PLAN is a TEMPORARY SOLUTION to a bad situation. He voted on it 3 times in Illinois so it didn't work, but Hillary believes it does because she will find money to pay for it from the windfall profits of big oil and wouldn't take jobs as Obama says it will. Maybe you're rich and its not much to you, but it helps truckers that bring food to market, and families for a *short* time this summer.

Ever hear of 1000$ to fill your tank? Thats what truckers are paying now. It would help them.

hillary wants to investigate price gouging too...didn't you read HER plan? sheesh.

I invite you to read her plan, hillaryclinton.com

Oh and Obama used to say he was the unity and hope candidate, now he threw those signs away and calls himself the American dream candidate.

Hillary still has the same signs up, she's not changing anything, she doesn't rely on slogans and silly words that don't mean anything. So, who is the candidate that says anything to get elected, its Obama.

He's waiting for Hillary to say the next thing since he can't think of ANYTHING,just says Me Too ! (-:

How is he saying "me too" if he's disagreeing with her on the Gas Tax? You can't have it both ways.

And to talk about having no originality when Hillary is championing an idea she stole from McCain (who took it from Bob Dole 12 years ago) is beyond hilarious.

But you're just not getting it. It won't help anyone ever. Not truckers, not regular people, not even temporarily.

If the tax were lifted, the price would drop, demand would increase and the price would go back up. If you can't understand that, well, then I see why you're throwing your lot in with Hillary "I don't listen to experts" Clinton.

We've had 7 years of a President ignoring the advice of experts. If you want 4 more, that's your right. But I'm going to cast my vote for the President who listens to expert advice.

You seem to ba an interested, thoughtful reader. Look upstream a little and let's discuss what I posted there. I'll keep an open mind if you will.

Obama didn't take bold steps like Hillary did bringing a gas tax holiday. It is *SOMETHING* and she's covering the bases untill we change the awful policies of GWB. I think Obama will bring more of the same failed policies of GWB. For the great orator he's known for he comes across short on ideas.

he's known as a "me too" candidate because he waits for Hillary to start the conversation or answer a question, and says "me too". He's the reactionary candidate.

From what I've heard from him he doesn't relate well to working people, but aside from that lets hear HIS PLAN....I want to know how he will ease my pocket book for me and my kids.

aside from that its nice you're voting!

the Gas Tax Holiday was not brought by Hillary, but by John McCain. Hillary is taking her lead from McCain

I hope the NY Times -- having bizarrely ignored the dangers implicit (and explicit) in Hillary Clinton's deranged idea for the U.S. to provide a nuclear shield to Saudi Arabia, KUwait, UAE and Dubai -- will bring more seriousness to bear on her statement today that she would try to break up OPEC (the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries):

"We’re going to go right at OPEC," she said. "They can no longer be a cartel, a monopoly that get to gether once every couple of months" at a hotel in "some plush place in the world" to set prices, she told a crowd a volunteer fire house in Merillville.

hyper, you're wrong that demand would increase, because people are using less gas these days. We;'ve got 4$+ gas out west in san francisco area.

we are using mass transit and staying home more. The media isn't telling you, but my insurance company is saying that demand is down, people using less.

the media is manipulating the message, but there are more bikes in the streets. People are walking more, carpooling. The word of an economist rests with stats. We've never had this high of gas prices, and people are re-writing the stats.

Hillary will bring healthcare too. Get on board theres room in the tent (-:

Good info. Big oil is scared to death she is going to open their books and determine what a fair rate of return on their investment is. They have been making out like bandits. If she could get people behind this it could make a real difference. Oil is running out. These companies are already making obscene profits. She wants to take a look at that and set a precedent for taking those obscene profits away and using them for society. We should get behind her on this one no matter what our politics are.

Big oil is scared to death of Hillary?
You're joking, right?

No, I'm not. Windfall and excess profits flaps are a very big deal. Corporations have to open their books and submit to regulation and limits on their profitability. It's as in your face to a corporation as it gets.

Hillary is not the one to do it.

She's not going to go there. It's all smoke and mirrors--she can talk tough because she doesn't believe what she's saying. This bill is dead and she knows it. It's pandering, pure and simple.

And ignoring her own experts on this--She's going all G.W. Bush on us.

By the way, Hillary has accepted more money from
from oil and gas company PACs and employees than Obama has. She's not quite the revolutionary you think she is.

In order for polls to have Hillary beating McCain by 15 to 20%, she would have to retain Black voters at the rate Kerry did AND wing White males at a higher rate. Those two things will happen on the same day Miami Beach freezes over and penguins walk the entire distance from Chile to Key West on a giant ice sheet. In other words, never!

In the entire ad I didn't see anyone saying that they will benefit from the "8 billion in all" (lol, politics is so amusing), or the few cents a day. I wonder if there is anyone out there who really thinks that a thirty cent a day increase in their revenue is really helpful.

I would write to Hillary to tell her how much I like her gas tax idea, except that I'd lose a full day's worth of "relief" covering the postage!

lol!

user-pic

Let's take it step by step.

Sure, let's take it step by step.

Now Clinton comes along with two messages. One message is to the oil companies. It says you guys are price gouging the consumer. You're making excess profits. In other words, your rate of profit is too high. I'm going to take some of that profit away, and give it back to the consumers.

The way I'm going to do that is I'm going to tax that extra profit away and use it in place of the the taxes consumers have been paying to fund highway construction. Now you can raise the price of gasoline if you want to, but if you do, the extra profit you make is just going into that highway fund.

Right, but she put the steps in the opposite order. It was:

Step 1) I'm going to give you money!
Step 2) I'm going to get that money from the oil companies

Just from a procedural perspective, there's no way a windfall profits tax is passing in Congress before the summer is over. There's no way it's passing before the election. And, no way it's passing before the next Congress is seated. And she knows it. She's not even going to be able to rush the gas tax holiday through Congress before the summer is over. So, this is all academic, anyway.

But, if we can pretend that anything would even come of her plan, let's address one of your arguments:

So what motive do oil companies have for raising prices if they don't get to make any profit on the price raise?

It's a tax on the profits. It doesn't mean they surrender all of their profits. It means that, to overcome the discount in their profits caused by the tax, they increase prices, and therefore profits, even more. If an oil company's profits were $10 billion and they were taxed at x%, they can increase their prices by x+% and still get their $10 billion.

Pass the windfall profits tax first, or find an even better way to rein in the oil companies. But, the gas tax isn't the cause of high gas prices. It's stayed steady for years. Why attack something that isn't the cause? That doesn't do anything to deter the oil companies from raising prices and neither does a tax on their profits.

Besides, if cutting the gas tax is such a great idea, why just do it for three months?

Thanks, man. Well, as I understand her plan, the holiday and the tax go together. I could be wrong, because I haven't seen her actual bill. I know she links them in her talking points, so I assume when she says it will work if you implement it right that she's planning to make the holiday contingent on passing the tax. If I'm wrong, then she needs to do it like that to keep the Congress from gaming her by passing the holiday without the tax. That would be McCain's deal. Not Hillary's.

As far as the tax goes, once you set a fair rate of return on a company's investment, you can tax anything that would increase that rate over the fair rate of return. In other words, if we decide 15% is a fair return, we can tax 100% of the revenue that makes the return greater than 15%. She needs to make sure people know the tax on the oil companies could actually be more than 18 cents/gallon. I'm getting excited just writing this.

I'm sick and tired of watching oil companies make obscene profits as the world's supply of petroleum runs out.

You said it! And that's why Hillary is my revolution, and that's why the oil and gas companies are going after her on this one, aided and abetted by everyone's favorite Progressive candidate for President, you know who.

The first step is to tax their fucking obscene profits. She knows that. Open up their books and tax their fucking obscene profits away. She's a warrior and Obama is an empty suit in the tank for big oil.

If you're going to call yourself a Progressive, be a damn Progressive.

user-pic

Now, now Billy, bee nice.

Appeal to their superior intelligence the way the oil companies do.

;)

Um, Obama wants a windfall profits tax too. So, I guess that makes Obama your revolution and Clinton the empty suit for big oil.

Over at progressive.org, Rothschild notes that the gas tax is a regressive tax anyway, so that a tax holiday would help lower income folks get by for a few months. Hard to say what gas price projections are for the Fall, but I think they typically come down a bit for September anyway.

Anyway, I still think there's nothing wrong with pandering to the public if done in sane amounts. That's kind of why they elect you.

Hillary, a warrior?
She whines about how the boys treat her
She whines about how the press treats her
wait till congress gets her, then she'll really whine!
and now she's pandering to voters over this Gas Tax Holiday.

She's not even serious about this bill. It's a way to get votes.

who the heck are you responding to when you say "Thanks, Man" & "You said it!"--Are you responding to your own comments?

You and "heh" seem to buy into the same Clinton talking points.

Waiting for a girl and she gets me into fights
Waiting for a girl we get drunk on friday nights
She's a sight for sore eyes
Waiting for my factory girl

See I am just a monkey man
And I'm glad she is a monkey woman too

(G'tar solo, Keef... Get down, Nicky, tickle 'em)

I miss Nicky Hopkins.
Nice of you to give him a shout out.

hmmm...so many areas to include Hillary in
songs by the Stones...I won't go there, though.

user-pic

A way to get votes?

Apparently not.

You're far too clever to do something for your own good.

The oil companies said so.

You're so much smarter than folks that see blood-soaked obscene profits and record prices at the pump and can add 1+1.

You've out thunk them folks. If it's good for big oil to avoid paying a war tax, than by golly, it's good enough for you.

Especially since they couched it in terms relating to how you're just so much smarter than your neighbor.

Oh, that yellow, smelly stuff running down your back? It's rain.

hey idiot it is a statute.

Well, then I suppose it wouldn't matter so much that it's a stupid idea that wouldn't work, since it would never pass and would never get signed. So I guess that would make it brilliant? Is that how it works, Einstein?

HEH:

Hillary has a plan for hurting America's families.

Where is Obama's plan for hurting America's families?

Obama likes America's families!

Why does Hillary hate America's families?

hey jack,so by your logic, you're saying high prices on everything so its ok to hurt America's families? so is that the solution? there are some sick people out there. nuf said.

what part of TEMPORARY solution don't you understand?

It works for me. Are you going to return the stimulus check president bush is going to send you?
you'll take it won't you? tell me you're going to send it to Obama, like he needs it. Are you one of his 96$ little people donors?

where is Obama's solution? nothing, because the guy is all hat and no cattle.

nice guy though

Nice post on how in one case the tax holiday actually worked: Lyin eyes, lowering current costs as well as rebound costs. Go figger, maybe dem economists ain't that durn smart, eh?

In another post he notes how far $30 would take him back during unemployment after the internet bust - rather amusing as well as a nice reminder that some people think in rahmens rather than lattes.

From "Head of State"

http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/05/gas-tax-holiday-multiple-choice.html

"Tuesday, May 06, 2008

Gas Tax Holiday: Multiple Choice

Hillary Clinton's claim that a Gas Tax Holiday will help middle class Americans, at the same time that her advisers have privately stated the opposite to the Washington Post, namely that they are aware that this will result in an increase in gas prices, and that it is "just politics", is most similar in political mindset and ideology to:

a) Former Bush Administration Chief of Staff Andy Card stating that the Administration waited until September to make its case for Iraq because `From a marketing point of view, you don't introduce new products in August';

b) Paul Wolfowitz predicting that the costs of reconstruction in Iraq would be paid for by oil profits from that nation, when contemporaneous predictions of the costs of the war and a subsequent insurgency would be, and have been, far greater;

c) Dick Cheney's prediction we would be greeted in Iraq as "liberators, despite numerous pre-war intelligence analyses which warned “that the U.S. would face armed resistance from Iraqis following the fall of Saddam Hussein’s regime.”

d) All of the above

Cite:

Head of State

http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/05/gas-tax-holiday-multiple-choice.html

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address