« Obama Facing Scrutiny On Lobbyists | Home | Democrats Debate Tonight In Philly »

Lieberman: I Could Keynote The GOP Convention

Get ready for Zell Miller, Part II. Joe Lieberman says that he is prepared to speak at the Republican National Convention this year, perhaps even give the keynote, in order to help John McCain appeal to independent voters.

"If Sen. McCain, who I support so strongly, asked me to do it, if he thinks it will help him, I will," Lieberman told The Hill.


76 Comments

| Leave a comment

Unfortunately, it is unlikely that Lieberman would challenge Chris Matthews to a fight afterwards.

user-pic

The great duel offer of '04. As much as I detested Old Man Miller, I would have loved to see Matthews get his ass beat, especially in a duel.

May I be the first to say, Joe, go fuck yourself.

You are by no means the first to say that.

You are by no means the first to say that.

user-pic

Just stay there, Joe. Your vote in the Senate ain't gonna be so important after this next round of elections.

When can we strip this clown of his committee assignments?

Not in the next congress. Reid confirmed that Lieberman will keep his leadership positions. That would be the first opportunity to exclude him from the majority, no changes can be made this session.

It's like the Democrats are abused spouses.

user-pic

No, spouses don't abuse themselves. Dems are plain old masochists. They have lost so many unlosable elections it's not even funny anymore.

Here's the link:

Independent Lieberman Still Dancing With Democrats . . . Would Lieberman, 66, a four-term Connecticut senator, be stripped of his committee chairmanship and seniority if Democrats no longer had to rely on a self-described "Independent Democrat" for their one-vote majority?

"I can tell you Sen. Reid had talked to me a few times and said he knows there will be talk if we get more than 51 Democrats next year," Lieberman said. "As far as he is concerned, I will retain my seniority, etc., no matter how many Democrats there are next year."

Reid's spokesman, Jim Manley, confirmed Lieberman's account.
.
.
.

Yes, it is that bad.

user-pic

I believe Reid is just stringing Lieberman along. They don't want him to go full-on GOP now.
But if Dems get a significant margin in the Senate, Lieberman will be kicked to the curb - too many loyal Dems to reward to keep a traitor in a powerful position.

user-pic

You think Reid is lying for political expediency?...Say it isn't so!

user-pic

The decision will not be Harry Reid's to make.

He so want's to be McCain's VP. So, so, very much.

One caveat: Lieberman's statement was made mostly before the "small town" flap broke out.

Nice!

user-pic

Why don't you, Droopy?

You're as crazy as last time's keynote speaker so have at it.

LIEberman is another AIPAC hack and THUG...GOOD RIDDANCE

Lieberman is the REAL Judas.

user-pic

No, Judas wasn't tossed out by the other desciples only to return and have their backs later. If he was Judas he'd have won as a Democrat, then changed parties after the election to throw power to the other side....kind of like your hero Jim Jeffords. You know what they say, one ma's Judas is another man's Messiah.

Is there any doubt now that the Democratic goal in 2008 should be not a veto-proof majority, but a Lieberman-proof majority? A couple more seats, and we can kick this clown out of the caucus and let him join his buddies on the other side of the aisle. I bet Connecticut voters are having a serious case of buyer's remorse right now.

user-pic

That's too bad for them. They're the ones who voted for a WATB who was so desperate to cling to his little seat that he switched from Democrat to Ind. before the Democratic primary. That's low and nowhere in the neighborhood of honorable. They knew they were voting for a cheater. They got exactly the representative they deserve.

to be fair, fabooj, the true Democrats voted for Lamont.

Republicans and DINOS voted for Lieberman

user-pic

This is true and I had that in my original post, but took it out because it is common knowledge and is completely besides the point.

Those voters wanted Lieberman (I-Conn.). They wanted someone who refused to play fair. They wanted a sniveling crybaby who goes back on his word and they got him. So, it's hard for me to feel bad for them. They can take Joe with his Zellmemtum, it's up to the Democrats in the Senate to show some backbone and strip this tool of seniority.
It's utter bullshit that they let him keep his seats under the guise that he give the Democrats a majority in the Senate, when he votes with the GOP a majority of the time on major issues.

70% of CT's Republicans voted for Lieberman. 54% of Independents. He got only 33% of the Democratic vote.

Here here! We only need to pick up one seat to give BubsyBubsyBubsy the boot, correct? Then Joey can make his status as the GOP's bitch official and dismiss with the "Independent Democrat" nonsense. It'll be funny to watch how quickly he's ignored by the Democrats AND Republicans once his special majority-making status is gone.

THIS IS EXCELLENT NEWS!! FOR MCCAIN!!!


Seriously, this would be AWESOME.

Dems HATE Lieberman, Independents would see he's not independent at all, and Republicans HATE Lieberman.

In fact, this will be McCain's biggest problem in the General:

He doesn't appeal to "liberals." He doesn't appeal to "conservatives."

He only appeals to "indepedendents", and once Obama is done with him, they'll realize he's not independent at all...

I wonder if Greg and Eric are taking bets on how many times the f bomb is dropped on this post.

From Broadcast News:

Aaron Altman: Would you care to comment?
War Vet: Fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck. There. Can you show that?
Aaron Altman: Depends on if it's a slow news day.

user-pic

fabooj - considering the alternative they were offered, that is what they get.

They get a senator who is far more interested in protecting the interest of a foreign country than the country he represents.

user-pic

Is that "anti-semitism" I smell?

My question is a serious one.

What does it mean to the Democrats between now and November if they were to essentially kick him out of caucusing with them? I understand that control of the Senate would fall to the Republicans, but what does that mean on a practical level between now and November? Would this be harmful, or because this is a general election year, is the damage minimal?

Or is is better to wait until November when the Dems pick up a number of seats and can just toss him aside then?

Anyone have any thoughts?

It means Harry Reid becomes the Senate Minority Leader, Mitch McConnell becomes the Senate Majority Leader, that no bill from the House gets to the Senate floor, and that Democrats get stamped with the "Obstructor" label as they use the filibuster to stop the more egregious "national security" nonsense (to the the extent that Harry can muster enough of the fearful DINO cringers to get forty votes once they're in the minority) that McConnell will be trying to get to the floor.

We just have to grit out teeth and bear his increasingly provocative behavior and look forward to the day, coming very soon now, when . . ., well, I have this whole elaborate fantasy about it:

January 3, 2009. HOly Joe breezes in to the Democratic Cloak Room for the first Democratic caucus of the 111th Congress, ready to gladhand the old pros and congratulate the the new freshmen, smiling his greasy smile and greeting people with that unctious voice like the guy who played the dad in "ALF." He suddenly stops as he senses a certain coldness from the assembled senators. He becomes uneasy as several of the freshmen close in behind him to block his retreat. Then the senators close in on him, pick him and, as a body, carry him out through the Rotunda to the front door of the Capitol where then heave his sorry ass down the marble stairs.

user-pic

Ok, enlighten me again....WHY did Gore pick him as VP??? He might have been better off asking Cheney.

It very well may have cost him the election.

Even pack then, you could tell he was slimy.

back*

user-pic

You know who else was on Gore's short list for the VP slot?

John Edwards.

Oh what could have been...

It's kind of fun watching the jerk go down in flames. The Repugs really know how to stoke the ego of these decrepit, angry, fear-mongering, lying old men...

user-pic
but what does that mean on a practical level between now and November? Would this be harmful, or because this is a general election year, is the damage minimal?

I don't know - but that's what I had hoped Reid would do when Lieberman was re-elected and he didn't do that. I just don't know how that would change things.

Dear Joe,

Get your myrtle the turtle ass up on that podium and inspire them with your dynamic personality and eloquently inspirational speaking style.

Your JoeMentum will carry the day.

Connecticut voters suck. You are a turd. Please flush yourself and leave the seat up so GWB can jump in behind you.

All the best,

IDAK

He better lose his chairmanship the SECOND the Dems don't need him anymore for their majority.

well, it's funny to see how all of you dumb bunnies salivate over Lieberman, a by-and-large sensible and decent guy with a pretty honorable record. and it is really funny to recall how you DBs were squawking that he had no right to run as an independent blahblahblah and how pretty boy Lamont (of the House of Morgan) was gonna whip Lieberman's ass blahblahblah. Eh, the guy's a Senator in the US (of the KKK of A!) Senate, he counds for a lot more than you fools.

Oh, and Obama is still a member of a club with an ignorant fruitcake leader.

user-pic

Buggeroff, Milorad.

someone should tell lieberman that this is the United States of America, not israel, and backing crazy mccain just to start another war with Iran is obvious to everyone with a brain.
no doubt why he now trys to appeal to rush listeners and the repugs base.

user-pic
well, it's funny to see how all of you dumb bunnies salivate over Lieberman, a by-and-large sensible and decent guy with a pretty honorable record

man, just we needed around here - another Republican troll.


user-pic

Not all Republicans are trolls as not all trolls are Republicans.

GOP-Likud Keynote Speaker.

user-pic
Ok, enlighten me again....WHY did Gore pick him as VP??? He might have been better off asking Cheney.

In a lot of ways, this is the question of the 20th century, along with "who really won that election?"

user-pic

You really need to get over the Fla2000 thing. All of the media recounts (you know, the ones that actually counted all of the ballots Gore wanted to) showed Bush as the winner. Bush took office and won a second term. Look at the bright side, if Gore would've won, he'd never have won an Academy award or a Nobel Prize.

My thoughts exactly. Why is this man chair of a major committee?

Don't know that I could stomach The Return of Zell.

"Ah want Buuu-uush!!"

I may blow chunks now just recalling the venal swine.

Why did Gore pick him? Exactly because he is the sanctimonious prig we see today. The anti-Clinton moral arbiter. Biggest political mistake I've ever seen. But the year is young.

Don't know that I could stomach The Return of Zell.

"Ah want Buuu-uush!!"

I may blow chunks now just recalling the venal swine.

Well, let's not forget Obama campaigned for this jerk. I knew at the time -- like many here -- that Lieberman would us Dems under the bus because of the results of the primary.

Honestly, I'd rather have a 50/50 split, with the thugs in charge of the Senate than have Lieberman in a chairmanship. But in fairness, if I were a Senator, I'd want control of the body....

Let's not forget that during the primary Lieberman had the support of Obama, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, and most of the Democratic establishment. After Lamont won the primary, they all supported Lamont.

Lame attempt at trashing Obama.

Don't know that I could stomach The Return of Zell.

"Ah want Buuu-uush!!"

I may blow chunks now just recalling the venal swine.

user-pic
Lieberman: "Good Question" to Ask if Obama is A Marxist Lieberman Praises Rush Limbaugh's "Big Heart"


Just shoot me, please.


Lieberman, you useless piece of garbage - you and the rest of the fucking Republicans need to make up your minds - is it Obama Osama HUSSEIN X - Militant Muslim? Is is Obama X with the racist black power Christian minister? Or is it Obama Lenin, the Marxist?

Come on - which one is it, guys?

user-pic

Actually it would help if Mr. Obama made up his mind and let us know. I certainly don't think he's a Mulim. I do however have a few concerns with the teachings at the church he did attend. I also have concerns about his view of the 2nd Ammendment and his opposition to parental notification for minors seeking an abortion (but since his opinions on those keep "evolving" I may just end up concerned about his honesty).

user-pic

I think its safe to say this is Lieberman's last term in the Senate, I seriously doubt he could run and win again.

There will be dancing in the Democratic Party streets when Harry Reid takes that Committee chair from Lieberman after this next election, but if Reid allows him to continue, there will be lynch mobs in those streets instead.

user-pic
There will be dancing in the Democratic Party streets when Harry Reid takes that Committee chair from Lieberman after this next election, but if Reid allows him to continue, there will be lynch mobs in those streets instead

You got that.

I am all for it - Droopy Dog on Xanax giving the keynote speech sounds perfect for this year's Republican convention.

I guess the only question is whether or not Zell and Joe both contracted their brain-damage-inducing tertiary syphilis from the same source.

I had a thought - Chuck Hagel seems to be genuinely disgusted with the Bush admin and he's retiring after this term. Any chance he could be talked into switching parties NOW so the Dems could tell Zell2 to F himself?

first off, the Bill determining the Senate Majority is NON-REVERSIBLE, so joezoe tortureman CAN'T return control of the Senate to the repuglitards

the Democrats will stay in the majority until 2009, no matter what joezoe does

and my second point ???

joezoe tortureman is politically DEAD, let him join the repuglitard party. nobody in that political abattoir will notice the smell anyway

let joezoe hang with all the other political "DEAD MEAT"

If that's the case, what the hell are the Dems waiting for? I guess they must love the abuse up there.

Lieberman is beneath contempt. (For those that read my posts about Obama, he's just contemptible). Every time I see him I just want to puke. For what respect I have for McCain, I am tormented whenever I see him with Lieberman. My worst nightmare would be for Obama to secure Democratic nomination and for McCain to pick Lieberman as his running mate.

Personally, the Republicans would do well with Huckabee and Romney as their keynote speakers. McCain does not really need to pander to the now-old Republican party.

Matthew
http://www.TheIndependentView.com

So will the Repubs bring out all those "Sore-Loserman" signs at the GOP convention?

What a jerk he is.

A McCain/Lieberman ticket would be wonderful. I can think of nothing better to get people to the polls. Voting against he who "oils his way across the floor" Gollum-like in presentation would pleasure me no end.

user-pic

The funny thing is eight years ago Lieberman was your standard bearer; four years ago, the leadership of the Democratic Party was all aglee thinking about a Kerry/McCain ticket. Now McCain is the anti-christ and Lieberman is Judas. Did they change that much in four years or does your party have no soul?

A committee ouster now? Don't think so.

If Reid announced such an ouster now then the Lie would just make a grandstand event of getting up and walking to the other side of the aisle while the GOP, as usual, exploited the resulting uproar to the max. Crossing over would be an act of political suicide, of course, but that is the destiny of the Lie no matter what... and he knows it.

And while Reid has screwed up massively on all too many issues... have you thought about exactly how much more damage the GOP could do to our country using a Senate majority as they face their inevitable final swirl down the toilet?

No... for better or worse Reid will keep up the charade for the sake of the Lie's ego... for now.

free patriot informed me that:

first off, the Bill determining the Senate Majority is NON-REVERSIBLE

Ohhhh... I'd thought otherwise.

... so what were we waiting for again?

I may have a slight medical problem. I SEE Joe Lieberman, but I THINK "douchebag".

"I Could Keynote The GOP Convention"

Then just do it, you motherf**ker. Drop all pretense that you are a democrate, join the GOP, and give all the speeches you want. Why is there still the illusion that this guy is a dem?

user-pic

Gosh. Who could have seen THIS coming?

Fow now, the best thing to do is to ignore the senile old fart. After the Dems pick up 3 or 4 or 5 seats in November, THEN it will be time to start lobbying the Senate caucus to strip him of his committee seats.

Please go to the convention with McNut and stay with him. don't even think about it twice and do not look back, vinegar Joe.

Matthew,

Is that you holding twin babies? Congratulations.

Leave a comment

Recommended Reader Posts

  • Unwritten...
    by stillidealistic
  • Two Dreamers, by Dorothea Lange
    by Rutabaga Ridgepole
  • Tsunami Wave: Will Wipe Out Republican Party
    by coonsey
  • OBVIOUSLY, YOU AREN'T A HUNTER.....
    by wvbiker
  • The Stupack Amendment played politics with women's lives and won.
    by J. Clarence
  • wooden projects
    by kubaser
  • holly colorado
    by blumun
  • figures geometry
    by muberul
  • short stories
    by lumacer
  • elemtary school
    by luborum



  • Resources

    The Palin Effect

    GOP Map Of Sleaze

    Tire Swinging

    The Final Debate

    World of Sleaze

    All About Sarah

    The Presidential Debates: Round 2

    The Vice-Presidential Debates: Biden v. Palin

    Critic or Cheerleader The Definitive McCain Iraq Timeline

    The John McCain John Hagee Timeline

    Masthead

    Editor-in-Chief
    Josh Marshall

    Reporter-Bloggers
    Elana Schor
    Eric Kleefeld



    Subscribe to this blog's feed.

    Advertise Liberally
    Share
    Close Social Web Email

    "To" Email Address

    Your Name

    Your Email Address