Rep. Davis (R-KY) Apologizes For Calling Obama "That Boy"
Rep. Geoff Davis (R-KY) has publicly apologized to Barack Obama after it was reported that he referred to Obama as "that boy" at a GOP fundraiser.
"My poor choice of words is regrettable and was in no way meant to impugn you or your integrity," Davis wrote in a letter that was delivered to Obama's Senate office. "I offer my sincere apology to you and ask for your forgiveness."
The remarks happened at a local GOP dinner in Davis' district on Saturday night. "I'm going to tell you something: That boy's finger does not need to be on the button," Davis declared.
The full letter is available after the jump.
Dear Senator Obama:
On Saturday night I gave a speech in which I used a poor choice of words when discussing the national security policy positions of the Presidential candidates. I was quoted as saying "That boy's finger does not need to be on the button."
My poor choice of words is regrettable and was in no way meant to impugn you or your integrity. I offer my sincere apology to you and ask for your forgiveness.
Though we may disagree on many issues, I know that we share the goal of a prosperous, secure future for our nation. My comment has detracted from the dialogue that we should all be having on legitimate policy differences and in no way reflects the personal and professional respect I have for you.
Sincerely
Geoff Davis















Well, that genie is out of the bottle right now. He can apologize, but he can't take it back.
And how about Mitch McConnell's remarks about Clinton?
Republicans truly are loathsome, sad, weird individuals, aren't they?
April 14, 2008 4:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
They are, but I fear that half of us aren't a hell of a lot better..
April 14, 2008 4:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah. Too true.
Democrats are just more sophisticated in their bigotry. No "boy" language from them, no.
April 14, 2008 5:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am surprised to find it true of some Democrats. I thought all of that backward behavior had gone to the Republican Party. This race has thrust it forward and it really hurts.
April 14, 2008 6:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
im more worried about clinton's remarks about obama. she's parroting right wing talking points and giving them credibility they otherwise wouldnt have. but now you have a DEMOCRAT saying the same things republicans say about him so it must be true...
April 14, 2008 6:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
"I'm going to tell you something: That boy's finger does not need to be on the button," Davis declared.
Hillary Annie Oakley Clinton says: ''I could not have said it better myself. Geoff Davis Gittin Er Done, like I will from day one"
April 14, 2008 4:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bad day for the Ice Queen. The lead story tonight is that she got booed. Then this garbage.
April 14, 2008 4:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Are you out of your mind? What does Davis' comment have to do with Hillary? Davis at least is man enought to apology for his poorly chosen words. What happened to your boy when he was supposed mis-speak?
April 14, 2008 5:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ding Ding Ding. Aimey May The ANT(Aryan Nation Troll) defends the use of "boy" and then calls Senator Obama "boy" her, or it's self. Hard to tell what gender to ascribe to a racist slime slug.
April 14, 2008 5:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
your girl - better?
April 14, 2008 5:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, genius - Obama's only apologized several times, that's all. He's said he regrets if anyone was offended by what he said, and how he said it. (Possibly where, too.) And you compounding Rep. Davis' mistake doesn't exactly help, guy.
April 14, 2008 5:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
In a related development, Rep. Davis was heard to sing, "that boy/ isn't good for you/ though he may want you too/ this boy/ wants you back again." He has since apologized to the estate of John Lennon and to the two surviving Beatles.
April 14, 2008 4:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Honestly, I expect he's probably relieved people are down on him about the "boy" and not about his making marble-mouthed unverifiable (by defintion) allegations about a "highly classified" thingamajigee. Did Dick Cheney use his special Fourth Branch superpowers to grant this yahoo a license to leak?
April 14, 2008 5:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
The apology appears sincere, so I would suggest that Obama accept it. It would be easy to flood the airways with our outrage about the "boy" usage, but Obama can show himself to be the bigger person. I'd advise him to meet with Davis and personally accept his apology.
April 14, 2008 5:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is always Obama's just to be the bigger person while people smear him and flood the airwaves with garbage like this "bitter-gate" manufactured controversy.
It would be nice if Clinton, McCain and the rest of his republican scum buddies were held to such a high standard.
April 14, 2008 5:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is he also apologizing for, and explaining what he mean by "finger on the trigger"? Is Mr. Davis afraid that Senator Obama will not be enough of a War Monger for his taste?
April 14, 2008 5:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not only that, but he should demand an apology for SENATOR CLINTON from Mitch McConnell for that crass Hooters remark. Talk about taking the high road.
April 14, 2008 5:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
F this A hole's apology. He knew exactly what he was saying and exactly what the implications were and that's exactly what he wanted floating out there. Then he apologizes so the statement can be repeated again and again. Some of you might wallow in the haze of "i'm sure he's a good man" and "god bless america" and all the rest of that crap. But i've seen this crap for too long and i know what it is when i see it and it's racist to the core just like he is. From a PC point of view I would publicly accept his apology. But i tell you what, if it were me I would not forget it. People like him need to be weeded OUT OF PUBLIC OFFICE. And I'd use every legal means to do just that. Until we call these racist A holes for what they are and until everyone stands up and says NO MORE, this country is going to remain the racist self imploding country that it is.
April 15, 2008 1:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
LOLOLOLOLOL!!!!
These are the Republicans that everyone is running around with their hair on fire screaming about. The Republicans are coming!
Good.
If this is a preview, this and the "They have their Tiger Woods" comment, I think we can quit worrying.
LOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!
April 14, 2008 5:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're correct. I fail to see why everyone is so concerned about the Republicans and their so-called attack machine, and fears that Obama can't face them down. People act like he's a fawn in the woods, but I think he stands up for himself pretty well. Republicans can do foot-in-mouth pretty well.
April 14, 2008 5:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
My poor choice of words is regrettable and was in no way meant to impugn you
Of course it was!
April 14, 2008 5:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, though I do think that there are clear racial overtones in using "boy," it must be said that a lot Southerners use it in referring to both blacks and whites, in order to emphasize the point: "What are you smoking, boy?" is what my brother in law always says to his kids after they've done something particularly boneheaded.
I agree that he shouldn't have said it, but it's not always intended as a racist slur. It's more of an overall way of conveying disrespect.
April 14, 2008 6:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is that, by any chance, because his kids are -- umm, what's the word I'm looking for -- boys?
The thing that's insulting about "boy" is its application to an adult black man. The defense that the word is in common usage to refer to male children is no more a defense than it would be to point out that female dogs are called bitches so it's ok to call Hillary that too.
April 14, 2008 8:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry, Davis, but I don't believe you.
I know Hillary supporters will say. "See? See? No way he can get elected. People are racist."
Yes, and some people are sexist, too. But that won't stop either Obama or Hillary from beating pro-war, pro-Bush, pro-rich white people McCain.
April 14, 2008 5:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
The people of this country don't care about racism...only about the highly offensive word "bitter".
April 14, 2008 5:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
The people of this country don't care about racism....only the highly offensive word "bitter"
Nailed it! I bet we get any number of talking hairdoes who say "Hey, he misspoke, he apologized, he didn't mean it" when discussing Davis' use of a historical abomination to refer to a black man.
Barack Obama points out that people in small towns are angry about the way their lives have turned out?
OMG!!!!!!!!!!OMG!!!!!!!!!!!STOP EVERYTHING AND HAVE WALL TO WALL COVERAGE OVER BITTERGATE!!!
April 14, 2008 5:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
From the Obama campaign:
Meanwhile, Phil Singer had this to say:
"It's hard to gell what is more outrageous -- that after months, MONTHS, Obama finally gives us something to work with, just in time to squash Bill's excellent Bosnia comments, or the fact that some &^%$$&two-bit Republican dickhead has to go and change the subject. Can't we get some love here, people?"
Seriously. What a bind. They could make hay out of McConnell's disgusting remarks, but everytime they did, Davis' BOY comment would come back...
April 14, 2008 5:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
you know what Obama should do (or what I would do)
he should publically accept the apology and say "hey I understand saying something we don't necessarily mean, but seeing how it could be taken a certain way"
it would make it hard for GOP to attack him for how he said something but forgive their guy for how he said something >_
but thats just me
April 14, 2008 5:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'd love to see the two presidential candidates left standing both have "gaffes" resulting from poor word choice and then, together, declare a truce on the whole stupid practice of parsing every word out of politicians' mouths for talk show fodder.
Yeah, I don't see it happening either.
April 14, 2008 5:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Word.
To hear some of the Hillary supporters tell it, this country is wall to wall Klan.
And apparently that's Carville's view, since he's the one who famously said that Pennsylvania is Philadelphia and Pittsburgh and the rest is Alabama.
And that's not condescending to Pennsylvanians? I'd find that insulting, myself.
April 14, 2008 5:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Once again race becomes an issue in the campaign with a southern Republican having to grovel for a racially insensitive remark. But it's probably no big deal. Jeremiah Wright just called Thomas Jefferson a pedophile a few days ago, and so far there's been almost no mention of it - except on Fox News, of course.
April 14, 2008 5:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, We know how much it hurts you, Goose Steeping Otto, to see one of your fellow hate mongers, get exposed.
Nice and cozy, is it, in your Aryan Nation Compound!!
April 14, 2008 5:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
While I don't believe that the word "boy" always has some intended racial undertone in its usage, I'm still glad this controversy keeps the media from talking about the "bitter" nonsense for at least a minute or two. Sometimes the MSM's ADD can be helpful.
April 14, 2008 5:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good luck with your wishful thinking! Yes, the media will treat Davis' comment really really seriously!
April 14, 2008 5:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thomas Jefferson a pedophile?
Where is the outrage?
Wow.
April 14, 2008 5:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Link, please.
Also, bear in mind that Wright's no longer Obama's preacher.
April 14, 2008 5:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe he misspoke - he meant to say Jefferson slept with his slaves, not children.
April 14, 2008 5:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
haha, do you really give a shit what someone says about Thomas Jefferson?
April 14, 2008 5:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
I was going to say I read his remarks as being more ageist than racist, but then I saw he's only Barack's elder by 3 years. Still don't know I'd call it racist, but it was definitely intended to demean.
His apology does seem sincere though, so he gets a pass.
April 14, 2008 5:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
it's racist.
"Boy" has been used as a derogatory term against African-American boys for a long time in the south.
"You'd better watch out, boy."
And, judging by the apology letter by Geoff Davis, he knows it.
April 14, 2008 5:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
True, the immediate apology does clear up my doubts on the intent.
April 14, 2008 5:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
It shouldn't. He's a politician; he had to apologize. Who knows if they're two ordinary citizens what Davis would've done.
April 14, 2008 5:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
ack, what a horrible typo.
Of course, I meant "African American male" not just boy.
the fact that Obama is a grown man makes it an obvious racial slur.
April 14, 2008 5:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, if you don't know if it's racist just be really careful if you call an adult male African American "boy".
I hope your reflexes are good.
April 14, 2008 8:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Eh, kay. A story of a non-issue that I hadn't heard about has been resolved. Nice. What's next?
April 14, 2008 5:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Excuse me but when you say: "That boy's finger does not need to be on the button," about an African American, you are going to have one hell of a time convincing me that you just condescended on the basis of his age.
I'm not that dumb - I grew up in Texas. Like I haven't already heard every single racist code word, excuse, justification already?
I grew up with it. I know it when I sees it.
April 14, 2008 5:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think "boy" is even a code word. I think it has deep racist undertones.
April 14, 2008 5:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
News Flash:
Wright is old news. No one cares anymore.
You people are living in the past, where people might remember something a few days later.
Not now. Clinton can support the war up until 2006, saying that setting a withdrawal date would be giving in to the terrorists, but does any Hillary supporter remember?
Look, Hate Wright all you want. He's not going to cost Obama either the nomination or the general election, and repeating his quotes just makes you look desperate.
April 14, 2008 5:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Change "that boy's" to "Barack Obama's finger does not need to be on the button" and it sounds fine.
McConnell is correct with regard to Obama: "I fear the two Democrats, one in particular, is incredibly naive," McConnell said, adding that five years ago when the U.S. Senate voted to go to war in Iraq, Obama was in the Illinois state senate. "This is the big leagues now. At what point do you turn off the demagoguery and become a serious, responsible leader?"
Obama...responsible...never.
April 14, 2008 5:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Change "that boy's" to "Barack Obama's finger does not need to be on the button" and it sounds fine.
Ummm, no shit. But he didn't say "Barack Obama" he said "boy."
April 14, 2008 5:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
In other words, if you take out the insulting part, it's fine.
April 14, 2008 5:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree, the boy comment is inappropriate. It's the possibility of Obama as POTUS that is frightening.
April 14, 2008 5:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, better ready yourself.
April 14, 2008 5:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
If McCain doesn't pick a right wing loonie, McCain wins. With either Romney, Giuliani or Rice as VP choice, McCain wins in a walk.
April 14, 2008 5:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, I think McCain HAS to nominate a right winger to WIN.
Democrats are fired up this year. McCain needs a winger to GOTV.
Of course, if he nominates a winger, he loses the moderates (which he will anyway, once his record starts coming out).
I can't WAIT for the General. This one is going to be fun!
April 14, 2008 5:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Romney, Giuliani or Rice aren't right-wing loonies?
April 14, 2008 6:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not to the majority of Americans. In the liberal (nothing wrong with the ideology) or so called progressive blog world, I assume they likely will be considered too conservative. However, the influence of cable news and talk radio is far greater than all blogs (right and left) combined.
Romney is a fraud, he's far more liberal than he shows and could be a good manager, Giuliani is a little bit of a dictator but how many GOP types have had gay roommates? Rice is too much of an academic for me but is far more qualified than Obama.
April 14, 2008 6:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
No doubt Rudy and Romney have liberal pasts. But both moved so insanely to the right during the primary that I'd call them right-wing nuts now.
As far as Rice is concerned, I think she's far too attached to the Bush administration (and the Iraq war) to help McCain at all.
April 14, 2008 6:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sure, sure, sounds reasonable, if McCain doesn't pick a right wing loon he wi..., wait a minute,
Giuliani? omg man, we can take the RNC shill routine, and throwing in Rice to deflect those who may allude to your previous (how shall we saw) "colored" postings... but 911iani????
Come on man, just because Rush and Hannity and Coulter SAY liberials is stupid 'tards does not make it so...
911iani, HAHAHA awesome VP for the the 72 year old candidate (who would become THE oldest president elect if he won), hey here's one, did you hear the one about Dick Cheney being McCains VP?
April 14, 2008 6:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, both comments are wrong.
And frankly, both are racist.
Obama is a smart man whom I trust as Commander-in-Chief.
This whole CIC threshold is bunk. I don't think 8 years being a First Lady qualifies you to be CIC, any more than being tortured as a POW qualifies you.
Judgement is what counts, and out of all three candidates, Obama has the best Judgement hands down.
April 14, 2008 5:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
MP is a racist, too.
Imagine that!
I don't think even Buchanan will defend this one, MP, sorry!
(I like your new avatar, BTW. Good to see Republicans using the old "Liberals are Commies" routine. Guess we'll find out how well that works this year....)
April 14, 2008 5:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Marginal Player is an ANT
ANT(Aryan Nation Troll)
April 14, 2008 5:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Judging by the quick apology, I'm guessing Davis decided against the "Mad Libs" defense.
April 14, 2008 5:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
uh, wha?
Pop quiz there middlename, what is Hillary's middle name?
Also M.P., if you change the negro in Strom Thurmond's "not enough troops in the army to force the southern people to admit negros..."
to: "not enough troops in the army to force the southern people to admit other folks with whom we take exception for cultural and political reasons even though we don't deny their humanity..."
It doesn't sound that bad either, well, maybe it does ;-)
April 14, 2008 6:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Um. Rodham. Remember, she married Bill?
April 14, 2008 10:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well I hope Geoff Davis's comment gets as examined as this ridiculous Bittergate kerfluffle has been. Now that is truly outrageous.
April 14, 2008 5:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
So Obama uses a admittedly poor choice of words and this clown jumps all over it was perverse glee, however now the show is on the other foot, it was an innocent "misspeak" and nothing more.
Interesting.
April 14, 2008 5:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
O it does - I didn't mean to suggest otherwise. Down here, calling an African American male a "boy" like that can get you killed, just about.
It's a very deep insult.
April 14, 2008 5:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Reverent Wright said that Thomas Jefferson had fathered a child by a fifteen year old slave girl.
That is true. Her name was Sally Hemmings. Jefferson did sexually assault an underage girl, while he held her in bondage. He fathered more children after that with the same girl.
When an Adult Male holds an underage girl in complete captivity, and sexually assaults her over and over, and never acknowledges his crimes, what would you call the perpetrator of such evil acts!
April 14, 2008 5:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Get used to it GOP. That type of slip is going to be dime and dozen once the general campaign starts.
April 14, 2008 5:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just read the whole link.
Boy, these Republican dinners sound like a great place to go in with a hidden camera:
Quote:
As for Obama's Democratic rival, McConnell said U.S. Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York seems to be "teetering on the brink."
"I hear she hasn't been this worried since a new Hooters opened" near her home with former President Bill Clinton, McConnell said, prompting laughs from the 400 Northern Kentucky Republicans.
April 14, 2008 5:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ugh, what a lame joke. Who is writing his material, Jay Leno?
April 14, 2008 5:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow, that is Jay Leno bad. Did he work in an OJ joke too?
April 14, 2008 5:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Suspicions confirmed (thanks, Google):
"In just two weeks, Bill Clinton will no longer be President of the United States. He'll just be another chubby, middle-aged guy annoying the waitresses at Hooters." —Jay Leno
"Former President Bill Clinton has over $10 million in his pockets. $10 million! Has there ever been a better time to be a Hooters waitress?" —Jay Leno
Also:
"Yesterday, on a campaign trip, Hillary Clinton suggested that she knows how to deal with evil and bad men, like Osama bin Laden, because she had to put up with her husband. Which explains why Hillary wants to look for bin Laden at the nearest Hooters." --Conan O'Brien
April 14, 2008 5:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
good to see joke writers are paid well....
April 14, 2008 5:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
And: today an AP reporter, while asking Senator Obama a question, said this:
"Can you imagine shifting a substantial number of Afghanistan -- a substantial number to Afghanistan where the Taliban has been gaining strength and Obama Bin Laden is still at large?"
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/04/obama-corrects.html
April 14, 2008 5:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Strange but true. Today it was announced that Rupert Murdoch has been appointed to the AP board of directors.
No soon does Murdoch join AP, than they start smearing Senator Obama.
It sure did not take that Old Aussie Snake long to Fox up AP.
April 14, 2008 5:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Can you remind me how Hillary's record on the war suggests responsible leadership? Or any other hawk, for that matter? And then can you go climb back into your bunker?
April 14, 2008 5:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
A great big thank you! Goes out to Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton. One for gutting Fairness Doctrine, the other for not only not bringing it back, but deep sixing it further while he also puts what remains of the Anti-Trust div. of the DOJ out of its "misery."
I don't want any more steeenking Clintons in the White House.
April 14, 2008 5:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
More Obama elitism:
Obama's "punished with a baby" comment sparks protests
Christian leaders in the U.S. are demanding that Sen. Barack Obama apologize for comments he made referring to babies as a “punishment”.
While addressing a campaign rally in Pennsylvania last weekend, Sen. Obama said, "When it comes specifically to HIV/AIDS, the most important prevention is education, which should include -- which should include abstinence education and teaching the children -- teaching children, you know, that sex is not something casual," he said.
"But it should also include -- it should also include other, you know, information about contraception because, look, I've got two daughters. 9 years old and 6 years old," he added.
"I am going to teach them first of all about values and morals. But if they make a mistake, I don't want them punished with a baby," Obama said.
The Christian Defense Coalition responded to Obama by saying that his comment is “not only a slap in the face to every child born to a young mother, but it diminishes the great joy that children bring to their families regardless of the circumstances in which they were born.”
Rev. Patrick J. Mahoney, Director of the Christian Defense Coalition, also commented on Obama’s campaign for change, saying, "Senator Obama talks about bringing change to America. However, when it comes to his policies on abortion he is strictly 'old school.' Every recent poll shows that America's emerging generation is embracing a culture of life and desires and end to the violence that has resulted in the deaths of over 50,000,000 innocent children and wounded so many women.”
http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=12231
April 14, 2008 5:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
If you actually think stuff like this helps win people over to your side, I have a solar-powered flashlight...well, you know.
April 14, 2008 5:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
He explained this last night on the Compassion Forum.
He said to a young girl, (around age 13) it would be punishment. It would be dangerous to them, and dangerous to the baby.
He also said that the best ways to prevent abortion are through sex ed, but in the end, it always should be a choice.
Please tell me what part of that you disagree with.
April 14, 2008 6:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rev. Patrick J. Mahoney, Director of the Christian Defense Coalition, also commented on Obama’s campaign for change, saying, "Senator Obama talks about bringing change to America. However, when it comes to his policies on abortion he is strictly 'old school.' Every recent poll shows that America's emerging generation is embracing a culture of life and desires and end to the violence that has resulted in the deaths of over 50,000,000 innocent children and wounded so many women.”
http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=12231
Posted by Marginal Player
April 14, 2008 5:55 PM |As an Irishman, I want you to relay this message from me to Father Mahoney.
Father,
When you creeps put up your own house in order and stop sexually molesting little boys, and decide to actually father some children with actually women, then I will hear you out.
I got news for you Father. If God wanted you to stay celibate he would not have created you with a penis and a pair of testicles, and if God wanted you to diddle little boys, he would have given them vaginas.
Right to life my arse. F off you pedophile enabling bunch of sexual freaks.
April 14, 2008 7:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Geoff, is this your hood?
April 14, 2008 6:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
With respect to the comments of Davis to the extent that racism is involved, which it is, this is not the problem. In large part Davis and McConnell remarks were juvenile, remember Allen's remarks in Virginia. It was not the "macaca" that doomed Allen, it was the pattern over time, and his lack of political strength. Obama did win the Virginia primary as I recall.
By design such remarks are intended to detract from substantive issues; this is the real danger. Individuals who are attracted by this type of remark are not disposed to Obama, and their lost will not be missed.
In sum it is best to stay on message and move on!
April 14, 2008 6:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
**They INTEND to apologize. Just as soon as they get back from the Senior Prom.
April 14, 2008 6:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
April 14, 2008 6:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have been screwing up my tags all day long.
Damn.
April 14, 2008 6:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
I haven't seen nor heard anything yet from Obama on the "that boy" remark, so let me predict his response: He'll be gracious, accept Davis' apology, maybe even add a little self-deprecating quip, and that's the last we'll hear of it.
That's the beauty of this man. He thinks, acts, and talks like an adult. I am so happy that he will be our next president.
April 14, 2008 6:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
if the pointy hat fits your pointy head, apologies ain't fooling anybody
April 14, 2008 6:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree so much!
I also recommend the blog post on Carl Bernstein's view of a Hillary Clinton presidency, on TPM cafe.
It's a fascinating read.
April 14, 2008 6:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Does anyone find it ironic that a southern politician with the same name (almost) as the only president of the Confederacy made this comment?
I don't.
April 14, 2008 6:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
We just have to keep in mind that few statements coming out of Kentucky have any teeth.
April 14, 2008 7:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just as a general note, it never really helps to respond to hate speech with hate speech. As someone who grew up in Kentucky, surrounded by poverty and prejudice, I was shocked as a young person when I would visit my more "enlightened" friends in the "liberal" north only to have people ask me questions about whether my relatives wore shoes. The stereotypes about Kentuckians (and more generally, Southerners or Appalachians) may contain a degree of truth, as any stereotypes might. But they are not helpful in building political alliances.
I say this in the unpleasant glow of Obama's recently misconstrued "bitter" comments - with which I completely agree, despite the delivery. The reason that his words have been so easy to take out of context and to work against him and Dems generally is because of statements like yours.
Many, many people in Kentucky have been working for years to oust Mitch McConnell (as the worst example) - and many of us expat KYs are still committed years after leaving the state. But we've had precious little to offer as an alternative to the "God, guns, and gays" narrative, in part because the language which has framed the Democratic agenda has written off "red states" as below contempt.
Yes, Geoff Davis made a racist remark. It was disgusting, and he needed to be held to count for it. I think politicians and other public figures (including, especially, talking heads and bloviators) should be loudly, publicly called out for anything approaching hate speech, because I think we need to collectively set the terms for our public discourse. But in doing so, we also need to model the type of discourse that we wish to engage.
Disparaging Kentuckians on the whole for the remarks of one racist is *not* going to raise the level of discourse on race. It's not going to prevent further hate speech. From a political standpoint, it's not going to lead any Kentuckian to a more progressive view on race-related issues, nor convert a single voter to a candidate who might replace a race-baiter. Most importantly, substituting one kind of stereotyping for another is not going to help bridge the cultural chasm from which comments like Davis's spring.
Racism is a useful tool for promoting a politics of division. Regionalism is, too.
April 14, 2008 9:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
"That Boy" sounds like a nightmare nifty fifties TV sitcom about a conservative white Kentucky congressman always getting in a pickle trying to keep up with the zany hijinx of his black man servant.
April 14, 2008 7:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Alligators in my bathroom?! Le-royyyyy!"
*Leroy looks at camera, smiles impishly*
"Who, me?"
April 14, 2008 7:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, the Congressman was misquoted. He referred to Sen. Obama as "that THERE boy", and accordingly has sent a letter of apology to Strunk and White.
April 14, 2008 7:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
I know the Congressman and Barack Obama should accept his apology so we can move on and leave this sorry episode behind!
http://osi-speaks.blogspot.com/2008/04/congressman-geoff-davis-is-class-act.html#links
April 14, 2008 7:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nasty comment to follow: That old man's finger is what shouldn't be on the button. McCain has demonstrated in numerous ways, from his votes in congress, to his bio tour all about being a Navy brat (wait, is he not 70 years old and has spent the has been a Senator in the US Congress for the most recent 20 years?) to his answers to voters' questions that he is all about war. If any of the current candidates is impulsive and self-righteous enough to drop a nuclear bomb, it's McCain.
April 14, 2008 9:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Umm, no, because they are grown up now. He says the same thing to his brothers. They all talk to each other like that. They affect the strongest southern accent they can and say things like, "boy, what in tarnation do you think you're doing!"
It's okay among family members, but the genesis of the term is racial, even if a specific use is not. Just trying to provide some context.
April 14, 2008 10:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
hahaha! so amusing.
Yeah, as I said once, it's not just a term the "genesis of which is racial", it is the kind of insult that can get you killed. It is simply one of the most deeply insulting things you can say to or about an adult African American male..
April 14, 2008 10:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
If Davis was really old it might be explainable that he would call a Senator "boy," but he doesn't look to be much older than Obama. Reminds me that Johnson called Kennedy "boy" to his face just to put him down--before JFK was elected president and he had to call him Mr. President.
April 14, 2008 11:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Racists have always used the term "boy" to address adult black males in a servile role, waiters, drivers, gardeners, etc., the French equivalent of "garcon" for a waiter in the old days when the society was class-conscious. This is not age-related, and similar to the "macaca" remark.
April 15, 2008 12:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is ASTONISHINGLY RACIST!!!!
Anyone who DOESN'T think this is racist might as well hang a sign around their heads saying "I'm a racist." It's subtler but almost worse than the n-word.
If I called a black man "boy" he and any black people around would beat me to a pulp or worse.
I went to the NYT site and was almost as surprised that it wasn't a major news story.
ALSO: REMINDER, AP Chairman Singleton is a HUGE Bush fan and drinking buddy. The guy is a slimeball, defines "corporate media". Don't think for a second it was "accidental".
April 15, 2008 1:39 AM | Reply | Permalink