« Obama Airing New Ad In Montana | Home | Obama, Clinton And McCain All Say They Are Committed To Darfur »

Dems Way Behind In Financing Convention

Although the Democrats have generally done a lot better at fundraising than the Republicans this cycle, the long primary campaign might be taking a toll on one key aspect of party organization: Funding for the convention that will officially nominate the presidential candidate.

The host committee responsible for financing the Denver convention is seriously short of its goal, and would need to raise $15 million by June 16 in order to remain on schedule. By contrast, the GOP's host committee is on track to meet its goals for financing their convention in St. Paul.


26 Comments

| Leave a comment

Maybe Obama can lend them the $15 Million!

user-pic

No one is going to the Republican convention . . . A diet of pure caviar, bubbly and sheep's balls for every night can be maintained for twenty to thirty dusty old white guys.

Dean is a failure.

that's because no one wants to buy ticket to a show when the headliner hasn't been announced yet. get a nominee, get money. simple.

Once the DNC figures out a way to get this nomination process wrapped up they will find people (like me) more willing to contribute. I am not scratching out a check only to have Hillary try and take her trainwreck all the way to the convention. As soon as Hillary bows out I'll be happy to contribute.

I think the DNC's money problems can be traced to lack of leadership and people being tired of it. Count me in that group. And this issue predates the current primaries fiasco.

user-pic

Wasn't there a similar problem in 2004? I seem to recall that there was some last minute flurry of groveling before some CEOs which saved the day. Personally, I would hope that we could spend less on these affairs anyway.

As someone who normally contributes to the DNC and the DCCC, I can say whole-heartedly screw them. I'll support my local candidates, but why should I give $$$ to organizations that have taken every opportunity to put the thumbs on the scale for Obama? Hit up the Obama supporters for money.

Sour grapes much?

Please tell me specific incidents where the DNC has "put the thumbs on the scale for Obama."

Sure - the DNC's (Howard Dean) lack of leadership in pushing both parties (primarilly Obama's campaign) for a revote in Florida and Michigan instead of allowing Obama's campaign to keep kicking the can down the road until he thought he saw the nomination in sight. Donna Brazille holding herself up on CNN as neutral while serving as the Obama campaign spokeswoman and criticiZing Hillary at every opportunity.

In terms of the DCCC, Nancy Pelosi's faux "neutrality" while always making her comments to benefit Obaam - endorsing Obama's revisionist stance on super dels voting for whomever has the most delegates rather than on their own conscience which is what Superdels were created for.

The failure of the democratic party leadership to speak out vocally against gender based attacks on senator clinton while being so protective of Obama that they will find the most ridiculous statements racially offensive and criticize both bill and hillary - telling bill to stay out of the race.

I don't think ever in a primary has a democratic candidate ever been treated so harshly by members of her own party. It's a pretty evenly split party and if 1/2 the party feels their candidate of choice was treated disrespectfully by the party leaders and the media, yeah people will be bitter with good reason.

You're clearly very bitter, dijamo. Bitter enough to sit out the election? To vote for McCain?

I live in the great state of NY, so I will be writing in for Hillary. NY is going to go Obama if he is the nominee regardless. I will however make sure to vote for my congressman as the dems will need a veto proof majority in congress since nominee Obama = President McCain (in my honest opiniong).

I will also encourage Hillary supporters in red, close blue state or purple swing states to get a post in called not mccain and put it over Obama's name when if that's what they need to pull the lever. 4 more yrs of doubling down in Iraq, Scalia becoming a moderate on the Supreme Court and the US going further into national debt and in hock to foreign countries is what we'd face with Mccain so we need every dem vote we can get. McCain will win anyway but al least Hillary supporters can blame the Obama supporters & Democratic party for nominating an unelectable candidate rather without holding themselves to blame if the election is miraculously close.

"McCain will win anyway but al least Hillary supporters can blame the Obama supporters & Democratic party for nominating an unelectable candidate rather without holding themselves to blame if the election is miraculously close."

Wow. Do you really think Obama's unelectable, even when he's already beating McSame in virtually all national polls -- even before he's really started going after him? And what's this about "blame"? Is that the next stage for Hillary and her supporters once she bows to the inevitable and concedes? I have to ask you: Do you work for Hillary's campaign, either as a volunteer or as a paid staffer? The fervor of your commitment is out of the ordinary.

I travelled to PA to canvass for Hillary and have made phone calls from home and in the phone banks in NY, but I don't consider myself Clinton "staff" or even an official "volunteer". I think the reason I seem out of the ordinary is that many other Hillary supporters and die hard democrats have largely been driven off TPM and other blogs because of the hatred and venom thrown at Hillary and Bill during this campaign.

In terms of Obama's electability, I thought he was more electable than Clinton when they first started and would have preferred Hillary but would gladly have taken Obama. After Reverend Wright and the whole course of this campaign, I lost a tremendous amount of respect for him. I honestly don't think he can withstand the smear attacks destined to head his way. the GOP turned john kerry vietnam war hero into an anti-american, lying, purple heart stealer. Do you really think given the ammunition Barack himself has provided he really has a chance? I honestly do not. I think he'll lose by a much larger margin than Kerry. Just my opinion

"Do you really think given the ammunition Barack himself has provided he really has a chance? I honestly do not. I think he'll lose by a much larger margin than Kerry. Just my opinion"

Yes, I think he has a terrific chance, particularly given his broad appeal in terms of both demographics and the electoral map. I think you're forgetting about Hillary's negatives, which could be exploited at least as effectively as Obama's. For starters, the entire Bill Clinton presidency and its various and sundry controversies -- whether manufactured by the Right or their own creation -- would immediately be fair game, and we'd be treated to replays of Monica, Paula Jones, Whitewater, Travelgate, the Rose Law firm billing records, Vince Foster, allegations of drug smuggling, etc. etc. ad nauseum. Sure, most of it is garbage ginned up by an unhinged and unleashed Ken Starr and by Richard Mellon Scaife and his "Arkansas Project," but I for one think that the public is jaded with the Clintons, wary of having to relive that period, and eager to turn a new page with a fresh face. And: speaking of fresh faces, McSame is anything but. Obama can use his own relative youth to exploit McCain's age and long-standing, inextricable ties with Beltway lobbyists and Big Business, as well as his unwavering support of the most unpopular Bush policies. As for whether Obama might be overwhelmed by the coming Republican smears, as Kerry was, well, I think we've already seen that he's not going to pull his punches and sit silently by. He has already effectively and forcefully counterattacked against some of McCain's strongest broadsides, and I feel sure that he will continue to do so as the campaign unfolds. Kerry sat back and waited for the media to set the record straight for him, and of course they did not. I don't think Obama's that naive or ineffectual. But, hey, just my opinion, too.

are you high, or just fucking stupid

if hillary is so fucking electable, why isn't she winning the fucking election ???

you fools keep telling me how hillary is such a great candidate, so why is Barack Obama kicking her ass ???

and you fucking idiots think mcsame is gonna be harder to beat than hillary has been ???

get a fucking clue

mcsame is selling a failed war, a failed economic plan, a failed health plan, and a false reform plan

hillary is closer to American values that john mcsame

and Obama is wiping the floor with hillary

stop telling me how electable hillary is

I judge by results

and hillary is in SECOND PLACE FOLKS

pull yer heads out of your assholes and look at the results

Why is Hillary losing the primary when I think she has a better chance at the general election? Because the democratic primary is not the same as the general election. Because Reverend Wright came to light late into the primary season in PA where Obama already had a sizeable lead (previous to that he was doing much stronger with the white vote). Because there are states like SC, NC, MS, LA where half of the democratic party electorate is African American - when 90% of those folks are voting for Obama, that means he is likely to win those states by a large margin. In the general election, "gimmie" states like that don't exist. Because the general election is more similar to primaries than caucuses where it is not tilted towards the younger, white collar, more affluent, more motivated folks who have a few hours to kill to all report to a caucus site. Because primaries favor the more move on.org / liberal wing of the party. Notice how Barack's criticism of Hillary in the democratic primary for saying she would engage in vigorous diplomacy with the world's dictators but would not pledge that would not declare she is willing to meet with them in her first year was "a continuation of the bush policy of non-engagement with enemoes". Now that he is potentially facing McCain in the general election, he's moderated his postion and taken that off the table. Quite unprincipled in my opinion.

I could go on and on and on, but it is clear that to win the democratic nomination does not necessarily mean you will the same appeal to the general electorate.

Amen, you're preaching to this choir. I've already told the California Democratic Party not to expect any more donations from me. My money will go to individual candidates from here on out.

It's the obligation of the party's nominee to get his supporters to fund the party for the next four years. Good luck to him.

user-pic

Well, at least they can save some money by not sending the MI and FL delegates.

user-pic

I have given to specific candidates, but recently have not given to the DNC or DSCC, DCCC because their leadership has been pathetic. I told a couple of DCCC phone bankers that as long as Congress gave BushCO a pass in Congress they would not get a dime. Reid and Pelosi have caved too many times. After all, they control the aggenda, so in truth, they can't claim not to have the votes. They allow bad legislation to come to a vote when they don't have to. If they had half the Congressional discipline that the GOP musters, half the Administration would be under indictment.

Ditto that. In response to DNC donation solicitation emails, I've told them that until I see some real leadership, the checkbook stays closed to the DNC. Instead I've given to candidates, including Congressional Dems nationally via the ActBlue Web site.

user-pic

they'll raise that money in no time after next wednesday. many democrats (me included) are giving money to our candidates; once the race is over -- which it fundamentally will be after obama rolls his superdelegate stash -- we'll send some to the party. i will, at least.

user-pic

oops, i meant "rolls OUT his superdelegate stash." and hey, tpm, where that story? did i miss it?

Same of course for the DNC..both critically short of funds

That's the hard cost of indulging the Clintons

There should be full public financing of conventions.

It doesn't make sense that the DNC is barred from accepting corporate donations for other things, but can accept millions from corporations for the convention.

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address