Where's my fork? This thing is done.

The endorsement was balanced by a few negative statements about Hillary, too:

"Clinton regrettably has pandered more to voters, particularly on gas prices, than Obama."

"Clinton also was an integral part of her husband's political machine, which earned a reputation for flattening opponents. That factor understandably gives many voters pause about whether another Clinton should serve as president."

"Meanwhile, Barack Obama has picked up a new super-delegate this morning, 1980s DNC chair Paul Kirk of Massachusetts."

Eric, why is this an afterthoguht?

Love that Zogby poll..... Obama up by 16 in NC and tied in IN.

But go ahead and dismiss THOSE numbers, gotalife.

Your lobotomy scars are showing again.

Clear eyed view of the way things are? Like the $10 billion handout she wants to give to oil companies that she is now attacking Democrats in Congress for not supporting??

http://www.thepersonalispolitical.com/2008/05/hillary-goes-after-democrats-in.html

That "endorsement" is hilarious- has to be the most back-handed one I've ever seen.

You'll see! Attacking Congressional Democrats on the moronic Clinton - McCain gas tax holiday is bound to net her more supers, since many of them are... Congressional Democrats. Oh, wait...

Hahahaha ohhhhh HOO HOO HOO hahahahahha hehehehehe STOP!

Clinton wins NC? HAHAHAHAh Dream on Clinton fan.

Clinton wins IN by 10? Hahahahah You need to pass whatever you're smoking, cuz' you got the good stuff!

North Carolina has a big white majority.

Hilary looks longingly on the Republican party's nominating process. No doubt she does because, given her very economical attitude towards the truth, her willingness to pander, the Rove/Atwater like use of race baiting by her campaign, and her unabashed war mongering, she seems to be very much like a Republican. In fact, her real slogan should be: "The Clintons, Losing Democratic Majorities in Congress since 1994." Don't think the elected Super Delegates aren't thinking about how the Clintons wrecked the Democratic party in the 1990's, and comparing that to Obama's 50 State grass roots strategy, which would build up the Democratic party. For the Republicans, Clinton is a no lose proposition, she is the weaker candidate and, even if she wins, can be counted on to do something they can't do themselves, rebuild the Republican party.

Andrew addresses his switch on Countdown with Keith Olbermann:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9g5_AOlg2ak

Just wait until Mickey Kantor-gate.

Kantor, by the way, is the epitome of a Clintonite -- a corporate lawyer and lobbyist who led the charge for NAFTA as Bill's USTR. Exactly the kind of elitist -- in the true meaning of the term -- who has no place in the next Democratic administration.

This is about as ringing as that DMR "endorsement."