I do have to say this is an effective strategy, but I don't think this would cut into Obama's anti-war support in Oregon.

As much as I admire the Wilsons, this is not credible because their candidate VOTED FOR THE GODDAMNED WAR THEY WERE TRYING TO PREVENT. This ship has sailed ... if they honestly wanted to back the candidate that best represented their beliefs, they would back Obama, who was against the war as they were.

At least it isn't a deceptive attack ad.

I have no problem with Hillary staying in as long as she isn't using her Kitchen Sink Strategy.

Would that be the war that Hillary Clinton voted to approve?

The problem with this is that anti-war activists (of any age) are going to be perfectly aware that Clinton voted in favor of the war.

This makes the fact that no one wants the troops out more than Hillary (hello, Joe Lieberman!) somewhat uncompelling.

I don't understand why the wilson's support clinton. I know they're hacks and are loyal to her husband, but she voted for a war that both of them knew was complete BS!

I mean, what? It doesn't matter if she got it wrong on the war because her husband made me ambassador a decade ago?

You would think anti-war activist like the wilsons would support someone who was, you know, against the war.

Silly me. I should know you can't use logic to understand politics.

Irony: While Joe Wilson told us no uranium enrichment Hillary went ahead and voted for the war.

It's psuedo endorsement for Obama, whenever you remind Iraq people don't vote for Hillary.

It's too late for Clinton to run on the war in Iraq.

I think this is a terrible idea. All it does is remind people of the last 8 years.

It's clear to most Americans that there isn't going to be any substantive inquiry into how we got into Iraq. Dredging up the Wilsons only reminds Americans that our government is broken, and Clinton is a 30 year insider, and part of the problem.

I have no idea how this helps Clinton. I think it's a mistake.

Great American heroes.

I really wish she'd tried more things like this back in February, when it might have made a difference.

Actually, I think it is more accurate to say that rank and file Democrats have concluded that, despite the hit job on Wilson through Plame ordered by Cheney and others, they are a test case that suffering is not ennobling--if you love your reflection more than your country. Their behavior since has shown them to be limelight-loving partisan hacks who have little of substance to say about the war and a great deal to say about themselves. Remember how Wilson jumped onto Kerry's campaign at the time when he was a key player in the Bush administration subverting our government. Instead, he gave the White House cover to call it all a partisan attack. I think the cover picture on Vanity Fair that appeared a few months later said it all....their incessant pursuit of celebrity says a lot about their sense of national service. Politics is show business for ugly people, and they are not quite pretty enough for Hollywood.

Hey, will no one point out that Joe's name is on Blumenthal's 'buddy' list, along with at least one at this site?

It doesn't help that they look so sad and unconvincing in this ad. As an Oregonian who has spoken with many voters here, this will not help with those who oppose the war.

Joe's op-eds at the Huffington Post have been gratuitously and unjustifiably vitriolic against Obama.

Not so revered any longer. Ever since Joe started posting his breathless attacks on HuffPost, I think the anti-war Left has begun to see them in a new light.

The Wilsons are just disgusting CESSPOOL dwellers with Laryy Johnson et al.....

Oregonians have waited four decades for the chance to cast a meaningful vote in a Presidential primary. It wouldn't matter if WOODROW WIlson endorsed Hillary at this point -- we are not going to waste very many votes on her

PsyOps? Is the CIA still using these two?

Good ad. Great ad. Too little, waaaaay too late. It's OVER.

All this anti-Wilson stuff is really petty.

You don't have to like their pick for President to have some respect for both of them for what they did on YOUR behalf and on behalf of the people of the country. I'd wager they have sacrificed and genuinely suffered a great deal more as a result of their defiance of the Bush regime than anyone posting on this thread. But, because you don't like their pick for President (which isn't mine be a long shot)simply does not make it okay to denigrate, carp and generally attack them like a bunch of vile, nasty, sharp-toungued teenage girls who want to ostracize someone they no longer like. So grow up people and lay off the personal attacks on the Wilsons.

Way too little... way too late!

I can't blame Joe Wilson for wanting a position in another Clinton administration. But because of that I have never been able to see his vitriolic criticisms of Obama as anything like objective. They were in fact pure hatchet-jobs going far beyond fair criticism of Obama.

Wilson's main point has been that it was easy for Obama to oppose the war because he was not actually in the Senate to vote for it.

On the other hand, he maintains that Hillary was duped by Bush into voting for the war. Wilson has never explained why she has never repudiated her vote for the war afterwards.

Ironically, this very day, former Sen. Graham of Florida said Hillary lost the primary because of her vote for the war.