« Obama Campaign Supports Florida Compromise That Would Net Hillary 19 Delegates | Home | Obama-Backer David Bonior: Split Michigan Delegates 50-50 Between The Two Candidates »

Obama Hits McCain Again: "We Don't Need More Leaders Who Can't Admit They've Made A Mistake"

And now for some real political drama.

On the trail today in South Dakota, Barack Obama will keep up the pressure on John McCain for wrongly saying that the troop numbers in Iraq are now at "pre-surge" levels, using McCain's refusal to admit error over the gaffe as yet another way to strap him to George W. Bush. From the prepared remarks sent over by the Obama campaign:

We all misspeak sometimes. I've done it myself. So on such a basic, factual error, you'd think that Senator McCain would just admit that he made a mistake and move on. But he couldn't do that. Instead, he dug in. And the disturbing thing is that we've seen this movie before -- a leader who pursues the wrong course, who is unwilling to change course, who ignores the evidence. Now, just like George Bush, John McCain refused to admit that he made a mistake. And that's exactly the kind of leadership that we've had through more than five years of fighting a war that should've never been authorized, and should've never been waged.

We don't need more leaders who can't admit they've made a mistake, even when it's about something as fundamental as how many young Americans are serving in harm's way.

It's clear that McCain's campaign misplayed this one. He could simply have said, "Yeah, yeah, yeah, I misspoke. I meant to say we're in the process of drawing down to pre-surge levels. Sorry. Now can we get back to the issues?"

But instead, the McCain camp tried to turn this into a debate about "verb tenses" -- the sort of error more often committed by Dems, and more often exploited by Republicans. Who knows how big an impact this will have, but the fact that Obama camp isn't letting up on this will cheer Dems wondering how aggressive the Obama team will be in the general.


47 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

How about that? The guy who has been holding back, staying positive instead of attacking fellow Dems doesn't mind attacking Republicans. Relentlessly. Perhaps Senator Clinton isn't the only aggressive Democratic candidate left after all.

This keeps up, O best be on guard against a sympathy backlash for the old man

I honestly think that a sympathy backlash will happen only if Obama hits McCain on either his military service or his age...which, of course, Obama will never do.

Okay, you are going to have to trust me on this one.

I want to answer a question that I know has been on many of your minds. I know that it has been on mine. Who is the twelfth Cylon?

I know that this may seem to have little to do with McCain. But I can't tell you how here how it does without spoiling the fun.

Unfortunately it is a story that requires words and photos.

"The Twelfth Cylon Revealed"
http://msa4.wordpress.com/

Quick, someone find a cafe for McCain to choke back some tears in.

This is a strong position from Obama. And, frankly, he can make this sort of case much more strongly than Hillary can, as she has been far less willing to admit making a mistake, either in her voting record, or in her campaign management.

user-pic

Not to mention her vote for the AUMF. She wouldn't be able to go after him the way that Obama can.

user-pic

And not only her vote but her refusal to admit it was a mistake and move on.

user-pic

I give again the only response I'm capable of giving until I get used to this:

{{{{{SWOON!}}}}

Haha, agreed, and seconded.

This is getting brutal

user-pic
This is getting brutal

Yep, sure is.
Ye-haaa!!!

They tried to marginalize a central issue. McCain's inability to keep the facts straight or lack of knowledge on the facts. You would think that after so many trips to Iraq and conversations with Betraeus that he would know what a shia and a sunni was and how many troops are still stationed in Iraq. Kinda like the Bush dislike for details.

I don't think to many people will have sympathy for someone trying to appear so tough.

I'm loving this. Mcain is going to need to be on teleprompter 24 - 7 if he wants to survive this election. If he makes the Sunni/Shia mix up just one more time now that Obama has trained his focus on the old man and Mcain will see what shock and aw really means.

McCain is looking like a sitting duck. This won't his last factual misstatement.

I am not sure why people are surprised that Obama has blistered McCain each time they've tangled.

Remember there is no signficant policy difference between Obama and Clnton. Thus any attack would have had to have been just the sort of personal irrelevant smear that Obama promised to end. This was his big Fall Dilemma if you'll recall. As Clinton's attacks mounted, some dems and not a few Obama supporters worried that his campaign's principles would prevent an effective response and indeed they tempered it.


Not so with John McCain. There are huge policy differences between Democrats and Republicans and Obama's shown that he intends to aggressively exploit our advantages every chance he gets

I am not surprised
I am looking forward to the Fall Election

I'm not surprised. I forget whether it was Axelrod or Plouffe who said a few weeks ago that Obama was holding back against Hillary and not particularly attacking her, but he would not go so easy on McCain.

And you're right that he'll do it more on policy grounds, which is a good thing. Obama talks to people like they're adults.

Furthermore, Obama has been on defense for the past 3 months (since Wisconsin) on three fronts (one of whom is a Democrat). Frankly, the fact that he has been able to maintain under this type of 360 attack (24/7) is pretty amazing.

Now, he only has to deal with McBush and the MSM who is determined to make this a "horse-race" and thus, raise all sorts of b.s. issues to try to close the gap.

user-pic

I've been making this point all along. Of course Barack is going to run differently against a Republican than he did against his fellow Democrats. Of course he is tougher than he displayed over the last 18 months. Of course he could've been a lot tougher on Hillary. Of course he was pulling punches. Of course he was keeping his powder dry.

The distinction between Barack and HRC is that he understands how favorable the winds are right now and he knows that the Primary was not the time to be divisive and destructive. We have the cards! WE DO! If you're a part of the we and you believe in the we, intra-party warfare is exactly what you should be seeking to avoid. Hillary is errr... was in the race for Hillary. That's all it was ever about to her. She doesn't give a damn about the party. Hell, she was President of the College Republicans! She's a Democrat the same way Bloomberg was a Republican: Because it seemed like the expedient thing to do...

You would think the Republican presidential candidate could come up with something better than "verb tenses."

It reminds me of the (justified) mockery of the parsing of what the meaning of "is" is.

Verb tenses are sometimes very, very important.

so I lost my butt when the Nasdaq crashed. And I kindof told my wife that we have made up the losses. Now, if my wife calls me on it (truth maybe nowhere close to even, and won't be for a while, if ever) all I have to do is review McCain's defense here. Certainly he, and his many smart advisers can lead me through it. I hope we come up with something more than 'verb tense' though.

nail his ass, big O. it's too bad most people who are interested in politics, not to mention the media, are being distracted by the absurd Rules and Bylaws Committee meetings that serve no purpose but to help Senator Clinton cling on a little longer to her delusions.

it's hilarious to see Obama turning the tables on McCain and dominating him so completely.

Meh, I wouldn't worry about that too much. It's not shaping up to be too good for Senator Clinton in that meeting. She's got some clappers in the audience, but the committee, by and large, is not amused.

oh i know that it's totally pointless, but that's my point. major media outlets are covering it all day instead of Obama jabbing McCain; it's a distraction from the GE.

user-pic
major media outlets are covering it all day instead of Obama jabbing McCain; it's a distraction from the GE.

Yep. Let's not forget that precious attention is being sucked away from this potentially important skirmish between Obama and McCain. Potentially important because it may work to set a tone. McCain misspeaks. Obama hammers him on it. That theme, McCain misspeaking, could creep into the narrative.

If attention were being paid to it outside of blogs.

The more that mcbomb talks about the war in Iraq, the bigger O's margin of victory in November. Simple as that!
mcbomb seems to be even dumber than bush which I had thought was impossible. What a schmuck!
As for Obama not staying positive David Sloane, go back and read his statement again. It's only negative if you're a fox news watching, republican, chicken hawk, and O has never spoken of unity with those knuckle-draggers.

My dad has early onset dementia... he's only 69. Well before we realized what was going on he began making a ton of errors about stuff that he should've known but also seemed like he could've just had a senior moment over (though I don't want a President who suffers from those either!).

We began to get worried when it was obvious that he knew that he screwed up, but would argue and make excuses over it anyway, either out of personal fear that he knew his mind wasn't working like it used to, or that he didn't want us to think it. It would just get worse whenever he was tired or troubled about something else. I don't see how in the heck McCain is going to handle this campaign when it really gets hot. He actually might end up getting a lot of sympathy/covering up from the press. It'll be interesting and a little sad to see this play out.

Sounds like Clinton in 98: Depends on what the meaning of the word "is" is.

The most effective attacks are the ones that undermine your opponent's strengths, not ones that exploit their weaknesses. Obama has definitely been following this strategy, first by using one of Hillary's biggest advantages---her involvement in Bill's administration---and used it to define her as a purveyor of the same old destructive, divisive politics.

Now he's doing the same damn thing with McCain. He's simultaneously dismantling his reputation as a straight talker and as an expert on national security. Nobody would care if Hillary's campaign raised this "verb tense" defense, because it's exactly the sort of self-serving legalistic parsing that we already associate with the Clintons.

What baffles me is how blatantly McCain is stumbling into this stuff. Clinton, for all her faults as a campaigner, put up a real fight to avoid being metaphorically consigned to the dustbin of history.

user-pic

I'm not the first to say this, but one good thing about Obama campaining against Clinton is that she's been a much tougher and smarter opponent than McCain ever could be.

user-pic

I sure hope the superdelegates are taking a break from the Hillary-Drama over the RBC to check this out. If any of them were holding back because they worried that Obama wouldn't hit McCain hard, those worries should be evaporating about now.

According to this guy, the SDs quit listening to Hillary after Indiana and NC.

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/5/30/12852/3644/583/524191

I agree that these hits by Obama will reinforce his position. Not to mention that even repubs are afraid "Democrats will win Landslide Victory" with Obama as the nominee.

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/hendrikhertzberg/2008/05/democrats-win-l.html

The idea that because the vote is so close, we should be fighting over who might win a bigger victory is ludicrous, especially since so many swing state SDs supported Obama early because he would help their down ticket races more.

This is not JUST about the presidential race and the SDs are aware of that too.

There is also a lesson to be found here for the very vocal supporters of both John Edwards and (especially) Dennis Kucinich. (Ron Paul fans also...)

The news media covers news. When someone polls below 5%, by definition they are not news. There was no conspiracy.

These guys employ good statisticians - they've probably got statisticians they haven't even used yet. They know what trend lines are. They know when to cut their losses on a non-viable candidate. If you can't translate your supporters' feelings into enough votes, you're not going to be in the papers for long.

Obama's taking McSame to the cleaners -- over and over again.

I like this. Too bad he didn't wait until Monday though.

I get the feeling that he might reference this on Monday. And Tuesday. And Wednsday. And so forth. McCain stumbled right into this one, and I don't see Obama letting up on him soon.

Refreshing that a Dem doesn't attack other Dems, but let's the guns go a-blazin' on legitimate issues against the Repub spin machine.
Nicely done, President-to-be Obama!

My man-crush on Obama continues to grow...

His comments on McCain's troop level inaninty were perfect.

Keep it going!

McCain: "It depends what the meaning of 'are' is."

Now that's some STRAIGHT-TALK(TM)!!

this is EXCELLENT NEWS! For McSame!!!
(apologies to idiotic)

More to the point, it's important to have someone who can not only admit a mistake, but also learn from it and do better afterwards.

Not learning from experience is a truly bad sign.

user-pic

Obama has been very clear that he'd run against the Republicans a lot harder than against a fellow Democrat. I think the Clinton campaign has been taking advantage of Obama's party loyalty. McCain will have no such advantage.

W3rd.
Delicious.

What is a tense verb?

This is the correct thing for Obama to be doing. John McCain, who presumes to be President and Commander-in-Chief, continues to make one uninformed gaffe after another about issues he, with his vast experience, should know something about. considering the mealy-mouthed dolt that currently runs the country (Bush), for us Americans we should expect, hope, nay demand, that the next President be clear and forthright and say EXACTLY what he means the FIRST time he states it. not have some fool Senator from Connecticut (Lieberman) whisper into our ear what the truth actually is. for an alleged 'straight-talker', McCain doesn't seem to be coming across as that. more like a 'second-talker', clarifying his position that he should've had to begin with. this will not do at all after Bush. Obama is real 'straight-talker' and speaks with forthrightness and intellect. i'll take his 'rhetoric' and the potential that offers over McCain's senility and 'experience' any day. oh, and thank you for service, Sen McCain.

Rock on Barack! I am looking forward, gleefully, to the general election.
W00F!

user-pic

Good move. You're absolutely right that it reinforces the connection between McCain and Bush, and in a way not commonly thought of.

However, the best part of this is that its going to push McCain, well-known for having an explosive temperment, that much closer to a melt-down. McCain has already made it known that he resents Obama making any sort of comment at all about military issues; its sort of as if McCain feels entitled to hold any position in that subject area without having to answer to anyone about it, particularly someone as militarily uncredentialed as Obama.

McCain is an extraordinarily weak Republican candidate. He can't manage his money, he doesn't appeal to the base, he's not particularly articulate, he's propped up by lobbyists and Washington insiders, and he promotes positions that are unpopular with some 60-70% of the public. Oh yeah, and he's 72 years old and can barely keep his temper in check.

Oh yeah, this campaign is gonna be gooood.

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address