Hillary's Letter To Super-Delegates: I'm The One
Signaling a renewed push to super-dels in advance of Saturday's meeting on Florida and Michigan, Hillary has sent a letter and memo today directly to the super-dels that once again presses her electability case and appeals to them for support.
In the letter, Hillary continues to try to argue that the Dem primary electorate has not rendered a clear verdict on their choice of nominee, the cornerstone of her strategy to get super-dels to focus on electability:
In addition, when the primaries are finished, I expect to lead in the popular vote and in delegates earned through primaries. Ultimately, the point of our primary process is to pick our strongest nominee - the one who would be the best President and Commander in Chief, who has the greatest support from members of our party, and who is most likely to win in November. So I hope you will consider not just the strength of the coalition backing me, but also that more people will have cast their votes for me.
Her memo includes maps and polling to make her electability case -- including, as Ben Smith notes, Karl Rove's electoral maps.
Available in our Document Collection are the letter, the memo, and a collection state-by-state general election polling.















So sad.
May 28, 2008 12:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
It really is. She's ready for her close-up, Mr. DeMille.
May 28, 2008 12:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think we've left Sadtown and are now entering Pathetic City.
May 28, 2008 12:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
You crack me up!
Thanks for the laugh.
The attention given to the Clinton soap opera is making me uneasy. I needed the laugh.
May 28, 2008 1:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
I likes that a lot.
My, I go off to appointments and errands and come back by god, she's still at it.
Trying to deep six my caucus vote, no less.
I wouldn't recommend trying that, Democrats. You will have one huge angry state on your hands.
May 28, 2008 3:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
I definitely deserve a meal of crow.
Yesterday, I was arguing with commenters who kept saying, in essence, "It's all Hillary and McCain, all the time".
They were right. I was wrong. Do we have any news of the Obama campaign this morning?
May 28, 2008 12:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
He did get 3 SDs. But, ya know, whatever.
May 28, 2008 12:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just a side effect of running an effective, drama-free campaign, I suppose. I mean, the closest thing to a scandal Obama's had all month was yesterday's Auschwitz/Buchenwald slip-up.
May 28, 2008 12:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, there is Obama news. Just not here.
They didn't cover his speech yesterday where he had that great line about McCain going to Bush "hat in hand." That was a killer and it's a shame they didn't mention it.
May 28, 2008 12:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Which had the effect of giving his great uncle's history even more attention.
May 28, 2008 12:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
yes, the right wing blogs are questioning if Barack's great uncle actually served and, if he did, was he anywhere near Buchenwald.
May 28, 2008 1:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here we go again, another Kerry swiftboat. Never mind McCain only was in combat 20 hours, crashed four planes, was the third lowest in his class at the Academy, and his former Commander just wrote that in his opinion McCain is in no way fit to be President. But whatever.
May 28, 2008 1:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
You got a link for that last one?
May 28, 2008 1:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, link, please?
May 28, 2008 1:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
It was on Huffington Post last week sometime. I don't have the link, but I will try to find it.
May 28, 2008 1:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
No link here, but chck out Robert TImberg's book, The Nightingale's Song about his time at and after USNA. If his full military record is revealed, there will be no doubt about his inability to lead a squadron much less a nation.
USNA '96
May 28, 2008 1:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah and the only ones who think that's a big deal are loony tunes.
Jeez.
May 28, 2008 3:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Welcome to the dark side, CT. You are among friends, now.
May 28, 2008 1:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
"I'm the one." So funny.
It's really becoming more and more like the girlfriend who just won't go away.
Don't you know she can never love you like I can? You and me - we belong together. We're soulmates.
Something tells me this whole thing might have to end with a restraining order.
May 28, 2008 12:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Re: "I'm the one"
She apparently thinks she's Neo.
May 28, 2008 1:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Or else that Springsteen endorsed her instead of Obama.
May 28, 2008 3:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Absolutely hilarious. And probably correct.
May 28, 2008 2:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is!
She reminds me very much of a woman I went to law school with who was so hell bent to get married that she stalked a couple of guys - the last one she stalked, she really got carried away! She kept going to his house in the middle of night to catch with someone else, she did things to his car, she went nuts!
And this really does feel a lot the same.
May 28, 2008 3:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
She's the psycho ex-girlfriend of the Democratic Party. A step away from being a stalker.
May 29, 2008 4:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Every time I read her saying "more people will have cast their votes for me" my head wants to explode. I hope the supers have the same sensation.
Ignoring caucus voters is sheer insanity. I cannot wait til June 3 and the supers come out of hibernation to end this.
May 28, 2008 12:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Most votes if you ignore caucuses! Most votes since March 4!
The more she pulls shit like that the more pleasure I get in seeing her lose. I'm not proud of it, but it's all I can do not to go insane. She wants to be President soooo badly and now I just giggle knowing it'll never happen.
May 28, 2008 12:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nope.
The two metrics that include all the states have Clinton ahead in both.
Obama is only ahead when he disenfranchises some states. Regardless of the DNCs decision on seating those delegates, the popular vote is a documented fact.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html
May 28, 2008 1:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nope.
May 28, 2008 1:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why are you lying again?
May 28, 2008 2:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Clinton's ONLY HOPE at getting a popular vote majority is by including Puerto Rico, which is not a state and gets no electoral votes in November.
If you count the States, Obama has a clear popular majority.
May 28, 2008 2:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
And, once again, by any measure, her "lead" is still less than the 280,000 odd people who voted for "uncommitted" in Michigan.
May 28, 2008 3:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Excuse me - how does a candidate disenfranchise anyone?
Got an answer?
I bet you don't. Know why? Cause that is not possible.
The only entity that can officially disenfranchise anyone is a governmental entity and a man running for office is not a governmental entity.
and there's no right to vote in a primary anyway, which you have been told about 80,000 times.
May 28, 2008 3:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
In addition, when the primaries are finished, I expect to continue to undermine Sen. Obama. In fact, the popular vote and the delegates earned through primaries mean nothing. Ultimately, this is all about me. I am destined to be the President and Commander in Chief. So I know you will consider not just the strength of the Clinton brand, but remember, we never know what
might happen in June.
May 28, 2008 12:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Signed,
HRC, Narcissist
May 28, 2008 1:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Narcissist in Chief,
Minister of Ego,
President for Life,
Secretary of State,
Attorney General,
Senate Majority Leader,
Best and Brightest and Most Wonderful,
(and Your Best Friend),
HRC
May 28, 2008 1:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm sure the supers appreciate getting materials compiled by Karl Rove mailed to them.
May 28, 2008 12:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
I expect to lead in the popular vote
(because I'm not counting caucus states or Michigan voters who would have voted for Obama)
and in delegates earned through primaries.
(because caucusses don't count)
Ultimately, the point of our primary process is to pick our strongest nominee
(pick me-pick me-pick me)
the one who would be the best President and Commander in Chief,
(that would be me or John McCain)
who has the greatest support from members of our party
(not counting faux-Dems like African-Americans, under-40s or white-men)
and who is most likely to win in November.
(even though I couldn't win in my own party)
So I hope you will consider not just the strength of the coalition backing me
(they can break your legs)
but also that more people will have cast their votes for me
(not counting the majority who voted for Obama)
May 28, 2008 12:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
yeah, but Obama's majority does not matter because they don't belong to Hillary. Only voters voting for a Clinton matter.
May 28, 2008 1:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm guessing she's sending this letter via the bloggers because all remaining Supers have blocked her phone calls and refused to sign for any certified letters for the Clinton campaign.
These attempts are actaully pretty sad when Obama keeps rolling out Supers everyday, while the only one she can muster is a guy who was originally hers, flipped to Obama, now has flipped back to her.
May 28, 2008 12:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
maybe TPM could do it's job as a reporting website and juxtapose her polling-based claims with the NUMEROUS accounts or her or Wolfson or McAuliffe saying "we don't believe in polls" or "we don't make our case based on polls".
that would give her claims a sense of perspective.
May 28, 2008 12:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
That WOULD be nice, wouldn't it blackstar. Guess that would be too difficult for Sargent and Kleefeld to do...
May 28, 2008 1:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
If she's so adamant that she would be the best president, maybe she should have run a better campaign.
May 28, 2008 12:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, well, on the bright side -- isn't it sheer joy watching the White House fall all over themselves casting Scott McLellan as the classic Disgruntled Employee?
They did the same thing when Matthew Dowd was courageous enough to break with them publicly on Iraq -- started hinting he was psychologically over the edge. What a bunch of Grade A Assholes.
May 28, 2008 12:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, this could be a break-through and may change their minds about gun-control since those disgruntled workers sometimes take the matter into their own hands with a gun.
(wry grin)
May 28, 2008 2:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
I love this so much.
I never did think as poorly of Scotty as I did of Ari and I really despise Tony Snow, deeply (I am sorry for his cancer - I wouldn't wish that on anyone).
Scott always seemed uncomfortable lying - at least, to me. Ari lies like melted butter and Tony Snow is hopeless - he's such an idealogue that who knows what happens in his brain.
But I really believed at the time and now he's said so - he left because they lied to him about Plame and he very emphatically repeated that lie to the press and when it was revealed to be a lie, he was embarrassed.
May 28, 2008 3:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why are we indulging her with coverage? This is like giving a kid lots of attention for having a temper tantrum. Hillary is stamping her feet and threatening to hold her breath at this point.
May 28, 2008 12:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Breaking:
After receiving Karl Rove maps from Hillary Clinton, several Democratic Super Delegates are now being rushed to treatment centers to rid them of Turdblossom Cooties.
May 28, 2008 12:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama has won more votes, has more delegates. So how does she claim she has more people voted for her?
Why should the SD's not take into account the very pertinent fact that a complete nobody overtook her name recognition and campaigned her to a stand still. How does this make her the strongest contender?
McCain has only now started to challenged by his Dem opposition. Instead of all these months of throwing the kitchen sink at Barack, Hillary should have been throwing it at McCain. Instead she said she and he are the same. How does this make her a stronger contender?
What does she think - the SD's will just command Obama to resign, go away, quietly, and give the nomination to Clinton because she asked for it?
Astonishing.
May 28, 2008 12:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Because her letter states "earned through primaries" (i.e. ignoring all caucuses) and including her votes in the Florida and Michigan primaries and giving Obama zero votes in that Michigan.
May 28, 2008 2:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am sure that Greg & Eric will go batshit crazy and will be posting only the Clinton Talking Points from here onwards and all the way up to the convention.
Obama getting supers everyday ? Who cares ?
May 28, 2008 12:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm pretty sure those Democratic superdelegates JUST love maps from Karl Rove.
May 28, 2008 12:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Apparently Greg and Eric do...
May 28, 2008 1:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Really pathetic. She has no shame.
May 28, 2008 12:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
From the desk of:
Terrible McAwful
Senator Clinton is putting together a TV ad, in response to Senator Obama's ad now showing in Puerto Rico.
We are asking for help from some of you who are fluent in Spanish. Please email or call us with the Spanish for;
Obliterate, Assassination, Sexist, Shame on you Barrack Obama, Slavery, Zimbabwe, Bitter, Cling, Rev. Wright, Gas Tax Holiday, Fighter, Snipers, White Americans, Sweetie, Hard Working Appalachian Puerto Ricans, and Woop-De-Doo.
May 28, 2008 12:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
You forgot his middlename -- Blowhard
May 28, 2008 1:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good one liam!
May 28, 2008 1:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
This video is from way back in January. But it works so very well right now. For fans of the movie "Election."
May 28, 2008 12:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
yes! and as I've said before...Hillary is Tracy Flick, but without the charm.
May 28, 2008 1:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
I would argue the point of the primary process is for the voters' wishes to be upheld. But for the sake of argument, let's accept her premise.
So let's see who really would be the strongest nominee:
Is it Hillary who has launched an unprecedented 50-state voter registration drive?
Is it Hillary who is conducted an unprecedented organizing institute to train and deploy the largest field operation of any Democratic nominee?
Is it Hillary who attracted an unprecedented 1.5 million-plus donors?
Is it Hillary who is turning out young voters in unprecedented droves?
Is it Hillary who has stayed on the high road and avoided saying or doing anything to undercut the party's chances in November?
Is it Hillary who has the higher favorable-unfavorable ratio in polling?
I don't think so...
May 28, 2008 1:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm gobsmacked that Hillary Clinton and her campaign honestly believe Karl Rove has the best intentions of the Democratic Party in mind with his 'electoral maps'.
Geez Louise. This is just getting embarrassing.
May 28, 2008 1:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Karl Rove is an unbaised journaist now, and has nothing but the best interests of America in his heart....
Wow. This is really getting sad.
May 28, 2008 2:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, Hillary not just you. Vote Democrat in 2008!
May 28, 2008 1:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary just wants a do-over; that's all!
The Clintons absolutely KILL ME. Last night one of their surrogates was saying that the Dem party can't survive if people keep vilifying the Clintons. How can they not look at their own behavior in creating this dynamic?
May 28, 2008 1:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
it's not just you they're killing.
May 28, 2008 1:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, remember back when Bill was running and Jerry Brown was still in the race?--my goodness, they tried their best to vilify him. And, then, even though he came in second, they shut him out of a prime time speech at the convention.
they are shameless
May 28, 2008 1:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's not the people who are villifying the Clintons. It's the Clintons who are villifying the Clintons.
I have to remind myself every once in a while that she was our First Lady. I just can't believe the depths that she's sunk to in this primary. And Bill...I used to have genuine respect for him.
These two are suffering from overexposure. They need to take a very long vacation and count on America's short memory to come back and try to rebuild their reputations and focus only on doing good works from here ever after.
May 28, 2008 1:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why is tpm flooding this site with these ridiculous stories today----withou ever offering a very simple caveat?
Hillary cannot run against John McCain without destroying the black part of the party, the youth part of the party, and the best educated part of the party. (Yes, these three parts of the party overlap in many cases).
To actually nominate Hillary, as opposed to inserting her into a poll of people who are not paying enough attention to realize what such a bizarre thing that would be to do at this point, is not something which can happen.
May 28, 2008 1:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
A much simpler caveat: Hillary has lost.
May 28, 2008 1:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Karl Rove's electoral map? She's nuts. She keeps talking about death bed conversions, but no one is converting to her; she's converting to them. Death bed conversion, indeed.
May 28, 2008 1:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
who not Karl Rove's map? She's used all his other strategies.
May 28, 2008 1:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Breaking:
From the desk of:
Terrible McAwful
Senator Hillary Turdblossom Clinton plans to petition the Electoral College to cancel the November election, and declare her to be the next President. She has persuasive poll evidence that should convince them that John McCain has no chance of winning, so why even hold the election. A clear example is: He will have no chance to win the support, in November, of even a single Puerto Rican voter.
May 28, 2008 1:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is this Clinton Week at TPM?
May 28, 2008 1:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Every week is Clinton week at TPM as it turns out.
May 28, 2008 1:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
For some time now, I've been thinking "Projection!" when I hear Bill or Hillary kick into attack mode on the Obama campaign. Accusations of racism, sexism, divisiveness, unelectibility, inexperience, etc. etc., I swear it's all been said with the two of them looking in a mirror.
With this new argument, that Obama's victory is illegitimate, they've reached to the point of no return. Who's illegitimate, again? The good news is that it's becoming pretty obvious now: the mirror is cracking--the spell is breaking.
May 28, 2008 1:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
O/T: those are some big ears on that cat!
May 28, 2008 1:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
I love it when you Avatars talk to each other.
May 28, 2008 1:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
So, superdelegates should support the one who has "the greatest support from members of our party, and who is most likely to win in November"? Is Clinton endorsing Obama?
http://thinmansblog.blogspot.com/
May 28, 2008 1:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary, save the BS for your supporters who are still believing you, because the superdelegates actually pay attention, and you are just embarrassing yourself in front of them. Lying to voters is one thing, but superdelegates don't appreciate you blatantly lie to them.
May 28, 2008 1:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
For a Democrat who only leads McCain in California by 3 points to claim they are the better candidate is insanity.
If she were the best candidate then she would have won the most pledged delegates.
May 28, 2008 1:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
What is Clinton eating for lunch?
How many pricate e-mails has she sent out today?
Did Hillary sleep well last night?
Has Hillary thought about what she'll do after she loses the election?
Do you guys still think she'll contact you guys as much after she loses?
I wonder what Hillary is dreaming about right now?
Does Hillary like lattes at all, or is it all alcohol all the time?
Please please please keep posting about Hillary. please.
May 28, 2008 1:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
That would be the biggest fairy-tale I've ever heard of. Looks as though the voters have stolen her coronation.
May 28, 2008 1:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
What I find most interesting is not the tortured logic employed by the Clinton's in making the "popular vote" argument, I have long since recognized that they will say anything in pursuit of victory, but rather that so many of her supporters are still willing to go along for the ride.
Imagine the mental gymnastics necessary to believe that the votes should be counted from an election where:
1) the voters were told the results would not count;
2) the candidates were not allowed to campaign; and,
3) only one candidate's name appeared on the ballot.
Such an election would make Stalin blush, and yet millions of HRC supporters are not only willing to accept it, they are willing to fight for it. Truly amazing!
To any HRC dead-enders reading this, how do you do it with a straight face?
May 28, 2008 1:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow! Do you notice something missing here, like oh... caucuses?
May 28, 2008 1:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
sorry, I can't seem to get my quote blocks right!
May 28, 2008 1:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
I like what jon stewart had to say last night about the vast left wing conspiracy and the vast right wing conspiracy double winging bill and hillary. It is amusing that bill is saying its the democratic voters fault that hillary lost. oh and the media took her down too. oh the irony in a non democratic process of nominee selection hillary lost, what with the machine, the money and the previous power all working for her and she lost.
May 28, 2008 1:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
that was one of the Jon's best shows evah last night. It never lagged - right through Matt Taibbi, whom I adore.
May 28, 2008 3:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Took long enough. This has been all over the internet for hours. Was your fax or e-mail down or something?
By the way, any news on the election or campaigns this morning, other than the clintons' fantasy world? Just wondering. There are other candidates and a general election campaign in full swing. The clintons are so 90's. Let's move on.
May 28, 2008 1:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's been a few months since I've asked this question. Does TPM publish every word that comes from the Clinton campaign? Is there any editing considerations?
Is it as balanced for Obama?
May 28, 2008 1:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
1) Pretty much
2) doesn't seem to be
3) no
From the archives of simply answers to simple questions.
May 28, 2008 2:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks, Les. Appreciate the straight talk.
You must be from the midwest.
May 28, 2008 2:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
:)
May 28, 2008 3:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary who?
May 28, 2008 2:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, she is.
May 28, 2008 2:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
CT's cat: Nothing gets past the Mighty Quinn, cat extraordinaire...
May 28, 2008 2:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Super-Delegates to Hillary: No you're not
May 28, 2008 2:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary's most compelling argument:
"If you don't pick me, I will hold my breath until I pass out."
May 28, 2008 2:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Weird mental image of Hillary and Obama a la Olivia Newton John and Travolta at the end of Grease singing, "You're the one that I want..."
May 28, 2008 2:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, thank you so much. That's stuck in my head for the rest of the day.
May 28, 2008 3:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're welcome!!!!
doot doot doo...honey...
May 28, 2008 3:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Ultimately, the point of our primary process is to pick our strongest nominee - the one who would be the best President and Commander in Chief, who has the greatest support from members of our party, and who is most likely to win in November."
The strongest nominee...wouldn't that be Obama?
May 28, 2008 3:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
It really gets me that she's going forward with this idea that the caucuses don't count.
O really, Hillary? What happened to "every vote will be counted"?
May 28, 2008 3:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's actually, "Every vote will be counted*"
* offer not valid in IA, CO, ID, KS, MN, NM, ND, NE, WA, ME, HI, WY, and American Samoa
May 28, 2008 3:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary is not NEO . . .
Hell, Clinton isn't even Retro . . .
May 28, 2008 3:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Although she may well be Smith.
May 28, 2008 3:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
That would mean that she's part of the matrix and therefore, a member of the powers that be.
So maybe she is Smith.
May 28, 2008 3:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh my god. More time down the rabbit hole.
It's really very simple, Hillary.
Any candidate that can go into a primary season with a 20-point advantage, a massive political and fundraising machine and the more name recognition than any candidate and manage to blow it all simply is NOT a strong candidate for any office.
If you were the strongest candidate, you would have won. You had every single advantage, and you squandered it all.
Who is a strong candidate?
A strong candidate is one who starts out behind and manages to build up win after win and an uncatchable lead in delegates and amasses a great warchest for the general election AND manages to do it without fighting down and dirty against his fellow Democrats.
That's the strongest candidate by far.
May 28, 2008 3:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well some one who is running a campaign in the red is not the strongest candidate than one who has a big war chest still.
That's just plain old easy to understand America - The party is not going to nominate someone who cannot raise money in any way that equals her opponent.
This is America.
May 28, 2008 3:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ach! I tried to make a comparison with a superlative and that was so stupid.
She's not the stronger candidate than her opponent.
May 28, 2008 3:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
PLEASE... MAKE... HER...STOP!!!!
May 28, 2008 3:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
The essential point is this, and it has been thus since the Wisconsin primary: any poll or argument that says that Hillary is a better candidate against John McCain does not factor in that for Hillary to get the nomination, over the head of the winner of the majority of pledged delegates, would alienate African-Americans, young voters and millions of Obama post-high school voters, many of whom would likely sit out the general election if, IF, Hillary were to convince enough Supers to award her the nomination. The polls do not factor this massive defection in, nor do any of the arguments Hillary has advanced, all of which are based on polls that do not factor in how a huge proportion of Obama supporters and voters would react to such a coup.
May 28, 2008 7:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
"I expect to lead in the popular vote and in delegates earned through primaries."
You have to give it to Hillary, that is some good humor. Best laugh I had this week.
May 28, 2008 7:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Re: "I expect to lead in the popular vote and in delegates earned through primaries."
Does this mean, "count every vote, except the caucuses"? Sounds like it.
May 28, 2008 8:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
I TOLD YOU SO!!
May 28, 2008 8:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is it possible that Hillary trying to divide the party to the extent that McSame wins, thereby giving her another shot in 2012? Is she that power mad? PJ Hussein White
May 29, 2008 12:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
100% out of touch 100% of the time.
She is consistent.
May 29, 2008 1:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
"I'm the One!"
Great slogan.
Quiz time: whose slogan in the presidential race years ago was: "______'s the One!"
Tell you anything?
Peace,
Paul
May 29, 2008 4:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm picking up on the scent of a bunny boiling...
May 29, 2008 9:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
pstamler:
Quiz response: He wasn't a crook.
May 29, 2008 9:03 AM | Reply | Permalink