Hillary Telling Local Media In Future Voting States That Obama Wants Race To End
Hillary appears to have adopted a concerted strategy of telling local media in states that will vote after Pennsylvania that Obama and his supporters are opposed to allowing those states' residents to vote.
Here's Hillary making that case in an interview with a local TV station in North Carolina...
Hillary made similar comments to a Montana station, too, and to one in Indiana. These comments appear to be targeted towards local media; she hasn't to my knowledge gone this far in her speeches or in her comments to the national political press.
While it's true that Obama surrogates have called for her to drop out, the farthest that any Obama campaign official has gone is to say that Hillary almost certainly can't win the contest and that there should be a "sober" evaluation of her chances. And Obama himself has explicitly said she has a right to continue campaigning.
That Hillary is now pushing this line suggests that her advisers believe Obama surrogates erred in giving her an opening to galvanize her supporters and play the feisty underdog -- something the Obama campaign may recognize, too, judging by its efforts to rapidly dial back the calls for her to leave the race.















Ahem. Senator, do you have any idea how sick Americans get of campaign season? I'm willing to bet at least half the people who see your ad say right back at the TV: "I wish to hell it was over too!"
Regardless of who they are voting for.
April 1, 2008 11:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Intrade Market:
Obama: 82.8 (up 2.4)
Hillary: 15.3 (down 2.0)
Looks like even investors are getting tired!
♪♪♪
April 1, 2008 12:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let's be clear about this. Those people who questioned whether Hillary should stay in didn't err at all. The more Clinton has to answer questions about her election viability, the more off message she becomes.
She's already tossed any pretense to running a pro-Hillary campaign in throwing the kitchen sink. That hurt her as much if not more than him, and now she's having to justify on a daily basis her reasons for remaining in the race. She can play the victim role again, but it's a role with rapidly diminishing returns.
This is a huge distraction for Team Clinton.
April 1, 2008 1:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
What!. The Heroine of Tuzla lying again. What a shocker.
Hillary is now campaigning for George W. Bush's third term.
April 1, 2008 11:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think, maybe, you mean the "Tigress of Tuzla"... someone else on here called it, and I thought it had a nice ring to it... maybe a concerted effort can make it stick? (like the redefinition of Santorum from Dan Savage)
April 1, 2008 1:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let's be clear: she's not just saying that Obama's supporters want to "prevent them from being able to vote", she's saying that Obama himself is wanting this.
I.e., she's lying.
April 1, 2008 11:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Here's David Plouffe on February 13th saying "she can't catch us".
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0208/Plouffe_She_cant_catch_us.html
As his surrogates have gone out and said she should drop out, Obama also said the race is like a movie that's gone on a half an hour too long. If Hillary's surrogates said something like that and she echoed the sentiments, what do you think you'd be saying? That it was an orchestrated push.
April 1, 2008 11:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary, in late Dec.: this thing will be over by Feb. 5.
Talking about not wanting people to vote!!
April 1, 2008 11:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Show us the math by which she catches the Obama campaign in pledged delegates. And not using Clintonian math. DNC sanctioned contest. Ok, go.
April 1, 2008 11:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Show us the math in which Obama secures the 2,024 delegates needed for the nomination in pledged delegates. And not using Obamanian math. DNC sanctioned contest. Ok, go.
April 1, 2008 1:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
De = the delegates he has earned so far
Dl = the delegates he is likely to earn in upcoming contests
Sa = the supers who are already commited to him
Sf = the supers who believe that they should confirm the vote of the pledged delegates
So = the supers who think that they should use their best judgement and vote for the candidate who is best and think that Obama is best
De + Dl + Sa + Sf + So >= 2024
April 1, 2008 1:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
I just threw up in my mouth a little. Thanks.
April 1, 2008 4:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
This of course being a response to Another_Reader, not Larry.
What the hell with this commenting technology being so goofy?
April 1, 2008 5:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama also said the race is like a movie that's gone on a half an hour too long.
pants aflame. he didn't say that, he repudiated other people saying it. but carry on in your little fantasy world.
April 1, 2008 11:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama has gone out of his way (repeatedly) to say she can stay in as long as she wants. He's never called for her to step down. He's never tried to stop any of these states from voting.
April 1, 2008 12:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just those votes from counting...
April 1, 2008 12:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let's be fair, Ben. Hillary is tarred with just about every underhanded and conniving statement out of her campaign. You see that constantly in these pages. Why should it not work both way? Why do you defend Obama from his surrogates' inappropriate or misleading comments, yet implicate Hillary in the very same mischief?
April 1, 2008 1:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ben does not do that.
April 1, 2008 2:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
I hate ignorant people. What she actually said is "My take on it is a lot of Sen. Obama's supporters want to end this race because they don't want people to keep voting," she told KTVQ in Billings, Montana. "That's just the opposite of what I believe. We want people to vote. I want the people of Montana to vote, don't you?"
What is untrue about that? Richardson, Leahy, Dodd, read the boards all over. They are all openly pressuring Hillary to leave the race.
Where did she accuse Senator Obama of advocating this himself? Correct the record or find some facts to back up your nonsense.
April 1, 2008 6:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't want to call you out for not being able to read, but when the headline answers your question, it leaves your intelligence open to question.
Granted, SHE can't control the headline, but that may be what people are reacting to. Can't be certain, but it stands to reason.
April 1, 2008 8:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
And there in a nutshell is the Obamabots problem. You get as far as the headline and then start spouting nonsense drivel, rather than listening to the actual quote of what she said. OBAMA supporters have been calling on her to drop out. Is that seriously in question? Dodd, Richardson, Leahy, pretty much every Obama supporter in this thread.
You call my intelligence into question for quoting what she actually said while you are citing a headline. Just like an Obama supporter - all about the image and surface (headline) and unwilling to get to real issues (what was actually said).
before you go questioning someone else's intelligence, you should probably ensure that facts are on your side.
April 1, 2008 10:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://img174.imageshack.us/img174/7360/cm20capture201mr4.jpg
Honesty!
April 1, 2008 11:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Every time I think she has finally hit rock bottom, she gets out the jackhammer and goes even lower.
April 1, 2008 11:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, fortunately, no voting is going to take place for three weeks, so the Obama campaign has plenty of time to rebut these claims. It's good in a way that the Clintons are doing this now, rather than two weeks from now.
They're like Timex watches: takes a licking and keeps on ticking....
April 1, 2008 11:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
She apparently thinks that lying and whining about unfair treatment is how you win elections.
She really is the most uninspiring candidate I've ever seen (and that includes Walter Mondale and Michael Dukakis). I hope that the fact that she will mobilize 0 people who don't already support her is factoring into the superdelegates' decision on whom to support at the convention.
April 1, 2008 11:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
So she's lying again as usual.
April 1, 2008 11:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
How could anyone say that Obama wants the race to end? How could anyone believe such a thing? Obviously he wants the race to continue as long as it possibly can so that everyone has a chance to be represented, even if that means his narrow lead over Clinton might diminish and open the possibility of superdelegates siding with Hillary. That's because Mr. Obama is not a politician. He's not in this to win. He's in it for to fight for what is right. He believes only in fair play and goodness and hope for all. He will continue to urge Mrs. Clinton to fight on, because he is a totally fair and selfless man. And then there will be world peace and prosperity for all, and the birds will sing, and the lion will lie down with the lamb....
April 1, 2008 11:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
And you, Otto F, are a cynical fool!
April 1, 2008 12:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Boring.
April 1, 2008 12:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well said, and very accurate.
:-)
Except for your additional silliness at the end, I'd agree with your statement. He IS a different kind of politician.
April 1, 2008 3:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
If they believe Obama supporters went too far and it's a great point for her why doesn't she push it in the national press? Oh that's right because it just begets more discussion of the fact that there's no way she can possibly win. Clinton is being cute by trying to raise this, but she knows that extended discussion of her viability in this race is a bad issue for her. She might get some gain whining about the calls for her to quit, but in the end the whole topic just highlights that her campaign is a lost cause.
April 1, 2008 11:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wow. I'm the meat in a troll sandwich.
April 1, 2008 11:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
She did, actually. Lying Howard Wolfson got about 10 minutes from Andrea Mitchell on MSNBC yesterday, spreading these exact lies: that Obama doesn't want these people to vote.
She didn't question him once. She didn't even bring up Obama saying she should stay in the race.
Of course, her husband is going to get a new job from Hillary. How's that for journalistic integrity.
April 1, 2008 11:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Andrea did that with Bosnia gate too. How do MSM viewers still put up with her ?
April 1, 2008 11:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
And let's not forget that Andrea Mitchell was actually on the plane (and tarmac) with Hillary in Tuzla, but kept completely silent amid Hillary's claims that she (and Mitchell) were under sniper fire at the time.
Stay classy, Andrea Mitchell.
April 1, 2008 1:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
And:
"House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said the superdelegates who may ultimately decide the Democratic party's presidential nominee have a right to vote as they wish."
Obama made a huge mistake and she is making him pay for it.
Deal with it trolls.
April 1, 2008 11:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
You understand, of course, that this means that the Super-Delegates can vote their conscience for Obama too, right?
Like they have 50 - 2 for him since Feb 5...
April 1, 2008 11:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
Very Rovian of you: Obama supporters are automatically "trolls".
Also, "voting one's conscience" is not synonymous with voting for Clinton. Most people's conscience thus far has led them to a different decision, as I suspect will occur with the "uncommitted" super-delegates as well.
April 1, 2008 11:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
the majority of commenters being "trolls" makes as much sense as "hillary can still win this." (btw, i miss gotnolife's scalia-fliping-the-italian-bird icon -- much more telling from a hillary supporter.)
April 1, 2008 11:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Troll?
April 1, 2008 12:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
apparently, somebody doesn't know what a "troll" is.
April 1, 2008 1:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
He knows what one is. He is just lashing out at every one because he was called on being a troll. It is like the A**hole rule - 'If some one claims that everyone in a group is an A**hole, it is a safe bet that they are the only A**hole in the group.'
April 1, 2008 2:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Goatlife, is everybody who doesn't support your candidate a troll? Do we have to move to the states that "don't count," too?
April 1, 2008 1:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
She lied.
Obama has not said that she should drop out. He said over the weekend that she should campaign as long as she wants, she's on the ballot.
Some of his surrogates suggested that she bow out, but then again, so did one prominent Senator that supports her suggesting "she go to the door, or be shown the door".
What will be interesting will be which gains more traction:
Her rallying of troops based on suggestions that she drop out..
OR
The constant drumbeat of when asking and calculating when she's going to drop out.
Either way, we're talking about her dropping out.
Her campaign's been shot by the "Loser-tag", now it's just a matter of waiting until her campaign finally drops...
April 1, 2008 11:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Couldn't it also "suggest" that they're a desperate campaign that's willing to say anything to buy themselves more time?
April 1, 2008 11:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
she's telling another bold faced LIE!!! Another example of how she will "say and do anything" to steal this election, because she certainly can't win it.
April 1, 2008 11:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
And this will sway undecided voters how?
Calling attention to the fact that many prominent Democrats want her to concede in an effort to unite the party and win in November helps her how?
Reminding people that she is far behind in the pledged delegate count helps her how?
Lying about what Obama has publicly said helps her how?
Having no money and losing superdelegate support helps her how?
Remember that Huckabee railed against the Republican power brokers who asked him to leave the race, as well. And I don't remember more people voting for him because of it.
April 1, 2008 11:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
hillary the liar strikes again
April 1, 2008 11:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama needs to denounce AND reject this assertion on Clintons part. He further needs to state that he not only wants all votes in all states to count. But that he has had a 50 state strategy from the beginning and that he has not cherry picked states to campaign in. That he planned from the start to go all the way to the convention and he is glad to see that Hillary Clinton has now decided to join him in this 50 state campaign unlike her statement in Dec 07 that the race would be over on Super Tuesday as she told Stephanopoulous.
April 1, 2008 11:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
She's a vile person. I posted about this tack on my blog last night. This isn't just politics, this is slimy yuckiness. The only thing I see while watching this is a desperate liar. Only a true believer would actually believe the words the she's saying.
April 1, 2008 11:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ahhhh, you can smell the desperation.
When the polls are tightening and the lies are exposed, what do Clintons do?
Lie some more, what else could we expect?
April 1, 2008 11:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Also, this is hilarious.
April 1, 2008 11:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Go Tarheels!
Whatta stupid analogy. That alone should have made the reporters skeptical...
April 1, 2008 12:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Does this mean every primary that hasn't lasted until the convention has been an act of mass disenfranchisement?
April 1, 2008 11:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
But ending it on February 5th would have been o.k., right???
April 1, 2008 11:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
another day, another straw to grasp.
April 1, 2008 11:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Weak.
April 1, 2008 11:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
You know, I heard Bill make a similar statement in Kentucky a week ago. This seems like the dumbest straw man argument yet. No one is trying to shut down voting, whether she is an active candidate or not.
And I don't think this makes her look like the "feisty underdog," it makes her look sad, desperate and dishonest. All it will take is a quick Youtube video of Hillary and Bill making these statements interspersed with clips of Obama, Pelosi and others saying she should continue campaigning.
April 1, 2008 11:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
but then,
since Obama hasn't actually said that
doesn't that make Clinton even more of a liar?
Why yes it does.
April 1, 2008 11:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
but then,
since Obama hasn't actually said that
doesn't that make Clinton even more of a liar?
Why yes it does.
April 1, 2008 11:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hasn't Obama already been running some ads and/or doing some campaigning in Indiana and North Carolina? That communicates more to the people of these states that Obama wants to hear their voices than anything Hillary says about what he wants.
April 1, 2008 11:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
and strabo's link deserves to be reposted.
http://img174.imageshack.us/img174/7360/cm20capture201mr4.jpg
April 1, 2008 11:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
She usually doesn't get caught (nationally) when she lies like this locally. I remember reading a quote from her in Ohio: "Obama doesn't want you to have healthcare. He only wants children to have healthcare."
These kinds of distortions are typical of her. Is the campaign striking back? They need to not let these perceptions sink in.
In Ohio, people who went to her campaign events actually thought they'd be getting "free" healthcare from Hillary but have to pay for it with Obama. A distortion she fomented.
April 1, 2008 11:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Obama had greater role on liberal survey";
"During his first run for elected office, Barack Obama played a greater role than his aides now acknowledge in crafting liberal stands on gun control, the death penalty and abortion — positions that appear at odds with the more moderate image he has projected during his presidential campaign.
The evidence comes from an amended version of an Illinois voter group’s detailed questionnaire, filed under his name during his 1996 bid for a state Senate seat."
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0308/9269.html
Told you he is a fraud trolls.
April 1, 2008 11:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
EGADS!!!!
A Democratic candidate has progressive views.
Do the Republicans know about this?!?!
Since we're throwing the fraud label around, since you support Hillary you obviously MUST believe that she did run from sniper-fire in Bosnia, right?
Otherwise, wouldn't you be supporting a fraud?
April 1, 2008 12:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
U funny troll!
April 1, 2008 12:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
What are 'fraud trolls?'
Are they real trolls, or faux trolls? Or are they trolls who valiantly look for fraud?
April 1, 2008 12:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Are they real trolls, or faux trolls? Or are they trolls who valiantly look for fraud?
Ah, that's great. I'm still laughing about it.
April 1, 2008 4:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
If you do indeed have a life you need to GET OFF YOUR ASS and go raise some campaign cash for your candidate.
All you're doing here is making her look worse.
April 1, 2008 12:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Troll??
I fart in your general direction!
April 1, 2008 12:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Stop hacking my avatar troll.
April 1, 2008 12:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Goatlife, what's an "avatar troll" and how does one hack it? I think you left out a comma (which makes me a Grammar Troll! Oh Noes!).
April 1, 2008 1:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hacking your avatar keeps my blood pressure nice and low.
Sorry, Troll!
April 1, 2008 1:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Or how about going back to some of Obama's releases where he is trying to remind people that despite Clinton's desire to focus on Pennsylvania, that he was interested in getting the focus on ALL of the remaining contests???? Media bias my @$$.
http://thepage.time.com/memo-from-obama-campaign-
manager-plouffe-2/
April 1, 2008 11:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Or how her campaign has written off voters in caucuses or red states or "boutique states" because they supported Obama.
April 1, 2008 11:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
In Clintonian I believe this is called misspeaking.
April 1, 2008 11:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Will any undecided voter fall for this? It seems you would have to already be pretty anti-Obama to actually believe he doesn't want everyone to vote (note she actually says he wants to "prevent" them voting, as if he doesn't want there to be an election at all). Even Clinton supporters (TPM trolls notwithstanding) aren't anti-Obama for the most part, so if anything this may peel off some of her soft support. Repeatedly saying he doesn't want "you" to vote sounds obviously pandering as well, so that may be a turnoff as well. The campaign really is completely tone-deaf -- sometimes doing whatever it takes to win doesn't actually help you win, it just makes people think you will do whatever it takes to win.
April 1, 2008 11:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Also, "voting one's conscience" is not synonymous with voting for Clinton. Most people's conscience thus far has led them to a different decision, as I suspect will occur with the "uncommitted" super-delegates as well.
O bravo for that. All these Clinton trolls constantly hammering on the independence of the SDs as if it's a foregone conclusion they will vote for her. And then of course, there are all of those who purport to think for the SDs, and it's always that they secretly are going to agree he's too black to be elected.
Can I have some mind-reading pills, too, please?
April 1, 2008 11:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh man, how much I hate the lying monsters!!!
April 1, 2008 11:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
I said to a conservative colleage at work the other day: "Friend, we should cherish this moment. When else will we both be able to say that we hate Hillary Clinton equally?"
April 1, 2008 11:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Link got messed up. Here.
http://thepage.time.com/memo-from-obama-campaign-manager-plouffe-2/
April 1, 2008 11:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary is playing April's first fools day
April 1, 2008 11:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
The voter might ask - why is she making such a big thing about continuing her campaign?
Has she lost?
April 1, 2008 11:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
The inevitability of Death by Inevitability
April 1, 2008 11:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
At some point, Obama trolls will admit he is a lying fraud:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0308/9269.html
The gop will do it for you trolls.
April 1, 2008 11:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
[cough] Bosnia, Ireland, NAFTA, FMLA, "we all know Michigan's vote won't count" [cough]
Oh... I'm sorry, were you saying something?
April 1, 2008 12:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
When pigs fly and hell freezes over, fella.
April 1, 2008 12:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
"The gop will do it for you trolls."
Conceding so soon? Awww, and here we were ready to take this to the convention floor. Might wanna mind that chink in your armor there, friend.
April 1, 2008 8:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
"The Torture Never Stops"......Zappa
April 1, 2008 11:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Clinton is a "vile," "lying," "desperate," "slimy," "dishonest" "monster"? Might I remind you that we are speaking of a fellow democrat here. I am just as eager to see Obama win as any of my Obama-supporter fellows here, but I would submit to you that this sort of talk is not helpful. We have as much as won folks. Now is the time to be gracious in victory. Clinton's supporters on this board cannot give her a victory in the primaries (and even if they could, we could not stop them with epithets) but they can still abandon the party and cede a victory to McCain (who is the real enemy in this election). We need to be working to reconcile them to our candidate, not alienating them further by gratuitous disparagements of a candidate whom they love and admire.
That said, I do have to question the effectiveness of the approach that Sen Clinton is taking here. I daresay that if the voters of PA, NC, OR, KY, WV, SD & MT were really critically concerned about having a say, they would have urged their states to move up to Feb 5. I am not arguing that they ought not to have their say. I am simply pointing out that it is hard to believe that they are really particular exercised by the idea of voting in a non-competitive race. I suppose that we will see how this works, but I am not especially worried at this point.
April 1, 2008 12:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
spot on, greg.
April 1, 2008 12:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Greg, thanks for the voice of reason. I'm sure I've said some things that upset Clinton supporters, but you're right. Obama has as much as won. We should be gracious, and make the Clinton supporters welcome in the Democratic big tent.
So -- good game, all! Come on over and join the party! Have some Koolaid ;)
April 1, 2008 4:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's about the dumbest thing I've ever heard. MI & FL were punished for moving their primaries up, so they have to appeal to the Credentials Cmmittee to be seated. Now you are saying that the remaining states should be disenfranchised because they left their primaries on the dates they were originally set for - simply because obama supporters want the race over now. Insert the sound of one clap slowly buidling to a crescendo-->Congratulations - you have made the most illogical argument ever on TPM.
April 1, 2008 10:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Brilliant use of language, even in a nakedly evil way.
By saying Obama wants to "prevent" people from voting, she's conjuring up images of armed guards blocking the polls.
And let's be clear: it's a lie not because he never said he wanted her out of the race, but it's a lie because nobody but nobody, including Leahy, who went the farthest of anyone, has said that these primaries should be cancelled.
One of you Clinton trolls out there go ahead and show me one single person saying that NC and WV and KY et al should cancel their primaries, and then you've got something. What people are saying is that those votes should continue without her actively campaigning in them, because she no longer has a reasonable chance to win. It's like a basketball game where one team is up by 20 with 2 minutes left. You stop the full court press, you stop fouling intentionally, and you put your reserves in. That doesn't mean the last two minutes of the game don't happen.
I wonder if she truly doesn't understand that these votes would go on without her because she doesn't understand that things exist outside her own self-interest?
April 1, 2008 12:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Holy punchcards! Obama is once agian using his super election-stopping power! The fiend!
Little is known about this power, but many believe he acquired it after cutting himself on a sharp corner of a radioactive voting booth during the Illinois primary. Since that time, by use of this dark and mysterious power, he has prevented the Florida and Michigan Democratic parties from submitting valid delegate selection plans to the DNC and has even stopped the Michigan and Florida legislatures from passing laws!
Now, encouraged by these successes, this evil mastermind is turning the full force of this super power onto the remaining primaries! Polling places will mysteriously vanish! Laws will disappear from the statute books! Little old ladies who've served as precinct captains for decades will suddenly develop an overpowering urge to blow the whole thing off and hit the bingo parlor!
Who, oh who, will save us from this supernatural wave of disenfranchisement?
April 1, 2008 12:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think this is approximately the right response. Is there anyone who doesn't realize that by this logic, almost everyone in the nation has been prevented from voting in a presidential primary in the last two decades?
I think I can confidently say that this is the first presidential primary since 1980 where I was not prevented from voting. But as luck would have it, I live in a state where, even though I was not prevented from voting, my vote doesn't count because I drink lattes and went to college. I can stop with the coffee but unwinding my brain might take more effort.
All voters are equal but some are a lot more equal than others . . .
April 1, 2008 1:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Only the Heroine of Tuzla can save us now.
April 1, 2008 1:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
i think this "people want me to drop out" angle will be the thing that excites the american electorate and turbocharges her campaign. yes, that's it. how exciting it must be to be part of the upstart underdog outsider hillary campaign!
April 1, 2008 12:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
She is a lying piece of cow poo.
April 1, 2008 12:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
It has all come clear to me, now. The new scenario is as follows; Obama will be found guilty of (fill in the blank). Then Shrillary will save the nation. I always feel so much better after I have my meds.
What! It could happen! Or she just becomes McCain's Veep.
April 1, 2008 12:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why is anyone surprised is beyond me,as per David Geffen the Clintons lie with ease unforseen before.
Another lie is that the Dems have 2 outstanding candidates.HClinton is not an outstanding candidates.She is a liar.
April 1, 2008 12:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
A question for someone who might actually know the rules.
Is there in the DNC nomination process rules language that essentially says that every State (and territories i.e. Puerto Rico) MUST be included in the process?
Is there a link for the "rules"?
April 1, 2008 12:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Google "2008 Democratic Call to Convention"
But I'm not seeing the point of looking. Her statement is utterly ridiculous. No one is stopping any elections. The elections will happen whether she's in the race or not. People like us will show up to vote regardless of whether she's in the race.
April 1, 2008 12:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, duh! All states and territories send something called "delegates" to something called a "convention." Voters in states that fall later in the primary calendar can vote for the candidate of their choosing. Case in point: More than a month after he had quit the race, Edwards received 38,000 votes in Ohio.
But the Dem primaries in years past were usually sewn up long before April because of the math, which is why Obama supporters — and I'm one — keep coming back to the mathematical improbability that Clinton can emerge as the nominee. The math presumes that the future contests will more or less resemble past contests. If Clinton were to win the remaining contests 90-10%, then Obama would be severely damaged goods. But the more he looks like he is the eventual nominee, the greater the likelihood is that he will do well in later contests.
A long way of saying: Later contests do and don't matter. They allocate delegates, but the likelihood that the allocation will change the trend lines dramatically is slim to non-existent.
April 1, 2008 1:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
All states have their primaries, regardless of whether or not the results will impact the current race. Also, there are almost always other more local issues and races on the same ballots. The significance of a primary while no winner is yet decided lies in the size of turnout. This of course can greatly affect local items in ways their opponents/proponents can rarely predict.
April 1, 2008 1:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Trolls think Obama did not know what Dodd, Leahy, Richardson and Pelosi were trying to do is ridiculous.
It was a hige mistake and he should pay for it.
Stop giving him a free pass trolls.
April 1, 2008 12:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
You forgot to say, "Obama is very tricksy! The Precious will be Mine! MY PRECIOUS!"
April 1, 2008 1:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
"free pass trolls"
U funny again!
April 1, 2008 1:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
I will follow you!!
Troll!
April 1, 2008 2:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is it Shrillary or Holler-y?
April 1, 2008 12:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
She's lying to the local media, the folks who are starstruck enough to not ask followup questions such as "did Obama really say this?"
I admit I was one, a newbie in news radio, 1996,starstruck at interviewing a real senator, John McCain! Gasp! He shook my hand and everything! Golly, senator, whatcha doin' in our town? Supporting Bob Dole? Awesome!
April 1, 2008 12:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama had greater role on liberal survey";
"During his first run for elected office, Barack Obama played a greater role than his aides now acknowledge in crafting liberal stands on gun control, the death penalty and abortion — positions that appear at odds with the more moderate image he has projected during his presidential campaign.
Well thank god, because those are just the kinds of progressive positions I've been hoping for from a Democrat.
It's so very interesting how every time we get close to being in power in the party, something happens to push us out of the way again. We had to go from Dean to Kerry - why? Because Kerry was supposedly more electable. Yeah that worked.
Americans actually like progressive ideas, as long as you don't couch them in objectionable terms like: "do you agree with the socialists and communists that healthcare should be available for everyone?"
Dude.
April 1, 2008 12:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why did he lie about it then?
Read the article before you spew or play the race card again.
You can give gim a free pass on all his lies but the gop will not.
He will lose in a landslide.
Wake up and stop giving him a free pass.
Clinton admits her mistakes.
When will Obama?
In the general?
Lets get real trolls.
April 1, 2008 12:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Clinton admits her mistakes."
HA!
April 1, 2008 12:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bosnia.
Google Obama lies.
April 1, 2008 12:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
She said she misspoke. "Misspoke" at least 4 times. "Misspoke" from prepared text.
That'd not admitting anything.
An admission sounds like, "I blatantly lied about my trip to Bosnia."
April 1, 2008 1:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're hilarious!
Where's the race card, in Tena's response?
Gotalife: oxymoronic.
April 1, 2008 12:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Click on her name. She has played the race card like Obama.
April 1, 2008 1:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry.
Your name is still oxymoronic.
And your posts are just sad.
April 1, 2008 1:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
You never respond to any posts, so I'm sure I'm wasting my time, but on the odd chance you'll actually read this:
Why are you doing this? Your vitriol is not swaying anyone to Hillary's side.
I can only conclude you are a McCain supporter, trying to sabotage Democratic chances.
April 1, 2008 12:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
No troll.
I post the facts and his lies.
Why do you give him a free pass on all his lies?
April 1, 2008 1:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
I've read the article(s). And what they all come down to is everybody agrees that his campaign manager is the one who filled out the questionnaire, and that this was during his first campaign, and that in the dozen years between then and now, he's learned to answer these questions with more nuance. And that this is one of the biggest non-issues of the campaign.
The Clintonites are really getting desperate with this. You're better off attacking his bowling skills.
April 1, 2008 1:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
but of course, not as skillfully nuanced as the word 'is'.
April 1, 2008 1:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, it all depends on what your definition of "is" is.
I'll make this one post just for fun, then I'm on to DailyKos and DP.
She has never said voting for the Iraq War was a mistake nor apologized for it.
She has never said that she was WRONG when she said she underwent sniper fire, etc., in Bosnia.
I don't remember ever hearing her apologize for anything, even relatively small things.
That is because she lies so easily. Obama may nuance; but she doesn't even seem to understand that her lies are NOT the truth.
OTOH, I was undergoing sniper fire while posting this; and it is very uncomfortable having to wear AND sit on a flack jacket.
April 1, 2008 4:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
"get real trolls"
Have we been buying fake ones all this time?
April 1, 2008 1:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
The thing about credibility is, it doesn't come back. I think events over the past few weeks have added up, and people will begin to view her statements more and more in the way many of us view Bush's statements: Political posturing and gamesmenship with usually little to no evidence or reality to back it up. The Bosnia story, on face value didn't mean much, but when that is the framework before you push a bunch of other exagerated or made up stories, the push no longer works. The more she talks, the more credibility she loses.
The irony is that without a chance to win, she may be hurting Obama a little with these attacks, but she is hurting herself much more. Her future in the democratic party is all but destroyed. It is going to take a seriously good concession speech and some phenominal backtracking for alot of people to give her another shot. Hey, at least she has HOPE to hang onto.
April 1, 2008 12:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's some news from Mississippi; Obama picks one delegate and Hillary loses one:
April 1, 2008 12:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Didn't Hillary try to, and expected to, win it all on Super Tuesday. Why was she trying to ended it much earlier than she is now falsely claiming Senator Obama wants to end it.
Why did Hillary Rambo Clinton, The Heroine of Tuzla, want to deprive all the States that voted after Super Tuesday of their right to have a say in who would be the nominee. If Hillary had her way on Super Tuesday, then she would not have allowed Texas, Ohio, and Pennsylvania any meaningful input on who the nominee of the party would be.
The only reason that she is now standing up for the remaining states is because her megalomaniacal goal to wrap it up on Super Tuesday did not happen.
April 1, 2008 12:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
The only reason that she is now standing up for the remaining states is because her megalomaniacal goal to wrap it up on Super Tuesday did not happen.
ding ding ding! you win the occam's razor award.
April 1, 2008 12:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Greg,I'm an Independent, so the only adjective I feel is unfair in your list is "slimy". Unfortunately, all of the others listed are fully applicable. Worse yet, Hillary earned every one of them. She's the one who needs to play nice, but every day she gives us another reason to loathe her. I would take issue with "dishonest", as she's clearly deserving of "liar". Incoming!...
April 1, 2008 12:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Letting Barry HUSSEIN Osama take the lead was all part of my master plan:
1. Let Barry HUSSEIN Osama take the lead.
2. Do whatever it takes to win.
3. Win!
So far, I've nailed #1. Which means, ipso facto ergo sum, that #2 is just around the corner. And then #3 will be right behind. Count on it! Prepare the confetti cannon!
April 1, 2008 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's not like she's not used to lying on camera.
April 1, 2008 12:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
May be Clinton should act all butt-hurt and cry again so people will vote for her . . . When she's running as McCain's VP.
Still scared of Americans.
April 1, 2008 12:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Strawman.
Yawn.
April 1, 2008 12:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Would some reporter please call the Clintons on their hypocrisy. It takes alot of balls for the campaign that told students in Iowa that they shouldn't participate, that sued in Nevada to block shift workers from participating, that challenged entire precincts in texas to disqualify voters that it is not they but Senator Obama that wants to block people from voting. When will someone ask her about this?
And that doesn't even include Florida and Michigan. If their voices were so important why was the Senator herself telling them they don't count? Why did her own senior advisor Ickes actually cast a vote that stripped those states of their delegations? Why did her own campaign chairman Mcauliffe advocate a similar punishment for Michigan in 2004 when he was DNC chairman? How does she square these facts with her assertion now that it really is all Senator Obama's fault?
April 1, 2008 12:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
President Hillary Rodham Clinton, you funny!
LOL!!!
April 1, 2008 12:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
THE MAGIC NUMBER
Here’s what we have after considering the information in the Polls section below:
Senator Obama’s Magic Number – 88 of 310 remaining superdelegates needed, or 28.4%
Senator Clinton’s Magic Number – 241 of 310 remaining superdelegates needed, or 77.7%
The Huckabee Index – 69 or 22.3% of remaining superdelegates needed
The “Huckabee Index” is the number of any combination of superdelegates and convention/caucus delegates that the Obama campaign needs (or the Clinton campaign loses) to make it mathematically impossible for the Clinton campaign to win the nomination, based on current delegate count and polls for upcoming contests. (Disclaimer: This is meant to poke fun at Mike Huckabee, not Hillary Clinton)
Everyone can Keep voting till your hearts content. This is really worth the read.
THE MATH – Monday, March 31 – After Texas Counties
Thanks to phrigndumass for the work
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/phrigndumass
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x5332098
April 1, 2008 12:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Please. Obama does not want people to vote. He does not want people in MI and FL vote. He changed his tune a couple of days because his tactic of calling her withdraw was backfiring.
But rest assure Obama does not want people to vote, especially the people in MI and FL.
April 1, 2008 12:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Funny, in Texas I got mailings from Obama urging me to vote.
I guess you are a liar, too.
(BTW, it was the people of Florida and Michigan who decided against a revote, NOT Obama.)
April 1, 2008 12:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
It was not the people, it was politicians. Quit lying like Obama.
April 1, 2008 1:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
you forgot "quit lying trolls"
They are all the rage this season!
April 1, 2008 1:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
What are lying trolls? ;-)
April 1, 2008 8:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Liar.
Obama did nothing to stop the Florida revote.
Karen Thurman, Democratic Party chair in Florida, announced the decision in an e-mail message Monday afternoon, saying thousands of people had responded negatively to her proposal for a vote-by-mail primary in early June.
"We spent the weekend reviewing your messages, and while your reasons vary widely, the consensus is clear: Florida doesn't want to vote again," she wrote. "So we won't. A party-run primary or caucus has been ruled out, and it's simply not possible for the state to hold another election, even if the Party were to pay for it."
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/03/17/florida_revote_plan_scuttled_m.html
I'd love to see you acknowledge this, and start blaming the Democrats of Florida, but I'm not holding my breath.
April 1, 2008 2:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly.
The only plan the Clinton team had in place post-Super Tuesday was to place a crown on her head, thus not letting people vote for almost five months straight.
Man I can't wait till this crap is over. Such a pathetic candidate.
April 1, 2008 12:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is really rich coming from someone is trying to use corrupt party insiders (super delegates) to loot and steal the election by completely disenfranchising all those who have voted. So it is okay for Hillary and her Minions to over-rule the will of the voters while making false claims about Obama wanting to end the Primary when he has said repeatedly over the last several days that she should be in the contest for as long as she wants!
Someone should go on all those TV stations to point this out.
It is unbelievable how Hillary lies and twists the facts. It at all surprising though. This is what she does best.
April 1, 2008 12:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
O he's talking about a comment earlier, that was really paraphrasing several dozen I've read from Clinton supporters and others, who say they are Obama supporters, lately. The comment is always similar and usually long, but it's an attempt to reason the commenter's way into the thinking of the SDs - I just read another one a cafe thread this morning. Invariably it goes like this: The Wright controversy has secretly convinced the SDs that Obama is too black to win, and because they have independent judgment, they will pick Clinton. Ok, that is talking about race, but I was pointing out what others are saying, not me cause my response to those comments is always the same: how the hell do you know what they're thinking?
gotalife just thinks because I went off on him the other day he can push that button any time.
Nope - that's why I went off on you - I got it out of the way.
:)
April 1, 2008 12:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary inner thought bubble: "Oh, I am losing this race and my campaign is broke and my scorched earth behavior is dropping my favorability ratings to dangerous lows. What can I do now ??? Ok, how about this.....I can use cheap and solicitous local media outlets and fudge the truth to low information voters who might not know about my deceptions about Nafta, FMLA, Schip, Ireland and 'shudder' Bosnia. I can make Obama their 'enemy'.... like seemed to work when we pushed the meme that he blocked Michigan and Florida voters......what's another lie about Obama at this point? I am in this to win it, and that's no lie."
April 1, 2008 12:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
I assume that Obama would want the race to end period, with him as the winner. That's really not that controversial.
I'm from a late voting state, and our primary vote never ever matters. It's not like we're suddenly being disenfranchised. The decision has always been made long before Oregon votes.
Should we all be attacking John McCain for disenfranchising the GOP voters of 30 states, because he won the nomination so early? How dare he!
April 1, 2008 12:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's spring break and Hillary is going wild.
How sad we Americans have to even consider Madame Bipolar for President? Many of us in New York can't wait for her to come back to us for Senate reelection.
April 1, 2008 1:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Liar, liar. Sniper fire.
April 1, 2008 1:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well played.
April 1, 2008 2:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Perfectly put.
April 1, 2008 3:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
a gem.
April 1, 2008 5:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
barry hussein obama, you made another misstep.
This is after he had all his surrogates run out and tell her to get out.
they did that to hurt her ability to raise money. THEY PLAYED DIRTY
just like they refused to let Fla. & Michigan re-vote. THEY PLAYED DIRTY
But that's ok. Just wait. If b.hussein is successful in this PLAY DIRTY campaign, then the Republicans will show him just what PLAYING DIRTY really is.
it's almost worth it to see him win!
ROFLMAO
"I am woman, here me ROAR!"
April 1, 2008 1:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
RaeKKK in The Hood. Warning: Burning Crosses adds to global warming.
April 1, 2008 1:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is okay if Obama does it.
Remind you of the gop?
April 1, 2008 1:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
You raek.
April 1, 2008 1:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
My Precious! MY Precious!!!!
April 1, 2008 1:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
At least Obama won't be lying when he talks about ducking all the bullshit being hurled at him.
April 1, 2008 1:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
ROAR now, whine in August?
April 1, 2008 2:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think this and other exaggerations, misrepresentations, and outright lies by Hillary Clinton show she's not ready for that 3:00 AM phone call. She keeps getting in trouble in the long-term for things she does for short-term gain, without even considering long-term impact. If she's this bad with time to plan, how will she function when she has to think on her feet?
Is that really the kind of Commander in Chief we need? (It IS the kind of Commander in Chief we currently have, and look how that's worked out!)
April 1, 2008 1:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary preys upon voters who are older, rual, less educated, and low income. These folk do not have the time or inclination to stay on top of the day's political gossip.
She also knows that so much of her support is based on her brand name and the wistful memories of Bill residing over better economic times. So, it's a calculated move to make baldface lies and perpetuate ignorance.
Down with ignorance, lies and corruption.
Up with sunshine laws and trustworthy, accountable elected officials.
April 1, 2008 1:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
That is exactly it, and it's really pathetic that the media never calls her out on it.
April 1, 2008 3:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Have a little compassion please. Hillary's appeal to those people is not due to the fact that she's "preying" on their weakness or because they're stupid. People like that have so much risk built into their day to day existance that their tolorance for adding any more to it is close to zero.
Hillary has marketed herself as the low risk candidate. Her brand is old and familiar and the other product they used with that brand brought them comfort and relief. If you're in that demographic, Obama looks like a crazy insane risk to you.
We disagree. We believe the tendency of old school Democrats to go with the "low risk" candidate time after time is why we kept getting our asses handed to us. The only time we've won since Carter was the one time we chose the "riskier" candidate, that smooth talkin' young governor of a minor state with no obvious foreign policy or national political experience. We believe you cannot really win if you are not willing to risk everything.
But if working a benefit-free service job that pays the same number of dollars I made in my first job at the now-closed down factory in 1976, scared of getting sick because I had no insurance and dismally certain that my old age would be worse than my parents, I expect I'd see the world the way they do.
April 1, 2008 3:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
NCSteve,
This is an excellent point (i.e. risk averse voters). And no doubt the reason for the very different kind of campaigning Obama is doing in Pennsylvania. The endorsement from Senator Casey and the one on one type of campaign events are no doubt designed to show Obama as a regular guy. (Franco Harris and Jerome Bettis certainly don't hurt either!) I hadn't thought about this until I read your post; I think it's a point worthy of further discussion.
April 1, 2008 4:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wish you all would quit talking about us like we aren't here.
April 2, 2008 12:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ok, so damn much is being made out of nothing here, let's talk about Hillary's incredible arrogance in calling for Obama to give it up and just be her running mate -
April 1, 2008 1:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
The big question is what lie or other invention will she bring up the week before PA primary? I guess she is planning some big big lies already.
April 1, 2008 1:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
As has happened time and time again, this latest tactic will backfire. Rather than turning undecideds against Obama, it will merely remind people WHY so many supers are flocking to Obama and are now urging Hillary to at least think about getting out. While it may also rally her pity-party base, I'd guess that it will lose more than it will gain.
April 1, 2008 1:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
And honestly, to getalife, this whole "troll" name calling in every single post you make reminds me of kindergarten. You are serving no one by acting like a 5 year old. Most commenters here on TPM are thoughtful, but you strive so hard to bring down the level of discourse it is insulting, which I guess is your point. But seriously, it's at the point now whenever I see your screen name or avatar, my eyes glaze over and I scroll down and far away from your comment. Whatever point or argument you may have had instantly vanishes.
Falling on deaf ears, I know, but just had to say it.
April 1, 2008 1:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
"1) Obama is not a Muslim. But he continues to insist he never was. This is a plain lie. Why he makes it, remains beyond us.
2) He claims no relationship to Islam. Utter lie. A majority of his brothers and sisters, and other relatives are Muslim.
3) Obama’s opposition to the Iraq war, while laudable in hindsight made little sense in 2002, except when his family, ethnic, and religious identity enter the equation.
5) Obama consistently downplays his relationship with Jeremiah Wright.
6) Lies about Wright’s personal influence.
7) Lies about his involvement with Wright’s politics, and the politics of Wright’s Church.
Obama forces Jeremiah Wright to dissimulate about the nature of his church, his and their views, opinions, and achievements.
9) Obama dissimulates on Wright’s past association with Farrakhan.
10) Obama employs Nation of Islam, in the past and present.Lets them go untouched, which
11) Raises concerns about Obama’s own stance on the Nation of Islam.
12) Obama dissimulates about his former take on Israel, and the Palestinians, putting in question his present stance.
13) Obama misrepresents his background, and the context from which he hails, for political purposes, and
14) his books are fraught with lies about himself and who he i.
15) Obama’s campaign deliberately exploits his racial identity, to shield their candidate from regular media grilling.
16) Obama has chosen a deliberate strategy of evasion and vagueness in tackling tough issues. He does not take a stand, and he wont.
17) Obama’s rise to prominence, in Chicago, is fraught with deus ex machine events, and strange circumstances.
18) Why Obama’s record in Chicago, has not received a proper vetting or review by the national media, is puzzling.
19) Obama entered Havard because his father was an Alumnus.
20) It is not clear when changed his name from Barry Soetoro, and why.
21) The Media refuse to ask him questions about all of the above. Why?
22) Obama is a pathological liar, hence so are the media. He is a phony, and the media are complicit in foisting him on the Democratic party.
Obama lies and has lied on numerous occasions. He lacks the honesty and integrity required of a presidential candidate. If we do not act to assure his defeat in the Democratic primary, the Republicans armed with knowledge of Obama’s lies, will crush us in the presidential elections. They will disembowel him before the election gets started."
http://www.stop-obama.org/?p=105
April 1, 2008 1:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
"This is a plain lie. Why he makes it, remains beyond us."
Hearing voices again? I think "all" of you need to take your meds.
April 1, 2008 1:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
I kind of miss the Scalia avatar.
April 1, 2008 2:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think this one is my favorite:
Yes. And his senate career is replete magic realism.
April 1, 2008 2:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
It sounds to me like gotalife is bummed that dembillc edged him out for the "Troll I'd most like to have a beer with" award. So gotalife redoubles its efforts. The TIMLTHABW race ain't over till gotalife concedes!
April 1, 2008 5:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
While wathing MSNBC this morning, she made similar comments to the AFL-CIO group.
April 1, 2008 1:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Would some reporter please call the Clintons on their hypocrisy. It takes alot of balls for the campaign that told students in Iowa that they shouldn't participate, that sued in Nevada to block shift workers from participating, that challenged entire precincts in texas to disqualify voters that it is not they but Senator Obama that wants to block people from voting. When will someone ask her about this?
More needs to be said, by god, because someone did everything she could to try to thwart the district and country conventions in Texas last weekend. Every damn dirty Repug trick in the book, from sending out robocalls and emails that purported to be from the Democratic Party and said the convention was cancelled, or moved, to having goon squads at the conventions, holding them up for literally hours double checking credentials that were perfectly fine, filing protests against credentials, and just about the whole Rove "this is how you steal elections" handbook.
April 1, 2008 1:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
She's a disgusting liar.
April 1, 2008 1:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
The big question is what lie or other invention will she bring up the week before PA primary? I guess she is planning some big big lies already.
Highly likely.
I'd like to see Obama, just once, call her on the carpet and publicly tell her to stop lying. Tell people that his patience is long, but her continuing behavior is outrageous, undignified, and seriously calls into question her fitness to be running for president.
Of course, the Bosnia lies, the Chelsea at 9/11 lies, the NAFTA lies, the Iraq tapdancing and lies, the Iran tapdancing (and maybe lies?), and on and on are certainly having their own effect. She still doesn't understand that blogs and YouTube are serious hazards for serial liars.
April 1, 2008 1:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
After reading this page I'm now convinced that most of the pro-Hillary posters are not actually pro-Hillary, nor are they trolls. They're Conceptual Artists creating the looniest, loopiest nonsense they can come up with. Must be pitching for a big Guggenheim grant or something.
Come on Yoko! I know it's you back there! Fess up!
April 1, 2008 1:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
See, here's why she needs to get out of the race. If she'd tell the truth, I'd support her position, but she's flat-out lying in order to try to defeat Obama, and that's simply unacceptable.
Hillary really should consider going off somewhere and fucking herself.
April 1, 2008 1:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
As has happened time and time again, this latest tactic will backfire. Rather than turning undecideds against Obama, it will merely remind people WHY so many supers are flocking to Obama and are now urging Hillary to at least think about getting out.
It's having a big impact already. Obama has gotten a net increase of 23 super delegates since March 1, compared to Hillary's 6. The last time a super delegate endorsed her was on March 19, about 2 weeks ago. Obama has added 6 since then.
Hey, Hillary. Here's a hint for you. If you want to rally Democratic Party insiders, DO NOT DO ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
- Endorse John McCain over your Democratic rival.
- Put your hubby on Rush Limbaugh's show on the day of the TX primary.
- Be filmed playing footsie with Richard Mellon Scaif, the man who accused you of murdering Vince Foster.
- Make your case by sending out copies of an article from the American Spectator.
- Send Ed Rendell to Faux News and have him state that they have the fairest primary coverage.
Just more examples of Hillary's bad judgment.
April 1, 2008 1:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary is the only Democrat with the creativity and the guts to send this message to voters. HRC 2008, woo hoo!!
April 1, 2008 1:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
While either candidate would be better than anything Republican Hillary and Bill need to pack it in. They are acting selfishly and not in the best interests of this country. Michigan and Florida decided to piss their votes down their leg. The only people interested in a do over are the Clintons. Hillary, you lost and you have no right to claim foul now. You are behaving as if it was your destiny to be the next president. In case you haven't figured it out we are sick of Washington's "business as usual" and you are one of the prime examples. You are not entitled to anything. These are not offices for life. We don't want more of the same. Seeing the folks on the podium with you in Iowa after your defeat was scary. The same old Washington playerz.
April 1, 2008 1:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary is staying in until the very last ... cent of that $5 million loan is recovered.
April 1, 2008 1:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Can we all pitch in to get her to go away?
If so, I'll sell my X-box to move things along...
April 1, 2008 2:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wait, did Obama call for her to leave the race during their Bosnia trip?
God knows how she heard it with all that sniper fire.
April 1, 2008 2:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
I truly hope some member of the press calls her on this lie or, at the very least, asks her to name precisely when Obama made this statement. The truth is, he hasn't.
April 1, 2008 2:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is it me? Or does she look more and more like Margaret Thatcher?
She could use a little more gravitas.
April 1, 2008 2:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is it me? Or does she look more and more like Margaret Thatcher
O sometimes I see her as Livia: "Make me a goddess, Claudius. Please, I've always wanted to be a goddess..."
April 1, 2008 2:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary: "I, on the other hand, will happily lie to you that your vote actually means something."
How is that less of an insult to voters?
April 1, 2008 2:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah Obama getting into Harvard had nothing to do with the fact that he went to Columbia...
Thats still a good school right?
April 1, 2008 2:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
This "news" interview sounds more like propaganda issued through a Clintonista friendly surrogate. You know, more of "Who are you going to call at 3 AM when you need to be protected?".Hillary plays the fear card first - remember Ohio - and now plays the let's tell a real Whopper and see how many people swallow it. (Speaking of swallowing, someone ask Bill about someone who swallows.)
The more Clinton speaks, the more she sounds like Karl Rove is pumping her campaign management with Bush-Cheney tactics used in 2004.
Is Hillary having one of those perimenopausal moments, or has she stopped taking her HRT meds? It's pretty shocking watching the real debilitation going on her with all of her slanderous remarks. Maybe voters in Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Kentucky, and West Virginia ougth to voiew that Tuzla "landing under sniper fire and running for cover to save our lives" tape.
Hillary, and henchmen, it's all about credibility. You can fool some of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time. Sen. Clinton, go cuddle up next to Joseph Lieberman, for only he can appreciate your trash talking ways. HRC, you've lost it and only those angry white men and feministas who will love you for all of your faults still believe in that tripe your campaign now spews forth on main stream media, like FOX, and Gov. Rendell's ridiculous commentary.
April 1, 2008 2:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Who else can bring together the angry white men and feministas? Bringing people together is a bad thing?
April 1, 2008 5:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Come on people...
You know you can't spell Hillary without L-I-A-R!!
April 1, 2008 3:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Get real trolls"
The funniest thing I've read today.
I do wish to be charitable to Sen. Clinton. Perhaps all this posturing of herself as the Tigress of Tuzla, Peace Maker of Ireland and the Protectoress of the People's Vote is all part of that CIC Test that she repeatedly tells us she is passing as is John McCain't. This shows us, again, that she can be just as confused as John McCain't, on Day One.
Damn. She won me over. I wish our primaries were still going on. Fer shure I'd run out and vote for her. Repeatedly. Oh wait, she already told us that our votes do not count because no Dem nominee will carry my state in the GE. Certainly, if she is the Dem nominee she will not carry my swing state. Obama has a better chance.
April 1, 2008 3:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
This shows, yet again, that Hillaryland lacks the character our country needs to follow the GW Bush presidency.
April 1, 2008 3:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
I find it interesting that her southern twang came out a bit for this interview. Funny....she didn't sound like that whilst campaigning in New England.
April 1, 2008 4:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
She's also comparing herself to Rocky Balboa, "a fighter who didn't quit" or some such nonsense.
As Randi Rhodes just pointed out, Rocky lost the big fight in the original film.
April 1, 2008 4:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama's going down. Sooner or later -- hopefully sooner.
If he gets the nomination, when he goes down in flames to McCain, you can all scream how it was all Hillary's fault! That'll make you all feel better, and give you validation to continue your intense hatred of anything Clinton. How happy you'll be! Kind of too bad that we'll be so consumed fighting President Crazy Train that your Hillary hatred may have to take a back seat for a while though... ;(
Oh, the Silver Lining! If O's the nominee, you will all suddenly remember Corporate press is no friend of the Democratic Party, which you seem to have conveniently forgotten for the short-term.
April 1, 2008 4:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Huh?
This is supposed to convince to vote for Hillary?
Why? Because she's somehow immune to the media that's she's been complaining about during the whole election?
Seriously, if Hillary can't get a break during the PRIMARY, what makes you think she'll get a free pass in the General?
April 1, 2008 5:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
October 11, 2007
Flashback: Does Michigan Matter to Clinton?
Hillary Clinton, during which she was asked about the Michigan primary:
"I personally did not think it made any difference, whether or not my name was on the ballot. You know, it's clear, in this election they're
having, it is not going to count for anything."
http://www.youtube.com/user/MDRUDGE
April 1, 2008 4:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nafta
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BrPZYbCdJ4
April 1, 2008 6:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hahahahaha Hillary says Obama wants her to quit? Didn't she think that he'd be quitting by Super Tuesday. What a joke and transparent loser this woman is becoming.
How about comparing herself to Rocky Balboa? I'll run with that....
Rocky Balboa did run up the museum steps, and didn't quit - but if you've ever been to the spot, its about 10 steps, not the massive staircase in the movie. Deceptive filming, just like Hillary's deceptive campaign.
True, Rocky Balboa never quit, but he also lost...split decision to Apollo Creed. He didn't win, so I guess she's finally admitting defeat with the Rocky comparison?
Once again the ever intelligent Mrs. Clinton steps in a pile of her own crap. Unbelievable...
April 1, 2008 6:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
OH MY BAD. Your position is totally misrepresented. You just want a meaningless primary where their votes do not count. Much more democratic of you.
April 1, 2008 7:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
How about making it meaningful, then, by having your candidate win more states? Oh, and within the rules that were agreed to by all PRIOR to the process. Selective forgetfulness, I love that!
Duck! SNIPER FIRE!
Whew! Just a poem-toting 8-year-old. Stand down, everyone.
April 1, 2008 8:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rules that were agreed to berfore the primaries - absolutely. Like superdelegates vote their conscience and not by whoever has the lead in delegates. And Hillary does not need to win more states just more delegates - elected or super to get to the magic number. Glad we are in agreement and in sync with the rules for the democratc primary as they were created.
April 1, 2008 10:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's in here somewhere. I tried a search but didn't find it. It was a recent post where a blogger here (sorry, don't remember the name) calculated the number of delegates awarded based on polls and estimated wins for each in the remaining states. After all that Obama's "magic number" is 75 whereas Clintons is something like 212. Based on the trend since super Tuesday I'd say getting 75 more supers for Obama is not a stretch. Clinton's 212 is. Since ST he has gained about 68 supers whereas she has gained 10.
BTW Does anyone have a link to that post?
April 1, 2008 10:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
If Clinton can't win, why are you ObamaDupeees so frantic?
Let the race run until the supers gut-up and endorse Obama.(Don't think they will or have the guts to do their job),they want HRC to take them off the hook by tossing in the towel. Nancy P. is now waffling and Harry R. doesn't want to get involved, and Howard D's ass is hanging out.
A number of the ones who have gone against popular vote and endorsed BHO, claims their kids talked them into it. Kinda like the story about a church deacon who claimed he found his winning lottery ticket in a parking lot.
April 1, 2008 10:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm feelin' pretty good, actually. Senator Clinton seems to be doing most of the heavy lifting herself.
Maybe its because I threw out my TV (best decision ever)or it might be my blocking of Election Central for all but 15 minutes a day, or it just might be the kool aide, but Clinton's messaging is just suckin' wind in my mind.
Disenfranchising? That's just fucking childish. And I am straight-up GIDDY that so many people here and across the country can see this for the bullshit that it is.
Nah, I'm not uptight about it right now. I say BRING IT ON! The harder she flails, the more people realize they don't want anything to do with it.
And if she, by some miracle or machine, pulls an upset, I'll still vote for her. Right before I move out of the country.
April 2, 2008 5:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
The one thing Senator Clinton does well is lie! Check this out:
Hillary Clinton's NAFTA Story Exposed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BrPZYbCdJ4
April 1, 2008 11:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
The fact that Clinton's best case for the nomination is a flimsy case against Obama is very telling and very sad at the same time.
She's lost toughness, experience, and independent appeal. Obama is eating into her base every day. She needs to have strengths, not just point out his potential weaknesses.
Plus, every time they mention 527s using Wright, I picture swiftboating ads with her voice and the Tuzla images. Running against McCain, that's suicide right there. They already hate her, so that would be all the Repugs need to to do make sure every republican out there goes and votes against her. I'm sure the superdelegates see the writing on the wall as well.
April 2, 2008 12:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary's lying is the gift that keeps on giving. Thanks for the link election08. Priceless.
April 2, 2008 1:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
From the wire:
March 31, 2008
Watergate-Era Judiciary Chief of Staff: Hillary Clinton Fired For Lies, Unethical Behavior
http://www.northstarwriters.com/dc163.htm
April 2, 2008 2:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hum, when HRC "mis-spokes", then it's a down wright evil lie, wright?
When BHO "mis-remembers" then it's not a lie, wright?
Now what is the difference between "mis-spoke and mis-rember"?
Now I remember. When you tell the story the same way more than once, then it's a "mis-spoke", i.e a lie.
When you tell it more than once, but slightly different each time, then it's a "mis-remember",and not a lie. Wright (sorry can't help it,thanks to df)
April 2, 2008 2:47 PM | Reply | Permalink