Obama-Backing Unions Demand Hillary "Sever All Ties" With Penn
Change to Win, the coalition of unions backing Obama, is upping the pressure on the Hillary campaign to dump Mark Penn, releasing a new statement demanding that she "sever all ties" with Penn and launching an online pressure campaign designed to force her to do just that.
The latest statement ties Penn directly to "triangulation," a word folks obviously associate with the Clintons, and blames it directly for the decline of living conditions for the American worker.
"High-priced consultants like Mark Penn who shape our laws to suit their clients are poisoning our political system and robbing voters of their faith in our democratic process," the statement says. "Triangulation has been the strangulation of the hopes and dreams of American workers...There is no place at the table for union-busters."
There's no evidence that the Obama campaign is orchestrating Change to Win's continuing pressure on Hillary, but it's obvious that Penn, and Hillary's refusal to get rid of him once and for all, is a gift that keeps on giving for the Obama camp.
The question, though, is whether this latest broadside represents enough of an advancement of the assault on Penn to merit significantly more coverage.
Separately, The Huffington Post has some brutal quotes about Penn from Hillary-ite Paul Begala.
Full Change to Win statement after the jump.
THERE IS NO PLACE AT THE TABLE FOR UNION-BUSTERSWASHINGTON, D.C. The following is a statement from Change to Win executive director Greg Tarpinian calling on Sen. Clinton to sever all ties with Mark Penn after media reports revealed he is still participating in campaign strategy calls, conducting polling, dispensing advice and managing Clinton's direct-mail operation, despite being stripped of his chief campaign strategist title. Change to Win launched an online campaign today calling on Sen. Hillary Clinton to sever all ties with Mark Penn.
We must break from the politics of the past. High-priced consultants like Mark Penn who shape our laws to suit their clients are poisoning our political system and robbing voters of their faith in our democratic process. Triangulation has been the strangulation of the hopes and dreams of American workers. Mixing the peoples work with corporate work might be good for business, but there is no question its bad for Americas workers.
Consultants whose firms counsel and countenance corporations or countries that deny the basic human rights of workers should have no place in any campaign seeking the support of Americas workers. Mark Penn, while serving as an advisor to the Clinton campaign contracted to advocate for a job killing trade agreement with a nation that is the most dangerous place in the world for trade unionists. To make matters worse, his firm also advocates for a corporation notorious for aggressively suppressing the rights of workers. There is no place at the table for union-busters.
These back room dealings remind us yet again of the choice voters have in this election: bringing people together to change this broken system and forge new solutions that help restore the American Dream for Americas workers or the status quo where Washington insiders buy their way into the policies they want.








Comments (79)
I demand that Obama sever all ties with Wright.
April 11, 2008 1:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, I agree! Clearly Wright's advocacy for the government of Colombia is a problem.
April 11, 2008 1:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Note that in the article Greg cited, Paul Begala at least implicitly criticizes his candidate, Hillary Clinton, by asking why he hasn't been fired:
"I have nothing but contempt for Mr. Penn," said Begala at a New York City breakfast sponsored by the non-profit group Public Agenda. "And for those of us who wanted to see him out from the beginning, it became almost a Rumsfeldian thing. And he is not even fired. He has been demoted. How could this be?"
April 11, 2008 3:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
I can't understand why Obama didn't fire the advisor who called the Canadian ambassador and told him Senator Obama didn't mean a thing he was telling the Ohio voters, that it was just political rhetoric.
The only reason I can think of is that Obama must have instructed him to make the call.
April 13, 2008 2:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
He will be speaking again soon.
Should be interesting.
April 11, 2008 1:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
You must be talking about Bill Clinton. Yeah, what will he say about Bosnia next.
April 11, 2008 2:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
I demand that Hillary tell us more about her cult.
April 11, 2008 2:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's the silliest little Rovian/Orwellian non-sequitor yet to have been posted by an Obamabot. No wonder you've got that Star Wars thing going: You're living in another universe.
April 11, 2008 3:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Get back under your bridge Mister Troll, you.
April 11, 2008 6:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry, I forgot Hillary's cult link Mr. Troll: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/barbara-ehrenreich/hillarys-nasty-pastorate_b_92361.html
April 11, 2008 6:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hmm....well Wright isn't part of Obama's campaign, Obama isn't paying Wright, and Wright being Obama's former pastor is in no way a conflict of interest with Obama's stated policy positions.
But hey, nice try. Once again, I love the desperation from the Hillary supporters. They can't excuse Hillary keeping Penn, or the conflicts of interest and double dealing, or Bill's connections, so they come on here and go "Rev. Wright!" sounding just like Sean Hannity. Heh, I hope it feels good that you are parroting Fox News, way to be a Democrat. Oh well, desperation is desperation.
April 11, 2008 2:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why?
Is Wright a paid member of the Obama campaign who is simultaneously being paid as a lobbyist by the Columbian government to conduct public relations and communications services for Colombia for the approval of a trade agreement with the U.S.?
Or did Wright simply say some things that you disagree with?
April 11, 2008 3:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
OK. I'd like to see every white person (I'm a white person) in America who has every heard one of his family members, friends, classmates or colleagues use the "N" word that didn't leave the room in protest or condemn the white person who used it. The racist hyprocrisy of some white people in America is absolutely staggering! If Obama should condemn his preacher for his offensive words, every white person in America who has uttered or heard the "N" should have condemned the person who said it no matter who that person was. Father, mother, grandfather, grandmother, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, boss, colleague, friend, neighbor, classmate or perfect stranger! Any guesses how many times Clinton and McCain have either uttered or heard someone use the "N" word in their lifetimes? And by the way, how many times have YOU (Otto F) said of heard the "N" word without being condemned for saying it or without condemning the person who said it?! People in glass houses...................
April 11, 2008 5:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thats exactly right and we want him to sever ties with Rezko to! And Billy Ayers and Meeks!And the rest of the corrupt leaders in chicago! Vote Hillary
April 11, 2008 5:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
I dont agree with this...though mainly cuz i think that itd be better for them if penn had his hands in as many things as possible.
April 11, 2008 1:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
You forgot to add that Ed Rendell also thinks Penn should be fired.
Oh, and about 90% of Clinton supporters.
Pretty much everybody except Hillary and Bill.
April 11, 2008 1:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Pay no attention to gadfly Arianna Huffington. You'll recall that she's never been a fan of the Clintons, going back to her archconservative period when she even established a website that touted the removal of Bill Clinton from office, called Resignation.com."
Nuff said.
April 11, 2008 1:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Pay no attention to gotalife.
April 11, 2008 2:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Please stop asking Hillary Rambo Clinton to be accountable for her campaign staff.
You are going to provoke more of this:
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/11/clinton-laughs-off-colombia-questions/
April 11, 2008 1:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Like Christmas every day!
It's unfortunate for Clinton that her campaign doesn't recognize this.
April 11, 2008 2:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wish people would stop demanding that she fire him completely. I'm terrified she'll do it. It's bad enough that he was demoted.
April 11, 2008 2:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
You said it best (I think it was about the Penn situation): Obama supporters get to experience some schadenfreude on a regular basis with this issue...
April 11, 2008 2:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary vindicated once again:
It turns that it actually takes much more than
Fifty Million dollars in speech fees to put food on
The Clinton Table.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0408/9531.html
The Clintons have made a $100-million fortune since leaving the White House, but a Politico analysis found that hasn’t kept Bill Clinton from taking full advantage of the publicly funded perks offered to ex-presidents.
In fact, his presidential retirement benefits cost taxpayers almost as much as those of the other two living ex-presidents combined.
The price tag for Clinton’s federal retirement allowance from 2001 through the end of this year will run $8 million, compared to $5.5 million for George H. W. Bush’s and $4 million for Jimmy Carter’s during the same period.
April 11, 2008 2:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
That doesn't even include secret service!
I appreciate that President's should get health care, but I say if a President is making over $10 million a year, then he should reject tax-payers playing for his office space in NYC.
Just saying.
(and yes, if Obama becomes President, and makes a lot of money off book sales and speaking engagements after he leaves office, he should not get tax-payer money either).
April 11, 2008 2:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
paying*
April 11, 2008 2:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/11/begala-nothing-but-contem_n_96226.html
That Begala article is damning!
"I have nothing but contempt for Mr. Penn," said Begala at a New York City breakfast sponsored by the non-profit group Public Agenda. "And for those of us who wanted to see him out from the beginning, it became almost a Rumsfeldian thing. And he is not even fired. He has been demoted. How could this be?"
"Mark Penn did have this strategy," Begala said. "He wrote a book called Microtrends in which he argued that the era of big trends is over. That's like going to New Orleans before Katrina and saying the era of big storms is over. It might end up being true but it could be really wrong."
Taking more, often humor-laden swipes, Begala went on: "[Penn] is looking to target non-Catholic Latino woman. All two of them... He slices the baloney incredibly thin. And in addition to being a political strategist, he is heading one of the biggest public relations firm in Washington, which is a huge conflict of interest. The campaign ended up looking like Exxon Mobil instead of what it really is..."
April 11, 2008 2:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Begala is no Lanny Davis or James Carville. When he pops up on CNN, I can't not like him even when he's spinning away. He's had several moments of cutting the B.S. like this and that's probably why I feel the way I do.
But as far as Mark Penn goes, I'll say it again as dopey as it sounds: "He's putting the "Penn" in Pennsylvania for Obama. He's the gift that keeps on giving.
That "Rumsfeldian thing" is something that I've seen and think Hillary's loyalty is sadly equal in many ways to that of George W. Bush (see Brownie, Fredo, Rumsfeld, etc...).
April 11, 2008 2:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
About Hillary's loyalty....
This is from March 12, 2008, NY Times. This paragraph leapt out at me:
April 11, 2008 2:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yikes. Sorry about the hanging html tags....
April 11, 2008 2:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow. Thanks for that-will look up the article.
April 11, 2008 2:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm crossing my fingers he'll be out by the end of the weekend. He takes Hillary in a direction that is unnatural for her, which is why I think she hasn't connected like she should have.
April 11, 2008 2:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
It isn't just Obama supporting unions, Rendell and other Hillary supporters aren't happy that she has kept Penn on too.
No matter who you support, you have to admit that keeping him around isn't good.
April 11, 2008 2:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow! Apparently Change to Win thinks this election is NOT over!
Glad to see Obama and his supporters have finally realized this.
April 11, 2008 2:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
There's a great article up at Counterpunch on Billary the Two headed Clinton beast and their dealings with Colombia. Penn is at the core of Hillary as a politician, which is why she can't fire him.
How Obama Could Seize Pennsylvania
The Clintons and Their Sordid Colombia Advocacy
By NIKOLAS KOZLOFF
http://www.counterpunch.org/kozloff04112008.html
As a Michael Harrington Democrat, I find the Clintons here too much like Grover Cleveland for my taste. Gene Debs would approve of this flim-flam with a government that kills its workers. Pullman Strike anyone?
April 11, 2008 2:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Clintons are afraid to let Penn go. He knows too much about what has gone on inside their camp, and might just start spilling the beans. That is the only reason Hillary has clung to him. Can you say Dick Morris revisited, Boys and Girls!
April 11, 2008 2:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
He'd be toast after that, so wouldn't this be a case of biting off your nose to spite your face?
April 11, 2008 2:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
If they fired him, he would be toast then. Who else would let him run a campaign. It would free him up to make a huge tell all book deal. I think Hillary would have nightmares of Penn releasing such a book in the fall, if she were the nominee. The Clintons are not stupid politicians. They know the damage that is being done by clinging to Penn, so they must be more afraid of what damage he can do, if he were cut free.
April 11, 2008 2:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Proof of disagreement between Hillary and Bill on a policy is proof someone, somewhere, is making millions from it! Never mind Tom Daschle has supported it. And if the millions aren't found, it then naturally means that Hillary can't control Bill.
Wingnuts were right about the Clintons!
April 11, 2008 2:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
For everyone in the labor movement, whether they're pro-Clinton, pro-Obama or neutral, this ought to be a no-brainer. Even without the Colombian catastrophe, Penn represents union-busters, corrupt foreign governments and corporate scoundrels. A whore like him has no place in the campaign of any serious Democratic candidate for president.
This begs the question of what the union leaders who back Hillary will do. According to The New York Times of April 8, AFSCME President Gerald "McEntee acknowledged phoning Mrs. Clinton on Saturday to urge her to fire Mr. Penn." If McEntee was satisfied that Clinton changed Penn's title, then it's clear he wasn't serious. If McEntee is serious, though, where is the outrage? Where is the threat to withdraw AFSCME's endorsement? (It took a heck of a lot less provocation for McEntee to withdraw AFSCME's endorsement of Howard Dean four years ago.) For that matter, where is Tom Buffenbarger of the Machinists, whose union has been decimated by foreign competition?
April 11, 2008 2:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
O I hope you're right - this is too much fun. I want her to refuse to actually get rid of him.
I'm loving this.
Laugh off another one of those conflict of interest questions, Hillary.
Not like you haven't had to answer them before - remember your friends, one of whom went to jail for you?
April 11, 2008 2:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
When is she going to sever her ties with the Wagging Finger?
Spine of Steel!!!
Camille Paglia offers trenchant, timely insight
I agree that the male staff who Hillary attracts are slick, geeky weasels or rancid, asexual cream puffs. ...If I were to hazard a guess, I'd say Hillary is reconstituting the toxic hierarchy of her childhood household, with her on top instead of her drill-sergeant father. All those seething beta males (as you so aptly describe them) are versions of her sad-sack brothers, who got the short end of the Rodham DNA stick. The compulsive war-room mentality of both Clintons is neurosis writ large. The White House should not be a banging, rocking washer perpetually stuck on spin cycle. Many Democrats, including myself, have come to doubt whether Hillary has any core values or even a stable sense of identity. With her outlandish fibbing and naive self-puffery, her erratic day-to-day changes of tone and message, her glassy, fixed smiles, and her leaden and embarrassingly unpresidential jokes about pop culture, she has started to seem like one of those manic, seductively vampiric patients in trashy old Hollywood hospital flicks like "The Snake Pit." How anyone could confuse Hillary's sourly cynical, male-bashing megalomania with authentic feminism is beyond me.
April 11, 2008 2:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
I guess I should just remind everyone that the Clintons' middle name is "conflict of Interest" - does no one remember all the law firm bullshit?
This is just an invitation for some Clinton hating journalist, of which there are more than a few, to dig every bit of that back up.
O joy. I really want to revisit the Arkansas land deals. *sigh*
April 11, 2008 2:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Otto, Wright has nothing to do with our government and its system. He cannot shape anything except with in his own church. This article is about conflicts of interest with regards to the system of government. Got it?
April 11, 2008 2:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
I was just going to shoot off a comment asking that he be kept on, but that everyone keep talking about his generally poor judgment etc, and that it would be continuously tied to Clinton. I though I'd better scan the comments first...
good work, team.
April 11, 2008 2:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nice try, but I wouldn't count on that, if I were you. ;)
[pssst: let me tell you a secret; they get it, they just like to pretend they don't cause they like to talk about it. It's the current RW buzz]
April 11, 2008 2:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
One of the main things that came out of Whitewater was that Hillary Clinton had one conflict of interest after another inside that law firm.
It was all about her, too - it had little to do with Bill. I could go back and dig it all up again myself, but the thought really exhausts me.
One of the reasons I wish she'd drop out and go away is to stop this inevitable rehashing of the entire Clinton criminal oeuvre.
April 11, 2008 2:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
The travel office staffing scandal and missing FBI files was all Hillary, Feigned Giggle Fits, Clinton's doing too.
April 11, 2008 3:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Obama Movement [if there really was any such thing], has turned into a mad chorus of shrieking Clinton hatred regurgitated from old paranoid boilerplate wingnut conspiratorial tripe. The candidate Obama doesn't even exist, which is understandable is there really is no movement at all -- if he dropped out today there would be nothing to carry in his absence. I wish it were possible for the commentators here to see just how unhinged and wingnutty you've become.
April 11, 2008 3:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Imagine, then, how embarassing it must be for Clinton to be losing to this nothingness.
April 11, 2008 3:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
"The Obama Movement [if there really was any such thing], has turned into a mad chorus of shrieking Clinton hatred regurgitated from old paranoid boilerplate wingnut conspiratorial tripe."
So, rather than address the fact that the major players in the Clinton campaign staff are involved in conflict of interest-for-profit endeavors while running a campaign that makes statements opposing the very endeavors that her former Chief Strategist was being paid to lobby on behalf of, you'd rather call names and make generalizations?
What does this have to do with the facts on hand? Do you disagree that this is a major conflict of interest? Do you disagree with the statement by the labor unions, cited in the article?
This is a real issue, one that President Bush is attempting to fast-track in Congress, and Senator Clinton herself appears to feel strongly enough about to state: "As I have said for months, I oppose the deal. I have spoken out against the deal, I will vote against the deal, and I will do everything I can to urge the Congress to reject the Colombia Free Trade Agreement."
I think that the point that you are missing regarding this issue is that many of the Obama supporters that you are deriding actually agree with Senator Clinton's statements on this issue. What we disagree with is the influence of a high-ranking strategist who is moonlighting as a lobbyist for the very trade agreement that she is doing "everything she can to urge Congress to reject."
April 11, 2008 4:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
In Obama’s autobiography, "Dreams From My Father," Obama mentions studying the Koran and describes the public school as "a Muslim school." In fact Obama learned to recite the Quran in the Arabic language rather than his native language (Indonesian) at the time, which is accorded the highest value and status in the mindset of Islamic fundamentalist societies.
Obama describes his new found "Christian" faith as: (1) Suspicious of dogma (2) Without any monopoly on the truth (3) Nontransferable to others (4) Infused with a big healthy dose of doubt, and (5) Indulgent of and compatible with all other religions.
On February 27th, speaking to Kristof of The New York Times, Barack Hussein Obama said the Muslim call to prayer is "one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset."
In an interview with Nicholas Kristof, published in The New York Times, Obama recited the Muslim call to prayer, the Adhan, "with a first-class [Arabic] accent."
According to Islamic scholars, reciting the Shahada, the Muslim declaration of faith, makes one a Muslim. This simple yet profound statement expresses a Muslim's complete acceptance of, and total commitment to, the message of Islam. Obama chanted it with pride and finesse.
The Indonesian Times reports: "Barack Hussein Obama might have convinced some Americans that he is no longer a Muslim, but so far he has not convinced many in the world's most populous Muslim country who still see him as a Muslim and a crusader for Islam."
http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/12745.htm
April 11, 2008 3:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ah, the dirt.
Ouch.
April 11, 2008 3:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Shorter: Look! Look! There's a pony over there!!!
Hilarious!
Next post? REZKO REZKO REZKO REZKO REZKO REZKO REZKO REZKO REZKO REZKO!
April 11, 2008 3:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
If you want to list wingnut publications that revel in the dirt try:
http://www.judicialwatch.org/HW-corruption-chronicle-posts
Judicial watch is a conservative group that seems to like to pick on the Clintons. This site is definetly biased but not nearly as biased as israelinsider.com This same Site also hammers Jimmy Carter for being so outrageous as to talk to Hammas.
So in the name of credible discourse, please try to use credible news sources rather than extremist viewpoints such as judicialwatch or israelinsider. Everyone goes blind when staring into the sun.
April 11, 2008 4:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
The muslim thing again? What is this, 2007?
April 11, 2008 3:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
The GOP (through its propaganda wing Fox News) is having a lot of fun with this latest back and forth between Obama and Hillary. And the photo of Obama they use for the story makes him look like a dufus.
April 11, 2008 3:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary, Feigned Giggle Fits, Clinton responds to the question by saying: "and how many angels dance on the head of a pin?"
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/11/clinton-laughs-off-colombia-questions/
Just turn around and ask Mr Penn Head, Ms. Feigned Giggle Fits; he is still on your campaign team!
April 11, 2008 3:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
thanks for the link...that was an excellent article. the ball is in obama's court. let's see if he ceases the opportunity to highlight this fundamental difference between himself and hrc! whatever he does, he needs to proceed with extreme caution. hrc has the majority of non-black women backing her and she does well with sympathy votes! if perceived she is being picked on, legitimately or not, she will get sympathy votes again.
oh what a bind obama is in!!
April 11, 2008 3:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
O my God - nevermind Hillary's conflicts of interest -
Obama HUSSEIN X is a Muslim with a racist Christian preacher that everyone is bitching about!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Or should that be Obama Osama HUSSEIN X?
April 11, 2008 3:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Kind of a risky policy for that Pa. union to try to drive a wedge between its members and Clinton when most of them are Clinton supporters? Probably not. I'm a union member, and our union doesn't care what we think either.
April 11, 2008 3:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Uber Hillary backer, Governor Ed. Rendell of Pennsylvania, is calling for Hillary to fire Mark Penn.
I am sure he has taken the pulse of the labor movement in his state.
April 11, 2008 3:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
For anyone who thinks all the old Whitewater stuff is rightwing conspiracy bullshit - fine. But don't imagine for one second that the Republicans aren't going to bring every last bit of it up.
I'm not vouching for what came out in those investigations being true, though people went to jail over the law firm, so something was going on - but most of America already has it firmly in their heads that the Clintons are apt to walk a fine legal line. So here we go again. Which explodes totally the already bogus electability argument, A/K/A he's too black to win. Maybe, though I don't think so at all. On the other hand, she's the pot calling the kettle because she has been dirtied from head to toe already by the Republicans the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy - so what the hell makes anyone think they aren't going to just start over and then add more? Penn looks to be a very fertile field in that respect.
April 11, 2008 3:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
hence the fundamental problem i have with our innate ability to exude prejudice at every turn!!
--so what if obama is a mulim? are all muslims bad? are they all terrorist? why is it ok for us americans to express such hatred against a group of people's religion and yet shriek at rev wright's negative comments? we are proud of our prejudice so long as it is accepted by the mass. that is wrong and hypocritical. i shudder when i think about of the law abiding muslim citizens who reside in this country. are they not people too?
i am impressed that obama can recite the pray with a perfect accent. it is called tolerance. regardless of what he was, he is claiming to be christian today. i could care less if he ends up being jehovah's witness tomorrow. the point is, the man is a fine upstanding citizen. keep the focus on issues that matter, issues that affect his or hrc's presidency. baptist, catholic, jewish, muslim, those issues are separate from the state. remember separation of church and state? it still exist people.
April 11, 2008 3:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is everyone buying the narrative the Clintons are selling you?
Bill Clinton has far more commitments to Colombia than Mark Penn.
But if you want to deflect attention from that, put the focus on Penn, get everyone in a tizzy and announce Penn's dismissal next week, right before the April 16 and April 18 debates, and PA. primary.
Like NAFTAGATE before the Ohio primary, and the demotion of Penn after the Clintons claimed not knowing about his association with Colombia, Hillary will be seen once again as distancing herself from free trade when in fact, she's married to the biggest proponent of it.
Let's not forget that Hillary called for the president to boycott the opening ceremony at the Beijing Olympics.
While it's not logical to you or me, distancing yourself from anything having to do with China is seen by union members as complete support for the American worker.
Granted, Hillary won't vote for the current Colombia Free Trade agreement.
But you can't look at one hand of the Clintons without knowing what the other hand is doing.
All in all, the Clintons will have spent four weeks pretending to take action against free trade.
April 11, 2008 4:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
PLEASE Hillary PLEASE keep Mark Penn.
As an old Ohio pol used to say, "you don't want them to take the punching bag out of the gym."
April 11, 2008 4:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
The temper tantrums like the trollop who rhymes with "punt."
Ah, the dirt.
Ouch
April 11, 2008 4:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Specter thinks Obama will take Pennsylvania - CNN
April 11, 2008 4:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Zogby has Clinton up only 4. Uh oh. That doesn't give me confidence.
April 11, 2008 4:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm still laughing at "Himmary". Who came up with that for McCain here yesterday?
April 11, 2008 4:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
I hereby "donate" the TPM-pseudonym "Himmary Trollopsicle" to the first taker. Bidding starts at $80 million. In speaker's fees.
April 11, 2008 4:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Hill-backer's cheer:
Cocaine Wright! Cocaine Wright!
Muslim Muslim
Cocaine Wright!
April 11, 2008 4:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Requisite Obama chant?
"Scoooore booooard!"
April 11, 2008 4:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
You forgot Rezko and Ayers!
April 11, 2008 5:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Who would ever guess that we are all (most anyway) democrats here? I for one will be glad when the June Superdelegates convention is held so that we can get a presumptive nominee and start working on getting OUR country, OUR international reputation, and OUR freedoms back. At the risk of sounding Wright-ish, WE Americans are not perfect, but we are striving for perfection in economic opportunity, freedom of religion, and humanity. Not all republicans are bad people, but boy we found the worst of the worst the last 8 years and we as democrats need to unite against the prospect of another 4 years of sliding backward in worldwide respect, increased imbalance in economic opportunities, and...well you get the drift.
April 11, 2008 5:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
TPM needs to post the CNN video of Paul Begala with Wolf Blitzer bashing Mark Penn again on The Situation Room today.
April 11, 2008 6:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
I swear if McCain wins this election I will volunteer to help those who intend to hunt down every person who wasted so much time and effort putting down other Democrats while they could of been out working to get things in place for the fall election...regardless of who the candidate might be. How any of this crap is supposed to help any of us defies explanation. Snide talk and infantile ravings while hiding behind phony avatars and made up names in a limited view forum is helping who in what way? Get the hell out in the real world and work to accomplish something. Choose the candidate of your choice and think what you want about the other but they are working in the real world to accomplish something not hiding in forums and trying to show off.
April 11, 2008 6:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary, go fuck yourself - since Bill won't.
April 11, 2008 10:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is a person running for president? She is completely unhinged! When asked at a news conference about Bill's lucrative deals with Columbia, Hillary looks very serious as she listens. Then, out of nowhere, she breaks into giggles, mumbles something about angels on the head of a pin? Completely Bizzare!
Hillary dear, there is therapy and medication for many mental conditions.
Check out the vid from CNN. It is disturbing:
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/11/clinton-laughs-off-colombia-questions/
April 12, 2008 11:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Me too. Why is everybody so hush-hush about her ties to "The Family"?
April 13, 2008 1:53 AM | Reply | Permalink