Poll: Obama Catching Up With Hillary In Pennsylvania
A new Quinnipiac poll shows that Obama has cut into Hillary's lead in Pennsylvania, where she needs a decisive, if not overwhelming, win to keep her presidential hopes alive.
She leads Obama by six points, 50%-44%, down three points from only last week.
The shift is driven partly by Obama's showing among key swing constituencies -- whites, voters from the Philadelphia suburbs, and women -- 41% of whom now back Obama, up from 37% last week. Other Q-poll numbers:
*White voters for Clinton 56 -- 38 percent, down from 59 -- 34 percent last week.*Black voters back Obama 75 -- 17 percent, compared to 73 -- 11 percent.
*Men are for Obama 48 -- 44 percent, compared to a 46 -- 46 percent tie last week.
*Voters under 45 go with Obama 55 -- 40, while older voters back Clinton 55 -- 38 percent.
As I reported here recently, Obama told a group of California donors that if he were to come within 10 points of Hillary in the state, he'd call it a victory.
If he manages to keep it as close as today's survey, it will make it that much tougher for Hillary to make the case to super-delegates that she still has any kind of reasonable shot at closing the gap with Obama.















GOTV operation will make all the difference...
April 8, 2008 7:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Link:
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1165
April 8, 2008 7:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Interesting numbers when it comes to race:
"Pennsylvania Democrats approve 65 - 23 percent of the way Obama is handling race issues in the campaign, with white voters approving 62 - 25 percent and black voters approving 80 - 14 percent.
Voters approve 56 - 28 percent of the way Clinton is handling race issues, with white approval at 60 - 24 percent and black approval at a negative 35 - 48 percent."
April 8, 2008 7:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
If you believe the Quinnipiac polls, Obama has been cutting into HRC's lead at the rate of 3pts per week. With 2 weeks left to PA, if that were to continue, that would make PA dead even on election day.
So yeah, the GOTV will be key and whoever has the turnout wins.
April 8, 2008 7:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
IF being the key word, I think. Remember New Hampshire. And Ohio. Pennsylvania's not going to be over till it's over.
April 8, 2008 8:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
The most significant number in this poll is 6% undecided.
This is down from 9-12% in recent weeks during which Hillary's lead has been slipping. Earlier, when Hillary held a big lead in Pennsylvania, the undecided was only 5-6%. Then it doubled to 9-12%.
If this Q poll portends the future, it suggests that voters who were leaving Hillary are beginning to coalesce around Obama. The previously higher undecided numbers suggested that were wavering & still making up their minds. The important part of this was that they could still come back to Hillary on election day. If the Q poll holds up, it would appear that she has lost them.
The other significant piece that reinforces this thesis is that for the first time Obama is polling above 45%. Even when Hillary's lead was slipping, Obama was not rising. She was simply dropping. He has been consistently in the 41-45% range in the past month. (Of course, he was lower than that earlier when her leads in PA were ridiculously high.) Now it appears that he has a solid base of support in the state.
Hillary is in real trouble. If this continues, it could all be over in 2 weeks.
April 8, 2008 8:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Spine of Steel
April 8, 2008 8:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary began with a 20% lead. She won't have the luxury of cushions like that in the GE. If Obama finishes within 5% Hillary MUST drop out. Anything within 10% should be considered a victory for Obama considering the fact that he started way behind and nearly all of the PA Dem establishment lined up behind Hillary.
April 8, 2008 8:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm with you, but she finishes ahead by 1% and the confetti will be dropped. Shit, Nutter and Rendell might throw a victory parade down Broad Street.
April 8, 2008 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
As the news that she has no realistic chance to get the nomination begins to be discussed openly in the MSM and trickle down into the consciousness of primary voters, the soft component of her support is starting to collapse, and the undecideds will not break for her.
April 8, 2008 8:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, yeah, but every previous time that's been said, voters started to feel sorry for her and move back in her direction. So careful what you wish for, right? ^_^
April 8, 2008 8:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
In N.H., there was much of a sympathy vote, but this preceded people learning of her pitiful campaign management skills and of her candidness challenges. The good thing about a long primary is that the lower information voters become less so over time.
April 8, 2008 9:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Newsflash: She has had no reasonable shot at closing the gap with Obama for several weeks now. I'm not sure why, given your proximity to the spin machine that is the Clinton campaign, you believe that a closer than expected win would suddenly cause them to view reality any different than they have now.
The media has saved them. Whatever you think of the proportional system it has worked against her efforts to close the gap and to Obama's favor. This thing is OVER.
April 8, 2008 8:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
Seems further proof of what I consider a good axiom about the campaign -- the more voters know of Obama, the more they like him and the more voters know of Hillary, the less they like her.
I'm guessing that this poll does not yet reflect the fallout from Mark Penn's betrayal of Hillary's blue collar supporters by scheming with the Colombian ambassador about how to ram through a trade agreement with a country that murders union leaders -- and from Hillary's failure to sever all ties to this unprincipled, unethical scumbag.
Perhaps once this pathetic episode resonates with the voters, we will see this headline: Penn Swings Penn. to Obama.
April 8, 2008 8:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
The latest SUSA poll has Clinton up by 18 points.Go Hillary !
April 8, 2008 8:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
You're whistling in the dark. Your numbers are from six days ago. Today, SUSA has Clinton 53% Obama 41%. That is 12, not 18 points. Percentage wise, that is a 33% decline in support for Clinton in six days. That shows her support is kinda mushy.
Clinton dropped 6 points in the past week alone. Other surveys are closer, so SUSA may be the outlier here.
What is undeniable is a trend to Obama that is more than a trickle. It may be a surge if it keeps up. And the SUSA numbers probably do not reflect the Mark Penn mess either.
April 8, 2008 9:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Go to the SUSA site and check again.Hard luck brother !
April 8, 2008 9:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Raj: sorry to disillusion you but here is a pie-graphic from 4/1, SUSA's latest in PA. Clinton ahead by only 12.
SUSA is behind the curve, a week behind the others. When they measure the Mark Penn effect, it is going to be another dip for Hillary.
http://tinyurl.com/3pfmt2
April 8, 2008 9:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Suntzu:
In fact, Obama is trailing by 18 points according to the latest SurveyUSA poll.
http://www.nbc10.com/politics/15821754/detail.html
Following the sequence of events in the last week there are very few reasons, if any, to believe Obama is loosing ground in PA.
SurveyUSA has the best track record this season, but could thi be a out lier?
A 6 point negative swing in the week is baffling.
April 8, 2008 10:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Interesting poll results and further proof that the momentum is with Obama, but does anyone really believe that HRC gained among black voters since last week? I don't.
April 8, 2008 9:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bob Herbert of the Times this morning, interviews people in blue-collar district of PA. Straws in the wind favorable for Dems.
Hint: they don't care for Bush and by extension, ain't crazy for McCain either.
April 8, 2008 9:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
As an Obama supporter, I'd be extremely pleased if he managed to pull off the upset, but with slick Eddie Rendell and most of the PA democratic machine behind HRC, I'd have to give her a built in 5 point cushion.
April 8, 2008 9:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
DEMOCRATS: MANAGE YOURSELVES!
Democrats who want to win the general election have to hope that Pennsylvania voters will give Obama a victory or a very near miss, so that the party can coalesce around his candidacy and we can get on with it. Superelegates need to do their job: make timely decisions for the good of the party, and stop looking over their shoulders timidly.
Heading toward November, it is going to be tough going against McCain no matter what, and the longer the Clinton exercise in tactical self-preservation lingers, the weaker our chances, because we Democrats cannot shape definitions of McCain in the early months as long as we are bickering internally. Democratic gains across the board will be weaker if we continue to show ourselves mired in policy-free race and gender wars. Many voters will conclude we cannot run our own affairs (just as HRC clearly could not effectively manage her own campaign).
I have nothing against HRC herself. She might well have been a strong candidate if she had liberated herself from Penn and her husband and managed an effective and more authentic campaign. But she did not -- that water is long under the bridge. This has been effectively over for her for a long time. We Democrats need to move on.
Theda Skocpol, Cambridge MA
April 8, 2008 9:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
"She might well have been a strong candidate if she had liberated herself from Penn and her husband and managed an effective and more authentic campaign. But she did not -- that water is long under the bridge. This has been effectively over for her for a long time. We Democrats need to move on."
Beautifully put. I hope your message is spread far and wide.
April 8, 2008 9:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm pretty proud of Hillary for having any lead at all considering how much she is being out spent. When you consider that Obamba is out spending her by a mulitiple of two or three, and then you throw in the SEIU money, I think she must be running a very effective campaign to be ahead by 5 or 6 points.
Also, if Obama and his supporters are already spending that much money, and don't have the lead, I don't think they're going to.
My prediction: Obama closes the gap to 3 or 4 points in the polls that come out the early part of next week. Then, around thursday or Friday of next week, Hillary comes out with another 3 a.m. add, and wins on the 22nd by 12 points going away.
I don't think she needs to win by double digits, but I think she will anyway.
April 8, 2008 9:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wow, sis! Do the HRC people email you the talking points or did you get it from their website? Every Clinton surrogate has been saying the exact same thing over the last week. How about an original thought? AND she needs to win by 20+ if she wants to have any hope at catching him. 12 just won't do it.
April 8, 2008 9:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
You're ignoring that outside of Bob Casey, Hillary has the entire Democratic establishment behind her: the governor, state party chair, mayors of both major cities, etc...
You can't pretend that Hillary didn't have a huge advantage going into PA. The fact that Obama is closing the gap, according to every poll, is impressive.
April 8, 2008 9:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Also, you don't think she needs to win by double digits.
So, I have to ask: what, exactly, will a single digit win (after being up by as many as 20pts) accomplish for her?
April 8, 2008 9:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Penn is no longer in that role; the 3 a.m. ads have gone the way of the dodo, at least as far as attacking Obama. Try again.
April 8, 2008 12:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
First, Hillary has not engaged in her last-minute smear campaign yet. Second, the demos in PA are hugely against Obama (compared to HRC). I don't care how much tightening there is in the polls, I agree with Al from The Field -- we'll be very lucky to keep the margin to 10. It's more likely a 15-of loss.
April 8, 2008 9:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
The 3 am ad didn't work in Texas. And it didn't even run in OH. Typical Clinton-supporter lack of contact with reality.
April 8, 2008 9:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Right! We forgot. Pennsylvania won't count because Obama outspent her. What were we thinking?
April 8, 2008 9:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Rajesh - I just checked SUSA's web site, and it's 12%. Their latest PA poll is from 4/1 - here's the link: http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReportPopup.aspx?g=c33bbc21-2d16-4747-ae93-214709784559&q=45558
If they have a more recent poll, please provide the link...
April 8, 2008 9:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
If you don't believe me please go to the following link:
http://www.nbc10.com/politics/15821754/detail.html
April 8, 2008 9:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Such breathless reporting of polls! Quinnipiac surprises me though. THe main thing about this poll is that it shows hardly any movement. Hillary's bottom line number is unchanged. Obama's "movement" relative to the last poll is barely outside the margin of error.
Look at this, for example:
"In this latest survey, one of the biggest shifts is among women who went from 54 - 37 percent for Clinton April 2 to 54 - 41 percent for her today. "
Okay so Clinton's support among women held firm at 54%. Obama had a slight spike outside the 2.7% margin of error. and that's "one of the biggest shifts"
That means the other shifts are mostly even smaller.
"A look at other groups shows:
White voters for Clinton 56 - 38 percent, down from 59 - 34 percent last week."
So Clinton's "decline" among White voters is equal to the margin of error. And Obama's growth is barely outside the margin of error.
Among Blacks, Clinton has the largest increase outside the margin of error than on any other measure, it seems. She went from 11% to 17%. Obama's growth among blacks was lower than the margin of error.
"Black voters back Obama 75 - 17 percent, compared to 73 - 11 percent."
Men hardly moved. a tick up within the margin for Obama and a tick down within the margin for CLinton;
"Men are for Obama 48 - 44 percent, compared to a 46 - 46 percent tie last week."
If I were reporting on this poll, I'd say it should a basically stable race, from the previous poll to the present one.
Who knows what can happen in the future. But to take these numbers as an indicator of a dynamical change in the race seems, well, silly.
Surprises me that the guys from Quinnipiac phrase things as they did.
April 8, 2008 9:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary will pull some last minute stuff--maybe victim card, attack ads, race card, who knows what else--and Pennsylvania voters, who are already sympathetic to her message (old, white), will be swayed.
If you are an Obama supporter, please please please don't participate in this goalposting.
The simple fact is that, if Obama gets within ten points, he will have seriously dented her lead, and proven he can compete anywhere.
If he can get within ten of Clintons in Penn, then he can make a dent in red states against McCain.
It's not about winning. It's about being competitive. So far so good, but please (as exciting as they are) don't fall for the polls and the new narratives.
April 8, 2008 9:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is great but I am still looking for a 10% win for Clinton in PA. She has a machine similar to the one that worked for her in NH. GOTV folks like Nick Clemons can do a lot with perspiration to counter the effects of a bad campaign. Clinton should own PA. Anything close to 10% remains a great showing for Obama.
April 8, 2008 10:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama is able to outspend Hillary because MORE individual donors believe in his message over hers, and MORE individual donors are donating MORE money to his campaign because of this. It is a simple equation: the effectiveness of the candidate's message is reflected in the number of donors and amount of donations to that candidate.
April 8, 2008 10:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
Clinton v. Obama in Penn. is the unmoving force against the object that can't stop anything. It's demographically probably the worst state in the union for Obama, and Clinton at this point is such a wounded candidate, with 90+% expectations of losing the nomination. I don't think it shows anything one way or the other regardless of the outcome, and it certainly won't change any math. If Clinton didn't quit before Penn., I don't see why she would quit after unless she somehow gets burried by a big margin, which is well nigh impossible.
The Political Groundhog predicts six more weeks of zzzzzzz.
April 8, 2008 10:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
TPM is getting the rep that its biased
AGAINST Clinton and joining other rabid Obama sites that used to have at least an appearance of unbiased reporting.
Too bad. Only in Obama's world like GWB world is a win a loss. Think about that for just a minute and get the gist of what playbook the Obama campaign is using.
The truth is, yes there is truth. This thing AINT over until each has gotten the *MAGIC NUMBER* 2025. AND NEITHER WILL. Being a constitutional lecturer 'professor', Obama should be leading on the issue of COUNTING ALL the votes. Yet, Obama doesn't advocate for revote in 2 states that are in voter limbo at present.
His numbers would skyrocket if he did, but in true form, he wants an Obama solution~to his benefit in Michigan (50-50 divy) as if its up to him. He AINT president yet! The arrogance of the man!!
The Obots are in full force on the internet, which translates into votes in the REAL world.
April 8, 2008 11:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
TPM's never had that rep, guy. If anything, I'd say the reverse is what they're accused of most often.
April 8, 2008 4:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm sorry Kash79, but you are linking to an old survey. Here is a link to the latest from the Survey USA site: http://www.surveyusa.com/index.php/2008/04/01/pennsylvania-obama-making-inroads/
April 8, 2008 11:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
While I wish you were right, you actually have it backwards. Kash's link takes you to this week's poll. Your link goes to last week's poll. It seems that SUSA's newest result really does show Sen Clinton gaining back lost ground.
April 8, 2008 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Does anybody have a geographic breakdown on the Q-poll sample? They probably know what they're doing, but Philly and its four suburban counties, accounting for 35% of the state's registered Dems, had significantly higher turnout in the last three cycles (thanks in part to Ed Rendell, ha, ha) than other counties. Philly alone has more than 40,000 new Dem voters this year. This is huge Obama territory, not only in demographics but in ground game. And nobody's looking to Michael Nutter to tell them what to do. So while reporters chase after retired miners in Altoona in search of Pennsylvania's political soul, I wonder how the pollsters are weighting things. Anybody know?
April 8, 2008 11:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Here's another story on the NBC10 site: http://www.nbc10.com/politics/15823073/detail.html
If you notice, it was updated this morning, so I think the 12-point difference is the correct number. Either way, Hillary will win Pa. and should do so handily. One thing to keep in mind is that in NH, Tx, and Ohio, Hillary won late deciders. It seems in Obama states, he cleans up in the end, but in Hillary states, she pulls ahead the last three days. Obama probably needs to be up 5 points in the last polls to win. Even if she wins by 1, she's not quitting.
April 8, 2008 12:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
This SUSA poll and related NBC online coverage is very confusing..even the article "posted" as referecned by JZ appears to really relate to the earlier poll versus the one SUSA did for its clients in PENN showing an 18 point lead for Clinton. Can ANYONE clarify this or is it just confusing reporting on the NBC website?
April 8, 2008 1:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nah, the worst state in the Union for Obama is West Virginia ... all Apalachia Hillbilly Rednecks, some which aren't afraid in the least to flaunt white supremacy beliefs.
April 8, 2008 2:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
As a former PA boy, I will tell you it is probably the most racist state north of the Mason-Dixon line. As a reporter for the Williamsport Sun-Gazette I covered the move of the Aryan Nation white supremacy group from the Idaho panhandle (just over the fence from me now) to Potter County in northern PA. I'm pulling for Obama, but there are a lot of old, racist white folks in upstate PA. GOTV Philly! We need you on this one.
April 8, 2008 3:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
We're working on it, brother...
April 8, 2008 4:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dang, I lost count of posters playing the race card but you are on the list.
Congrats.
April 14, 2008 3:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Unless Clinton pulls out a HUGE victory in PA (30%+), April 22 won't make much of a dent in Obama's delegate lead (and will be mostly cancelled out in NC immediately afterward). We all know it's going to be up to the superdelegates.
He outspent her in PA -- because of his phenomenal ability to raise money from grassroots donors. If you're a superD, does this point toward Obama or Clinton?
She couldn't hold on to her earlier 20-30% lead in the early PA polls -- as someone pointed out above, a this is a cushion the Dem candidate won't have in the GE. If you're a superD, does this point toward Obama or Clinton?
She says that small/red/purple/large-black-pop states don't matter (unless they are Ohio, in which case they matter a lot). You're a superD who wants to be re-elected, and wants other Dems to be elected, in your state. If you're from Texas or Kansas or Washington or Iowa or Illinois or Virginia or Georgia or Wyoming (or, well, anywhere but California, New York or PA), does this point you toward Obama or Clinton?
States she writes off as red, like Colorado, Wyoming and Texas, might be purple if Obama is the candidate. Does this point you toward Obama or Clinton?
His campaign registered huge numbers of new Democratic voters, including young and African-American voters -- and, unlike Kerry, actually got them to come to the polls -- even where caucuses made participation kind of a burdensome pain in the ass. (We can safely bet that Republican vote-suppression techniques will make voting an ordeal in low-income Latino/a and African-American precincts in swing states, as they did in 2000 and 2004.) Does this point you toward Obama or Clinton?
April 8, 2008 4:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Clinton by 30 embarrassing Snobama to drop out.
Lets get to crushing mcwar until he shows that famous temper.
April 14, 2008 2:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Keep your eyes on those polls because today is April 16th and it's Hillary who has been moving up with a fraction of the ad budget that the Obama Glitzkrieg is working with. Resist the Glitz!
April 16, 2008 6:08 AM | Reply | Permalink