« Dems Capture Long-Held GOP House Seat In Louisiana | Home | Hillary: Stephanopoulos And I Were In Anti-NAFTA Camp »

Hillary: It's Me And Ordinary Folks Against "Elite" On Gas Tax Holiday

Hillary Clinton has just started doing an Indiana town-hall meeting being broadcast on ABC, and George Stephanopoulos asked her a direct question:

Could she name a single economist who agrees with her support for the gas tax holiday?

Hillary sidestepped the question, and tried to use the complete dearth of expert support for the idea to her advantage, pointing to it as proof that she's on the side of ordinary folks against "elite opinion" -- a phrase she used twice.

"I think we've been for the last seven years seeing a tremendous amount of government power and elite opinion behind policies that haven't worked well for hard working Americans," she said.

A bit later she added: "It's really odd to me that arguing to give relief to a vast majority of Americans creates this incredible pushback...Elite opinion is always on the side of doing things that don't benefit" the vast majority of the American people.

An ordinary voter begged to differ, however. Stephanopoulos turned the mike over to a woman who said she supported Obama and said she makes less than $25,000 a year.

"I do feel pandered to when you talk about suspending the gas tax," the woman said, adding: "Call me crazy but I actually listen to economists because I think they know what they've studied."

We'll be bringing you more from Hillary's town hall right here -- and at 10 AM, Obama is being interviewed by Tim Russert on Meet the Press. Stay tuned.


Comments (159)

Talk about dead horses!

Hillary - Congress already turned you down.

The whole stupid idea is dead.


boy she really does count on voters being dumb, doesn't she?

avatar

"Elite opinion is always on the side of doing things that don't benefit..."

Hillary just called Paul Krugman an elitist!

avatar

More than that -- Hilary just called roughly half of the country "elitists". A CBS News / NYT poll found that 49% of respondents think the gas tax is a bad idea. (Compared to 45% who think it's a good idea.)

Why does Obama Fever make people soooooo dumb??? I would much rather the oil companies paid more tax and average people pay less tax! Why is that so hard to understand? That is what she is saying. SHIFT THE TAX BURDEN FROM THE POOR CONSUMER WHO IS STRUGGLING TO THE RICH CORPORATION THAT IS SWIMMING IN CASH !!! GET IT??

There's very, very little chance that tax would even happen, guy. Buy the Clinton line all you want. It's a load of horseshit.

I suggest you read this:

http://www.newsweek.com/id/135323

And at the end of the day, regardless of who pays the tax, this stupid plan increases American dependence of foreign oil. Hello?

There you have it: The Obama crowd DOESN'T want working people to have a penny of relief when it comes to gas prices. Why? Because they might drive more, and Obama's elitist text-messaging crowd wants to solve the energy crisis on the backs of working Americans.

You limousine liberals make me sick. It doesn't matter to you how much gasoline costs - you'll still have your chauffeur drive you everywhere you want at about 10 miles a gallon. But if working people want to take a summer vacation with their family - that you can't allow. When Obama loses in November, you'll know why.

I don't know why you're acting like an elite yourself, sitting here typing comments, when you should be picking me up in the limo right about now. You're already 5 minutes late. I swear if you don't get to my house soon to take me to the champagne tasting event, I'll fire you and hire someone who doesn't fancy literacy like you do, someone who will work for less. Get your ass moving, Mr. Smarty Pants!

avatar

If you'd ever taken a class in economics, you'd know that the tax burden from the increase will just be shifted back to the consumers. If you tax the consumer, they pay it. If you tax the corporation, they increase prices and the consumer still pays it.

avatar

Almost. Here's how the economic theory goes:

If the government subsidizes consumers, demand rises, and some of the subsidy given to consumers is passed onto the producers as producers raise their price. If the government subsidizes producers, supply rises, and some of the subsidy given to producers is passed onto consumers as the producers lower their prices. It doesn't matter who the government subsidizes -- the producers or the consumers -- the economic incidence remains the same. Whichever has the greater price sensitivity (elasticity) -- the producer or the consumer -- gains the most from a subsidy.

The case is similar with taxes. If the government taxes consumers, demand falls, and some of the tax borne on consumers is passed onto the producers as producers decrease their prices. If the government taxes producers, supply falls, and some of the tax borne on producers is passed onto consumers as the producers raise their prices. It doesn't matter who the government taxes -- the producers or the consumers -- the economic incidence remains the same. Whichever has the greater price sensitivity (elasticity) -- the producer or the consumer -- bears the greatest burden from the tax.

avatar

Wait, Just the basic common sense argument. It is May 4. Has Senator Clinton being back to the Congress with her plan? Is her plan even on paper? If so, does anyone actually think it would happen before Memorial Day, May 25. That is in 21 days. The Speaker of the House and many members of Congress are against her.

I pray and hope IN and NC are smarter than that. Remember how long it took them to get us our rebate checks, months. And that is with the vote being approved at all level and even Bush saying OK.

This will not happen in 21 days and not even this summer.

avatar

To her, political reality *IS* reality.

Senator Clinton has a great love and appreciation for *ALL* the polls, and wants to make sure that each one of them are told whatever they need to be told in order to be happy.

avatar

And please tell me why she shouldn't count on voters, taken in the aggregate, being dumb? Have we already forgotten 2004?

For the most part, American voters are dumb

Yes!

Hillary sidestepped the question, and moved cast the complete dearth of expert support for the idea to her as an advantage, pointing to it as more proof that she's on the side of ordinary folks against "elite opinion" -- a phrase she used twice.

What a load of BS ? LOL.

(i>"I do feel pandered to when you talk about suspending the gas tax," the woman said, adding: Call me crazy but I actually listen to economists because I think they know what they've studied."

Ding. You Go, "Girl".

This is fun.

LOL!!!

Another stupid American!


LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"I do feel pandered to when you talk about suspending the gas tax," the woman said, adding: Call me crazy but I actually listen to economists because I think they know what they've studied."

One word: takedown.

Also: hasn't the Bush administration caused a whole hell of a lot of trouble precisely because they DIDN'T listen to experts? Like, real experts?

It seems everyone at that Town Hall meeting was taken for a trip to the No Fact Zone.

Frankly, I'm pretty surprised they have Obama supporters there asking questions. Team Clinton probably won't be too happy about that. But it sounds from Ben Smith like she's treating Steph like a rag doll, so I'm sure that will go over well with all of her non-elitist supporters.

Do you know how horrific it is to have a Dem bash another Dem (the likely nominee) playing the "elitist" card? Which, of course, is code for "educated." Because God knows the last thing this country needs is a bunch of people aspiring to higher education.

I adore Hillary. Simply adore her.


It's unbelievable.

She's trotted out every single moss-covered long standing cliched smear on the Democratic Party ever used. Every one.

She is unbelievable. Yeah, I just adore her too. She's quite something.

avatar

Clinton has shown in this campaign that she is a fighter and will stand up for the things she cares about. However, as a senator she has been a total marshmallow, voting for the war and a flag burning amendment and triangulating her way to Republican lite. Isn't it clear to everyone by now that deep down the only thing she cares about is herself?

avatar

She never voted for the Flag Desecration Amendment. She has supported bills that ban flag burning when the event is used to incite violence, but she never, never has favored the Constitutional Amendment.

I voted for Barack Obama, but I feel we need to be truthful.

She's in the tank for McCain. There's really no doubt about it.

I agree.
She's become almost Romney-esque in her clownish adorability.

"'I think we've been for the last seven years seeing a tremendous amount of government power and elite opinion behind policies that haven't worked well for hard working Americans,' she said."

Actually, I think the problem is that for the past 7 years this administration has been too willing to IGNORE expert opinion - in the areas of foreign policy, global warming, etc. This administration's well-documented war on science is one of the most disturbing aspects of the last 7 years.

Exactly.


She even double talks like a Republican. In fact she's got that down pat.

It really bugs me.

I totally agree. Too clever, by half.

Georgie Boy, elitist ??? WTF ???

avatar

Heh. So even the rubes have figured out that the $50 "tax break" Hillary's promising won't do them any good?

Meanwhile, I wonder how many superdelegates she's turning off every day she continues to hammer on this "gas tax holiday" thing. People who, if she does what she's said she will do, will be forced to vote against it and will then see their Republican opponents use the vote in attack ads this fall.

Real smart.

It's a shame. With the sorry lot that they had, Hillary could have easily won the Republican nomination if only she had changed parties last year!

Fookin comment of the day!!!!

She's already told us how many times now? that if we just ran our primary like the fascists do, she'd already be the nominee.

avatar

.....does this woman even count? I mean she lives in INDIANA fer chrissakes. Not New York, not California, not even Ohio but INDY FREAKING ANA. Why is she even allowed to address Hillary? Was Hillary part of the elite in 2002 when she gave Bush permission to invade Iraq? Did she help deregulate the telecoms in 1996, which really really has benefitted the greater public at large (as our news industry has devolved into a rotted carcass). She has that as experience that we can count?

avatar

Is expert opinion suddenly mean so little, will she now delete all the "experts" she touts to boost her healthcare plan? Doubt it...

HRC = Bush 44. Opinion - like votes - only counts when it's on your side.

Some elitist experts are more equal than others is the idea that transpires from the Cliton camp.

They sound more and more orwellian. They've been stuffing BS in a bubble that's bursting at the seams. There are signs it is overflowing.

avatar

You'd think that some of those experts she cited for approving of her healthcare plan back then would be a wee bit upset that Hillary is calling them elitists today!

Paul Krugman, for one...

Yep, she'd continue in the fine tradition of Dubya--ignore the people who have the knowledge and the answers, and the more people try to straighten you out, the more you dig your heels in.

Sometimes I'm surprised that Hillary's head doesn't just explode. Keeping so many lies up in the air has to take a tremendous effort!

What she said there is really rich. GW Bush's style of governing has been "we don't need to listen to experts because we know better". Sounds like Hillary would govern the exact same way.

avatar

I think Hillary has now dragged out every last canard Republicans love to use. Anti-intellectualism!!? Those over-educated economists who don't care about everyday folks?

McCain won't have to pay for ads against Obama he will just show clips of Hillary calling him elite, effeminate, and on the side of the educated. Nothing like rushing to the bottom and appealing to the lowest denominator. Don't remind them that you strove mightily to get into elite East Coast Ivy League schools. Go ahead and encourage folks to distain education.

No wonder people are drawn to Obama's message of "lifting folks up."

avatar

More Republican talking points against Democrats from Hillary! She is making the rope that will be her noose.

Didn't you know ? Controlling "noose" cycle is a big thingy with the Clinton camp.

Last time I checked, cutting infrastructure and jobs in order to achieve a short term political gain is not a working class ethic... no self-respecting working class man or woman would blow their rent check on drinks for their buddies.

God bless the woman who called a spade a spade. It is a pander, a short term tax cut that puts people out of work. I shudder to think about my wife filling her tank, saving 50 cents, while a highway worker gets a pink slip. The concepts just don't reconcile with my moral decency... but then again, I'm an elitist.

Where I live both MTP where Obama was being interviewed and TW are telecast at the same time. Needless to say, I watched the Obama interview and missed the Clinton Campaign event telecast for free to the whole country.

I did find the quote absolutely tasty:

"I do feel pandered to when you talk about suspending the gas tax," the woman said, adding: Call me crazy but I actually listen to economists because I think they know what they've studied."

Amen! Doesn't Hillary realize she's running for the nomination to the party that has been fighting the republicans on this sort of blatant anti-intellectualism? Are there ANY republican talking points, methods, procedures, etc., that Hillary won't deploy to undermine the clear Democratic frontrunner?

avatar

Onondaga County -- up here in Upstate NY -- canceled its gas tax a few years ago. The price did not go down, the county finances suffreed and it was repealed. Senator Clinton should look to the state she is supposed to represent. But then -- as we have learned -- was NY state anyting more than a stepping stone for the senator.

avatar

Hillary's idea of "Elite" are those who can think for themselves, much like the GOP's talking points. Hillary has said that she will campaign for Obama for president after she loses the nomination, but will she be wanted? Or will she become the dick cheney of the dem party, our own little bull dog?

Amazing! 23 posts and not a single Clinton supporter coming to bat for her. How long can it last?

"I think we've been for the last seven years seeing a tremendous amount of government power and elite opinion behind policies that haven't worked well for hard working Americans."
That's not just pandering, that's know-nothingism.

Dare I ask what Clinton's response to the woman was? Is she another member of the factually based "elite"?

Economist hae great 20/20 hindsight. The great economists and legislators are the ones that allow and cause this mess we're in. Now all of a sudden we want they're expert opinion as validation.

Nuts to that. I say common sense of shifting the burden to the oil companies not only makes sense but, if you oppose it you are rightly labeled an oil company shill.

Clinton is right.

Can you find at least *ONE* expert who agrees with the policy?

That agrees with what? That it will put more money in the pockets of consumers instead of oil companies? Find me an expert that disagrees with that. Everything they says regarding gas prices is based on theory.

Theory is what got us into the current economic mess so if you want to rely on their theories I'd suggest you just come out as a Republican.

Common sense is what will get us out of this mess. Tax the oil companies, not the people.

As in, thinks the gas tax holiday is an effective policy and will actually help consumers in any significant way and isn't merely a transfer of billions of dollars of government revenue to the oil companies. The tax is on the oil companies, here - they have the choice of whether to change their prices or not. You don't think they'd just rather...take the extra money for themselves? Oh, that's right - the oil companies hate money.

And please don't pull this folksy "who needs expert opinions anyway?" bullshit. That's the kind of crap that's been going on for 8 years that we're campaigning against.

avatar

Idiot.

avatar

uh, I was referring to Fogu2. Sorry about the confusion.

Take a memo!

"Theories" are things that only elitist commie-liberals should use! Salt of the Earth(TM) Hillary Clinton "$100 million" knows that we U.S. Americans go off our gut!

No, common sense is what got us into this mess. George W. Bush relies more on his gut and on "common sense" than any president in recent history. And he has been a miserable failure. And Hillary would be a miserable failure too. Just like she was a miserable failure when she tried to push through Hillarycare, and just like she was a miserable failure when she voted to invade Iraq, and just like she's a miserable failure in managing her own campaign.

Common sense and 4 bucks gets you a cup of coffee at Starbucks. What we need is expert opinions, and a president who's willing to listen.

avatar

By "hitting the oil companies" with Hillary's tax holiday, do you mean passing that windfall profit tax to pay for the loss in jobs and money caused by the tax holiday? As in passing a bill now? As in George Bush signing a bill that hits his oil buddies to make up for the lost money and jobs to fix road that would be caused by this tax holiday now?

Sure. Now that's a plan mired in reality.

I knew it was just a matter of time before someone shameless enough to vouch for ignorance would chime in -- we can always depend upon you, fogu2!

avatar

wow, now I'm one of the "Elites" ???

just a matter of time before I'm one of the "Beautiful People" too

talk about being willing to say anything ...

avatar

Of course. "Elite" = "does not agree with HRC." That is certainly a growing population.

So, according to Sen. Clinton, expertise in a given field is now elitist, meaning of no practical value. That's a real good message to send to the children. Maybe it's this attitude that's making the US less competitive internationally. According to this kind of thinking JFK and FDR where both out-of-touch elitists. Intellectualism is supposed to be a good thing. Especially when managing large bureaucracy. This is one of the things I hate most about American politics, the disdain for intelligence.

avatar

Well, at least she did not say the science was bad. She just ignored the science.

I think we've been for the last seven years seeing a tremendous amount of government power and elite opinion behind policies that haven't worked well for hard working Americans

Don't trust anyone over 80 IQ!

avatar

You are confused the "I" means Ignorance and the "Q" means quota; you have gotten the rank ordering wrong as is what is up is not and what is down is not. Got that?

avatar

Uh... no. Maybe I'm too elite to understand WTF you mean with your ignorance quota being over under sideways down comment.

There is no one more "elite" in this country than the Clintons -- they are trying to establish a dynasty. While the Bushes established their's on oil, the Clintons are basing their's on the financial sector.

Cleverly, Hillary blames the prices on the "mean oil companies", but the fact is that these companies now control only about 20% of the world's reserves, while the rest is run by state-owned national companies in China, Russian, Iran, Saudi Arabia, etc. And they are beginning to not even put their oil on the open market -- cutting deals directly with each other.

Ironically much of what is wrong with the dollar now is because of the financial policies of the (Bill) Clinton era. Of course, Glass-Stegall being repealed helped and actually encouraged the credit and mortgage bubbles that are now collapsing.

During the Clinton years, Bill and Hillary got particularly close to the financial sector -- not manufacturing. And, it was during Bill's administration that finance became the #1 sector of the economy, surpassing manufacturing.

There are theories that when finance becomes so central to the economy of a nation, it spells a signal of the great nation's collapse. It happened to Spain, the Netherlands, then Britain, and now... probably us. Kevin Phillip's writes convincingly with more detail about this in his books.

The Democratic Party of today is wealthy precisely because it now occupies the place with Wall Street that the GOP used to. Obama represents the last gasp of popularism -- and he survived because his campaign, alone, truly understood the Internet's unique ability to serve as a communication and fund raising medium.

For people thinking that the Democratic Party is of their great-grandfather's FDR era, think again.

This Party is now beholden to the financial sector. Expect to stand in line behind the pinstripes to get anything. Did anyone see Chelsea Clinton at the elite Kentucky Day Derby gala? What about her job at an elite hedge fund? How about the cozy relationship that the Clintons have with the Chinese? The US is already being put into a 3rd wheel position as the Russians and Chinese are building an Asian coalition, the likes not seen since the 50's (and based on oil production). How close do we want the POTUS to be with the Chinese?

Obama is unique because he is less beholden to the Wall Streeters than Hillary.

It would be extremely bad for the country if Hillary were elected for this reason. The dynasty aspect is also a hint at what happens during a great nation's collapse. In most respects, John McCain is actually better for the long-term well-being country in this sense than Hillary. Obama, of course, is our last chance to truly try something "new".

This is a great comment, and I LOVE the new avatar.

Re: Avatar: thanks! California Paige made it for me... all credit is hers!

Didn't you get the memo? Clear thinking is the new elitism!

Who would thunk that Obamites would side with oil companies. Truly mindboggling.

Next they will support trickle down/supply side economics as long as Obama supports it.

Obama's Lemmings.

avatar

well I guess we had to have at least one Hillary supporter in the thread.

Fogu2, that gas tax holiday will go STRAIGHT into the pockets of the oil companies. I will bet you $1000 that the price of gas will drop at most by a few pennies, not 18 cents, if this foolish idea is enacted. If ExxonMobil can charge $3.50 for a gallon of gas, they are going to charge $3.50 for a gallon of gas whether there is a gas tax or not.

This idea is worse than pandering; it is a giveaway to the oil companies disguised as throwing a few crumbs to the peasants.

avatar

Shove your strawman up your ass.

Clinton's plan is to tie the gas tax holiday to windfall profits tax, which will never pass Congress, or the current President for that matter. Not enough votes to override his veto, and so there you end up.

It's craven pandering. Duh.

So at the end of the day, it diverts much needed infrastructure funds (hello? remember the bridge collapse in Minnesota last year?) mostly into the pockets of gas retailers and not consumers.

Recommend that you get a clue before continuing to embarrass yourself with your know-nothing posts.

avatar

You've been brainwashed. The oil companies love the idea of the federal government lifting taxes on their product. Do you think companies *like* having taxes on their product? Do you think tobacco companies like having the government inflating the price of their stuff?

Seriously, maybe the government can lift taxes on the Kool-aid you've been drinking.

Yep, $100 million Hillary sure is going to fight for ordinary folk against these goldanged elitists.

avatar

Clinton is an embarassment to all of her supporters and the entire Democratic Party. The politics of division is her go-to option as she and her husband squandered their aspirations to presidential power. Pandering to the uninformed and or uneducated with a policy that will do consumers for finanicial harm than good, is the height of political exploitation. In desperation to overcomme Obama's lead, the Clintons have revealed their true color is more red than blue.

Clearthinker is right. The very cheap capital these days foster speculation. We're now going from one bubble collapse to another. That's not how healthy economies function. The Clintons have been apart of this trend. There was a time when investment profit was made from dividends. Now, it's all speculation. Obama is anti-lobbyist, and that's a very good first step. I hope he brings some responsibility to the financial markets.

avatar

When are people going to start talking about the obvious? Why isn't she dropping out. Barring Obama, as they say, "being caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy" Billary is out. So why is she still running? Because she would prefer McCain in office than Obama. Keep things in the hands of the "good ol'boy network" and give her another shot at it in four years. Hillary puts her ambition before you, me, the Democratic Party and the entire country.

avatar

Why is she running? I'll tell you, by running on Bush's 2000 man of the people pseudo populist platform, after playing race, gender, "real democrats" and warmongering card, HRC is carving out the low info white, +50 y/o, 70/30 female/male segment of demographics, bigger and historically more reliable dems than the AA vote in order to try to blackmail her way into the nomination via SD's

The argument goes like this:

"If you select ME we'll lose 5% of votes (AA's, liberals and the young won't vote JMC anyway), but BHO is unelectable (we made it so), 25% of the voters will only vote for me."

Without a path to a pledge delegates lead or a solid electability argument on her own merits that's all she have left.

avatar

Hillary has jumped the Shark.

Her big claim to the nomination is that she has the experience to be ready on day one to get things done in Washington.

Her failure to get her very time urgent Gas Tax bill moved through both houses of congress will destroy her claim of being able to get things done in Washington.

Annie Oakley Clinton just shot herself in the foot.

Hillary should prove right now that she can get that gas tax holiday passed. It would prove whether she really has leadership potential.

Of course her fellow Dems would be mightily pissed that she put them in a bind of doing what is best for the country or pandering for votes. Way to go Clinton.

Seems to me the two candidates aren't too far apart on contributions from the energy sector:

Energy/Nat Resource

Obama, Barack $1,006,110

Clinton, Hillary $959,617

--Open Secrets


Nor in the financial sector:


Finance/Insur/RealEst

Clinton, Hillary $19,257,950

Obama, Barack $16,911,383

--ibid

There just isn't much difference. They're both centrists dems that will pacify the markets and the corporations before they do anything for the public.

I think an excess profits tax is always in order during times of war, and has been the norm historically.

War profiteering is absolutely repugnant, and we've put up with it for far too long.

I have to agree with Hillary on this, it's not JUST the oil companies that should be shamed into low profits at time of war, it should be all corporations making obscene profits from the blood of us "little" people.

I have to agree with Hillary on this, it's not JUST the oil companies that should be shamed into low profits at time of war, it should be all corporations making obscene profits from the blood of us "little" people.

Blaming things on the oil companies is a red herring. They only control 20% of the world's remaining reserves. Negotiations with the nations that have the national oil companies (Russia, china, Iran, Venezuela, etc.) are now tougher as much oil doesn't even get sold on the open market, but rather through a direct deal.

The US oil companies are currently buying back their own stock at a ferocious rate -- mostly to soft land their ventures from the horrible collapse when most oil will circulate among Asia. We are, by all measures, past peak oil and the remaining reserves will be used by the exporting nations first to bolster their own industrialization and then sold outside their countries.

You'll get your wish soon enough, workerbee. The US oil companies won't be getting any profits soon enough. You were concerned about the price of oil this past winter. I daresay that next winter, you will be looking back a year at the good old days.

avatar

I hear leeches work great for...well just about anything.

avatar

This is where Obama really needs to separate himself from the Republican/Clinton style politics.

He said it on meet the Press this morning, but he needs to make the insulting "Gas Tax Holiday" his prime emblem of the politics he wants to overturn. Personally, I think he should equate it with the Boston Tea Party.

He needs to say

Hey Indiana and North Carolina, this Gas Tax Holiday nonsense is a Republican con job. A holiday? John McCain and the Bush administration are trying to make it sound like we ought to have a big party to celebrate the fact that they're going to drop the price of gas from $3.75 a gallon to $3.65 a gallon, and work things around to put even more money in the pockets of big oil. Anybody remember what gas cost when they got into office?

And Senator Clinton is right in there with them--proposing a minor variation on the same thing.

It's the Iraq war vote all over again--a lie to the American people and Senator Clinton supporting the War while splitting hairs over what it meant. It was a vote against the interests of Democrats and ordinary Americans then, and this is a vote against our interests today.

The Republicans and Senator Clinton think we are all actually dumb enough to fall for this--that we'll knock back a couple of shots, slaughter some hawgs and get ready for a hoe-down to celebrate our GAS TAX HOLIDAY!

Well Indiana and North Carolina, I have a different idea. Let's tell the Republicans and Senator Clinton what we think of their politics. Instead of a gas tax holiday, let's turn this into a BOSTON TEA PARTY. Except instead of dumping tea in the harbor, let's dump Senator Clinton and the Republicans! Instead of a dinky gas tax holiday, let's give them a permanent holiday!

What do you say? Let's make this the Indiana Tea Party and dump Senator Clinton and the Republicans! Let's make this the North Carolina Tea Party and dump Senator Clinton and the Republicans! And in November, we'll make this an All-America Tea Party and dump George Bush!

Something like that, anyway. The point is that the "Gas Tax Holiday" is nothing to celebrate. Obama needs to take up the torch here.

avatar

In one of the debates, Hillary Clinton promised to put a windfall profits tax on the oil companies, and to spend that tax on developing alternative clean renewable energy.

Now Hillary is going to spend that same windfall tax revenue to pay for the loss of revenues in the highways and bridges funding.

So, far Hillary has now promised to spend the windfall profits on two different things. That is one hell of trick. Hillary should teach all those struggling working class people how to spend their wages at twice the rate that they get paid. That would solve all their problems.

Breaking:

New book deal for Senator Clinton

Title: HOW I LEARNED TO STOP THINKING AND LOVE FUZZY MATH.

By: HILLARY DOUBLE SPENDER CLINTON.

avatar

Um, so all those economists, who as a group probably have less money than the Clintons do, are ignorant elitists.
And pigs have wings and the moon is made of blue cheese.

Is there any way to get her to shut up and go away?

avatar

Call me crazy, but trying so hard to turn the gas tax issue into a game changer makes the Obama camp look like they are grasping at straws. It was the first big issue changer from the Obama camp after Obama reversed himself and disavowed Wright. When I hear "gas tax pandering" I think of Wright because that's what this issue was attempting to change the subject from.

OMG Scary Black Preacher! Gah! Wright does not affect you or me or anyone, really. He's not going to be a part of the Obama administration. His words will not affect your job, or your pocketbook, or the state of the nation.

The Gas Tax insult from Camp Hillary, however, will affect the entire country and beyond. Name one, just one, economic expert that thinks it's a good idea. Just one.

Isn't HRC grasping at straws by taking an idea from the republican frontruner? It isn't even an original idea. She's also trying to play the "elite" card. This coming from someone who has over $100 million in the bank. All of these political ploys are just politics you can Xerox.

avatar

Otto is a Racist Scumbag, Aryan Nation Troll(ANT)

Compare and contrast:

“I think we’ve been for the last seven years seeing a tremendous amount of government power and elite opinion behind policies that haven’t worked well for hard working Americans” — Hillary Clinton, in full pander mode, defending the “Gas Tax Holiday” on ABC’s “This Week”
“And I don’t like these élitist airline pilots, with their locked doors and ability to fly planes. I think I know how to fly my own children through the air.” — Jon Stewart - The Daily Show
avatar

The price of gas at the pump is primarily due to increased demand by developing countries and a 40% loss in the value of the dollar. You can blame the GOP for the crash of our currency. Bushs War debt is the driving force. Clinton's reference to "elite" ought to be challenged. Let her define "elite." As she has used it so far, it has been directed at people who are educated, knowledgeable and informed. Perhaps these people should be weighing in and influencing public opinion. Obama seems to appeal to the educated and informed. Hillary's base seems to appeal to a disporportionate number of the under informed.

avatar

STFU, Hillary!

avatar

And sadly, CNN keeps the bashing on Senator Obama, saying that he is out of touch because he is against the gas holiday tax break...

This is unbelievable...

I wonder if CNN is giving money to the Clinton campaign...