Obama Pokes Fun At Hillary's Shot-And-A-Beer

Camp Obama's push-back on Hillary's criticism of his "small town" remarks continues this morning -- in a speech before the Alliance for American Manufacturing in Pittsburgh, he again acknowledges error, but also gently mocks Hillary's efforts to appeal to working class voters this weekend by tossing back a shot...

Now it may be that I chose my words badly. It wasn't the first time and it won't be the last. But when I hear my opponents, both of whom have spent decades in Washington, saying I'm out of touch, it's time to cut through their rhetoric and look at the reality.

After all, you've heard this kind of rhetoric before. Around election time, the candidates can't do enough for you. They'll promise you anything, give you a long list of proposals and even come around, with TV crews in tow, to throw back a shot and a beer.

But if those same candidates are taking millions of dollars in contributions from the PACs and lobbyists, ask yourself, who are they going to be toasting once the election is over?

In addition to trying to re-frame the battle over this as an argument over whether Americans are "bitter" or not, poking fun at Hillary for this sort of staged politicking is a key component of Team Obama's push-back on the "small town" brouhaha (though Obama did some similar politicking in a bowling alley).

Full text of his prepared remarks after the jump.

Late Update: Clinton spokesperson Phil Singer responds:

With all due respect, this is the same politician who spent six days posing for clichéd camera shots that included bowling gutterballs, walking around a sports bar, feeding a baby cow, and buying a ham at the Philly market (albeit one that cost $99.99 a pound). Sen. Obama's speeches won't hide his condescending views of Americans living in small towns."
Being here in Pennsylvania with the primary coming up, I know that politics is what's on a lot of people's minds. But as I look out at this crowd, I also know that being here isn't just about politics for me. It's personal. Because it reminds me why I entered public service in the first place.

As some of you might know, after college, I went to work as a community organizer for a group of churches on the South Side of Chicago. The job was to help lift communities that had been devastated when the local steel plants fell on hard times. Thousands of folks had been laid off and some plants were closing down. And I can still remember the first time I saw a shuttered steel mill.

It was late in the afternoon and I took a drive with another organizer over to the old Wisconsin Steel plant on the southeast side of Chicago. Some of you may know it. And as we drove up, I saw a sight that's probably familiar to some of you. I saw a plant that was empty and rusty. And behind a chain-link fence, I saw weeds sprouting up through the concrete, and an old mangy cat running around. And I thought about all the good jobs it used to provide, and all the kids who used to work there in the summer to make some extra money for college.

What I came to understand was that when a plant shuts down, it's not just the workers who pay a price, it's the whole community. I saw folks who felt like their government wasn't looking out for them and who had given up hope. So I worked with unions and the city government, and we brought the community together to fight for its common future. We gave job-training to the jobless and hope to the hopeless, and block by block, we helped turn those neighborhoods around.

More than twenty years later, as I've traveled across Pennsylvania, and West Virginia, and Ohio, and all across this country, I'm still seeing too many places where plants have closed down and where folks are feeling like they're not getting a fair shot at life, like their dreams are slipping further out of reach. And that's partly because of the same kinds of global economic pressures that led steel plants in Chicago to close down in the 1980s.

But it's also because George Bush has pursued policies that don't work for working Americans. In recent years, we've seen more than 3 million high-quality manufacturing jobs disappear, and more than 40,000 factories close down. And more often than not, the few jobs that are being created pay less than the ones we're losing and come without health insurance or a pension, which makes it even harder for families to feel secure about their future.

But we also know this is a problem that goes beyond the failures of George Bush - because for decades, through both Democratic and Republican administrations, we've seen the number of American-owned steel companies dwindle down. For decades, our economic policies have been written to pump up a corporate bottom line, rather than promote what's right, without any consideration for the burden we all bear when workers are abused or the environment is destroyed.

It's an outrage, but it's not an accident - because corporate lobbyists in Washington are writing our laws and putting their clients' interests ahead of what's fair for the American people. The men and women you represent haven't been getting a seat at the table when trade agreements are being negotiated, or tax policies are being written, or health care and pension laws are being designed because the special interests have bought every chair.

That's not the America I believe in. That's not the America you believe in. And that's why when I'm President, we'll make sure Washington serves nobody's interests but the people's.

You know, there's been a lot of talk in this campaign lately about who's "in touch" with the workers of Pennsylvania. Senator Clinton and Senator McCain are singing from the same hymn book, saying that I'm "out of touch" - an "elitist" - because I said a lot of folks are bitter about their economic circumstances.

Now it may be that I chose my words badly. It wasn't the first time and it won't be the last. But when I hear my opponents, both of whom have spent decades in Washington, saying I'm out of touch, it's time to cut through their rhetoric and look at the reality.

After all, you've heard this kind of rhetoric before. Around election time, the candidates can't do enough for you. They'll "promise you anything, give you a long list of proposals and even come around, with TV crews in tow, to throw back a shot and a beer.

But if those same candidates are taking millions of dollars in contributions from the PACs and lobbyists, ask yourself, who are they going to be toasting once the election is over?

I'm the only candidate who doesn't take money from corporate PACs and lobbyists, and I'm here to tell you that you can count on me to stand up for you after this election, just as I've been standing up for workers all my life. That's why I'm running for President of the United States.

Senator Clinton and Senator McCain question my respect for the workers of Pennsylvania. Well, let me tell you how I believe you demonstrate your respect. You do it by telling the truth and keeping your word, so folks can know that where you stand today is where you'll stand tomorrow.

The truth is, trade is here to stay. We live in a global economy. For America's future to be as bright as our past, we have to compete. We have to win.

Not every job that has left is coming back. And not every job lost is due to trade -automation has made plants more efficient so they can make the same amount of steel with few workers. These are the realities.

I also don't oppose all trade deals. I voted for two of them because they have the worker and environmental agreements I believe in. Some of you disagreed with me on this but I did what I thought was right.

That's the truth. But let me tell you what else I believe in:

For America to win, American workers have to win, too. If CEO pay keeps rising, while the standard of living for their workers continues to decline, that's not a win for America.

That's why I opposed NAFTA, it's why I opposed CAFTA, and it's why I said any trade agreement I would support had to contain real, enforceable standards for workers.

That's why I believe the Permanent Normalized Trade agreement with China didn't do enough to ensure fairness and compliance.

Now, you can have a debate about whether my position is right or wrong. But here's what you can't do. You can't spend the better part of two decades campaigning for NAFTA and PNTR for China, and then come here to Pennsylvania, and tell the steelworkers you've been with them all along. You can't say you are opposed to the Columbia Trade deal, while your key strategist is working for the Columbian government to get the deal passed.

That's not respect. That's just more of the same old Washington politics. And we can't afford more of the same.

We need real change, and that's what I'm offering. I'm offering a new, more transparent and more inclusive path on trade so we can help promote an integrated global economy where the costs and benefits are distributed more equitably. And it starts with a principle I've always believed in - that trade should work for all Americans.

That's why we need to finally confront the issue of trade with China. As I've said before, America and the world can benefit from trade with China. But trade with China will only be good for you if China itself plays by the rules and acts as a positive force for balanced world growth.

Seeing the living standards of the Chinese people improve is a good thing - good because we want a stable China, and good because China can be a powerful market for American exports. But too often, China has been competing in ways that are tilting the playing field.

It's not just that China is following the path taken by so many other countries before it, and dumping goods into our market while not opening their own markets, something I've spoken out against. It's not just that they're violating intellectual property rights. They're also grossly undervaluing their currency, and giving their goods yet another unfair advantage. Each year they've had the chance, the Bush administration has failed to do anything about this. That's unacceptable. That's why I co-sponsored the Currency Exchange Rate Oversight Reform Act. And that's why as President, I'll use all the diplomatic avenues open to me to insist that China stop manipulating its currency.

We also have to make sure that whatever goods we're importing are safe for our families. We all saw the harm that was caused by lead toys from China that were reaching our store shelves. A few months ago, when I called for a ban on any toys that have more than a trace amount of lead, an official at China's foreign ministry said I was being "unobjective, unreasonable, and unfair." But I don't think protecting our children is "unreasonable" - I think it's our obligation as parents and as Americans.

When it comes to trade, there's no one-size-fits-all approach. If countries are committed to reciprocity, if they are abiding by basic rules of the road, then we should welcome trade. Many poor countries need access to our markets and pose no threat to our workers.

But what all trade agreements I negotiate as President will have in common is that they'll all put American workers first. We won't ignore violence against union organizers in Columbia, or the non-tariff barriers that keep U.S. cars out of South Korea.

And we won't just negotiate fair trade agreements, we'll make sure they're being fully enforced. George Bush has been far too slow to press American rights. That's an outrage. When our trading partners sign an agreement with the Obama administration, you can trust that we'll hold them to it.

Now, if we're serious about standing up for American workers around the world, we also have to fight for you here at home. That means passing universal health care and making sure every American has insurance you can take with you even if you lose your job, and that a college degree is within reach, even if you're not rich - because all our children should have the skills to compete in the global economy.

And it also means protecting the rights of our workers. It's time we had a President who didn't choke saying the word "union." We need to strengthen our unions by letting them do what they do best - organize our workers. If a majority of workers want a union, they should get a union, no matter whether they're full-time, or part-time, or contract workers. And that is why I will fight for and why I intend to sign the Employee Free Choice Act when it lands on my desk in the White House.

Here's what else I'll do: we'll pass the Patriot Employer Act that I've been working on since I got to the Senate - so we can stop giving tax breaks to companies that ship jobs overseas, and start giving them to companies that create good jobs with decent wages here in America.

And to those who think that the decline in American manufacturing is inevitable; or that manufacturing has no place in a 21st century economy; we say right here and right now that the fight for manufacturing's future is the fight for America's future. And that's why we'll modernize our steel industry, strengthen our entire domestic manufacturing base, and open as many markets as we can to American manufactured goods when I'm President.

We'll also make necessary long-term investments in job-growth. Back in the 1950's, Americans were put to work building the Interstate Highway system and that helped expand the middle class in this country. We need to show the same kind of leadership today. That's why I've called for a National Infrastructure Reinvestment Bank that will invest $60 billion over ten years and generate millions of new jobs. We can't keep standing by while our roads and bridges and airports crumble and decay. We can't keep running our economy on debt. For our economy, our safety, and our workers, we have to rebuild America.

And we need to invest in green technology. We can't keep sending billions of dollars to foreign nations because of our addiction to oil. We should be investing in American companies that invest in American-manufactured solar panels and windmills, and in clean coal technology. That's why I've proposed investing $150 billion over the next ten years in the green energy sector. This will create up to five million new American jobs - and those are jobs that pay well and can't be outsourced. That's a promise that we are making not just to this generation of Americans, but to the next generation of Americans. And that's why this will be a priority in my administration.

Now, I know some will say we can't afford all this. But let me just say this - if we can spend $10 billion a month rebuilding Iraq, we can spend $15 billion a year in our own country to put Americans back to work and strengthen the long-term competitiveness of our economy.

So make no mistake - the American people have a choice in this election. We can talk about our economic problems with trade all we want, but unless we change the broken system in Washington, nothing else is going to change. We can talk all we want about respecting workers and their way of life, but unless we have a President you can trust to listen and put working Americans first, nothing is really going to change.

And you can trust me. Because politics didn't lead me to working folks; working folks led me to politics. I was standing with American workers on the streets of Chicago twenty years ago, and the reason I'm here today is because I don't want to wake up one day many years from now and see that our companies are still getting hurt because foreign governments are still bending or breaking the rules, or that we're still standing idly by while American jobs get shipped overseas, or that we still haven't made the investments in infrastructure and in training our workers that we desperately need.

The reason I'm here today is because I know what it's like to go to college on student loans, and see a mother get sick and worry that maybe she can't pay the bills. I know what it's like to have to scratch and work and claw to build a better life for your family. And I don't want to wake up many years from now and find that the American dream is still out of reach for too many Americans.

The reason I'm here today is because I believe that if we can just put an end to the politics of division and distraction, and reclaim that sense that we all have a stake in each other, that we rise and fall as one nation; if we can just unite this country around a common purpose - black, white, Hispanic, Asian, and Native American; labor and management; Democrats, Republicans, and Independents - there's no obstacle we cannot overcome, no destiny we cannot fulfill.

That's the fundamental truth I learned on the streets of Chicago. That's the idea at the heart of your Alliance for Manufacturing. And that's the opportunity we have in this election. There is a moment in the life of every generation where that spirit of unity and hopefulness has to come through if we're going to make our mark on history. This is our moment. This is our time. And if you will march with me, and organize with me, if you vote for me, then I promise you this: We will not just win this Democratic Nomination, we will win the general election and then together - you and I - we're going to change this country, and we're going to change this world. Thank you.


Comments (251)

avatar

Let's face it, Hillary is Annie Oakley, or rather, Calamity Jane, who likes to tell tale tales while riding a giant bull with Paul Bunyan under sniper fire.

She's beating his ass.
It must hurt.

avatar

haha. totally. obamabots, it's over for you. walk away.

avatar

Okee, today's Gallup Tracking Poll has Obama up ten points! Eat crap.

avatar

I thought Hillary looked and sounded hung-over at the Compassion Forum last night. She needs to quit the hard drinking.

avatar

Now if she called him a name she'd be a racist.


http://hinessight.com/

this is priceless.

How is saying that someone is talking LIKE she's Annie Oakley name-calling?

Are you people honestly not understanding what is said or are you actively looking to misconstrue everything you hear to your political advantage?

The education system has truly let us down if people refuse to read an entire statement and understand that much of what is said in latter paragraphs is modified by what is said earlier paragraphs.

It's no so much as people being truly outraged as it is people being beaten politically looking to tell people to be outraged.

How well this works will depend upon the voters and who they decide to believe.

avatar

So, comparing him to Jesse Jackson wouldn't be an insult anymore?

I love this new tack because it gets at the heart of hypocrisy of the identity politics Republicans (and in this case, one desperate Democrat) have played.

avatar

nah. you're just upset obama can pop out another speech to fix this one. it's over for him.

avatar

You are right. It is over for him and it is over for her, too. Because, mathematically speaking, this thing is done. Better get used to the sound of "Candidate Obama".

Will he win? Who knows. I only know he has a better chance at being president that the hard drinking, gun shootin' bullet dodging "homegirl" from Winnetka!

avatar

you realize that your comment makes no sense, right (due do grammatical errors)?

avatar

Obama, once again, responds to Hillary's Rove-like attack with eloquence and poise. Imagine a politician who can do that?

The desperation out Camp Clinton is reaching absurdity. I mean, won't those "shots and a beer" affect her shooting skills when she nails her next duck?

Here's hoping the folks of PA get wise to the Clinton hypocrisy and pandering and put us all out of our misery on April 22.

Eric
www.changeany1thing.com

avatar

Huh? What planet are you living on? He attacked her square on. Take those rose colored glasses off.

avatar

Eloquence and poise? LOL!

I think the Clinton camp's response nails him very well on his hypocrisy. As if Obama doesn't pose for photo opps!?

In addition to trying to re-frame the battle over this as an argument over whether Americans are "bitter" or not, poking fun at Hillary for this sort of staged politicking is a key component of Team Obama's push-back on the "small town" brouhaha (though Obama did some similar politicking in a bowling alley).


I really don't think going bowling is the same as presenting yourself as a gun-toting whiskey drinker.

Unless you suck at bowling more than your opponent sucks at gun toting and whiskey drinking...

avatar

In that case it's clearly different.

avatar

Absolutely. Obama was certainly not pretending to be a bowler. His gutter balls proved that. He was being himself. Big difference between that and the shot-and-beer and gun talk pretense.

"I remember when my daddy taught me to bowl on his private bowling alley at our summer cottage..."

Big difference from the gun. Less different from the whiskey.

avatar

nah. according to msnbc, clinton frequently has red wine or beer with staffers and reporters. so STFU.

avatar

Wine is one thing. Plainly, she can't handle her whiskey. It's a common enough affliction.

avatar

Considering how DEAD Shrillery's campaign is, it's surprising she's not drinking in public even more.

avatar

I have a dream, that one day our politicians won't have to apologize for being intelligent and insightful and that one day honesty won't be considered a gaffe.

Is that too much to ask?

Is that too much to ask?

That question just shows how elitist and (to channel little Billy Kristol from today's Times)how Marxist y'all are.

Exactly! Kristol's beyond self-parody at this point.

Oh my god, that pissed me off so much! I normally read through Kristol to rebut him in my head, but I just skipped him today when I saw that title.

It shouldn't be, for a serious country. I remain steadfastly hopeful that one day, we'll live in that country again.

Again?

avatar

from the perspective of a resident of an area where we can (literally) pick off the deer from our back porches, one must agree with Senator Obama. Real hunters know never to mix their booze and guns -- even metaphorically.

I'm not usually one to accuse any of the bloggers at my favorite website of any bias, but that completely unnecessary parenthetical was a little curious, Greg. I don't recall many (if any) of your posts which have reiterated Team Hillary's talking points randomly tossing in an aside that undercuts whatever argument they happen to be making. Seems to me this might be the type of thing that gets one (correctly, in this instance) accused of a pro-Hillary bias...

Where is my next "shot" ?

avatar

Great pic!

Thanks. I actually stole it from a site Callimaco posted in one of today's blogs.

http://img393.imageshack.us/img393/451/hillthemightyhunterjq3.jpg

What the hell is with that headline, TPM? The guy gives a long, substantive speech - and the headline's about him ribbing her about throwing one back? Come on, guys.


I have a dream, that one day our politicians won't have to apologize for being intelligent and insightful and that one day honesty won't be considered a gaffe.

I hope not, cause I share your dream. That's why I am so mad at her now. What she is belittling is a major issue - maybe the most major issue at the heart of our problems.

She's going to make it very difficult for us to address this problem, which is key.

And she's finally pushed me over the edge to the point where I hate her guts for this. Not the attack on Obama, as much as the direct attack on truth. Just exactly like a Republican.


Come on out, Hill - we got some Reposado Gold, a box o buck shot and a tri tip on the grill. Kablammo!

Hahahahahaha. I'm loving it. Keep digging grrrrl.

avatar

Wait, politicians pander? What a stunning new development.

And one other thing: the Clinton campaign is giving McCain tons of ammunition with this. As usual. But for Phil Singer to zip out something about Obama "posing" is just over the top.

Two words for Phil: sniper fire.

I look forward to Obama handling this on Wednesday with the grace and eloquence that he has demonstrated in the past.

And note to the Clinton campaign: handing out "I'm not bitter" stickers is too funny for words. "Bitter" and "Hillary Clinton" are three words you don't want appearing together.

Did someone say bitter ? Me loves "bitters". Gimme some and let's go huntin' and shootin'.

avatar

I fell out laughing when I learned Clinton had handed out "I'm not bitter" bumper stickers.

So typical--she starts off with a nice pounce on his comments, then it all spirals out of control into overplayed cheeseballville. What could be more defensive and tin-eared than an "I'm not bitter" bumper sticker?

Sheesh. Next, "I'm not irrelevant" bumper stickers.

And note to the Clinton campaign: handing out "I'm not bitter" stickers is too funny for words. "Bitter" and "Hillary Clinton" are three words you don't want appearing together.

LOL!!!!!

No shit.

avatar

Slate:

"Poor wording was not the problem; on the contrary, it was his precision that was so unfortunate, and his ability to pack half a dozen unintended insults into a single sentence uncanny."


http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/04/13/the-worst-thing-i-ve-heard-obama-say.aspx

Richmond, you should post your whole comment from that Slate column. Here. I'll do it for you. The words of Richmond:

All states that could go Blue in November.

All states with some combo of traditonal-values Christians, gun owners, and economically hurting voters.

See, like it or not, these people get to vote and they do vote and they could go Democratic.

Mr. Hope and Dreams keeps on like this, and he'll be holding John McCain's coat at the inauguration.

Mrs. Clinton--we know what she is, who she is, etc., her gaffes don't surprise or enlighten. People like her ANYWAY. This just GALLS the Obama campaign. How can people like her? Who cares? They DO.

Everytime Obama or his wife opens the yap and departs from the script, Democrats lose 10-20K votes.

Nice going.

I found this: People like her ANYWAY to be particularly interesting. And just one question: then why has she been behind since February?


avatar

being behind doesn't mean people don't 'like her anyway'.

being neck and neck (even if behind, and even if far enough behind to not ever catch up) is the proof that people like her anyway.

Actually, I would have thought that her sky-high negatives would have suggested that people *don't* "like her anyway."

LOL @ Singer

This is really ALL they have to go on and nothing else. What a sad time for the Clinton camp.

avatar

Politics didn't lead me to working folks; working folks led me to politics.

That should be B.O's tagline in an ad the next week or so.

I am bothered by him being down 20 now to HRC in a poll that just came out today by ARG. They were tied a little over a week ago. Now he's down 20??!! WTF?

avatar

Relax, its ARG. I don't beleive their polls when they show it in Barack's favor either.

and his ability to pack half a dozen unintended insults into a single sentence uncanny."

Can someone kindly explain to me how the truth is an insult? This is ridiculous.

Bill Clinton used to say the same damn thing Obama has said. The same thing - because it is a major issue - books have been written about it.

It's true and I hate the Clintons for trying to make it seem not true when it's so damn important.

I just hate them now.

avatar

H-T-X

An explanation from Slate:

Here's what preceded the problem sentence:

You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, and like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing's replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate, and they have not.

With this, who could argue? So far, so good. But then, straight into the ditch:

"So it's not surprising then that they get bitter,'' (Angry, OK, but bitter? I don't think I've ever heard anyone describe someone they liked that way.)

"they cling to guns'' (If they had jobs, maybe they wouldn't be gun nuts?)

"or religion'' (Or religious nuts, either? This is an especially weird conclusion since Obama himself is a devout Christian; was he pandering to the segment of the party that does see believers that way?)

"or antipathy to people who aren't like them'' (So no wonder such a lot of them are haters?)

"or anti-immigrant sentiment'' (Who blame their troubles on people who'll live in concrete-block squalor while picking fruit for next to nothing.)

"or anti-trade sentiment'' (And don't see the big picture on globalization and free trade like you Davos-goers do.)

"as a way to explain their frustrations.'' (In lieu of a Harvard Law degree.)

avatar

Today's Rasmusen daily tracking poll:
Obama 48
Clinton 44
Yesterday:
Clinton 46
Obama 45

Yesterday, Gallup's daily tracking poll showed a two point gain to 50-41 for Barack after a full day of "bittergate", including 54-40 poling on saturday.

avatar

Sorry, but isn't BO's self-realization the same thing he did with his speech on "race"? It was something truthful but something people felt uncomfortable about.

In this instance, he supposedly puts down working class whites because of guns, gays and god. Ummm, yeah. Can't we talk about this, or is the reason we can't becuase the people that he's talking about/too don't understand what he's saying? Ooops, there I go being all elitist again.

"Rejuvenated Hillary Clinton strolls small-town Pennsylvania;

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton took a stroll on Sunday, but the crowds lining the sidewalks and jamming the porches of a blue-collar neighborhood in Pennsylvania made it anything but casual. A crowd of several hundred people lined the street in Scranton to see Clinton. One resident held a sign that read "Small Towns Need You."

http://bp1.blogger.com/_UQPUzwdX51o/SAGBAm9YsPI/AAAAAAAAAHU/qtpQt3Gntao/s1600-h/r-HILLARY-DRINKING-huge1.jpg

Obama's divisive rhetoric shows his hope and unity message is bs and he is just another lying politician.

filed for future ownage.

Gotalife, you are brilliant. Acting like you're praising Hillary and then posting a link to her doing her shots of Crown Royal. Once again, you show that you have the heart of a true Obama supporter.

There is a profound lesson to be taken from Orangejuicegate, or Bowlinggate, or Bittergate, and that lesson is that the guardians of our discourse are, at heart, idiots. There is no other explanation or redemption. Anyone attempting to draw out character definition from a glass of orange juice is, at heart, someone who has entirely run out of insightful things to say. Anyone attempting to make the case that a bowling score represents the measure of a man deserves to be basted, roasted, and served to whatever imbecile of a president does manage to rise to the top of their addled internal scoresheet.

http://dailykos.com/

Word to your mother.

avatar

Gutter-balls? What was that with Hillary's bowling on Ellen?

"Cartoonist finds that Obama has mastered the Jedi mind trick over his cultist followers and NBC News/MSNBC":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3_jh2dO78U

They are laughing at you .

Hilarious.

Likewise.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=uHVEDq6RVXc

Hilarious, indeed.

Love the video, a truly accurate representation of Obama cultists.

Not condescending in the least, thanks. Heaven forbid I support a different candidate, or Soft-Freez here will call me a name! Crikey!

Soft-Freeze has revealed he is a Republican troll. Best not to feed him.

Wow.

Comparing Obama to a Jedi Master. Hmmm.

Maybe not the best way to insult a candidate?

But, it's funny. It is. I liked it.

Especially the part about Bill Clinton not inhaling.

or wait, was that a different movie?

If Obama is the Jedi, doesn't that make Hillary and McCain the Sith? And, if so, which one's the master and who's the apprentice.

Obama must get saddle sores from riding on his high horse so much. Here he is strikeing back at Hillary and McCain for allegedly politicizing his words!! Hmmm, then he might try not politicizing their words, either.

Continuing on his beloved steed, he says of them that around election time they'll "promise you anything, give you a long list of proposals and even come around, with TV crews in tow, to throw back a shot and a beer." And of course Obama doesn't do any of this himself. No promises or proposals or TV crews following him around at all.

avatar

That's great Gotalife. And when HRC wins PA and gets slaughtered in NC and loses IN, we'll all thank you for your own high-minded comedy.

Obama must get saddle sores from riding on his high horse so much. Here he is strikeing back at Hillary and McCain for allegedly politicizing his words!! Hmmm, then he might try not politicizing their words, either.

Do you even think before you post? Hillary and McCain on one side of this vs. Obama on the other? So you prefer the Republicans over Obama?

Good going.

I prefer the truth. Novel idea, I know. Even if Bush himself ever says anything true, I'll be glad to admit he's right.

I add up the score to see who's right the most and who's wrong the most, and vote accordingly. Also take into account whether the guy/gal seems like a fair, honest and open-minded thinker. I'm that most dangerous of creatures, an independent voter.

This isn't the official Obama website, is it? If it is, then TPM must have redirected me there.

Obama is the most truthful politician out there.

No punchline, that's it.

No he's not. He's just a more artful liar than the other two.

Does Barack Obama even know what a duck blind is? He hardly strikes me as the rod and gun club type himself.

He certainly isn't a rod and gun club type. Then again, he's not portraying himself as one either.

I was referring to this:

"She's running around talking about how this is an insult to sportsmen, how she values the Second Amendment, she's talking like she's Annie Oakley! Hillary Clinton's out there like she's on the duck blind every Sunday, she's packin' a six shooter! C'mon! She knows better. That's some politics being played by Hillary Clinton. I want to see that picture of her out there in the duck blinds."

-- Sen. Barack Obama, quoted by ABC News.

I know what you were referring to. I think it's a hilarious line.

What's your point?


(I don't mean for that last line to sound snarky. I'm genuinely asking, but that's just how it comes off.)

Oh, it's a hilarious line, all right. I can just see Barack Obama all decked out in Brooks Brothers cammo, bowling bag in hand...

But that's exactly my point. He's never portrayed himself as a "rod and gun club type" or a master bowler. Yes, he went bowling during his tour of PA, but he sucked! He didn't try and lie about his bowling experience ("I remember my daddy buying me my first ball when I was just a kid").

Does Barack Obama even know what a duck blind is? He hardly strikes me as the rod and gun club type himself.

And this matters because...?

Didn't you know that in order to be elected President, you have to shoot defenseless animals for sport? Bonus points if it's on a private range.

How many points for a lawyer (Dick Cheney's preference)?

That'll score you about 150, last I checked.

See above. (Apologies for the missing context.)

Oops. Replied to the wrong comment. Let's try that again.

See above. (And apologies for the missing context.)

haha, what are you doing?!

Greg, why isn't the Annie Oakley passage in the transcript?

Come on...

No one has done more for small towns than Barack Obama.