« Geoffrey Garin: Obama's Small-Town Comments Would Damage Him In General Election -- And Super-Dels Should Consider Them | Home | Clinton: My Dad Taught Me How To Shoot »
Obama: "I Deeply Regret" Offending Anyone
Barack Obama now says that "I deeply regret" offending anyone who might have been offended by the phrasing of his words about small-town values and economic frustrations, a step back from his more forceful rebuttal to his critics yesterday
From an interview with the Winston-Salem Journal:
"Well look, if there - obviously, if I worded things in a way that made people offended, I deeply regret that. But the underlying truth of what I said remains, which is simply that people who have seen their way of life upended because of economic distress are frustrated and rightfully so. And I hear it all the time when I visit these communities. People say they feel as if nobody is paying attention or listening to them and that is something - that is one of the reasons I am running for president. I saw this when I first started off as a community organizer and the steel plants had closed, and I was working with churches in communities that had fallen on hard times. And they felt angry and frustrated."
Advertisement















Clinton praises the voters and will fight for them to give them hope for their future.
Her economic policies will do just that.
Obama calls them bitter and disrespects them in front of a elitist group of large donors in S.F.
Then refuses to apologize.
This is a trend and the real Obama.
He will lose PA by 20 and the supers will go to Clinton.
Then we will unite to crush mcwar and get our country back in the right direction.
Lets not lose three in a row, lets win our country back.
April 12, 2008 6:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah and you have never been wrong before.
April 12, 2008 6:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
How much do you get paid for being an absolute a$$? Or do you do it just out of unconTROLLable compulsion?
Not that it matters, since you will turn off even those voters who might be undecided at this point. Apparently your momma forgot to teach you how to be nice.
April 12, 2008 6:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bitter?
Who's Bitter?
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/04/12/BU4K1045IR.DTL
Not Hill, not Bill with that 800K they scooped up from Columbia
Mark Penn, he's not bitter. McCain, couldn't be happier to stay in Iraq for 100 years.
Out of touch? OUT OF TOUCH?!
April 12, 2008 7:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
I would be a whole lot more enthusiastic to support her should she get the nomination in November if she (and you) didn't keep complimenting the Republican party vs. Obama.
We might want different quarterbacks, but we're on the same damn team.
April 12, 2008 7:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
CNN: Clinton Out of Touch
You're goddamn right we're bitter
Somebody tell Tuzla
She thinks we're "OPTIMISTIC"!
Yup. That's what she said
WATCH
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4G8dRMofHNs
April 12, 2008 7:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
We've got a debate this week.
I can't wait.
That woman's got alot to answer for.
April 12, 2008 7:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Too bad you can't be up there with them, man. Obama has only begun to regret his remark. But you know, he's not saying anything I don't hear day in and day out around here.
April 12, 2008 8:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're another child. You think this thing is sewed up while we're still in phase one. Obama and Clinton still have many many rivers to cross and McCain is just beginning to pull toward the center, so be careful what you wish for. Unless of course you're down with someone even the Republicans don't want. Maybe you are. Maybe you're one of the 26% of Clinton supporters who'd rather have no health insurance at all and no change in Iraq. If so, there's nothing more to say.
April 12, 2008 10:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Clinton praises her voters and dismisses all the others as 'not important' or 'not informed'.
Much like she praises the states she's won as the 'most important in a general election' and dismisses the states Obama has won as 'not relevant to the general election'.
Politics is the art of emphasizing what isn't said.
April 12, 2008 9:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jake Tapper: Obamaphobia
Congressional Republicans, Afraid of Obama, Throw Hail Mary Pass to Try to Keep Him From Nomination
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/04/nrcc-continues.h
Desperate is as desperate does.
Time to put the Last Dog down
April 12, 2008 9:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let's wake the hell up and realize that Hillary has hoodwinked you into thinking she's a Democrat and that she gives a damn about what you want.
April 12, 2008 10:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
GREAT NEWS, So if Clinton wins by less than 20%, then really she lost and should get out.
April 13, 2008 10:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
by sunday night he will be reborn in a fundamentalist southern church, git him a gun and begin shooting animals
i cannot wait to see the further deprecations falling on the obama does all right all the time, he won, they always lose cause we say so bunch...first the back up obama then he says he mispoke now he is apologizing if he hurt anyones feelings
can a full frontal hangout mea culpa be avoided now? and how will the obama supporters recover from the whiplash suffered trying to keep up with obamas quickly form shaping explanation
like ricky said to lucy though: obama you got some splainin to do
April 12, 2008 6:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
He's done all the explaining he needs to do. He's clarified his terms.
The argument remains the same, and he's going to keep making it.
April 12, 2008 6:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, I do want to congratulate all you Republican trolls for having such a fine supporter as the Goldwater Gal. She's got the talking points. She's got the spin. She can play gutter ball with the best Rovian or Nixonian. When it comes to dirty tricks that gal's on her way to reaching Cheney level! Only she had the moxie to turn the DLC from Republican lite to Republican on steroids.
April 12, 2008 6:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
this is hilarious, obama makes an unforced, dumb error, and then, shockingly, when clinton uses it politically, she is a horrible, horrible person
it was not hillarys fault obama was stupid, please quit acting like grade schoolers, your guy screwed up, he understands that, he is suffering permanent damage from it, and your tantrums towards clinton bear no resemblence to any real point whatsoever
try to focus
April 12, 2008 7:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama didn't say anything that bothered me. As NBC said, it might make people think that he doesn't embrace conservative values. Well, duh!
Just wish old Hillie Billie would gitalong over to the REAGAN Democrat party where she belongs. Git out that 6 shooter Hill and some cowboy boots and one of those big belt buckles for your jeans and strike an Annie Oakley pose. You've almost got Dubya down pat.
April 12, 2008 7:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
He should have said he was up at 11 PM, dodging Bosnian sniper fire.
I wonder if Senator Clinton will ever regret sending 4,000 soldiers to their deaths for a lie she bought hook, line, and sinker.
April 12, 2008 6:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama is dead nuts on with this. He is 100% right. The reason I think this issue reinforces his candidacy is that he is articulating what happens in every day life and how government has to be responsive to that. People don't feel they can count on the government so we count on each other. What happens is people like Karl Rove, Dick Cheney, George Bush, and Bill and Hillary Clinton come along and stir our mistrust into fear of others or certain issues to get votes.
The reason Washington is worked up is that he has distilled every single person in that town down to a 3-4 sentence explanation. But he has also called every politician who's electorate feels they're under performing out on the carpet. So mayors, governors, etc. who have a populace who is upset with the state of their city/state, are also getting in to this as Obama just indicted them too.
http://www.politicalinaction.com
April 12, 2008 6:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey...did you hear we're at war and its costing us a shit ton of money? Also, the economy is in the shitter and people are losing their homes and their jobs and college is outrageously expensive and a lot of students are having difficulty paying off their debt.
But wait, whats that you say? Obama used an inelegant phrase at a fundraising rally in SF last weekend? Damn, never mind everything i mentioned before, lets spend days talking about this.
April 12, 2008 6:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
What inelegant phrase? These people do hang onto those things they can hang onto with all their might -- to their religious values, their sense of right and wrong, and the piss poor jobs that are left for them. If they didn't "cling" the way they do, nobody would've been able to manipulate their votes on wedge issues for the past thirty years. But they can be manipulated because they've just lost too much and they dont' want to lose anymore and that's only human. So if Sen. Clinton or Sen. McCain or these people themselves really think that recognizing this reality is somehow demeaning and insulting, it's beyond absurd. They're tilting at windmills.
April 12, 2008 10:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
... "But they can be manipulated because they've just lost too much and they dont' want to lose anymore and that's only human" . . .
Precisely! This is the condition our present corporate masters want us in; desperate enough and pliable enough to be spoon fed pap as gospel. All this dates back aeons. It's business as usual. Progressive History has been the tale of victories hard fought over precisely this condition. Everything from the Magna Carta to WWII (very partial subset) were devices to stem and turn back this form of political manipulation.
We had an opportunity after the 'fall of communism' to capitalize on the Peace Dividend. Efforts to do so alarmed the Military Industrial Complex and their various corporate sycophants who took steps to reverse the tide with lobbyists, legislation and many well-placed wars and police-actions on civilian populations. It's all been spelled out very succinctly in George Orwell's, "1984." Orwell wrote that book after his experiences with WWII where he had been engaged in countering Nazi propaganda via the BBC.
Unfortunately the M.I.C. & sycophants have absorbed (misappropriated) the Peace Dividend and placed the Nation in a downward spiral at the alter of short-term gain. Quarterly profits trump the Constitution and the Elevation of Mankind every time in an unregulated market economy.
So, the question becomes, "What in Hell are we going to do about it before these psychotic conditions bring that Hell I referred to here to Earth?
April 13, 2008 11:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
WOW - Fathoms
... "But they can be manipulated
That is the best most concise explanation of what has been happening.
So dam good I made a copy of it to send to my friends. Of course giving you the credit!!!
Thanks for describing it so well - esp the part about neocons freaking out over the fall of Soviet and the Peacetime rewards.
I think also they did not like the Hi-Tec Silicon Valley success - I think they conspired to dump tons of money into stocks, and all pull out at once, causing the bubble to burst.
They like making money the old fashioned way - Oil and Military.
April 13, 2008 5:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Senator Empty Suit is a phony. What BS! What is the job description of a community organizer? Drugs on the corner, girl scout cookies, urban renewal, Reverend Wright and Louis Farrakhan awards and trips to Libya, a three week holiday to Pakistan that is conveniently not mentioned in two books until the passport records get compromised? Senator Empty Suit, this bitterness will go on for weeks and even into November should the Dems be so stupid as to nominate you, THE Empty Suit.
I await another explanation, quasi-apology tomorrow, and Monday and Tuesday.
April 12, 2008 6:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Your twin makes more sense than you.
That is all.
Continue trolling.
April 12, 2008 7:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
I await another explanation, quasi-apology tomorrow, and Monday and Tuesday.
Others will await the safe return of their loved ones from Iraq, thanks to Hillary's gullibility and botched leadership.
April 12, 2008 7:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
OBG!!
ROTFLMAO!
You are so beautiful!
April 12, 2008 7:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Commenting on your avatar.
April 12, 2008 7:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just today i shopping and a old person noticed my pin (i always have a obama pin on, the Irish one to be exact). The jist of what she said was that if Obama gets elected he wont change anything since none of them ever do.
April 12, 2008 6:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
And then what happened?
April 12, 2008 7:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Phrased exactly correctly..."Well look, if there - obviously, if I worded things in a way that made people offended, I deeply regret that. But the underlying truth of what I said remains, which is simply that people who have seen their way of life upended because of economic distress are frustrated and rightfully so."
No apologies needed for the underlying idea; an expression of regret if anyone was offended by the way it was worded.
But it won't stop the Hillarybots or campaign from continuing to flog it until Obama is forced to point out the hypocrisy of a couple of multi-millionaires talking about him being "elitist". You can count on that.
April 12, 2008 7:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Has anyone heard from people in rural Penn or Indiana on this?
Anyone talked with voters who recently lost jobs at a factory?
If so, are they exuberant? Are they happy, as Sen. Clinton would suggest? Are they really optimistic? Were they 'rolling up their sleeves' when you talked to them? That's Clinton's solution to their woes.
Obama was right on this. And I hope the voters in PA and Indiana don't let the ignorant, lazy press (who appear to be doing nothing but repeating Hillary talking points) sway them on this issue.
April 12, 2008 7:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, I'd like to hear from a few people who are actually, you know, working-class residents of Pennsylvania and Indiana.
April 12, 2008 7:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Uh, no you don't. I just checked in on the message boards of the newspaper at my old rural southwestern PA hometown, and, well, you don't want to know.
April 12, 2008 9:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
yeah , i'm sure they are thrilled to know that a presidential candidate has just branded them as not so enlightened enough which is why they cling to religion, xenophobia and guns.
specially pointing out the small town people separately is what makes his comment so bad, it just makes them look like they are bunch of regressive people.
April 12, 2008 7:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry. That's not what he said at all.
April 12, 2008 8:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Report from the Lehigh Valley from an expatriot living on the S.F. Bay:
My family back in PA. appear to be split on this.
I going through comments on articles about Obama (pro & con) the tide measures out to approximately 2-1 in favor of Obama.
There's nothing scientific about this. I'm just reporting what I'm seeing. As for myself, I'm a fiscally conservative, civil-libertarian progressive who's going to go to the polls and hold his nose while voting against McCain. Neither of the Dem presumptives impress me all that much. Of them both I see Obama as the lesser of two evils
April 13, 2008 12:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
What's this guy's problem? What in the world is there to be bitter or frustrated about? We've got a great war going on right now in Iraq, the economy is growing by leaps and bounds, we live in complete peace-of-mind that we won't be attacked by terrorists, the environment is pristine, and our jobs are secure. What this country really needs is not Obama, but eight more years of Bush.
http://mrsensible.com/
April 12, 2008 7:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is all a part of the script.
Hillary will continue to throw everything at him that she can in hopes that it sticks.
But we all know which state she will will and which states he will.
The superdelegates don't want to over turn the will of the people and Obama has won more delegates (and states and probably votes.)
Some superdelegates don't want to declare their support for either candidate because they don't want to offend any of their supporters. So, they sit quietly hoping that enough other superdelegates support Obama so they don't have to speak up.
Obama working to put this issue behind him -- good! And in the process he just might bring a number of rural dems to his side because he is speaking the truth -- rural communities have been neglected.
April 12, 2008 7:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
I've got a really horrible feeling about this. The fact that Barry is making these apologetic noises suggests to me that he feels it too.
April 12, 2008 7:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
His asshole is puckering.
April 12, 2008 8:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
I really don't mind the trolls. The Republicans are totally predictable and we are all used to their slimey campaigns. But I won't ever forgive Clinton for her ruthless perseverence in trying to turn Democrats into Republicans and for trying to drive new voters out of the party. Any country claiming to call itself a democracy needs to have contested elections and a free exchange of ideas. How else do we defeat bad ideas and embrace new good ones? Instead, we have Clinton driving home every worn out wedge from the Pat Buchanan Karl Rove playbook.
April 12, 2008 7:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
They might be trolls if this were an Obama site. Fact is, it's not. People who don't like Obama get to come here and express their opinions about him and about Clinton. If you still think they are trolls and that this is "your" site, ignore them. That's what you do with trolls. Don't feed them. Ignore them.
April 12, 2008 8:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's really unnecessary.
April 12, 2008 10:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama: "People say they feel as if nobody is paying attention"
Clinton isn't.
McCain isn't
We are
April 12, 2008 7:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
One should always know what Obama's friends think of him. Some are really funny.
Super Happy Obama Fun Time Videos
http://redstate.com/stories/archived/super_happy_obama_fun_time_videos
April 12, 2008 7:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
This Marginal Player Arse Troll has been posting the same Red State Archived spam all over. I expect he is doing so from his Aryan Nation compound.
April 12, 2008 8:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Eric, I think the headline here is out of context and in that sense inappropriate.
""Well look, if there - obviously, if I worded things in a way that made people offended, I deeply regret that. But the underlying truth of what I said remains, which is simply that people who have seen their way of life upended because of economic distress are frustrated and rightfully so."
That sounds like he was asked about people being offended and he conceded the point.
But his message is the same. A one sentence answer ending with a "but" is not backing down from a spirited defense.
Not a "step back" at all. I wonder why you present it that way. Waaaaaay to much parsing of Obama's words. Meanwhile McCain can use the c-word about his wife and you give him a pass.
April 12, 2008 7:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Observer is correct. There was no apology. The caption is incorrect.
Ironically, had there been an unequivocal apology (and not a limp, inside the beltway non-apology apology), the story would begin to run its course. I am confident that Obama's advisers, in their frantic conference calls, concluded that Obama must fall on his sword for "misspeaking" and try to change the subject back to "change."
April 13, 2008 11:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
Could we discuss the NAFTA and Columbian trade issues - that's a lot more important than this subject. What Obama said is true.
You people pushing this are just so desperate to find ANYTHING to attach him with.
If you can't win on your own merits -- you don't deserve to win.
April 12, 2008 7:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
What bitterness? No, seriously, that's an old canard. Bitterness is a figment of some sick imaginations belonging to all those liberals, all them latte drinking, élites. Everyone is very happy and untroubled in Hillary's and John McWarmonger's America. Seriously.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjnvSQuv-H4
McWarmonger/Clinton
Unity 08
(Three CIC's on Day One!)
April 12, 2008 7:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wish I could do video editing. I'd love to have that song played as a soundtrack over newspaper clipping on the troubles of Pennsylvania with Hillary's and McCain's "upbeat" statements sprinkled in.
Hmm... btw Hillary's YouTube comments are no longer available. You think that someone is starting to catch on about the potential blowback from this.
April 12, 2008 8:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
I too wish I had video editing capabilities. The things I could do with that song…
Oh well.
Have they removed the youtube? I don’t know but you attribute way too much sense to the Penn-addled Clinton campaign. I suspect that they are too busy celebrating the fact that in the midst of all the Bitterness Brouhaha we missed the real BS -- McCain and Hillary Clinton silently and without scrutiny passing the Elite-ness Test.
April 13, 2008 2:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
So Obama said he was sorry if he offended anyone but then said that his statement was nonetheless true. He then proceeded to pretty much repeat what he said, giving a little more explanation.
And this is a "step back" how exactly?
April 12, 2008 7:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Eric Kleefeld
Weasel-in-waiting
April 12, 2008 7:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Karl Rove's entire approach to politics is based on the cynical exploitation of the bitterness and alienation Obama rightly mentions.
With respect to bitterness, Obama's simply stating the obvious - and should fire back strongly with examples of how operatives - especially Rove - have used the very real phenomenon of working class alienation as a political lever.
April 12, 2008 7:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Obama calls them bitter and disrespects them in front of a elitist group of large donors in S.F."
Hold on- we have Democrats speaking derisively of "San Francisco Democrats" now? Who the hell are you people, and what are you doing in my party?
April 12, 2008 7:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, snap! I knew she had to get the gay bashing worked in there somewhere since she'd already wrapped herself in the God and guns.
April 12, 2008 7:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good question.
April 12, 2008 10:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
I just returned from canvassing in a middle-to-lower-middle class neighborhood just outside of Pittsburgh. It was not altogether fun - an 82-year-old gentleman told me he would vote for neither the "jive n*g*er" or the "f**king bitch." (Bitter?? Who's bitter?) A middle-aged white woman said that Obama had just said that all Pennsylvanians are stupid and don't have jobs. Everyone else was rather polite, but hard-core Obama supporters were hard to find. Back out tomorrow, we'll see what happens.
I agree with kaspian - I have a real bad feeling about this remark. Pittsburghers in general are very defensive about their city and their attitudes, and I'm certain this defensiveness will extend to their feelings about their state (except Philly - if Obama wants to win Pittsburgh, he should just say the Flyers suck).
Why is Rendell quiet so far? They must be saving him for their big PA Hicks for Hillary rally.
I thought I couldn't get more disgusted with Hillary Clinton. My naivete, obviously.
April 12, 2008 7:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
ambs,
Your comment about "PA hicks" is kind of odd as you claim to be in PA to help Obama. Then again, I guess you are just spouting the party line.
Matthew
http://www.TheIndependentView.com
April 12, 2008 7:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nice avatar, leroyS
April 12, 2008 7:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
I live in a small town. He hit the nail right on the head.
The only controversy is in the technicalities of how he said it versus what he meant. I knew what he meant, but so many people get all bent out of shape and they want to bitch about what it sounded like he said as opposed to what it means.
At some point in time, people learn that they have to accept things spoken which is true even if it was politically incorrect to talk about.
April 12, 2008 7:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you for your generosity of spirit, and intelligence.
April 12, 2008 10:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
This headline represents yet more biased and inaccurate reporting. Obama expresses his sincere apologies that people were offended by the remarks - not that the remarks were in any way untrue. Honestly, those taking offense are reacting in large part to what others, such as Clinton and McCain, told them Obama said. They told people the words were demeaning, therefore they must be. (Wrong!)
You bet people are bitter. We work longer hours, for less pay when you factor in inflation and lack of pay raises, pay more for food, housing, health care etc. As a single mother my expenses with two children left at home have outpaced my expenses when all three were still with me. I work twice as many hours, and we do NOT buy extra items or live on credit. My family hangs on by my left pinky nail, and no matter how much harder I work and persevere, it gets more difficult by the day. That said, I conisder us blessed as there are so very many families far worse than us. I don't understand how that is possible in our country, but know it to be true. Bitter, toward my government, you'd better believe it. Almost given up that any politician honestly intends to work toward a solution? Uh, I'm 40, so hell yes!! Until now, that is, becasue someone's come along who isn't scared to tell the truth, and says it even when it isn't politically expedient to do so.
April 12, 2008 7:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama doesn't get it. "...if I worded things in a way that made people offended, I deeply regret that. But the underlying truth of what I said remains..."
The underlying truth... that Obama can go to San Francisco and as part of his fundraising spiel trash small town America accusing them of clinging "to guns or religion or antipathy toward people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."
It is no surprise that he noted some people are offended but did not apologize. He doesn't get it. Worse, from his perspective, what does he want them to do? Give up their religion? Give up their guns? And his accusation that they cling to "antipathy toward people who aren't like them" clearly paints small town America as racist. He confuses likely anti-illegal immigrant sentiment with broad anti-immigrant sentiment which no one can say exists anywhere in America, a nation of immigrants. Finally, his criticism of possible anti-trade sentiment is a bit odd since Obama has previously campaigned against NAFTA, though his back channel talks with Canadian officials leaves some question about his real views.
While it is easy to see a lot of gotchas, which even I'll admit this is one, as a turning point in the campaign, I truly think this one will be. Obama twisted this Friday night to make it sound like something very different from his original comment, then Saturday morning offers that his words were ill chosen. Now he says folks are offended, which he regrets, but out of some form of arrogance says his comments were truthful.
Truthful? Now would be a good time for Obama to take a serious look in the mirror. He is not a new voice of change. He is simply a divisive politician using hate and racism as campaign tools.
Matthew
http://www.TheProblemWithObama.com
April 12, 2008 7:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
"The underlying truth... that Obama can go to San Francisco and as part of his fundraising spiel trash small town America accusing them of clinging ..."
No, Matthew, you don't get it. What have the driving issues the last several campaigns been? Gun rights, gay marriage, religion, etc. It isn't that these are non issues, they simply do NOT represent the PRIORITY issues. Do you honestly believe our economy reached where it is in just the last few years? We've been on this path for decades, and as small town American's attempt to voice frustration over the inability to care for one's family; old-school, insider politicians distract us with these highly charged, emotional issues. 'No!'they say, "These are the issues that need concern you, if you elect *them* they'll vote for what YOU don't want! Trust me, we all want to change the economy - we promise, but what about this ..." I admit it, I got sick of voting for the guy who swore they'd change the economy, fix the schools, etc. If I couldn't fix that, I couldn't live with the emotinal angst, so I got invovled, I fought for our 'rights'. So let's be clear, if small town America can look at all that and say, yep those are distractions, what's really important is we can't survive - then Obama didn't trash us, he honored us by telling the truth.
April 12, 2008 8:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
About Philadelphia: according to Time's Swampland blog, Obama has refused to provide "walking around money" to his organizers. It's a Philly tradition -- also a NJ one, I think -- to flood neighborhoods with $20 bills to get out the vote. It's unorthodox, to say the least, to eschew this system. I give him credit for taking the high road -- indeed, if he provided the money, that would hardly have been consistent with his message -- but I can't imagine it can have anything but a negative effect in one of the areas where he has to win big.
April 12, 2008 7:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good on Obama for breaking with such a corrosive tradition. For years, "walking around money" has benefitted a few high-profile people in minority communities, and once the vote was turned out, the official elected in part because of paying out the walking around money has considered his debt to the community paid in advance.
April 12, 2008 7:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
There we go with San Francisco again.
April 12, 2008 7:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Clinton has taken a fundamental non-issue to a level that she cannot sustain; McCain's echoes will not help her or him. This one will boomerang on her as most others; if she continues it will be similar to Bosnia.
Most of the remaining primary states are significantly populated by rural and small town folk; they understand:"But the underlying truth of what I said remains, which is simply that people who have seen their way of life upended because of economic distress are frustrated and rightfully so."
Obama's call on rural and small town America is correct. If any, few of these folks are cave dwellers nor are especially favorable to Clinton; they do remember Bush, Chaney, & Rove as well of many of their own being killed and maimed in Iraq.
The Clinton Delusional Tour continues.....
April 12, 2008 7:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Honestly, those taking offense are reacting in large part to what others, such as Clinton and McCain, told them Obama said. They told people the words were demeaning, therefore they must be."
It's called fake outrage.
I wonder how long Politico/Huffpo/ABC/CNN and all the other bottomfeeders can keep up it up. Won't voters notice that they have a fake "gaffe" of out of context garbage eac and every week?
Meanwhile they don't talk about, say, torture, recession, housing crisis, Iraq, Afghanistan, global warming, etc. etc.
I think the media needs greater scrutiny, because it has become one big attack machine. But TPM doesn't seem to want to play a critical role towards other media.
April 12, 2008 7:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
billy joel
allentown
Well we're living here in Allentown
And they're closing all the factories down
Out in Bethlehem they're killing time
Filling out forms
Standing in line.
Well our fathers fought the Second World War
Spent their weekends on the Jersey Shore
Met our mothers at the USO
Asked them to dance
Danced with them slow
And we're living here in Allentown.
But the restlessness was handed down
And it's getting very hard to staaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay
aaaaaaah aaahhhhh ooooooooh ooooooh ohhhhhhh.
Well we're waiting here in Allentown
For the Pennsylvania we never found
For the promises our teachers gave
If we worked hard
If we behaved.
So the graduations hang on the wall
But they never really helped us at all
No they never taught us what was real
Iron and coke,
Chromium steel.
And we're waiting here in Allentown.
But they've taken all the coal from the ground
And the union people crawled awaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah aaaaaaaaaaah aaaaaah.
Every child had a pretty good shot
To get at least as far as their old man got.
Something happened on the way to that place
They threw an American flag in our face, oh oh oh.
Well I'm living here in Allentown
And it's hard to keep a good man down.
But I won't be getting up today
And it's getting very hard to stay.
And we're living here in Allentown.
April 12, 2008 8:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
There's a name for what Clinton is doing. It's called "molehill politics". Making issues out of non-issues distracts voters from real issues, and enables the politician to run an essentially substance free campaign. Kind of ironic, isn't it?
April 12, 2008 8:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just read MSNBC looks like this one is already fading. I mean how serious can it be when the mighty Drudge took it down?
April 12, 2008 8:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
"The jist of what she said" does not tell us what she said. It tells us what you wished she had said. Sounds like she is bitter. Sound familiar to you, at all!
April 12, 2008 8:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
CNN has the earlier clip of lambasting Clinton and now they want to make an issue out of it...very odd
April 12, 2008 8:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama made a rookie mistake saying exactly how he feels. Every day that passes Obama gets cockier. His confidence grows at a rate directly inverse to the facts. The most recent whopper occurred during a fundraiser in San Francisco while answering a question concerning potential VP choices. Never one to believe in the conventional wisdom that he needs someone with strong foreign policy experience, Obama pooh poohed the obvious right away. Obama: No Need For Foreign Policy Help From V.P. because of course he lived in Indonesia from the time he was 6 until he was 10 years old. Now I realize he is a bright lad, but a 10 year old child's experiences aren't exactly the deep life affirming and defining experiences that I typically look for in a Commander in Chief. And if they were such deep life changing experiences just why is it that he decided to suddenly abandon his mother in Indonesia to join his "typical white person" grandmother in Hawaii? And since he has done so well in life, why is it that his family is impoverished and living in huts in small villages while he lives comfortably in a mansion in a large city? What does that say about his character? His generosity? His morality?
April 12, 2008 8:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm pretty sure your list of questions says more about you than it does about Obama.
April 12, 2008 8:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
JennOfArk, do not waste your time blogging, I am sure there is a woman out there in your neck of the woods who has not been called a F*cking Wh*re yet today. Make sure you bring a lot of Obama supporters with you so they can have a good laugh and cheer like crazy. Maybe you can find an elderly Hillary supporter to slime, I am sure it will make you all very happpy, as you have no class.
April 12, 2008 8:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
"...I am sure there is a woman out there in your neck of the woods who has not been called a F*cking Wh*re yet today."
Hmmmm, really, I fail to see that whatever my sexual habits might or might not be have anything whatsoever to do with my observation that your "questions" say more about your poverty of spirit than they do about anything Obama has done.
Maybe you can find an elderly Hillary supporter to slime
Again, it's hardly "sliming" anyone to point out their pettiness. If you don't like it when people point out that you're petty, stop being petty.
April 12, 2008 10:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
You offer some interesting points that are worthy of more discussion because as we learn more about Obama, the more his character and, yes, generosity and morality, come into question.
Ah, JennOfArk, you are so correct. At least dembillc realizes that these need to be discussed. Is your head-in-the-sand or do you so lack in character that you can't see that these are legitimate questions?
Matthew
http://www.TheProblemWithObama.com
April 12, 2008 8:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Aryan Nation Weaver returns with his same old hate message. Tell us all about how much you hate Jews, Blacks, and Gay people. You have posted lots of it on your own blogs. Why are trying to pass yourself off here as something other than the hate filled bigot that you have revealed yourself to be on your own blogs!
April 12, 2008 8:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
dembillc has never posted anything remotely approaching "legitimate"
April 12, 2008 11:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good point.
April 12, 2008 9:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
OMG! Call the news corps!
Dembilic, gotalife and Weaver agree! A first!
April 12, 2008 9:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Slime a HRC fan? You mean ones that link to Fox news and Red state? Yep damn right I will, those two organizations are malevolent disgusting ffers and peddling their crap deserves nothing but contempt.
April 12, 2008 8:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Billy Glayd:
You trying to turn me on?
April 12, 2008 8:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
That is absolutely the best comeback I've encountered on TPM! Really a smile, man.
April 12, 2008 8:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
A little off topic here but I would like to point out something that is happening here in N. California. Obama won the congressional district currently held my Mike Thompson, a vigorous Hillary supporter. A convention is being held on Sunday (tomorrow) to pick the Obama delegates. It looks like the Hillary campaign is running their own stealth delegates in this convention. The election is for 4 delegates. There seems to be over 40 Obama supporters running for those 4 positions. Hillary's people, including Mike Thompson, is running a very small number. It seems possible for the 4 Obama delegates to come out of this convention will actually be Hillary supporters. Remember folks, they are only required to vote for Obama on the first round. If Obama does not have 50 +1 per cent after the first round these people are free to vote for Hillary.
This is her strategy. Prevent Obama from having a a clear majority after one round. Then win in later rounds. These local delegate conventions are very difficult for a grass roots campaign to overcome in the face of a well organized professional political machine that exists here in California. In spite of Pelosi's positive statements, the Democratic political machine here in California is Hillary country.
April 12, 2008 8:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
If Pelosi keeps pissing people off, it's going to be Sheehan country.
April 12, 2008 8:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
I thought everone is convinced, me included, that Pelosi is an Obama supporter. Anyway, good strategic planning on Clinton's part!
Matthew
http://www.TheProblemWithObama.com
April 12, 2008 9:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
You'd think it was a good strategic move if Clinton framed Obama for murder charges.
April 12, 2008 9:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Axelrod: Obama Regrets But Won't Apologize For His Remarks.
Huge mistake.
Terrible advice but the damage is done.
Keep talking and digging Obama.
Lets get to know you better.
Of course, I never bought his bs but his supporters still buy it.
April 12, 2008 9:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
He did apologize for offending people, you twat. Watch the Values forum tomorrow on CNN. He'll mop the floor with Hillary and McCain at the same time.
April 12, 2008 9:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Every report I've read says he regrets, not that he apologizes--BIG difference. If you have a quote otherwise, please do share.
Matthew
http://www.TheProblemWithObama.com
April 12, 2008 9:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
You don't usually apologize for choice of words, do you? Unless you call somebody a demeaning term.
The fact that he wasn't precise in his wording such that it couldn't be taken wrongly out of context is a pretty high standard to hold him to.
The people at the fundraiser know what he meant. You know what he meant. Some people are being TOLD what he meant, and that's his mistake - that his words can be misused.
That's a regrettable fact, but he did not set out to insult anybody, so apologizing for something he didn't say is kind of a lot to ask, don't you think?
April 12, 2008 9:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary's campaign is running stealth delagates in the Obama convention caucus ? And she's not a whore ?
April 12, 2008 9:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama they will throw all the S*** at ya...They have nothing else...Most republican voters know nothing other than wedge issues and vote that way...Maybe Obama has connected the truth but, the majority of them only follow...The truth is worth nothing to them they will sale out there country for spying-torture-lies-money-War and claim they support the troops . Yes, there were a number of Democratic votes for Bush in 2004 in Philadelphia and I say the same to them.
April 12, 2008 9:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Mark Penn works for both McCain and Clinton?
http://www.dailykos.com/comments/2008/4/12/182217/466/?pid=60#c115
April 12, 2008 9:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Pissed off? Didn't you get the memo, Billy Glib? The Pantsuited Princess decreed that nobody's pissed off. Dems everywhere are joyous and content!
The sky will open!
Choirs of angels will sing!
Aaaah... SNIPERS!
April 12, 2008 9:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Do you really need to use a KKK avatar?! This is incredibly offensive and inappropriate. I'm not sure what statement you are trying to make with it but, speaking for myself, as long as you want to advertise yourself with a blatant symbol of hate, anything you might say will be ignored.
Matthew
http://www.TheIndependentView.com
April 12, 2008 9:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Someone who's kidnapped a hedgehog and is using it as a hairpiece shouldn't criticize others. Let your toupee go back to its family in the woods and I will remove Marginal Player's hood.
April 12, 2008 9:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
I bet you live in Eldorado Texas.
April 12, 2008 10:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Are you all not aware that LeroyS' avatar is a direct parody of Marginal Player? Well, it is.
If you will note, LeroyS's verbiage is directly opposed to Marginal Player's racist rants.
LeroyS is running a parody here.
Lighten up.
April 13, 2008 2:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
OMG did you hear Obama went to visit a friend in Pakistan?!! What a lying deceptive empty suit nutjob! How anti-American! He has, like, zero substance!!
April 12, 2008 9:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama is 100% correct in his original statement and should not have apologized at all. Small town, rural America is being bamboozled by Republicans. They think their interests are in keeping gays from marrying, being "saved" from responsible gun laws in the city, and keeping Hispanics out of their towns. I teach in a small town and see the bitterness everyday in their kids and their high rate of out of wedlock births, alcoholism, drug use, and general disregard for authority.
April 12, 2008 9:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
OBAMA wont get my VOTE...IM ALWAYS A HILLARY CLINTON SUPPORTER...HE IS SUCH A FAKE
1. "TYPICAL WHITE PEOPLE"
2. HIS OWN PASTOR..HOW CAN he will be a president with his own pastor saying that
3. He doesnt has any EXPIRENECE to become COMENDAR IN CHIEF..
he doesnt do anything good ...helping community as hillary clinton
go to www.hillaryclinton.com you will see how good she is..
she is a great leader..8 years first lady, 8 year senator...and traveled alot of country...
btw... OBOMA ....
LAST THING: did you guys know that he wont pull troops home..one of his advisor said he just saying that to get campaign going...SO NOT BRING TROOPS HOME ...HILLARY CLINTON IS THE ONLY ONE
April 12, 2008 9:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just go to www.witty1isthefunniestTPMposterever.com to see just how witty I am, you will see how witty I is.
Citing oneself as a supporting source of oneself is so very Bush.
April 12, 2008 10:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here is a Charlie Rose interview with Obama from November 2004.
They discuss What's Wrong with Kansas - and Obama explicitly discusses hunting for camaraderie & tradition and church as a comfort while living with economic insecurity.
Fast-forward to minute 11:00.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dJut4-dHuV8
Can somebody cut it down from the full video to just Minutes 11:00 - 13:00 or so?
April 12, 2008 10:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Pure bunk. You've been watching talking heads on tv too long and think a race like this can be psyched out and summed up and sewn up. It can't. Clinton could wipe the floor with Obama and then he could wipe the floor with her in N. Carolina and finish her off. And then he could lose to a McCain who pulls way closer to the center (which he is doing already and will continue to do.) Same goes for Clinton if she pulls it off. So stop gloating and grow up. It's a long way to Tipperary.
April 12, 2008 10:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thatt was no apology. When you say you apologize IF you offended anyone, but then go to say that what you said was true about the economic circumstances that people arre in today, BUT you conveniently leave out the really ugly part of the statement - that middle class American workers in small towns cling to their relligion and their guns, and evince prejucide to "anyone who doesn't look like them," and then throw in that their reaction to illegal immigration is just anothere aspect of their economic woes is stupid and insulting.
April 12, 2008 10:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
pssst hey!
Hillary said she was 'sorry if' Bill offended when blowing the racial dog whistle in North Carolina.
But I do agree, 'sorry if' doesn't mean you are sorry it means you are sorry for the person/people that interpreted other than you meant it.
April 12, 2008 10:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Most people who are trying to defend Obama by saying that he "spoke the truth" seem to miss what is "offensive" in he remarks. He was absolutely right in saying that people in a number of communities in America are very anxious about the country's economic woes, but it was offensive (at least to me) for him to suggest that these folks in middle America are "clinging to their guns or their religion" as a result. I am almost sure that those same folks who he is suggesting have found God because of they they down on their economic luck, went to church or hunting (maybe more so) even when the economy was humming in the 90s. The implication of a causality between the downturn in one's economic outlook and one's faith is offensive and is reminiscent of the Gospel according to Reverend Dr. Jeremiah...Let's "cling" to God so that He would damn America for turning its back on our economic suffering...
April 12, 2008 10:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
it was offensive (at least to me) for him to suggest that these folks in middle America are "clinging to their guns or their religion" as a result.
Yes, much better to be like Ed Rendell and just say they won't vote for blacks and leave it at that.
April 12, 2008 10:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama seems to be holding his own.
Start of quote:
In Muncie today, several people said they had heard news accounts of the flap, and so far it hadn't changed their support for the man they had stood in line for hours to see at Irving Gym at Ball State University.
Among them was Dr. Kathleen Beache, a 44-year-old dentist from Indianapolis who said she's a Republican who listens daily to talk radio host Rush Limbaugh and to Fox News host Sean Hannity. She said their views on Obama's comments not only did not change her mind, but she came to Muncie wearing her Obama campaign T-shirt
She said she read the complete remarks Obama made, and didn't take offense. She does, though, take offense at how Obama is being portrayed.
"They've been trying to paint Barack Obama as an arrogant person, and hoping that that label sticks," Beache said. "Because if they can paint him as an arrogant person that's educated, even though he's an African-American, they think somehow that middle America will not identify with him and not vote for him. It's time that they stop that nonsense.
It's "high time," she said, to stop political games and focus on problems, because the country has many, from the economy to education to foreign policy.
Mike Foster, a 43-year-old emergency medical technician from Eaton, near Muncie, said he also had heard about the controversy and wasn't swayed either.
"I'm a realist," Foster, a Democrat, said.
No one, he said, is ever going to say everything just right "100 percent of the time" and that politics such things will get seized upon by opponents.
But, he said, "I think he's definitely a person of change. I think that we have a huge chance to put someone in (the White House) outside the norm."
Marie Douglass, a 56-year-old Ball State University employee from Muncie, said she hadn't heard about the controversy. But, Douglass said of Obama, "I'm reading his book (''The Audacity of Hope") right now, and I feel like he's very in touch. He knows what's going on with us, and I support him." - End of quote
Link
April 12, 2008 10:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
The headline should read:
Obama defends "underlying truth of what I said."
Which would be correct.
April 12, 2008 10:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, It should read "Obama refuses to apologize for insulting PA voters."
Here we have a rookie politician claiming he is a different kind of politician that will bring hope.
Where is the hope in his insults?
It was bound to happen when you blindly trust a politician.
April 12, 2008 10:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why SHOULD he apologize for speaking truth?
Here's a brief summary of Pennsylvania newspapers that see this for exactly what it is: A pundit and opportunist pipe-dream.
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/4/13/111644/425/469/494812
Taking a look at what the ACTUAL people in rural Pennsylvania areas are saying, it doesn't look like Hillary's new-found regular-joe routine is being believed by anyone.
Could it be that she hasn't been regular-folk for over 35 years? Probably hasn't driven a car in 20 years?
Hell, she couldn't even down a shot like a regular person. She sipped it like it was radioactive.
April 13, 2008 1:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Senator Obama said a great deal more before and after this speech. Hillary Clinton's lies about Bosnia and NAFTA far outweigh Senator Obama's description of people's feelings who are struggling in small towns. Besides, he never said that the people were "bitter" people. That's absurd. What he said is they "get bitter", plainly meaning that they feel this way at times, out of sheer frustration, which results in certain political and personal behaviors. Ms. Clinton and John McCain are manipulating words again. Senator Obama says what people need to hear, not just what they may want to hear. Ms. Clinton is putting him down again just to get votes. Please do not be deceived. Hillary Clinton and the Republicans are very good at manipulating you, and they are clearly attempting it again. Ms. Clinton wants you to forget her Bosnia lie and the NAFTA hypocrisy. John McCain wants you to forget Iraq. Watch out!
April 12, 2008 11:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sen. Obama is missing an opportunity, is he not?
He's still being skewered over the Rev. Wright, who epitomizes the bitterness to which he's referring.
So why can't he say, "Elitist is when you don't understand the pain and the bitterness some people feel. When I condemn, with compassion, the words of my own pastor, I speak, from the inside, of the excesses of bitterness that have seeped into my own house of worship."
Then further explain how none of our values are so noble as not to be easily twistable into demagogy, which is why he welcomes the rigorous questions into his exercise of leadership in this campaign.
April 13, 2008 12:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
Of course Obama has deep regrets about torpedoing his campaign! But he misses the point. His phrasing didn't offend people. His attitude offends people. I'm so glad this happened before he sewed up the nomination and it was too late. This has been his attitude all along, but people either didn't see it or refused to see it. Now at least it is coming to light, and hopefully the Democrats will nominate Hillary and we won't have to follow this man to defeat against McCain.
April 13, 2008 1:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
I am offended at corporate America, corporate Washington politics, and government inaction. I met a family today who is loosing their home, it was horrible, I felt so completely powerless and they aren't the first family I've met in this situation.
Our immigration policies are horrible, our educational system is failing our kids, our economy is in the hole, the American dollar is so low right now, and Clinton is in la-la land. Obama is speaking the truth, he is saying what nobody else can say- yes there is a great, big, giant white elephant in the room. America needs to wake up and stop living in denial. Our country is screwed up people, and Clinton wants to dance around the issues and play it safe, but Obama is willing to speak the truth even if it hurts. People can't keep voting on faith or gun control, we need to vote on what is best for our entire nation. Clinton brought in NAFTA, Bill supports the Colombian Free Trade Agreement which will also hurt American jobs. If we don't stop the direction we are heading in now, our country will go to ruin.
April 13, 2008 2:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
I deeply regret but I really don't regret so sayest Senator Empty Suit. This story, along with the good REVEREND Wright will give and give (via MSM and 527s) through the General Election if Senator Barack Obama, the empty suit is the Democratic Nominee. Forget winning PA, Ohio, NJ, IN, and all those small towns in middle America, now lost forever (along with thier EC votes).
Reagan DEMS become McCain DEMS as the stupid leftists return to sucking their thumbs while calling anyone who doesn't or did not vote for Senator Empty Suit Obama and his sidekick Reverend Wright racists.
Bring back the DRAFT! The best thing for the laziest generation.
Draft Private Obama (since he's never served) and stick in ass in Iraq.
April 13, 2008 2:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Just catching up.
My gosh. How nauseatingly John Kerry of him. I love the guy, but sometimes he really doesn't seem to get it. This was a terrific opportunity to grab hold of the class issue -- really, the ONLY issue -- by the throat, and expose McBush and Ma Scorpion as the corporate pimps they truly are.
Instead, he apologizes. Providing much more weight to the growing MSM image of him as a weak latte-drinker.
Damn, I'm sick of this campaign. Barack Obama thinks (or at least acts) like the political culture of the US is something decent, civil, kind, educated and intelligent -- rather than the torture-and-war crime dominated cesspool of gangsters it has been turned into by the Bushes, the Clintons, and the Reagans. Yes, it should be the way Obama embodies it. But it hasn't been for over 40 years.
He really blew this one. And now we'll be stuck with the Hillbillies for at least another 4 months.
April 13, 2008 8:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Welcome to the real world! The wimpy Democrats keep getting their asses whipped by the GOP (e.g. McGovern, Carter, Mondale, Dukakis, Kerry) because they don't play hardball. The Clintons are the only ones who understood the nature of the game. This isn't a nice Kennedy flag-football game, it's tackle with cheap shots and piling on.
And every time they lose, the Democrats sit around wondering what the hell happened. Duh!
But don't despair. Obama has shown he ISN'T decent, civil, kind OR intelligent by the fact that he is lying about John McCain's 100 years in Iraq. He was reduced to an almost Cheney-like comical babbling when confronted with the evidence on a talk show - "But..but..it's on youtube! It's on youtube!".
April 13, 2008 9:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
"I Deeply Regret"...keep regretting Obama... this story is brand new news with legs.
Rasmussen TODAY: Clinton has gained a statistically-insignificant one-point advantage over Obama, 46% to 45%; Obama’s ratings have fallen to 48% favorable and 50% unfavorable. For Clinton, those numbers are 46% favorable, 51% unfavorable.
The best is yet to come! PA by 20+% because of those bitter religious whitefolks.
http://rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/daily_presidential_tracking_poll
April 13, 2008 9:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
For your information
April 13, 2008 10:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
First, let me say I’m an Obama supporter and I consider most of his “bitter” comments to be a solid, traditional, left explanation of why some people working people fail to see their “objective” economic interests. It’s a critique that dates back over a century and should be familiar to anyone who’s read the speeches of famous labor leaders.
However, there is one element of it that I found disturbing: why the hell is “anti-trade sentiment” mentioned as an emotional, irrational response to the decline of workers’ standard of living?!? I mean, I think opposition to trade deals that force U.S. workers to compete with countries where workers are paid bare-substance wages and work 6 days a week, 12 hours a day is the RIGHT response to declining standard of living. Is his opposition to NAFTA "anti-trade" sentiment, or is it something else? I guess I don't get it.
Does anyone have an explanation for why I shouldn’t find the “anti-trade sentiment” comment disturbing?
April 13, 2008 10:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
She later added, however, that she is not herself an expert with firearms: "As I told you, my dad taught me how to shoot behind our cottage. I have gone hunting. I am not a hunter. But I have gone hunting."
This is classic Clinton speak, and it is not getting very much attention focused on it.
Read it again. Hillary tries to con both the gun control and the NRA factions that she is on both their sides.
Hilllary Rambo Clinton, The Heroine of Tuzla, declares:
That She is not a hunter but she goes hunting.
Sounds like she does not duck snipers, but she has ducked snipers.
Big Foot Bill says that Hillary says those types of thing when she stays up until eleven at night because she is old and forgetful.
April 13, 2008 12:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
"The headline should read:
Obama defends "underlying truth of what I said."
Which would be correct."
I agree.
This is often raised and I have in the past defended TPM, but either they are biased in some way or just being sensationalist.
In a media environment filled with lies and bullshit, I do wish TPM could present this intelligently, and not be Jake-Tapper-Lite.
April 13, 2008 1:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
That was no apology by Obama.
We can add this to his list of leaking how he really feels:
* The lives lost in Iraq were a "waste"
* 'People in middle America cling to their guns and religion in bitterness' (paraphrased)
and then of course there is his wife and Pastor:
* Michelle: "for the first time in my life, I am proud of my country"
* Obama Pastor: "God D**** America" ; "America invented Aids"; 'America 9/11'; "Hillary doesn't know what it means to be a black man, Hillary ain't ever been called a Nig***!"
among other gems;
* Michelle: "America is a mean country".
Oh, my my my......
You guys really love your guy! You still support him! LOL
When are you going to sober up from that koolaid and take off those rose colored glasses?
He is a disgrace. He's worse than Dukakis and Kerry put together!
As I've said many times before, you'd rather see him get the nomination over HIllary EVEN if it means losing the general election. You don't really give a damned about winning in Nov. You just want your guy to win. This big faker!
Rae
April 13, 2008 1:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
"You guys really love your guy! You still support him! LOL"
Yes we do.
Is it any different than Hillary supporters?
We don't think she has a snowball's chance in hell of getting elected. If you were to change your post, putting Hillary's name in place of Obama's and putting these scandals
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Clinton_administration_controversies
in the place of what you consider to be Obama's shortcomings, then perhaps you can understand what the slightly more than half of the other Democrats feel about YOUR candidate of choice.
LOL all you want, RaeK. WE don't think Hillary offers solutions, we think she offers more problems. Sure Bill won the Presidency twice, but he lost the majority in Congress which was held for 40 years previously. There's no guarantee that Obama wins OR loses the general. If he can hold the same states that Kerry held (not that difficult to do for ANY Democrat) and adds just one or two others, he WINS.
Spotting Hillary the same states that Kerry won, what guarantee is there that she wins FL, OH? She may win, she may not. There's NO question about which candidate motivates more Republicans to get out the vote, though: Hillary.
It's a crap-shoot EITHER way, you know it, I know it.
The difference here, however, is that you'll see that most Obama supporters attack Hillary's statements, policies and trustworthiness. All things that are on the record and open to debate.
Most Hillary supporters of your genre attack Obama based on long debunked rumors (muslim), outright lies (Obama hates whites) or guilt by association (your M.O.).
All it indicates is that your argument is weak. You can't point to your candidate's strengths, thus you try to tear down your opponent. No matter how hard you tear, it doesn't make your candidate any better... It doesn't improve her stand on the issues, her problems with honesty, or her being a Washington-insider.
The last point I want to make is that what amazes me about seasoned pols like Ed Rendell that say truly stupid things like Wright and Bitter-gate should be considered by the Super-Delegates because the GOP may use it against Obama, but fail to believe that the GOP has been readying to run against Hillary for 2 years.
Tom Hartmann (radio talk-show host) went to the CPAC convention a month ago and was astounded by the stuff they had ready to use against her. They have movies, t-shirts, bumper stickers, books... All of it ready to go against Clinton.
If anything, Obama is MORE electable, if only because these groups are 1 1/2 years behind schedule in gearing up to attack him.
April 13, 2008 1:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YuB_W8o_UsU
April 13, 2008 1:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
When speaking to Hispanics in Texas, Obama stated Americans are scapegoating "migrants", he refuses to acknowledge the term illegal. People were too busy praising him to listen. If you don't agree with his plan to grant amnesty despite the warnings the costs could bankrupt this country, you're scapegoating or "bitter".
No, Mr. Obama. Taxpayers aren't bitter. Taxpayers are just fed up with being the piggy banks for all the social programs you liberals dream up in your ivory towers.
April 13, 2008 3:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
This guy is so arrogant, he can not even utter the words, "I am sorry." He regrets? I'm sure that he regrets saying it. But apologizing and saying that he is sorry is something completely different. I guess he thinks folks from PA just can't grasp that one either. This fake and fraud must go NOW! Please may this Pied Piper usher all of his college kid, latte-drinking, Kool-Aid drunk dilettantes off with him far, far away.
April 13, 2008 7:57 PM | Reply | Permalink