Hospital Says Story Told By Hillary Is False
A hospital in Ohio is disputing a story often told on the stump by Hillary Clinton, in which a woman was allegedly refused care over an inability to tender $100, and later died of complications from a stillbirth.
The hospital maintains that the woman in question was in the care of an obstetrics practice affiliated with them when she died, and had never been refused service. They also say that the Clinton campaign never contacted them to check on the story. "We implore the Clinton campaign to immediately desist from repeating this story," said the hospital's CEO.
Clinton spokesman Mo Elleithee said the campaign verifies the anecdotes that they are told. "In this case, we did try but were not able to fully vet it," Elleithee said. "If the hospital claims it did not happen that way, we respect that."

Hillary kept pushing the story AFTER her campaign was notified by the NYT, and had issued a statement acknowledging they didn't vet it:
http://www.jedreport.com/2008/04/did-clinton-cam.html
April 5, 2008 9:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
The she is liable for slander and the hospital could and should sue her for damages.
April 6, 2008 9:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
The hospital is who is going to get sued, GSB27. It will be sued by the dead woman's family. Why? Because the woman died. If it were your sister or wife, you would understand the actions the hospital is taking, which have nothing to do with Hillary.
Hillary is not slandering the hospital.
In other news, Eric Kleefeld 's headline is very misleading, possibly intentionally to get a rise out of us.
April 6, 2008 1:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry, memoryaid, but the story you linked to doesn't prove at all that Clinton told the story after she learned it was a problem!
Other news reports claim that she has in fact stopped telling it.
April 6, 2008 1:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
And Sen. Clinton STILL told that same "fable" last night at 9:45 = when did the NYT give them notice what they were putting out? Do we really have to doubt every single word she utters? Remember Geffen: the Clintons lie with such ease.....
April 5, 2008 9:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
God yes, Amen to that!
April 5, 2008 10:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
The exact Geffen prhase was that the pair are "practiced liars."
And Sen. Bob Kerrey of Nebraska called Bill "an exceptionally good liar." Hillary is certainly trying hard to measure up to his standard.
April 6, 2008 12:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Technically she wasn't lying, in the sense that she was just repeating a story that someone had told her and that she hadn't bothered to have checked for accuracy.
But what this has in common with the Bosnia sniper story is a complete lack of common sense. We don't send first ladies and their sixteen-year-old daughters (and Sinbad!) into war zones where sniper fire would put their lives in danger. And hospitals don't refuse to treat pregnant women if they can't come up with $100 in cash.
If lying about Bosnia (and other things) doesn't disqualify her, surely the utter lack of common sense must.
April 5, 2008 9:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
well technically she was lying now because they say they tried to check up the storys credibility but weren't able. How come? They couldn't get hold of the hospital CEO? I doubt that. Lie, lie, lie.
April 6, 2008 3:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hard to decide which is worse...deliberately lying or failing to get all the facts.
Brings to mind Iran-Contra and Reagan and more recently warnings about 9/11 and finally, the Iraq WMD's. All cases where it was left to the American public to decide if the president is lying or a fool.
If I were a Clinton supporter, this kind of stuff would kill it for me. I dont' want to have to guess why my president either does stupid things or tells me untruths.
April 6, 2008 9:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Clinton crew don't seem to have respected the hospital enough to have first checked to see whether the story was true.
Is this yet another example of HC's "CinC" propensity to assume she's automatically right, so why do any homework?
And to surround herself with yes-people who lack the courage to tell her she's going off half-cocked?
April 5, 2008 9:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sad story.
April 5, 2008 9:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
First true thing you've ever said about the Hillary campaign.
April 5, 2008 10:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree. I remember the 90s well. When I was much younger than I am today, I was filled with the same hope and anticipation regarding the then-incoming Clinton Administration. They brought a youthful energy and integrity to the White House that was sorely lacking after years of Bush and Reagan.
Fast forward to today and the Clintons have become what we despised back then. They have became political insiders. They're not evil, they're not corrupt. They're just not one of 'us' anymore.
So many Clinton fans are attacking Obama supporters without realizing that they (we, actually) only want what Clinton supporters wanted so desperately back in 1992. Change. Hope. Optimism. Dreams. Opportunity. America.
Hillary can't offer change, she's become the ULTIMATE insider now.
It is Barack Obama that is that young, energetic, hard-working, inspirational and optimistic upstart daring to change a broken system.
The Clintons have become the Kennedys. Elder statesman that harken back to a better day, but that have long since past the time when they can effectively bring about the goals and dreams of the young people in this country. It's because it has been 16 years since they've ever had to worry about making ends meet. Obama? Until his book came out they were strictly Middle class. The Clintons have been connected to Washington politics for almost 20 years, pretty much controlling ever aspect of Democratic politics for 14 years. Obama? He's been into national politics for a little more than 4 years. Long enough to know his way around, and long enough to know it's broken.
Obama is Bill Clinton 2.0. Everything the Boomers wanted in Clinton is what Gen-X and Millenials wants in Obama. He's not someone to be feared, or ridiculed for lack of experience. How much experience did Bill have when he entered the White House? 2-time Governor of perhaps the least significant state in the Union? Really? But back then we justified Clinton's lack of experience the same way young voters diminish Obama's lack of experience today. We were right then, and young voters are right today.
Bill Clinton was a great President in his time.
If Barack Obama can be 3/4 the President Bill was, then America will be in great hands.
It's time for those of us that remember the great parts of the Clinton Dynasty to pass that torch to the younger voters and HELP THEM accomplish their dreams instead of trying to relive an age long gone. It's time to mend our fences and elect Barack Obama as the next President of the United States.
April 5, 2008 11:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
And here we go... Drudge has already picked up on the New York Times coverage of this disturbing story -
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/05/us/politics/05woman.html?_r=1&ei=5090&en=7824b4f8ea3b363d&ex=1365134400&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin
April 5, 2008 10:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jed Report states that HRC told the story again last night (Friday, April 4) at 9 PM Eastern, just a couple hours before the NYT story came online containing her campaign's acknowledgement that they couldn't dispute the hospital's denial.
http://www.jedreport.com/
Ouch and double ouch.
April 5, 2008 10:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Paging idiotic
(where's the veep when you need him most?)
April 5, 2008 10:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
this story is too messed up from all angles for me. NO EXCELLENCE!!
April 6, 2008 3:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
And now Senator Clinton wants to run the country like she ran her campaign? This is a case where past performance is an indication of future returns! The campaign failed to foresee that small states could matter, that small donors could matter, that caucus states could matter, that this might not be wrapped up by super Tuesday (what would they do if Iran behaved differently than they did foresee?), the stories will be fact checked, that repeating a "misstatement" does not make it true, that a leader is shielded in a cocoon of trusted advisors, where loyalty trumps competence?! Remember Solis-Doyle - no one dared to tell HRC just how bad the campaign finances were? Where did we see all this before... (hint: seven 1/2 years)
April 5, 2008 10:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jesus Christ! Time for these people to leave us alone, go enjoy their $109 million.
FAKE FAKE FAKE, this has always been my issue with this monster! Evertyhing has always been calculated, planned, practiced...etc. She really needs to fire her acting coach, and probably fire Penn while at it!
You know, this may not sound right, but it is not surprising that she gets the lion's share of the less educated voters.
SHE HAS BEEN FOOLING THE VOLUNARABLE...The hard working people who can only hear and see the sound bites on the 9 PM newscast!
Fuck off Hillary, go away!
April 5, 2008 10:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
I just joined. Do they let Obama people post offensive rants?
I was hoping this would be an intelligent alternative to DU.
April 5, 2008 10:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
They let you, but it usually isn't too bad. I'm an Obama supporter though, so I don't know what your tolerance for it is.
This is very sad though. As someone pointed out on another blog I read, there are enough health care horror stories out there, I don't know why she used one that hadn't been verified.
Also, its pretty rare to get turned away from an emergency room when you are in distress. They generally treat you and then repossess your house if you can't pay...Sucks, but ya know, there are 1,000,000 true stories out there.
April 5, 2008 10:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's rare because it's illegal. It's especially a bad idea when it's a pregnant woman (hospitals are fully aware of potential obstetric liability). That doesn't mean you will get adequate care, necessarily, but you will not be refused an examination.
April 5, 2008 11:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, I rather thought it was illegal. I think you hear about that sort of thing in the news occasionally. But isn't it odd that Hillary Clinton, who says she knows a thing or two about health care in this country, doesn't know on it's face that this story is bogus? Shouldn't alarm bells have gone off the moment someone repeated the story to her or when they wrote her talking points for a speech that included this claim?
How can she claim to be "ready on day one" when she doesn't understand the most basic facts about health care?
April 6, 2008 12:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
I didn't want to say it never happens because I've heard about it (wasn't there an instance in Sicko where someone's ambulance was rerouted because the hospital they were going to wasn't in their network or something?)
Though that is a case of a person who had insurance.
April 6, 2008 10:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
There is a federal law that was passed in 1986 in response to stories such as this (and actually, even worse than this). It's the emergency treatment and labor act of 1986 (EMTALA). It's a stand alone federal law, which can be enforced by patients, and is a qualifying condition for any hospital that has an emergency room.
The hospital has to examine any patient to determine the patient's condition, and provide stabilizing care before sending the patient home or to another institution. That's not to say that there aren't abuses, but the true story of lack of access is patients who do not seek medical care well in advance of emergencies, and the fact that even when they go to an emergency room, they are unlikely to receive the kind of ongoing care necessary to maintain their health, especially if they have chronic conditions. HRC used stories like this in her ill-fated first effort at health care reform and they didn't work.
April 6, 2008 12:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Or at least the people she's hired around her, who are supposed to thoroughly understand her and her stances, should have picked up on it. Her staff handles details, filters information for her. Once again this points to poor staff choices (can you say Mark Penn?) and again illustrates that she is not the best candidate.
April 6, 2008 3:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Best.Nick.Ever.
April 6, 2008 9:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Welcome to the blog.
Well, they call Clinton supporters trolls and 6 have called me racist but like Obama, they can do nothing wrong. Obama's unity message is not in play here. Its a hatefest for the Clintons like the other so called biased "progressive" blogs.
BTW folks, Freaktown had to break this story on this blog:
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/04/warmonger.php
A bigger story than this sad one but they will not post it here for some reason.
Mmmmm.
April 5, 2008 10:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
After the darkly brooding and dangerously on-topic Sad Story cameo, Gotalife returns to action hero status in this fine performance touching on Innocence Abused and other notable performances of Troll in the Looking Glass. With the new Schultz Strawman at his side, he invites us down another Road Less Traveled - but can they find the Magic Mirror and return to reality in time?
Known Troll: +5
Contrarian Troll Modifier: +3
Contrarian Monolithic Ref. Modifier: +2
Intellectual Dishonesty: +10
Strawman/FUD Modifier: +5
Seeking Refuge in Scorn: +25
Innocence Abused Modifier: +15
No, YOU'RE a Troll Modifier: +25
Bitter Modifier: +15
Artful Dodger Modifier: +15
-------------------------------
Troll Rating: 120
April 6, 2008 8:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
After Fake Sinbad, you're my favorit TPM sockpuppet EVAR!
April 6, 2008 1:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
And by favorit, I of course also mean favorite.
April 6, 2008 1:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
I believe this was your first post here at TPM:
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/04/nyt-declares-war-on-working-cl.php
You coyly asked Freetospeak:
"I just joined. Do they let Obama people post offensive rants?
I was hoping this would be an intelligent alternative to DU."
There's a couple of words that best describe folks like you.
Option A: hyp·o·crite Pronunciation Key - [hip-uh-krit]
–noun 1. a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, esp. a person whose actions belie stated beliefs.
2. a person who feigns some desirable or publicly approved attitude, esp. one whose private life, opinions, or statements belie his or her public statements.
and of course:
Option B: Troll
1a. Noun
One who posts a deliberately provocative message to a newsgroup or message board with the intention of causing maximum disruption and argument.
1b. Noun
A person who, on a message forum of some type, attacks and flames other members of the forum for any of a number of reasons such as rank, previous disagreements, sex, status, ect.
A troll usually flames threads without staying on topic, unlike a "Flamer" who flames a thread because he/she disagrees with the content of the thread.
1c. Noun
A member of an internet forum who continually harangues and harasses others. Someone with nothing worthwhile to add to a certain conversation, but rather continually threadjacks or changes the subject, as well as thinks every member of the forum is talking about them and only them. Trolls often go by multiple names to circumvent getting banned.
Y'up, those pretty much cover it, you (choose option A and/or B).
April 5, 2008 10:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
I was going to respond to this troll until I looked at his single vulgar, violent, and throughly unimaginative blog entry.
April 5, 2008 11:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you!
April 6, 2008 9:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Funny, I just left DU, BECAUSE of posts like this one!
P.S. Ready to sob on day one!
April 6, 2008 9:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, we can see that from your first blog post.
April 6, 2008 10:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
I love the way her campaign spokesperson casts doubt on the hospital's "version" of the story!! Why can't they ever man up and admit when they are wrong???
April 5, 2008 10:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Stop the Tuzla Terror before she lies again
April 5, 2008 10:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hilary didn't lie; she misspoke. This is especially understandable given that she is sleep-deprived from talking on the 3:00 AM every night.
April 5, 2008 10:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
She mis-remembered.
April 6, 2008 12:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
She misbehaved.
April 6, 2008 2:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
And now we're misunderestimating her, I suppose?
:)
April 6, 2008 7:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
She misused the truth.
April 6, 2008 3:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Tuzla's just making Greg's job more difficult every day isn't she!
I guess that's why Greg gets paid the big bucks.
How can Democrats continue to take that woman seriously?
April 5, 2008 10:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
A must-read by David Brooks about HRC's health care initiative - now and then:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/05/opinion/05brooks.html?_r=1&ref=opinion&oref=slogin
April 5, 2008 10:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nothing David Brooks writes is a "must-read."
April 6, 2008 1:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
whoa! Incoming!
She might yet get that purple heart if all this sniper fire keeps up.
April 5, 2008 10:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
She would get the Purple Heart, but since the hospital turned her away because she didn't bring in her insurance card, well, you can figure out how this sad story turns out.
April 6, 2008 10:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is not anything like the Bosnia story, as it was second hand.
Sure, her folks did not bother to vet the story, perhaps because it fit her narrative, or perhaps because they were stretched, or perhaps because they just didn't bother. Stupid in any way.
As someone who supported Al Gore in 2000 I am extremely sensitive to the press coverage of candidates and their personal stories on the trail. The Bosnia story was just plain idiotic. This story is less so, but when you se Hillary tell it, it seems like she was told a version of this story and it became more horrible each time on the trail. I will be looking out for all of the versions of this story and its evolution in her stump speech.
A pattern is developing. The press will latch on. I am a hugely partisan Obama supporter and I can see hat the press will use this angle to try and drive her out of the race. As far as I am concerned there are many many other reasons this race should be over, but this story is not one of them.
April 5, 2008 10:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think a Deputy Sheriff was the source for Clinton but just glanced at this non issue. I am surprised you are admitting media bias even though it is painfully obvious. Of course, all the Obama biased blogs are running this sad story but ignoring Obama caving on the warmonger comment. Go figure.
There is hope for a little intellectual honesty on this blog.
Good for you.
April 5, 2008 11:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Caving?
He apologized when a staffer called Clinton a "Monster", why would it be any different if someone introducing him called McCain a "Warmonger".
It doesn't change the fact that we believe that Ms. Power and Mr. Schultz were right.
It just means that he's trying to run his campaign with a little civility.
Diffr'nt strokes I guess...
April 5, 2008 11:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Please, what do you call a man singing bomb Iran?.
Get real for once in your life.
Damn, do you listen to him and Lieberman?
WTF? They are both warmongers.
Obama is weak and you know it.
It was posted at the obama post, read the comments, all the Obama supporters agree he is a warmonger.
Oh, thats right, Obama can do nothing wrong here.
Pitiful.
April 5, 2008 11:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's election-year diplomacy.
If Obama comes out and reiterates what Schultz said, it fires up the GOP and gets them raring to go in November.
Instead, Obama can throw water on what is basically a non-issue and show a little class by distancing himself from a cheap-shot.
Is it true? Hell yes it's true. But isn't it more likely we beat McCain in November if the GOP faithful don't have any real reason to come out to vote? Why give them that reason over something trivial.
That's the difference between being a "Fighter" and being a "Boxer". Hillary is willing to take on all challengers and fights and fights and fights, even when the issue is irrelevant and stupid.
Obama, the boxer, surely analyzed this for what it is. Fluff. Throw out a pleasantry and pay homage to McCain's long long service to the country. Let the issue die down in 12 hours or less, and be ready to strike when it counts.
Getting all riled up about this, when there's absolutely nothing to be gained electorally is stupid.
Thus, the boxer is again playing the game much smarter than the fighter.
and if you check all of my posts ever typed, I have NEVER said Obama can do no wrong. He just happens to do way less wrong than Clinton or McCain.
April 6, 2008 1:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Another pivotal performance from Gotalife, blending his now classic Honorable Nitwit with the much-loved Monolithic Rival. In this touching two-parter, Gotalife masterfully weaves concepts of hope and pity into a lush tapestry of social insight, daring the TPM audience to look in the mirror and confront the essential questions of human existence. It's a bright Spotlight to be sure, but with Gotalife's masterful guidance, the TPM audience can count on a steady hand to lead them back through the darkness.
Known Troll: +5
Contrarian Troll Modifier: +3
Contrarian Monolithic Ref. Modifier: +2
Intellectual Dishonesty: +10
Willful Misinterpretation: +5
Seeking Refuge in Scorn: +25
Enfant Provocateur Modifier: +15
Bitter Modifier: +15
Honorable Nitwit: +15
Artful Dodger Modifier: +15
-------------------------------
Troll Rating: 110
April 6, 2008 9:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
Please, what do you call a man singing bomb Iran?.
Someone who remembers that version from the 1980 campaign, when it was originally popularized?
Damn, do you listen to him and Lieberman?
WTF? They are both warmongers.
Yes they are. And letting a subordinate fire the shot while you exercise plausible deniability is one of the oldest tricks in the political book. The subordinate falls on his/her sword, and the leader laments how such a patriotic, loyal individual could make such an unfortunate (but understandable in light of their zeal and dedication) mistake.
What about this seems at all abnormal?
April 6, 2008 3:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Where is Troll Critic?
We need you!!
April 5, 2008 11:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary has many worse flaws than the retelling of a flawed story.
I think about what would happen to me, a decent human being, if I was put through the ringer of national politics (that would be impossible as I went to a state school, took acid once, and work in the entertainment industry).
Greenwald sees the big picture here. we are obsessed with bowling prowess & second hand stories while McCain is skating to a lead in the general.
Perhaps even the Clinton partisan & Obama partisan can agree that the media is missing the big picture.
What say you, gotalife? Shall we retreat to more neutral avatars? I will if you will.
April 6, 2008 12:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
cswartout, don't you see that you've plastered TROLL across Obama's and Wright's faces?
April 6, 2008 3:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes. This is in response to gotalife's new avatar.
I am as surprised as anyone that he said something nice about one of my posts. He's still a troll in my book, though.
April 6, 2008 8:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
I know what you were trying to do—call gotalife a troll—but it actually looks like you're calling Obama a troll! lol!
April 6, 2008 10:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
Allow me to argue that this story DOES undermine her candidacy, because it again it proves that she's not politically savvy enough to not openly embellish.
She should have know this story is iffy, given that she's such a health wonk. She should have at least try to look into the regulation if she wasn't sure.
We might not grill her over it now, but she'll be grilled over it in the general, and if (God forbid) she wins, during her presidency.
We don't want a candidate OR a president that is so detached from reality that they just latch onto stories that help them make their point, without regard to their veracity! NO MORE BUSH THINKING IN THE WHITE HOUSE!
April 6, 2008 12:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Her folks didn't vet it? Shouldn't the candidate herself know this story is bogus without the need of any vetting? She does claim to know something about health care, no? This is pretty basic stuff that she should know.
April 6, 2008 12:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
I support Obama so I am immediately sympathetic to this line of reasoning. But my guy misspoke about his father's coming to America on the generosity of the Kennedy family ( it was not deliberate in any way that I could see).
I give Hillary the benefit of the doubt on this story. Bosnia & Mark Penn are entirely different matters. Don't get me wrong. I am a thoroughly committed Obama supporter, but not every negative story about Hillary is truly negative. I am still a Democrat after all.
April 6, 2008 1:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm getting really tired of everyone being so suspicious of her truthfulness. Now some people are making a lot of Senator Clinton's new account of hearing Martin Luther King when she was 14 years old. So I have decided to tell the truth of what I know on this subject.
The fact is that Hillary is being commendably modest. Forty years ago yesterday, she intercepted a piece of paper on which plans to assassinate MLK were outlined, and she was running through the Memphis streets to warn King (in bare feet, because she had just given her shoes to a transgendered beggar -- who was a mixed black, hispanic, and Asian decorated veteran union member -- while curing his alcoholism simply using her arts of persuasion). Unfortunately she was too late to warn Dr. King, arriving only in time to shinny up a drain-pipe to the balcony, jump in front of the great leader, and take the bullet. Since, however, she had starved herself so rigorously in order to send food to Biafrans, the bullet passed right through her emaciated body and killed the hero.
I know this is all true because my aunt, who lived in Hillary's college dorm and is a fervent supporter, told me how Marian Anderson and Golda Meir used to go up to Wellesley to visit Hillary, and they would sit around in their pajamas late at night eating grapes that Cesar Chávez had picked especially for Hillary and ask her to tell them again about the time she had almost saved MLK singlehandedly. (She always shyly demurred, however, when they begged to see the bullet hole.)
My aunt also tells me that Hillary, with her habitual commendable reticence, saved for only her most intimate friends the thrilling tale -- still not revealed to the public -- of how she, had rescued Anne Frank. (She has never more than hinted, however, that the entire Romanov family is at this moment hiding in her garage in Chappaqua.) The good news, though, is that the Rodgers and Hammerstein estates are now busy revising The Sound of Music to do justice to Hillary's role in the Von Trapp escape.
April 5, 2008 10:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Man, I just cracked a rib laughing my ass off! Thanks for the imagery!
April 5, 2008 11:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good stuff.
But don't forget how she heroically landed that campaign plane after a Cessna collided with its cockpit in midair, and the time she lead those survivors to safety when that luxury liner capsized, *and* the time she fended off those post-apocalyptic marauders, leading those settlers in that refinery to safety.
Oh, and despite conflicting reports, she was, in fact, Deep Throat.
April 6, 2008 12:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wow! Great story, Baron Munchausen!
April 6, 2008 10:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
My immediate reaction to her MLK story was: "Hoo Hah, here comes another whopper." I was sure I wasn't alone in that assessment.
April 6, 2008 3:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
O such a disingenuous little lamb!
you know there's a great feature here - you can put up your own blog post once you join and rant away and that way you don't take up thread space.
:)
April 5, 2008 10:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rabbitsmorgasbord got it right above. The real problem with Hillary repeating this story is what it says about her judgment and about her knowledge of the health care world. $100 is way short of what an ER visit costs - it's chump change to any hospital. No one is going to get turned away from an ER because of $100. But with so many real health care horror stories out there, why not vet one or two properly before it becomes a part of your stump speech If you believe in universal health care, why set yourself up for attacks from the right on your ostensible signature issue by repeating a story you aren't sure is true?
April 5, 2008 11:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ok, DirkVA, you get one of these too:
(-.-)(_ _)(-.-) I bow in your direction. Well done.
April 5, 2008 11:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Should she get nominated (but she won't,) this fake story would be played by Republicans to no end as prove that we don't really need to fix Health Care: The troubles of the system are only feature of Hillary's imagination.
When you haven't been able to vet a story, you would do better not using it.
April 5, 2008 11:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's her latest:
April 5, 2008 11:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
One simple question comes to mind:
If you criticized it before Barack Obama, Sen. Clinton, why did you vote for a measure named the Authorization to Use Military Force in Iraq?
Forget the spin, the triangulation, the feeling of the political winds....
WHY?
April 5, 2008 11:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYsoAeLEa3k
you know it's bad when you have to say "history will prove me right"...
April 6, 2008 12:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's a pretty powerful video. I watched with my wife just now and looking at all of those coffins of young lives cut down before their time is gut-wrenching.
Anyone that doesn't vote Democrat this year is asking for more caskets and more young soldiers dying and being maimed for a lie and the laziness of those in Congress that didn't take the time to read up on the issue.
April 6, 2008 1:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
It wasn't just that she didn't read up on it. There was a political calculation made. BushCo was smart in setting the vote before Congressional elections just a year after 9/11. But Hillary, like embarrassingly too many democrats, was spineless in voting for the war (yes, Bush sold it as a means to apply "pressure" to Saddam and actually avoid war, but every thinking person knew that was total BS -- Bush wanted war).
Hillary had Presidential ambitions then and didn't want to seem weak (militarily), so she voted weak, too weak to stand up to what thinking liberals knew was BS. I think she figured then that even if the war went south, what with so many other democrats voting for it, she'd have political cover when she ran for President. Only prob with that calculation is that she didn't count on an upstart challenger who was not a part of the establishment and the political calculations of the time. Oops. It'd almost be funny if it hadn't been so tragic for those who have died for her political calculations.
April 6, 2008 2:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
O you are kidding me?
Rotflmao - next she'll be saying she voted against the war and he didn't!
O Hillary, honey - please give it up before you do or say anything else cause I want to hold onto some shred of my illusions about you and Bill.
April 5, 2008 11:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
no shit.
A friend just had a hysterectomy - the bill for the two days she was there, just the rooms - operating room, recovery and overnight - $14,000. That doesn't count the surgeon's charge or the other doctor's charges for every visit, every order. Then the drugs, the whole thing.
That's a stupid amount of money. That doesn't pay for parking for a day to visit someone anymore hardly.
April 5, 2008 11:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
$100 is the co-pay (for those who have insurance).
April 6, 2008 3:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
So if this story she's been telling passes her standard for "vetting" then how much stock can we put in her claims that she's been vetted?
How much credence can we give anything she says with one thing after another being proven to be lies... errrrr... sorry... cases where she has "misspoke."
April 5, 2008 11:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly.
After not having wrapped it up on Super Tuesday, her main strategy seems to be to prolong the process with any and every tortured logic Penn can dream up and just hope for Obama to implode, leaving her as the last person standing.
Well, apparently the other shoe is dropping on her and her "mistatements". She's dropped like, what, 10 points since the Bosnia lie came to light.
The longer she stays in it, the worse she looks, and the worse for her and Bill's legacy. She's entitled to do that, but what a shame.
April 6, 2008 2:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Like most posts calling Clinton I liar, she will be proven correct or admit the mistake.
Obama will get a free pass on all his lies, as usual, but when Clinton attacks this media, pointing out this obvious bias, they will attack her.
Yet, she will fight on against all this bias and still win.
Amazing isn't it?
You have unity with the same media that gives mcwar, w and cheney a free pass too.
Congrats for finally having unity no matter how pathatic it is.
April 5, 2008 11:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wait, when did Clinton acknowledge she supported NAFTA?
Did she ever apologize for saying "Shame on you, Obama!" when he was telling the truth?
And if that quote about her saying she was against the Iraq war before Obama is accurate, God help her.
That's such an obvious lie, not even you will be able to stand by her.
April 5, 2008 11:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gergen verified she was against it but keep telling the lie.
April 6, 2008 12:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Re NAFTA, one supporter says she was against it back in the day vs. a whole bunch of people who heard her actively lobby for it plus a book she "wrote" that calls it one the big successes of her husband's presidency.
Oh, wait! I know, the ghost writer miswrote, and the campaign didn't vet her memoir properly. I mean, they try to vet these things, but it's not always possible.
Gotcha. Okay, Hillary. Get some sleep now. Don't let the sniper fire keep you up.
April 6, 2008 12:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Gergen was at a meeting where she made comments that were "totally pro-NAFTA."
April 6, 2008 12:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
You keep lying about what Gergen said.
He did not say she opposed NAFTA. He said she was "unethusiastic" about it but *only* because she wanted the White House to concentrate only on her healthcare initiative. She thought that the White House could not get both NAFTA and healthcare passed in the same term so she wanted healthcare to take priority.
Gergen never said she opposed it on policy grounds, which is the lie she told to Ohio voters.
April 6, 2008 1:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
With venerable rival Dembillc left standing in his long shadow, Gotalife soars in this masterful performance, clearly reveling in a newfound comfort in his Leading Troll skin. It's a scathingly personal journey, wrought with all the bitter Refuge in Scorn we can expect from a performer of this caliber, but will it win him the respect of the TPM audience and clear his rivals from the stage once and for all?
Known Troll: +5
Contrarian Troll Modifier: +3
Contrarian Monolithic Ref. Modifier: +2
Intellectual Dishonesty: +10
Willful Misinterpretation: +5
Strawman/FUD Modifier: +5
Seeking Refuge in Scorn: +25
Bitter Modifier: +20 (Marked Improvement!)
Honorable Nitwit: +15
------------------------------
Troll Rating: 90
April 6, 2008 10:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
How can Clinton say that with a straight face?
She was supporting the war at least until 2006!
Ugh. I really hope this quote is not true. I don't think I can keep saying "I'll vote for Clinton over McCain" otherwise.
April 5, 2008 11:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
so was obama.
April 6, 2008 12:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
No moron, he was supporting the troops in the only way he was allowed to.
The Preznit said out loud he was going to veto any "retreat" bill.
So he voted to fund the troops and provide armor and needed equipment. What would you have wanted Obama to do?
He voted to not let the bus drown in the swamp. He didn't steer in into the ditch. But Hillary voted for it.
April 6, 2008 12:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
don't get so defensive, sweetheart. he could have not voted, which he's quite accustomed to.
April 6, 2008 1:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Pretty pathetic. You can defend Hillary, so you bring up something you know is a strawman argument, hoping that it will deflect from the real issue here. Hillary's dishonesty.
Not this time.
And the condescending 'sweetheart' comment...you can shove that one up your ass.
Democrats don't put up with sexist, racist or stupid comments. We're the Democratic party and we're taking back America for EVERYONE.
April 6, 2008 1:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
if the kitchen is too hot for you, sweetheart, then get out.
i'll say what i please, exactly the way you do.
I AM A DEMOCRAT AND WE ARE TAKING BACK OUR COUNTRY!
GO HILLARY!
April 6, 2008 3:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
Look, count me as among the people who think this story makes Clinton look more stupid than dishonest. The Tuzla thing was dishonest. This was just stupid.
And while stupid is not as bad as dishonest(stupid is when you "misspeak", dishonest is when you lie), I think they really should have done the legwork to make sure nobody called them out on their story. When the right-wing called out Obama on his story about the trooper borrowing enemy rifles, Obama was able to call the guy up and the story checked out. Nobody is perfect, but that sort of thing is tactically smart.
April 5, 2008 11:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
abotron, I agree that it is stupid. It is also demostrates a lack of discipline on both HRC's and the her campaign's part.. Unforunately for HRC and her supporters, it is another example of the willingness to play fast and loose with facts for political gain. Reminds me a lot of GWB.
April 6, 2008 9:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
But of course is dishonest!
Stupid AND dishonest; along the lines of "depends on what the meaning of 'is' is."
Stretching facts or spinning them around to make them fit your "truth" is dishonest and it delivers lies; nothing else.
If she 'misspoke,' a serious apology (and not the bull given by her campaign) is what is needed, instead retelling of the story once again.
April 6, 2008 12:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
I vote for "stupid" and "dishonest."
April 6, 2008 3:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
This story is no big deal. I've read the whole account, and it's nothing.
April 5, 2008 11:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh thank God! Case closed then!
April 6, 2008 12:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, but they think being informed is reading this blog.
Sad.
April 6, 2008 12:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
as opposed to gotalife, who thinks Fox news is "fair and balanced."
And no, I'm not kidding. He actually thinks that, even though they continue to slander the Clintons.
I don't get it either.
April 6, 2008 12:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, they hate both Dem candidates.
Like Rendell said.
Fair and balance just on their hate of both Dems, nothing else.
April 6, 2008 12:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Here's Rendell's full statement. I'll let others decide if gotalife is misrepresenting the statement:
"I think during this entire primary coverage, starting in Iowa and up to the present -- FOX has done the fairest job, and remained the most objective of all the cable networks. You hate both of our candidates. No, I'm only kidding. But you actually have done a very balanced job of reporting the news, and some of the other stations are just caught up with Senator Obama, who is a great guy, but Senator Obama can do no wrong, and Senator Clinton can do no right."
gotalife - do you agree with Rendell or not?
April 6, 2008 1:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wrong. What was perhaps an isolated incident with her "misspeaking" about the Bosnia story now becomes a pattern of deceit in the minds of the media and voters.
April 6, 2008 12:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is a parody post, right?
April 6, 2008 1:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
The IRON ***** Strikes again!!!To put a twist on a Quote by another famous DEM:She will LIE today She will LIE Tomorrow and She will continue to LIE forever.So what else is new huh guys?The Iron ***** will continue this kind of behavior until 7734 freezes over!!!
April 6, 2008 12:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
"I just joined. Do they let Obama people post offensive rants?"
If, by "offensive," you mean reality-based posts: you bet your ass they do!
Love and kisses,
The "Obama People"
April 6, 2008 12:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
At best, Hillary Clinton was incompetent. At worst, she was dishonest.
Sound like any current presidential administration you know?
April 6, 2008 12:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
With all due respect to idiotic [sic]: DirkVA for Vice-President!
April 6, 2008 12:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Dirk,thanks for opening my Kool-Aid clouded eyes to the wonder that is Hillary. Thank god I have'nt yet cast my vote,as I almost fell for that half-breed huckster. Like the song sez;"hillary 4 U & me, bring back our democracy!"
April 6, 2008 12:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Had enough?
April 6, 2008 1:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's a forgivable sin: Somebody told her a story, and she repeated it without checking it out.
It's a forgivable sin: Somebody told Bush Iraq had WMD and links to al Qaeda, and he went to war without checking it out.
It's time to get a competent president we can trust.
April 6, 2008 1:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry ... can't post now ... sniper fire ... send marines ...must ... keep ... head ... down.
April 6, 2008 1:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think it matters anymore. Obama has half of the the democratic electoral pie. In the general election he will have one quarter of the pie. Thanks for the legacy Josh Marshall. To bad you don't know how to read an exit poll.
April 6, 2008 2:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Every deceased logician just rolled over in their grave.
April 6, 2008 2:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Of course the hospital is disputing this story. A patient of theirs died. Only 13 maternal deaths occur for every 100,000 births in this country, so the woman should not have died. Something went seriously wrong. So the hospital lawyers moved swiftly to get a PR statement out, absolving them of responsibility, before the wrongful death lawsuit gets filed.
There is something wrong with this story. The woman should not have died.
April 6, 2008 3:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
The only thing wrong with the story is your inability to accept that Hillary is once again fabricating to deceive the public.
April 6, 2008 9:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
You, vicissitudes, are a misogynist and a cretin, as your final sentence from this comment here reveals. Get lost or clean up your act.
April 6, 2008 10:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
re: "She learned to lie to cover up all of bills semen trails."
It's a rude comment, for sure, but it also happens to be true. Ever read or seen Primary Colors. Are you old enough to remember the real thing, in '92 or later during Monica-gate? I have and do. And I believe her running for Pres now is Bill's payback for all of her support during his previous shenanigans.
April 6, 2008 2:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yep, I'm old enough. To be perfectly honest, I don't care about Bill's semen trails, and I'm always momentarily confused when anyone does care.
I realize there's a big morality issue for lots of people about the Clintons, and that's where all that uncensored rudeness comes from. I don't feel the same way, though. I just can't get worked up about adultery like some people can. I get worked up instead about war, exploitation, human rights, and people who are powerless and don't have a voice.
April 6, 2008 11:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Mothers do die peripartum even in the best of hospitals. There is plenty about this story we don't know. She might have had a prior life threatening condition. I don't think that the hospital could release that information easily. There should be a prompt investigation by the Dept of Health of Ohio, probably already is. That is probably how the hospital found out about the story. Remember, Clinton did not mention the name of the hospital.
April 6, 2008 12:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
But that's a key point to this whole story: Clinton was blaming the hospital for letting the woman die over $100.
In the press, if you print a story like that and have not backed it up with the facts, you get your ass sued.
Why didn't she or her people find out if it was true or not before running it? Did she not know that ERs don't turn people away like that (or, at least, aren't supposed to). Did she not have any other true healthcare horror story to tell (we know there are plenty)?
This is just incompetence from Clinton.
April 6, 2008 1:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're wrong, Bat Guano! Clinton didn't blame the hospital. Did you read the actual NYT article or just the moronic comment thread out of sheer laziness?
Obviously you didn't read the article.
Thanks for your lame contribution, Bat Guano! Now I know never to believe anything you have to say.
April 6, 2008 2:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
The woman had insurance, the Times story indicates. The whole thing is a canard, apparently. It hasn't been said what Hillary's staff did to vet the story ("we tried"), but it seems like next to nothing, or nothing.
Reagan used to stand up and tell phoney tales (welfare queens and the usual right-wing masturbatory fantasies) and the press would point out that they were phoney, and nobody seemed to care and he'd just tell more. Just about every time he spoke, it seemed.
April 6, 2008 4:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
April 6, 2008 1:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
But they are NOT dead because of a lack of $100, which is exactly what Hillary was saying.
Clear fabrication as told by Hillary to her gullible supporters.
April 6, 2008 2:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
well, this just shows how gullible and dihonest left leaning Democrats are. You people love ludicrous stories about how businesspeople are bad and evil. Yes, the people who provide you with energy, pharmaceuticals and financial services, and consumer goods, are all bad and wicked, while you - mostly useless teachers, government employees, housewives and the like - are good and caring. Ugh, brother.
Meanwhile, you are about to elect your first affirmative action baby president. Oh, man, the record so far ain't good. Clarence Thomas, Condi Rice, Donna Brazile, see a pattern here? I can't undrestand your devotion to a ridiculous idea: promoting people to positions and giving them privileges in education and employment because of the race or gender or sex preference rather than their abilities and talents. If I was a law firm client, for example, I would want the best lawyer possible, not a second rater who happens to be a black lesbian and hence good for the firm's recruitment brochure (which as a former corporate lawyer I can assure you is the case).
April 6, 2008 6:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
Whew! I'm just glad that you're not a 'left leaning Democrat,' Milla. It's always good to hear that the morons are on the other side.
Hope you enjoy your trollish stay.
April 6, 2008 7:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
"which as a former corporate lawyer I can assure you is the case"
In other words, we're supposed to believe what you say on your own authority. That's a logical fallacy know in Latin as argumentum ad verecundiam, or in English as argument from authority. Who you are (or were) permits no inference to the truth of what you say. For example: "A rub of hogwash twice a day will cure baldness. I'm a barber; you can trust me." One would think that a corporate lawyer would know at least that much logic. Or were you the type of lawyer who wins by obfuscation rather than reason?
By the way, why former corporate laywer? Did you get all tuckered out defending downtrodden multinationals from the tyranny of the masses? Must have been heartbreaking work.
April 6, 2008 9:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
A notable performance from newcomer Milla, Plumbing the Depths with a performance reminiscent of the finer works of the legendary RaeK, adding a stunning Ethnix meets Vulgaris twist that pushes the genre squarely into the postmodern age. It's an adrenaline-driven rush to the edge, but will it prove too bold a vision of the future to receive the acclaim of the TPM audience?
Suspected Troll: +2
Contrarian Troll Modifier: +3
Contrarian Monolithic Ref. Modifier: +2
Intellectual Dishonesty: +10
Willful Misinterpretation: +5
Strawman/FUD Modifier: +5
Seeking Refuge in Scorn: +25
Bitter Modifier: +15
Honorable Nitwit: +15
Enfant Provocateur Modifier: +15
Ethnix Modifier: +30
Trollus Vulgaris Modifier: +25
-------------------------------------
Troll Rating: 152
April 6, 2008 10:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Aw, jeez, the tired old "democrats hate success."
That self-justifying pablum is so 2003.
April 6, 2008 2:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Milla's comment is just..
wow.
Where's TrollCritic when we need him?
April 6, 2008 7:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
Milla's comment is just..
wow.
Where's TrollCritic when we need him?
April 6, 2008 7:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hi Milla,
You don't have to worry here. We do embrace the views of all lesbians and blacks, not just lawyers :)
April 6, 2008 8:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
well, most black people and most lesbians are quite ignorant and silly, why would you embrace the views of all of them. Example: Obama's fruitcake minister. What a laughable clown, with his clown suit dashiki.
April 6, 2008 9:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ah, a real troll. Pro corporate, hating on others, screaming white power like a typical member of the radical right.
Gaze upon his gop values because this is what a real troll looks like.
Your hatred of Clinton puts you in his category but lets start the conversation about race with this wingnut and see what happens.
It has the audacity to call others ignorant but folks it does not get more ignorant than a member from the radical right.
So, engage with this troll, use the unity message and talk about race. Unite with this troll.
Good luck with that.
April 6, 2008 10:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good job, gotalife.
April 6, 2008 10:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is what we'll see when Obama becomes the nominee. You'll unite with us against these asshats, won't you gotalife?
April 6, 2008 1:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
I still think gotalife is a GOP troll in Hillary clothing. Milla didn't even bother to put on the sheep's clothing so now gotalife can use Milla's extreme to give credence to his own trolling. Just look at gotalife's avatar -- obviously the guy has racial issues in that he thinks Wright is such a detriment to Obama's candidacy, yet he'll feign concern for minorities in America. I'm not buying it, especially as he continues to use what he thinks is a racially divisive avatar (even though that photo makes me proud for two successful African American men).
April 6, 2008 2:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why, indeed, would anyone allow themselves to even be photographed with such a clown?
April 6, 2008 5:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dammit ... an untimely unneccessary death used for political fodder without "vetting" it is NOT the issue. An allegation like that should trigger a full-blown investingation and her staff should know that. As purported health advocates, they failed miserably on this. And since she touts her health care package as cornerstone to her experience ... this DOES matter. The carelessness borders on incompetence and cynicism. Any legal staff on her campaign KNOW to ask for whatever investigations were being conducted ... and they KNOW how to vet stories. She ran with this story like a child running with scissors.
This was Hillary's domestic *red phone* moment and she failed it.
And don't she DARE say it's due to lack of sleep ... if it's gotten too hot, then get out of the kitchen, MissyPantsOnFire.
April 6, 2008 9:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
My goodness, Milla, you are one mean, nasty and hateful repugnican. May the bird of paradise fly up your nose ...
April 6, 2008 9:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
If you can not verify a story, you do not run around and tell everyone it is true. Especially a story such as this one. I hope the hospital sues Hillary for slander. To think about how the people that work at this hospital must have felt to hear Hillary Clinton denounce them as heartless monsters.
An apology should be issued by Hillary Clinton, not a campaign memo or a campaign surrogate.
April 6, 2008 9:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not sure you understand how slander works, GSB27. From what I've seen and read, Clinton did not say, "O’Bleness Memorial Hospital denied Trina Bachtel and her baby the proper medical care and so she died." What I mean is, Clinton never names the hospital or the patient.
From the NYT:
The reason O’Bleness Hospital is publicly clarifying their role in the story is because the hospital will be investigated for negligence, since the baby died there first.
April 6, 2008 1:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, brother, Blue Skies sounds like a typical blther-machine. and yes, I got tired doing legal work for major intl corporations, now I do dealmaking in Eurasia, much more interesting and a lot more money. Eh, and I get to nail girls half my age, which is a nice perk of being good looking, smart and funny. Man, in US most girls are dull, chunky and ignorant. Here in Moscow there's not a girl who is over 54 kilos, and they're all knock-out gorgeous, and uninfected by that loathesome disease, feminism.
April 6, 2008 10:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Lets see, this troll claims to be 29 and half of that is 14.5, so we have a gop child molestor.
Heh, at least you are molesting little girls.
You should be watched if you return to our great country and locked up pervert.
The women in Russia are drunk on vodka so you might have a chance to be a real man and find a real woman of age.
Are you not man enough to handle a grown woman troll?
Pitiful.
April 6, 2008 10:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
This hurts to even ask, but did you just say
Now that is just fucking sad that it would occur to you to say that.
April 7, 2008 12:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Here is this Milla Vermin's posted description of it's self.
Milla
Details
* Location: Belgrade
* Age: 29
* Politics: Sensible
* Party: None
Notice the age. Now go back and read the claims that this sewer rat has made about it's work experience.
But far more troubling than that is: Look at the age factor,and the claim that he is having sex with girls half his age. That makes him a child molesting serial rapist, by his own admission.
April 6, 2008 10:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
As the scene flourishes, the TPM audience is in for a rare treat, as scrappy newcomer Milla continues to break bold new ground, with veteran performer Gotalife leading the charge with a dramatic pushback. Has this Honorable Nitwit found a new source for Uncommon Valor in the face of fierce new rivalry? Or is this Enfant Provocateur merely a Eurotrash Archetype Sockpuppet designed to make our hero seem more reasoned by comparison? Longtime TPM audience members will surely be gripping their chairs as the mystery unfolds.
Known Troll: +5
Contrarian Troll Modifier: +3
Contrarian Monolithic Ref. Modifier: +2
Intellectual Dishonesty: +10
Willful Misinterpretation: +5
Strawman/FUD Modifier: +5
Swarm Modifier: +15 (Rare!)
Bitter Modifier: +15
Eurotrash Archetype Modifier: +25
Trollus Vulgaris Modifier: +25
-----------------------------------
Troll Rating: 110
April 6, 2008 11:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
re: "Sockpuppet designed to make our hero seem more reasoned by comparison"
By design or by chance, gotalife has a new lease on life as a troll in Hillary clothing.
April 6, 2008 3:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ad verecundiam followed by ad hominem -- the cheapest shot in the manual. Also the most fun, I admit.
"Now I do dealmaking in Eurasia..." Would that be post-disbarment for statutory rape?
Milla, you're a satirist, aren't you? You're just too naughty to be real.
April 6, 2008 12:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
well, at least one good thing about Clinton, her supporters don't come in their pants when they see her on youtube. It's extremely distasteful to observe the smug and smarmy attitude of Obama's folk, even more distasteful than the Rev Wright's dashiki. I assure you, when pretty boy screws up foreign policy and the economy, you won't be coming in your collective pants anymore, you'll be shitting bricks : )
April 6, 2008 10:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry, Milla, you've already lost any chance to be taken seriously.
But I suspect you know you have swallowed poison and are trying to spewing in out in your upchucks on this thread. Purge yourself if you must, but we do smell what's in your discharge.
April 6, 2008 10:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Probably a fan of Slobodan Milosevic. Clinton kicked your ass.
April 6, 2008 10:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
And there is a comment I wholeheartedly endorse.
April 6, 2008 11:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
You know very well that this is some kind of Repug troll. I don't think Democrats, Hillary supporters, Obama supporters - say things like that. At least, I want to think we don't. I know why I'm a Democrat- and that's why. I'm liberal and we generally believe in equality and fairness and we really strive for it and nothing about a lot of the shit that gets posted ostensibly from Clinton supporters sounds remotely like any other liberal I've ever known.
It's not that I believe Democrats aren't subject to the same kinds of bigotry we all are - but it seems to me that we are a lot more honest about it. We are willing to see our own shortcomings, instead of pointing fingers at everyone else.
April 6, 2008 10:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
ROF and pissing myself laughing.
Where is this paradise? Where is this place where lovely women are willing to do whatever pleases you? It sounds like a whorehouse. Those are available everywhere.
April 6, 2008 10:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well except for the part where Milosevic was still walking around a free man, yeah.
LOL!
No offense, gotalife -
April 6, 2008 10:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
They got him. Clinton/Clark won that war and if they keep acting up, they will get bombed again.
It was a great military victory and stopped the genocide.
April 6, 2008 11:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, dat's me - An American Woman: a dull, chunky 105 pound appellate lawyer.
April 6, 2008 10:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Why is the Obama Kennedy lie getting no attention in the media or the pro-Obama site Talking Points Memo?
April 6, 2008 11:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
They don't discuss Obama lies here.
Hell, they will not discuss Obama tossing Shultz under the bus like Gradma for his warmonger comment.
They did on CNN and Durbin caved too.
Spineless.
Need a fighter.
April 6, 2008 11:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
What kind of attention would you like it to get? What sane person actually thinks it was a lie? His father has long been dead, and the family tradition about his coming from Africa was clearly slightly off -- though in principle not significantly so.
I don't know about your family, but I'm sure I constantly repeat historically questionable stuff I've been told and assume to be correct that would turn out to have flaws. Are you seriously trying to compare that to making up stories of personal heroism of the most extravagant untruthfulness and even unlikelihood in a feverish effort to make oneself look heroic? Do you have any moral metric at all? Does Obama's actual understanding of his fathers history differ from the documented fact in any way that changes its significance? The same certainly cannot be said for Hillary's famous sally into Bosnia amidst a hail of bullets.
April 6, 2008 11:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's fun for the whole family when sleeper favorite Truthseeker77 and storied veteran Gotalife take to the stage in a one-two punch of wonder and merriment. Will this new Dynamic Duo make All the Right Moves and find their way into the TPM audience's hearts? With the Kennedy Strawman along for the ride, you can be sure you'll laugh your way to finding out.
Known Troll: +5
Contrarian Troll Modifier: +3
Contrarian Monolithic Ref. Modifier: +2
Intellectual Dishonesty: +10
Willful Misinterpretation: +5
Strawman/FUD Modifier: +5
Seeking Refuge in Scorn: +25
Chicken Little Modifier: +15
-------------------------------
Troll Rating: 70
April 6, 2008 11:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Back to the thread topic.
Does anyone know if the family of the poor woman who died, have been asked about what happened. Did the Clinton campaign try to confirm what happened with them, before running with the story. How did the Woman's name become public. I thought that the HIPA laws would have prevented that from happening.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qnSR9QrrutM
I wish all candidates would stay away from these kind of examples. People know that Health care is a mess. There is no need to beat them over the head with examples like this.
A young woman is dead. Should any politician be trying to use that tragedy on the campaign trail.
Were we not grossed out enough, as Democrats, when the Republicans hijacked the tragedy of Terri Schiavo, for their own partisan agenda, that we now seek to emulate their worst practices.
April 6, 2008 11:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Two different issues.
Schiavo was a pro life issue.
A Deputy Sheriff told Clinton about this health care issue.
He said, she said but as usaual, it gives you reason to hate like Milla.
April 6, 2008 11:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
"They got him. Clinton/Clark won that war and if they keep acting up, they will get bombed again."
Actually, the European NATO forces won the day.
I see that you are all to eager to want to resort to bombing. No wonder you said that you will vote for John McCain.
Chicken War Hawks of a Feather Flock together. Senator Hillary Rambo Clinton has also endorsed War Monger McCain for Commander in Chief.
Hillary is the New Lieberman.
April 6, 2008 11:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
You just can't admit Clinton won.
Just like the radical right wingnuts.
Ya'll hate the Clintons just like they do.
I guess that is unity.
April 6, 2008 12:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
re: "No wonder you said that you will vote for John McCain."
Exactamundo. And therin lies the troll.
Yet, gotalife expects us to forget he has let this truth slip and all the while believe he means it every time he talks about democratic unity.
gotalife only implores us to stand behind hillary in order to delay the eventual nomination, allowing mccain to proceed to the general as unscathed as possible.
April 6, 2008 3:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, have you noticed?
At the link you post, Hillary is speaking with an accent!
Kind of like to make her close to the people...
April 6, 2008 1:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
You don't have medical privacy rights after you die. Learned that from Law & Order.
April 6, 2008 1:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not going to argue about Kosovo because I do think Clinton had a siginificant success there.
I wish I could say the same for Iraq and Haiti.
He bombed the shit out of Iraq the whole time he was in office - remember the baby food plant?
I'm not a big fan of Bill's foreign policy except I do know how very well thought of he is around the world and that always gave me pride.
Wish he hadn't gone so far over the edge during this campaign - I really loved the guy until he started revealing some things I had defended him against, that others accused him of. Now I feel a bit foolish for the years I've defended him, but that's the way it goes.
April 6, 2008 11:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
Clinton kept peace and the economy was prosperous.
Which part did you not like?
It can happen again but you get what you vote for.
We know how the Clintons will govern.
But you want to roll the dice on another lying politician spewing the same unity message.
April 6, 2008 11:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
In this engaging performance, Gotalife provides a storied insight into a dangerous world fraught with the ravages of gambling and deception, harkening to our sentimental side to take the audience back to our own Golden Pond along the way. It's a duet of stark realities, and Gotalife once again work the seam flawlessly.
Known Troll: +5
Contrarian Troll Modifier: +3
Intellectual Dishonesty: +10
Willful Misinterpretation: +5
Seeking Refuge in Scorn: +25
Bliss Ninny Modifier: +15
-------------------------------
Troll Rating: 63
April 6, 2008 12:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
What I'd like to know is, were the details of the story she told at rallies (young woman worked at a pizza parlor for minimum wage, went three times and was denied, etc.) included in the story that deputy sheriff told her? Or did she "embroider" and add?
Either way, of course, her staff should have picked up the phone and talked to the hospital before allowing her to use this story over and over.
Whether it's sloppy "vetting" or flatout lying or somewhere in between, it speaks to a lack of both judgment and competence.
And of course needlessly (carelessly) using a false story also undermines the Dem's overall efforts to get health care.
April 6, 2008 11:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
"What I'd like to know is, were the details of the story she told at rallies (young woman worked at a pizza parlor for minimum wage ...)"
For their sake, I hope the pizza joint was not one of those patronized by the Clinton campaign. Because, if they are, they are writing off a big loss right now.
April 6, 2008 3:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
I posted the following last night on another thread but I think these considerations are too important to ignore so I'm revising and extending my remarks and posting them here.
Was it only 11 months ago that Rudy arranged and then canceled a visit to a Iowa farm family because they weren't millionaires and hence wouldn't be a suitable prop for Rudy's anti-estate tax message? I put this in the same kind of category: screwing people thoughtlessly to further your own ambitions.
Hillary throwing this hospital to the wolves probably does much more damage to both the medical facility and the Athens community. Guiliani humiliated and hurt the feelings of a couple of supporters and turned them into enemies. He probably damaged himself considerably too. Even though he was the national frontrunner back in May 2007 he wound up not even contesting IA.
Hillary didn't name the town, hospital or deputy sheriff in that one Wyoming video but it seems to me anybody in that area of OH would already know the bare bones of this horrific story about the dead girl and her dead baby and know exactly what hospital Hillary was attacking. There was ample media coverage locally when it happened that was further fleshed out with Hillary's inaccurate story telling. If the truth hadn't come out the O’Bleness Memorial Hospital could have suffered (and may have anyway) irreparable harm. That's the kind of rumor - especially given the stamp of authority of a presidential candidate who won SE OH overwhelming - that can kill a hospital in a small town like Athens. According to their website O’Bleness started out as a maternity hospital back in 1921 and it's still a major focus of their care. If Hillary's criticism devastated their revenues and drove them out of business it would have left a major hole in Athen's healthcare infrastructure. Traveling an hour to see a doctor because falsehoods drove your local ones out of town makes getting healthcare a more arduous proposition, lessens everybody's quality of life and makes small towns even less viable.
You'd think any candidate with as much experience with healthcare issues as she has would take those possible ramifications into account but I guess when you're in desperation mode serious considerations get thrown to the wind.
April 6, 2008 11:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is the part that pisses me off. If you are going to campaign on health care as an issue of major importance then you better by god know what you're talking about and clearly she doesn't.
$100? In an ER? That buys you an aspirin.
April 6, 2008 11:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's of course better than McCain - he says guaranteed health care is messing with the market - you know that magic thing that is supposed to take care of all us - the Free Market.
About which there is nothing Free.
April 6, 2008 11:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
This whole story reminds me of the kind of crap the press absolutely pummelled Gore with during the 2000 campaign. Unfortunately for Hillary, it comes on the heels of the very real Bosnia exaggeration, making it appear she has a habit of embellishment (to be kind), or lying (to be blunt).
Now comes the news that she claimed she was speaking out against the war before Obama. And just as unfortunately for Hillary, this one is easy to prove false. In fact, it's already getting press, and I suspect, will continue to do so.
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/04/in-oregon-clint.html
Why she does this is anyone's guess : laziness, sloppy campaigning, lax vetting, insecurity, exaggeration or lying. There's just not a good reason, and the sad thing is that it's so unnecessary. Hillary doesn't need to embellish to be a viable candidate, and every incident like this simply diminishes her and her very real accomplishments.
And that's what's really sad about this story. It certainly isn't a characteristic I'd want in a president, but (full disclosure) I'm an Obama supporter. That fact doesn't make this any easier to watch, though. Hillary had many chances for a graceful exit from this primary. I'm afraid that window just closed.
April 6, 2008 11:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
I almost feel like this is Hillary's "Gallon of Milk" moment. Remember George Bush, Sr? He didn't know how much a gallon of milk cost when we were sliding into the last Bush recession.
And it still haunts him.
April 6, 2008 11:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
On thing is very clear--Hillary will say almost anything to get the nomination. Things like truth, verifying facts and consistency have no place in her campaign. Its all about her entitlement to the nomination and her delusional belief that only she can beat McCain and save the what is left of the Democratic party. She claims to be the champion of struggling women, but she is where she is almost entirely because of her marriage to a pig of a man. She said in New Hampshire that the votes in Michigan would not count, now he insists that they must count. She says that she must continue her campaign so that the voters in all states can have their voices heard. But then this weekend she goes to North Dakota and blatantly asks the delegates there to ignore the voters and their status as delegates pledged to Obama and vote for her. She said that small caucus states, like Iowa and Idaho do not matter, but again this weekend she is in Montana asking for votes in that small, irrelevant state's ( with two Democratic senators) upcoming caucuses. --BTW Hillary, it is not working. You lost more ground this weekend when Delaware and Missouri allocated their remaining delegates.
April 6, 2008 11:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
It is a federal crime for a hospital to turn away an emergency patient for inability to pay. I would be extremely surprised if the health care guru senator doesn't know that. Surely her people do. It is an important factor in health care financing. That story should have been a focus of a serious investigation, not idle chatter.
April 6, 2008 11:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
look are her staff.
Mark Penn? Terry McAulife? Every other low life who has ever been hired by a Democratic candidate?
Campaign staff is critical in an election. I didn't realize just how true that is until 2004 and I saw it then and I see it now.
If she is nominated, we're going to lose. Those people don't know how to do anything else.
April 6, 2008 11:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes indeed. The campaign staff calls almost all the shots in modern political runs.
The candidate is like the lone Apollo astronaut in the capsule taking all directions from the launch and mission control crew.
April 6, 2008 12:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Chuck Heston is dead. Maybe now they can pry the gun out of his cold, dead hands.
April 6, 2008 12:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Will they have a 21-gun salute for him ?
April 6, 2008 12:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
I suggested this on another thread, but it's a good day to give to the Brady Campaign in ol' Chuck's honor...
April 6, 2008 1:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Check out this ABC report about Hillary telling the false story.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THzgXqlmacY
Pay particular attention to the clip that shows Hillary sitting on a couch with the Deputy Sheriff. You can see that it is staged for the camera. She is not just meeting someone at a rally. She is sitting on a couch with him, and you can see him struggling to remember his lines.
Look at the shape of the guy, and he is supposed to be a law officer. He looks more like Otis than Barney or Andy.
Look at him again. Would you run with a story this guy told, without checking it out thoroughly.
This looks like another one of those Clinton Camp plants, like the ones they were using to earlier to ask Hillary questions she knew were planted in the audience.
The entire thing looks like another Clinton planted Fairy Tale.
April 6, 2008 12:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't watch fixed noise but one of the wingnuts I argue with on another blog posted this:
"Fox News is sticking up for your girl by showing the cop that lied to her about that girl that died because she didn’t have a hundred bucks."
Once again, all the accused lies are proven wrong or she will admit the mistake.
When will Obama follow her lead ?
I will accept you apoligies, nah, you never admit you are dead wrong as usual.
April 6, 2008 12:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's not so much that she told a false story, as it is she assumed it was true and didn't bother to check it out.
If she's the expert on getting us universal health care, wouldn't she have noted that people don't get turned away from the ER just because they don't have a hundred bucks on them?
The cop that "lied" to her was probably retelling the story as he heard it, just boosting the story to make it better as people subconsciously do.
She should've smelled something wrong with the story. It's a little too good (by good I mean dramatically tragic) to be true.
But she just ran with it. Doing so she showed a type of incompetence, a willful ignorance of reality, that we've seen for too long in the current White house.
April 6, 2008 1:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gotalife digs deep in a performance grappling with issues of blindness and betrayal in a tense political thriller that will leave the TPM audience guessing at every turn. This gripping courtroom scene, part Mr. Smith Goes to Washington crossed with the nuanced subtlety of My Left Foot, builds to an emotional J'accuse that is all too hauntingly real.
Known Troll: +5
Contrarian Troll Modifier: +3
Contrarian Monolithic Ref. Modifier: +2
Intellectual Dishonesty: +10
Seeking Refuge in Scorn: +25
Innocence Abused Modifier: +15
Bitter Modifier: +15
Enthralling J'accuse!: +20 (Rare!)
Honorable Nitwit: +15
Enlisting Enemy Combatant: +50 (New!)
Artful Dodger Modifier: +15
--------------------------------------------
Troll Rating: 175
April 6, 2008 2:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not sure the media is showing a bias toward Obama on this one. HRC's Bosnia "mis-remember" (a confabulation that, if unintended, does causes this reader to question Mrs. Clinton's ability to accurately recall details of her own history) inevitable gets the press curious about other potential misrepresentations and/or "unfacts" that Hillary may have used during her campaign. So, I don't really see this as bias. Is this false "if only she had good health care" story really, that meaningful? Not really. I think it does reinforce a perception among some that Hillary is dishonest and has a myopic tendencies modulated by the concerns of primary state voters.
What I wonder, what I really do wonder, is why I keep hearing that BO and Clinton are "neck and neck", "Toe to toe" in this "close race" that is "essentially tied". Even Hillary supporters acknowledge that her chances of actually earning the nomination are slim. Any thoughts?
April 6, 2008 1:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
scottSD, I think what people are talking about is the big picture view from the point of view of an un-decided strong Democrat super delegate who will be, in the end, deciding this because neither candidate can win without their votes.
if you think it is unfair, just remember if it were not for the super delegate plan we would have winner take all primaries and an insurgent like Obama would have no chance. Hillary would have won a long time ago with winner take all delegate allocation.
Hillary's case now is based on his failure, like so many of Axelrod's clients, to close the deal. So far he is not winning among traditional Democrats. he's doing well because of republicans and young people who are not reliable in a GE and because if independents who actually like McCain.
hillary is also attractive because she has made it clear Obama IS her short list- unless he falls flat. this brings the party back together quickly.
The luster is already off his star, we can't go into the way-back machine when he was perfect, and we have all seen a small tear in the fabric result in a spectacular downfall. There is plenty of time for Obama to take that fall. Given the generally graceful way in which he responded to the Rev. Wright controversy, this time will also give us an opportunity to increase our appreciation of him.
Obama's fate is also tied to the final outcome of the Rezko trial. Thank God Patrick Fitzgerald* is the prosecutor. The trial will be professionally prosecuted. they have been on recess but will resume soon. We all want Obama to emerge unscathed but there are questions about his involvement in the appointments process for Rezko's partner-in-crime and connections to Chicago party bosses who ain't so squeeky clean. Judicial Watch has scoured the Illinois state records and suggests that Obama's state records (appointment schedules and personal correspondence files appear to have been scrubbed according to the Hill). It's like Bush's national guard records. empty. why?
There have been whispers that Hillary told the Edwards that Obama has real Rezko problems and that is why John Edwards has withheld an endorsement of Obama even tho all his donors did. If Obama does not get entangled in Rezko's downfall I think he will be inoculated in the GE and not have to worry about Rezko. But trials bring surprises and we'll all wait and see. Read about it in the Chicago Sun Times and the Tribune.
* he brilliantly prosecuted Libby in the Plamegate case. Plame's husband, Joe Wilson, I submit, made the first real tear in fabric of the "permanent republican majority" myth, with his July 03 op ed in the NYTimes. Abramoff and attorneygate and the torture memo (read Phillipe Sands in the new Vanity Fair) destroyed the rest of the myth which is why McCain will not win in 2008.
Valarie Plame and Joe Wilson strongly support Hillary's campaign. you can read joe's stuff on huffpo his March 20 piece on the 3am phone call is great.
April 6, 2008 2:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
apologies for what should be my own post but scottsSD asked.
April 6, 2008 3:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for the substantive reply blusage. I do like the proportional democratic nominating process as I think "winner-take-all" primary contests fail to capture voter attitudes (this applies to the general election as well). Super-delegates will determine the result of this nomination process, I agree and think this will be good for Obama. How many SDs has Hillary added after the primaries began?
"Obama's fate is also tied to the final outcome of the Rezko trial."
-Really? If serious issues do arise regarding Obama's relationship with this guy, then the Rezko trial may have an impact, the magnitude of which we do not know. So, it is premature to align their fates with each other.
April 6, 2008 4:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
you are welcome
April 6, 2008 5:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
I love how all of you take the hospital's side -- despite their refusal to actually offer any proof and their obvious attempts to cover their own asses -- over Senator Clinton. I, for one, will withhold judgement.
April 6, 2008 1:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Clinton spokesman Mo Elleithee said the campaign verifies the anecdotes that they are told. 'In this case, we did try but were not able to fully vet it,' Elleithee said. 'If the hospital claims it did not happen that way, we respect that.'"
Looks like the Clinton people are taking the hospital's side now, too.
April 6, 2008 1:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Since when is the accused responsible for proving the case? In free societies, the burden of proof is on the accuser.
April 6, 2008 3:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Also on the ABC News last night, they showed the video of the policeman telling Hillary the story that she failed to check out properly. He seemed to be credible, so it kills any notion that Hillary was lying or making the story up. She simply failed to check it out. Mistake on her part, but not such a big deal.
Meanwhile ABC News also showed Obama denying that he himself filled out the questionnaire, saying that he had never seen it, and it was filled out by his aide. Then they showed the questionnaire in question, and showed Obama's handwriting on it.
I highly doubt that any Obama supporters are going to vote for Hillary because of Obama's "misstatement" about the questionnaire. So don't expect masses of Hillary supporters to switch sides over her failing to check out the policeman's story.
April 6, 2008 1:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, I guess she trusted the Deputy Sheriff but of course, the hospital is facing a law suit.
Drawing attention to health care and her foreign policy experience is her goal for talking about these issues.
Remember the issues but lets focus on he said, she said to stay divided.
Man, that unity is really something.
April 6, 2008 1:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
re: "Drawing attention to health care and her foreign policy experience is her goal for talking about these issues."
Ha! And therein her lies/mistatements/whatever betray her ignorance in these issues, or at least her compulsive need to puff up her resume regarding "expertise".
But then, you are a mccain supporter, so you know this already.
April 6, 2008 3:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here is where this story may point to a huge flaw in Hillary's claim that she is the one that is best equipped to take that 3.00am red phone call and take the proper action.
How about double checking that what you are hearing is actually true, before you run off and stir up the nation and perhaps rush to war, Hillary!
If she is so gullible that she just accepts everything that anyone tells her, then she sure as hell has not passed The Commander in Chief threshold that she requires others to do.
Keep in mind, Hillary is the one that claimed that George W. Bush fooled her into voting for the Iraq War. Her defense is: "I was duped by a dope". Looks like she may have to to recycle that excuse, and use it to explain her latest Fairy Tale.
April 6, 2008 2:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
gotalife - If you are going to willfully insist this has no bearing on anything - then quit talking about it.
If something like this doesn't matter, then what has been all the bullshit about a retired UCC minister? I mean come on - this is either indicative of something about the candidate and her people, or nothing is.
Which is it, gotalife? You keep spinning in two directions at once and you make me rather queasy.
April 6, 2008 2:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Trying to compare this non issue with his radical adviser is very desperate.
Get real.
April 6, 2008 2:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Seriously, though, "sweetheart" and "kitchen"?
And you claim to be a Democrat?
That's so unlikely, I'll bet even Troll Critic 3000 doesn't deign to score you. Didn't make it through the qualifying event.
April 6, 2008 2:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
As someone has undoubtedly pointed out, she didn't have to relate a second hand story, much less one that came back to bite her. God knows you can't swing a dead cat in this country without hitting a health care horror story. I'd venture to say she could have asked any one of her campaign aides to relate a story in personal terms about a friend or family member who has suffered at the hands of the Big Insurance racketeers to make a similar point.
April 6, 2008 2:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
People are calling this "Hillary's Song". Got to love that:
dlsxpatriate.blogspot.com
April 6, 2008 3:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Perception is real, truth is not." - Imelda Marcos [The New Yorker, April 20, 1998]
April 6, 2008 3:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Word up!
Where do campaigns find these people? It usually seems to be bullshit whenever they trot out some individual's story and I look around and wonder - why them? There are dozens, hundreds, thousands of people with totally credible stories.
I dunno - I just hate her campaign staff.
April 6, 2008 3:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
We know you hate the Clintons.
It is a mental illness on the blog.
The Clintons are leaders on your team.
Geez.
April 6, 2008 4:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Since when is logical thought a mental illness?
April 6, 2008 5:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Since George Orwell started making the rules.
April 6, 2008 6:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gotalife returns in a heartwearming tale of a doctor Pushed to the Edge only to learn that laughter just might be the best medicine after all. Eager to prove he's not just another Patch Adams, he delivers a fine prescription of Refuge in Scorn to bring the audience to life. If his endearing Bedside Manner doesn't win the acclaim of the TPM audience, his cherubic proto-hiaku delivery certainly will.
Known Troll: +5
Contrarian Troll Modifier: +3
Contrarian Monolithic Ref. Modifier: +2
Intellectual Dishonesty: +10
Willful Misinterpretation: +5
Strawman/FUD Modifier: +5
Seeking Refuge in Scorn: +25
Bitter Modifier: +15
Lab Diagnostics: +75
CoPay: +25
--------------------------------
Troll Rating: 170
April 6, 2008 6:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
O I do I do - thanks for the link.
April 6, 2008 3:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
I dunno - I just hate her campaign staff.
Posted by HusseinTenaX
Well Jake Tapper just took all of them out to the woodshed over claims that if you start counting from when Obama got to the Senate, then Hillary opposed the Iraq War before Obama:
Whatever her merits as a candidate (and my regard for her has been steadily declining), her propensity for trying to move any and every set of goalposts as they relate to her success in the primary just pisses me off. This habit of theirs makes her come off as so damn condescending, I don't know what to make of it.
April 6, 2008 4:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
It will be the next post here.
They both voted for it in the Senate.
Check their voting records on all Iraq votes since he came to the Senate.
They are all the same as Clinton.
They voted yes.
April 6, 2008 4:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
What a strawman you've constructed there. By the time Obama got to the Senate the troops were already in the field, so if you conflate funding them with sending them... well that'll help your troll rating next time Troll Critic comes through and updates your standings. Not sure that it'll help much more than that though.
April 6, 2008 5:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama has himself said he cannot say how he would have actually voted had he been in the senate so it is not moving the goal post.
It is not football it's politics.
April 6, 2008 4:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good point.
April 6, 2008 4:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well you don't seem to have read the post carefully or if you have you're not bothering to rebutt the argument on its merits:
And as to your statement that this is politics not football, then that means we should look at what the politicians did and said as well. Voting to fund troops that are already in the field is much different than voting to send them there in the first place. Try to envince a little more intellectual honesty than your candidate's campaign (though I admit that does put you in a difficult place).
April 6, 2008 4:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, I think you got it. Condescending is exactly right.
April 6, 2008 4:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Next up on the Hillary levels with the American People, tour;
Senator Hillary Rambo Clinton, The Heroine of Bosnia, will reveal that she has always favored Coca Cola over Pepsi, and vice-versa.
April 6, 2008 4:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
O here we go again - electability.
that's bullshit. The thing about Obama is that he will bring out all kinds of voters who don't vote that often if ever - progressives, tens of thousands of young voters, lots of voters in the South who gave up voting decades ago, PLUS the rest of us latte sipping white liberals who are so stricken with liberal guilt we're often told that's why we're voting for him.
No one on this planet knows who is more electable until someone wins the goddamn election. Otherwise it is speculation and generally subjective and always utter bullshit..
April 6, 2008 4:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Anyone who thinks Hillary's base is enough to elect her president is dreaming!
How do I know - the last two goddamn elections, that's how.
We either build a new coalition or we just get used to not winning.
It's just that simple.
April 6, 2008 4:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bill Clinton and Ross Perot, combined, beat Bush One, and Bob Dole. There is no evidence that Bill Clinton would have won in a straight up, one on one, contest.
Senator Obama is beating Hillary and Bill Clinton in the current contest. The two very famous Clintons, combined, are getting beaten by Senator Obama, so how the hell can anyone claim, with a straight face, that Hillary is the stronger candidate. Any of you that actually believe that Clinton Fairy Tale better enter a detox program now!
April 6, 2008 5:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm giving you a pass this one time, gotalife, but you listen to me - if there is one thing that makes me beyond furious, it is when someone puts words in my mouth.
If you don't know who Ry Cooder is, find out and get a copy of his song "That's the Way the Girls are from Texas" and pay close attention to the lyrics.
I said I hate her staff.
I have never said I hate either one of the Clintons. I have said I used to love Bill and respect her and they've managed to fuck that up themselves during this campaign.
this is the only warning you're going to get - Do not put words in my mouth.
April 6, 2008 5:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Mark Penn really is a creep, I like Maggie tho. I saw a NYT piece saying Hillary thinks good ideas come from a combative staff that argues a lot. like Lincoln's cabinet- they hated each other. sure beats bush's style, but it is rather rough and tumble.
April 6, 2008 5:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, Rendell wants him fired and he has a point but there is a loyalty issue.
It is great they argue and have different points of view. Then she makes the decision based on the best argument.
w just takes the easy way out and fights for the corportists and not the people.
All his cabinet agrees and just ignores the people.
Of course this makes him the worst President ever.
April 6, 2008 5:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oooh, touched a nerve.
What are going to do, cuss me out in bold letters?
Here is a clue, hate breeds hate.
When you spew you hate people of your own party, I will call you on it.
So tone down your hate, so I will not have to call you on your hate.
That goes for all you Obama trolls.
Got it?
April 6, 2008 5:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
"We know you hate the Clintons."
I don't hate them. I fear them.
April 6, 2008 5:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why, we know how they govern.
Was it the peace or prosperity?
April 6, 2008 5:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't know or care whether you hate the Clintons or not. And I don't care if you choose to hide behind this ridiculous fig leaf, i.e. that it is not the Clintons you hate, it is their staff. Hee
I can tell you you sure as hell sound like you hate the Clintons to the core of your very essence. So I have no idea why you're taking such offense. You clearly have assumed the role of an absolute and unmitigated divider in this campaign as far as I can see. And it doesn't matter if you write "fuck" and type in bold letters. You are like so many other dividers so far as I can tell, fundamental dividers of the Democratic Party, who purport to be doing so in the interest of uniting the party behind Senator Obama. To me, you just sound like yet another poster at the TPM Cafe who lives to trash Hillary Clinton and/or people like me who are her loyal and committed and proud supporters.
So why is it that you support Senator Obama anyway? Because you want to unite this country? You can't even behave in a blog thread.
Hate away. Stew in it. Fester in it. And you may have the last word and then some.
April 6, 2008 6:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hmm... people. People. It's a nice day out. Here in Michigan, a nice spring day. I rode my bike, did yard work, read a book under the sun while smoking a cigar.
It's too nice to hate.
But I still can't get beyond the disappointment I feel watching Clinton's campaign. It's a sort of preemptive disappointment.
How she's flubbed things. The dishonesty of her campaign. How, if she does beat the odds and get the nomination, she will be hit relentlessly by the Republicans for her dishonesty. They made stuff up for Gore and Kerry. But with Clinton they have actual footage of her saying one thing, the camera proving otherwise.
This disappointment I feel stems from the Gore and Kerry runs. How the stale, safe campaigns guided by the usual Democrat posse couldn't beat the vile clowns who've run the White House.
I had friends' homes ruined, and thought one might have died, in that first week of Katrina. Remember seeing people on rooftops, Bush patting Brownie on the back. You want hate? You want to hear someone say some harsh words?
Now we got the Maverick who's going to keep the Bush status quo going. My feelings about Clinton right now equal my feelings about Kerry when he did that "Reporting for duty" sketch at the convention. We know you were in Vietnam, sir, but the shtick is lame if you can't communicate to the people how you're the best choice, how you're going to fix Bush's mess.
Clinton's coming off as a fake, a phony. If she campaigns for the general as she has for the nomination, she's a loser.
April 6, 2008 7:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gotalife delivers a powerhouse performance full of the False Equivalency Rage he's best known for in this latest action-packed twist on the venerable Enfant Provocateur genre. An ongoing reprisal, Gotalife nevertheless manages to push a worn character into brave new territory with a spectacular Tantrum in a Teapot sequence that will leave the TPM audience hanging on the edge of their seats yet again.
Known Troll: +5
Contrarian Troll Modifier: +3
Contrarian Monolithic Ref. Modifier: +2
Intellectual Dishonesty: +10
Willful Misinterpretation: +5
Strawman/FUD Modifier: +5
Seeking Refuge in Scorn: +25
Enfant Provocateur Modifier: +35 (A Personal Best!)
Innocence Abused Modifier: +15
No, YOU'RE a Troll Modifier: +25
Bitter Modifier: +15
Tantrum Modifier: +45
-----------------------------------
Troll Rating: 190
April 6, 2008 7:09 PM | Reply | Permalink