« Dem Senate Candidates Rolling Out First Ads For General Election | Home | McCain Finally Rejects Hagee's Support -- And Makes It All About Obama And Wright »

McCain Questions Obama's Lack Of Military Service

This is noteworthy: John McCain is now officially making a campaign issue of Obama's lack of military service.

On the Senate floor today, Obama hit McCain for not supporting Webb's 21st Century G.I. bill. In response, McCain released a lengthy statement. Here's the key line, buried in the middle of it:

I take a backseat to no one in my affection, respect and devotion to veterans. And I will not accept from Senator Obama, who did not feel it was his responsibility to serve our country in uniform, any lectures on my regard for those who did.

McCain is constantly said by pundits to be reluctant to bring up his Vietnam experiences in a political context. But this is now the third day in a row he's done this.

Yesterday and the day before he made oblique, but obvious, references to his torture in captivity. And today -- to my knowledge for the first time -- McCain directly attacked Obama for his lack of military service.

It's not an exaggeration to say that the McCain campaign message, boiled down as succinctly as possible, is this: "I'm more of a man than you are." Stay tuned for tomorrow's installment.

McCain's full statement after the jump.

"It is typical, but no less offensive that Senator Obama uses the Senate floor to take cheap shots at an opponent and easy advantage of an issue he has less than zero understanding of. Let me say first in response to Senator Obama, running for President is different than serving as President. The office comes with responsibilities so serious that the occupant can't always take the politically easy route without hurting the country he is sworn to defend. Unlike Senator Obama, my admiration, respect and deep gratitude for America's veterans is something more than a convenient campaign pledge. I think I have earned the right to make that claim.

"When I was five years old, a car pulled up in front of our house in New London, Connecticut, and a Navy officer rolled down the window, and shouted at my father that the Japanese had bombed Pearl Harbor. My father immediately left for the submarine base where he was stationed. I rarely saw him again for four years. My grandfather, who commanded the fast carrier task force under Admiral Halsey, came home from the war exhausted from the burdens he had borne, and died the next day. I grew up in the Navy; served for twenty-two years as a naval officer; and, like Senator Webb, personally experienced the terrible costs war imposes on the veteran. The friendships I formed in war remain among the closest relationships in my life. The Navy is still the world I know best and love most. In Vietnam, where I formed the closest friendships of my life, some of those friends never came home to the country they loved so well.

"But I am running for the office of Commander-in-Chief. That is the highest privilege in this country, and it imposes the greatest responsibilities. It would be easier politically for me to have joined Senator Webb in offering his legislation. More importantly, I feel just as he does, that we owe veterans the respect and generosity of a great nation because no matter how generously we show our gratitude it will never compensate them fully for all the sacrifices they have borne on our behalf.

"Senators Graham, Burr and I have offered legislation that would provide veterans with a substantial increase in educational benefits. The bill we have sponsored would increase monthly education benefits to $1500; eliminate the $1200 enrollment fee; and offer a $1000 annually for books and supplies. Importantly, we would allow veterans to transfer those benefits to their spouses or dependent children or use a part of them to pay down existing student loans. We also increase benefits to the Guard and Reserve, and even more generously to those who serve in the Selected Reserve.

"I know that my friend and fellow veteran, Senator Jim Webb, an honorable man who takes his responsibility to veterans very seriously, has offered legislation with very generous benefits. I respect and admire his position, and I would never suggest that he has anything other than the best of intentions to honor the service of deserving veterans. Both Senator Webb and I are united in our deep appreciation for the men and women who risk their lives so that the rest of us may be secure in our freedom. And I take a backseat to no one in my affection, respect and devotion to veterans. And I will not accept from Senator Obama, who did not feel it was his responsibility to serve our country in uniform, any lectures on my regard for those who did.

"The most important difference between our two approaches is that Senator Webb offers veterans who served one enlistment the same benefits as those offered veterans who have re-enlisted several times. Our bill has a sliding scale that offers generous benefits to all veterans, but increases those benefits according to the veteran's length of service. I think it is important to do that because, otherwise, we will encourage more people to leave the military after they have completed one enlistment. At a time when the United States military is fighting in two wars, and as we finally are beginning the long overdue and very urgent necessity of increasing the size of the Army and Marine Corps, one study estimates that Senator Webb's bill will reduce retention rates by 16%.

"Most worrying to me, is that by hurting retention we will reduce the numbers of men and women who we train to become the backbone of all the services, the noncommissioned officer. In my life, I have learned more from noncommissioned officers I have known and served with than anyone else outside my family. And in combat, no one is more important to their soldiers, sailors, marines, and airmen, and to the officers who command them, than the sergeant and petty officer. They are very hard to replace. Encouraging people not to choose to become noncommissioned officers would hurt the military and our country very badly. As I said, the office of President, which I am seeking, is a great honor, indeed, but it imposes serious responsibilities. How faithfully the President discharges those responsibilities will determine whether he or she deserves the honor. I can only tell you I intend to deserve the honor if I am fo rtunate to receive it, even if it means I must take politically unpopular positions at times and disagree with people for whom I have the highest respect and affection.

"Perhaps, if Senator Obama would take the time and trouble to understand this issue he would learn to debate an honest disagreement respectfully. But, as he always does, he prefers impugning the motives of his opponent, and exploiting a thoughtful difference of opinion to advance his own ambitions. If that is how he would behave as President, the country would regret his election."


Comments (79)

Obviously, McCain is trying to bamboozle the media into forgetting that he cut and ran on the GI Bill.

Just as obviously, the McCain campaign recognizes that this failure to vote today might come back and bit him in the ass, because these responses by McCain to Obama's comments are a bit on the "hysterical diatribe" side.

Here's hoping a flock of Senators stand up and tell McCain to shove it.

Yep, McCain's a cut-and-runner on the most important issues to the American people, the economy, the housing market, college education, lobbying reform, and veterans' benefits.

"I'm more of a man than you are."

This would seem to run counter to his ducking a vote on one of the most expansive bills for veterans' benefits. It certainly doesn't take a man to duck a vote this important---why was he so afraid of affording veterans full educational benefits today?

McCain's a maverick, baby. The conformist thing to do would've been to support a bill that offers educational benefits to military veterans. He's too much of a rebel to side with the squares on that one. He was probably too busy doing donuts in the parking lot in his Pontiac Firebird to go inside and vote.

Well played, sir :)

avatar

He drove a Corvette when he was stationed at NAS JAX in the 60's.

So McShame doesn't want to talk to Raoul Castro?


Wonder why?

http://www.usvetdsp.com/gifs/mcaincuban.jpg

McCain just rejected the endorsement of his kook McGee.

He released his medical records so they need to look at his brain scan.

His positions are all over the place.

Where did he explicitly reject Hagee?

Just broke on CNN.

He bashed Obama on his kook in the statement.

So both Obama and McCain rejected their pastors.

avatar

Ronald Reagan never served in the Military.

McBushCain, The Hybrid War Machine that runs on Ignorance, Bullshit, and Fear, has attacked the memory of Ronald Reagan.

Neither did the biggest warmonger in Washington, Dick Cheney.

Sounds like the McSame campaign is really reaching here, seeing/hoping that the media will be distracted from the true issue: McBush didn't show up for the new GI Bill that his boy Bush is against.

And Dubya only served when he didn't have other plans.

avatar

Dubya only served on the days when he could drag his alcohol-and-cocaine addled body out of bed.

But Reagan played a cowboy in the movies. Doesn't that count for something?

Yes he did:

After completing fourteen home-study Army Extension Courses, Reagan enlisted in the Army Enlisted Reserve on April 29, 1937, as a private assigned to Troop B, 322nd Cavalry at Des Moines, Iowa. He was appointed Second Lieutenant in the Officers Reserve Corps of the Cavalry on May 25, 1937, and on June 18 was assigned to the 323rd Cavalry.

Reagan was ordered to active duty for the first time on April 18, 1942. Due to his nearsightedness, he was classified for limited service only, which excluded him from serving overseas. His first assignment was at the San Francisco Port of Embarkation at Fort Mason, California, as a liaison officer of the Port and Transportation Office. Upon the approval of the Army Air Force (AAF), he applied for a transfer from the Cavalry to the AAF on May 15, 1942, and was assigned to AAF Public Relations and subsequently to the 1st Motion Picture Unit in Culver City, California. On January 14, 1943 he was promoted to First Lieutenant and was sent to the Provisional Task Force Show Unit of This Is The Army at Burbank, California. He returned to the 1st Motion Picture Unit after completing this duty and was promoted to Captain on July 22, 1943.

In January 1944, Captain Reagan was ordered to temporary duty in New York City to participate in the opening of the sixth War Loan Drive. He was assigned to the 18th AAF Base Unit, Culver City on November 14, 1944, where he remained until the end of World War II. He was recommended for promotion to Major on February 2, 1945, but this recommendation was disapproved on July 17 of that year. He returned to Fort MacArthur, California, where he was separated from active duty on December 9, 1945. By the end of the war, his units had produced some 400 training films for the AAF.

Of course you can say he was never in a combat position or in a theatre of combat, but Reagan did enlist and serve in the military.

avatar

Reagan did serve in the military. He was in the Army making training films. It is rumored that he tried for a Purple Heart when he got hit by a swinging microphone boom.(I just now started the rumor.)

I take a backseat to no one in my affection, respect and devotion to veterans. And I will not accept from Senator Obama, who did not feel it was his responsibility to serve our country in uniform, any lectures on my regard for those who did.

For starters, military service isn't compulsory. Secondly, it's not like Obama was a stockbroker. Even if he was, it doesn't reflect on his political acumen. He supported Webb's GI Bill, McCain didn't.

As a Virginian, I'm not the biggest fan of the Webb for VP idea, although I support him fully. But if McCain keeps this up, I'd fully welcome this battle royale.

That last paragraph is just astounding in its vitriol....McCain is going to get nastier and nastier, and try to pull Obama down into the muck, until there is no longer any distinction between the type of campaign Obama is running and the dirty tricks, smears and attacks McCain is and will be using.

Tread carefully, Sen. Obama, this is a trap. Please don't fall in. Remember what that Ms. Weiss said....(just the 1st 10 seconds captures the sentiment I am going for)


http://youtube.com/watch?v=AeBpPjIlaEw

No, this isn't true. Obama has attacked McCain's misguided jokes of policies, never his character. Obama makes it clear every time.

I've said it before and I'll say it again.

I think McCain is going down just like Dole did in '96, stumbling off the stage (literally and figuratively), perhaps to do viagra ads or some other silliness.

This statement here makes me feel even more solidly in that. Bush I tried to use military service against Clinton I, as did Dole. Both failed, which is in part why Bush's AWOL didn't hold him back.

It won't be any more effective now. Especially as exhausted as our military and family relatives are becoming with two wars/occupations overseas.

wow, it's kinda soon for such deperation. thanks, mcThuseleh!

avatar

If McCain wants to play that way, Obama ought to say, "Maybe John McCain doesn't realize it, but not everyone who serves in the military can be lucky enough upon returning from war to immediately dump his wife for a young heiress worth $100,000,000, buy eight houses, and go to Washington, D.C., for 30 years to make speeches in Congress and have great health care on the American taxpayer's dime. Not everyone who serves in the military has the inside connections that come with having a father and grandfather who were admirals in the Navy. Maybe John McCain didn't need a G.I. bill to go to college and get decent jobs and health care, but many of our brave veterans do."

Zing!

Ummm. No that is not a good idea.

Anger only leads to the dark side...

avatar

Yeah he's ducking and dodging.

And I still can't figure out how not voting on the bill wasn't the WORST of both worlds.

But I hope we're not going to note every time MCCain mentions his military service against a man like Obama who has never served. They "say" he ex-Naval officer, war hero ex-POW and not wdoesn't like to bring it up. So what? They "say" he's no friend of the religious right.

You'd have to be a total idiot to be a highly-decorated, work the hell out of it--especially in a time of war.

Just seems silly to me.

That's why Obama needs a national security VP. A Clark, a Webb, and all of this just goes away.

avatar

The attacks made against John Kerry for CLAIMING his military service gives him the EDGE for Presidency -- should now be used against McCain.

Bring out the 527s and how McCain attacked families wanting to bring home EVERY POW in Vietnam.

avatar

Who do they think is going to read these long ass statements? Jesus, they need to fire their press person ASAP.

avatar

Shhh. Let them make them even longer, and give them a raise.

McLame should get The Chimp and Shooter to join him on the campaign trail to press this line of attack. Chimpy's and Shooter's records of distinguished military service, bravely serving their country in battle when cowards such as John Kerry faked his own injuries, will really help him. Oh, wait, never mind.

2 words - Abu Ghraib.

That will have shattered the illusion of that military service is some sort of morally superior commitment to our country's standing in the world.

avatar

That a little strong and misplaced, don't you think? there are many who are and who have served our military.

avatar

served with honor and decency

avatar

Wooo. Obama must be the man. These new McCain trolls are something else. I honor McCain's service, but today he was too much of a political coward to vote for GIs. Instead, he stood with the rich republicans who don't want their taxes to go up -- even to help a vet. How sad. How pathetic.

avatar

This is standard Republican fare - lip service for "Supporting the Troops" until it actually comes to parting with one of your own nickles.

I said what I had to say here.

Except that Bush actually did serve (albeit in the champaign brigade while McCain was being tortured, and then went AWOL).

avatar
Except that Bush actually did serve ...

Yeah, right! His "service" consisted of ripping-off the taxpayers for $1,000,000+ in flight training -- then promptly getting himself grounded in disgrace for refusing to take his flight physical (a.k.a. refusing to pee in a cup).

Not to mention the disappearing act that would have landed anyone without his daddy's connections in Fort Leavenworth.

Can't wait to see if Rush, Hannity, O'Pervert, and the rest of the repug 'Nam draft dodgers dare to comment on Barack's lack of uniformed service.

...McBU__SH__!

LK

Listen, John. If you can lay a great big bear hug and smooch on a guy who deserted while you were flying over Vietnam, and if you don't have a beef against "Five-Deferment" Cheney and his blood-lust for sending more of America's youth into the giant meat grinder in Iraq, then you've got nothing to say about a guy who chose to work as an inner-city community organizer rather than enlist during peacetime.

I served during wartime, so I can say that. Now stop making excuses for turning your back on America's veterans and just shut your damned, decrepit pie-hole!

And one more thing, McCain. You just kicked a fucking hornet's nest. If you think Obama doesn't have strong support from veterans and service members, you're sadly mistaken:

"Does">http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/20080521/us_time/doesmccainhaveaveteransproblem>"Does McCain Have a Veterans Problem?"

"Obama and McCain's GOP rival, the antiwar presidential candidate Congressman Ron Paul, actually beat McCain in donations from the four branches of active military this year, according to a study by the Center for Responsive Politics."

Okay, how about now:

"Does McCain Have a Veterans Problem?"

FLAG THE REAL ISSUES, TPM!

This posting misses the real issue in McCain's vitriolic response to Obama this afternoon! Obama was polite to McCain, honoring his service as usual, when he took strong issue with his opposition to the Webb GI Bill. McCain's response was angry, intemperate, vitriolic -- and basically questioned the patriotism of anyone who dares to comment on military issues in the USA without having served in the military. That is a pretty amazing stance for McCain to take -- especially after supporting Bush et al who never served, in fact EVADED service.

All of us on the progressive side need to take STRONG notice when McCain displays an explosive temper -- a real issue about him -- and we should take extreme offense at his suggestion that Americans must serve in the military to be patriotic full citizens. How can one say that Obama, who chose to go into community service after law school, is any less patriotic?

Don't get into so much meta-commentary TPM, that you overlook the real issues! Flag them.

Theda Skocpol, Cambridge MA

I agree... the real issue here is how easy it is to get into McCain's head and set him off.

It's going to make for some great reality TV once the debates start.

Great point McCain has the intellect of a two year old. Hit his button and he blows up like a grenade.

How about...

"If John McCain thinks that one has to serve in the uniform to be POTUS, then he should be lobbying his 'friends' in the House to initiate articles of impeachment against Dick Cheney. I certainly agree that Dick Cheney is not fit to be President, but not because Dick Cheney didn't put on the uniform."

Well, since I served my six years I guess it's okay for me to tell McCain to go fuck himself. The honor I afforded him for not using his service as a political shield against criticism is now gone. He wants to be my leader? Fuck him. He's no longer worthy of that honor in my eyes, if he ever was...and if this is his true colors, he definitely never was.

I agree that if we have an all volunteer military, denigrating people non-service is illegitimate.

Also, Bush did serve in the national guard. It's fair to say he evaded his duties as a national guardsman, however. But I think even raising the issue is a distraction. Making the point about Mr. Cheney, and otherswho actively avoided the draft is good enough.

By the way, combat veterans who supported the bill
Webb (D),Inouye (D), Kerry (D), Akaka (D), Carper (D, Lautenberg(D), Hagel(R) Warner (R), Stevens (R)
Opposed: McCain (R)

Non-combat vets For (including guard and reserve):
D's: Bingaman, Dodd, Harkin, Johnson, Kohl, Nelson, Reed
R's:Craig,Inhofe, Isakson, Roberts, Specter, Wicker

Non-combat Vets Opposed:
(all R's) Bennett, Graham, Cochran, Enzi, Lugar, Sessions

Combat vets: 9-1 (D:6-0; R: 3-1)
Noncombat:13-6 (D: 7-0 R: 6-6)

A source for vet status in the Senate is here: http://grunt.space.swri.edu/senatevet.htm

I can't say I know for a fact this is 100% accurate, but it sounds right.

great post!!!...I bet John feels very manly now..

McCain has no control over his temper. The debates this fall are going to be a blast, watching Obama press Grandpa Bonkers' buttons until he explodes on live television.

There is another key point here and that is Webb's bill will hurt the retention numbers because the miltary poeple will opt out for college...McCain's view is that we need to be feeding the war machine!

Wow, he seems to be very angry. Makes me think that this McCain guy might be a bit of a hothead or something.

No wonder he doesn't like diplomacy.

avatar

Oh, please!!! Obama and I are the same age, although I am a white, middle-class woman (supposedly Hillary's demographic but instead a feminist Obama supporter). I'm sure Obama registered for the potential draft back when Carter reinstated it in 1980, but during our 20s, we were not at war (save for the oh-so-brief invasion of Grenada). With our supposedly strong all-volunteer army, why should someone with aspirations toward community organizing and a legal career not serve his country on the domestic front through social service? I respect Sen. McCain's time in uniform, but the Vietnam War era was significantly different than the 1980s. To fault Obama for not voluntarily joining the military during a time of peace is ridiculous (especially in light of Bush and Cheney's duck and dodges when we were at war).

avatar

"I am running for the office of Commander-in-Chief..." Doesn't that say it all? I thought he was running for President. Commander-in-chief (of the armed forces, not of the United States - another frequent misunderstanding) is just part of the job description. It would be like a Vice Presidential candidate saying "I'm running for President-of-the-Senate."

The country should be truly frightened that someone is getting this close to being President who sees the office entirely through a prism of military action.

avatar

Oh, so now only military folks can run for President? What is this, a junta?

And what's with McCain's tone? He's the most belligerent candidate I've ever heard. It's never, "I respectfully disagree with my good friend, the Senator from Illinois," it's always, "Once again he shows how dangerously ignorant he is."

McCain's got some mighty short arms to be picking fights.

I guess that disqualifies Tim Pawlenty, Mitt Romney, Rudy Giuliani, Bobby Jindhal, Fred Thompson, and Joe Lieberman from commenting on military affairs as well and definitely disqualifies them from consideratoin for VP. Or McCain is just full of crap. Again.

In the words of 5 time draft dodger "So?"

McBush is just trying to deflect his shameless stance in not supporting the new GI Bill. McBush is fine with keeping our brave soldiers in Iraq for 100 year war/occupation but does not want to support the troops after they have served this country. The worse part is that his reasons are totally cynical. He does not want to give the troops options after they serve because he wants reenlistment to be one of their only options. McCain is a warmonger and hypocrite pure and simple.

Hey McBushcain:

The three idiots you are spending the weekend with on your VP search- Romney, Crist and Jindal- they did not serve either. The unpatriotic bastards.

The fact is Obama and I are one year apart in age. Believe me probably 1 in 1000 who had the ability to get into a good college chose the military.

avatar

We need to hit back at this sort of under handed smear by McCain. The following steps need to be taken:

1. Line up those veterans supporting the bill with Obama simply to say that Obama has a very good understanding of what it takes to support the veterans of this war. They could also ask whether McCain is questioning their right to speak to the needs of the veteran.

2. Obama should make a public statement noting that the vast majority of the senate and house supported this bill. He should note the number who were veterans. He should then talk about hypocrisy of criticizing him for not having served during a time of peace while McCain supported a Vice-Presidential candidate who had five deferments and simply dismissed his failure to serve during a time of war with the statement that he simply had better things to do.

3. Obama could really make a point of saying that had there been better educational benefits, he might very well have served in the military to gain the benefits.

4. Obama should hit the necessity of having a citizen army by encouraging not only those who want to make it a career but also those citizen soldiers who have proven of such value in service to their nation.

Anybody got a master list of Chicken Hawks in the Bush administration?

avatar
Anybody got a master list of Chicken Hawks in the Bush administration?

http://awolbush.com/whoserved.html

http://awolbush.com/images/werent-soldiers.jpg


...a veritable Who's Who of Neocons,

LK

How many of our Presidents have been former soldiers or sailors?

Not very many.

And I will not accept from Senator Obama, who did not feel it was his responsibility to serve our country in uniform ...

This is an opportunity for Obama to dispel the idea that military service is the only (or even the chief) mode to "serve our country." After all the majority of citizens do it in some other way. It would not only be correct, it would be politically profitable.

Put another way: Would Obama have served his country better by doing what he has done for society or by getting himself blown up for a useless cause in the Middle East?

Actually, the answer is many. Since WWII only Clinton did not serve. In the first half of 20th Taft, Wilson, Harding, Coolidge, Hoover, Roosevelt did not. Only McKinley and T.Roosevelt did. The think the majority in the 19th century did serve as well.

Not that it matters. History plays a huge part of this. But we should get our facts straight.

avatar

I wish McCain had felt so strongly about prior military service when George W. Bush and Richard Cheney were running. (Note: I am retired military and a Vietnam vet. I do not consider Bush's TX Air NG time as military service. In fact, in his case, I consider it military disservice since he wasted hundreds of thousands of tax payers dollars and was a total deadbeat.)

Chris Matthews brought up McBush's hypocrisy today. He said that McBush defended the chicken hawks time and time again on his show saying that it was OK that people like Cheney did not serve and still sent our soldiers to war.

McFu: The Ancient Art of Flip Flopping

Well, if Obama isn't allowed to criticize McCain for not supporting the bill, would it be okay if the VFW did?

In the VFW's own words: "VFW Demands Passage of New GI Bill for 21st Century"

Or how about the American Legion? Is it okay if they tell McCain he's not supporting vets: American Legion Breaks with Bush, McCain on GI Bill

You're out-gunned, Grampy. Back the fuck off.

What's the difference any way? The Democrats have nominated two veterans only to lose to Bush who dodged the draft because of daddy's influence. The last Democratic president was a draft dodger. I just don't think military service matters to most voters.

Peoples' Ship Songbird at anchor, Da Nang Harbor
http://www.mrfa.org/Pics/mrf_pics/CoastalRaiders-005.jpg


Betrayal is his middle name

avatar

"How many of our Presidents have been former soldiers or sailors?"

Well, if you want to be technical...

In my lifetime the following people who were elected president were former soldiers and sailors:

Harry S Truman (doughboy, WWI)
Dwight D. Eisenhower (duh)
John F. Kennedy (Navy, WWII)
Lyndon B. Johnson (I think Navy, WWII)
Richard M. Nixon (Navy, WWII)
Gerald R. Ford (Navy, WWII) [not elected]
Jimmy Carter (Navy, submarine, peacetime)
Ronald W. Reagan (Army, WWII)
George H. W. Bush (Army Air Corps, WWII)
Al Gore (I think Army, Viet Nam)

And a few others in the past...George Washington, Andrew Jackson, Zachary Taylor, Abraham Lincoln, U.S. Grant, Theodore Roosevelt...and a bunch whose service I don't know about, I suspect.

Just wanting to set the record straight.

Peace,
Paul

avatar

I believe that McCain's time in captivity destroyed his mind. What are the odds that he'll die of old age before the election ?

avatar

As to military service, how many politicians have served who were born too late to be subject to the draft ?

avatar

Given Sen. Obama's age I don't see how you could criticize his lack of military service as an issue. Being in his late 40's he was never exposed to the draft nor was he of an age to join up at any time when we were in a conflict of consequence. Persons in his age group, and particularly those gainfully employed, have very low rates of enlistment.

McCain is making an issue of something that is meaningless in any normal context. And if you want to make a big deal of this it's not like Obama was out there making tons of dough in the private sector. He was occupied serving the public good in areas of Chicago where he was able to make a difference. McCain is just so full of it.

avatar

Is there anybody out there who thinks McCain will make a good president? Anybody? I've looked over a lot of blogs and everyone thinks he's a total idiot. I really wonder if this has occurred to the Republican party yet. The only people who like him are the really ignorant folks who don't have a clue about what is going on. If Obama gets half a chance to get his message across, McCain will go down in history as the biggest loser ever.

avatar

No, McCain, NO! Don't claim to care about vets while everyone watching you screw them over- don't you get it? You're supposed to make Obama look BAD in comparison to you...

A succinct, logical rationale for his stance on this particular piece of legislation...until the last paragraph.

Post a Comment

Poll Tracker

View more polls »
Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address