« Hillary Closes To Within Three Points In Gallup National Tracking Poll | Home | Hillary Nabs A Super-Delegate »

Top Hillary Fundraisers Rip Into Howard Dean For Saying Super-Dels Should Announce Support "Starting Now"

Two of Hillary Clinton's most prominent fundraisers tore into Howard Dean in interviews with me today, sharply criticizing the DNC chair for saying yesterday that super-delegates should say which Dem candidate they support "starting now."

"Governor Dean should do what he has said he will do -- refrain from injecting himself into the primary process, as millions of Democrats have yet to cast their votes," Hillary national finance chair Hassan Nemazee, one of the most influential fundraisers in the Democratic Party, told me today.

"If he wishes to do something productive," Nemazee continued, "he should exhibit the leadership necessary to resolve the Florida and Michigan impasse, which has disenfranchised millions of Democratic voters."

A second prominent Democratic fundraiser, Robert Zimmerman, a Democratic National Committeeman and key Hillary fundraiser, sounded a similar note in an interview with me today.

"Howard Dean is more committed to pressuring the super delegates to make up their minds before the voting is done than he is to ensuring that Michigan and Florida's votes are counted," Zimmerman charged.

He added that Dean could "best ensure that we have a strong Democratic nominee and a united party" by focusing on those two states, rather than pressuring super-dels.

It's unusual for major institutional players like Nemazee and Zimmerman to attack the party chair in such biting terms, and the comments represent the boiling over of tensions between Dean and top Hillary money people that have simmered out of view for weeks.

Asked for a response, DNC spokesperson Karen Finney said: "Governor Dean's position remains the same and is consistent with what he has said for weeks now, that ideally he'd like super-delegates to continue to make their preferences known by the end of June."

Though it's unclear what Dean can do to force a resolution of the Florida and Michigan situations, Hillary fundraisers are frustrated that Dean hasn't used his role as party leader to push harder behind-the-scenes for a compromise between the campaigns.

Earlier this month, major Hillary fundraisers exchanged sharp words with Dean at a private donor summit meeting in Manhattan. Now they've gone public with their displeasure, and it's probably not lost on the DNC that many major Hillary donors are also major DNC fundraisers.

Hillary money people also targeted House Speaker Nancy Pelosi not long ago, writing her a letter tacitly threatening to withhold funds if she didn't publicly embrace the stance that super-dels should be free to use their own judgment in deciding between the candidates.

The Dean quote that set off Hillary's fundraisers today was this, on CNN:

"I need them to say who they're for starting now...We cannot give up two or three months of active campaigning and healing time. We've got to know who our nominee is." A bit later, Dean reiterated his previous position that he wants this wrapped up by June.

Late Update: Here's Dean's full quote:

I need them to say who they're for starting now. They really do need to do that. We cannot give up two or three months of active campaigning and healing time. We've got to know who our nominee is. There's no reason not to know after the last primary on June 3rd. So the superdelegates have been pretty good so far. They've trickled in, made alliances known as things have gone on. They need to keep doing that so we can get all this wrapped up in June.

188 Comments

| Leave a comment

Is it just me or is everyone getting tired of Hillary's fundraisers?

It's just you.

user-pic

No it isn't.

user-pic

BREAKING NEWS:

Hillary's fundraisers have access to Hillary's talking points...and are willing to use them!

Yawn.

Seriously, this is silly. What else would they say? Greg, you are sowing the seeds of division by trying to gin up some intra-party controversy here.

The truth is that Florida and Michigan have only themselves to blame for the shenanigans they pulled and Hillary's fundraisers have only Hillary to blame for the problems of her candidacy.

user-pic

I am beyond tired of reading bullshit remarks like this one, ohiomeister. It was the state PARTIES, not the voters, who engaged in this high-stakes game of chicken to fuck regular folks out of being able to cast a meaningful primary vote.

PLEASE STOP BLAMING THE VOTERS OF MI AND FL like we had some sort of control or say in the primary calendar debacle!

GodDAMN that makes me angry!

user-pic

I do feel for you but you are absolutely right - your state party fucked you out of your vote.

Just like our country did in 2000 and 2004.

Actually, it was the incompetent leaders in Florida who screwed the rest of us in 2000, (maybe this year is karma for Florida), and the Crooked elections in Ohio that screwed us in 2004.

Nobody outside of Florida screwed up Florida.

rtbg, are you in MI or FL? What are the state parties like there?

I'm new to the Democratic Party. This is a strange experience, I'll tell ya. Crazy.

This primary season brought some problems the party didn't expect, but after time goes by, and with 20-20 hindsight, maybe this'll be a good thing. IF party leadership learns from this, that is.

The voters of those states need to respond decisively against the state officials they elected who caused them to lose their vote. If voters truly feel wronged they direct their frustration toward those who deprived them of their vote.


The voters of both FL and MI need to hold their represenatives accountable for their inappropriate actions on their (voters) behalf.

Fair warned is usally fair(ly) armed, but NOT this time.

user-pic

and who voted for the members of the state legislature who approved the move?

in a democracy, the voters are always accountable and responsible.

user-pic

The delegates from Florida and Michigan will be seated, but at the end of the line when it no longer matters. And hopefully, this will have taught the party a lesson they won't soon forget. The Republicans had the right idea when they told the rogue states: "Fine. Hold your primary early, but your votes will only count for half."

That was a FAR better approach.

Yes, it was the STATE PARTIES. In other words, Florida and Michigan DEMOCRATS have only themselves to blame for the debacle.

Uncle,

The voters in Florida and Michigan were screwed, it was by their leaders in those states. They were told the rule in advance, told what the punishment for violating those rules would be in advance, and they went ahead and violated the national party rules anyway.

Were those Democratic voters screwed?

Yep.

So is there some reason why the national party should change the rules and let them screw the rest of us Democrats nationally?

Nope.

The national leaders are responsible to all of us. No special arrangements for scofflaws. Period. It just encourages them.

The Democratic voters in Florida and Michigan should punish their state leaders. They are responsible. Change your leaders. Quit whining, and ignore the Republicans and the media who are stoking the feeling of victimhood. You guys were victimized by your own local leaders.

Sorry YUB. Are you a MI or FL voter? You certainly did get a raw deal. I have the feeling the party allowed this fiasco because everyone expected the primaries to be over by Feb 5. Hope they learned from this.

user-pic

The truth is that Florida and Michigan have only themselves to blame for the shenanigans they pulled...

Wayne Barrett (investigative reporter for the Village Voice) has an interesting story, "Could the Republicans Pick the Democratic Nominee? -- The Untold Story of How the GOP Rigged Florida and Michigan" up at Huffington Post. Here's the link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wayne-barrett/could-the-republicans-cou_b_94158.html

A couple of interesting tidbits from the article:

* "The DNC is charged, under its rules, to determine whether the Democrats in a noncompliant state made a "good faith" effort to abide by the party's electoral calendar, and to impose the full weight of its available penalties, namely a 100 percent takedown of a state's delegation, only if Democratic leaders in that state misbehaved."

* "The rules also demand that the DNC's 30-member Rules and Bylaws Committee conduct "an investigation, including hearings if necessary" into these matters. The purpose of such a probe is to figure out if Democratic leaders in a state that did move up "took all provable, positive steps and acted in good faith" to either "achieve legislative changes" to bring a state into compliance or to "prevent legislative changes" that took a state out of compliance. A DNC spokesman could not point to any real "investigation" the party conducted of the actions of "relevant Democratic party leaders or elected officials," as the rules put it. All that happened with Florida, for example, was that two representatives of the state party made a pitch for leniency immediately before the Rules Committee voted for sanctions."

If you read the article, you'll see that Democrats in the legislatures of both states had concerns about the move-up legislation and both state Dem parties tried to stop it, but the GOP majorities were easily able to have their way.

BTW, New Hampshire, Iowa and South Carolina did exactly the same thing as Florida and Michigan and suffered no penalty at all. What the Dean brothers and the Rules Committee are up to is anybody's guess, but it is absolutely not true that Florida and Michigan "have only themselves to blame."

Yes, it is.

user-pic

Is not! Is not! Is not!

I second that. It certainly isn't just you. Lots of people are getting tired of fundraisers threatening to take their marbles and go home. Just go already! We'll all chip in to buy more marbles!

Go home George Soros!

That was uncalled for.

What about Hillary's association with Richard Mellon Scaif, now there's an evil man who has been at the forefront of screwing America for decades.

user-pic

I think it's a new day and the people have taken over. Obama can fund his campaign without these elite.

Yes it is. Dean she remain neutral and not try to pull a Nancy pelosi.

user-pic

Not in the least.

I can understand your desire for Dean to stop pressuring the superdelegates. A letter to Chairman Dean signed by all of Hillary's grassroots supporters seems like an appropriate way to protest his statements.

But don't you think it's...unseemly for top-drawer fundraisers to use their money-might to threaten the Democratic Party? That feels so wrong to me. And franky, they aren't helping Hillary's image by acting like that.

Aw hell. This was supposed to be in response to one of rtbg's comments.

rtbg,

I can understand your desire for Dean to stop pressuring the superdelegates. A letter to Chairman Dean signed by all of Hillary's grassroots supporters seems like an appropriate way to protest his statements.

But don't you think it's...unseemly for top-drawer fundraisers to use their money-might to threaten the Democratic Party? That feels so wrong to me. And franky, they aren't helping Hillary's image by acting like that.

They're repellent and obnoxious but they have a point. The voting isn't finished. Dean had an impossible task before him considering the power of the Clintons in the party and his still outsider status compared to the way they can pull the levers, but I fear we can't say he's risen above the situation.

The voting doesn't have to be finished for the winner to be determined. Normally the nominee is clear long before the primaries are over.

user-pic

Besides, Gov. Dean said that he wanted the supers to declare by June 3, not instantly. On that date, the voting will be over.

Not just you. The Obama Campaign perfected what the Dean Campaign started, in utilizing the internet to give voice to the American people by way of raising huge amounts of small donations. I hope the Democratic Party will return to it's roots and show the big donor who demand things for their donations the door.

It helps that Obama is reasonable and correct on every issue.

I'm tired of them ..

user-pic

I didn't know Hillary still had any backers. Are these people stupid? They should just toss their money out the window. At least it might go to someone who can use it.

So Greg as regard:in interviews with me today" who else did they have interviews with today?

user-pic

Har.

Rich elitist Democrats harping away because their candidate is about to lose.

God, the best thing about this primary is that it will finally tear the DLC out of the Democratic Party for good. Fucking corporate centrists.

user-pic

But don't you understand, these people are RICH! Since they are rich they are inherently better people than you and I and we should all do whatever they say. My tiny $25 and $50 dollary donations to Obama pale in comparison to what they can give (as long as they get special targetted tax breaks on their custom yachts). To put it bluntly, we have to do what they say because they have money.

user-pic

No one can legally donate more than $2300 to either Clinton or Obama, for the Primary Election campaign. It doesn't matter how rich you are. These wealthy folks have clout only in their ability to donate to the Democratic Party, not to a candidate. When millions of us are donating $25 a month to the Democratic Party, the wealthy donors have no clout period. (You are one of us donating monthly, right?)

user-pic

Yes, I am, and uh, I was joking.

You didn't think I was serious, did you?

user-pic

The big funders have already given $4600 each to Hillary, and they've also twisted the arms of people who work for them, or who owe them for other reasons, to contribute as well. They also give big money to the DSCC and DCCC (where an individual can give something like $28K), plus $2300 to each federal officeholder, and they've tried to twist the arms of Congress and the Senate as well.

Now Obama has put together a fundraising machine big enough so he isn't in debt to those kinds of people. Not so for the Clintons, whose careers are based on stroking wealthy Dem-leaning billionaires and hundred-millionaires.

user-pic

I agree. I mean, really, who hasn't decided by now who they want to get the nomination?

the end is near for Hillary Clinton's campaign.


the Undertaker's presence looms.

"If he wishes to do something productive," Nemazee continued, "he should exhibit the leadership necessary to resolve the Florida and Michigan impasse, which has disenfranchised millions of Democratic voters."

Actually, Mr Nemazee, unlike you Howard Dean is doing something to resolve FL's and MI's awkward situation. By urging the supers to come off the bench, he is helping us get to a place where we have a clear nominee. At that point the winner (be it Clinton or be it Obama) will be at liberty to be magnanimous by agreeing to seat the MI and FL delegations as they stand, knowing that they will not make a difference (although I would hope that the superdelegates from these states would not be seated, because they are the folks who caused this mess in the first place, so it is only right that they should be made to wear the dunce caps).

user-pic

The idea that the DNC can dictate to a State is absurd.

The DNC is a corporation, the State of Florida is soverign. Not to mention that the State of Florida picked up the $20 million tab for running the election.

This is just the sort of pissing contest you get when short men are in charge.

If it amuses you to adopt such a rhetorical pose, I will not begrudge you the pleasure thusly derived. I am sure it is hardly necessary to point out that your stance is absurd on its face, so I will not belabor the point.

user-pic

The Democratic Party has the absolute right to determine how and on what terms that the Democratic Party chooses its candidate for President. This is settled law. See California Democratic Party v. Jones, 530 U.S. 567 (2000) for details.

user-pic

The Democratic Party has an absolute right to dictate how and by what means it determines its candidate for Presdient. This is settled law -- see California Democratic Party v. Jones, 530 U.S. 567 (2000), for details.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Democratic_Party_v._Jones

Uh, the Democratic Primary is an intra-party election. It's not organized by the State of Florida. And the State of Florida cannot dictate rules to the Democratic National Committee.

And to respond to the Man with the Finger: Voters in Florida and Michigan DID have control over this situation because it was agreed to by their elected DNC representatives. You might want to learn how the party works before assuming you're being victimized by powers beyond the reach of your Mighty Digit.

user-pic

See reply to ohiomeister above, and kiss my ass!

Excuse me, I think you are misreading my post. I was careful to say that it is the superdelegates (that is to say, party officials) from FL and MI who should be punished because they (not ordinary voters) caused the problem. I agree that the ordinary voters had rather little say in the mess and thus it is not desirable to level a sanction which punishes them if it is possible to avoid it.

WHINE!!!!! WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Cry babies.

In response to this:
"he should exhibit the leadership necessary to resolve the Florida and Michigan impasse, which has disenfranchised millions of Democratic voters."

I will reiterate. There is no impasse.

DNC said they'd strip states moving their primaries up from 5 February, excepting NH, NV, IA, & SC. FL and MI moved their primaries up. DNC stripped their delegates. End of story.

Sure, sure, that is an entirely just point of view. That said, surely there are other considerations in play beyond just rule-of-law. We should want our fellow democrats in Florida (like my Aunt) and Michigan (like my old comrades in the microbiology dept of the Univ of MI) to have a seat at the table in Denver. It would be thoroughly regrettable if they did not, even if it would be their own d@#^ fault. Fortunately, however, I feel very confident that this will all be resolved rather neatly in a very few weeks time.

no, there are not other considerations. if this had been seen as an issue of disenfranchisement, then Hillary should have been stamping her feet when it was announced, instead, she signed off on it, twisted her position to one that could then be, on some delusional level, be used to try and wring some extra votes / delegates out of it when it suits. this is pathetic, petulant, and dishonest... perhaps I just answered my own questions on how this happened.

I agree with flufferwink too, "Those rich fat cats can go fuck themselves."

no, there are not other considerations. if this had been seen as an issue of disenfranchisement, then Hillary should have been stamping her feet when it was announced...

Sure, I will be the first to agree that Sen Clinton's behavior in this fiasco has been abominable, but that is rather beside my point. The rules are the rules, this is true. Surely though, I need not labor long to point out that rule-of-law is only one good among many. Gov Dean has no divisions of soldiers or money-machines to compel people to vote democratic. He can only persuade, and his (and our) ability to persuade people to vote democratic depends on being conciliatory, even (at least at times) if justice must suffer in the process.

As I said, however, I dare say that none of this matters. In a few weeks, Obama will have unambiguously sealed up the nomination. The supers will get behind him in a massive wave (including a considerable chunk of supers presently listed as being in Clinton's column). At that point, he will instruct his people (who will, at that point, be in charge of the convention) to seat FL and MI as they stand in a gracious gesture of magnaminity. The whole problem will be resolved and (most) everyone will be happy.

user-pic

Well, that is a relief. I've been waiting to see if anything will make Senator Clinton happy. I will be happy too, once Senator Obama is selected as our candidate, so both Senator Clinton and I will be happy. That should make everyone else happy.

Dear Mr Calif,

I am happy that you are happy (or hoppy, come to that).

Right on ghost boy!

See my post at the bottom of the page. (look for Aslan-the Narnia Lion:)

user-pic

Well, it's too late now, I realize, but it makes a pretty good case that regular people should get more involved in their state party politics. It's pretty convenient to just have to show and vote a couple times a year, but really, the process is never ending and if you aren't more involved, then you get what you paid for, so to speak.

user-pic

What's missing here in your comment is any acknowledgement that states are entirely separate from VOTERS, and fucking them over because of some pissing contest over which they had no controlis fucking STUPID.

Does it not seem a touch silly to say that the states are completely separate from the voters? Who put those state officials in office? I agree that, to the extent that it is possible, it is best to punish the bigwigs more than the common folks. You just make yourself look foolish by pressing that sound sentiment to the extreme by insisting that voters and the state officials have no connection to each other.

Incidentally, if you really feel that way, why are you bickering with Angry Vet. What does he have to do with your situation. It seems to me that you would do better to take your frustrations out on your governors and state reps than on folks here. We did not cause your problem.

This from the folks who kept saying it would all be over on Feb. 4? It would be funny if it weren't so ... unfunny.

Top Hillary Fundraisers have turned bitter
and are now clinging to their Traditional Elitist Fat Cat
Culture.

Senator Hillary, $107 Million, Clinton feels their

Elitest Pain!!!!

I'd be pissed if my investments turned sour, too.

user-pic

Owww, dang, I felt that one. Nice!

Hillary's integrity is NOT up for sale, it's already been sold.

user-pic

Seconded! Sold to an American!!!!

zing!

nice work.

user-pic

You called it.

Elitist pulling strings.

Standard operating procedure for the Clintons.

Dean is all over the place and scared to death Obama will lose.

This is a democracy, let the people vote and do your job by raising money for the Dems.

You are way behind.

Did I miss the part of the statement where Dean said that all the supers needed to endorse Obama now? All I heard him say is that they need to endorse. How is this indicative of a fear that Obama will lose. If Clinton's superdelegate advantage is as real as you and your ilk have been saying, then surely she should welcome the call for them to come out in the open with their endorsements.

And in addition, wasn't it the Clinton campaign that said the superdelegates (er, automatic delegates) aren't beholden to follow the will of the voters? So, why take umbrage at Dean's call to make a decision?

Good point.

We'd be able to raise money for the Democratic Party nationally if the primaries would finally end...

Gotalife,

Do any of these voodoo posts really work?

Maybe you need to recharge your amulet and try organic chickens, or hop on the other foot for these political incantations.

user-pic

So I assume you agree that the pledged delegates, chosen by the voters, to represent our voices, should actually vote for the person that got the most votes?

Or do you agree that pledged delegates (not just supers) can vote for whovever they want and screw the voters?

Apparently Hillary thinks so.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vqU0mH_tO0

But to the voters she tells a different story
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_eBIpEuO4U

The people voted and Obama won -- TWO MONTHS AGO.
Hillary has been acting like she works for the Republican campaign for TWO MONTHS. Its about time she shut up and sat down.

user-pic

One caveat: There's no way Hillary can win.

user-pic
"Governor Dean should do what he has said he will do -- refrain from injecting himself into the primary process, as millions of Democrats have yet to cast their votes," Hillary national finance chair Hassan Nemazee, one of the most influential fundraisers in the Democratic Party, told me today.

Here's thought - why don't you shut up and quit acting like some kind of machine political goon and trying to lean on the party to do what you want it to do, asshole?

Because I resent the everloving hell out of this bullshit pressure from big money donors -

It will not be forgotten.

This is better than Comedy Central.

Two of Hillary's Garfield like Fat Cats throw tantrums,

And demand that Howard Dean "should refrain from injecting himself in the primary process"

But, wait for it folks:

The very next meows out of the same pair of Hillary's Garfields are:

"Mr. Dean, inject yourself in the Florida and Michigan primary process"

user-pic

Ya nailed it!

Hypocrisy: It's not just for breakfast anymore.

user-pic

Brilliant.

Those rich fat cats can go fuck themselves.

What are they yelling about?
If their girl is so confident her arguments about electability are going to work in August, why not pull those strings now and get 250-300 Supers to endorse her and put her back ahead in the delegate count like she started with back in January.

Precisely what I said in a post the other day. If Hillary is so confident that the superdelegates are going to swing her way, she would want to lock them down by 3 AM tonight. Where is the problem that these people see with delegates declaring earlier than later?

The answer is obvious. If the supers had to declare by 3 AM tonight, then Obama would be the nominee.

So the Clinton position of putting it off as long as possible stands on this very thin ice that they are going to force the MI and FL issue at the convention. The flaw in this reasoning is that by then even if they throw in both states in fair proportions to both candidates, Obama would still win UNLESS Clinton wins 64% of the remaining states, on the average. Then and only then will MI and FL help her.

The Clinton camp is thrashing around in futility.

user-pic

Yup, she had no prob whatsoever with them picking her early on when NO votes had yet been cast, before she started losing her Joementum in February.

user-pic

She's staying in using the Huckabee defense. You know, Guliani's ratings were pretty high until the whole "Rudy's girlfriend used NYPD as taxi service" thing.

They are hoping against hope that someone turns up some Larry Craig or Black Panther moment on Obama to snatch it up.

That is not going to happen of course, which is why they are trying so hard to manufacture one - Rezko, Wright, Ayers - but nothing sticks. As long as they stay in though, something just may come up that will, so they believe.

They just cannot fathom that there may just be in this world a "clean" politican. They are in complete denial. They don't know anyone that does not have their hands dirty in some way shape or form. Such is old Washington politics.

user-pic

The same Nemazee who signed the extortion letter to Nancy Pelosi? Shocker there.

Excellent catch!

user-pic

liam - good point and good reading comprehension. Everything after the first paragraph turned red for me cause I was so damn mad.

This is like blackmail from these assholes and it also is very very very demeaning to all of us $25-$250 donors to Obama - like we don't matter as much.

Dean didn't say they had to back the leader in pledged delegates now. Why so affraid?

!!!HILLMENTUM™!!!!

At what point are these people going to emerge from denial and cut their losses?

I know most people here love Dean, but I think he's been a disaster. I'm sure there are terribly important political considerations I'm not aware of, but Dean should have come out against Hillary's ridiculous stance on these two states -- which was not voiced, of course, until seconds after SC voted -- immediately. He should have sent out a release after her charade victory party in FL, he should have gone on television mocking her that night, and not stopped. Instead, he went into Cheney's bunker for the better part of 6 weeks and now we are where we are: No one in the party is paying him a bit of attention and FL & MI are disasters. This has been a PR war and Dean is losing it for the Dems.

Dean's been a disaster for the GOP. For the Democratic Party, he's gotten a lot more people registered and voting than the previous couple of chairmen, which is great, and they may very well become the core for organizing the next couple fo campaigns.

The campaigns are organizing people to vote, not Dean. I've volunteered in four states this cycle and it's the campaigns on the ground.

I'm not trying to diminish Dean's vision of a 50-state strategy. I do think that has been important, and he's clearly been allocating resources toward that effort. My "disaster" comment was really about this FL & MI effort. It's a huge, huge deal and any other achievement of his will be glossed over if those states blow up. I don't see how anyone can look at how he's dealt with it thus far and called him successful.

Hm, there is still, despite all the overheated hand-wringing on the subject, no evidence whatever that the MI situation is hurting our prospects there in the fall. Indeed, Obama is ahead of McCain in the head-to-head polls there. As such, it seems terribly premature to fret that Dean is threatening our chances in MI. Meanwhile, we lose FL all the time. Indeed, the last time a non-incumbant Democrat picked up FL was Carter in 1976. As such, if we lose FL, it seems to me that it would be rather a stretch to infer that the loss is the result of anything that Gov Dean or the DLC did.

That's right, and if Hillary... um... prevails, look for her minions to whack Howard Dean, pronto.

Meaning: the end of downticket victories, and the return to permanent Democratic minority status and irrelevance. The Democratic Party will be all about the Clintons... AGAIN.

I like Dean but Im afraid you're right. He's been way too improvisational.

But let's not forget the big picture-Dean made a great contribution that I think will be given its historical due one day.

He is almost single handedly responsible for one of the true sea changes in American politics. He showed by action that by using the power of the internet a candidate could raise money just as well as the big boys by appealing to masses of supporters. Remember how powerful that was? This is the very reason he was made the Chairman.

Obama and his supporters got it! Perhaps if Hillary was more of a UNITER she and her hubby would not have been estranged from Dean, and they could have profited from Dean's example.

Instead she is running out of money and according to the news she has been burning some of the organizers by not paying her bills.

Come to think of it! Why was she not asked about THAT Wednesday night!

Wow. It's a real bummer when the great unwashed turn out to have more money and power than the fat cats. So much of a bummer that apparently they've decided to take their whining public.

What the fat cats failed to realize is that we, the great unwashed, are taking great pleasure in the shock and dismay of these asshats realizing they don't get to dictate how it goes when they chose the losing side. This? is some of the funniest and most entertaining stuff of the whole political season.

Wow, has the Democratic party always been this screwed up or am I just now noticing it?

You are just now noticing it. The somewhat anarchic workings of our party has been the norm for some time now. As the great Will Rogers quipped in the first term of the Roosevelt administration, "I am a member of no organized political party - I am a democrat."

"I am not a member of any organized political party. I am a Democrat". Will Rodgers.

Does that answer your question.

Beat me.

Greg:

Will you ask the Clinton campaign about their March fundraising numbers, since they have to file the FEC report today?

Penned-up pigs always squeal.

There go the big Hillary moneybags again, shooting off their mouths. Old politics. Old politics.

Good for Howard Dean. F*ck Clinton's money men. They don't run the party.

I'm an Obama "fundraiser" and he seems to be cleaning her clock in that department.

user-pic

Dito

Remember, Hillary signed an oath stating that she would not campaign in FL and MI. Just think of what she would do if Obama won those states? She would be crying foul if he was to get those delagates. She knew what she was supporting when she signed that letter of intent. She is and agenda driven politician fighting for her political career, and she should it is all she can do. Take a second and imagine if both sides agreed to split the delagates 50 /50. There is no guarantee that they will stay the same. People can change their mind. Also, what if they were to go to a given precinct and 20 delegates could be awarded for each candidate. There is a chance that no Obama supporters would show up or vice versa. Anything is possible. Plus there would be no need for the disenfranchisement argument. But no, she wanted all of them based on the proportion of the election and then accused Obama of not letting the democratic proess work. They even accused him of running ads in Fl, when she won!!!! So it stalemated and may never get fixed. I would say that this is all Dean's fault. He should of allowed the state to make a choice for themselves and lived with it. But instead he played hardball and the Republicans in FL, for example, took advantage of it. So if he cannot fix this, then the 50 state strategy is bunk and he should be replaced.

user-pic

It's become clearer by the day that the Clintons are the Godfather of the Party and we should all kiss the ring and dutifully perform the coronation of Hillary. This election season is making me sick,. There is no hope for this country. Politics are so corrupt now within BOTH parties.

The question to ask Dean is what are doing about Florida and Michigan?

Why are you not getting donations like the gop?

Why is he not doing his job?

Well you see Gotalife,

your poor benighted wee troll,

Hillary's Garfield like Fat Cats demanded that he not inject himself into the primary process.

Their wish was his command. Hillary must be ecstatic that Howard is doing what her Garfields meowed to him.

I bet she will toss down a few Boiler Makers to celebrate the success of her two Fat Cats.

I

I just sent another $50 to the DNC.

Tell Nemazee to stop whining.

user-pic

I'd much rather these things coming from supporters or surrogates instead of fundraisers. I know I'm cynical; but I always jump to the idea that they are throwing their money around and protecting their investment rather than fighting "for the people" or anything like that.

user-pic

I'm sure that this will go over just great with the superdelegates, just like the last time Hillary's fundraisers tried to act like they were the real power behind the party.

They're watching their ambassadorships go up in smoke. Talk about whiners.

Actually, Bill Clinton did try to give an Argentina ambassadorship to Nemazee.

Didn't know that, thanks. Was he rejected? Or does he have another shot at it? Maybe something that's too small, poor or dangerous...like Bosnia.

That's why they gave the ambassadorship to a teenage girl. Oh wait . . .

user-pic

I'd love to know how I could contact these people and tell them just what I think of their tactics.

This should be illegal.

Keep in mind one of the other and most important toxic side effects of Hillary's strong-arming committed delegates into handing her the nomination "because she's Hillary":

Howard Dean goes away. Probably involuntarily.

Dean, put bluntly, saved the Democratic Party's ass.

He goes, the Democratic Party once again becomes all about the Clintons. The downticket offices will wither on the vine. Again.

user-pic

This fricking primary is the real distraction.

Call your own Superdelegates and urge them to end this circle jerk now.

While these corner-office cronies shoot off at the mouth, real Americans are still being shipped to Iraq against their will to shoot at people they don't care to kill.

FUCK THIS. We didn't need them to raise the money, and we don't need them to end the race.

GIVE YOUR REPS HELL.

Please recommend a href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/04/i-just-watched-a-man-choke-bac.php">this blog to keep people talking.

NOT.THIS.TIME

Death throes.

They don't have a point.

Hillary had 100 or so super delegate lead before Iowa. So for her to talk about supers having to wait until PA to decide is pure hypocrisy.

But leave it to the MSM to ignore such blatant hypocrisy > Obama rules.

user-pic

HRC's fat cats can go fuck themselves. And there is no "impass" over FL and MI. They broke the rules and their delegates are out, end of story.

Why are they so effin' uppity? I mean, he didn't tell them to go out and endorse Obama now or anything. It makes you feel that they, the fundraisers, already know that the undecided supers have already made up their minds for Obama. If so, then Hillary '08 is already finished. It makes no sense.

The Clintons LLC - A Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organization

F***k these wealthy party hacks who think they own this party.

We are taking it back in Obama's name and WE WILL NOT BE DENIED.

Does anyone here doubt that if Obama and Clinton's positions were switched that these same hacks would be screaming for Obama to bow out for the good of the party!

Unfortunately for these old timers-who by the way-should get out of the way-they had their chance and things are no better than when they started out in the 60's and 70's- there is a new generation of inspired young voters who do not abide by hypocritical standards.

The time to challenge Fl and Mi was BEFORE ALL candidates agreed to disenfranchise them so that there could be a uniform response. If Clinton or Obama had wanted to thwart the DNC that would have been fine-BEFORE-when they could have each campaigned in those states.

Obama's name was not even on the Mi Ballot.

Give me a break you hacks-go back into the dark cigar filled room from whence you came.
We do not need you any more. The internet has made you irrelevant!

Dean is the Chair and he has been much more neutral toward the candidates than any of you would have been in the same circumstances. As a matter of fact he has fulfilled his fiduciary duty to a tee-
"A Director must discharge her duties in good faith and with that degree of diligence, care and skill that an ordinarily PRUDENT PERSON would exercise under similar circumstances in like position."

I showed this to the radical right.

They loved it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zhkq11UExcw

Nuff said.

You showed it to yourself?

user-pic

itself and its freeper buddies

How is contacting our superdelegates going to bring soldiers back from Iraq any sooner? Sorry, I honestly don't see the connection.

A) Bush is still in office, and he shows no signs of leaving Iraq before he leaves office.

B) If you think Republicans aren't going to try to distract the voters about Iraq, even if the Dems have a nominee, you are living in an alternate universe.

c) We are going to stay in Iraq as long as there is oil there. You seem to be distracted from the real reason we are in Iraq.

My comment is in response to Slouch upthread.

This is great news for Obama, the more these Hillary numbnuts whine and complain, the more i and a lot of people will continue donating to the Obama campaign. Keep it up you "elitist" whores!

This would be funny if it wasn't so hypocritical. I think if the roles were reversed these same people would be telling Gov. Dean to get off his butt and end this thing. Then again they probably wouldn't have to since Obama would have long ago done the right thing for the party and the GE.

Another $50 to the DNC

I hope he writes them a nice "go f*ck yourself" letter like Pelosi did.

Didn't the DNC recently get similar threats?
And didn't the DNC after receiving such threats get way more in contributions than these fund raiser goons threatened to withhold?

I don't have a link, just a vague recollection of something like that happening.

Yet again, the Clinton campaign and its surrogates find themselves caught on the horns of a contradiction.

Are superdelegates:

a.) Supposed to vote for a candidate based on their own best judgment?

or

b.) Supposed to ratify the decisions of the voters.

Because if it's a.), there's no basis for complaining that Dean is asking the SDs to hurry up and use their judgment. And if it's b.), Hillary might as well go home now, since Obama is winning every popular metric.

user-pic

Governor Dean, if these "big donors" force your hand, then take a walk on the wild side with other progressive Democrats and put a merciful end to the farce that is the Democratic Party. There are many millions of us who would follow you, Sen. Feingold, Sen. Obama, and the other principled people who are so out of fashion these days.

THE WAY OF THE WHIGS, I SAY!

This probably has as much to do with trying to re-ignite the MI and FL business than anything.

If Clinton wins PA by single digits (not enough to knock her out, but also not enough to heavily influence the NC and IN races), I'd look for her to start pushing the MI and FL stuff pretty hard again in the intervening two weeks, both for political and fundraising purposes.

DISENFRENCHFRY!

So, all those supers that endorsed Hillary way back in 2007, I'm assuming these guys want them to take it back, to let the process play out?

Same with all the Democrats that cast their vote before June. I mean, you have to know how everyone else thinks before you make a decision based on your own beliefs.

You mean DISEN-FREEDOM-FRY.

user-pic

Click here to thumb your nose at big donors


Do it. It feels real good.

TO ALL OBAMA SUPPORTERS (AND HRC SUPPORTERS WHO ARE TRUE PROGRESSIVES):

I know this process has been frustrating as hell. But I think we all need to take a step back, reflect and relax.

We are the vanguard of a real revolution in American politics. For the first time ever, a group of little guys, who are very committed, have been able to band together to actually determine the Democratic Candidate for President of the United States!

Do we all realize how monumental this is? By the power of the internet we are actually TAKING back the DEM PARTY for the people it is supposed to represent.

Of course the old fat cats will scream and shriek-no one except a saint voluntarily gives up power even for the common good.

BUT MAKE NO MISTAKE! They know that we are in the midst of a sea change and it will not go back to the cigar smoke filled rooms again.

We have almost won! Perhaps after we put Obama in the White House we can get rid of the Super delegates for good.

We are going to be the party of the people now.

I hope that we can get out of the way when our children and our children's children find a way to replace us with some mechanism that is even more representative of the people!

POWER TO THE PEOPLE!!

GO OBAMA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Didn't seem them complaining when Hillary had 100 SDs in the bag before the voting even started. Hypocritical much?

Wait, at what point did Dean say the Superdelegates should come out and announce their support for Obama?

Couldn't they come out and announce they feel Hillary is the best candidate?

Not sure what they are up in arms about, unless they think all the superdels want to go with Obama, and in that case, what argument do they have anyway?

I think what the Clintonites are really scared of is the state of their haberdashery. You see, Obama has brushed the dirt and muck off his shoulders, so his suit is still shiny and new looking. Hillary, on the other hand, has mud and muck on her pantsuit. So if it's a beauty contest and the superdelegates are the judges,then Hillary wants a chance to clean up.

But just like that famous blue dress, it's a permanent stain.

user-pic

After the 1995 Clinton 'Screw 'em' Campaign -- Welcome to the:

2008 CLINTON TO VOTERS "SCREW 'EM" CAMPAIGN

Clinton 1 'Screw 'em' Strategy:

Clinton surrogate Wolfson: ..."I want to be clear about the fact that neither campaign is in a position to win this nomination without the support of the votes of the superdelegates," Wolfson said, adding that the Clinton campaign would make no distinction between the caucus/primary delegates and the "superdelegates."

"We are interested in acquiring delegates, period," Wolfson said.

So Clinton's basic strategy?: We'll use and abuse the gullible voters thinking they are going to make a difference -- when really it's only the superdelegates we need -- THE VOTERS: 'Screw 'em' -- Let them them waste their Democratic money that could go towards beating the republicans to go towards smearing and sliming Obama... "Hell yeah!"

Clinton 2 'Screw 'em' Strategy:

Clinton..."A lot of those lobbyists, whether you like it or not, represent real Americans. They represent nurses, they represent social workers, yes, they represent corporations that employ a lot of people. I don't think, based on my 35 years of fighting for what I believe in, I don't think anybody seriously believes I'm going to be influenced by a lobbyist."

However:

"...According to data from the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics, however, Clinton's assertion doesn't quite hit the mark. While some lobbyists certainly do represent "real" people and large corporations, those who are contributing to the 2008 presidential candidates—including the senator from New York—aren't on Capitol Hill to talk about the issues of nurses or social workers, or firefighters or cops. By matching lobbyists who have donated to the presidential candidates this year with their clients, the Center found that these individuals are instead largely advocating for big industries such as pharmaceutical, automotive and computer companies.

..."Only 14 lobbyists who gave to Clinton reported representing health professionals, compared to 76 who represented the pharmaceutical industry..."

Yeah Hillary... screw the 'little guy'

Oh and remember the 2006 Lieberman vs. Lamont Clinton 'Screw 'em' Strategy:

Colin McEnroe [Salon]: "...When I asked Waters why she thought Clinton was coming to Connecticut, she said there were rumors in Washington that he and his wife are freaked out by the sudden progressive insurgency. The DLC is putting down a small rebellion before it spreads..."

Howard Dean, I believe, is advocating on behalf of the voters AND the Democratic Party. Clinton and her backers, I believe, have shown they have other interests.

Ohhh...... Those big pharma, big insurance and hedge fund management PACS are all getting upset!!

Chelsea and her boss might actually have to pay the ordinary tax rate on their income if Obama gets elected rather than the 15% capital gains tax rate...

- BrianInMKE

user-pic
He added that Dean could "best ensure that we have a strong Democratic nominee and a united party" by focusing on those two states, rather than pressuring super-dels.

Thanks for telling the chairman how to run things, asshole.

I'd dearly love to be able to tell you and the other goons who keep leaning on our leaders what I really think of you.

user-pic

Though it's unclear what Dean can do to force a resolution of the Florida and Michigan situations,

Please, Greg, don't repeat that meme. The situations are resolved. FL and MI were warned that if they tried to stomp on the NV and SC primaries by moving theirs up, they would lose their delegates. Plenty of warning, clear as day. They did it anyway, and lost their delegates, a position agreed to by all the candidates. How is this anything but resolved?

I'm sick and tired of the rich Clinton backers trying to throw their weight around & control the agenda. Howard is in charge, not them. They will really be p.o.'ed when the Clintons grip on Dem. power is in the dustbin of history! Personally, I can't wait till it's over and she can go back to the Senate and try to mend her broken fences that she's kamikazed.

Sorry, but isn't this EXACTLY why we don't want Hillary as President???

Big money backers having a say about ANYTHING at ALL

Yeah, big money backers is all anyone cares about.

Doesn't matter. It will all be over Tuesday.

user-pic
Colin McEnroe [Salon]: "...When I asked Waters why she thought Clinton was coming to Connecticut, she said there were rumors in Washington that he and his wife are freaked out by the sudden progressive insurgency. The DLC is putting down a small rebellion before it spreads..." Howard Dean, I believe, is advocating on behalf of the voters AND the Democratic Party. Clinton and her backers, I believe, have shown they have other interests.


A great big {{{{{{MWAAH!}}}}}}}} to you for that.

I think the Clintons have managed to blame, threaten, disown, demean, disrupt, blackmail, sue, drag down, kneecap, smear, steal, slander, divide and sabotage anything or anyone who gets in their way regardless of consequences. I can't keep track of their hypocrisy. They can try and sway superdelegates now, but no one else can?

They can play politics but Howard Dean can't?

I think the question on everyone's mind should be "what do these so-called "top Hillary fundraisers" expect in return for their investment in her? I think their being so vocal invites suspicion.

"The DLC is putting down a small rebellion before it spreads..."

Very illuminating.

I've found several comments here worthy of a reply, but I'll just set down my comments/replies here in a paragraph (or two).

The Hillary donors are pissed with Dean because they know how things would fall if the superdelegates declared their intentions now. Hillary's only hope, given the numbers, is to forestall any certainty as to the primary outcome long enough for something to happen to Obama. Say, their Rovian smear campaign to work or to destroy Obama's electability in the general election and use that to bolster their argument that only Hillary is electable.

I like Dean a lot and for Hillary donors to come out and trash him only makes me more of an Obama supporter. I support Dean and the grassroots and the 50-state strategy over more of the same DLC/fat cat bought-and-paid-for party/28-state strategy which has led to so many failures against the GOP as well as a spineless minority and now majority party in Congress. I support a campaign - and ultimately, a party - built upon millions of small donors rather than one financed by wealthy fat cats.

I am an Obama supporter but a very lukewarm one. However, the more Hillary and her supporters show their true colors, the more she repulses me. Win or lose, Obama and Dean are the future of the Democratic party - they HAVE to be the future of the Democratic party, if Dems are ever going to be something more to the American people than just those other guys who don't fuck things up as badly as the Republicans.

The Clintons are laughing at you whiners.

Get out of the race, you can't handle the pressure.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zhkq11UExcw

Thanks gotalife, for demonstrating once again how you Hillary folks are all class.

To think that I still stick up for this woman when right-wingers bash her. Maybe they have a point after all.

The fact is that Obama has already won. If Hillary wins by 10% in every single upcoming state, she'd still need 80% of the remaining superdelegates.
And don't go talking about FL and MI, as Hillary ran unopposed in both those states and still barely won (she only got 54% in FL, where the runner up was "other" and none of the other major candidates were on the ballot), which explains why she insists on using the under-attended elections instead of a do-over.

user-pic

UncleB...

It does not matter who was at fault. There is no provision in the US Constitution pertaining to the inner workings of the Democratic Party. It's a private organization that can do what it will in regard to its by-laws.

Besides, this is what you get when you register as a partisan.

In any event, the folks of Michigan and Florida should beat the shit out of their Party Chairfolk and quit pestering the rest of the country with their intramural squabbles, and Floridians in particular should consider how the rest of the country felt (when their state organizations blew up the 2000 General Election) before whining about their lot in the spring of 2008.

So, just simmer down, bunky. Y'all are out for the time being. It may suck to be you--but there it is...

Howard Dean is right on. Superdelegates need to come on out, because there is no such thing as an "uncommited" superdelegate. They are just undisclosed. It's time to disclose!
Clinton lost this nomination a very long time ago, and it's time to give her, her fundraisers and supporters a serious reality check!
I admire the ones who have come out thus far, and though the Clinton strategy to tar and feather any Clinton allies who see through the smoke and endorse Obama, brave souls are doing their thing. I have a feeling we will see a groundswell after Pennsylvania, despite Clinton's win. It's just not enough. Clinton is toast. Let's unite this party and defeat McCain.

I second that. The superdelegates who have supported Obama have been brave, and it is time for the rest to find their courage. THE SUPERDELEGATES ARE SUPPOSED TO STOP THIS KIND OF TRAIN WRECK, TOO. So where are they?

user-pic

I can't say I know this with certainty, but it seems to be a safe assumption that the Chair of the party is in fact a superdelegate.

So, explain to me the level of ego involved with a fundraiser, presumably *not* a superdelegate, explaining to the PARTY CHAIR and an actual superdelegate, that he has no business being involved in the superdelegate debate.

I spent most of this season favoring Hillary. But the last two months are moving me rapidly from "Hillary Supporter", through "Obama supporter", now passing "Good Lord, get the heck *over* yourselves" on my way to "God PLEASE STFU!"

Nemazee and Zimmerman, hah? Gee, I hate to say this, BUT... :-)

Wouldn't it be great if our foreign policy weren't held hostage, by the purse strings of folks with more allegiance to a foreign power, than to their own (alleged) country?

user-pic

Yep... These 'once' happy campers with Dean... seem to have changed their tune abruptly when pro-AIPAC Clinton isn't looking inevitable!~

Remember when Zimmerman was all over Dean in a nice way! ready for a *cough* Democratic Party Clinton 2008 victory.

Howard Dean Bringing In Big Money From Major Donors Once Skeptical Of Him [Greg Sargent - March 30, 2007] http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2007/03/howard_dean_bringing_in_big_mo.php

"...Top Democratic donor Robert Zimmerman describes the jump in money from the big contributors as "very significant."

"The major donors initially were skeptical of Dean and his 50-state strategy," Zimmerman says. "Dean had to prove the merits and logic of his strategies. But the success of his 50-state strategy certainly has impressed the establishment donor community. Unlike in 2004, when there was an overreliance on 527s that undermined the idea of a strong party structure, the support Dean is receiving from major donors shows a growing recognition among them that a strong DNC is an essential tool for victory in 2008."

Times do change."

"Times do change" -- or not as the case maybe.?

Those 'purse string folks' who appear to want definite purse string results?

Superdelegates for states that have already voted SHOULD CAST their f*cking votes already.

Are they retarded, cast your vote too and let's get on with this.

This year, let's change next year and eliminate the superdelegates!!!

i dont know the inner workings of the Dem party that much, but i have seen enough to know that if Hillary wins the nomination and the presidency goodbye Howard Dean.

this power struggle going on at the top of the party is between the Clintonites vs the "50 state strategy crew." the party's philosophic ways of doing things is at stake and there will be blood either way...

More extortion from Clinton Inc.

Big whoop

I guess blue-collar workers in Pennsylvania aren't the only people who are bitter.

Hassan Nemazee and Robert Zimmerman are bitter they won't get the president they paid for. Hope they turn to religion and not guns.

By the way -- were they wearing their flag pins? Can't have an opinion without a flag pin.

Meh.

The fat cats are just pissed that the new funding model Obama's developed has just made them obsolete... or at least, less relevant.

A wounded animal is the most dangerous. Time to finish them all off.

Money is power. We don't want the big money to run things any longer, do we?

I couldn't agree more. I have been an avid Obama supporter who is not rich by any means, so I've been waiting to contribute to him until he needs it...so far not necessary.

There are millions of us out here doing the same thing. All he would need to do is issue a request that the old order big money bags are withholding money from the party or downticket candidates or himself and we would all dive in with our $25-$200.

I have no worries about funding a campaign nationwide IF Obama is at the top of the ticket. If he's not, the Dems are in serious trouble and money is the least of their worries.

user-pic

Hillary and her folk make a regular practice of trashing the Democratic Party, its leaders, and its base of activists. They're a bunch of irrelevant DLC has-beens with too much money in their hands and that loathsome attitude self-importance.

Has anybody else had the thought that Bush sees himself as a kind of benevolent dictator because he knows what's best for all the rest of us----And that Hillary could easily go that same path? That thing from the debate about "massive U.S. retaliation" if Iran got in a spat with anybody at all? That sounded sort of King like since she apparently doesn't feel the congress should be involved. She has a very war like personality. She fights--all the time--with everybody--about everything. Scary.

user-pic

Someone needs to tell Nemazee and Zimmerman that they don't own the Democratic Party anymore. There's a new sheriff in town.

user-pic

Shorter Nemazee & Zimmerman: "Between us we've given Hillary Clinton almost enough to buy a used Ford Taurus. Listen to us! We're not going to be ignored!"

My sub-$100 donor friends and I are laughing our collective asses off at the whiny big donors. Instead of calling the DNC chair how about calling voters and asking them to support Hillary Clinton? That strategem somehow escaped the poohbahs of the Democraptic establishment. Good riddance to big donors.

user-pic

Reminds me of community league coaching, and now even public school coaching these days, where "fund-raisers" think that raising funds gives them the right to have a say in who plays and coaching decisions. If you want a voice, then get an official position in the party organization. Fund-raising does not make you an official leader. Presumptuous to say the least.

As for FL and MI, it was your state leaders who let this happen. You went into it with your eyes open. The ruling was there. If Hillary had won it all on Super-Tuesday, do you really think that she would give a shit about your representation?

Fundraisers who formerly got to call all the shots while we mere mortals got to thank them for their occasional crumbs: "The sky is falling, the sky is falling."

I fail to see why the concerns of a few fat cats is of any interest to me.

It's time to realign a whole bunch of things in this country, dudes. Deal. Quit being asses and put your shoulders to the wheel with the rest of us, or STFU. You may be rich, but that doesn't mean you're more important. That's what the republicans' job is.

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address