Karl Rove Praises Hillary's 3 A.M. Ad As "Gutsy"
Everyone's been talking today about Karl Rove's big interview with GQ magazine, but I wanted to highlight this bit, in which Hillary's red phone ad earns praise from the master of fearmongering himself.
Asked about the ad, Rove says...
It was a gutsy, dangerous move. She figured out that she had to do something to raise the issue of: Is he fit to be president? And this was a way to do it. I happened to be in Texas a week before the ad popped, and all of her surrogates were hitting him pretty hard on the thinness of his experience. They were pretty brutal. And this ad sort of fed into that.
We don't imagine that Hillary ad guru Mandy Grunwald will be putting this one on her resume anytime soon. On second thought, maybe she will -- it's a high honor, after all.
Separately, Jonathan Martin ferrets out this key passage in the interview, in which Rove previews the coming GOP attack on Obama's patriotism:
There are Democrats, particularly blue-collar Democrats, who defect to McCain because they see McCain as a patriotic figure and they see Obama as an elitist who's looking down his nose at 'em. Which he is. That comment where he said, you know, "After 9/11, I didn't wear a flag lapel pin because true patriotism consists of speaking out on the issues, not wearing a flag lapel pin"? Well, to a lot of ordinary people, putting that flag lapel pin on is true patriotism. It's a statement of their patriotic love of the country. And for him to sit there and dismiss it as he did...
As we've noted here before, should Obama be the nominee, we're going to see a GOP assault very similar to what hit Gore and Kerry -- Obama thinks he's better than you ordinary Joes, and he thinks patriotism is for rubes. Get ready.















I wouldn't sweat it. All you need is a mashup of every Republican candidate for any political office over the last 20+ years sans lapel pin.
Rove's tactics worked pre-YouTube. I can't see it working now....
April 2, 2008 3:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
I also note for the record that Rove's judgment and credibility can be assessed by his statement, in the same interview, that he believes Roger Clemens did not take steroids.
Pardon me while I blot the laughter-caused-piss from the crotch of my pantaloons.
April 2, 2008 4:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ummm...why is there no discussion of yet another Super Delegate coming out today in support of Obama?
Wyoming Gov. Dave Freudenthal...seems to be pretty big news, but it's like it didn't happen. But lots of discussion here about ole Hillary.
Just sayin'
April 2, 2008 3:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
And no mention of Big Bill's meltdown in California, brought to us courtesy of the San Francisco Chronicle . . .
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2008/04/02/BAVNVU2PJ.DTL&type=printable
April 2, 2008 4:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am getting so sick and tired of the Republican appraisal of Senator Clinton. It's disgusting.
From Limbaugh, to Hannity, to Scarborough, to now Rove.
April 2, 2008 4:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
To say nothing of Limbaugh's Operation Chaos.
April 2, 2008 4:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
I know exactly how to respond to this:
"Obama thinks he's better than you ordinary Joes, and he thinks patriotism is for rubes."
That sort of attitude is ridiculous racism. I suggest anyone interested in this perception should go back and watch "To Kill a Mockingbird," specifically with regards to the prosecution's case.
"He thinks he is better than you." What is left unspoken is the man that thinks he is better than you also happens to be black. The "black man thinking he's better than you" is an old trick of the Jim Crow era.
Bring it on. And to hell with the racists in this country.
April 2, 2008 4:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow... talk about dog whistle. Literally, it's what isn't said. Thank you for that perspective.
Peace
April 2, 2008 4:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you Angry Vet. that is precisly what the coded message is
UPPITY NEGRO!!
April 2, 2008 4:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Forth troll to play the race card.
Congrats, you have proven Clinton is not one playing the race card.
Whine on troll.
April 2, 2008 4:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow, you are angry and the third troll to play the race card.
Congrats.
April 2, 2008 4:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ah, and I see that you are playing the "you-are-playing-the-race-card" card. It's like a joker card, only more confusing! Very clever, gotalife!
Hillary '08 - With friends like gotalife, who needs cancer?!
April 2, 2008 4:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
ROFLMAO
Yeah, Karl Rove and the GOP are way above the dirt of using race as an electoral wedge issue.
"Angry.. angry... angry.."
You are to pathetic to even take seriously, but you are good for a laugh.
April 2, 2008 5:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, come on. Now she has a 3 AM ad going after McCain, and Rove is wiping egg off his face. Where is Obama's ad going after McCain? Here's the CIC issue in your face, McCain. When are you people in the echo chamber going to wise up? Obama is way outclassed here. Oh, oh. Class? Dog whistle? Outclassed! Must be racist code.
April 2, 2008 5:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Principle of diminishing returns. That tactic worked in 2000, 2002, and 2004. It didn't really work in 2006. It will fair even more poorly in 2008. Especially if Obama saddles up with Webb or Clark.
Also, when is somebody going to write the book about how Karl Rove has turned the Republican Party into a regional party that is currently hemorrhaging voters and is fragmenting into increasingly bitter camps?
Oh, that's right, he writes for Newsweek. So obviously he's a smart guy.
April 2, 2008 4:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let's not take advice from Karl Rove. It's not like an unbiased opinion or anything. The guy is frickin' Karl Rove, fer chrissakes!
Yeah, they will hit Obama with the patriot thing and Obama will hit back with the Iraq War, the economy, and George W. Bush. We win.
April 2, 2008 4:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Way to go! Someone in the echo chamber finally realized the issue is patriotism, not race. Obama gave it his best shot. Got the faithful to talk race instead of patriotism, MSM to buy in for a while -- and now we're back to patriotism. Watch for Obama to try to make the issue race again.
April 2, 2008 5:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary Rambo Clinton gets praised by:
Turd Blossom,
Rupert Murdoch,
The Puppet Master of "The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy,
and
Her camp praises:
Fox News,
John McCain
and all those who inform the Super Delegates
that they need to be made aware of Senator Obama's skin color, just in case any of the Super Delegates happens to be color blind.
A classy lot, this Clinton crowd....
April 2, 2008 4:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rupert's daughter Elisabeth is throwing a fundraiser for Obama.
Seems Elisabeth has 2 biracial daughters whose father is African..from Ghana.
Guess she identifies with the Obama narrative.
April 2, 2008 4:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
You've got to be kidding me. The best Karl Rove could come up with to slime Obama is the stupid flag pin thing? That's it?
The GOP was praying Hillary would win the nomination. Obama is to nice of a guy to go after that two faced liar Clinton, but Rove and people like him were salivating at the thought.
April 2, 2008 4:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
She actually came out with a new one, believe it or not. Wow.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XpaK-cGO9U
And with that, self-parody is born.
April 2, 2008 4:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
And she is still wearing pearls at 3.00AM. Just what the nation needs; some nut job who doesn't know when to change into pajamas and get some sleep.
April 2, 2008 4:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Since when are pearls gold?
April 2, 2008 5:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
What this ad shows is how she has no money for new ads on the economy. It was real cheap to splice in the foreclosure bit and keep the rest of the ad intact.
Her campaign is bleeding red..and no one is taking credit from her.
April 2, 2008 4:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hm, aside from the fact that it is a bit harder to see why economists or bankers or suchlike might be calling the WH at 3 a.m., I thought that this was a fairly good ad. More to the point, it was an attack against John McCain, which is a very good thing. To my mind, the ongoing race between the two democrats should be focussed entirely against John McCain. That is to say, Obama should run against McCain and Clinton should run against McCain, each never mentioning the other, and voters can evaluate them on the basis of who looks better positioned to take on McCain in the fall. With this in mind, Sen Clinton should be congratulated on putting this ad together. This is exactly what both democrats should be doing.
April 2, 2008 4:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
You are absolutely right.
April 2, 2008 5:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
When are you going to snap that you are about the only rational Obama fan left in the Obama echo chamber, Greg. These kneejerk reactions must be painfully embarrassing to you. Smart ad. Neither of our candidates can take him on on the character for CIC issue, but they can whip his ass on the economy. First spanking. Presidents are more than CICs! No matter who our candidate is, this ad softens up McCain. Good job, Clinton! Pile on Obama! Kick that chump McCain's ass!
April 2, 2008 5:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
That is the stupidest ad of the campaign so far. But I'm sure Hillary will manage to top herself.
April 2, 2008 4:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree.
Probably the 3 am call was from Bill saying that she had lost another super delegate.
April 2, 2008 4:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
From my mouth to the Ears of God. 2nd Montana super for BHO. Hallelujah!
http://www.kxmb.com/News/224840.asp
April 2, 2008 5:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Greg,
"Should" Obama be the nominee....? He will be the nominee barring some very unlikely change of events.
Get Ready? We are ready. What would help us get ready is if Clinton supporters like yourself would stop carrying water for the right-wing in its jingoistic patriotism smear of the presumptive nominee.....
What is really the kicker is that you seem to forget that Clinton is the most hated figure on the left for most of the country. As shocking as that is to bloggers who leave New York City once or twice a year, we're more scared of the seething antipathy towards Hillary than we are of flag-lapel smears or secret Muslim whispering campaigns.
April 2, 2008 4:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
No shit.
We're ready. Bring it on.
The question is: Is TPM ready, or will they become a right-wing talking point machine?
Say it isn't true, Greg!
April 2, 2008 4:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Shoot the messenger but it is Obama's message of unity.
Brilliant huh?
April 2, 2008 4:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well said Daedalus.
Greg, this ia a bullshit post. I thought we were done with the Obama supporters are naive and need to be educated about how the GOP will assualt Obama crap. I'm also tired of supposedly liberal blogs giving Rove a voice and repeating his talking points.
April 2, 2008 4:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
I want to be kept informed of what rove is saying and doing. Reporting that here is not giving him a platform. He has a platform at all the right wing blogs. Here it is keeping his political adversaries informed of his doings.
April 2, 2008 5:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Praise from Karl Rove and Richard Mellon-Scaife? She really is the new Lieberman...
April 2, 2008 4:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, the Karl Rove Stamp of Approval.
To me, this is further evidence that the Clintons are obsessed with sucking up to their enemies, while they're all too quick to screw over their friends.
April 2, 2008 5:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's pretty thin gruel. Even John "I voted for it before voting against it" Kerry was hurt because of his perceived stance on the war. A flag pin? Sorry. Bring something better.
April 2, 2008 4:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rove is running in 2000 and 2004. He hasn't changed with the times, it must happen to the best of 'em. Yeah, people care about lapel pins, but they care more about putting food on the table and educating their kids.
It's patriotic to work for prosperity.
April 2, 2008 4:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Senator Clinton, you should be proud. It is as though you have officially aligned yourself with the Republicans. When you get the head of Republican fear-mongering, Karl Rove, praising your tactics, you know you've done good, Republican style! Though it is not surprising that such praise from such a person comes your way, considering you have praised your Republican opponent above that of your Democratic rival. Keep up the dirty work, and you may just win the coveted title of "Head Closet Republican", beating out current rival Senator Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut.
April 2, 2008 4:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let them try.
"'My country, right or wrong.' When right, to be kept right; when wrong, to be put right."-Carl Schurz adding his addendum to Stephen Decatur
If this election requires nothing else, it will require a full-scale takedown of scumbag jingoism. And Barack Obama is uniquely talented enough to pull it off. There can be no hesitation. If the right-wing wants war, then the Democrats will need someone with the oratorical and intellectual acumen to blow them out of the water.
I'm thinking back to the tone he took in his Iowa Jefferson Jackson Dinner speech and his takedown of Clintonian Triangulation. He'll need to show similiar power when it comes to fighting the Republicans. Personally, I have more faith that he can do it than Hillary Clinton can. And I think, like Wright, if he pulls it off then he and the Democratic Party will be all the stronger for his doing so.
April 2, 2008 4:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree abotron.
I imagine Obama giving a speech similiar to the one Blair delivered to Congress on the war. I was wishing I was English that day. Blair did a magnificent job of laying out the choices and inspiring citizens to rise up to the challenges of their times. It was awesome.
I was so embarassed that my President had to follow that speech.
I just wanted to crawl up under a rock knowing how stoooooopid Dubya was going to sound.
Obama will deliver a speech on patriotism, the US Constitution and our rights under this democracy that will have those folks in Appalachia questioning just how unpatriotic they have been.
Obama understands the power of dissent within a democracy and he will break it down.
April 2, 2008 4:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
An oldy but a goody, worth another read. And just seems timely.
http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2007/04/13/pat_robertson/
April 2, 2008 4:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Should Hillary win the primary, not even Mellon Scaife will be able to protect her from the huge right wing sludge machine. Enough with the double standard.
In any case, Obama supporters will overwhelmingly outfund the anemic Republicans.
April 2, 2008 4:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
I actually like the new version of 3 AM because she's actually attacking, um, John McCain, rather than a member of her own party.
April 2, 2008 4:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
As much as I love Obama, he does need to address this. Still, he's bounced back from the Rev. Wright video and he can overcome this issue too.
Part of the problem, which apparently isn't going away, is the media's tendency to go for the simplistic issues rather than the complex and patriotism, is about as knotty as it gets.
Certainly all of those Bushies who wore flag pins, let the country down in many major ways. Iraq, the price of oil, the credit crunch, inflation, etc. etc.
April 2, 2008 4:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
The only reason Rove called the ad gutsy is because the red phone ad plays right into the GOP hands.
The red phone ad made GOP Americans say...we want McCain answering the phone.
It was a dumb ad and Hillary is paying big time for it as it is just another hyperembellished situation just like her ducking sniper fire.
She has no experience to be CinC...nada, zip, zilch...other than to go on bimbo patrol looking for Bill
April 2, 2008 4:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, it turns out that everyone was wrong to worry about Obama reaching out to Republicans -- you know, people like Karl Rove and Richard Mellon Scaife. The real unifier here is Hillary.
And she's a fighter!
April 2, 2008 4:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yup but they would rather hate than support a winner.
April 2, 2008 4:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Once again, gotalife, your point is clear and astute! I think we can all gather from your comment that you...
Well, anyway, great comment! Very well reasoned!
Hillary '08 - Um, on second thought, I'm not sure I'd like people like gotalife speaking on my behalf.
April 2, 2008 4:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you.
Have a great day!
April 2, 2008 4:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gotalife, you prove definitively that having an extra chromosome is never a bad thing!
Hillary '08 - My name isn't Corky, it's CHARLES!!
April 2, 2008 4:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Diet Coke all over my monitor is EXCELLENT NEWS!! for my EMPLOYER!!!
April 2, 2008 5:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
You know when Mike Huckabee has a more nuanced and informed opinion on race in America than you, that's a sign you should stop digging:
April 2, 2008 4:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Obama thinks he's better than you ordinary Joes"
I hate this anti-intellectual, "What now, big city lawyer, you gonna tell me mah business? Ya think you're better than me, do ya?! I ain't never had much cause for book learnin' but I know the way this here world spins" bullcrap slant to politics so goddamn much...
They all think they're better than us or they wouldn't be trying to run our entire country. And you know what? I sure as hell hope they actually *are* better than us.
April 2, 2008 4:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, if Turd Blossom thinks this is a solid line of attack, it may come back to bite:
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0408/McCain_unpinned.html
April 2, 2008 4:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama knows it's coming. I attended the lunch fundraiser in NYC last week. Obama said he was anticipating three lines of attack from the Republicans in the general election: patriotism, immigration and war/terror/fear.
April 2, 2008 4:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
What is it with the clintons and conservatives lately?
April 2, 2008 4:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
She is using Obama's unity message to show he is divisive and she is actually a uniter and a fighter.
Glad I could help.
April 2, 2008 4:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Since when do we have to listen or accept teachings or rantings from someone who put party first rather than country.
I, for one am sick and tired of those shoving their form of Patriotism or Idol worship, claiming that only they have the truth.
We followed this blind patriotic fervor, and now were in Iraq. Not being able to withdawl, because we would be humiliated and the enemy would gloat.
Blind patriotism, just like the Nazi movement or the Brown shirts of Mussolini.
Patriotism is a tool.
Just like Bush and Company, who have abused the volunteer Military for their POLITICAL GAMESMANSHIP, It shouldn't be to difficult to remind voters of the falsehoods and lies, covered by wrapping oneself in the Flag, covering the blood stained hands.
Maybe it's time to take back our country from the liars, who only claim, to defend, but prove that they abused their authority.
This is a much needed dialogue, in America.
April 2, 2008 4:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
I thought TPM was a "Progressive Democratic" blog. Greg and Eric have consistently proven me wrong.
Josh, you agree ?
April 2, 2008 4:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Pretty clear who Rove fears more. For all the attacks on Kerry, Gore, and Dukakis for being effete elitists, those three lost for a lot more reasons (or in Gore's case, didn't lose). In each case, the GOP had much bigger positives on their side. GWH Bush rode in on Reagan's popularity and Dukakis' terrible campaign; W benefited immensely from Clinton's penis; and W, the second time, had 9/11 to run on and a war the American people hadn't completely turned against yet. Patriotism, swiftboating, the tank ride, exaggerations -- none of them killed the Dem. candidates. Sure, they stung, but the idea that Wright and FLAG PINS will sink Obama is just foolishness. He might not win, but it will be for real reasons, not just this garbage.
April 2, 2008 4:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
THIS IS EXCELLENT NEWS!! FOR HILLARY!!!
April 2, 2008 4:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
OK, so can we all agree now that when we slam Hillary for her Rovian tactics, that's the simple truth and not a "smear"? What more confirmation would you need than the deal of approval from the "master" himself?
As for the fall, Obama can defend himself- and connect with people retail-style- a whole lot better than Kerry did. And as for 3 am, he already has a lot of respected foreign policy heavyweights on his side, Hamilton being the latest (and one who's very much an official MSM "serious person"). Let the games begin.
April 2, 2008 4:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rove belongs in jail.
April 2, 2008 4:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
The GOP will run such a strategy, but after the past eight years I really think that a majority will reject it for what it is-namely total bullshit. Sure, a segment of the population will buy into it, but this sort of nonsense barely worked in 2004 and failed miserably in 2006. Besides Obama is ten times the candidate that Kerry was in terms of his ability to reach out to people. I also think that it will be a lot more difficult to cast Barack Obama—a self-made African-American who was raised by a single parent—as an elitist that it was to pin the lable on John Kerry, a French-speaking brahmin from Massachusetts.
April 2, 2008 4:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
After moving from Michigan to Oregon two years ago, I've really noticed how different the western (or at least northwestern) independent swing voters are from those in the Mid-West. I can clearly see Rove's idea working inn the rustbelt and south, but it would back fire out here. I think things like this explain the willingness of Red State democrats to endorse Obama.
April 2, 2008 4:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow, Clinton gets the unity and the trolls attack the same message Obama spews.
OMG, that is too funny.
These trolls are disgusting with their hatred of the President and First Lady. Did your parents teach you about respect and decency?
The me generation are spoiled brats who think it is all about them.
It is not about you trolls, get over yourself.
Yes, she is a uniter and a fighter.
What else do you want you spoiled brats?
April 2, 2008 4:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
These trolls are disgusting with their hatred of the President and First Lady. Did your parents teach you about respect and decency?
Now be honest, do you really think Bill Clinton is President?
gotalife: I may not be smart, but I sure do love to post bullshit!
April 2, 2008 4:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
He will be President Clinton until he dies.
Show some respect.
April 2, 2008 4:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
King for life!
That's how we do it in America!
gotalife: more fun than leprosy!
April 2, 2008 5:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Look, I respect President Clinton, but just because you're President doesn't mean you automatically qualify for respect.
Case in point: George W. Bush.
April 2, 2008 5:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Can we safely assume that Rove is on retainer?
April 2, 2008 4:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why should we be surprised at Hillary being a neo-con in sheep's clothing? HER MAIN ADVISOR IS MARK PENN, WHO CUT HIS TEETH ELECTING MENACHEM BEGIN PRIME MINISTER OF ISRAEL.
She's totally in the palm of the neocons.
April 2, 2008 4:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
So far, Obama's campaign has done the best job I've seen yet in countering smears, attacks and lies.
Clinton's campaign, on the other hand, isn't. All she has left is smearing Obama.
And they can't seem to stop the bleeding from all that Tuzla sniper fire. So I totally fail to see how it is that Clinton is such a sure thing.
She ain't - she doesn't have the campaign staff for it.
April 2, 2008 4:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh. No.
Rove spoke. I'm shaking in my trainers. Yawn. Isn't there anything relevant going on in the world? Who cares what Karl Rove thinks?
April 2, 2008 4:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly. Enough said.
April 2, 2008 5:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
In fairness, I think we should be paying attention to Rove, because the GOP pays attention to him. In that sense, he acts as a useful bellwether of what the Republican strategy against Obama will possibly look like.
But I'm certainly not afraid of him.
April 2, 2008 5:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wish I had a nickle for every hand-wringing post about the terrible GOP assault that's coming. Run for the hills,, hide your women.
Of course it will come, and it'll probably be worse than what we've seen so far and worse than 2000 and 2004.
After all, race is involved this time. The daily dog whistles from Bill and Hill will seem tame when Limbaugh, O'Reilly, Hannity and Rove get going.
But... when writing these kinds of posts, wouldn't it be balanced to note that the assault on Clintons would be as vicious but of a different kind (the greatest hits parade of sniper fire, Kazakhstan, girls on the Burkle jets, Monica, and so on sure to come)?
The point being -- the Republican attack machine will have its fun regardless of whom we nominate, and it's not clear it will be any less vicious with one candidate or the other. In fact, one could argue that Clinton has had an easier time this campaign than Obama, because he hasn't really pushed the Fox-Limbaugh-Rove line, and they've tactically decided to go easy on her. For now.
And, is it just me, or does Obama seem to be more deft, real, and thoughtful in parrying these attacks than, say, Kerry and Gore?
And, do we think people are buying this junk, this time?
Finally, isn't it mildly ridiculous to make -- or even repeat -- the "elitism" claim with Obama?
Mixed race, son of a poor single mother, worked as a poorly paid community organizer, then a poorly paid civil rights lawyer and state legislator. Yeah, sounds like a regular Westchester County brie eater to me.
April 2, 2008 4:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not only do I agree, but I submit most people agree.
After all, Obama is leading overall in the polls, he beats Hillary in CA now, and is getting closer to Hillary in PA.
April 2, 2008 5:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Effete elitists" reminds me of Spiro Agnew. Remember him?
April 2, 2008 4:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nattering nabobs of negativism!
April 2, 2008 4:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is 3.00AM. The red phone rings in the White House.
Some where in the world, an airport is being attacked by snipers.
Who do you want pulling on their Kevlar Pantsuit, to deal with those Snipers?
I am Hillary Rambo Clinton, and I approve of this message.
April 2, 2008 4:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Well, to a lot of ordinary people, putting that flag lapel pin on is true patriotism."
oh yeah Karl, what about lying to the AMERICAN PEOPLE AFTER THE TRAGEDY OF 9-11? Using people's sadness and despair to practically bend everyone's will by forcing a war in Iraq? Bending intelligence to make a case? Throwing George Tenant under the bus...
Putting troops out in danger's way, not providing them with enough protection, torturing people- is that patriotic? Is that the American way, Karl? A lapel pin? Don't dumb down the American people buddy, a lapel pin does not overide stealing an election, not counting the votes of African Americans, sending the country's treasury into ruin etc. Give me a break. Even McBush called our this administration on the torture. The American people know that true patriotism isn't a lapel pin. If they aren't going to support Obama- it isn't cause of a lapel pin.
You rich, elite Republicans are the ones that screw over the working class, send their kids to war, and don't do anything in the Katrina disaster, home-mortgage disaster...where is your love of America there buddy? Did you see that article yesterday about the study detailing that only 1 out of every 2 high school kids graduates in the city.
Bush's ratings are so low even McCain is distancing himself! You are a joke and your legacy is in the sewer with the day's waste. You are a poor example of an American. You are the lowest of the low. You shame our nation. Your opinion means nothing. Your crimes will never leave your side.
April 2, 2008 4:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why, oh, why do journalists act as if every word coming from the mouth of this foul little man deserves our undivided attention. We are Democrats - we don't take campaign advice from the man who dug the ditch deeper than it had ever been dug before. One of the reasons Obama resonates with people is because he doesn't focus on crap like flag pins. And before everyone lectures me that this is just what the Republicans will do, let them . It will just seem pathetic. People are tired - and I mean bone tired of this administration and everything to do with it.
Ever notice how much we hear from Rove these days? This is a man who loves the sound of his own voice - and the press just laps it up.
The way to drive Rove crazy is to make him insignificant.
Look Away!!
April 2, 2008 4:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
The point being -- the Republican attack machine will have its fun regardless of whom we nominate, and it's not clear it will be any less vicious with one candidate or the other. In fact, one could argue that Clinton has had an easier time this campaign than Obama, because he hasn't really pushed the Fox-Limbaugh-Rove line, and they've tactically decided to go easy on her. For now.
And, is it just me, or does Obama seem to be more deft, real, and thoughtful in parrying these attacks than, say, Kerry and Gore
I think you got it - you are dead right about everything. That's why "electability" is such bullshit - it doesn't matter who is nominated, the Repugs will throw everything at them. But it's pretty obvious that Obama and his staff are a whole lot better at dealing with smears than Clinton and her staff. How did she try to fade her lie about Tuzla? Another 6 lies.
April 2, 2008 4:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
You started a trend here with your friends playing the race card like you did.
We are up to #4 now.
So, who plays the race card and when will you admit all the Obama lies?
She admitted her mistake yet Obama has not.
Don't worry the gop will make him since his supporters give him a free pass on all his lies.
April 2, 2008 5:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
the US flag lapel pin is a fashion trend started by the Bush administration and hopefully will end at the end of the Bush administration in Jan 2009.
Am I the only one here who got tired of seeing everyone mimick this Bush fashion, wear the pin, wear the pin, for the love of god wear the pin!
You got television broadcast journalist wearing it now. Ridiculous.
April 2, 2008 4:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
I can listen to Rove with equanimity nowadays, knowing how he helped George W become the worst president in the history of America. Rove, with his slime tactics, is the reason behind a long term demise of the Republican Party.
But, most importantly, Rove helped the boil of destructive politics come to a head and spew painful awareness across the land. In that, I think we can all thank Rove for innoculating us against the power of those tactics nowadays, which is why Hillary campers using those tactics are harming Hillary more than they harm Obama.
Greg Sargent says, "Be ready'. Well, yes, most Americans are more than ready, they are aware and eager to counter and replace the intentionally divisive old ways of campaigning.
Even McCain is aware of the changed mood in the country, unlike Hillary Clinton who is desperately embracing old tactics to try to win, only to see her own base narrowing to older women and low information voters.
Hillary's approval scores have dropped to a dangerous low, and that is because of the change mood and new level of awareness among citizens. I predict that if republican 527's try to follow Rove's lead, then McCain too will suffer a drop in his approval levels.
April 2, 2008 4:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
"As we've noted here before, should Obama be the nominee, we're going to see a GOP assault very similar to what hit Gore and Kerry -- Obama thinks he's better than you ordinary Joes, and he thinks patriotism is for rubes. Get ready."
Gosh, do you really think so? Are you actually saying that the GOP will attack Obama as being some kind of an... an elite?
Golly. Never thought of that before. See, this is why I read TPM... to gain these keen political insights.
I'd better support Hillary now. The GOP will never brand Hillary Clinton an elitist. Nope, if there's one person who can lock up the Joe Six-Pack vote for the Dems, it's Hillary Rodham Clinton.
April 2, 2008 4:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
So does this mean that John McCain is unpatriotic?
April 2, 2008 5:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
So what's the point of this, Grog?
I know. It's the part you left out:
=====================================
GQ: I get the sense you respect Hillary more than you respect Obama.
Goering: Off the record?
CQ: Please don't go off the record.
Goering: Off the record… [Yeah, it's good. Sorry.]
GQ: Damn! Now say that on the record.
Goering: No. Nope. Nope. Nope.
GQ: Let's try again, then: on the record. I get the sense you respect her more than him.
Goering: Uh, I know her better than I know him. And I just, uh—she has been around public life a lot longer and has demonstrated, you know, more involvement than he has.
=====================================
Isn't that the truly interesting part, Grog? The fact that Barack Obama is uninvited to the party by the one of the great Fascist enablers of all time? Or how 'bout the fact that this war-criminal election-thief is walking around free, rather than swinging from the same noose that got Saddam? And being asked to make moral judgments of Demo candidates yet!
Sheeesh.
April 2, 2008 5:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Greg, why do you guys at TPM doubt that the Republicans will question Hillary's patriotism as well? McCain has already made an ad based on Hillary's desire to create a Woodstock museum, and you can bet he'll drag it back out if she somehow gets the nomination. If I recall, Matthews and Co. ate that one up. Also, how many times will we hear variations of the following:
1) While John McCain was serving his country, Hillary Clinton was at the LIBERAL Wellesley College, undermining their efforts by speaking out against the war.
2) Hillary Clinton was for the Vietnam War before she was against it.
3) Hillary Clinton was for the Iraq War before she was against it.
4) A voice-over of John McCain talking about being a POW as footage of John McCain as an actual POW plays, contrasted with a voice-over of Hillary talking about dodging bullets in Tuzla as footage of Hillary strolling across the tarmac plays.
April 2, 2008 5:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yep.
I don't know if Greg thinks we're stupid, or what.
Yes, we all know that Republican suck.
But you know what? Why don't we spend time working on how to combat those attacks, rather than running scared...
to Hillary of all people!
April 2, 2008 5:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow Rove, stunning argument on the patriotism...the logic is just super duper...
I'll be expecting Hillary to hit that up any day now..
April 2, 2008 5:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
You mean the exact same attack they've trotted out against every other Democrat?
That all you've got, Karl?
April 2, 2008 5:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why is it news just because this pathetic man opens his mouth and says something? Is it because it was somewhat complimentary towards Hillary?
Folks, this dipshit is a SCAR on our country. I know I sound like a "raving liberal" but the truth is I'm pretty centrist. I just happen to think it's obscene that a man who has caused out country such damage is not in prison!!!
April 2, 2008 5:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Most of the lapel flag pins were manufactured in China.
The founders of the nation never wore flag pins.
Bumper sticker patriotism is the last refuge of the Neo-Con Chicken Hawk, War Mongering class.
April 2, 2008 5:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent points Liam (loved your earlier posts too).
When Obama is the nominee and he is debating McCain and the "lapel pin" issue comes up, that would be a GREAT riposte!
Moderator: "Senator Obama, what do you say to people who think you are unpatriotic for not wearing an American flag on your lapel?"
Obama: "Well, let's see, Senator McCain, where was your American flag lapel pin manufactured? China?"
The hacks all want gotcha moments, that would be a classic one!
April 2, 2008 5:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
So while you guys are whining about Clinton and Rove, she is in McCain's face with a new 3 AM ad, pivoting to the economy.
April 2, 2008 5:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
You mean a recycled ad.
Honestly, I was disappointed with that one. I was hoping she was really going to hit McCain hard on his greatest weakness.
But, all everyone is going to talk about is how Hillary is so short on cash, she can't afford new ads.... and she wants to manage our economy?
April 2, 2008 5:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Clinton gets Rove Endorsement!
April 2, 2008 5:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think the patroitism angle is exactly how the republicans will attack Obama. Obama should use his wonderful oratorical skills to link his nationalism with a populist message. Eg. "Patriotism is more than putting on a lapel pin. It means protecting American jobs. It means holding war profitteers to account. It means fixing our roads and bridges instead of selling off America to the highest bidder. It means repairing our deficits instead of going deeper into debt with foreigners."
April 2, 2008 5:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rove, like the Clintons, is completely out of touch with America. Does he really think people who can't afford the gas to get to work (those who still have jobs) are worrying about a pin? Way way out of touch!
April 2, 2008 5:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama should just state that wearing a flag lapel pin doesn't mean you will run the US government well. "The most patriotic thing I can do is perform well for all citizens of this country as your President".
Also, he should mention that why he doesn't always put his hand over his heart during the national anthem, he never puts it over his stomach either (reference famous photo of GW doing just that). :-)
April 2, 2008 6:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lars, I couldn't have said it better! That's it in a nutshell
April 2, 2008 6:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
What gets me is that the Bush administration gets away with it. They will get away with it. They've already destroyed Iraq in many ways, Bush and Co. could give a s*** about our brave troops and what they and their families have sacrificed. All they want is control over Iraq, and over their oil.
They plan that Bush and cronies and neo-con's want is to partition Iraq into 3 or 4 areas (EERILY colonialist), privatize IRAQI oil against IRAQI POPULAR WILL, prop up leaders that benefit the United States, wipe out or buy off Nationalist opposition who want PUBLIC MANAGEMENT OF OIL and a UNIFIED IRAQ not a PARTITIONED IRAQ (that is easier to control). No, the media, both MSM and independent do not tell the American people that THIS is what is behind MUCH of the violence.
It isn't so much "sectarian" or "ethnic" violence as much as it is a difference of opinion about the future of their nation. A political difference. All so that US corporations can access their OIL. Is is worth it? Couldn't we have upped mileage standards, or drill ALASKA, rather than loose 4,000+ Americans?
April 2, 2008 7:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Shhh.
Bush's brain just endorsed Hillary. Gotalife is frolicking in her new GOP relevance.
April 2, 2008 7:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Clinton/Rove 08 - Spin You Can Rely On
April 2, 2008 7:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Clinton gets Rove Endorsement!
Next up - George pins a Purple Heart on Hillary for breaking the heel off her shoe when she was running from sniper fire in Tuzla.
Then Dick Cheney will endorse her, and the next thing we know, all machines vote Hillary!
April 2, 2008 7:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
LOL
Hillary wears high heels ? No wonder she seems to be a "tall" leader.
April 2, 2008 9:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe I missed something, but it does not seem to me that Greg Sargent was agreeing with Rove that Obama thinks himself better then the rest of us. The use of the italics indicated to me that Greg was emphasizing that Rove is trying to push that idea.
Perhaps I am mistaken. Greg, perhaps you could clarify your intent?
Sincerely,
Miles Webster
April 3, 2008 1:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
So, if the GOP wants to resort to such tactics, websites like this should take great pains to expose their seedy tactics; YOU should be part of the first line of defense (or offense). Swift-boating worked against Kerry, in large part, because no one stood up and loudly cried foul (particularly Kerry himself). In this YouTube/Google age, when the truth and contradictory information is readily available, no Democratic candidate should ever again have to worry about baseless attacks. Democrats need to grow a spine, and call a foul a foul, and not pass on seedy info for the sake of "journalistic fairness." A reluctance to speak up got us Bush. Don't let them hand us McCain.
April 3, 2008 1:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wright, the wife's abhorrent statement, and this refusal to wear a pin, together will be a turn-off for a lot of Americans, like it or not.
If Obama continues to fail to wear the pin, he's a pinko. If he dons the pin under pressure, he's a weakling and a clown. Can't you hear Tim Russert asking him about it at the debate podium, with McCain sniggering at first, then swelling with patriotic pride for his red-white-and-blue riposte?
Russert sets up the question as above, of course: Given Wright, given the wife's diregard, how's about this pin? Tricky spot.
April 3, 2008 2:41 AM | Reply | Permalink