Obama-Backing General: Clinton Lacks "Moral Authority" Over Bosnia Gaffes
A key military surrogate for Barack Obama went after Hillary Clinton on the Bosnia story today -- triggering an accusation of hypocrisy from the Hillary camp in light of Obama's own words about the controversy during this week's debate, when he said people should let the story go.
"One of the inherent duties of the president of the United States is to lay a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier on Memorial Day," said Gen. Walter Stewart on an Obama campaign conference call this afternoon -- then proceeding to lambast Hillary over the Bosnia gaffes. "Imagine the lack of moral authority she has now to lay a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier on Memorial Day."
Clinton spokesman Phil Singer immediately pounced: "When it comes to negative campaign tactics, Senator Obama has been a hypocrite from day one, decrying attack politics from one side of his mouth while he and his campaign wage a character assassination effort from the other."
Obama spokesman Hari Sevugan disassociated the campaign from Stewart's remarks: "We obviously do not agree with that sentiment."















This is fighting back:
"When it comes to negative campaign tactics, Senator Obama has been a hypocrite from day one, decrying attack politics from one side of his mouth while he and his campaign wage a character assassination effort from the other."
This is caving:
"We obviously do not agree with that sentiment."
Nuff said.
April 19, 2008 10:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Goat Life gets pretty tiresome on this site.
April 19, 2008 11:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Because he doesn't have a life?
April 20, 2008 11:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
hi Goatlife... look what I found
http://www.hillaryproject.com/index.php?/en/story-details/what_hillary_clinton_and_the_media_are_hiding_from_the_voters/
what are you gonna do when this gets out?
April 20, 2008 2:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
and before you respond...my last post was NOT an error in the spelling of your name...
anyway...back on topic...
there's also the smoking gun!!
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=56305
are you going to respond???? hehehe
after Apr 25th
April 20, 2008 2:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not-Gotalife has been trolling for so long...one wonders why it (he, she?) doesn't just get a new user name (of course the best thing would be if they got a life).
April 20, 2008 10:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
yeah, because there is no difference between telling the truth about when she lies, and or not saying anything and having people call him weak. Everybody game for this game!!! What a bunch of freaking hypocritical liars. I mean there is not one ounce of intellectual honesty from Hillary or her supporters, and I think that thats accurate because all the others who are honest have came along and admitted what is true. She is a liar! Willful ignorance to that fact isnt fooling anyone at this stage of the game!!!
April 19, 2008 10:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
I recommend everyone follow the link Eric provided to CNN, as there's a more complete transcription of Gen. Walters' comments there. His criticism focuses on Clinton making jokes about the sniper-fire lie, which I think is useful to know when evaluating his comments.
The missing piece is:
"Now we can assume, and let's keep in mind that Senator Clinton has said she was under sniper fire, or she joked about, which to me was the cruelest part of all this, she joked about it with Jay Leno. …"
April 19, 2008 11:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
er, Gen. Stewart
April 19, 2008 11:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well General Clark backed her up and said that it was very dangerous.
I think I will go with the General that actually gave us our last military victory.
Clinton/Clark.
April 19, 2008 11:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well General Clark backed her up and said that it was very dangerous.
General Clark did not say that Hillary (and Chelsea and Sinbad) were in a "very dangerous" situation in Tuzla, gottalie. Have you already forgotten that after stonewalling as long as she could, Hillary finally admitted that the story wasn't true?
She knew there was a ton of video of that photo op, but she lied anyway. Multiple times on multiple days. Why she's gotta lie like that I don't know, but apparently she can't help it.
She knew that it didn't even pass the common sense test. We'd never put a first lady and her sixteen-year-old daughter (and Sinbad!) into a situation where they'd have to duck and run because of a danger of sniper fire. And she lied anyway. Multiple times on multiple days. Why she's gotta lie like that I don't know, but apparently she can't help it.
She finally admitted that it wasn't true. When Bill brought it up again recently she told him to STFU. She'd probably like her supporters to do the same.
But I'm not one of her supporters, gottalie, and I'd like to thank you for reminding people yet again about Hillary's lies.
Feel free to bring up the "screw'em" story as often as you want, too.
April 19, 2008 11:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
wow, you actually believe Bill put his wife and child in harm's way?
And you still support him?
April 19, 2008 11:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
It being dangerous is not the same as ‘running with my head down dodging sniper fire’; she LIED, accept it!
April 20, 2008 7:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
He works for her, you dunderhead. He's probably hoping against hope to be on her ticket as well.
You desperately want her to win and it allows you to say all sorts of stupid stuff here. See, the parallels are striking.
April 20, 2008 8:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is about the General Clark comment. He has probably been promised the vice president position if Hillary gets elected. Though I respect Clark, it is hard for me to respect the position he has taken by supporting Hillary. Say Anything Hillary mentioning sniper fire which she later said was untrue and known to be false by her, is just as bad as a person wearing a military pin they never earned. Anybody who still supports Hillary after this, ignoring her lies, has a problem with honesty himself and is willing to say anything without regard to how it reflects on him. That is why she is the lesser candidate, much lesser.
April 20, 2008 12:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
THIS IS EXCELLENT NEWS!! FOR HILLARY!!!
April 19, 2008 11:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey! Where've you been? I've missed you!
April 20, 2008 11:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
It makes me wonder about the title of certain post topics. I think we all being played because we all know the disgusting game that politics is, and even if Obama tries to stay above it, and has not attacked her in the same vicious way she has attacked him, he still has to play the politics game. The people that exploit that (including hillary), I just dont have any respect for them. If they take this away from the rightful winner, I promise, at least for the urban neighborhood I'm in, the people will never come back to the Democratic party. Now that's off my chest, I'm ready to sit back and see, well see what happens....:)
April 19, 2008 11:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
I live in the suburbs, but I will convince my low information relatives to not vote. She and her bigwigs can take a chance, but believe me they will lose.
April 20, 2008 7:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Time for the Hillary supporters to clutch their pearls.
April 19, 2008 11:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Don't you mean they should cling to them? I have a good feeling about Tuesday. I think Obama is going to do fine!
April 20, 2008 11:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Clark, who wasn't there, backed her up....but her pilot, Col Changose (who was there) said "there wasn't even a bumblebee" and furthermore had there been any...ANY...danger they would have never landed with the first lady and the first daughter...all make-believe...Oh..excuse me, misspeak. I agree with the general and I for one am sick and tired of Hillary's school yard bully tactics. when Obama backs off she calls him a wimp and when anyone hits back, her campaign whines and says "no fair"....like hubby says....you don't like the heat...stay out of the kitchen...I am glad that Obama has some supporters that, like me, are fed up with their Draco Malfoy tactics.
April 19, 2008 11:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Reading about Obama's ethics bill is a joke.
He does not hold hearings on Afghanistan oversight committee.
What are you people thinking?
He should not be in the Senate let alone a candidate for President.
Sober up people.
April 19, 2008 11:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think goatlife is a software bot that has around 100 phrases that are randomly put together... an experiment in phenomenology.
Hillary Clinton lied about having courage under fire.
She voted for Kyl-Lierberman.
Why is she still int he campaign?
She is broke. It's all over soon.
See... it's easy to be go at life. Just string together talkng points, summarize with a remark abotu how the candidate is finished, and post. Leave the interpretation to the plebes.
Did you go to school to learn this, goatlife, or did you reach your Derrida Omega Point on your own?
April 20, 2008 12:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good tactic, when you are losing the argument, change the subject, LMAO!
April 20, 2008 8:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Um, I'm pretty sure that there committee is the European foreign relations committee, and last I checked, Afghanistan isn't part of Europe.
April 20, 2008 11:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama at least lived in the state he represents. Hillary represents a state she never lived in and got the Senator gig solely through her political connections....how's that for sober up?
April 20, 2008 12:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Whatever happened to that claim on Selma, that Obama claimed to have?
April 20, 2008 1:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's probably in the same place as Sir Edmund Hillary.
April 20, 2008 1:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Again, trying to pass on misinformation. Senator Obama in his book wrote that his parent meet at the University of Hawaii. He NEVER said they met in Selma. He said they decided to go ahead with their interracial marriage because of the stirring in Selma, which is not accurate, but not the same as what you are claiming.
April 20, 2008 8:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh touché integrity! However, I do feel that there is a slight bigger difference to Obama laying a claim on Selma than there is Hillary just explaining why she had an extra L in her name. I mean wasn't like she stood up at a rally and told people she had a claim on anything especially as important as oh, let's say the Civil Rights movement because of it.
April 20, 2008 2:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
And what does this have to do with the topic in question? Oh wait... let me respond like Goatlife:
You don't respond with facts, just insults.
Hillary is doomed. Deal with it.
You have backed the loosing horse. Nothing to see here. Bring up Selma, I bring up Tuzla. So what? Your candidate is still loosing.
(copyright Goatlife)
April 20, 2008 3:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
What this has to do with the topic in question is that if we're going to point out lies constantly let's point in all directions "constantly". Also, she does in fact give a correct account of her trip to Bosnia in her book. And either way I don't see this issue to be as serious as what they are making it out to be. But that's my opinion. And I could play that. let's bring up that lie game all day long with you. But I've made my point on this topic and voiced my opinion, which of course, like you I am entitled too. Oh, by the way...where exactly was there no facts in my post and where was there any insults?
April 20, 2008 3:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, I was there with Hillary in Tuzla, and she actually DID get shot, but her flag pin deflected the bullet. They don't want anyone to know the facts because it would show what a terrible mother she was for taking her young daughter into a dangerous war zone. So actually, when she told the story she was telling the truth, but now she remembers that it's supposed to not have happened and so now she's lying, saying that she lied in the first place.
I was there! I swear!
April 20, 2008 11:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think if Obama makes it to POTUS, he should show his "moral authority" by having William Ayers accompany him, in laying a wreathe at the Tomb of the unknown soldier. Maybe Gen. Walter Stewart would like to join the fine outstanding citizen Ayers in the event, too?
April 20, 2008 6:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
IF the information is correct, Williams Ayers never blew up any military personnel nor did he lie about it.
April 20, 2008 8:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
And he is currently a very active citizen, and a general good guy.
April 20, 2008 11:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
oh what a dreary bunch of dimwits you Americans are. and cowards to boot.
on another note, I dated a prof at City College once. Nice girl, but a real dumb bint when it came to understanding the real world. But even she understood what a disaster open admissions had been for CCNY. Once the "poor man's Harvard," exactly the kind of school for poor but bright kids like myself, in 1974 or so the city buckled to African-American demands to offer admission to anyone who showed up. Result? Within two years the teaching standards of the school were shit, as was the reputation. And nobody even benefited, because now all the kids getting once golden degrees had a piece of worthless paper. And no education either, just four years sitting in a classroom. Now CCNY is making its way back, admitting students on the basis of merit, and a CCNY degree is again a respected credential. Any lessons here?
April 20, 2008 6:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, you are an idiot and a prejudiced fool, since you failed to mention the Whites and other ethnicities who were and are getting this the benefit. But, in your world, I would assume it's ONLY the Blacks who are underachievers in the CUNY system, huh?
April 20, 2008 9:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
OH MY GOD! This is the 3rd time I've seen this ridiculous post!
First of all, bragging that you dated a professor makes me wonder what her opinion of YOUR smarts might be all these years later!
Secondly, the lesson that I would take from this is that you are not as BRIGHT as you think you are!
(Especially since you consider this drivel to be worthy of at least 3 postings!)
April 20, 2008 11:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hil-liar-y is the queen of hypocrisy, so Senator Obama and his campaign is just keeping.
April 20, 2008 7:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Was that supposed to be a sentence?
I agree with the first half of the phrase:
Hil-liar-y is the queen of hypocrisy
April 20, 2008 11:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Do go read the incredible expose in the NYT, linked to by Josh Marshall, of conflict of interest among the retired military media 'analysts' and the role they have been playing to do a snow job on the public. These 'analysts' coordinated with and spread talking points from the Pentagon and Rumsfeld, all the while they enjoyed insider access to military contracts for corporations they represent.
I am suddenly interested in having more information on the retired military endorsers of all three remaining candidates. If we knew what the candidates' retired military endorsers were doing today in their private lives, perhaps we could better guess at the direction each candidate would take as president on matters of war and peace, campaign rhetoric aside.
April 20, 2008 8:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
I found that General Walter Stewart had answered to the issue of Hillary lying about Bosnia some weeks ago. This is an excerpt of a letter he wrote on March 28, 2008 about that lie:
"And let me put to rest the security situation at the Tuzla Airport during the March 1996 FLOTUS (first lady of the United States) visit. In the video clip, as she bends to caress the small girl, movement among those behind her reveals a stocky officer wearing four stars on a fatigue cap. I am certain that officer is Admiral “Snuffy” Smith, the senior commander of forces in the Bosnia operation. But Admiral Smith or no, top ranking officers in a war zone don’t wear soft caps unless the security situation warrants it.
Senator Clinton’s recollection of being under fire at Tuzla is an unarguable fabrication – a reprehensible act of valor theft, no ifs, ands, or buts."
I found this 3-28-08 letter on the Pennsylvania Progressive web site, and saw that Gen. Stewart was responding to clarify the meaning of 'valor theft' which had been first asserted by Tammi Hetherington, a woman who had served in Bosnia and was appalled at Senator Clinton's fabrication.
April 20, 2008 8:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Here is a line from General Stewart's 3-28-08 letter which could highlight the 'valor theft' in the behavior of the retired military 'analysts' who slanted their words to serve Rumsfeld and the Pentagon:
"and it is equally shameful for those who have served with honor to defend the dishonor of others."[Stewart letter, 3-28-08]
Of course, Stewart was, in this part of his letter, referring to the Clinton lie about entering Bosnia under sniper fire as 'valor theft', and was targeting any military persons [Clark, et al] who would seem to try to dismiss the significance of her lying about sniper fire as 'equally shameful'.
Here is a link to both the Hetherington and Stewart letters:
http://pennsylvaniaprogressive.typepad.com/my_weblog/2008/03/page/5/
April 20, 2008 10:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Clinton spokesman Phil Singer immediately pounced"
Oh, quit WHINING.
April 20, 2008 10:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
I thought Obama just said "enough with the negative attacks". If Obama really wanted to raise the level of debate in this campaign - if Obama really wanted a new kind of politics - he wouldn't be engaging in, or allowing his surrogates to engage in this kind of negative attack. Over the last few days he's been complaining heavily about just this kind of thing. Yet here comes another gutter attack from the Obama campaign.
Surely even his most ardent supporters know by now that all his complaining about the low level of questions during the first 45 minutes of the ABC debate had nothing to do with any Obama indignation over dirty politics. He was simply upset because he had not handled the questions well. They made him look bad. He wilted. We looked like a wimp. So he and his supporters manufactured all this fake outrage at the questions themselves in hopes to limit the damage. But his campaign has engaged in this type of typical gutter politics all along, and it continues to do so, as the continued attacks on Clinton's Bosnia gaff clearly show.
And if you need any more reminders as to just what a sweet, nobel, above-it-all kind of politician Obama is, here are a few examples from Hillary's website:
Who said Hillary Clinton will "literally do anything to win? The Obama campaign.
Who said she is "attempting to deceive the American people"? The Obama campaign.
Who said she has a secret 20-year plan to become president? Barack Obama.
Who called Hillary a "calculating, poll-tested, divisive figure"? Barack Obama.
Who called Hillary "one of the most secretive politicians in America"? Barack Obama's campaign manager.
Who said Hillary Clinton's campaign is "playing politics with war"? The Obama campaign.
Who said John McCain is seen as more honest and trustworthy than Hillary Clinton? Barack Obama's campaign spokesman.
Who called Hillary Clinton "dishonest"? Barack Obama.
Who referred to Hillary Clinton as "a monster"?
The top Obama advisor.
Who said Hillary Clinton "stands for nothing"?
Barack Obama.
Who said of Hillary Clinton, "The american people are not going to elect a president they do not trust"? Obama's campaign manager.
Who claimed Hillary Clinton "consistently" and "deliberately" misleads the American people? Obama's campaign spokesman.
Who called Hillary Clinton "Annie Oakley"? Barack Obama.
Who said, "We've been very measured in terms of how we talk about Senator Clinton"? Barack Obama.
April 20, 2008 12:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's some moral authority in the news today from Politico:
"Barack Obama’s presidential campaign has worked to assure uneasy gun owners that he believes the Constitution protects their rights and that he doesn’t want to take away their guns.
"But before he became a national political figure, he sat on the board of a Chicago-based foundation that doled out at least nine grants totaling nearly $2.7 million to groups that advocated the opposite positions.
"The foundation funded legal scholarship advancing the theory that the Second Amendment does not protect individual gun owners’ rights, as well as two groups that advocated handgun bans. And it paid to support a book called “Every Handgun Is Aimed at You: The Case for Banning Handguns.”
"Obama’s eight years on the board of the Joyce Foundation, which paid him more than $70,000 in directors fees, do not in any way conflict with his campaign-trail support for the rights of gun owners, Ben LaBolt, a spokesman for Obama’s presidential campaign, asserted in a statement issued to Politico this week."
Of course not. This is just more negative politics. Right Obama supporters? We shouldn't examine what a candidate does. This is all Hillary's fault.
April 20, 2008 12:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
"One of the inherent duties of the president of the United States is to lay a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier on Memorial Day," said Gen. Walter Stewart on an Obama campaign conference call this afternoon -- then proceeding to lambast Hillary over the Bosnia gaffes. "Imagine the lack of moral authority she has now to lay a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier on Memorial Day."
Obama spokesman Hari Sevugan disassociated the campaign from Stewart's remarks: "We obviously do not agree with that sentiment."
Well, where was Stuart when he made that comment? Hillary's campaign has had to be accountable for comments made by people connected with her campaign!! Thank you.
April 20, 2008 12:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary wasn't lying about Bosnia! Here's the video they *didn't* show you:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgfWVfmilOM
April 20, 2008 12:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
After Obama made a very nice jester during last weeks debate, by saying that during a long campaign both candidates will make errors - voters shouldn't zero in on those gaffs all the time. He said this to the Bosnia story of Hillary's.
Not minutes later - Hillary jumps down Obama's throat talking about flag pins and hamas.
I'd say Obama has every right to reverse course and DEFEND himself.
April 20, 2008 12:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Now, let's see. First you have Obama claiming that he never supported a ban on handguns. Then someone found that questionnaire that had his name on it and had a box checked indicating he supported a ban on handguns. So Obama says he never saw the questionnaire, and it was filled out by an aide. Then Obama's own handwriting is discovered on the questionnaire. Then the other night in the ABC debate when the moderators brought it up, Obama says they are mistaken, and that his handwriting was on a different form. That's not true. Obama's handwriting is on the questionnaire with the box checked. But the media gives him a pass on that one, deciding instead to run with the story of Obama's outrage over the disgraceful line of questioning. Meanwhile Obama continues to try to assure uneasy Pennsylvania gun owners that he doesn't want to take away their guns. An now we find out that Obama worked for a group that sharply differed from the position on guns that Obama now says is his. Let's hear some more from Obama about how dirty politics are. Let's hear about how we're not discussing the issues voters want to hear about. Let's try to raise the level of this campaign to only issues that make Obama look good.
April 20, 2008 1:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Hillary campaign chose not to respond to General Stewart back in March of 2008, when he stated and wrote that her lie was a theft of valor.
But, that General Stewart was just on a conference call repeating what he first said weeks ago.......now all of a sudden, the Hillary camp is responding.
But notice, please. Singer offered absolutely no response to Stewart's actual message, either last month or now. Singer's response is to use this only as a hit on Obama, only vaguely referring to the matter as 'character assassination'.
Of course, Singer would not speak directly to General Stewart about using 'character assassination' on Hillary, because Singer would then have to recognize the original point made by Stewart, which was that Hillary was denigrating the character of the military by her Bosnia lie, which was act of 'valor theft' according to the military code of conduct.
April 20, 2008 1:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Omgawd, reading some of these comments I don't know whether to laugh or be afraid. Did Hillary lie about Bosnia? Yes, she did. Was it wrong? Yes, it was. Did she own up to it and apologize, yes she did. So here we are weeks later and this is still coming up, which is fine. However, many of you act as though she's the only one that's ever told any lies. If God was gonna send down some lightening I think it's safe to say she wouldn't be the only one sporting burn marks.
Then there's the comments about William Ayers, you can believe or feel however you want about Obama's relationship with him. But, for those who are brushing off acts of terrorism as no big deal, I don't even know what to think of that. 40 years after it all happened, this person has publicly stated he doesn't regret it, feels they didn't do enough and when asked if he would do it again said "I don't want to discount the possibility"
I tell you what, God forbid he someday doesn't really decide to discount that possibility, if that happens, I'll pray no one, including any of your loved ones, would be standing nearby when the bombs went off.
April 20, 2008 1:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey little chicken guy! You said,
"Did Hillary lie about Bosnia? Yes, she did. Was it wrong? Yes, it was. Did she own up to it and apologize, yes she did."
Well, she was initially questioned about it when others denied it and she stuck by her fallacious story. Then, somebody finally found the video that shows that she lied bald-faced. And she smilingly maintained that her premeditated false statement of fact proved she was "human." If she apologized after that, I think it's little late. Maybe that's why not everybody's putting the same value in it as you. Hope you're not bitter.
Mare "Hussein" Nostrum
April 20, 2008 2:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's fine but like I said let's be fair, for example Obama and his church, He has consistently, in the past, himself referred to Wright as his spiritual adviser/mentor, One of his books was inspired by and dedicated to Wright and when asked about his church, he said once that, his church was not controversial. Then comes the videos, so first we hear that, he didn't hear any remarks, then later we hear, ok yes, he did hear some of them. Then during the Compassion Forum when talking about Wright being his adviser and mentor(which he has stated) he tries to then deny this and claims "look he was just my pastor".
I'm not bitter at all :D Just trying to make a point and play fair.
April 20, 2008 3:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
"I thought Obama just said "enough with the negative attacks"."
Oh, I see.
* If Obama doesn't hit back, he's a wimp, not "tough enough" (tough = willingness to attack negatively)
* If he does hit back, you get Otto and David Brooks saying "oh, you hypocrite!"
Nice two-faced strategy.
I'd say that sludge-wielding Hillary criticizing negative campaigning at this point is akin to Ghengis Khan decrying violence.
Oh, I forgot your other strategy: "sexism" - any hits on Hillary bring on the victim-mongering cries of how unfair everyone is on the poor wittle old wady. Remember how delicate the sensitivities were when Obama had the nerve to say she was merely 'likable enough'.
April 20, 2008 3:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama doesn't control the actions of his surrogates. Hil's surrogates have said some nasty things that she didn't agree with either. So, now we're tied. Obama has disassociated himself, and that's all we can do. Considering all that Hillary has done to twist and distort Obama's candidacy, she should be thrilled that this is the extent of Obama's "slipping up."
April 20, 2008 5:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh puh-leeze! The man is at least allowed to defend himself. She's a fright!
April 20, 2008 5:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary’s camp would like the people to just let the lies about Bosnian snipers go away.
I hope the voters don’t do this.
Hillary’s lies, comments, and jokes are insulting millions of real victims of sniper fire in conflict zones around the world.
I was thirteen in 1992, but I can still vividly remember the feeling when snipers fired around me in Bosnia during the war. This will stay clear in my mind forever, no matter how exhausted, sleep-deprived, fatigued, or tired I get.
I will never use this to promote myself nor will I lie about it.
Many of the Democratic voters are the American soldiers who put their lives in danger and don’t brag about it like Hillary (who actually lied about the experience). I hope they don’t let this go away.
SAVO HELETA
Author of "Not My Turn to Die:
Memoirs of a Broken Childhood in Bosnia"
http://savoheleta.livejournal.com
April 21, 2008 4:36 PM | Reply | Permalink