In North Carolina Victory Speech, Obama Congratulates Hillary For Indiana Win
Obama's victory speech in North Carolina, which just concluded, opened with a couple of little jabs at Hillary's prediction that North Carolina would be a "game changer" and at her claim to having won all the "big states."
He also offered congratulations to Hillary for winning in Indiana, though that's looking a good deal less assured than it did a couple hours ago...
You know, some were saying that North Carolina would be a game-changer in this election. But today, what North Carolina decided is that the only game that needs changing is the one in Washington, DC.I want to start by congratulating Senator Clinton on her victory in the state of Indiana. And I want to thank the people of North Carolina for giving us a victory in a big state, a swing state, and a state where we will compete to win if I am the Democratic nominee for President of the United States.
Full text of Obama's prepared remarks after the jump.
You know, some were saying that North Carolina would be a game-changer in this election. But today, what North Carolina decided is that the only game that needs changing is the one in Washington, DC.
I want to start by congratulating Senator Clinton on her victory in the state of Indiana. And I want to thank the people of North Carolina for giving us a victory in a big state, a swing state, and a state where we will compete to win if I am the Democratic nominee for President of the United States.
When this campaign began, Washington didn't give us much of a chance. But because you came out in the bitter cold, and knocked on doors, and enlisted your friends and neighbors in this cause; because you stood up to the cynics, and the doubters, and the nay-sayers when we were up and when we were down; because you still believe that this is our moment, and our time, for change - tonight we stand less than two hundred delegates away from securing the Democratic nomination for President of the United States.
More importantly, because of you, we have seen that it's possible to overcome the politics of division and distraction; that it's possible to overcome the same old negative attacks that are always about scoring points and never about solving our problems. We've seen that the American people aren't looking for more spin or more gimmicks, but honest answers about the challenges we face. That's what you've accomplished in this campaign, and that's how we'll change this country together.
This has been one of the longest, most closely fought contests in history. And that's partly because we have such a formidable opponent in Senator Hillary Clinton. Tonight, many of the pundits have suggested that this party is inalterably divided - that Senator Clinton's supporters will not support me, and that my supporters will not support her.
Well I'm here tonight to tell you that I don't believe it. Yes, there have been bruised feelings on both sides. Yes, each side desperately wants their candidate to win. But ultimately, this race is not about Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama or John McCain. This election is about you - the American people - and whether we will have a president and a party that can lead us toward a brighter future.
This primary season may not be over, but when it is, we will have to remember who we are as Democrats - that we are the party of Jefferson and Jackson; of Roosevelt and Kennedy; and that we are at our best when we lead with principle; when we lead with conviction; when we summon an entire nation around a common purpose - a higher purpose. This fall, we intend to march forward as one Democratic Party, united by a common vision for this country. Because we all agree that at this defining moment in history - a moment when we're facing two wars, an economy in turmoil, a planet in peril - we can't afford to give John McCain the chance to serve out George Bush's third term. We need change in America.
The woman I met in Indiana who just lost her job, and her pension, and her insurance when the plant where she worked at her entire life closed down - she can't afford four more years of tax breaks for corporations like the one that shipped her job overseas. She needs us to give tax breaks to companies that create good jobs here in America. She can't afford four more years of tax breaks for CEOs like the one who walked away from her company with a multi-million dollar bonus. She needs middle-class tax relief that will help her pay the skyrocketing price of groceries, and gas, and college tuition. That's why I'm running for President.
The college student I met in Iowa who works the night shift after a full day of class and still can't pay the medical bills for a sister who's ill - she can't afford four more years of a health care plan that only takes care of the healthy and the wealthy; that allows insurance companies to discriminate and deny coverage to those Americans who need it most. She needs us to stand up to those insurance companies and pass a plan that lowers every family's premiums and gives every uninsured American the same kind of coverage that Members of Congress give themselves. That's why I'm running for President.
The mother in Wisconsin who gave me a bracelet inscribed with the name of the son she lost in Iraq; the families who pray for their loved ones to come home; the heroes on their third and fourth and fifth tour of duty - they can't afford four more years of a war that should've never been authorized and never been waged. They can't afford four more years of our veterans returning to broken-down barracks and substandard care. They need us to end a war that isn't making us safer. They need us to treat them with the care and respect they deserve. That's why I'm running for President.
The man I met in Pennsylvania who lost his job but can't even afford the gas to drive around and look for a new one - he can't afford four more years of an energy policy written by the oil companies and for the oil companies; a policy that's not only keeping gas at record prices, but funding both sides of the war on terror and destroying our planet in the process. He doesn't need four more years of Washington policies that sound good, but don't solve the problem. He needs us to take a permanent holiday from our oil addiction by making the automakers raise their fuel standards, corporations pay for their pollution, and oil companies invest their record profits in a clean energy future. That's the change we need. And that's why I'm running for President.
The people I've met in small towns and big cities across this country understand that government can't solve all our problems - and we don't expect it to. We believe in hard work. We believe in personal responsibility and self-reliance.
But we also believe that we have a larger responsibility to one another as Americans - that America is a place - that America is the place - where you can make it if you try. That no matter how much money you start with or where you come from or who your parents are, opportunity is yours if you're willing to reach for it and work for it. It's the idea that while there are few guarantees in life, you should be able to count on a job that pays the bills; health care for when you need it; a pension for when you retire; an education for your children that will allow them to fulfill their God-given potential. That's the America we believe in. That's the America I know.
This is the country that gave my grandfather a chance to go to college on the GI Bill when he came home from World War II; a country that gave him and my grandmother the chance to buy their first home with a loan from the government.
This is the country that made it possible for my mother - a single parent who had to go on food stamps at one point - to send my sister and me to the best schools in the country on scholarships.
This is the country that allowed my father-in-law - a city worker at a South Side water filtration plant - to provide for his wife and two children on a single salary. This is a man who was diagnosed at age thirty with multiple sclerosis - who relied on a walker to get himself to work. And yet, every day he went, and he labored, and he sent my wife and her brother to one of the best colleges in the nation. It was a job that didn't just give him a paycheck, but a sense of dignity and self-worth. It was an America that didn't just reward wealth, but the work and the workers who created it.
Somewhere along the way, between all the bickering and the influence-peddling and the game-playing of the last few decades, Washington and Wall Street have lost touch with these values. And while I honor John McCain's service to his country, his ideas for America are out of touch with these values. His plans for the future are nothing more than the failed policies of the past. And his plan to win in November appears to come from the very same playbook that his side has used time after time in election after election.
Yes, we know what's coming. We've seen it already. The same names and labels they always pin on everyone who doesn't agree with all their ideas. The same efforts to distract us from the issues that affect our lives by pouncing on every gaffe and association and fake controversy in the hope that the media will play along. The attempts to play on our fears and exploit our differences to turn us against each other for pure political gain - to slice and dice this country into Red States and Blue States; blue-collar and white-collar; white and black, and brown.
This is what they will do - no matter which one of us is the nominee. The question, then, is not what kind of campaign they'll run, it's what kind of campaign we will run. It's what we will do to make this year different. I didn't get into race thinking that I could avoid this kind of politics, but I am running for President because this is the time to end it.
We will end it this time not because I'm perfect - I think by now this campaign has reminded all of us of that. We will end it not by duplicating the same tactics and the same strategies as the other side, because that will just lead us down the same path of polarization and gridlock.
We will end it by telling the truth - forcefully, repeatedly, confidently - and by trusting that the American people will embrace the need for change.
Because that's how we've always changed this country - not from the top-down, but from the bottom-up; when you - the American people - decide that the stakes are too high and the challenges are too great.
The other side can label and name-call all they want, but I trust the American people to recognize that it's not surrender to end the war in Iraq so that we can rebuild our military and go after al Qaeda's leaders. I trust the American people to understand that it's not weakness, but wisdom to talk not just to our friends, but our enemies - like Roosevelt did, and Kennedy did, and Truman did.
I trust the American people to realize that while we don't need big government, we do need a government that stands up for families who are being tricked out of their homes by Wall Street predators; a government that stands up for the middle-class by giving them a tax break; a government that ensures that no American will ever lose their life savings just because their child gets sick. Security and opportunity; compassion and prosperity aren't liberal values or conservative values - they're American values.
Most of all, I trust the American people's desire to no longer be defined by our differences. Because no matter where I've been in this country - whether it was the corn fields of Iowa or the textile mills of the Carolinas; the streets of San Antonio or the foothills of Georgia - I've found that while we may have different stories, we hold common hopes. We may not look the same or come from the same place, but we want to move in the same direction - towards a better future for our children and our grandchildren.
That's why I'm in this race. I love this country too much to see it divided and distracted at this moment in history. I believe in our ability to perfect this union because it's the only reason I'm standing here today. And I know the promise of America because I have lived it.
It is the light of opportunity that led my father across an ocean.
It is the founding ideals that the flag draped over my grandfather's coffin stands for - it is life, and liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
It's the simple truth I learned all those years ago when I worked in the shadows of a shuttered steel mill on the South Side of Chicago - that in this country, justice can be won against the greatest of odds; hope can find its way back to the darkest of corners; and when we are told that we cannot bring about the change that we seek, we answer with one voice - yes we can.
So don't ever forget that this election is not about me, or any candidate. Don't ever forget that this campaign is about you - about your hopes, about your dreams, about your struggles, about securing your portion of the American Dream.
Don't ever forget that we have a choice in this country - that we can choose not to be divided; that we can choose not to be afraid; that we can still choose this moment to finally come together and solve the problems we've talked about all those other years in all those other elections.
This time can be different than all the rest. This time we can face down those who say our road is too long; that our climb is too steep; that we can no longer achieve the change that we seek. This is our time to answer the call that so many generations of Americans have answered before - by insisting that by hard work, and by sacrifice, the American Dream will endure. Thank you, and may God Bless the United States of America.








Comments (71)
Class act.
May 6, 2008 9:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
A very gracious, heartfelt speech. Am I the only one surprised he went first tonight?
May 6, 2008 9:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary's going to concede
May 6, 2008 10:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Class act, indeed.
It will be interesting to see if Hillary takes the bait and declares herself the winner in Indiana, only to lose it by a small margin with all those outstanding Obama-supporting areas still to report.
May 6, 2008 9:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hopefully he spoke too soon about Indiana.
May 6, 2008 9:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hear, Hear.
For once, I hope BO is wrong :).
May 6, 2008 9:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
KO said the BO camp thinks they will lose IN by 15k votes
May 6, 2008 9:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jeez - that's nothing.
May 6, 2008 9:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Her "apparent" victory.
May 6, 2008 9:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
the celestial choir is still sing:
it's OVER, it's OVER now it's OVER, it's OUR turn now it's OVER, Hill's game is shut down.
O, sweet justice if Hillary tries to claim victory tonight here in her Indy rally, and ends up losing. Haha :D
May 6, 2008 9:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Russert is pushing back on the joint ticket. Hurts him in purple states. Thank God.
May 6, 2008 9:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Fuck a joint ticket.
I don't want no steenking triumvirate!
May 6, 2008 9:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Precisely. I want the Clintons off of Obama.
May 6, 2008 9:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
I too will join the French class.
Fuck the Joint ticket and Fuck the entire Clinton era.
Enough is enough.
May 6, 2008 10:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
I can tell you that in Colorado, Hillary's name is more likely to be mentioned in jokes than in possible national tickets.
May 6, 2008 10:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Absolutely. She will bring him down.
Or at least, she will bring me down.
May 6, 2008 10:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
He's about 40K votes behind her in Indiana, so that concession just may have been a wee bit premature.
Excellent night for Obama.
May 6, 2008 9:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
We Democrats are a little skittish about candidates conceding too soon.
But when he did it for another Democrat, it just makes him look magnanimous.
May 6, 2008 9:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is it folks. After tonights speech, the next speech we will hear from HRC will be that she is suspending her campaign. Its over.
May 6, 2008 9:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Call GOTALIFE.
May 6, 2008 9:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
He's disappeared like a cockroach when the lights go on.
Oh...sorry about that.
May 6, 2008 10:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gas tax hurt her. Terrible terrible decision by her campaign. I'm sort of horrified that no one who works for her made clear that it was a loser.
May 6, 2008 9:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Technically, this means that I won Indiana, regardless of whether he gets more votes there.
May 6, 2008 9:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Awesome.
May 6, 2008 9:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well said.
I had this feeling all along - I'm glad it was right.
May 6, 2008 9:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
If it's not the real Hillary, it's so damn close!
May 6, 2008 9:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hmm, the pundits on MSNBC seem to be focusing on Obama's NC speech being too "sweeping" and general; isn't that appropriate in a victory speech? Who spells out policy details in that kind of setting??
May 6, 2008 9:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
OK, I know I'm not the first to say this, but I think this may just do it. Why would a donor give her anything at this point?
May 6, 2008 9:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Pity?
May 6, 2008 10:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
The news programs keep talking about "hearing from Purdue and IU" but the semester ended last Friday. All those students that would have voted for Obama (and believe me, that's who the overwhelming majority are supporting) went home and didn't get a chance to vote on campus. If the this had been finals week, Obama would have won.
May 6, 2008 9:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's more than just undergrads voting, though. College towns are usually more of O's demographic, regardless of whether people have matriculated in Calculus 101. For example, if you're a conservative Dem, chances are you'll find somewhere in VA other than Charlottesville to call home.
May 6, 2008 10:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
when do early votes get calculated, though? the UNC students in Chapel Hill voted early (this was finals week, but most of them voted early b/c Obama put huge focus on that here). not sure whether those tallies come in early or late, or come in as separate precinct. Anyone know?
May 6, 2008 10:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
They already came in. That is why he was up on top by 30+ percent early in he evening.
May 6, 2008 10:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm just waiting for HRCs campaign to suggest everyone wear nametags. That way, people are friendlier to each other.
May 6, 2008 9:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey Greg: Why did you changed the order of blog posts?
Anyone else notice that the order of posts was just changed?
May 6, 2008 10:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dude - trust me - Greg had nothing to do woth it. This system just simply sucks.
May 6, 2008 10:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
LOL
May 6, 2008 10:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
As I watch Hillary lurch toward her fate, the vision that keeps coming to my mind is a final scene from an original Star Trek episode where a woman breaks down on her assistant's arm crying "But I wanted to be the captain". It was a tacky and sexist episode (one of Shatner's hammiest performances ever), but that last scene was just made for Hillary.
May 6, 2008 10:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
does someone have a video link?
May 6, 2008 10:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Try C-span 2 -- it's a live stream. They have a call in now but the soundless video is of HRC's rally so I'm guessing they'll show her speech and have video of O's.
May 6, 2008 10:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why won't Obama let blacks on the stage behind him? I don't get that.
May 6, 2008 10:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Anybody just see the tortured logic of the new rules from Looney G. of the Clinton Camp? Relentless...
May 6, 2008 10:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Great speech. He's classy. He's always classy.
Damn, I'm excited
May 6, 2008 10:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Amazing speech. I think we can turn America back from the edge of the abyss.
May 6, 2008 10:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Great speech, even greater victory. Still and all, I am yet hoping for an IN win. I have a prophet's mantle at stake here, for pity's sake. ;-)
May 6, 2008 10:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
same here. I was right about NC, but it doesn't mean as much, prophetically, since I live here. ;-)
May 6, 2008 10:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't remember ever hearing Clinton congratulate Obama for any of his victories. Has it ever happened? I can't wait to hear a concession speech from her. It will be historic.
May 6, 2008 10:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Did the MSNBC pundits hear a different Hillary concession speech from the one I heard?? They all referred to it as "charming" and conciliatory, yet again, she failed to either congratulate Obama on his victory or even thank the 40+% of voters in NC who supported her, began the speech by taunting Obama, and then continued by saying she's going all the way, that it's about time voters in WV, Kentucky, etc. had their voices counted, and demanding to count the votes in FL & MI. How is any of that charming or conciliatory??
May 7, 2008 8:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
C-Span: "what appears to be her victory..."
May 6, 2008 10:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am a Clinton supporter and congratulate Obama on his North Carolina victory (and also, if allowed, would congratulate Hillary on her apparent Indiana victory). I am really bothered by the fact that time after time, Obama wins 90% of the African-American, Black vote, while each candidate in state after state, win or lose, splits the non-biased vote 52-48 or something like that. I call the vote non-biased, although by definition, every vote is based on one bias or another, be it health care, mortgage relief, whatever or wherever the voter and the candidate are aligned on a particular issue.Bias is what one might call our ideas about the issues. Prejudice, however, is a different word. I respect Obama very much but in the national election against John McCain, the 90% black vote - and it's going to come up as a talking point that he's the black candidate - not the choice of working class whites - isn't going to carry Mississippi, or Wyoming - states whose Democratic primaries he won - or perhaps not even Massachusetts or Ohio as recent polls suggest. There's nothing to be done about it, but I believe he will not defeat McCain unless he has a humdinger of a running mate.
May 6, 2008 10:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, please. Kerry got 90% and Gore got 88% of the AA vote. Dems, real dems, always do that well.
Did you know that against McCain, Clinton only get 55%?
Did you know that at the start of the campaign, Clinton had 60 - 65% of the AA vote and that Obama wasn't black enough?
Get a grip.
She did this to herself.
May 6, 2008 10:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
There's nothing to be done about it, but I believe he will not defeat McCain unless he has a humdinger of a running mate.
I'm more optimistic than you. Demographics will be a problem. If the black vote decided general elections, Republicans would never get elected. Obama can't lose the non-black vote in November and win.
On the plus side, McCain is horrible and he certainly isn't going to get any help from Bush.
May 6, 2008 10:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nonbiased 52-48% vote-i.e. white? Non-biased in PA and OH?? Give me a break-I lived in PA, and heard the comments. How about the old women's vote going 2-1 for Hillary?
He'll win Massachusetts and gives the Dems the best shot in New Mexico, Nevada, Oregon, Wisconsin, Iowa, Missouri, and most important, perhaps-Colorado. Once Ohio and Pennsylvania start hearing about McCain's policies, or lack thereof, they'll overcome their fears and prejudices.
I just heard HRC say that she'll work for the Dem nominee-let's hope more reality seeps into her circle soon, so we can get together to prevent a 3rd Bush term with McCain...
May 6, 2008 10:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Unrelated, but it has sprung to mind. Harry Reid looked more inept than usual on last night's Daily Show. Wind blowing for a shift in the Majority Leadders Office? My dream world.....
Obama/Rendell(settle the wounds and great on the stump)
Clinton runs the Senate (where she is best)
Pelosi runs the House (No need to piss of California)
May 6, 2008 10:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Anybody notice that SurveyUSA got it wrong? They had Obama by 5 in NC (looks like 14-15) and Clinton by 12 in Indiana (looks almost like a tie.)
By contrast, zogby had Obama by 14 in NC (right on the mark) and Obama by 2 in Indiana (which looks closer than any other prognosticator.)
So much for SurveyUSA being the best pollster and Zogby being worthless.
May 6, 2008 10:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
I made that same point myself on another thread. Sen Clinton said that this election would be a game changer. We all thought that she meant in the race between her and Obama, but evidently she meant it would be a game changer in the race between Zogby and SUSA. Nothing has changed in her own race - she is still too far behind to catch up and Obama is still on top. Meanwhile, Zogby has bested SUSA in the last three contests now.
May 6, 2008 10:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
That was true in PA, too. And TX. Some of us noticed both of those, and might have mentioned it once or twice when Zogby was getting trashed. ;-) Some of us are rabid anti-Zogbites. It all works out in the wash, I guess.
Quinnipac has had strong overall record for the primary cycle, I think - they didn't really weigh in on IN/NC, though.
SUSA has been off since March. Doesn't mean Zogby's on a roll or nuthin, but he's been way more right than wrong the last couple of months. And SUSA's streak has been a run of misses, not hits, lately. Time to tweak their methodology now.
May 7, 2008 4:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Just got my kids home from Grandma's and into bed, after pulling a 14.5 hour day as a poll observer in West Raleigh (Obama won 708-274 in my precinct). I promised y'all a big win in the Wolfpack state (love the front page picture of Obama making the wolf sign), and I am glad to say not only Yes We Can, but also Yes We Did!
What a great night.
May 6, 2008 10:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for doing that, and thanks to North Carolina!
May 6, 2008 10:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just got back from the Obama team victory party at a local microbrewery after my 14.5 hour day as a poll observer. He won the precinct I was covering 408-18. I got the results in to the campaign before 8:00, but but I'm pretty sure the networks had already called it for him before I completed the call.
I'm glad that my somewhat dire 4-7% victory predictions here in the Tar Heel State were wrong and NC State Dem's were right.
Lots of memorable experiences, but too tired to relate them. Maybe I'll blog them later. Bed now.
May 6, 2008 10:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ooops, that was 409 to 18. My bad.
May 6, 2008 10:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, I had to sit in the Dean Dome for 4 hours last Monday. Obama really owed me the wolf sign for that! :)
When I picked up my rally tix near Pullen Park, the student volunteer promised me that NC State was "quite rabid" for Obama. When a Democrat gets the NC State people in a statewide election, they never lose! That helped me never be nervous about the polls.
I was also elated to get a call just before 4:00 that Obama won a key undecided voter (to me) - my mother. She filled out the Presidential line last, and prayed in the booth for divine guidance. Her conscience told her that she absolutely had to vote Obama. Chipped away at the lead in the 50+ white lady vote!
May 6, 2008 11:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yay, your mom!!
My mom was keeping track of the Robocalls today: Barack, Michelle, Hillary, Bill. We've had them all week, but got ALL of them today. Plus campaign workers from each. She totally flipped out the "live" Clinton campaign worker, though, when the woman asked if she was going to vote for Hillary.
My mom's response, in her best sweet-as-pie Southern Belle: "Well, of course not! Don't be silly."
The campaign worker's reply: "Oh. Okay. Um. Thanks for calling." Then she quickly hung up. That had my mom in stitches as she relayed the story to us over dinner.
It was a good day to be a Tar Heel.
May 7, 2008 4:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
So, have you guys noticed that there seems to be an unusual concentration of North Carolinians in the commentosphere here?
May 7, 2008 10:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Apparently, we have an overabundance of eggheads in our state. Perhaps that contributes to our proclivity toward commenting?
There does seem to be a higher level of political savvy / interest in NC versus other places I've lived, though. Lots more "high information voters," comparatively. I don't know if it comes from some combo of the overall demographics, the tradition of activism borne of largish Quaker and reformist Catholic populations (in my region, at least), the numerous colleges, or what. Maybe it's just in the water - or lack of it. Anyway, I like it.
I do find it kinda funny, though, that NC was more or less the birthplace of the current delegate / super delegate system (via the Hunt Commission). Sorry about that, y'all. That was before my time as a resident here - as was Jesse Helms, mostly. Hopefully we atoned some for both those errors last night.
May 7, 2008 9:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Breaking: Zogby International to change name to Who's Your Daddy? Pollsters.
May 6, 2008 10:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
I thought a good sign for Obama comes out of IN, regardless of W or L, he won St, Joseph county, home of Notre Dame and a pretty good Catholic population. This is the surprise of the day. I hope Lake County starts coming in. Early reports we of high voter turnout, good sign for the future nominee.
May 6, 2008 10:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Awesome.
May 6, 2008 11:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Early voting had been going on for almost two weeks. The students got their votes in. (I saw big lines of students at the Purdue polling stations.)
May 6, 2008 11:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
That should have been attached above... (stupid system!)
May 6, 2008 11:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
There are some interesting numbers out of Indiana. Check this website http://www.wthr.com/
in IN. At the top of the page is election results. Look at the number of votes for Democratic President, then look at the votes for the Democratic Governor's race. Quite a difference. This is a comment on the IndyStar website http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080506/NEWS0502/80506049/1324:
DocIndy wrote:
Interesting to note the numbers listed of actual votes counted at the WTHR website. As of 11:25 PM it shows that almost 100,000 more votes for the Democratic presidential primary versus the Democratic Governor primary. (Roughly 1.1 million votes fopr the president versus 1 million for the governor.) I wonder how many people just voted for one of the Democratic presidential candidtates and did not vote for any one else?
5/6/2008 11:30:35 PM
I looked at the numbers. Is this Limbaugh's Operation Chaos? Huffington has a link to Limbaugh bragging about his success.
Also there is this on IndyStar...
The Indiana Secretary of State's office reported high voter turnout, spokeswoman Bethany Derringer said. More than 173,500 people voted absentee, according to the agency's Web site.
Since it is so close, could the absentee vote change the result? I don't know if the total numbers include the absentee votes, however.
Result from WTHR:
Precincts Reporting: 4778 of 5230
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Candidate Total
Hillary Clinton D 588,106 51%
Barack Obama D 567,149 49%
Last Updated at: 5/7/2008 12:01:46 AM
Just wondering.
Someone could be really upset!
May 7, 2008 12:08 AM | Reply | Permalink