« Rasmussen: GOP Sen. Dole In Dead Heat Against Democratic Nominee | Home | Obama Promoting Coal -- And Concern For Rural Voters -- In New Kentucky Ad »

Obama Gets California Super-Delegate

Today was a quiet time on the super-delegate front, with only one endorsement for Barack Obama and none for Hillary Clinton.

The Obama announced the support of Young Democrats of America board member Crystal Strait, who cited Obama's ability to get younger voters to the polls as a key reason for backing him.

According to the Obama camp's numbers, he is now 155 delegates away from clinching the nomination.


29 Comments

| Leave a comment
he is now 155 delegates away from clinching the nomination.
And there are 217 pledged delegates remaining, of which both Clinton and Obama will get approximately half, give or take.

Which means he needs less than fifty more superdelegates, of the 250 or so that remain undeclared.

Thus goes the slow but steady 'drip, drip, drip' of super delegates moving to Obama.

Can I start the wave?

THIS

IS

user-pic

C'mon guys!! You need to have an exclamation point after "NEWS"!!

That creates the pause for ironic effect from the idiotic original:

THIS IS EXCELLENT NEWS! FOR HILLARY!!

EXCELLENT

NEWS

FOR

FOR

HILLERY!!!!

!!

Good management skills on display from Obama folks. Made sure they retained the momentum, at the same time didn't make it look like a pile on. That's 25 delegate trickle since NC and IN.

A few more will join the ranks before the WV primary for sure.

!!!HILLMENTUMâ„¢!!!!

LOLOLOLOL!
What will you do in a few weeks when the Dem race is officially over?

Democratic primary will never be over!!!

Dec. 22, 2013: "New poll hailed by Clinton to be proves she is more electable. These three blind mice ran into a hole labeled 'Clinton' where as none of the mice ran to Obama's.' Clinton had this to say about poll results 'The fairy tale vote has long been ignored and I will not stand for it! Senator Obama has disregarded the rights of this group!'

As of Dec. 01 Clinton campaign in debt $6 trillion dollars, claiming they can still get elected and obliterate Iran for the money."

Democratic primary will never be over!!!

Dec. 22, 2013: "New poll hailed by Clinton to be proves she is more electable. These three blind mice ran into a hole labeled 'Clinton' where as none of the mice ran to Obama's. Clinton had this to say about poll results 'The fairy tale vote has long been ignored and I will not stand for it! Senator Obama has disregarded the rights of this group!'

As of Dec. 01 Clinton campaign in debt $6 trillion dollars, claiming they can still get elected and obliterate Iran for the money."

user-pic

I'm sure there will still be Hillary dead-enders to torment.

Hey, wapuche-- didn't want to ruin the wave, but I would like to say that Zorak rules. Love the avatar!

If he averages 5 per day, he will have this sewn up by the end of the month. If he can get to 8 per day, he can put things to rest on the 20th.

Btw - InTrade has Obama over 90% for the Dem nod now. As a reference, he was at 75% on Tues 5/6 and McCain is at 95% -he has had enough delegates for almost 2 months now.
Even better, they give Obama 20pts over McCain to win the Pres. McCain is at 37% and Obama is at 56%.

a shorter version of my critique of affirmative action:

AA bar pass rates at HBCs like Howard hover around 50%, and even at elite law skools are no higher than 60%. But at fourth tier law skools with insignificant AA enrollment, the bar pass rates are in the 80-85% range.

Something is surely wrong here.

Yes, compared to the 0% bar pass rate for monkeys, 50% doesn't seem so bad, but surely that is not the proper standard.

and surely law skools and law firms are mistaken to privilege race over competence. Certainly, the obligation of the profession is to provide the best possible legal counsel, not to provide legal counsel based on ethnicity.

If I keep reading this bullshit, pretty soon I will have to look up avatar in the dictionary.

Yilla's comment is complete screed and absurd.

First, Yilla's facts are incorrect--bar passage rates are not higher at fourth tier law schools than they are at accredited law schools with higher black enrollment.

Second, bar exams are state specific--to the extent that a school has a higher bar passage rate than another is irrelevant, unless the schools are located in the same state. A better metric would look at bar passage rates of a school compared to state average.

Third, Yilla has no factual basis to claim that there is insignificant enrollment of blacks at "fourth tier" schools.

Fourth, unaccredited law schools--fourth tier as defined by Yilla--often teach to bar exams, as opposed to teaching the law. Their goal is to become accredited, and the only way to do that is by maintaining a consistently high bar passage rate.

Yilla's comment doesn't necessarily deserve so much attention. At bottom, it is racist, which by definition means that it is ignorant. It's unfortunate if Yilla has been duped into believing this sort of information as part of the foundation for Yilla's racism.

I refer specifically to fourth tier schools like WVU and U Idaho, not unaccredited schools. And the bar exam is really pretty much the same in every state. Sure, NY is a bit harder than most, California is reputed to be tough, and DC's is supposed to be easy. But the differences in difficulty are very modest. And it's a fact, Howard's bar passage rate is about 50%. Idaho's is around 85%. AA students at my (Ivy) school had a pass rate of 65% max. These are just facts, and the conclusions are pretty painfully obvious.

Yilla:

Since law schools do not publish bar passage rates by race, I assume you went and spoke with all of the African American students in your law school to determine their bar passage rates. Otherwise, your conclusion is personal, not statistically significant, and likely designed to feed to your obvious bias.

Second, your estimation of bar passage rates is incorrect. They are published on the web, and while Howard's is lower than the average Ivy League, it also is pegged to New York, which is--by all measures--the most difficult of bar exams.

Third, bar passage is also a reflection of your ability to pay for bar passage courses. I went to a highly-ranked law school as well, and I can tell you that the only reason I passed the bar was because I plunked down the several thousand dollars needed to take BAR/BRI, not because my law school in any way prepared me to take the bar exam.

Fourth, since you purport to be an attorney, I would have thought quite clearly that you would not have believed that the bar exam measures--or is even a close proxy to--the quality of the attorney.

Finally, and most fundamentally, this is a post about Barack Obama winning a superdelegate in California. I hate to say it Yilla, but posting specious comments about the quality of Black Law Schools in this thread is the definition of racist. What are you trying to say? That Barack Obama or the people who vote for him are somehow less qualified because of your cherry-picked statistic about the quality of Black Law Schools?

oh, the bar is an amazingly easy test, I walked out early both days (NY). JFK, jr. failed it twice because he was a complete moron who never should have been admitted to NYU. But I havd pretty good access to info in AA bar passage rates at my school, and it was a big spread. And sure, being a great lawyer has little to do with passing the bar, but man if you can't pass a simple test after three years of law skool, I'm betting you ain't gonna be a very good lawyer. And it's a uniform exam, and if one distinct group of people routinely perform far worse than everyone else, I think it says something. Sorry, but facts be facts.

So, Yilla, the anonymous blogger with access to incredible amounts of information--and who cake-walked through the New York Bar after attending an Ivy League Law School--about the bar passage rates of people of all races, has concluded from his survey that....

Why not just say it Yilla: you think black people are intellectually inferior to white people, based upon your personal experience and survey of bar results. And don't just say it on the blogs, anonymously. Be proud of yourself. You've proven it. Publish a paper.

Unbelievable. Your logic proves one thing to me, Yilla--I'd never want you representing me.


well, no, I am saying that affirmative action and the glorification of silly crap like Kwanza and Cornel West gives black Americans the wrong incentives, and as a result they end up underperforming at just about everything.

And don't worry, you can't afford me.

Yilla-
Hillary Clinton has a Yale law education, and she failed the DC bar.

Should we be extrapolating something about white women, too?

user-pic

Yilla,

What does Alcoholics Anomynous have to do with this thread AND as they keep their membership rolls secret, how are you privy to these statistics?

Do you work for the NSA? Are you spying on the America people? Anyways, how do you know that it is not the sober folk that are failing the Bars in their repective states? The rovering alcoholics may be propping up the school's numbers.

Jack_hole.

One link to one statistic.

That's all I want to see.

Who will give it up?

I know where my money won't be.

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address