OK, Greg - one lousy post on Obama's MTP appearance (with a back-handed criticism of what he said about Hillary's saber-rattling) and then we're right back to Hillary stuff. Why does Hillary merit 3 posts of her town-hall meeting statements and Obama merits only 1? He had a lot of other stuff to say during that hour and I think you are doing the good folks here a great disservice in not posting more of his interview this morning. It really is frustrating to have to go to other blogs and news sources for this information. What's the deal?

Thanks for mentioning the typical misleading Hillary bullshit.

She is desperate and her lies show it. Although she still lied even when she thought she was inevitable, so maybe it is less about desperation and more about her nasty character.

Damned, Greg, so are so in the tank for Obama.

It's not too surprising, considering it seems the numbers aren't going her way. She backed off a little last week, I think this has come to be expected. However, one shouldn't trust these polls too much, she may have made an error. We'll see on Tuesday.

She is running for Bush's third term.

Every time I think Hillary can't sink any lower, she manages to do so. Please Indiana and North Carolina, put an end to her misery.

As polls show us, Hillary Clinton is once again willing to LIE to get a VOTE.

She spent her whole hour on This Week PROMISING all sorts of things to voters. She's a snake oil dealer for sure.

It's no wonder voters get the impression that all Democrats want to do is SPEND MONEY.

There she goes again.

And what the fuck with that sniper gun near BO's head ? Is the fucking Clinton camp sending a fucking "message" ?

(Pardon, my Fucking French today)

Yep, sounds like the kind of guy she'd work for "with all her heart" to get elected.

If someone says the government can have his gun when it pries it from his "cold dead fingers," would that be called "clinging?"

And in another mailer, Clinton quotes Obama at the age of five when he said, "I don't want to go to church!"

Clinton's message is fair and on target (pun intended). Obama is a fake, a double-talking deceiver, a bamboozler.

Personally I want all guns outlawed so I oppose both their points-of-view. I think the 2nd amendment has been grossly misinterpreted for politically practical reasons.

This is distressing and disturbing and sad. But also, dishonest.

Is there no one in the press who will seize on this garbage the way they do every burp from the Rev. Wright?

Hillary Clinton has endorsed John McCain for Commander in Chief ahead of her fellow Democrat, Senator Obama. Hillary has also threatened to Obliterate Iran, much like War Monger McCain sang about bombing that nation.

Hillary voted for the War in Iraq, and voted with Kyl/Lieberman to set the stage for Bush to attack Iran.

Hillary is echoing McCain's moronic gas tax holiday pandering.

Hillary is now out gunning Charlton Heston. She is now running around Indiana with her hands stuck in an ice bucket, in order to hold her gun in her COLD DEAD HANDS.

Hillary is McCain. Which right wing pander bear do you prefer?

Take this Republican-hack-wannabe away...NOW.

C'mon Hoosiers, here's your chance to save the Party, save the Nation by driving a stake through her political heart once and for all!

What I hate about the "guns" issue in particular, is that the implication is always left that somehow or other the person targeted is going to "confiscate your weapons". We all know it's not only BS in reality, but there's not a President who even try such a thing and think (s)he could get away with it. Same goes for the crap that we being distributed by the Bushies in 2004 in some southern states implying Kerry would confiscate their Bibles. I know idiots believe that sort of stuff, so its nice see Hillary pandering to the idiots in the electorate and using the typical GOP
approach to try and pull it off.

This from a politician who claimed she opposed NAFTA while first lady.

As for the poster who claimed we'll be getting McCain and not mediocrity with Obama, I sure hope was being sarcastic. If mediocrity is his concern, McCain is the poster boy.

Ridiculoud pandering. A Democrat like Hillary claiming she is a strong supporter of gun rights. That is rich.

Excellent Ad. Hopefully the Oilbama will drop out after Tuesday's defeats. I hope he gets kicked out of the senate soon. He has been chairman of a committee that has held zero hearings since he was appointed, he says he was too busy running for President, which makes one wonder why he accepted the post. He voted for Dick Cheney's Big Oil Energy Bill. He has done nothing to help end the war except to vote for all war funding bills. Total empty suit.

Obama talked down to small town folks with that comment. And notice that he tried to implicate Bill Clinton with George Bush as a cause of their misery. It was a slick of lying. Democrats are indebted to the Clintons for not only taking the WH back but also for racking up impressive economic gains across the board. Working class gained $7,000 per year in income during Bill's term compared to the loss of $1,000/yr under Bush.
How is Obama going to say that democrats have done good for the working class in the fall campaign? He lied and shot down his own party.
Why didn't you point that out from the entire text you printed? bias bias!!

The rifle has a double-set trigger and a left-handed bolt. The pic has been reversed. As a Democrat who's also a shooting enthusiast, (yes, there are some) the picture just jumped out at me as wrong. When I studied it closer, it was obvious that it's been flipped, a mirror image. Furthermore, the rifle is a German Mauser. Fairly expensive. Not a gun I'd expect to see your average deer hunter in Indiana using.

Whoever made the ad knows even less about guns than Hillary.

Why did they reverse the image? I can't imagine they intentionally wanted to convey a violent message towards Obama. Anyhow, someone should ask Ms Annie Oakley if her grand daddy taught her to shoot on a $3000 German import sniper rifle. Hey, maybe she uses one just like it to hunt vermin with her fellow "God bless us rich people" elitist Mittens Romney.

I just hope Indiana voters are savvy enough to realize how desperate Hillary Clinton is. She cannot catch up in delegates, so she's running for 2012, but she needs McCain to win in the general to make her plan work.

That last was to Present.

Indiana and North Carolina Democrats, your help is needed to avert an ugly controversy awaiting us in Puerto Rico. In the U.S. territory, citizens do not vote in presidential general elections, but they are given a voice in the Democratic primary.

Puerto Rico's Democratic party decided, on March 8 of this year, to hold a primary rather than a caucus to allocate it's 55 delegates. This decision was made after it became clear that in a close contest, the total popular vote -- no matter how skewed a figure, due to the mix of primary and caucus states -- would become an important number in discussions about the nomination. States that had already had their caucuses, in full accordance with the rules established before the primary season began, did not have the re-do option.

Colorado and Puerto Rico have been allocated the same number of pledged delegates, 55. With Puerto Rico holding a primary with an expected turnout of at least a million voters, its popular vote will likely equal the total caucus votes of Colorado PLUS the primary votes of South Carolina, New Hampshire, Delaware, and Utah, combined. Puerto Rico will thus have a popular vote equivalent vote strength of 160 pledged delegates, rather than their allocated 55.

If the perception is widespread that Obama won the delegate count but lost the popular vote, it will weaken our Democratic nominee and cause feelings of resentment among Clinton supporters. Our best hope of winning in the fall is with a strong nominee who was fairly chosen because he won the most pledged delegates and the most popular votes. The large popular vote expected for Clinton in Puerto Rico may make Obama fall short in the popular vote.

If you've concluded, as I have, that our likely nominee, Senator Barack Obama, is worthy of your vote in the fall, I urge you to consider voting for him May 6. I think it is a wise move for everyone who hopes for a Democratic victory in the fall.

Even if Obama is not your first choice now, your vote in his column of the popular vote would be a gesture of hope for a Democratic victory in November. Doing so will help unite the Democratic Party and give us our best chance for a win in the general election.

As a California voter in June of 1992, I cast my vote not for Jerry Brown, my governor and favorite candidate, but instead for an inexperienced, charismatic governor of a small state, Bill Clinton. It was clear that he would be the nominee, and I wanted to add my little boost to strengthen him going into the convention and the fall election.

Thank you for your consideration.

you people talk as if its all about HIllary, same tired hate. Get over it, its not healthy. Its about fixing the nation from how GWB is leaving it. Who is the better to fix it?

A first term rookie whose never been tested? Someone who offers the stars and the heavens but no reality solutions? Obama doesn't give a hoot about you and me. He's concerned about Obama. Whats his solution to the gas hike? Never heard it did you? At least Hillary offers SOMETHING, which is better than what even the guy in office today is offering.

Working people understand the difference,elitists don't.

I guess people also have missed the message that while Obama is ahead in the delegate count HE NO WAY has reached the REQUIRED number for the nomination. To state otherwise is dishonest. Those are the facts just the facts! who is pandering now?