Montana and South Dakota do not count. Only Puerto Rico counts.

And accoring to Clinton-rules Puerto Rico doesn't really count because it is only good for more delegates, and they don't count.

No, wait a minute...it's the popular vote that counts now. Nevermind that the Puerto Rican population contributing to the popular vote totals in the primary won't actually vote in the general election.

It is all so clear, that is if everyone would just clean the shit out of their eyes and look at the election through the HRC's distorted lenses.

The huge African American population in Montana is without any doubt the reason for this advantage.

No hard working Americans, white Americans in Montana?

Dang Montana and its limousine rustlers...

Good news!

It will soon be all over on June 4th when the Supers stampede over to Obama.

this race was won in February and just about everyone paying attention could have guessed then who would win which states. none of this is a surprize.

Montana doesn't matter, nothin' but a bunch of latte sippin' negroes.

where the hell is idiotic?

FOR HILLARY

Those black racists of Montana- damn them.

From a poster at the HP:

"Obama's campaign used her comment for political purposes. The NY Post and Drudge Report misconstrued her comments originally. Obama's campaign ran with it and "condemned" her statement before she was even out of the grocery store based on the false NY Post report... it was out of context, it was NOT what she said. But in this era of unchecked journalism, it ignited the firestorm. Only later in the day did Obama say he "Took her at her word." He waited to weigh in until his campaign was satisfied they damaged her severely. 18,000 raging posts later, it did some damage, alright. To the unity of this party. To the election in November. Obama's people should have immediately stopped the madness. But his camp wanted more hatred and outrage directed towards HRC to pressure the Supers. It was politics of the worst kind."

Well said and Obama had you fooled.

Didn't he?

As one American so poetically wrote, "Is ther a matching straight jacket for her yellow pant suit." Yep, she's flipped. But, not before she and Bill take money from poor uneducated whites. You don't think they want to be left with that entire campaign debt, do you? What gready sleezy conning couple who disguise themselves as caring and loving Americans.

There are 110 delegates on the line on June 3. If Obama is 57 behind, and President Carter (who has strongly hinted that he favors Obama) and a handful of others come out for him on June 4, Obama wins. Lets say he gets 25 of the 64 available in Puerto Rico and he pulls 28 of the remainder from S.D. and Montana he is about 4 short.

Here is something for the remaining Supers to think about. Do you really want to jump on board after the train has left the station?

Too bad Obama loses to McCain.

If on June 3, in the wake of the 5/31 rules committee meeting, neither candidate has the nomination clinched it is going to the convention.

Obama will spend June, July and part of August fighting off the Republican onslaught using his war chest.

Clinton will be quietly conferring with SDs, persuading them not to pledge in order to see how Obama does.

He will be enervated and exposed as the weak candidate that he is.

Clinton, rested, revitalized and funded will step in to the relief of the Democratic Party.

Clinton remains the best choice.

And Montana goes Republican either way!

The sad thing is that even though Obama will win the nomination around June 3rd, on the day Hillary wins PR she is going to bash Obama for not winning the Hispanic vote.

May 25, 2008
Gallup Daily: Clinton Maintains Lead Over McCain
Obama has 5-point lead over Clinton among Democrats

PRINCETON, NJ -- Gallup Poll Daily tracking from May 20-24 finds Hillary Clinton maintaining a significant 49% to 44% lead over John McCain when registered voters are asked about their preferences for the fall general election, while McCain has a slight 47% to 45% advantage over Barack Obama.

Despite the fact that Obama is considered to be the highly probable Democratic nominee, Gallup Poll Daily tracking continues to show that, at the moment, Clinton is performing better against presumptive Republican nominee John McCain than is Obama. Clinton's five percentage point lead over McCain is statistically significant, and considerably stronger than Obama's 2-point loss to McCain among registered voters nationwide.

At the same time that Clinton is enjoying stronger support than Obama against McCain in terms of hypothetical general election matchups, she continues to lose to Obama among national Democrats. The most recent May 22-24 three-day rolling average has Obama at 50% and Clinton at 45%, a slightly smaller margin than in previous days.

There are only three primaries left for Democrats this year -- Puerto Rico on June 1, and South Dakota and Montana on June 3. At that point, all eyes will turn to challenger Clinton as she and her campaign team contemplate their next move as the Democratic Party moves towards their late August convention in Denver. -- Frank Newport

When will some of you guys realize that the trolls on this blog are not Clinton supporters or even McCain supporters. They are 15 year old kids who just like jerking your chain and watching you flop around. And some of you folks fall for it everytime.

Josh needs to get some troll disenfectant.

Hey goatlife did you study for your English Lit final? Maybe you'll make it to the 11th grade afterall.

This far away from election day, the campaign is about energy, money, party unity, and organization. Any polled advantage that is within the margin of error is irrelevant.

Arguably, Obama has the upper hand in all of these.......except for for party unity. If Sen. Clinton were to appear to enthusiastically support Obama, this probably would be alleviated (I think).

And mr. bill is whining that only the clintons can win the general election. Welllll, the current electoral count from my favorite prognosticator who was spot on the last two presidential elections and the 2006 midterms, a ruby red republican by the way, isssss Obama 293, McCain 245. But he can't win the general election mr. bill. Mr. bill lies again, what a shock.

Here is the link:

http://www.electionprojection.com/

By the way I think that this is conservative, unless something bizzare happens Obama breaks 300 easily.

Just another example of Obama doing well west of the atlantic (or east of the pacific- whichever!) !!

The question is, can anyone honestly imagine a scenario where the DNC gives the nomination to Hillary?

"Oh, I'm sorry, but even though you won the most delegates, states, and raised the most money against the person who, at this point last year, was the heavily-favored establishment candidate, we've decided to give the nomination to the cash-strapped former presumptive nominee due to the fact that you are polling within the margin of error of your general election opponent. Plus, we have a vague feeling that something bad might come out about you in the future. Again, sorry, but I'm sure that it's clear to everyone why we were forced to go another direction."

Unless someone can explain how that conversation comes to pass, this is all sound an fury.

It does not matter which red states Bill Clinton won. He would not have done so, if Ross Perot was not a candidate.
In 1992 Bill Clinton got 43% of the popular vote. 57% voted against him. He benefited from it being a three way contest, and therefore is not a good example to apply to this year's one on one contest.