McCain Finally Rejects Hagee's Support -- And Makes It All About Obama And Wright
The controversy surrounding John Hagee's endorsement has finally gotten to John McCain. In the wake of new quotes being circulated by the Huffington Post in which Hagee called Hitler an instrument of God's will, McCain has now rejected Hagee's support.
"Obviously, I find these remarks and others deeply offensive and indefensible, and I repudiate them," McCain told CNN in a statement. "I did not know of them before Reverend Hagee's endorsement, and I feel I must reject his endorsement as well."
That matter aside, McCain was sure to bring this back to Barack Obama, insisting that his active effort to get Hagee's support originally was not nearly as bad as Obama's associations with Jeremiah Wright.
"I have said I do not believe Senator Obama shares Reverend Wright's extreme views. But let me also be clear, Reverend Hagee was not and is not my pastor or spiritual advisor, and I did not attend his church for twenty years. I have denounced statements he made immediately upon learning of them, as I do again today."
Late Update: Hagee has now issued a formal withdrawal of his endorsement, but it reads more like he's stepping aside rather than actually dropping his support:
"I am tired of these baseless attacks and fear that they have become a distraction in what should be a national debate about important issues. I have therefore decided to withdraw my endorsement of Senator McCain for President effective today, and to remove myself from any active role in the 2008 campaign," he said in a statement."I hope that the Senator McCain will accept this withdrawal so that he may focus on the issues that are most important to America and the world."















Now it's time for evangelicals to get all riled up about how McCain comes seeking them when he needs them and then tosses them out after he's used them.
May 22, 2008 4:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's very interesting. I think that McCain is still doing pretty well as the last republican. Still, you can't argue with these poll results.
http://www.votenic.com
May 22, 2008 4:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
GO AWAY SPAMMER! SHOO!
May 22, 2008 4:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Fuck off spammer.
May 22, 2008 4:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Die, spammer, die!
May 22, 2008 4:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Avenge Hagee
Launch the Vietnamese Peoples' Fast Boat Songbird!
Vietnam Veterans Against McCain, For Mentum
http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnmccain.com/
May 22, 2008 7:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Republicans deserve to loose in 2008 because they squandered the goodwill the World felt for us after 9/11, lied and distracted us against the rightful war on terror to this senseless war in Iraq, screwed up our economy with the Bushanomics 'shop 'till you drop' patriotic mantras, and have failed to apologize for Bush's stubbornness, failed foreign, national, and economic policies.
HOWEVER, not even the Republicans deserve to as poorly represented as they will with McCain. They may want to re-think their winner take all the delegate vote primaries because their system caused them to default into the worse choice ever.
McCain has consistently demonstrated throughout his political career that he is guilty of double-speak. He consistently attempts to appease whatever audience he's standing in front of at the time.
McCain graduated 3rd from the bottom at Naval Academy, not ready for prime time in 2000 and past his prime in 2008 - - clueless on the economy, foreign policy, flip-flops, double-speaks, extremist and flawed spiritual advisors, close ties and friends with unscupulous lobbyist - - at best he’s an enigma and at worse he’s the 16 personalities of Sybil.
May 22, 2008 10:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
He "denounced" Hagee's statements upon immediately hearing them?
I guess giggling and saying "I'm anti anti anything" could qualify as a denunciation in someone's world.
May 22, 2008 4:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hmm judgment much?
How on Earth did he earn the GOP nomination? He can't even do pandering well and that's their whole game.
May 22, 2008 4:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
McSame is such a weenie. He's not a very good campaigner, and he comes close to losing his cool when pressed on anything that strays from his talking points.
No wonder so many Rs hate his guts.
May 22, 2008 4:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
"He wasn't my pastor, he was just someone I was shamelessly cozying up to regardless of his beliefs because I desperately wanted to court evangelicals."
May 22, 2008 4:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yep. He rolled over for the evangelicals, and then rolled back over for the Jewish vote when the Hagee comments on the Holocaust came out.
May 22, 2008 4:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
"If you evangelicals wanted my full support, maybe you should've moved to Florida."
May 22, 2008 4:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ha!
Busted!
May 22, 2008 4:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain is a far better man than Obama ever will be. Too bad he'll never be president.
May 22, 2008 4:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
You are wrong that he is a better man than Obma, though I agree McBush will never be President (thankfully).
Real men don't call their wives cunts.
May 22, 2008 4:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Perfect Rovian strategy, poorly executed.
Your'e too late, McLame. You have no rhythm.
;)
May 22, 2008 4:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
No you sleazy, shameless hypocrite. You only actively sought this scumbag's endorsement of your presidential campaign.
And you didn't seem to have a problem with Hagee's other hateful statements. You're still fine with Parsley's endorsement. And you didn't have a problem speaking at Falwell's university even though he said gays caused 9/11.
May 22, 2008 4:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
There was some former Bush aide on Dan Abrams last night, a self-proclaimed evangelical, who said that McSame has botched his outreach to evangelicals by courting favor with wackos like Hagee. And that McCain doesn't understand evangelicals.
Music to my ears.
May 22, 2008 4:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Makes sense. He doesn't understand the difference between Shiite and Sunni muslims either.
May 22, 2008 4:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nor the economy. Nor the environment. Nor campaign finance. Wait. What DOES he understand?
May 22, 2008 4:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
"My friends, I don't know shit and I'm proud of it. Vote for me because I'm a straight talking maverick war hero. Pay no attention to what I say or what I'll do. Just vote for me anyway."
May 22, 2008 4:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
he understands war and why we have to keep fighting because if we dont, "al qaeda will tell the world they defeated us". and we all know how seriously the civilized world takes the opinions of al qaeda.
May 22, 2008 4:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Torture. He understands torture. That's the entirety of his campaign. "Vote for me. I was tortured."
May 22, 2008 4:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
And I support it!
May 22, 2008 4:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Right. He was against it before he was for it.
May 22, 2008 5:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, he was against it when it was him getting tortured. Now that it's those other people, fire up the car battery!
May 22, 2008 5:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
So has he flopped again, this time away from the "agents of intolerance" religious right, after the repug primaries were over?
And the corporate media will continue to portray him as an unwavering straight shooter.
May 22, 2008 4:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
But I think you're on to something about him being like Dole.
Moreover, he is a walking time bomb waiting to explode, and given his campaign thus far, it will happen, and it won't be pretty from his standpoint.
May 22, 2008 4:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not so sure how pretty it will be. He so far hasn't had the dignity of Dole who announced his Senate retirement (after a long career there) while he was running for President.
And you're right about that temper. He's clearly not as decent a guy as Dole was.
But Dole was a bumbler who referred to himself in thrid person, and he did literally fall off a stage, that one act freezing in time the weakenss of his campaign.
I predict something will happen (temper explosion etc), a pattern will emerge, that portrays to the public that Mccain likewise is just too much of a dinosaur for the white house.
May 22, 2008 4:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
i think McCain's biggest weakness is that you dont really know where he stands or why he reached the position he did. I mean, at least with Kerry he told you why he changed his mind. John McCain changes his mind and then pretends he's held the position all along.
If you go back and read and look at the videos and things, you'll see he's been on almost every side of every issue at one time or another.
I wonder how long before the "flip-flopper" perception that hounded Kerry will catch up to McCain.
May 22, 2008 4:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
As pointed out here or on Andrew Sullivan (I can't remember) there is a big difference between a spiritual relationship (Obama - Wright) and a political relationship (McCain - Hagee). The latter I care about much more.
May 22, 2008 4:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
will he blame early onset alzheimers for the fact that he couldn't youtube hagee or discover before hand he said some ridiculous shit.
he knew.
someone should ask him how, if he truly did not know, does that reflect on his ability as a potential president.
how many days until this man's head explodes?
May 22, 2008 4:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's entirely possibly he didn't know. Fuck, the guy apparently doesn't know he has lobbyists running his campaign. He's a joke.
May 22, 2008 4:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
He also was quoted in saying, during the first time he voted against MLK as a national holiday, that he didnt KNOW about Martin Luther King and his importance.
He is a moron, imo.
May 22, 2008 5:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
tick-tick-tick-tick-tick-tick....
May 22, 2008 4:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
I respect Obama's thoughtful response to the Wright issue, and his reluctance to cast an important mentor aside, even in the face of the political damage it caused him. I have no respect for McCain shamelessly accepting Hagee's endorsement in the hopes of pandering to the religious right, and then just as quickly doing a 180 degree turn when he realized it might hurt his chances.
May 22, 2008 4:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Change "accepting" to "seeking out."
May 22, 2008 4:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
that's funny, I changed "seeking out" to "accepting" because I couldn't remember how it came about and I though the point stood either way.
If he sought it out, that's even worse, and casts some serious doubt as to the guy's competence. I mean, Jesus, if you Google Hagee you can find something absurdly offensive he said in about 3 seconds.
May 22, 2008 4:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, he definitely sought out Hagee's endorsement and it's definitely worse.
May 22, 2008 4:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
If this is "straight talkin," then I'm the Emperor of Freedonia.
May 22, 2008 4:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
"...hail hailr Freedonia, land of the braaaave... aaaannnddd... freeeeeeeeeee!!!"
Had to do some Margaret Dumont there... speaking of which.. Ms. Dumont always played moneyed upper-=class pills who were involved in sleazy hacks trying to get at her money and station for their own ends... hmmmm... perhaps we should start referring Cindy McCain as Mrs. Teasdale and John McBush as Rufus T. Firefly.
On second thought no... Ms. Dumont never stole drugs from her non-profit and Groucho was at least a respectable curmudgeon and I 'm sure he never called her a cunt.
May 22, 2008 4:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
In the immortal words of Bugs Bunny, "What a Maroon!"
May 22, 2008 4:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
How many debates did Clinton-Obama have? I want at least twice that between McCain and Obama. They're going to be classic.
May 22, 2008 4:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
they had 21. (four or five of them were just obama and hillary).
so anywhere between 8 and 40 debates should do. seeing as how there are only 24 weeks left till the election, someone should get busy. I could live with 2 debates a week from now till november.
May 22, 2008 4:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Now it's Lieberman's turn to start talking.
"He is a Ish Elokim, a man of God and those words really fit him...like Moses he's become a leader of a mighty multitude, even greater than the multitude that Moses led from Egypt to the promised land."
May 22, 2008 4:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Also from Lieberman:
"Vote for the shegetz, not the schvartza."
May 22, 2008 4:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oy vey!
May 22, 2008 4:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Moses hated jews? who knew?
May 22, 2008 5:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
McBushSame is in trouble!!!
And the rejection comes too late, and it will be a good leverage if the McBushSame camp is using rev Wright!!!
May 22, 2008 4:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Clinton does not have a religious kook.
Just sayin.
May 22, 2008 4:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
But she does have Bill. And he's got to count for at least 3 religious kooks, no?
May 22, 2008 4:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yep, she does, Doug Coe.
May 22, 2008 4:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nor does she have a shot at the Democratic Nomination.
Just sayin'.
May 22, 2008 4:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Neither do I, and I have about as much chance of getting the nomination as Hillary does.
May 22, 2008 4:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Clinton who?
May 22, 2008 4:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
may i ask if you are also a frequent commenter on the Fighting Fundamental Forums?
May 22, 2008 7:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is too rich.... There's still time for the Republicans to nominate someone else right? No? They are going to go down HARD in the fall.... He's going to "out Dole" Dole. This i
May 22, 2008 4:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
I just had to.
Joe stopped tucking me in at night.
May 22, 2008 4:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't understand the flap over McCain's pastor. That a candidate's pastor has no relevance has already been established on Obama blogs again and again and again and again and...
May 22, 2008 4:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's a completely different relationship. Wright-Obama had a purely spiritual relationship, Hagee-McCain have a purely political one. One is relevant to running for President, the other is not.
May 22, 2008 4:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
it's not his pastor or his spiritual adviser, just some kook he thought he needed to get more votes. Hillary can just go with the voices in her head.
May 22, 2008 4:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Priceless!
May 22, 2008 4:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
What we are now (and have been for weeks) seeing is the trailer to the upcoming comedy "Mr. Magoo Goes to Washington (If He Can Find It)". Get your popcorn ready and enjoy!
May 22, 2008 4:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ha!!
May 22, 2008 4:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
How many people have been thrown under the bus in this election? Do we have a list of names?
May 22, 2008 4:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
For the better part of 18 years I attended fundie churches with my ex-wife and hagees comments are not too out of line with their beliefs. I had many a moment of disbelief when I was told that Catholics were condemned to hell, that the Pope was right up their with the devil and that Mother Teresa would burn in hell, no matter what good works she did.
If you are a robertson, hagee, swaggart fundie then this talk is not that abnormal. hagee was preaching to the choir.
May 22, 2008 4:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
The whole thing is idiotic on McCain's part and on the part of the media.
I'm shocked, frankly, that no Democrat has ever had the presence of mind to point out that this old moron McCain couldn't even say what denomination he belonged to when asked! For years he listed his denomination as Episcopal but just this year when asked directly could not say, fumbled around about it and then indicated he might be Baptist which, if course, is nothing but a lie.
The truth is, he belongs to and attends no church whatsoever and that's fine by me. But as a Republican he cannot be honest about that so he lies with impunity and no one in the press or even in the Democratic Party points out this obvious lie so he gets away with it. Nonetheless, the reality is that for a swine like McCain he must please the moronic right wing masses of his party by claiming some church affiliation so he plucked Baptist out of the air. His hypocrisy and that of the Republicans in general on this, and perhaps most especially for the allegedly religious right Republicans is beyond description. The squad of televangelist hucksters who lead the religious right are no different than the oil industry: they have allied with the Republican Party to protect their profits! No more, no less.
Given this reality, where the fuck does McCain get off questioning anything regarding Obama's church, pastor or anything else? At least Obama GOES to church and he knows which one he goes to and doesn't lie about it! Imagine what would happen to Obama in the press if he told people he belonged to one church one day and then said he belonged to a different denomination the next day? The howling would outlive us all!
One has to wonder if any of the overpaid fools who comprise the McCain cheering section of the US corporate media have even asked him how he can equate going out of one's way to seek the endorsement of a complete and utter buffoon who has made a career and business empire out of picking the pockets of gullible simpleton's in the name of fundamentalist Christianity vs someone like Wright who, even if you don't like his beliefs, has been a well respected leader in a mainline Protestant denomination.
May 22, 2008 4:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Spot the f' on!
Best analysis of the crud.
May 23, 2008 9:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
McCain Pastor: Islam Is a 'Conspiracy of Spiritual Evil'
McCain Called Pastor 'One of the Truly Great Leaders in America'
By BRIAN ROSS, AVNI PATEL and REHAB EL-BURI
May 22, 2008—
http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=4905624
Excerpt:
Despite his call for the U.S. to win the "hearts and minds of the Islamic world," Sen. John McCain recruited the support of an evangelical minister who describes Islam as "anti-Christ" and Mohammed as "the mouthpiece of a conspiracy of spiritual evil."
McCain sought the support of Pastor Rod Parsley of the World Harvest Church of Columbus, Ohio at a critical time in his campaign in February, when former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee was continuing to draw substantial support from the Christian right.
At a campaign appearance in Cincinnati, McCain introduced Parsley as "one of the truly great leaders in America, a moral compass, a spiritual guide."
Campaign aides positioned Parsley right behind McCain for photographers, apparently unconcerned about Parsley's well-established denunciations of the Islamic faith in a book "Silent No More" and on DVDs of sermons about Islam.
"Islam is an anti-Christ religion that intends through violence to conquer the world," Parsley says on the DVDs reviewed by ABC News.
"America was founded with the intention of seeing this false religion destroyed," Parsley says, "and I believe Sept. 11, 2001 was a generational call to arms that we can no longer ignore."
Parsley's views and his connection to the McCain campaign are now beginning to show up on Arab Web sites and newspapers.
Al Moheet, a regional Arabic Web site operating in Egypt, carries the story with a picture of McCain and the headline: "McCain's Spiritual Adviser Calls for the Destruction of Islam."
May 22, 2008 4:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
And what does this say about McCain's JUDGEMENT???????
May 22, 2008 4:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
gotNOlife,
What do mean Clinton has got no religious kook? Did not Bill Clinton invite Reverand Wright to the White House as his spiritual blow-job counsuelor? Is HRC not relying on the GOP Math God Rove(r)?
ARE YOU SAYING THAT HRC IS GODLESS?
HRC, who was prayed for by THE FAMILY, has no religious kooks in her past?
HRC clearly worships power . . . One does NEED crackpots is one is one of them.
May 22, 2008 4:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
McLame's strategy of contrasting Hagee-gate with the "wrong of Wright" is interesting. I'm not sure his advisers are earning their money on this one. The media went ape shit over Wright while giving McLame a free ride, comparatively, on Hagee. In my mind, contrasting them only serves to bring the Hagee issue and the evangofundamentic pandering of the right into focus. Thoughts....
May 22, 2008 5:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think he felt compelled to jump on the Wright issue because he feels it slipping away as a potent campaign issue. Ironically, by inserting it here, he actually puts Wright and Hagee together in people's minds and reinforces the notion that they could be seen politically as cancelling each other out.
This truly was a poorly thought-out response. I don't think McCain "gets it."
May 22, 2008 11:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Anyone else feel like John McCain's turning into Mitt Romney?
May 22, 2008 5:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
A dumbed-down version.
Which is creeeeeeeeeepy scary!
May 22, 2008 11:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey HuffPost: Save this stuff for October.
May 22, 2008 5:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Will the media now ignore McCain's rejection of Hagee and continue playing Hagee clips ad infinitum...just as they did with Obama? I'm thinking "no".
May 22, 2008 5:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Billy Graham was Clinton adviser and she seek her help during the Lewinsky scandal. The same Graham who was Nixon adviser!
May 22, 2008 5:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
I did not have sexual Relations with that man, Mr. Hagee.
May 22, 2008 5:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Personally, I think tagging McCain with the moniker "Rufus T. Firefly" would be a good idea. With apologies to Groucho, of course.
Peace,
Paul
May 22, 2008 5:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
If only Wright would have "withdrawn" himself like Hagee did...
well, I guess he did, in a way (by attacking Obama as a "politician")
Now, will McCain reject his "spiritual advisor" Rob Parsley?
May 22, 2008 5:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm NOT buying it! Neither is John McCain, either!!
May 22, 2008 5:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
McBush excels at being experienced and manly as he compares himself to Obama...this shows what skills he has in judgement by seeking and accepting a presidential endorsement while he has no idea what this dude believes or preaches! I guess his lobbyist team failed him again!
May 22, 2008 6:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, Mr. McCain?
One down, one to go.
May 22, 2008 7:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain does here what only idiots without a real base of defense do: they attack the other guy without any basis or context for doing so. For example, if the debate is "Is chicken good?" you don't say "no because beef is better". That doesn't make sense.
Bringing up Rev. Wright when the issue has NOTHING to do with Obama, and when no one ever mentioned a thing concerning Obama is an extremely childish debate tactic. To be honest. I hope McCain keeps it up. If this is a sign of how he's going to fight it out with Obama in November, things might be a lot easier than some people think.
May 22, 2008 8:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
He did this with Ayers a few days back, too. Everytime he looks silly bringing up Wright or Ayers, Wright and Ayers as issues become more and more associated in people's minds with silliness.
May 22, 2008 11:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
I thought wrapping up his party's nomination was supposed to give McSame a huge advantage, namely in getting all his ducks in a row while the democrats continue fighting each other?
He's had to fire 5 lobbyists and finally disavows Hagee and that was just this past WEEK!
Entertainment, thy name is McCain.
May 22, 2008 8:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain rejected Hagee's antiCatholism and his pro-Hitler statements. But McCain apparently still stands firmly behind Hagee's statement that Katrina was retribution for New Orleans' embrace of homosexuals. And no one in the mainstream media seems to feel the need to question the McCain campaign about that.
May 22, 2008 9:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, what took desperate Puppet Daddy McCain so long? And how can we trust his judgement.
Hagee's problems have been long documented. McCain obviously doesn't watch Bill Moyers, for example.
America's jews will have to ask themselves why McCain associated with a hate mongering anti-semite whose vile words have been around for the last ten years. McCain knew Hagee was trouble and paid no attention to those telling him how Hagee wants the Soviet Union to fight Israel and restore christianity to the country. Hagee believes in the End Game. McCain sought him out, embraced, kept, defended Hagee. Got mad when people wondered why McCain didn't see what everyone else did. And now, McCain just wants people to stay stupid and ignore what he did on this matter.
How must it feel to know they were going to embrace McCain, a man who sided up to an anti-semite. How must Florida's jews feel now. Does McCain have a jewish problem too? Again, McCain begged for Hagee to being his evangelicals and the CUFIdiots of which Lieberman is a part. Like he thought marrying Cindy would get him in with the Arizona mob.
Next up, Florida, will be McCain supporter, Reverend Rod Parsley.
May 22, 2008 11:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
The whole thing reeks, stinks. Depressing. Why do I have a feeling McCain will have zero negative of this charade while Obama will be willified all the way through?
Politics and religon- two disgusting institutions when combined.
May 22, 2008 11:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Senator McCain history has only begun to be vetted by the Democratic Party. The complete Republican Party and their stalworth supporters will be found to be a mixed coalition of creepy political,social and religious extremist.
It appears McCain may not publically hold their public view such as those expounded by the likes of Rev. Hagee, yet he has called Rev. Parsley his "spirtual advisor". Rev. Parsley and Rev. Hagee and their views are much more extreme than that of 10 Jeremiah Wrights, because they are long time supporters of a foreign apartheid government: Israel. Yes, the same Israel that has recently been tied to nuclear spying on the U.S.A. and the one in the same we're celebrating their 60th. anniversity of blood or the innocent with "sweets and flowers".
The Hagee praise of Hilter and the forced expulsion and genocide of the Jews of Europe, was not a mistake or misstep of theological reasoning, but an intentional "Christian Liberationist Platform".
A plateform of "Domination" over the world and the use of christian militarism to achieve that world domination. This means the destruction of all opposition over time and the complete rule over the world under a Christian national banner.
I can not image a world where another Hitler is unleashed, but this time one that is American in origin and with the distinction that it has the capability to destroy the world 100 times over with a nuclear arnesal unrivaled with acception of a few nations.
Research both Hagee and Parsely's church and dominational histories and you will find some very fightening paralles to the Nazi Era and then think real hard about McCain's war for 100-years statements. Opps...I mean: Misstatements!?
May 23, 2008 6:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
The important point here is that McCain now finds himself imitating Obama. This marks him as playing catch-up ball, a very hopeful sign.
Behind it all is the blogospheric insistence on parity of judgment with respect to the candidates, largely absent from the traditional media. It is remarkable that this force has carried the day.
May 23, 2008 7:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
Anyone want to make the real contrast - flip the script, perhaps?
Does it say more about your character to try to stick by and then ultimately have to shun your misguided spiritual consult/family friend of 20 yrs. -- or -- to 'apologize unreservedly'(ala Wanda Fish / Python) - for those whom were formerly known as,'agents of intolerance' -- that you've picked up as convenient political capital along the way? Hmmm?
Wright faux contro = neutralized - blatant BS meter activate.
I love it!!!
May 23, 2008 9:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
According to McCain, "I've never been to Pastor Hagee's church or Pastor Parsley's church," adding: "I received their endorsement, which doesn't mean I endorse their views."
And yet McCain in Cincinnati called Parsley "one of the truly great leaders in America, a moral compass, a spiritual guide".
The flip-flop express just keeps careening off the road...
May 23, 2008 10:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
Of course, I can understand why it was politically expedient for McCain to reject Hagee’s endorsement. Especially, in light of how McCain’s detractors have relentlessly dug for anything they can find to counter the Rev. Jeremiah Wright stigma that McCain’s opponent, Senator Barack Obama, carries. But doesn’t Hagee deserve better? McCain actually sought out Hagee’s endorsement. And this past February, Hagee stood up for McCain, in the way McCain wanted. I trust that Hagee did this, fully aware that McCain has his flaws. McCain admits to this, himself. A good example came this past MLK Day; when McCain appeared at the site of MLK’s assassination and stated, “I was wrong. I was wrong.” And “We all make mistakes. We all make mistakes”, regarding his original opposition to establishing MLK Day, as a National Holiday. Perhaps McCain’s original opposition to MLK Day was out of some well-intended but misdirected over-exuberance. Whatever the reason, McCain, himself, now rejects that position and yet, he asks that we not allow this admitted error to cause us to reject him or his presidential candidacy. Why, then, isn’t Senator McCain extending the same consideration to Pastor Hagee that he asks for himself? Perhaps Pastor Hagee wouldn’t admit to being in error. I don’t know. What I do know is that it troubles me that McCain rejected Hagee without any apparent attempt to give him that opportunity, so he might continue to stand up for him. It makes me wonder how the “Captain of the Straight-Talk Express” will stand up for me, in spite of my flaws.
http://afewdayswithfiggins.blogspot.com/2008/05/mccains-defense-of-hagee.html
May 25, 2008 10:39 AM | Reply | Permalink