Did she use that article from The Hill on that matter about how the Wright ads failed in the Democratic races? Many superdelegates read The Hill and the Roll Call.

Did she use that article from The Hill on that matter about how the Wright ads failed in the Democratic races? Many superdelegates read The Hill and the Roll Call.

That's actually the way I felt when the Rev. junk came out, and definately after the Press Club debacle. Obama has been unfairly victimized, handled it in the classiest way possible, and gave us a glimpse of our future President. I just wish he could start now!

O noes! Pundits don't agree with her! Since when has their conventional wisdom been right about this primary?

Bill Richardson stated point blank that he joined based on Obama's handling of Wright I, Joe Andrew cited Wright II as a reason.

Obama has disposed of Wright with NO impact in the polling boothes of Indiana and North Carolina during the 24/7 coverage of Wright for the week prior.

Sure the Republicans will try to use Wright in the fall, then they have to expalin Hagee and that other dude.

Why is the concept that known risk and controlled risk is better than the unknown?

So this is the best the dems have to offer.

A radical liberal that has not led on a single issue and will not count two big States vs a RWingnut and the same bush policies that has us in this mess.

Lord help us.

Geez.

How much is Hillary willing to lose of her own personal fortune. Read the following article. It explains why she can only get her loans to her campaign up to the convention date. After that she her campaign can only recover $250K from her campaign funds.

http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/campaign-2008/2008/05/08/why-clinton-stands-to-lose-millions.html

Why Clinton Stands to Lose Millions
The struggling candidate must act quickly if she wants her campaign debts repaid
By Bret Schulte
Posted May 8, 2008

With rounds to fight running out, the self-described Rocky Balboa of politics will soon be forced to assess the damage sustained by the most expensive primary bout in history. Sen. Hillary Clinton doled out $6.4 million of her own money to her campaign since April, her campaign told reporters this week. That brings her total cash outlay to more than $11 million since January. And she's not ruling out spending more as she plans to compete in the six remaining contests. If she plans to knock out heavyweight fundraising champ, Sen. Barack Obama, she may have no other choice.
Related News

Experts disagree on whether or not Clinton will actually stick in the fight until the Democratic National Convention in August. But the date looms large for another reason—at least, if she hopes to recoup any of the millions she has sunk into the campaign. Thanks to a little-known provision in 2002's McCain-Feingold campaign-finance reform bill, a campaign must repay the loan to a candidate before Election Day. In this case, that's the nominating convention. After the election has passed, a bankrupt campaign is limited to gathering just $250,000 from contributors, which means that modest sum is all it can give back to a candidate. In short, Clinton stands to lose $11,150,000. "If she wants to be repaid, she'd have to move on that between now and the national convention," says former Federal Election Commission chairman Michael Toner. "Otherwise, it just becomes another contribution."

ABC News This Week host George Stephanopoulos said that sources tell him that Sen. Hillary Clinton's campaign debt could be as high as $20 million -- more than double earlier reports.

Angry Bill is back.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/05/bill-angrily-de.html

May 08, 2008 5:51 PM

ABC News' Sarah Amos reports: While speaking at Fayetteville High School in Fayetteville, West Virginia, former President Bill Clinton was interrupted by a woman who said he and Hillary Clinton promised to fix healthcare when he was president and then did nothing.

Clinton got angry during the exchange, clearly upset by the woman's claim.

"And do you know why it was defeated? Clinton asked, "I can't believe you are saying this. There are, there are millions of pages of documents that we have released. Showing the exhausting work that was done, the tens of thousands of people who were consulted, the rallies and movements we had all over the country."

The former president then added: "This is, one of the problems, one of the problems of this whole presidential campaign is how many things that people have said that are flat untrue."

Bill Clinton angrily defended his wife, telling the woman Hillary's first universal healthcare plan failed because of Republican opposition.

"She worked her, she worked her fingers to the bone, I worked my fingers to the bone," He said. "We got beat because [Former Senate Majority Leader] Robert Dole, who promised to work with me on it, got a memo which said, you will never be elected president and the Republicans can't win a majority unless you keep them from adopting anything and they filibustered my healthcare bill. That's what happened."

lima misquoting me:

"She worked her, she worked her fingers to the bone, I worked my fingers to the bone,"

Here is what I really said:

"She worked her, she worked her fingers up and down my bone, I worked my fingers up and down the bones of her scalp."

By the way: We are entitled to our millions.
And yes Obami... he really should pay off our campaign debts.

After all, if it wasn't for our civil rights efforts... that little black prick wouldn't even be in this race.

Shame on you Barack Obama for not realizing that you are beholden to us. Shame on you!

Goatlife has transformed into a dying HAL

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xOEJ-VuvLM

"Stop Dave. I'm afraid Dave. Dave, My mind is going. I can feel it, I can feel it...."

lima = liam

Sorry. Don't want to lose your donation after Hillary steals the election.

PS: Here is the link for your donation:

https://contribute.hillaryclinton.com/donate-b.html?sc=a724

Say ahhhhhhh...
And give all you can give

It sounds like the Obama camp wants to bring out 3 or 4 new superdelegates every day until May 20th and see if they can get a flood more at that point to go over the top.

But I wonder if the racial talk from the Clinton camp continues if there will be a flood before then just to get this over with.

How many weeks have you been ranting that "Oilbama" is in the pockets of corporations? Yet now now he is a "radical liberal"...?

You should let the assgaskates over at LGF decide on which nonsensical rants and talking points yo run with, i.e. whether he is a Muslim or a radical Christian that believes in helping the poor, and also whether he is a radical liberal or in the tank for big business... before you come here and try and catapult it.

I remember Mayor Frank Rizzo of Philadelphia exhorting his followers at a rally to "Vote White". Is that so much different from what Senator Clinton said?

Anyone know the deal with Rep. Ellsworth? Did he or did he not endorse Clinton?

The Clinton campaign had a harder time gaining traction. After a number of media outlets — including Politico — reported that Indiana Rep. Brad Ellsworth was backing Clinton, his spokeswoman put out the word that there was some “nuance” to the congressman’s position: Ellsworth is actually remaining neutral in the race but will cast his superdelegate vote for the candidate who carried his district (Clinton) if the nomination process goes all the way to convention, "unless,” of course, “there is a compelling reason to do otherwise."

Obama only needs 52 superdelegates to deny Hillary a chance to ever reach 2025 mark. This is based on the assumption that Hillary will win W.Virginia (60%), Kenturky (60%), and PR (58%) and Obama picking the rest of the states by 53-55%. Mark this estimates!!!!!

It also runs counter to common sense. The only way supers would step forward earlier because of Jeremiah Wright would be if they were already Obama supporters, and they were trying to counter any impression that Wright hurt Obama. There have been plenty of reliable polls that show he did indeed hurt Obama. And how could he not?

I think all these trolls are infected with that virus from that stupid 28 Days Later movie.

Michelle Obama’s Writings Display Disturbing Racism

Americans must ask: ‘Do we really want this woman in the White House’?

By Pat Shannan

Just what kind of “change” is Barack Obama offering and just how much influence has his wife, Michelle had over him in their married life the past two decades? It appears that Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama does not look into a crowd of Obama supporters and see Americans. She sees black people and white people, eternally conflicted with one another.

In her senior thesis at Princeton University, Michelle LaVaughn, the future wife of the Democratic presidential candidate, stated that America was a nation founded on “crime and hatred.” Moreover, she stated that whites in America were “ineradicably racist.”

The 1985 thesis, entitled Princeton-Educated Blacks and the Black Community, was written under her maiden name, Michelle LaVaughn. Michelle Obama writes that the path she chose by attending Princeton would likely lead to her “further integration and/or assimilation into a white cultural and social structure that will only allow me to remain on the periphery of society, never becoming a full participant.”

Not only does she see separate black and white societies in America, but emphatically elevates black over white in her world. As first lady, would she insist the White House be painted black? That’s been a standard joke in this venue since the civil rights movement of the 1960s, but this next ominous quote from her thesis suggests that she would in fact urge her husband toward just such an extreme position.

“There was no doubt in my mind that as a member of the black community, I am obligated to this community and will utilize all of my present and future resources to benefit the black community first and foremost.”

She seems to justify those feelings with what she claims to see on the other side of the issue: “Predominantly white universities like Princeton are socially and academically designed to cater to the needs of the white students, comprising the bulk of their enrollments.”

Michelle added in her thesis that to “whites at Princeton, it often seems as if, to them, [I] will always be black first.” However, it was reported by a fellow black classmate, “if those ‘whites at Princeton ‘ really saw Michelle as one who always would ‘be black first,’ it seems that she gave them that impression.”

Michelle Obama’s poll of black alumni concludes that other black former students at Princeton do not share her obsession with blackness. But rather than celebrate, she is horrified that black alumni identify with our common American culture more than they value the color of their skins.

“I hoped that these findings would help me conclude that despite the high degree of identification with whites as a result of the educational and occupational path that black Princeton alumni follow, the alumni would still maintain a certain level of identification with the black community. However, these findings do not support this possibility,” she wrote.

Most black alumni ignored her racist questionnaire. Only 89 students responded, out of 400 who were asked for input.

The thesis provides a trove of Mrs. Obama’s thoughts and world view seen through a race-based prism. For a potential first lady, this is a very divisive view that would do untold damage to race relations in this country in a Barack Hussein Obama administration.

During this presidential election year in which the term “transparency” has been frequently bandied about, candidates have buried a number of potentially revealing documents and papers. In Hillary Rodham Clinton’s case, there’s been a clamoring for tax records, White House memos and other material the candidate’s team has chosen to keep from release.

The 96-page, 1985 Princeton thesis, restricted from release by the school’s Mudd Library, has also been the subject of recent scrutiny. Commentator Jonah Goldberg remarked on National Review Online, “A
reader in the know informs me that Michelle Obama’s thesis is unavailable until Nov. 5, 2008, at the Princeton library. I wonder why.”

“Why a restricted thesis?” asked Pastor Louis Lapides on his website,
Thinking Outside the Blog. “Is the concern based on what’s in the thesis? Will Michelle Obama appear to be too black for white America or not black enough for black America?”

Will an Obama administration really offer constructive “change” or just an intellectually refined racism?