You realize if she wins by 10%, she only picks up an additional ten delegates? That wouldn't be enough to overcome Obama's lead of 169 delegates.

Well well - I wonder if Adam Nagourney will retract his piece in the NYT that says "Obama has peaked."

See, this is why I hate these journalists - they all have their own agendas. We've watched Nagourney lie himself through the last 8 years and here he is, gearing up to lie some more.

So, Obama is outspending Clinton 3-to-1 and still trails and will still lose, very likely by double-digits. Isn't there a bigger message here? Even with money, Obama can't close the deal and cannot win. This will be no different elsewhere and especially no different in the general election. Obama cannot win, regardless of the fervor of his cult following or the money he and they throw at it. And consider too, that his failure is only against Clinton now. What happens if he faces McCain and the Republican 527s?

Mr. Murtha is right.

She will win by double digits.

THIS IS EXCELLENT NEWS!! FOR HILLARY!!!

Morning call? Who the hell is that? The poll is based on a very small sample any way.

Within ten points is victory for Obama. It shows he can compete anywhere, even a state incredibly stacked against him. He's almost there.

Inasmuch as he has continually narrowed the gap and hasn't lost ground like she has - I agree.

Hillary is losing the race nationally despite a huge financial advantage at the outset, with an equally insurmountable lead in the polls.

Now that she has only dropped something like 20 points since her peak, her supporters cast her as the David confronting the evil Goliath Obama. It's all the Hillary camp has, but it sure isn't much.

Actually, this poll might not be such good news for Clinton. Aside from the small sample, it was conducted over several days - from 3/27-4/02. It is very possible that she was pulling better numbers in the early part of the polling period as polls where data was collected more recently (PPD, Rasmussen, and Insider Advantage) show her leading by a range of 2-5%.

Time for people to Wake Up!
Obama constantly disrespects the Clinton Administration preferring the
transformative Reaganomics to the improvements with Clintonomics which created 22 million new jobs. It is a stretch to think this do-nothing
freshman Senator from Illinois can impute the character of one of the most successful Democratic presidents since FDR and get away with it with impunity. It is a new day and we don't have to give the black man a pass. Investigate. Obama referred to his white grandmother as a "typical white person." So what do you think the response would be if Hillary Clinton referred to a black person, any black person, or even Obama as a "typical" black person? Is this language of Barack Obama the change we can all believe in if he is the nominee?

I haven't heard Obama condemn his minister of 20 years for being antisemitic, have you? I haven't heard Obama say how he told his minister, who he considered an uncle, how inappropriate his views when they had one of their many private dinners together, have you?

I have heard Obama say he condemned Rezko for any crimes he may be guilty of, as-if he didn't know when many of Rezko's projects were only blocks away from Obama's office - and were taking place even as Obama interceded for Rezko in obtaining millions of dollars of tax payer money to finance the crime.

Why is the media NOT critical of Barack Obama like they are of Hillary Clinton? How does this guy get another pass? If anything should bring him down now it is his perfidy with regard to minister Wright and yet, the press which is riddled with white guilt is afraid to mention it - and the progressive blogosphere continues to drool over everything he says and does. Obama referred to his white grandmother as a "typical white person." So what do you think the response would be if Hillary Clinton referred to a black person, any black person, or even Obama as a "typical" black person? Is this language of Barack Obama the change we can all believe in if he is the nominee?

I haven't heard Obama condemn his minister of 20 years for being antisemitic, have you? I haven't heard Obama say how he told his minister, who he considered an uncle, how inappropriate his views when they had one of their many private dinners together, have you?
I have heard Obama say he condemned Rezko for any crimes he may be guilty of, as-if he didn't know when many of Rezko's projects were only blocks away from Obama's office - and were taking place even as Obama interceded for Rezko in obtaining millions of dollars of tax payer money to finance the crime.
This Rezco thing stinks to high heavan. Obama surely knew what Rev Wright was selling. What was it you Obama peopel did not like about the Clinton Years? Was it the Peace or the prosperity?

This "poll" had fewer than five hundred respondents polled over the course of an entire week, 3/27 - 4/2. Thus, it has a high margin of error and a long polling duration during a time lots of important stuff was happening.

My point is that the final numbers of this one are short on meaning if the question is "where is the race as of today." Arguing as if it were otherwise is silly.

The trendline from their last poll in February is, however, somewhat more meaningful.

People that instead do so simply are reflecting there own racism.

ROFLMAO.

Yeah, or they are honest enough to look at themselves and understand themselves and understand there is racism and anti-semitism and chauvinism inherent in this society and it imprints itself on every last one of us.

Anyone who rejects that is fooling themselves, Weaver.

AWWWWRIGHTTT!!!! She's dredging up the tears!!!! Gettin' weepy. Oooh, Hillary, you're so DEEP! Cry, baby, cry! That'll win you Pennsylvania for sure.

God, she's disgusting.

"That lead is down three points from mid-February. Since then, Obama barnstormed the state by bus and unleashed a Pennsylvania ad blitz, which the Call estimates is costing the Obama campaign $325,000 per day, as compared to Hillary's $120,000 per day."

More unbiased reporting from Mr. Unbiased. Greg: you're on to something, I think. Obama is trying to BUY the nomination!!!! THAT'S WHY HE'S SPENDING SO MUCH MORE THAN HILLARY!!! This whole "meme" about how he's raising more cash because he has a more invigorated base is just nonsense. This is a clear attempt by Obama to buy his way into the White House. There's probably billions of dollars in corporate Muslim hate-monger money behind this! It's going to take the efforts of a truly talented investigative reporter to get to the bottom of this. That reporter is YOU, Greg. Report back to us when you have some results. But not before then, OK, Greg? This story is too important. We want you on it full time.

I keep thinking that people who point to hillary's 'electability' really must not get out much. even the new yorkers I know that voted for her for senate don't plan to vote for her against mccain.

I second that - every New Yorker I know, and I know a bunch, can't stand her.

Just like they can't stand Rudy.

Seriously.

Wow! I thought I was the only one whose brain did that...or a combination of "dim" and "imbecilic." It's not nice, but it is unintentional, I swear.

Um, guys, you do know that Freepers and other rabid right wingers call Democrats "dims" don't you?"

I can't get a fix on how many of these so called Clinton supporters are really trolls, but I caught one last week using the term: "heartland" and when I called him on it, he blew up with a squeak and a cloud of noxious gas and hasn't been seen since.

hrebendorf,

Are you enjoying yourself with marking up pictures? Very mature and reflects so well on you and others supporting Obama.

Regarding the new picture of Obama that I am using, it is real and was reportedly taken at the Capital recently. It was part of discussion that noted Obama has again taken up smoking.

Matthew
http://www.TheProblemWithObama.com