« Poll: Obama Pulling Away From Clinton Nationally | Home | Hillary Adds Two More Super-Delegates »

Obama Wins Vast Majority Of Pennsylvania Newspaper Endorsements

I'd been meaning to do this for a few days now, and this is as good a time as any. Here's the rundown of which Pennsylvania newspapers have endorsed whom...

Papers endorsing Obama:

The Philadelphia Inquirer

Citizen's Voice

The Scranton Times-Tribune

The Allentown Morning Call

The Patriot News

Bucks County Courier

Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Philadelphia Daily News


Papers endorsing Hillary:

The Daily Pennsylvanian

For what it's worth.


87 Comments

| Leave a comment

But do the editors of those newspapers wear flag pins?

user-pic

There's no way I could read the newspaper of someone who doesn't wear a flag lapel pin.

WHAT THEY WEAR

Thier white guilt and cowardice.

WHAT THEY CONCEAL

Knowing Barry can't win but being the first to tell him would be an act of courage they defer to voters.

Ask your cashier for "Change you can believe in"

user-pic

How about a little more ALLCAPS to really turn up the crazy?

Hm, but I thought Obama was out of touch with the people of Pennsylvania? I thought he hated Pennsylvania? That's what Hillary and Bill told me...

I...I so confused...

Didn't she get the Pittsburgh Tribune Review as well?

And isn't "The Daily Pannsylvanian" a student news paper? I thiought this was "non-student newspapers"?

Good point. What's up with that?

user-pic

Ah, that's the fabled journalistic balance for idiots. Even if there isn't any, one has to make an effort to create it. It's also known as equivocating cowardice and habitual hedging and weather veining.

user-pic

To be fair here, the Obama camp listed an Iowan student newspaper endorsement.......but, it was listed as one of a number of newspaper endorsements he received in that state.

user-pic

At least the PA media is paying attention, that is more than you can say for Charles (I have a crush on Rush Limbaugh) Gibson.

What about Scaife? I thought he had had a revelation that HRC was really on his side now?

Those endorsements and two quarters will get you a cup of coffee.

Yeah, back in 1964...

If you know where to a fifty cent cuppa joe, some cheap java, let the rest of us in on it...

You have a point. Both Boston papers endorsed Obama, and we know what happened there.

Did Hillary win the endorsement of the Puppet Master of "The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy" or did she just sell her soul for nothing?

user-pic

"non-student newspapers"???

If you really meant that, then Hillary Clinton would have none listed here -- the Daily Pennsylvanian is the student newspaper at the University of Pennsylvania.


I'm glad someone pointed this out. I've never, before today, seen student newspapers cited as "newspaper endorsements" before today, even from my own alma mater (and the DP is pretty damn good, as student papers go). Guess Clinton supporters really had to be reaching for this one...

for reference, Obama got all the major papers in Texas, too...

Right. They don't help much unless the candidates are unknown.

user-pic

Proof, as if you needed it, that Obama appeals only to readers & other elitists.

One more point -- that has to be a a typo above. There's absolutely no way The Patriot News supported that non-flag pin wearin' America hater.

user-pic

for what it's worth? LOL!!!!

She really needs to get out; she started out strong and she's been going downhill for quite some time now. Since she can't win, if I were her, I'd try to get out at least slightly ahead of the game.

user-pic
or reference, Obama got all the major papers in Texas, too...

Oo, thanks. I forgot all about that.

Obama won Texas! Yeah!

Wait, didn't she get the endorsement of Richard Mellon Scaife's rag?

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/04/in-canada-clint.html?cid=111268206#comment-111268206

In Canada, Clinton Co-Chair/Fundraiser Downplays Candidate's NAFTA Rhetoric
April 18, 2008 5:07 PM

At Toronto's Empire Club of Canada this week, two former US ambassadors to Canada -- one Democrat and one Republican -- debated how concerned Canadians should be that the Democratic candidates are serious about re-negotiating NAFTA.

It was the Democrat, James Blanchard, who told Canadians not to worry, according to Canadian press accounts.

Blanchard, former Governor of Michigan, is a Michigan state co-chair of Sen. Hillary Clinton's campaign, one of her major "HillRaiser" fundraisers, and served as US Ambassador to Canada during the administration of former President Bill Clinton.

Hillary Clinton has pledged to voters that she will force Canada to re-negotiate the deal or the US will opt out of it.

"I've said that I will renegotiate NAFTA, so obviously we'd have to say to Canada and Mexico that that's exactly what we're going to do," Clinton said during a recent debate. "We will opt out of NAFTA unless we renegotiate it.”

But Blanchard seemed to pooh-pooh that bold statement, telling attendees that Democrats are more concerned about China and Mexico than they are Canada.

Newspapers, a form of the media, are endorsing Obama!?!?!?!

Who would have thunk it? I always thought the media wasn't in love with Obama...or, wait...

P.S. The student newspaper cited is UPenn, and coming from an elite college student, that means more than the other papers combined.

So unless every student newspaper in the nation endorses him, Obama's grown-up newspaper endorsements count for very little? This seems like an odd perspective to adopt...

The "grown-up" media has more than proven itself to be biased in favor of Obama. I would not say the same about students, particularly those at UPenn.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/18/mccain-hamas-endorsement_n_97469.html

The smear campaign begins: McCain tries to tie Obama to Hamas

Breaking News:

Gallup daily tracking poll shows that support for
Hillary Rambo Clinton, The Heroine of Tuzla, remains rock solid among her strongest core base

No change from the last time.

Senator Obama 0%

Senator Clinton 100%

Among Short Bus Trolls,
Most likely not to be able to differentiate between their arses and their mouths.

user-pic

If Canadians don't pass and enforce environmental laws and allow their people to unionize then damn right, we're going to renegotiate their end of NAFTA or invite Quebec to become the 51st state or something. If I was president I'd do it just to drive Judy Biggert and Tom Tancredo crazy by making them think they'll have to listen to "press 3 for French" along with "press 2 for Spanish".



Are you f'ing kidding me? You think Canada competes unfairly with the US because we have lower environmental and labour laws? For real? You're not trolling?

Unbelievable. Canada has a much, much more generous social safety net, stricter labour laws, higher taxes, and (though it's difficult to compare) I'm certain tougher environmental laws as well.

Unbelievable. To us, you guys are no-holds-barred economic savages. What do fathers and mothers get as paid childcare leave in the US? Like 7 minutes? In a civilized country, it's a year. What's your minimum wage? How much vacation do you get? In a civilized country, y'all pay for universal healthcare through a moderately expensive tax system because reasonable health is a human right.

You have the gall to suggest we compete unfairly with lower labour and environmental standards? Un-fucking-believable.

The whole "renegotiate NAFTA or we'll pull out" appears to me to be a transparent bit of lowest-common-denominator pandering. There's nothing with regard to Canadian labor standards that the US would have an interest in "renegotiating", unless the US wants to bring its labor protections up to Canadian levels. I'd love to see that happen, but if the US wants to improve US labor laws, it could do so without resistance from the current right-wing, pro-trade governments of Canada and Mexico.

But it's only fair to point out that Canada's record on greenhouse gas emissions since Kyoto is slightly worse than that of the US. And Canada has oil, in the Tar Sands, and is burning a lot of diesel and natural gas to extract it. I hardly foresee a Democratic government trying to press environmental protections that would make Canadian oil (which America needs) more expensive.

The promise to renegotiate NAFTA is a red herring.Trade isn't what's hurting the US economy -- it's the ripple effect of the subprime mortgage debacle. So protectionism ain't gonna fix things in the gutted industrial heart of Pennsylvania or Ohio.

As for a 51st state, heh heh, even if Quebec wanted to join America, which it doesn't, I'd love to see the Republicans' electoral chances here once 8 million French-speaking, internationalist, unreligious social liberals were added to the voting population.

Certainly, this is "worth" enough not to bury it on a late Friday afternoon.

And, for SCMadden, who points out that "Obama got all the major papers in Texas, too": Why, yes he did. He also got a net gain of 3 to 5 delegates from Texas.

Your point is...?

user-pic
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/18/mccain-hamas-endorsement_n_97469.html

The smear campaign begins: McCain tries to tie Obama to Hamas

Incase you missed it, Hillary-Joe managed to put Rev Wright, Louis Farrakhan nad Hamas into one little sentence the other night.

See - she is a bloody damn Republican.

If you slide off that hunk of cheese a bit of air might find it's way to your brain.

ASK YOUR CASHIER FOR : "Change you can believe in"

People who read like Barack.

Hillary is just dumb!
--------------------------------------------

Hillary Clinton Attacks MoveOn
By: Jane Hamsher Friday April 18, 2008 2:30 pm


photo by Daniella Zalcman
The Huffington Post headline reads "Hillary Slams Democratic Activists." I'm being told that Hillary Clinton was caught on tape disparaging Barack Obama because he's being supported by MoveOn, and that they opposed military action in Afghanistan.

I've tried to stay out of the pie fights of late, but as a long-term defender of MoveOn and other progressive organizations -- this is completely unacceptable.

I defended Hillary Clinton when she refused to bow to right wing pressure and condemn MoveOn over the "General Betrayus" ad (and was sad when she finally capitulated). MoveOn are valuable progressive partners, who have been with us on Donna Edwards, net neutrality, trying to bring an end to the war, FISA and other issues we've been fighting for.

They've accepted the challenge of organizing the left in the virtual arena and done an amazing job that the right struggles to replicate. They now have 3 million members, of which I'm one. And their skill at online organization and movement building has developed a model that both of the Democratic candidates have been able to replicate and learn from, acting as a democratizing influence and making candidates more responsive to the public at large and less to high dollar donors.

MoveOn didn't oppose military action in Afghanistan but I did. Not because I thought it was the wrong thing to do but because I was quite certain George Bush would bungle it and we'd just wind up spending billions on a bunch of junk that would make his buddies rich and a lot of poor people in the poorest country in the world would die senselessly. And I was right.

Does Hillary Clinton not want my vote either?

Ironic, isn't it.

MoveOn.org was founded as a citizen-level response to the Republican witchhunt against Bill Clinton that led to his impeachment.

Hillary's getting old, and so are her excuses.

The Clintonistas never expressed any problems with activists, or the web, or the caucus process, until all of them looked elsewhere to pick our next Democratic Presidential nominee.

Get out some more Kleenex, Hillary! But like everything else, you ran that card into the ground.

user-pic

where can you get a cup of coffee for 50 cents?

And an odd aside: The Daily Pennsylvanian, which endorsed Clinton, is indeed the student newspaper of the University of Pennsylvania. The interesting thing about this is, the student Democrats group for the University of Pennsylvania has actually endorsed Obama!

user-pic

It is hard for me to believe that Obama can get within 10% in Pennsylvania. I hope he can but I have doubts.

wasn't moveon.org created in support of Cimton's husband, during his term?

Right. Ironic, huh, that Obama supports MO and Hillary doesn't. Somebody should remind her about the Blue Dress and the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy.

Perfect example as to why I -- despite being a long-time Hillary supporter -- am firmly in the Obama camp.

The Obama biased media is getting desperate after their hero crashed and burned in the debate and flipped off Clinton:

At the Obama post:

DEVELOPING: HILLARY SLAMS DEMOCRATIC ACTIVISTS.........

Hilarious, they laughing at you whiners and think you are stupid enough to believe anything as long as it is against the great leaders of your party.

Have they no shame?

Too funny.

Have any of these endorsements come since the debate? I know that several of those came before the debate, so they could hardly be taken as evidence of a desperate anxiety that has emerged in the wake of the debate.

Not that it makes any difference, but the Philadelphia Daily News endorsement came the morning after the debate.

hey gotaLIE
i feel your pain

user-pic

The Clap?

your heartfelt, selfless and entirely objective concern for us and our Great Party is truly touching, gotalife.

thank you.

Pittsburgh Post-Gazette is Mellon-Scaife's paper, the one Hilary sat down with in the middle of Sniper-gate, owned by one of the backers of the Arkansas Project.

The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette is NOT Scaife's paper--his is the Tribune Review. As far as I know the Trib hasn't endorsed yet.

But as several others have said, do these endorsements really mean much to the average voter?

The Post-Gazette is owned by Block Communications; they also own the Toledo Blade which endorsed Obama awhile back, although I'm not sure if it was before the Ohio primary.

LOVE the Blade. :)

You are correct. Thanks for the correction.

Greg, your bias is showing again, but I can't quite tell in which direction you're leaning this time! Please be a little clearer!

Can we just wrap this thing up already? It's D-O-N-E.

THIS IS EXCELLENT NEWS!! FOR HILLARY!!!
!!!HILLMENTUM™!!!!

user-pic

So the student newspaper endorsed Clinton!?!?!

But, didn't Bill just say the other day that young people are too stupid to pick a president?

This is amazing. Newspapers has always tended to endorse status quo candidates. Same is true for political office holders.

In this campaign they have mostly endorsed Obama. Yet Obama has consistently portrayed the Clinton as status quo, same old politics, sell outs. I never would have guessed it.

I always saw the Clintons as agents of change. Overcame extreme racial prejudice in Arkansas and effected education reform. Implemented responsible budgets in the wake of Bush and Reagan. Not easy things to do.

From the referenced McCain fundraiser e-mail:

We need change in America, but not the kind of change that wins kind words from Hamas, surrenders in Iraq and will hold unconditional talks with Iranian President Ahmadinejad.

Notice how they get "uncoditional" and "surrender" in there together? Classy.

For what it's worth? Not much

user-pic

I can understand Hillary attacking MoveOn. Afterall they have endorsed Obama after taking a vote of the membership on 2/1 where he won 70.4% of the vote. Let's face it, if Chelsea endorsed Barack she'd be out of the will and Carville would be sliming her.

"And isn't "The Daily Pannsylvanian" a student news paper? I thiought this was "non-student newspapers"?"


Yep.

This is classic MSM shilling for Hillary.

They need to keep the Hillary spirit up by "balancing" his genuine good news with fake good news for her.

Funny, that when it is reversed, they don't do that. (Still don't announce Texas caucus results, for instance)

In which after all the ballyhoo died down...he won.

I don't think this is going to matter. This thing has been over for quite some time. Imagine if we didn't have to hear about "Rev Wright" - gate; Bitter-gate; Flag Pin- gate; Obama is a Muslim-gate.

That's the main garbage that's been occupying the useless and mindless media .

May 7th...this thing will be over. The superdels will make their decision and Obama will be the nominee-apparent.

The Daily Pennsylvanian was just kidding.

haha

That issue of Daily Pennsylvanian deserves to be stolen just like they did it about 15 years ago. Supporting Hillary is so sophomoric in the worst sense of the word.

Ah thanks for the calmer and more interesting comment than my own.

As for a 51st state, heh heh, even if Quebec wanted to join America, which it doesn't, I'd love to see the Republicans' electoral chances here once 8 million French-speaking, internationalist, unreligious social liberals were added to the voting population.

You know, this is the first argument I've ever heard that would make this Quebecker want to join that barbarian nation to the south. :)

say, where is that whiny Philadelphia Gay News? They slammed Obama on their front page and then didn't endorse Hillary?

What most people know intuitively about Barack is that Barack touches our Souls, Hearts, and collective conscience. If elected he will be much beloved and be known as the People's President. We can sense that he is one of us and that we are all of us in this together. There is no you or me but we and us.. and together we must move forward and higher to a more positive place and state of mind. He leads without criticism, demonizing or anger, he leads with a clear sense of direction and purpose where we must go if we are to survive as a people both here in the U.S. and abroad. He represents and offers true change or else stay static and die.

Add to that list The Daily Review, an important local paper in Bradford County along the northern tier of the state.

http://www.zwire.com/site/index.cfm?newsid=19479975&BRD=2276&PAG=461&dept_id=465049&rfi=8

Just ask for a "senior coffee" at Burger King. It's only 49 cents here in Northern Michigan.

user-pic

It's hard to say if a newspaper endorsements translates into any votes. Readership is on life support in most towns. But it is better to have them than not. It shows one thing. Educated people that follow politics, world affairs, domestic issues, the news in general in the world seem to support Obama. In other words, the informed!

user-pic

Well, I recall that both the Harvard Crimson and Yale Daily News (ha!) endorsed Obama. (found the latter useful in one phone call).

Penn's an Ivy, and it's actually an interesting result - cuts against the grain.

Large public universities' papers get attention, too - UT Austin's paper endorsed Clinton, as I recall. The youth vote is engaged this year - why shouldn't we pay some attention to prominent colleges's newspapers's endorsements?

If you go to the front page of The Daily Pennsylvanian from the endorsement, the top story is Obama's overwhelming support in the polls from Penn students: 73% and statewide: 71%.

This is amazing. Newspapers has always tended to endorse status quo candidates. Same is true for political office holders.

... then perhaps this is not an anomaly but an indication that Obama _is_ the status quo candidate. No one was happy before November of 2006, and I'm not sure anyone thinks the Democratic majority has been able to accomplish much. I think more than 60% of the country will vote for what they believe to be _substantial_ change; being an Obama supporter, I tend to believe he is more about change than John McCain. At least McCain was able to create a perception that he was some kind of maverick; Hillary isn't even pretending to be that. My theory is this:

1) Hillary and McCain are both establishment
2) A majority of Americans have become absolutely fed up with the establishment since at least 2006
3) What's more "status quo" than everyone agreeing they want pretty much the same thing, and agreeing to this for some time now?
4) Obama, for his recent foibles (which I'd maintain don't even compare to Bosnia, $1000-to-$100,000 in two weeks of cattle trading, and Mark Penn, or the lobbyist grease all over McCain's pants, kissing the religious right's ass after calling them "agents of intolerance", his campaign's early "Hamas-link" salvo) is the status quo candidate. He looks alot like what everyone has been hoping for for the last 18 months. Bitter-gate triggered a yawn from rural Pennsylvania because, again, everyone seems to agree with the sentiment (no matter how badly he said it).

Newspapers go with the status quo candidate, and Obama is that candidate.

The editors at the Daily Pennsylvanian wear ascots and boating shoes. They are the elitists of the Ivy League. They go to college on a campus next to one of the most dangerous neighborhoods in Philly. Most of them are not residents of the state. It costs over $50,000 a year to go to Penn. They have names like Muffy and Chaz.

The editors at the Daily Pennsylvanian wear ascots and boating shoes. They are the elitists of the Ivy League. They go to college on a campus next to one of the most dangerous neighborhoods in Philly. Most of them are not residents of the state. It costs over $50,000 a year to go to Penn. They have names like Muffy and Chaz.

Wow, this is absurd. What exactly is this incredibly dangerous neighborhood? Have you actually ever been to Penn? All the neighborhoods immediately surrounding it are pretty nice, at this point. You can find bad neighborhoods not too far away, if you go west and north or down into Southwest Philly, but this is really basically bullshit, even putting aside all the ascot business, which is ridiculous.

(And I say this as a grad student at Penn, so it's not like I have any water to carry for Penn undergrads, many of whom are indeed rather ridiculously spoiled.)

The DP does, however, suck, and its endorsement of Clinton is the kind of contrarian, establishmentarian bullshit the DP editorial page specializes in. Basically, all their peers support Obama, so the DP editors endorse Clinton because obviously they're smarter than everyone else.

user-pic

Actually I would probably lean toward the fact that the former editor of the opinion section of the DP is the co-chair of "Penn for Hillary"

user-pic

Whatever. I graduated from Penn 11 years ago and I did so on scholarships and loans I'm still paying. Not everyone that goes to Penn is some trust-fund kid.

Oh, and I wrote for The Daily Pennsylvanian for four years.

Kiss my ass.

user-pic

Well of course she doesn't like MO... it defended her husband when she would have preferred to see him hanged by his genitals AND impeached.

After all, she could still be making a comeback... maybe an even better one... if her husband had been impeached and was a martyr to the Republicans.

So, you see, it all makes sense. Move On is always getting in her way... sometimes by supporting her husband, sometimes by supporting her opponents.

heh heh

"The editors at the Daily Pennsylvanian wear ascots and boating shoes. They are the elitists of the Ivy League. They go to college on a campus next to one of the most dangerous neighborhoods in Philly. Most of them are not residents of the state. It costs over $50,000 a year to go to Penn. They have names like Muffy and Chaz."

Right you are.

But who cares? It is simply not in the class of a real newspaper, I never heard of it (the paper) before today. And Greg's inclusion here is a bit childish. NYT Caucus included it as well to "balance" bad news for Hillary. (Why they don't extend the favor to Obama on bad days I don't know)

user-pic

Dude, I wrote for the Daily Pennsylvanian. It's a college daily. Why is it even listed?

Obama has bought up the press but not the voters.

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address