« Hillary Campaign Hits Obama In Pennsylvania Robocalls | Home | DNC Releases New Ad Hitting McCain »

McCain Campaign E-Mail: Hamas Wants Obama

In an early sample of the sort of rhetoric we might expect in the general election campaign, John McCain's campaign has sent out a fundraising e-mail warning recipients that Hamas is rooting for Barack Obama.

"Barack Obama's foreign policy plans have even won him praise from Hamas leaders," the e-mail says. "Ahmed Yousef, chief political adviser to the Hamas Prime Minister said, 'We like Mr. Obama and we hope he will win the election. He has a vision to change America.'"


68 Comments

| Leave a comment

Not.

This.

Time.

In an early sample of the sort of rhetoric we might expect in the general election campaign, John McCain's campaign has sent out a fundraising e-mail warning recipients that his ass is rooting for Barack Obama.

"Barack Obama's foreign policy plans have even won him praise from my asses' leaders," the e-mail says. "I'm mad myself, chief political adviser to the Your Ass is Blowing Gas Prime Minister said, 'We like Mr. Obama and we hope he will win the election. He has a vision to change America.'"


lol

Yawn.

This is part of the "who would Osama vote for?" campaign tactic trotted out in 04 and 06.

The major problem with this is that terrorist groups, including Hamas, have prospered under the martian Bush administration. Last time I checked, Hamas has become a major political player in the Middle East. Additionally, Hezbollah is stronger, and Al Qaeda has managed to gain a foothold in Iraq, where they were unheard of six years ago.

The trend has been an increase in violence and greater political legitmacy for extremist organizations. The blame for this can be laid squarely at the feet of neo-conservatives, including McCain.

This election is shaping into a referendum on neo-conservatism... how the world is less safe, how our nation is less financially secure, and how the same old us versus them rhetoric yields negative return.

This will play to the small and vocal conservative minority who live and breathe ourrage. All Democrats are somehow associated with terrorism, socialism, and populism, and liberals are mentally ill and belong in re-education camps. Will this actually gain traction with the greater populace? I don't think so.

And for all of you that are going to wet themselves with fear over this: relax. The fear of the right wing and their usual tactics is only as strong as you allow them to be. Stand up for yourself and say, "just because we disagree with you does not make us mentally ill terrorist sympathisers." That simple.

user-pic

Hamas has become a major political player in the Middle East. Additionally, Hezbollah is stronger, and Al Qaeda has managed to gain a foothold in Iraq, where they were unheard of six years ago.

Hamas isn't Al Qaeda. They're not looking to destroy the west and return the Caliphate, they're looking for political legitimacy in... (I don't even know what to call it, but Gaza and the West Bank). A more-even handed approach to Israel/Palistine would benefit Hamas because they actually win elections there. Ironically, the one good thing bush did for Hamas was push for democracy.

It is called Palestine, you idiot. But your approach is likely fine with Obama as he's shown no interest, knowledge or sensitivity to foreign policy issues. Oh, that's right, he's been to Pakistan for three weeks back in college and spent time in Indonesia and Kenya. Wow, I'm impressed. Maybe he stayed in a Holiday Inn Express somewhere along the line to have the audacity not only to claim readiness in foreign affairs but to even suggest he had more experience than either McCain or Clinton.

Maybe he's just working on a comedy skit, else his threshold is Bush, Jr. Remember what that got us?!

Matthew
http://www.TheProblemWithObama.com

And may I just reply that, until September 2001, none of us knew or cared about all of this? And that after 9/11/2001, all we wanted was retribution against the parties responsible? And that the parties responsible are not in God Damned Freaking Iraq??!!

OH NO! Well then, in Simplistic World where we all live, that must mean that we must automatically believe the OPPOSITE of whatever Hamas believes, right? Hamas is against Israel? Well we love Israel. Hamas supports Palestine? Then we must HATE Palestine. Hamas promotes a lot of social welfare and education on the local level, and so we must...

Oh, crap. It's not we who live in Simplistic World, it's the Republicans.

Here's a thought, McCain: If you always do the OPPOSITE of what someone tells you to do, you're still letting that person set the agenda. How about you let Americans think for themselves? We don't want to live in Simplistic World anymore

user-pic
If you always do the OPPOSITE of what someone tells you to do, you're still letting that person set the agenda.

This. This definitely needs to be part of Obama's defense against the Hamas argument and other similarly stupid arguments.

I'm too tired to actually write something, so -

McCain Promotes Civil Campaign Process

04/07/2008

Sen. John McCain called for a presidential campaign that is more like a respectful argument among friends than a bitter clash of enemies, and said he is better able than either of his Democratic rivals to govern across party lines.

"We have nothing to fear from each other," the Arizona senator said Saturday as he wrapped up a week long trip designed to broaden his appeal beyond voters who cast ballots in last winter's GOP primaries.

user-pic

Calling Democrats "terrorist lovers" counts as respectful as far as Republican leadership is concerned. After all, they're not calling them "terrorist boy-lovers".

In a breaking news story that will break again tomorrow, McCain feels pain that we all feel pain in Iraq and the Gaza Strip. But until we know how to deal with it all, this will remain breaking news.

ZOMG! If Hamas wants change and Obama wants change then they MUST be friends!!! Ruuuunnn!!!! GIVE McGlory MONEY!!!!!

An old man running old and exhausted Rove playbook strategies -- fear! Fear! Fear! There's a terra'ist under ur bed and Obama is his friend!!!

2004 - people have been there, done that. Not this time.

Sheeeets. I would rather watch molasses pour than listen to McWarmonger.

I'm sure that the 27% or so of Merkins who still think that GWB is just the bestest goshdarn preznit evah, are rushing to give $$

Fools.

Oh but honey, if you poor molasses that sweetly, you might make the terrists think you like 'em.

I suggest you pour some honey with all that sugar. Make the Republicans like ya.

Osama wants McCain.

Cheaper & easier for Al Qaeda to just go to Iraq and fight there.

Not only does Hamas want Obama, but America wants Obama. They just might not be for the same reasons...or are they?

He won't get us, or them, completely blown up! He would actually consider that type of approach imprudent.

The terrists are a-comin!! The terrists are comin!!

Mis Scahlett!!

Aunty-Em!!!

The terrists are comin!!!

How was I pouring molasses sweetly?

WHy would I want the Repukes to like me?

I was being sarcastic.

;)

confused me.

good night. Or is it good morning. I want to get up in time to watch Steffi do McCain.

I hope Stephie gives him Hell!

So what McCain is essentially telling us is Obama's presidency will bring peace with our foreign enemies.

Go Obama!

user-pic

Okay, so Hamas wants Obama. But the real question is, who the heck wants McCain?

well, actually, you folks have no idea what catalog of horrors are out here. one day something big *will* happen, and you'll all wet your pants. and believe me, it will be less pleasant than coming in your pants everytime pretty boy is on youtube.

I dated a prof at City College once. Nice girl, but a real dumb bint when it came to understanding the real world. But even she understood what a disaster open admissions had been for CCNY. Once the "poor man's Harvard," exactly the kind of school for poor but bright kids like myself, in 1974 or so the city buckled to African-American demands to offer admission to anyone who showed up. Result? Within two years the teaching standards of the school were shit, as was the reputation. And nobody even benefited, because now all the kids getting once golden degrees had a piece of worthless paper. And no education either, just four years sitting in a classroom. Now CCNY is making its way back, admitting students on the basis of merit, and a CCNY degree is again a respected credential. Any lessons here?

user-pic

Yes. Buggeroff, Milorad.

Yes a lesson that you are a bigot who attended a community college.

Big lesson: anyone who says they know more about the "real world" than someone else, almost never does. To prove it, they sometimes attach irrelevant, usually based on half truths, ideological antecdotes about how silly something they don't like has become. (Usually these stories have been forwarded to them via e-mail). Leaving the reader to believe if their chosen party was in charge, everything would involve puppy dogs and ice cream and the rapture would soon begin and rays of sunshine would warm everyone's soul and terrorists would automatically have their spines ripped out and everyone would get cookies every night...etc.

Or maybe the lesson was...never believe a story told by a woman named Buggeroff.

actually, I never graduated high school. But I was still the smartest person in my Ivy law skool and b-skool programs.

A fine young fascist cannibal . . .

McCain is just sharing the obvious. Heck, the Los Angeles Times and others helpfully point out his race and Muslim background as reasons why he should be supported to put a new face on American foreign policy. So what's wrong with Hamas supporting Barack Hussein Obama apparently for his Muslim name? They are just trying to be helpful and maybe they too recognize the potential new face on American foreign policy. Too bad of us that there is no substance behind this new face.

Matthew
http://www.TheProblemWithObama.com

"Too bad of us that there is no substance behind this new face."

Too bad sniper-fire, her support of NAFTA, and her voting for one of the biggest foreign policy disasters in American history without reading the NIE makes your argument that much more laughable.

user-pic

Does anyone really think that anyone with a brain that functions on a slightly higher level than Nash McNabe's is going to buy this nonsense?

I just can't see it -

You'd be surprised...I'll bet you a shiny new dime an e-mail with this story will hit every Republicans inbox within a week. And they're eating it up like Santa Claus just left a new bike under the tree. Never underestimate the ability of people to strengthen their preconceptions when the chance is presented to them.

user-pic
I dated a prof at City College once. Nice girl, but a real dumb bint when it came to understanding the real world.

Number 1 - I don't believe a thing you say - right down to "a" "and" and "the."

Number 2 - Nobody cares.

user-pic

I won't redo that comment, but again I screwed up my tags - sorry.

Looks like Obama has captured that all-important terrorist demographic. I don't like to get my hopes up too much, but I can't help wishing to see a video of Osama holding up an "Obama '08" sign. It might be days before I could stop laughing enough to even eat.

As for a "respectful" campaign, Obama already blew that out of the water when he began telling blatant lies about McCain. Obama thinks his feces don't smell, but they most assuredly do.

And what blatant lie was that? Link? Not from RedState or FOX...from a news source please.

user-pic
As for a "respectful" campaign, Obama already blew that out of the water when he began telling blatant lies about McCain. Obama thinks his feces don't smell, but they most assuredly do.

What Democrat worries about McCain being lied about?

Seriously.

that's such a tell - who the hell cares what lies get told about McCain and what sticks? Throw it all at McCain - we're running against the Republicans, remember? I know Hillary-Joe supporters are having trouble holding onto that idea- which I can see -I sympathize, since she can't make up her mind what she is.

Is this the kind of cordial, civil campaign MCCain was promising?

More proof that the sleazy old man is the typical cheating lying GOP bottomfeeder.

user-pic

No offense - but D'oh! Did you really expect anything else? After the mind-meld that George worked on John in '04?


I am not a conspiracy theorist - I'm one of the few people on earth who think Oswald acted alone (and I used to work for a lawyer who was one of his appellate lawyers and I read the file) -but here I do see something and have since '04 when George snapped that choke collar on McCain after Kerry started talking up the differences between McCain and Bush during the 2d debate. From there on out, McCain was Bush's boy. I think promises having to do possibly with electronic voting machines were made.

There's a reason why suddenly McCain started behaving - either blackmail or a bribe.

user-pic

...or dementia. He may have simply become a tool of his handlers. I've never been a conspiracy nut either, not till the Bush administration, but there's been plenty of conspiracy going on since 2000. Just read the NYT piece today about how military "analysts" have been used as tools of the Pentagon to sell propaganda in the MSM.

THIS IS EXCELLENT NEWS!! FOR HILLARY!!!

"As for a "respectful" campaign, Obama already blew that out of the water when he began telling blatant lies about McCain. "

Lies about McCain? You mean those "lies" based on direct quotes from idiot McCain who goes spouting repeatedly about how great it would be to be in Iraq for literally 10,000 years?

Sorry, MCCain dug his own grave. He can lie in it. WaPo and other rightwing McCain puppets can rescue him from his own fat mouth.

Yes, the quotes taken directly out of context. The same ones that Frank Rich wrote on 4/6 that the "refrains that Mr. McCain is 'willing to send our troops into another 100 years of war in Iraq' (as Mr. Obama said) or 'willing to keep this war going for 100 years' (per Mrs. Clinton) are flat-out wrong", and David Brooks wrote on 4/18 that "Obama piously condemned the practice of lifting other candidates’ words out of context, but he has been doing exactly the same thing to John McCain, especially over his 100 years in Iraq comment."

Obama simply quoted the words of one sentence, but didn't include the words of the following sentence which clarified exactly what McCain was talking about. McCain made the mistake of putting his thought into two sentences, which gives lying SOB's like Obama the opportunity to only quote and distort the meaning of the one sentence.

What's the second sentence? I'm giving you all the chances in the world here. If you're referring to the line: "as long as they're not being killed, like in Japan or Germany," I must ask, what is similar about Germany and Iraq?

But let's move even further and get to the meat of it...how long do we continue guerilla warfare until we decide the Iraqi government will continue to stand and there won't be a loss of American interests in the region? Remember, the Israelis fought a 20 year campaign against Hezbollah in Southern Lebanon and voluntarily pulled out. Hezbollah claimed victory, and would have in any situation, although they clearly didn't really win anything. That 20 years of occupation has only made Hezbollah stronger and actually gained them legitimate political sway in the Lebanese parliament...hell, they win the majority of seats from the south.

So if you're serious about doing what's best for American interests, we need to know what success actually is. A good point to start is finding out who we're actually fighting. Five percent is Al Qaeda...who the hell is the other 95 percent?

I don't need a second chance. It's the truth we're talking about, and simple English sentences. The truth simply is.

CNN quotes McCain as having said, on one of the many occasions: "'Maybe 100,' McCain replied. 'As long as Americans are not being injured or harmed or wounded or killed, it's fine with me and I hope it would be fine with you if we maintain a presence in a very volatile part of the world where al Qaeda is training, recruiting, equipping and motivating people every single day." And McCain has expanded on that further on many occasions to make it clear he is speaking of a troop presence as in Germany, Japan, S. Korea, Kuwait, etc.

Obama claims that McCain wants to continue the Iraq war for 100 years. That is a lie. Why don't you just admit it? Unless your well-educated candidate can't read.

You say the "meat" of it is how long do we continue the actual fighting, i.e. the war. No, the meat of it is that Obama intentionally lied about what McCain said. I don't believe Obama is too stupid to understand McCain's words. I think the Obama team is pulling a page out of George W. Bush's playbook (classy, huh?) that they used against McCain back in 2000, which was to lie about him and try and get him to explode.

Now if you want to change the subject to how long are we going to keep fighting in Iraq, then you first should admit that McCain NEVER SAID WE WOULD CONTINUE FIGHTING FOR 100, 1000 OR 10,000 YEARS, and also admit that OBAMA LIED ABOUT WHAT MCCAIN SAID. Then the question of how long to keep fighting will certainly be debated by Obama and McCain, and voters will consider what they say. Hopefully without any of Obama's lies to clutter up an intelligent debate.

user-pic

Since you seem to be sincerely concerned about this point, many of us see little practical distinction in the 100 years "war" and the 100 years "presence". At, what is it now $2B a week, we can't afford a 100 year presence and at least to those of us living in the region of America settled by Germans there is one heck of a difference between occupying a region that is part of a different civilization and occupying one that serves the same food and goes to the same Church as your own friends and neighbors. As to Korea, after a presence of 60 years what have we achieved other than losing the TV market to S Korea? N Korea is still on Bush's top 3 list of evils. You call that success? We can no longer afford this foreign policy. We are over committed, under resourced, and no candidate is willing to tax us to pay the bill for these grandiose imperial commitments.

Yes, I'm sincerely concerned that Obama is a flat-out liar. Apparently that doesn't concern you.

There are thousands of posts on this site and other Obama-fest sites claiming that Obama is perfect, and that Hillary and McCain are all evil distorters who take what he says out of context. But when you are given a clear example of Obama flat-out lying, you say "so what" as if lying about another candidate is no big deal.

Are you interested in truth and objectivity, or just trumpeting your candidate no matter what he does? It looks like the latter, huh? Well, excuse me when I barf when I read all your posts about how evil Hillary and McCain are. You're a joke.

The Iraq conflict is not anything that can be boiled down into "simple English sentences." McCain made the distinction, I admitted that clearly enough I thought. If not, I admit it, he tried to make the distinction. But the distinction is made on false premises. Don't complain when Obama is smart enough to reject that premise. For McCain's premise to hold water, he would have to say the fighting would end very, very soon and that a situation that doesn't exist by any stretch of the imagination, does in fact exist. He can't because it won't.

The premise he has created to defend 100 years of military presence is one that doesn't exist. Think of it like this, if someone asked him how long he could possibly leave his car unlocked in the most crime-ridden part of a city, and McCain answered as long as you want, maybe 50 years, maybe 100! I've left my car unlocked in a gated community in Beverly Hills for years! The answer would be absurd. Your defense of his statement is like that.

Either your lying about not understanding the distinction or you just don't get it. We can afford you not getting it, it's your choice to believe what you want. We can't afford McCain not getting it. And this is one of many issues he simply doesn't get.

That sure is a lot of talking to avoid the simple point that McCain said he'd be OK with a 100-year presence, and Obama ran out claiming McCain said that he wanted a 100-year war. You can say that Obama is "smart". That's a new one. Then I guess Dick Nixon, Dick Cheney and George W. Bush are frickin' geniuses, huh?

"Smart". Obama lied. That's the point. He isn't Mr. Holiness, he's a liar.

"You can say that Obama is "smart". That's a new one."

That's a new one? Really? People think he's stupid? Wow, if that's all you've got in the arsenal, Mccain is truly in dire straits.

And all that writing is explaining why nuance matters and why it isn't a lie to look at the facts and discern the meaning from a statement made based upon a false premise. If you can convince me the premise McCain is operating under is true, then I'll admit you're right. You haven't or won't and therefore I won't agree with you.

Look, I haven't seen anybody say Obama is perfect and can do wrong. That's where you're at the very least stretching the truth and making silly generalizations, neither of which helps you're credibility. He's made some bad mistakes and said things I don't agree with; this isn't one of them based on what I described above. I'm not sure why three paragraphs is "a lot of writing", though.

There are many places you can hit Obama, saying he lied about what McCain said isn't one of them. Not admitting that McCain misspoke says more about you than those defending Obama IMO.

Josh said this about ABC defending McCain's spin:

Late Update: ABC actually swallowed this one from the McCain Camp hook, line and sinker. It's a tour de force of special pleading, and not even by the McCain campaign but by ABC. You've got to read it.

I'm not surprised at all. This is the same ABC that made the hitjob spliced up video on Wright (including parts where he was quoting someone else -- note that no one has called ABC on this blatant dishonesty) and the same ABC that did the one-sided pile on of Obama the other night, replete with Obama-hating "cititzen" plants asking loaded questions. And the same FoxNews-lite ABC which, I guarantee, will not be asking McCain tough questions today.


How much more proof do you need that ABC News has gone over to the dark side this election cycle? ABCNews is rightwing media.

Sad but true. In fact, from now on I'll mention ABC News and Fox News in the same breath.

They used to be so much better than that. Oh well.

user-pic
How much more proof do you need that ABC News has gone over to the dark side this election cycle? ABCNews is rightwing media.

word to your mother.

I mean - come on - how much worse does the corporate media have to get before everyone gets what is going on?


Thank you Ronald Reagan. Thank you, Republicans, for not believing in our constitutional democracy and for purposely fucking up the media in this country. The press is so important to a democracy that the founders saw fit to name the institution in the constitution and give it unparalleled protection.

And this is how the freest press on earth repays the democracy that spawned it. Fuck the corporate media - in a fascist state, the media is the government and the government runs the media.

user-pic

Actually I misspoke upthread - Emmett had been Jack Ruby's appellate lawyer, not Oswald's.

I knew the lawyer who was appointed to represent Marina - but I never talked to him much about it.

This isn't much different than the Steve King comments against Obama:

http://www.thepersonalispolitical.com/2008/03/lets-take-gop-rep-steve-king-down-in.html

user-pic
Obama simply quoted the words of one sentence, but didn't include the words of the following sentence which clarified exactly what McCain was talking about. McCain made the mistake of putting his thought into two sentences, which gives lying SOB's like Obama the opportunity to only quote and distort the meaning of the one sentence.


So I take it that you are a McCain supporter? A Republican?

What the hell are you doing here, except trying to raise hackles? Do you really think the people on a liberal blog comments board are going to somehow be with you on McCain's side?

dude.

user-pic

Gee, I'm sure all the Hillarybots above, the ones so expert on foreign policy that they can point out just how clueless is Obama on foreign policy, know exactly how it is that Hamas came to power. Right?

...er....

Ok, a primer for all you sub-geniuses, then.

Hamas came to power because the pathetically bumbling and incompetent Bush administration, via Condoleeza Rice, set a timetable for holding elections that was consistent with the White House political calendar (you know, the one they use to figure out when to "roll out new products") rather than listening to the Palestinians, or the Israelis, or anyone else who warned them what would happen if they pushed for elections to be held when they were ultimately held. The end result was a Hamas victory. Rice, predictably, proclaimed the Hamas victory as something "no one could have forseen" - no one, that is, except the Fatah party which in many cases had several candidates on the ballot to Hamas' one...and the Israelis...and everyone else they chose to ignore. The White House then condemned the utterly predictable Hamas victory, after having engineered it in the first place by unreasonable demands on the scheduling of the election.

So, to punish the Palestinians for electing the wrong people, all the aid to the occupied territories from the US, UN, EU, and Russia was blockaded. Which meant Fatah couldn't pay the salaries of their people. Meanwhile, Hamas was getting aid from Iran. So Rice goes over and demands more elections - immediately. Fatah leader Abbas tells her "we have to wait until the end of Ramadan" (no one could have forseen, etc.), which twisted Condi's drawers into a royal knot...so basically, the Bush administration's dog in the fight had no funds, while its enemy did, and there was a lot of dirty fighting back and forth. And Congress wouldn't approve money for Fatah, because of the fear it would be used against the Israelis. So Rice gets on the phone and does a little Iran-Contra II with Jordan, Egypt, UAE, and the Saudis to get money and arms to Fatah. Not all the aid came through, but enough of it did to ramp up the Fatah-Hamas warfare. Finally the Saudis managed to get Fatah and Hamas to sit down together and establish a national unity government - which again, was something Condi "did not anticipate" and was furious about - with the result that the State Dept doubled down in its pressure on Palestinian allies, ordering a timetable for electing a new government, one that would agree with the US on Israel. State made a series of demands about how security personnel were to be trained, that Hamas footsoldiers were not to be integrated with the forces, etc. When all this background stuff emerged, Hamas interpreted it the only way they could - as a blueprint for a US-backed Fatah coup. This led, naturally, to another round of violence that "no one could have anticipated". Hamas captured most of Fatah's arms and ammo in Gaza - the ones supplied by Condi's Iran-Contra II program - and Fatah no longer has a presence in Gaza. The Bush administration, the architects of the entire disaster, quite predictably refuse to meet with Hamas to try to sort out the mess. Now people in Gaza live on less than $2 a day, and there's no end in sight to either the economic paralysis or the political one; Hamas feels free to attack Israel with impunity (and why not - we won't negotiate with them and have done everything possible to eject them from the offices they were elected to) and the whole thing is a big stinking pile of shit.

A stinking pile of shit that was engineered by John McCain's BFF George W. Bush's administration - with whom McCain agrees 100% down the line when it comes to foreign policy. Which leads to three points: 1) would it come as any surprise that Hamas would favor anyone over a Bush ally?; 2) it's a bit ironic for McCain to be using that as a reason why people should find him preferable, since his dumbassed party engineered the whole fucking disaster that put Hamas in power; and 3) you have to be a special kind of stupid, towering asshole to jump aboard this kind of rampant dishonesty that completely ignores the facts of what happened and why when it comes to Hamas holding power. And yes, I'm looking at you, Matthew Weaver.

user-pic

Jenn - did you mention that Hamas is like Sinn Fein? There are two arms of Hamas and one of them is a legitimate political organization.

Just like Sinn Fein, in Ireland.

user-pic

Anyone who thinks McCain is going to be above Rovian politics and run a clean campaign only needed to see him on ABC this morning to be disabused of that notion. George S. gave him an opportunity on the patriotism question and he took off running.

Ugly, ugly, ugly.

user-pic

I do really think that Americans are sick to death of ugly, ugly ugly.

I don't think they like Karl Rove. I don't think they like Republicans at all at the moment and I don't think they will like them very much for the forseeable future.

So I am just as glad as not that the Republicans are going with their tried and true strategy - if we don't know how to deal with it by now, we're fucked anyway.

I am so not worried about the Republicans - except when it comes to having enough time to really campaign and that depends on Hillary-Joe.

user-pic

Yes, there are moderate elements within Hamas. But thanks to the meddling of the Bush administration, they are not the ones who currently have the most power within the party. They might have been, if President Dumbass and Secretary "No one could have foreseen" had been willing to sit down with them immediately following the original election that they fucked up with their political timetable...but now? Now Hamas owes its superiority on the ground to the radical elements - the guys who did the fighting against the Fatah coup attempt.

user-pic
Yes, there are moderate elements within Hamas. But thanks to the meddling of the Bush administration, they are not the ones who currently have the most power within the party

True true -

This is a bit off the topic but related to the direction McCain is taking. McCain was with ABC's Center Right George Stephanopolous' this morning.
George asks McCain whether Obama was "patriotic or elitist." So the antonym of patriotism is elitism? "No, no, no, it is terrorism" says McCain, "Obama is patriotic but his relationship with Ayers verges on outrage. And Ayers is terrorist Obama has not condemned." The problem is McCain has hearing deficiency otherwise he would have heard Obama denouncing Ayers' statements in the ABC debate. Seriously, why does Obama have to denounce every bad thing said by other people who are not part of his campaign? On top of that, McCain talking about "outrage," a man who has never apologized for his own action, his vote against Martin Luther King, Jr. Another thing about McCain is he admits he solicited and accepted Hagee's and other Right Wing extrmists' endorsements, but falsely attacks Obama for not condemning the acts and statements of Ayers', which he has done on numerous occasions. Ayers was a member of Weatherman and Students for a Democratic Society (SDS). Both dedicated to anti-war movement in 1969. Obama was 8 yrs old, then. The fact is Obama has neither solicited nor accepted Ayers' endorsement. One true link is both served (1999-2002) on an anti-poverty philanthropic foundation , which included many other dignitaries of Chicago.
Now, McCain was friend with James Thurmond until the latter died. And Thurmond was a part of many KKK terrorist acts. Why has not McCain denounced Thurmond because McCain is a KKK terrorist, too?
And McCain praised today Sen. Tom Coburn, a man who wanted legal "death penalty for abortionists" and who once said "gays are threat to our society ad freedom." McCain is patriotic but his relationship with these Right Wing thugs do not verge on outrage?

"Ahmed Yousef, chief political adviser to the Hamas Prime Minister said, 'We like Mr. Obama and we hope he will win the election. He has a vision to change America.'"

Of course Obama is pro Muslim, he was born Muslim, the real problem with him is his refusal to admit it. It shows lack of character.
Vote Hillary, she was born an American.

Hey Hillarybots....

If Hillary somehow succeeds with her superdelegate coup, this GOP fundraiser email will simply substitute "Hillary Clinton" where "Barack Obama" currently appears. Stop pretending this McCain email means squat.

Seriously, the GOP will attack the Democrats on anything, because of anything, with anything, true or otherwise, because that's just what they do. Why do so many Dems worry about what the GOP will say? They hate you, they hate me, they hate anyone who isn't squarely in their camp. And yes, they hate Joe Lieberman too. They're glad he's their tool, but don't for a second think they'd replace him if they had a chance to, with a full-on Republican. Of course they would. Joe doesn't realize that, but that's no excuse for you not to.

No more hand-wringing piss-ants, please.

how many people in the world would prefer the most powerful country in the world be lead by "sorry to tell ya friends, there's gonna be other wars" over "don't negotiate out of fear, nor fear to negotiate"

i don't think obama is a dove, but compared to mccain ...

I never knew that McCain was in the public relations business for Hamas. The next thing he will hear him talk about is how "the awakening movement" in Iraq is pro McCain, no.. Obama ..no ..Al-Qaeda .. no .. Iranian .. no .. Saudi.
I guess everything gets confusing to McCain if all of it cannot fit on a singular 3X5 card.

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address