« Top Hillary Adviser: Richardson Privately Said Obama Is Unelectable | Home | Hillary Spokesperson: We Don't Think Obama Is Unelectable »
Obama Raises Over $40 Million In March
Here are Obama's March fundraising numbers, just out from the campaign:
Total Raised in March: More than $40 millionContributors in March: More than 442,000
First-Time Contributors in March: More than 218,000
Average Contribution: $96
Total Contributors to Date: More than 1,276,000
Advertisement















Wow! $40 milliom during a lull in the campaign.
April 3, 2008 10:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Power to the People!!!
April 3, 2008 12:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
No kidding!
Given an average donation of $96, if I were a superdelegate, I'd be pulling out my calculator to see what number comes up when I multiply 1.2 million people by $2,000 or so - the remaining amount the people who have contributed to Obama could still funnel into the campaign.
April 3, 2008 12:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
No offense, but a superdelegate would be an idiot to do that. Many, if not most of the people who have donated to Obama's campaign could not afford to give the full $2300. A lot of them have sacrificed to make a small donation.
One might as well take the amount of labor people can do in a 40 hour week and calculate how much labor they could do if they worked 24/7.
April 3, 2008 6:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
We can't possibly allow a candidate that can only pull in a measly $96 on average from contributors win the nomination, can we?
After all, who will look out for the millionaires and billionaires among us if the Dems nominate someone that carries the overwhelming support of the average American?
Won't someone think of the billionaires?
April 3, 2008 2:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Meaningless. Money? Ha! Tell me the last time that was important in an election.
No, we need to know the essential things in this campaign, Greg. Track down the Richardson story!
Personally, I am withholding my vote for either Clinton or Obama until it is determined who believes/believed Obama cannot win, when they believed it, how many times they said it, to whom, why they changed their mind, when they changed it, who had spicy chicken sandwiches for lunch, and what color Howard Ickes’ eyes are. Only then will I be able to determine who the most able candidate for President is.
Get on the horn, Greg! Track this story down!
April 3, 2008 10:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, now we know that there are 218,000 more Judas' in this country.
April 3, 2008 10:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
I gave, and I think I will give again, new month!
April 3, 2008 10:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Me too! I try to give a little bit each month. Probaby going to slow down until the GE since April is another slow month with only 1 primary.
April 3, 2008 10:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
And per Ben @ Politico - Wolfson is now saying that HRCs numbers "would be out when the filings are due, around April 20."
Safe to guess that the 20 Mil figure floating is not aligned with reality?
April 3, 2008 10:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Will she release all of her tax returns at the same time?
April 3, 2008 12:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
I donated to the ACLU.
They have done more on accountability than the whole dem party.
April 3, 2008 10:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
You should have donated to Hillary. She really needs the money.
Maybe Obama could loan her $5 mil or so.
April 3, 2008 10:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'd donate in a heartbeat to retire her campaign debt if she got out of the campaign and endorsed Obama. In a heartbeat.
April 3, 2008 11:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wall Street is giving them both millions. They don't need our money.
I rewarded the ACLU for doing the dems jobs by suing to get the Yoo memos and other documents exposing their crimes.
Not a penny for the spineless dems and will vote out incumbents.
April 3, 2008 11:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
A point you and I can agree on: dems have been spineless.
April 3, 2008 11:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wait, what? Oh, cool!
Gotalife, I have a question for you, and I mean it seriously. You are, obviously, very passionate about Hillary. And I completely agree with you that the Dems have been totally lacking in the spine department. For me, one of the reasons I haven't been crazy about Hillary is I find her a part of this, but you obviously do not. You find Congress, I'm guessing, complicit in the Bush administration by their very spinelessness, but what about Hillary makes her an exception here? Please don't insult me; I genuinely want to hear what you have to say.
April 3, 2008 11:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm imagining the sound of crickets..... :-D
Actually, I'm seriously interested too.
April 3, 2008 3:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
I became a card carrying member of the ACLU last summer! I give every month now.
April 3, 2008 12:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
I joined the ACLU for the first time in my life. Can' thank them enough.
April 3, 2008 11:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent.
Thanks.
April 3, 2008 11:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, that's a pretty stand-up point of view.
We give you a lot of grief (mostly in good fun), but I gotta commend you for this.
Good on you gotalife.
We disagree on candidates, but your heart for this country is true.
Kudos.
April 3, 2008 11:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
I still think he's a troll hoping to blunt political contributions to someplace it won't directly hurt his side in November. Too many ridiculously incendiary statements of his to shake that feeling.
ACLU is a great organization, and deserves support. But it has nothing to do with changing the political landscape this fall. I'll stick with MoveOn.org and some of the other organizations looking to elect more progressives in Washington.
April 3, 2008 1:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's double Hillary's haul of roughly $20 million - and we don't yet know what percentage of that $20 million was raised for the general election.
If the old truism that campaigns don't end, they just run out of funds is correct, this one may be winding down. Sure, $20 million is a respectable haul, but Hillary's carrying some $13 million in total debt. She may have raised enough to float her operating budget without retiring the debt, but it certainly wasn't enough to do both. My guess, actually, is that her debt will increase in her next report - and it wouldn't shock me to see her take out a further loan. There's no question that she has the wherewithall to retire these debts after the campaign has ended. But these debts are non-trivial factors in respect to her argument that she's best positioned to win in November. She's already gone back to her core donors to get maxed-out general election contributions. She still hasn't been able to develop a web-based fundraising operation that can rival Obama's - partly because his base of support is far more likely to be affluent and internet-savvy, and that same base is highly likely to be deeply alienated by a Clinton win. And the deeper the debts she accumulates now, the longer it will take her to build an advantage over McCain if she wins in August.
April 3, 2008 10:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
I keep wondering if one of the reasons she stays "in the game" is to try and get out of the hole! It's likely a losing proposition. But maybe she's got the mentality of a gambler. (or could she be hoping that they'll pay her debts as part of deal to leave?)
April 3, 2008 11:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Powerful, consistent grassroots phenomenon, poised on the threshold of changing the nature of politics - that is what the Obama campaign is demonstrating with consistently amazing fundraising totals.
April 3, 2008 10:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
I know I did my part. Word on the street is Clinton won't release her figures until April 20th. My guess is that the number and evidence of her campaign running on financial fumes would tank her Pennsylvania campaign.
April 3, 2008 10:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wow. And the tax returns are due around that time too. Could be a couple of bad news days leading into the Penn primary for Clinton.
My prediction: She wins Penn by 5-6% (netting ~5 delegates) calls it a HUGE comeback given Obama's outspending her 3 to 1, pledges to fight on, and is out before May.
April 3, 2008 10:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's said that it does sound very much like her to do just that...
April 3, 2008 12:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Tax returns are going to be out around April 20th, too. Printed in 5 pt. size with Wingdings font and translated into Swahili.
April 3, 2008 10:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ninaweza kusema kiswahili. I will translate for you. :-)
April 3, 2008 11:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
And distributed as 5th generation faxed copies that can't be deciphered until after April 22nd.
April 3, 2008 1:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Every time the Clinton Camp opens their mouths about Bill Richardson, they just reinforce the fact that he was telling the truth when he said that they were deluging him with hundreds of calls, and they were acting with a sense of entitlement, but Senator Obama just stayed in touch with Bill Richardson directly, and never tried to strong arm him.
Keep on reporting on how the Clintons are now going all out to destroy Governor Richardson's good name, and we will make sure that the Hispanic supporters of Senator Clinton are made well aware of how the Clintons will seek to destroy them if they every stray from the Clinton Plantation.
April 3, 2008 10:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well it is very clear that the Clintons are going ballistic over Richardson because he is telling the truth.
Richardson went with Obama because he recognized a genuinely nice human being in politics. That is such a rare occurence that Richardson in good conscience simply could not ignore that knowing how much backstabbing and doubledealing he encounters just to participate on the Clinton team. Richardson consistently recounts how Obama helped during the debate when he count have been totally embarassed. To Richardson a man who is your opponent who will keep you from making an ass of yourself is an individual to be admired and supportive of.
Richardson knew Obama did not have to tell him the subject of the question. But he did. That to Richardson is the truly important attribute that the Clintons can not in all their craven ambition ever overcome.
April 3, 2008 11:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wow. That is in spite of the Ohxas loss and the Wright flap. They didn't even try that hard compared to Jan/Feb. I was getting emails every other day and there were counters for this and counters for that all Jan/Feb. March there weren't really any counters on the website and I got maybe 2 emails specifically asking for cash.
If I were John McCain, I would be afraid - very afraid.
April 3, 2008 10:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
If she had raised a lot of money she'd release that news right away to let everyone know she was financially stable. This is a story they obviously do not want and so they are delaying their release. This can't be encouraging to SDs who are leaning her way.
April 3, 2008 10:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
i think Obama or some one with money should make an ad.
seen kids looking at Hillary photo Chanting.
Liar Liar
Sniper Fire
Liar Liar
Sniper Fire
by the way it is my believe that "Clintons Delanda est"
April 3, 2008 10:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Any idea how Time got this story so wrong if they were quoting sources from Obama's campaign? Deliberately misleading from Obama, poor/wrong reporting (e.g., misreading quotes), or just fabricating/embellishing by Time?
April 3, 2008 10:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
I laugh everytime i hear that obama has out raised hillary again and again and that he keeps out spenting her in every contest and yet the guy can't finish the race... lost texas primary and ohio primary where he out spent her....going to lose pennsylvania where he is out spenting her again..... its crazy.
April 3, 2008 10:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, isn't it pathetic how he keeps cutting Hillary's huge leads, sometimes even surpassing them! What a LOSER!
April 3, 2008 11:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama won the majority of Texas delegates. I wouldn't call that a 'loss'. But I forgot, in Hillaryland where everyone dodges sniper fire every day and campaign on a defecit, people see things a little differently.
April 3, 2008 11:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
He doesn't have to win every contest. He only needs to win enough contests to win the nomination. Also, closing her huge gaps has always been an important part of his campaign. She started out with much more support and name recognition.
April 3, 2008 11:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
It is a waste of money Americans are known for. ACLU or charities are a better way to donate.
April 3, 2008 11:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
I just can't seem to shake the feeling that you're a GOP troll attempting to stir trouble and blunt momentum where you can. I'm not sure why that is though.
Musta been something you said once or twice or numerous times. Go figure.
April 3, 2008 1:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree. I think he (and I assume "he") is a GOP troll. Too many right-wing talking points popping out of his mouth (this sudden ACLU interest being right out of the '88 Presidential election).
He's just here to be disruptive, to get a kick out of agitating this side of things, since he's so disappointed the best his side could do this year is McCain, whom 1/2 of the GOP just loathes. He knows crazy grandpa McCain is going down as fast or faster than Dole did in '96.
April 3, 2008 3:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
He has beat her in twice as many contests as she has beaten him. He has more delegates and more votes than she does. In every contest even the ones he looses he gains on her as the voters tune in (see recent tigtening of the polls in PA for the latest example of this phenomena). What part of this makes you optomistic about Sen Clinton's chances?
April 3, 2008 11:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Because it is a delegate race. And so for her big victory in Ohio she netted 9 delegates. And for her big Texas primary win she netted 4 delegates. Of course, he offset all of that with wins in the Texas caucus (recall that you had to vote in the primary to participate in the caucus), which resulted in a 3-5 point delegate win out of Texas. He also won Wyoming and Mississippi, netting more delegates than Clinton picked up in Ohio.
So while you focus on the varying spin metrics proffered by the Clinton campaign, I'll keep focusing on the only metric that can't be spun: pledged delegates.
April 3, 2008 11:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
I gave my usual monthly amount, will do so again this month (and the next, and the next, and the next...) When Obama wins the nod, I'll start sending to his GE campaign and to the non-DLC House or Senate candidates in the most trouble around the nation.
April 3, 2008 11:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yay! I made my first contribution last month and it was actually my first political contribution ever, as in, first ever in my life.
Yes, the man is an inspiration.
April 3, 2008 11:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Does anyone have that comment from Hillary Clinton (or paraphrase of a conversation with her) where she said she didn't believe Obama's support was real (I think they referred to it as a mirage)? If so, please repost, I want to remind myself just how delusional she is about the reality confronting her.
He's raised an astounding $130MM+ since January. That's just nuts.
April 3, 2008 11:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
The obvious needs to be repeated: Many people willing to spend their lunch money will beat the millionaires willing to spend the limit, every time.
April 3, 2008 11:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Reality Check:
Andrea Mitchell is married to Alan Greenspan.
Who did Hillary recently say that she would call on to work on improving the Economy.
Get it now.
Greg Sargent is the new Andrea Mitchell.
April 3, 2008 11:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Greg is married to Alan Greenspan?
April 3, 2008 11:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Andrea Mitchell is posing as Greg Sargent at TPM!!!
April 3, 2008 12:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
what's the matter, Eric? Cat got your tongue?
;-)
YES.
WE.
CAN.
April 3, 2008 11:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
You can't make enough of these numbers. If Hillary got the nod, let's assume that people would vote for her. But would they contribute?
I mean, I can convince myself to back her for the sake of healthcare but can I convince myself to part with my money, of which I have very little? And is my answer (probably a no) indicative of the others who are donating to Obama?
I think too much is made of who would vote for who once the dust clears. But too little is made of having the finances, and what those finances represent (strong support), to dominate the upcoming campaign.
This is partly because everyone reports Clinton's propped up numbers as fact. As everyone will later today when she ups her "20 million" march "estimate" to "25."
April 3, 2008 11:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Did I call that or what. Two hours later: TPM headline: Clinton raises "over" 20 million.
Whatever.
Enron stock soars!
April 3, 2008 4:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
April 3, 2008 11:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
40 million dollars that could be put to use against John McCain, if it weren't for Don Shexote's refusal to accept reality.
April 3, 2008 11:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
This worries me a bit. We've given quite a bit more than we'd planned to for the primaries and I honestly don't know how much we can afford to give in the general. I'm sure others are in the same boat.
April 3, 2008 11:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Meanwhile, abc news in reporting Clintons easily minted easily over 50 million dollars since they moved out of the White House. Unsurprisingly, Cayman Islands- the dump hole for tax evastions and tax frauds- features heavily.
Clintons Please release your tax returns.
April 3, 2008 11:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Evidentially they will either today or tomorrow. I guess they had to do something to blunt Obama's $40 million.
From Politico:
"She said late last week that they would be out within a week and so you can count on that," he said.
Interesting though when asked about fund raising numbers, Howard Wolfson said they:
Hmmm.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0408/Tax_returns_coming.html
April 3, 2008 12:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Last year I started pledging $20 a month to the ACLU. I upped it tp $25 this year.
I'm sure glad I did.
April 3, 2008 11:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
O and gotalife - good on you.
I mean that - that ACLU is better than the Democratic party - that's absolutely right.
April 3, 2008 11:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
ACLU rocks. But they can't elect a president.
April 3, 2008 12:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
OT, but here's a good'un: donations to DCCC spike after big HRC donors lean on pelosi.
April 3, 2008 11:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
to clarify, it was small donors who stepped up when the fat cats thereatened the speaker with witholding funds.
April 3, 2008 1:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, I just read that too. If her number could do anything to offset the boost Obama will get from this news, she would release her numbers tomorrow or early next week. That she won't release them until two days before PA votes suggests that they are pretty bleak and might send the message that she's already lost.
April 3, 2008 11:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
It took a while, but I finally talked my mom (one of the new 218,000!) into donating on March 31st. She's in her late sixties, a democrat for that last 25 years, and was a big Hillary supporter who gave her some money and voted for her in the Tenn primary. In previous conversations about donating to Obama she said she couldn't talk about it b/c it made her feel too bad. This weekend she told me she finally moving out of mourning for Hillary. But what was interesting to me was that she wasn't in mourning about the fact that Hillary is losing, but that she was crushed about, "how much like a Republican Hillary was campaigning, how nasty and mean she got." She wasn't wavering about voting for Obama in the general, but giving money to him was her final acknowledgment (to herself) that Hillary Clinton was not the candidate that she thought she was.
April 3, 2008 11:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm broke now - March 31 was matching funds day and I went broke making donations to Obama, Noriega, who is running hard to beat Cornyn, the biggest clown in Congress, (and has a shot at it,) the DCCC, and I re-upped to the EFF.
Whew
April 3, 2008 11:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent use of funds Tena. But I submit that MY congressman is the Emperor of Bozos. Tom Tancredo.
April 3, 2008 1:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
I, respectfully, disagree. You may have the single worst Representative, but I'm surrounded by idiots.
My local Representative is Darrel Issa, and my neighboring Reps are Brian Bilbray and Duncan Hunter and they vote in lock-step.
Oh...and Bilbray replaced "Duke" Cunningham.
April 3, 2008 2:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Look at those number carefully.
442 000 contributors
average contribution: $96
as one contributor can make more than one contributions, and the 442000 refers to the number of contributors rather than of contributions, the total could be significantly more than 42 000 000. maybe this is just a case of lowering expectations again before they come out with the real one.
April 3, 2008 11:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
Trying to figure out why Clinton will wait three weeks to release her numbers, I initially was overcome by the usual paranoia. Maybe she raised One Billion Dollars! (Cue Dr. Evil pinkie) But then it dawned on me that if she were flush, she'd be bombarding the airwaves with ads, especially considering how her political life depends on wracking up huge wins. But if Obama's outspending her 3-1, he's probably outraising her by a similar amount, which means Hillary Nation may not have stepped up like she needed. The drumbeat grows louder.
April 3, 2008 11:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
The $40 million raised by Obama does not matter. No Metric where Hillary looses matter. If you only count the $20 million that Hillary raised, you will see very clearly that Hillary raised the most amount of money and that she's # 1! What planet do you live in? Don't you know that only Hillary matters. When you discount everything else Hillary is really winning this.
Hillary for Hillary 2008!
April 3, 2008 11:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well enough about donations - where's the tax return????????
April 3, 2008 12:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Tena, make that tax returnS. It will take examining the Clinton tax returns from 2000 forward [none of which have been released] to understand the facts behind the Clintons' outsized income jump from nearly broke to $50,000,000 since Bill left office.
April 3, 2008 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
THIS IS GREAT NEWS!!! FOR HILLARY!!!
April 3, 2008 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Barack Obama has the best fundraising operation American politics has ever seen.
Think about the breadth of that statement. Remember it when anyone tries to make the "He can't win" argument.
April 3, 2008 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
clintoni delenda est.
(sorry, latin classes die hard.)
April 3, 2008 12:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think Obama's ability to raise money has to be a big positive for the super-delegates.
On a personal level - I've never seen anything like this in my life. I have been an Obama supporter since he had nothing but an exploratory committee; my first donation was to that. Over the past fifteen months I've given small donations whenever I could, usually once a month or so.
This is the genius of Obama's campaign - everyone feels like they matter, that their small donation, whatever it is, counts. And that's because, of course, it does: millions of small donations toward one goal. It's a movement I feel privileged to be part of.
April 3, 2008 12:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Tena, make that tax returnS
Yes, you're right of course. I said it right on another thread - I lose my head once in awhile and right now it hasn't quite floated back to my body - but I shouldn't talk about my recreational habits online.
LOL!
April 3, 2008 12:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary is Obama's BFF!!!
The longer she stays in the race, the more money he raises!
The longer she stays in the race, the longer the GOP has to wait to find out who their 527 target is!
The longer she stays in the race, the greater the enthusiasm of Obama's grassroots organizers in states that haven't had primaries yet!
The longer she stays in the race, the longer Obama has to polish his campaign skills!
The longer she stays in the race, the longer McCain has to wait to find out who his opponent is, and the longer he has to sit off to the side spinning Grandpa Simpson stories!
Yeah Hillary!!! The more she tries to knee-cap Obama, the stronger he gets!
Obama-wan Kenobi Lives!!!
April 3, 2008 12:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Help us Obama-Wan, you're our only hope!
April 3, 2008 1:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
XD I love that nickname!
April 4, 2008 8:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
OHX - You're exactly right! I keep telling my fellow Obama supporters the extended campaign is great: the Dems get all the press, and all the negative stuff gets vetted early. By the time fall rolls around, the MSM with it's never-ending search for for new dirty laundry will have no choice but to focus it's attention on the long-ignored McCain. Seriously, Clinton isn't doing anything the R's wouldn't do - and more - so this is a great warm-up for Obama. Gotta go... time to send another check!
April 3, 2008 5:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Cool. Think I'll give some more.
April 3, 2008 1:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
OBAMA IS GOD!
Hillary and Co. keep talking about how weak Obama is, how he can't make it all the way...etc.
The facts are:
1) More people voted for him!
2) More activists caucused for him!
2) More Delegates were awarded to him!
3) More States voted for him
4) More money was raised by/for him!
5) The people LOVE him, and they show it every day!
6) More big names endorse him! Every day, every day!
Someone tell the MONSTER please:
THEY FUCKING HATE YOU!
April 3, 2008 1:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yay for Obama! I was one of those small first-timers. $50 in March. My first-ever donation to a presidential campaign.
Obama is changing the way politics gets done in the country.
April 3, 2008 1:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Correction: Barack Obama raised $55 million in February, according to Obama house organ Huffington Post. So at $40 million for March, he's actually off more than 25% from the previous month. Anyone know how much was primary and how much was GE?
April 3, 2008 1:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
LMAO. He outraised HRC 2:1 but he was off 25%, so he's clearly in trouble?
April 3, 2008 2:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Unbought and Unbossed" might be the title of Shirley Chisholm's book and the slogan for her 1972 campaign, but when you can raise this kind of money from this many donors at this small per-person contribution rate, surely it applies more than ever to Barack Obama.
April 3, 2008 2:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama is kicking Hillary's behind at ">Donor's Choose too.
April 3, 2008 2:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Hillary campaign was expecting to lose in March so this does not matter. Before Obama entered the picture Hillary was raising more money. Only funds raised before Obama entered the campaign count. Nothing favorable to Obama counts, as this is all about Hillary.
Hillary for Hillary 2008!
April 3, 2008 6:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Like Nixon before him, Obama is being successfully marketed to voters. The Glitzkrieg will continue with growing force. It would be interesting to have the exact cash layout per vote.
Axelrod believes in "stories" rather than "record". It was logical for him to pick Obama, a person who has less of a record behind him. But whatever the glossy cover previews, it's only by previous record that you'll have an idea of what's really in store for us.
Don't let yourselves get axel-railroaded into the wrong choice. Look at the economy, war vs. peace, Gay rights, civil rights during the Clinton years. We need to get back on track, to have a no-nonsense person in the White House who'll roll up her sleeves and get the job done.
Resist the Glitz.
April 3, 2008 8:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
If you want record, Nixon had years of it. We see where that got him.
April 4, 2008 9:00 AM | Reply | Permalink