« Obama Rolls Out Two More Super-Del Endorsements | Home | For One Missouri Newspaper, It's Obama Versus McCain »
Obama Rolls Out Two More Super-Del Endorsements
Hillary may have won West Virginia by a landslide last night, but it's Obama who brandishes the first sign of momentum this morning, rolling out two new super-delegate endorsements.
They are Democrats Abroad Chair Christine Schon Marques (half a super) and Indiana Rep. Pete Visclosky.
A quick note on super-del policy here: Because Obama has what is essentially an insurmountable delegate lead, we won't be doing a post on every single super-del endorsement unless there's something remarkable about it. Instead, we'll do one or two daily posts wrapping up the day's super-del action.
Advertisement





Comments (42)
He also got two more .5 superdelegates - link here.
May 14, 2008 9:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Are those two 0.5 superdelegates? I thought they each counted as one, although as of now it only counts as one because one of them is from Michigan
May 14, 2008 9:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, right, yes, you're correct. Apologies.
May 14, 2008 9:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Then get ready for a big post, because I have a feeling today will be in the 6-8 super range for Obama
May 14, 2008 9:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
He also recieved two endorsements via youtube from Young Democrat Chairs Awais Khaleel (WI) and Lauren Wolfe (MI) endorsed Obama last night. so +1 more (Lauren being from MI)
May 14, 2008 9:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Speaking of insurmountable leads, when do the April fund raising numbers come out?
May 14, 2008 9:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
I actually considered endorsing Obama last night, thinking, well, compared to most politicians he's not that bad, probably not dumb, and maybe even up to the job, despite a lack of any clear evidence to prove it. But then I thought, the three presidents in modern (post 1900) history with the least experience, by far, are W, Obama (assuming he were elected) and JFK. And W and JFK are actually among the worst, along with Harding.
W and JFK: loutish rich kids who went to Ivy institutions based on family money and social class. Undistinguished academic careers.
Obama: pompous middle-class kid who goes to Ivy institutions based on checking the "AA" box. Undistinguished academic career.
W: "businessman" living off sweetheart deals from people wanting a connection to Sr.
JFK: "writer" of Pulitzer winning book, written by someone else.
Obama: "law professor" who never published a single scholarly article, usually a requisite to teach law.
W: governor for a few years
JFK: Senator for a term
Obama: Senator or a few years
Performance:
W: well, pretty obvious
JFK: because he got assasinated, people get all weepy over Kennedy, but he was in fact not at all that good a president.
Obama: well, as Borat says, if you want, you can let a monkey fly a plane, but watch out, you don't know what's gonna happen!
So you have guys who never actually accomplished anything on their own, who are privileged by one reason or another, whose purported achievements are actually make-believe, and then they have the serious responsibilities of the presidency to handle.
Sorry, Obama's not proven and definitely not ready.
May 14, 2008 9:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
You've activated my race card.
It's funny, if you plug Hillary into those categories, she comes off as just as bad if not worse. I'm guessing this is a McCain troll.
May 14, 2008 9:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm guessing it's another incarnation of Milorad/Ludmila/Yilla/whatever.
Can't TPM ban IP addresses or ranges? It's really embarrassing to let the same troll sign up over and over again.
May 14, 2008 9:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
That post is an automatic robotroll that is going on several threads with the same wording.
Ignore it.
May 14, 2008 10:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
and yet, Clinton lost to Obama in terms of
a. pledged delegates
b. super delegates
c. popular vote
e. organization
f. total donations
g. number of small donors
she's on top though, in one count: debt
I wonder where this places her on your scale
May 14, 2008 9:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, Obama is brilliant enough to overcome the Clinton machine, but you're saying he actually lacked the talent Columbia on his own, without affirmative action??
May 14, 2008 10:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
What an appropriate handle: green and slimy.
Definitely the #1 candidate for dumbest post of the week. JFK = GWB.
JFK loutish? Yeah, about as loutish as Cary Grant. FDR was called a "traitor to his class" but it was Jack Kennedy who was the real traitor. Which is why he was blown away.
Not the space here to detail this, but a very beautiful and spiritual book has just been published, by the reknowned Catholic theologian and political activist James Douglass, on the early 1960s:
http://www.amazon.com/JFK-Unspeakable-Why-Died-Matters/dp/1570757550/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1210775027&sr=8-1
And a brilliant new documentary is about to play the theaters here in NYC:
http://www.virtualjfk.com/
John F. Kennedy is to George W. Bush as a thoroughbred stallion is to a cockroach.
May 14, 2008 10:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
you forgot the 2 young dem chair endorsements from late last night. one from michigan so only one counts i guess.
May 14, 2008 9:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Undistinguished academic career." Right. Because to get on Harvard Law Review in the first place, you only have to finish your first year in about the top 10% of the class (whether in terms of grades or your writing). And being in the top 10% or so at Harvard is a cake-walk, obviously.
May 14, 2008 9:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
wrong. AAs don't have to grade-on. dumb bunny.
May 14, 2008 9:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
"dumb bunny."
I can't believe the blubbering vagina can actual post non-copy-and-pasted thoughts. I'd be impressed if you weren't so pathetic.
May 14, 2008 9:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Don't bother responding to Godzilla - he's spamming every post with the same racist, bigoted bullshit (methinks he is the infamous Milo/Mila/Ludmilla/Yilla troll). Ignore him...
May 14, 2008 9:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think anyone else uses the odd expression "dumb bunny".
As I said, it is embarrassing for TPM to let the same troll register, hmm, about ten times now.
May 14, 2008 9:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, that last post just gave him away.
May 14, 2008 10:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
I see that, after Hillary's big 'win' in WV, her Intrade number actually dropped from yesterday's 9.0% to today's 8.3%.
May 14, 2008 9:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Nice!! I guess those 19 delegates she won don't amount to shit, especially after Obama rolls out a few more supers today and releases his April fundraising figures. How sad that no one is buying into her spin anymore, huh? Sad and pathetic.
May 14, 2008 9:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Poor thing.
At least they don't seem to be in attack dog mode against Obama at this point. They just seem to be pathetically deluded about having a snowball's chance in hell at being able to pull out a win here.
But, ya know, free country and all...Party On, Hillary.
May 14, 2008 10:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
So, that's 2 SDs today.
How many delegates will Hillary net from WV?
May 14, 2008 9:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm gonna say 0 - I bet the Obama camp have a whole crop of supers ready to come out and endorse today or tomorrow which will totally take the wind out of her sails. Of the 19 that she won in WV, she's already down 6 because of yesterday's endorsements (including the pledged delegate who defected). Then there are 2.5 superdelegates today so far (the one from Michigan doesn't count yet). I'd say by the end of the week she will be further behind than before WV, and her last best hope is Kentucky, which will be neutralized by Oregon. Stick a fork in her because she's done!
May 14, 2008 9:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
Come on.
No one has done more for Superdelegates than Barack Obama.
May 14, 2008 9:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you for being a part of the reality-based community.
May 14, 2008 9:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
"what is essentially"?
May 14, 2008 9:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ease off - that's an accurate statement. Here are a few synonmys of "essential": fundamental, basic, inherent, intrinsic:
Obama has what is fundamentally an insurmountable lead
Obama has what is basically an insurmountable lead
Obama has what is inherently an insurmountable lead
Obama has what is intrinsically an insurmountable lead
May 14, 2008 10:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Okay, okay... :)
May 14, 2008 10:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Right. To me it's like a basketball game where one side is up by 25 points with two minutes to play. I wouldn't have a problem with the announcer saying one side has "essentially" an insurmountable lead.
May 14, 2008 10:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
I guess we have one more week until that essentially insurmountable lead becomes just insurmountable.
May 14, 2008 10:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm scared that Clinton will start giving long rambling speeches about the initials "O., P. & E." and explain how she only drinks Crown Royale and beer and recycled bodily fuilds and rain water caught in open barrels.
The part that scares me the most is that since Peter Sellers died there appears to no one to stop HRC.
May 14, 2008 10:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
"A quick note on super-del policy here: Because Obama has what is essentially an insurmountable delegate lead, we won't be doing a post on every single super-del endorsement unless there's something remarkable about it. Instead, we'll do one or two daily posts wrapping up the day's super-del action."
How convenient. There is no excuse for you trying to gloss over each super delegate endorsement. Delegates is the name of the game, and each one has a different profile and regional story to tell. There is nothing more important, at this stage, to report on TPM than the individual stories of Super Delegates as they make their decisions.
I much prefer to hear what such super delegates have to say, than the "boiler plate" propaganda coming from spin doctors.
There is no excuse for TPM trying to diminish the coverage of each super delegate that announces an endorsement.
May 14, 2008 10:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree.
Superdelegates are important. Terry McCaullife's latest blathering not so much.
May 14, 2008 10:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Shrillary Spin Machine was in full bloom last night - did anyone catch Wolfson on CNN tell Blitzer that the reason Obama took his name off of Michigan was because he anticipated losing?
Who's ass did he pull that from?????
May 14, 2008 10:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
From raek's unhinged TPM posting to Wolfon's mouth.
May 14, 2008 10:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hilarious!
It's like playground rants. At this point, it's all just entertaining. I suppose it's a nice break before the real campaigning starts for the GE.
May 14, 2008 10:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
McCain assumes that he will be running his campaign against Obama's experience and lack of judgement . . . He said so on FAUX last night. Even Senator Wackadoo gets it.
What's up HRC? Just cuz her second 'landslide' state win held Obama to getting only FOUR endorsements before breakfast . .
.
We will be hearing that Hillary Clinton is winning the DEM nomination for 2008 three decades after Obama finishes up his second term as President.
May 14, 2008 10:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
Mmmmmm...playing the "lack of judgment" card would be a serious mistake for McCain. But, I hope he does it. Obama will pivot off that one big time.
May 14, 2008 10:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Some saddening news - Donna Brazille made note that a moajority of the rules committee that will decide on the fate of MI and FL the end of this month are Clinton supporters and that she fears the final decision will be partisan, not based on reality.
Oh, and did anyone else see Wolfson interrupt John King each time King mentioned "2025" needed to win? Wolfy would interrupt with "2209" - is this becoming some kind of subliminal thing for them? They think the more they say "2209," the more the minds of Superdels will absorb it subconsiously?
May 14, 2008 10:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Looks like Bill, a man I used to respect, got to the Rules Committee about MI and FL - I guess they owe him favors from his White Hous days.
Siggghhhhh - since when did the decision of a few becoming more powerful than the choice of many?
Oh yeah - since Hillary learned how to move goal posts again and again and again and again and...
May 14, 2008 10:37 AM | Reply | Permalink