Hillary's First "Contrast" Ad In Indiana Attacks Obama On Gas Tax Holiday
Here's Hillary's first "contrast" ad in Indiana -- it's a spot that hits Obama for saying "No" to a suspension of the gas tax, an issue that's been propelled to the forefront of the campaign by rising gas prices and the new battle between Dems over the so-called "gas tax holiday" idea...
The ad, which also hits Obama for allegedly saying "No" to a freeze in foreclosures, seeks to paint Hillary as an aggressive problem solver on the economic issues that are causing anxiety among the struggling voters that she's been successful among thus far in the big states.
Here's a Washington Post fact check on the gas-tax-holiday issue. And here's the Obama campaign's response to criticism on the foreclosure issue.
Late Update: A decent rundown on the battle between the two Dems on the gas tax holiday is here.
Late Late Update: The Hillary campaign says the same ad is also running in North Carolina.















Kudos to Hillary for embracing a big Republican proposal, a total gift to oil companies, which she once denounced as such, and now embraces so she can buy a few votes and attack Obama:
http://www.thepersonalispolitical.com/2008/04/hillary-adopts-another-right-wing.html
Hypocrite.
April 29, 2008 5:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
And Saint Obama's vote for the $150Billion dollar tax rebates that are going out right now was not a cynical political ploy? It's something and Saint Obama was not above doing it at $150Billion, why is he shy about this piddling $9Billion dollar tax relief?
Hypocritical Saint Obama!
April 29, 2008 8:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let's say I use 10 gallons/week. That's less
than $2/week. In 3 months, that's less than $25.
Your mileage may vary, blah blah blah.
Just one question, then.
Since "Americans are hurting, need a break, etc
etc" (all the arguments for suspending the
gas tax), then why not abolish the gas tax
altogether? After all, the proponents have
a way to make up the revenue. Heck, I'd save
$100/year for the rest of my life! With that
kind of money, I'd stimulate the economy and
get myself an SUV and save $200/year!! Hooray!
April 29, 2008 11:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here is Dean Baker's analysiys of Hillary's plan and the way it was portrayed in the NYT:
http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/beat_the_press_archive?month=04&year=2008&base_name=the_nyt_allows_senator_clinton
April 29, 2008 9:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Great ad.
Close the deal Senator and lets win this time.
April 29, 2008 5:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Haha, keep dreaming. Unless she is about to win Indiana by 100%, the math says she can't win.
April 29, 2008 5:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't suppose you actually read the fact check provided?
Of course not, Clintonistas hate facts.
April 29, 2008 5:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yep, this one is as good as lead balloons!
April 29, 2008 5:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Do you drive a car? Do you care about our highways and bridges. Is there any level of pandering by Clinton that might offend you?
April 29, 2008 6:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Close WHAT deal? If Michigan and Florida are seated and she wins every remaining state, she'll still be behind in pledged delegates and states won. What deal does she have to close?
April 30, 2008 8:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
It could be any worse than Hillary's Iraq Holiday that's cost 4,000 soldiers their lives.
April 29, 2008 5:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ouch
April 30, 2008 8:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
And this is a little something about the Illinois tax that the factcheck refers to:
While from my standpoint, almost any policy that encourages fossil fuel consumption is bad thing, there is a very important economic distinction between the Illinois gas tax and the federal gas tax. Namely, the Illinois gas tax is assessed on a percentage basis, whereas the federal tax is assessed on a flat, per-gallon basis.
What that means is that when gas prices go up, Illinois will be making more revenue from its gas tax. In 2000, gas prices spiked in Illinois by about 50%, and so the state was bringing in far more revenue from the gas tax than it has anticipated. Thus, it might have been "fair" to give consumers a break; they had already paid about nine months' worth of the state's usual gas tax receipts in the first six months of the year.
However, this is not true of the federal gas tax. In fact, the federal government will bring in less revenue from the gas tax when prices go up, because the price increases will somewhat curb demand (it's also worth noting that the federal gas tax has not been re-indexed to inflation in about a dozen years, when the last increase was signed into law by Bill Clinton). So, at the very least, there was not the issue in Illinois about a budget shortfall resulting from the gas tax suspension, whereas that very much would be a problem at the federal level.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/4/28/03322/1182/827/504632
April 29, 2008 5:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Urg, f-ing TPM, that whole thing should have been in blockquotes.
April 29, 2008 5:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, and I thought YOU were that smart. :-)
April 29, 2008 7:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
And that federal gas tax goes to the highway fund. Hillary's helping make bridges collapse, like the one in Michigan, and create more potholes in the roles by shortchanging the states $9 billion dollars with a badly thought out proposal that only saves American families $25 dollars TOTAL at the gas pump over three months.
April 29, 2008 5:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have a feeling that this might be one of those ads that ends up backfiring...
April 29, 2008 5:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, this one should be pretty easy to rebut.
April 29, 2008 5:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yep, and it lets Obama maximize his money by going after both Hillary and McCain.
Perfect opportunity.
I give it 24 hours, probably less, before the counter ad is out from the Obama campaign.
April 29, 2008 5:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Was there a bridge collapse in Michigan that I missed, or do you mean Minnesota?
April 29, 2008 5:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
First your name, now your avatar.
I've had a hard enough time adjusting to Tena's new pic, but now you! I know I'm not the only one who mostly just scans for familiar avatars.
April 29, 2008 5:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Genghis started it.
(actually, does that mean that my avatar has changed? I tried to change it today, but at least on my screen I am still seeing the same old fuzzy photo of me smiling at my son's birth.)
April 29, 2008 6:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's changed now.
You bagpiper, you!
April 29, 2008 6:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bagpipes are the only instrument more annoying that the banjo ;-)
April 29, 2008 7:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
fogu might have you there.
April 29, 2008 7:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
I play the banjo.
April 29, 2008 7:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
People still play the banjo?
April 30, 2008 8:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Fionna McCallan thinks (and I tend to agree with her) that the whole world divides into those who are Gaels deep down, and those who are Sassanach's deep down. The former love the pipes; the latter loathe them. Needless to say, as a piper I am in the former category, but as the Angelic Doctor was wont to say de gustibus non est disputandum.
April 29, 2008 7:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Horrendously bad ideas ARE EXCELLENT NEWS!! FOR HILLARY!!!
April 29, 2008 5:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
God, idiotic, you are priceless and keep a lot of us from putting our feet through the computer screen! ;)
April 29, 2008 5:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
After all, good ideas require hard work!
April 29, 2008 5:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Haha, will you marry me, idiotic?
April 29, 2008 7:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
The best thing about this ad is how it points out one more time that Hillary is no better than a Republican.
So if she steals the nomination I'll feel no remorse at all for voting for Nader and rat-f*cking her and her obnoxious ass supporters into history's dustbin.
April 29, 2008 5:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
This isn't a Republican idea it is a stupid idea. Worse than that it is the worse kind of politics, fool the voters you are doing something for them when nothing of the sort is the case.
This is promoting bogus ideas to win votes. This issue is all about who will tell the American people what they think they want to hear, and who will tell them the truth.
Obama needs to keep hitting this hard.
April 29, 2008 10:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think John McCain has found a viable running mate in Hillary Clinton.
McCain-Clinton: Both love the iraq war, both want to obliterate iran, both love the idea of giving tax breaks to oil companies, both of them
the similarities are nearly endless.
which one is the republican againg? Its kind of confusing telling them apart.
April 29, 2008 5:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
for some reason the rest of that was cut off...
"both of them love lobbyists, both of them are complete panderers who will say anything to get elected."
April 29, 2008 5:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Took the words right out of my mouth.
April 29, 2008 5:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
So much for the hard-nosed policy expert. If she's eager to jump on this bit of cheap demagoguery, why should anyone believe she'll take any other problems seriously?
April 29, 2008 5:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
If she was willing to vote for the war there is nothing she wont vote for, if it is politically expedient.
April 29, 2008 5:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
right, when every economist out there thinks its a bad policy and you're out there advocating for it, it either means that a)you dont mind following bad policy, or b) you just want to score cheap political points by embracing what sounds like a good idea to uninformed voters. this is also called "pandering".
April 29, 2008 5:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bullseye!
April 29, 2008 10:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Forget the nose plug.
I will not vote for The Monster.
April 29, 2008 5:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Do sizable numbers of democrats in Indiana actually buy into the nonsense of a gas tax holiday? I guess that I think too highly of the good democrats of the Hoosier state to believe that they would be impressed by this sort of nonsense. A gas tax holiday is a horrible idea. I expect the democrats of IN to see through this nonsense.
April 29, 2008 5:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
no one ever lost an election by trying to lower taxes...so hillary thinks she can score some points here.
i think the people of indiana don't pay attention to things like "fact checks" and policy experts. All they will know is that one candidate wants to cut gas taxes and the other one doesnt.
and, its been my experience that people like lower taxes as opposed to higher ones, even if they don't realize that that tax cut will mean bridges and highways will fall into disrepair and endanger potentially millions of americans.
April 29, 2008 5:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
My thinking runs to this effect: Indiana is a thoroughly red state. There are not that many democrats in Indiana. As such, the few that are to be found are disporportionately the well-read, highly educated liberal types. Maybe this sort of cheap stunt should appeal to broad masses of Indianans as a whole, but the democrats in the state should know better.
April 29, 2008 5:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think you're right about that.
If it's anything like Kansas and Missouri -
don't you agree Missouri is rather like that?
April 29, 2008 5:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ah yes, except in Indiana you get to request your ballot at the polls. Heck some years I grab a Republican Ballot because I can't stand the thought of somebody making it to the generals in November (the psuedo-drawback is that I get a lot of Republican campaign mail now). Assuming people are more excited about the federal races than the local ones (which admittedly are sometimes settled in the primary season because there are no non-Republican challengers in many cases), I'm sure plenty of people who usually vote Republican are being lured into asking for the Dem ballot this year.
April 30, 2008 5:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hope you're right.
"Gas tax holiday" sounds like a pretty good idea to me, but maybe I'm easily impressed.
And please note: I know it's a bad idea, that it's unworkable, and that it's just silly--because who gives a crap whether Clinton or McCain call for a gas tax holiday? They can't get it done, singlehandedly, so the whole thing is a giant panderfest.
But it does sound good.
Then again, I'm from Connecticut, a state that doesn't count anymore.
Maybe I'm just bitter.
April 29, 2008 5:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
It sounds like a good idea until you read about it. Go up to the entry and click on the fact check, it does a reasonably good job of spelling out the facts.
The Washington Post gave it two pinnochios.
April 29, 2008 5:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, I definitely know it's a bad idea.
But it sounds good. And gas for super unleaded just hit 4.09 in my neighborhood (not that I get super unleaded).
Gas that costs less sounds good.
Even though the rational part of my brain says "Panderfest!!!!" and "Gas should be $10.00 a gallon, and maybe the country will wise up!!!@#!", the reptilian part of my brain says "IT'S CHEAPER!! AND THAT'S GOOD!!!"
What can I say?
April 29, 2008 5:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think I know you well enough (as well as you can know anyone online) to say that the rational part of you will win out.
It does sound good. Of course, just 8 years ago, gas was around a dollar a gallon and I drove a pimped out Tahoe. I still miss my Tahoe...
April 29, 2008 5:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
A Tahoe? AKA oceanliner on wheels?
: )
If Obama rebuts this with an ad that says "Hillary doesn't want to repair our bridges and roads..." or something to that effect, then I'll agree that her ad doesn't sound good any longer...
April 29, 2008 5:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
We have two sales tax holidays in Florida -- one right before hurricane season for approved hurricane supplies, and one in August for back-to-school clothes and supplies under $50/item. Savings of $6.50 per $100 spent. I suppose for some families at back to school time, every dime counts. To me, seems more like a state government "gee, aren't we great?" thing. Still, everyone absolutely loves the idea.
I think the gas tax holiday is a dumb idea for a lot of reasons. Not the least of which is that it does nothing at all for the actual price of gas.
April 29, 2008 5:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Summary from the fact check: "The advocates of a "gas tax holiday" are exaggerating the benefits to consumers from their proposal. If the Illinois experience is a guide, there is likely to be some reduction in the price of gas, but it would fall well short of the size of the tax reduction. In order to pay for the tax cut, the government would have to cut back on highway construction and maintenance or find some other way of plugging the shortfall in revenues to the Highway Trust Fund."
April 29, 2008 5:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Coming from Minnesota, a state that had one of its most recognizable bridges collapse, anything that could result in highway maintenance cuts is unacceptable in my mind.
April 29, 2008 5:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sigh. Clinton pandering and Obama telling the painful truth...again.
I guess he learned from this strategy's failure in Illinois. Good for him.
He is amazingly smart...almost always right...and clearly a change from Clinton and McCain.
April 29, 2008 5:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
I would cheerfully rush to the polls to be the first in line to vote for the candidate who would promise us a gas tax hike. We need to cut back on our petroleum consumption and prices hikes are the only thing that will make that happen. We waste so much petroleum already that I can think of few policies more irresponsible than moving to encourage more consumption by lowering the price.
April 29, 2008 5:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Pretty much. We have this tendency of stringing up by the thumbs any politician that insinuates suburbanites driving Bradley Fighting Vehicles to pick up their kids from soccer practice should maybe cut back on their fuel consumption, though.
April 29, 2008 5:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm with you.
Mr Tena and I were talking last night about packaging, which I bitch about alot - it's absurd to open a box and find another box of sealed plastic with your stuff in it inside the other box. He said one of our problems is bad design in everything - and that's true because we could afford to be bad designers - wasteful - in the past. Not anymore.
Europe has always had better design. They also have always relatively high gas prices.
I don't think high gas prices are such a bad thing, altogether, either. I hate hurting those who can less afford such things - but there has to be a line somewhere and we're probably too far gone in global warming now.
April 29, 2008 5:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good for Obama refusing to pander, especially in a meek "Me, too!" responsive fashion to a half-assed McCain proposal. I've had enough of that garbage, thanks very much.
Obama framed this issue very well at the Chapel Hill rally last night. Reminded me of the very best reasons to support Obama.
April 29, 2008 5:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
I love your new picture.
"You're out of your league Donny!"
April 29, 2008 5:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's a crappy proposal, but hey - a debate on a real issue feels refreshing
April 29, 2008 5:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
That ad is AWESOME! Hillary Clinton makes taxes on gasoline look like pansy-fairy gay nerds.
April 29, 2008 5:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is there something I'm missing about a gas tax? It doesn't seem much more effective than a politician throwing five dollar bills out of the window of their limousine.
April 29, 2008 5:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's not. At all.
April 29, 2008 5:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Er, gas tax holiday, I meant. I'm glad politicians still aren't above deeming us short-sighted imbeciles who like the word "holiday" and enjoy being handed small lumps of change.
April 29, 2008 5:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Chocolate Milk in the lunch room!
April 29, 2008 5:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Clinton promises NO MORE HOMEWORK!!!
April 29, 2008 5:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
FWIW, Washington Post gave this proposal Two Pinocchios, which they define as:
"Significant omissions and/or exaggerations. Some factual error may be involved but not necessarily. A politician can create a false, misleading impression by playing with words and using legalistic language that means little to ordinary people."
But since her Bosnia thriller was Four Pinocchios, maybe it means she's getting better? ;-)
April 29, 2008 5:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oilbama doesn't like the gas tax holiday after voting for Dick Cheney's Energy Bill? Wonder why that is.
McCain and Hillary voted against it.
Say it isn't so!
April 29, 2008 5:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Go read the fact check provided please.
They gave it two Pinocchios.
April 29, 2008 5:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Which just proves that it's a bad idea.
She voted with the Republicans on this? And of course you are bragging about that...
April 29, 2008 5:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Richardson is on Hardball right now ridiculing Hillary's gas holiday pandering.
She's going to get creamed on this one. What a moron.
April 29, 2008 5:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Pfft, what was he, Secretary of Energy? When Hillary's president, she's going to appoint a Gas Price Reduction Czar!
April 29, 2008 5:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
She is wrong on this, and Obama should hit her and hit her hard. The gas tax holiday would yield only short term savings, and it would result in long term loss of jobs and further degradation of our national infrastructure.
April 29, 2008 5:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, it's about as useful a long-term solution as the "economic stimulus package" that people are going to use to pay off bills or dump right into their IRAs.
April 29, 2008 5:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
...or use to fill up that gas tank. Think of it as an "Oil Company Profit Margin Stimulus Package".
April 29, 2008 6:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is a perfect opportunity for Obama to attack both Hillary and McSame all at the same time.
I doubt they will let it slide.
April 29, 2008 5:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
The most deceptive part of this ad is when the screen flashes that Hillary supports using a "windfall tax" to suspend the gas tax, and then flashes that Obama opposes suspending the gas tax. Most people not well-versed in the exact positions of the two candidates would come away thinking that Obama would not support suspending the gas tax even if it was balanced with a tax on the windfall profits of oil companies. There's no way that the implication was unintentional.
Barack Obama needs to show a little backbone here, and hit her hard over her pandering and dishonesty.
April 29, 2008 5:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Replacing the excise tax with a windfall tax just means it won't affect the highway funds. It still won't affect prices and that is the only reason one needs to reject this perfect example of trying to fool the voters.
By the way, Obama has talked about supporting a windfall profits taxes on oil companies and using the money to fund alternative energy.
April 29, 2008 10:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
The problem with using windfall taxes on the oil companies is it solves nothing and the taxes lost are worth more because of discount rates that will start to accrue because the windfall taxes won't be collected immediately. It's a small amount, but it's simply not efficient. And the gas prices will rise to compensate so we still pay the same amount and actually lose money in the long run for infrastructure repairs.
It's more scary to me to think that Clinton actually thinks this is a good idea. Pandering is extremely annoying, but I can handle that, the other option is she is completely clueless on this issue and that's bad.
If you want to lower prices then ask people to carpool (won't happen without incentives), ask the oil companies to build more refineries (won't happen without incentives), or start investing in alternative transportation (won't happen without incentives). All of which aren't sexy, but public administration rarely is.
April 30, 2008 9:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
LeroyS,
You mean that Senator Clinton isn't a Republican?!?
Damn, I woulda never have know.
Spreading fear with the tinge o' desparation one day at a time . . ..
April 29, 2008 5:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow, if they paired up imagine how many senior moments the General Election would provide.
Personally, I can't wait for Hillary to tell us how many years SHE spent in a Vientemese Prison Camp. What do you think, 7 years? 12 years?
April 29, 2008 5:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
LOL!!!!!!
April 29, 2008 5:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Re: "It sounds like a good idea until you read about it." That's true, but you are a rational human being, one who can weigh the cost to society vs. personal benefit.
How many voters will see through this is unknowable but Obama needs to hit Hillary hard on this one, for the sheer irresponsibility and weakness of it all.
April 29, 2008 5:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Local (Fox) news in DC covered the story pretty accurately. Interviewed a guy at a gas station saying he thought it sounded good, then proceeded to interview a slew of other folks including economists who explain how it was a sham and solely intended to get votes not do anything to help people.
It was pretty brutal toward those who think this is a good idea.
April 29, 2008 11:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is such a phoney issue. The gas tax pays for roads and repairs. If it goes, infrastructure decays and 300,000 road workers lose their jobs this summer. What a fraud Senator Clinton sometimes is. I suggest she drives up 88 from Binghamton to Albany before you demagogue this issue. The potholes and ruts are enormous. It's the oil companies profits that are causing this -- not the frigging gas tax. That is returned to us in road repairs and jobs! What a bad idea.
April 29, 2008 5:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
What Obama should say (albeit more politely): Hillary Clinton -- Big Oil Whore.
April 29, 2008 5:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wait a minute - it's enough that Hillary voted with McCain and Obama didn't.
That's enough for me!
April 29, 2008 5:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary really comes off as a soap opera queen...Erica Kane's mother, perhaps.
or, maybe she could star in her own cartoon...Hillary the Pander Bear.
April 29, 2008 5:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
This "argument" by Hillary makes me want to throw up. Nice "solution" for the economy here, like throwing a band aid on a gunshot and then ripping it off again.
Maybe in that alternate universe where Hillary wins the nomination Bob Dole (who first proposed this stupid idea) and her are on the same ticket.
Pandering, pandering, pandering to Republicans and to people who should know better, people who see cheap gas for 3 months and think it's a great idea without thinking of the consequences.
Gas Tax Holiday!?! Stupidest idea.... EVER.
April 29, 2008 5:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well I'm kind of partial to several of Bush's "ideas" as stupidest ever, but he wins by sheer volume of stupid ideas, so I'll let Dole and Hillary have this one.
April 29, 2008 5:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
So I guess my dream that we could have election that actually looked at the long term course of the country is pretty much shot.
Instead, we'll talk about a nonsensical gas tax holiday, that won't even by in effect any more by November.
It's hard to avoid the conclusion that this country deserves the shitty shitty government that we recieve.
April 29, 2008 5:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's at least exponentially more substantive that Wright or a lapel pin.
April 29, 2008 5:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
*than
April 29, 2008 5:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Don't you see that this insanity is doing to us? Discussing a panderfest of a plan that has no chance of succeeding and every chance of harming people is, in fact, a step up from a discussion of fashion accessories and narcissists.
It's the Bushification of political discourse. For 7 years, our president has been so routinely and reliably awful that almost anyone else doesn't seem so bad by comparison.
I think my head is going to explode.
April 29, 2008 6:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
I know exactly what you mean...
April 29, 2008 6:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
hahaha, touche.
April 29, 2008 6:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Please, no. I don't want to have cat brains splattered all over my screen.
April 29, 2008 6:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Weird, but Obama and Bush are on one side and Clinton and McCain are on the other. Obama and Bush are right on the policy, but I am afraid Clinton and McCain' irresponsible pander will win a lot of votes.
April 29, 2008 5:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
The gas tax holiday is a wonderful idea. After all, $3.42/gallon is soooo much better than $3.60/gallon.
April 29, 2008 5:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is soooooooooooo true.
:)
April 29, 2008 6:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
No kidding. You have to marvel at the people who drive around town to find a station that sells gas a nickel cheaper than the station they just drove by.
This is where innumeracy just kills me. A nickel less per gallon saves them on average, what, 75 cents per tankful, when they're already spending over $50 as it is. Really, people? When you go out for dinner at a nice restaurant, do you bring that $0.75 coupon with you?
This 'gas-tax holiday' is basically another version of this type of idiocy, with the added benefit that we spend even less on maintenance of highway infrastructure. What a surprise that Hillary thinks this is a good idea. No bridge collapses in New York, I suppose.
April 29, 2008 6:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey when the highway's are so bad we can't drive then who cares how much gas costs.
April 29, 2008 6:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Clinton is a fighter--for Republican policies.
April 29, 2008 6:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Would be nice if there was a debate that we could bring this up at...
April 29, 2008 6:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
And we are to believe that this "gas tax holiday" is going to see those savings passed on to the consumer? Sure, and the surge is working too. The likelihood of these savings being passed onto the consumers is about the same as Hillary taking sniper fire on the way to her limo tonight. More opportunity for the oil lobby to make big bucks, and then grease the palms of Clinton and McCain to say thank you for their indentured servitude.
April 29, 2008 6:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
that 3.42 assumes that the local gas station and oil companies won't take their share, don't forget. It would probably be more like 3.50.
April 29, 2008 6:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Meh. I'm an optimist.
April 29, 2008 6:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
"At a meeting with voters in North Carolina on Monday, Mr. Obama said lifting the gas tax for three months would save the average consumer no more than $30, a figure confirmed by Congressional analysts. Mr. Obama has previously dismissed Mr. McCainโs proposal as a โscheme.โ
โHalf a tank of gas,โ Mr. Obama told his audience. โThatโs his big solution.โ"
I can't wait for Obama's response add. The half tank of gas line is fantastic.
April 29, 2008 6:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
He should hit hard on this, using this line, showing video footage or photos of Hillary and McCain together, pointing out that this is McCain's policy and saying, we need a candidate who will fight John McCain, not agree with him.
April 29, 2008 6:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
It needs to show construction workers repairing a bridge saying "Obama wants to plan for this." And then show an oilman humping someone at the gas pumps and burning $100 bills while someone loses a wheel hitting a pothole in the background saying, "McCain and Clinton want to plan for this."
Now that's Hardball!
April 30, 2008 9:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't understand why everybody is saying that Clinton's plan would lead to crumbling roads and bridges. If her plan replaces money that is brought in by the gas tax with a windfall profit tax on oil companies, then doesn't the road fund have the same amount of money?
Now I can see the argument that prices would rise to fill the void (particularly if oil companies want to recover some of the money that's just been taxed away from them). I can also see the argument that the savings wouldn't be very much and would be spread very thin. Both of those combine to make it an empty gesture, but isn't that what politics is?
Clinton is wrong about a lot of stuff, but this doesn't seem like one of them to me.
April 29, 2008 6:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Again, her whole plan depends on the idea that oil companies won't just raise prices to cover the extra tax they are levied with, essentially making motorists pay the 18 cents per gallon in a different way. Do you trust the oil companies not to do this.
April 29, 2008 6:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well sure, and I acknowledged that in my original comment. It's an empty gesture, but I don't think it's an empty gesture that imperils our infrastructure as many are suggesting, and it's an empty gesture that will appeal to a number of voters.
April 29, 2008 6:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
The discount rate makes the taxes gained from the oil companies less because they are not collected immediately. The taxes they pay the next year is woth less than the same amount of taxes paid this year. Result: net loss in revenues needed for infrastructure, jobs lost during these months, and we don't save a goddamn thing. This is not including indirect costs of collecting the windfall taxes, the legal battles that might erupt, and lost productivity in other areas our government practitioners should be worried about.
A net loss for taxpayers, so Clinton and McCain can kiss my ass isn't worth it...unless they were willing to physically kiss my ass!
April 30, 2008 9:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
The problem is, in the real world the gas tax holiday will pass but the windfall profits tax won't. End result: less money for the highway fund.
April 29, 2008 6:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary:
"If you vote for me, I will make all of your wildest dreams come true, thank you."
April 29, 2008 6:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm putting a list together now of what I want. Just not sure where to send it. The North Pole?
April 29, 2008 6:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, Fox news
April 29, 2008 6:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
My wildest dreams are unspeakable at this moment, so I will take her on that (to get "rid" of the "this is ridiculous" factor in this election.
April 29, 2008 11:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's pretty easy to be ready on day one when you don't change anything.
April 29, 2008 6:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Clinton understands that a large percentage of the electorate is imbecilic and just want a politician to tell them what they want to hear. Those folks who want to suspend the gas tax are the first one's screaming about the collapsing highway infrastructure.
April 29, 2008 6:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
gimme, gimme, gimme. I love the smell of patronization in the morning, even if it turns into broken promises by evening, even if the promises themselves are personally non-substantial and socially counter-productive. gimme, gimme, gimme.
April 29, 2008 6:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
MSNBC is reporting that a three month moratorium on the gas tax would result in a 9 billion dollar shortfall in the highway fund and would result in 300,000 highway workers losing their jobs.
April 29, 2008 6:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
I sure hope billraleigh sees your comment, Agrippina.
April 29, 2008 6:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
At least they'll be able to drive to the unemployment office more cheaply.
April 29, 2008 7:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's probably true of McCain's plan since he hasn't (to my knowledge) proposed to replace the lost revenue with anything else.
I don't think that's necessarily true of Clinton's plan since she's been very clear that she'd only want to do it if the money was replaced with that windfall profit tax.
Maybe it's true as mans_best_friend suggested upthread that suspending the gas tax would pass and paying for it with a tax on the oil companies would not. I don't hear most people making that argument though. It just seems like a lot of people are only quoting half of her plan in a deliberate attempt to misunderstand it.
I'm not a Clinton supporter by any stretch of the imagination, but this whole discussion seems to have a lot of intellectual dishonesty about it.
April 29, 2008 7:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
No it doesn't. The windfall tax will result in a net loss for taxpayers. That's how businesses who are taxed operate. They push the costs of a tax, that will not be collected until later, onto the consumer. The money they raise to pay for the tax is worth more than the taxes they pay later. When you're talking about millions or billions of dollars, it ain't chump change.
If Clinton and McCain doesn't understand that, they are not qualified to even be Senators IMO. I think they do and they're just pandering.
April 30, 2008 9:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Breaking... Hillary proposes car that runs on tobaccy juice.
April 29, 2008 7:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Intellectual honesty has never been a strong suit of the Clintons.
This ad underscores that fact.
April 29, 2008 7:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Breaking: Clinton Proposes Flat Income Tax Rate! Story at 10!
April 29, 2008 7:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Contrast" ad?
LOL
Can't wait until Obama's first "contrast" ad and Greggie's choice of labeling.
That should be a real contrast.
April 29, 2008 7:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'ts not a great idea from an environmental POV, economically it makes some sense. Much of the opposition in the "fact check" and from the Obamites is misleading.
1. The tax cut would be offset by a tax increase on the oil companies so revenue-wise it is a wash.
2. Because it would be nationwide the oild companies would not benefit by shipping gas from state to state to take advantage of different taxation.
3. I would put more discretionary cash in the pockets of consumers which helps alleviate a recession.
It is a reasonable plan economically in tough times when oil company profits are skyrocketing.
Clinton knows and agrees that we need to invest in new sources of energy. Once the economy is righted and we have the Clinton Peace and Prosperity years those sources and technologies will be invested in.
April 29, 2008 7:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Too bad none of it is going anywhere. They might as well be debating whether or not to send a man to Venus.
April 29, 2008 7:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Can $3 a tank really be called "discretionary cash."
April 29, 2008 7:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
If it's so insignificant why would even care about the proposal?
April 29, 2008 7:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Fogu2, why Obama as a chicken for your avatar? Because he won't go along with McClainton's Gas Tax Holiday?
April 29, 2008 7:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Because it's rewarding bad behavior. We need to be giving people incentives to get off of oil, not buy more of it.
April 29, 2008 7:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
As I said, I agree that environmentally it is not a great idea. But it is also only for a short time during economic hardship.
Don't underestimate the power of relieving a little stress on working people.
And I wouldn't call it bad behavior, That hints at social engineering.
As far as global impact, China and India are of far more concern regarding greenhouse gases than the insignificant amount we might increase it for the summer months. Keep the scale in mind.
April 29, 2008 8:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
An industry specific tax? Never gonna happen, would never get off the floor.
Just because Hillary has an offset doesn't mean it's a GOOD one.
Remember we are supposed to be judging these policy proposals, just because a candidate has one doesn't mean it's good.
One would say it's the mark of how good a leader they will be.
Bob Dole dropped this idea for a reason.
April 29, 2008 7:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Even economically it is a bad idea from a long term perspective. The reason that the price is climbing is because supply is tightening while demand is expanding. Price hikes are the markets signal of this increasing scarcity. In the face of such scarcity, conservation is the most rational response and price increases are the natural impetus to induce that response. By using tax breaks to manipulate the market and lower prices, one creates a perverse incentive to consume more, even as supply continues to tighten. The long term effect of this, of course, will be to drive prices even higher. It creates a temporary relief at the cost of a greater degree of pain down the line.
If her plan included some means to bring more supply on line during the "holiday" period, this would be responsible, but of course her plan does no such thing. Indeed, by levying a "windfall profits" tax on the oil companies, she actually creates an counter-incentive against increased production. It is a recklessly irresponsible pander from both the economic and environmental viewpoints.
April 29, 2008 7:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
1. The tax cut would be offset by a tax increase on the oil companies so revenue-wise it is a wash.
Um, I'm no economist or anything, but if the tax cut is offset by a tax increase on the oil companies, won't the gas prices probably end up staying exactly the same?
Of course, you and Clinton seem so sure of yourselves, so maybe I shouldn't bother myself with thinking about it too much...
April 30, 2008 5:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Not only that, but the indirect costs of collecting the tax aren't even being considered.
April 30, 2008 9:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Why are McCain and Clinton always on the same page?
April 29, 2008 7:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
McClainton
April 29, 2008 7:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Did I forget to add...
Clinton is the best choice if you want a Democrat in the White House.
April 29, 2008 7:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Did I forget to mention.....
that you are a Republican troll posing as a Hillary supporter.
April 29, 2008 7:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
And using such an aggressive, offensive, and racist avatar.
Most of the real Hillary folks bailed from TPM months ago, and they were never, ever this nasty. Many/most were nice folk who basically respected fellow progressives. The aggression of these Hillary-posers is much more common in Freeperland, and it's what gives them away.
April 29, 2008 8:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Then why is she stealing McCain's dumbass idea?
April 29, 2008 8:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
This idea is as stale as a popcorn fart.
Seriously, this idea is from the nineties. Bob Dole ran against Bill Clinton with this idea! Conflict of interest there?
April 29, 2008 7:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary is giving us an excellent example of her leadership. With the nations transportation infrastructure failing, she proposes to cut the primary resource for funds to repair highways and brdiges. She is pandering for votes, not talking straight about the consequences of an over-consuming society and the need to sacrafice.
It is one more example of the type of judgment she exercised in voting for war in Iraq: not weighing what the evidence tells her and what is best for the nation, but weighing what is expedient and best for Hillary Clinton.
Enough. We need a leader. Hillary is not a leader.
April 29, 2008 7:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
The fact check seems to have left out the plan for revenue loss to be replaced by a windfall profit tax on the oil companies that I read somewhere was part of the Clinton plan not sure about McCain. That idea seems to make the whole ideal more palatable but then again having the candidates dispute the idea like it's something the President is going to do or even be able to do is more of a philosophical exercise.
April 29, 2008 7:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Windfall tax still results in a net loss. It is not an immediate replacement of revenues lost.
April 30, 2008 9:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
People are stupid. They actually fall for this political ploy played by typical politicians to win an election. Gas Tax Holiday is worthless. I can't believe Hillary and John think we are stupid enough to fall for it...oh wait most people are that stupid.
April 29, 2008 7:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Clinton supporters, is a Gas Tax Holiday your platform? Is she speaking for you on this?
April 29, 2008 7:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am a little stunned to learn that Clinton was supporting this. The gas tax is what? 22 cents per gallon? That'll be eaten up by the next 10-20 dollar uptick in the price of oil.
April 29, 2008 7:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
18.4 cents per gallon.
April 29, 2008 7:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Eighteen cents a gallon? That's your idea of a fix, Hillary? Okay, now what is it that keeps the oil companies from filling that eighteen cent a gallon void and tacking on another twenty five cents a gallon, just to show that they can?
In the meantime, you'll be pulling $9 billion out of the funds that should go to fixing our crumbling infrastructure and putting 300,000 people out of work. Good thinkin', Hil. You and McBush make a great team.
Here's an idea. While you're out there touring all those many states that you were born and raised in, take a look down from time to time and check out the condition of the roads and bridges. Think about the people who have to drive those things every day to get to and from work. Be sure to tell your supporters, while you're pandering your ass off to them, that you'd like to make those roads and bridges far more dangerous than they already are.
April 29, 2008 7:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just crunched some numbers for my ride (Lincoln Navigator, and I still owe way too much on it to even consider getting rid of it, and yes, it was an impulse buy - midlife crisis or something):
$0.185 savings per gallon in a 24 gallon tank = $4.44 savings per tank fill up. I fill the tank once a week. There are approximately 14 weeks between M Day and L Day so my total savings during the "gas tax holiday" would be $62.16, less than what I pay for one tank of gas.
How would I spend my savings? At $4.44 per week I would probably buy one vente latte at Starbucks, not much else. Would I drive more? Unlikely.
Gas tax holidays are a lousy way to give the citizens a break.
P.S. TenaX, love your new look.
April 29, 2008 7:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Binge Vodka pals, Hillary and McCain propose Gasoline Tax holiday that would save even Billionaires a few dollars.
Bill Gates must be overjoyed that McHillaryCain wants to rescue him from such dire financial stress.
April 29, 2008 7:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
One problem fogu. Clinton knows the gas "holiday" only goes through without the oil companies being taxed to compensate. She's a phoney-baloney with this one. But what can you say about a woman who owns two mansions, only flies on a private jet (in fairness Obama now also has a charter but with her it's a way of life) and whose daughter works for one of the filthiest, richest hedge funds in the world, courtesy of her mmam and dad's contacts.
April 29, 2008 7:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Many aspire to be better off tomorrow than they are today. You got a problem with that?
Me, I just want to surf.
April 29, 2008 8:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary has jumped the shark.
April 29, 2008 8:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Clinton is the best choice if you want a Democrat in the White House.
Oh, did she switch parties? When did that happen?
April 29, 2008 8:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary's head on a chicken.
April 29, 2008 8:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's like a ointment on a cancerous skin growth.
Is Hillary Clinton an idiot, or is she just trying to dangle a tiny carrot in front of voters, under the assumption that they are idiots?
We need greater fuel efficiency. We need research into alternative fuels (not just corn). We need to get ourselves off the oil that fuels war, terrorism and global warming.
Making gas a little bit cheaper won't fix jack.
How many Clinton supporters are here pretending it's a great idea? Are they pretending to be idiots, or are they the real deal? It's been getting so difficult to tell.
April 29, 2008 8:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Quick calculation:
320,500,000 gallons of gas used per day (source: http://www.gravmag.com/oil.html)
x
120 days in summer
x
18 cents tax per gallon
=
$7 BILLION
Not exactly an insignificant amount of money to take from the oil companies and give back to the people.
April 29, 2008 8:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Except it would not come out of the the Oil Company revenues. Hillary is proposing to suspend the Federal Highway taxes that are added to each gallon of gas sold at the pump.
All Hillary is doing is playing a Shell game(Pun Intended) Since the Nations roads and bridges have to be funded, she will have to turn around and collect revenues later on from consumers to make up for the highway taxes that she suspended now.
April 29, 2008 8:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're wrong.
Listen to her ad (linked at the top). She is going to use oil companies profits to offset the loss in gas tax revenue.
April 29, 2008 8:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
But what is she going to do with those funds? The taxes as they are go directly to the infrastructure.
Are the increased 3 month taxes on energy companies (ridiculous) going to go to the infrastructure?
The twisted mess that is this slap dash plan clearly illustrates how it is not a serious plan and is mere pandering.
I doubt even Clinton considers this a serious plan that she'll ever enact.
April 29, 2008 9:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
If those funds go through the House and the Senate there is no way they are getting out intact. Everyones gonna want a piece of that pie.
Hillary's "plan" doesn't add up.
April 29, 2008 9:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
In the end, even if the Tax Gods smile down on us and the windfall tax goes through. The money we collect from the Oil Companies will be worth less than the revenues they recieved from raising gas prices. The indirect costs will be increased for collections and legal issues and in the end the discount rate (which isn't being very nice to us atm) will cut the revenues we recieve down by at least 2.4 percent. Probably is more now, but maybe the Fed will bring the prime rate down to 0 and maybe the Israelis and Arabs will suddenly have a huge lovefest in the middle of it all.
April 30, 2008 10:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Now I see why Hillary wins the less educated voters.
May 1, 2008 3:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
The gas tax holiday was a ridiculous idea when McCain proposed it, and it's no more intelligent now that Hillary has climbed on the band wagon.
It's not going to keep gas prices from rising. The era of cheap gas is over and the sooner we get used to it and start conserving gas the better. It will deprive the government of money that's desparately needed to sustain and rebuild our crumbling infrastructure. And, any savings is likely to be eaten up, especially if the losses the holiday causes are going to be offset by increased taxes on the oil industry. Who does Hillary think is ultimately going to pay those increased taxes?
The season of silly political pandering has begun. Kudos to Obama for having the balls not to support the gas tax holiday for the sake of political expediency.
April 29, 2008 8:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
OK, OK, I was going with my friend the teachers summer schedule.
Three months (90 days) is $5 BILLION back to the people.
Still a nice chunk of change and a recession stimulus.
April 29, 2008 8:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is not giving anything back to the people. Even with the Federal Highway tax suspended, gas will still be much more expensive at the pump than it was last summer. Some Stimulus package!. No wonder you love Hillary. She can baffle you with her Republican Trickle Down, Voodoo Economics, Fuzzy Math Bullshit.
April 29, 2008 8:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
So you prefer allow the oil companies to rape the public rather than giving some of the obscene profits back to average people. Is that also Obama's position?
Interesting POV.
April 29, 2008 8:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Fogu2
You really are a dimwit.
It would not come out of the the Oil Company revenues. Hillary is proposing to suspend the Federal Highway taxes that are added to each gallon of gas sold at the pump.
All Hillary is doing is playing a Shell game(Pun Intended) Since the Nations roads and bridges have to be funded, she will have to turn around and collect revenues later on from consumers to make up for the highway taxes that she suspended now.
April 29, 2008 8:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Straw man alert.
April 30, 2008 9:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's a dumb argument. You want to cut the profits of oil companies, replace your Tahoe with a Harley or as a last resort...a Prius. if your able, just buy a a mountain bike. Clinton is not proposing oil companies give us money. She's giving them a free pass, hell, they'll make money.
April 30, 2008 10:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Why not just return all taxes and fees to the people? We can shut down the US government and let free enterprise step up to fill the void. Businesses always do a better job of taking care of people than government. It's in a businesses best interest to be a >a href="http://www.thecorporation.com/">good citizen, right?
April 29, 2008 8:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
No Government programs have done as much for Americans as Enron has!
April 29, 2008 8:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
no
April 29, 2008 8:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama once again demonstrates his lack of political acumen, as we've already seen with the Wright fiasco.
His specious argument that if we give consumers a break on the price of gasoline, then nothing is going to be done to solve this problem long-term, is complete malarkey.
Millions of consumers across this country - including myself - would welcome ANY relief on the price of gas - even if it's only 20 cents a gallon. Obama's bogus contention that it's not going to help is typical of an out-of-touch political elitist who never has to pump a gallon of gas himself. And that's exactly how voters are going to interpret this.
April 29, 2008 8:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, it's just not going to help.
April 29, 2008 9:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Speak for yourself, limousine liberal
April 30, 2008 1:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
He's acting like a responsible administrator. Even with the windfall tax this results in a net loss for taxpayers.
April 30, 2008 10:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Dollar is becoming worthless because nothing is manufactured here anymore. That is why we have to import almost everything. We have nothing to sell in return. That is why we are running an every growing balance of trade, and then having to borrow that money from China to run up huge trade and budget deficits.
By the end of this year, America will be in an economic Depression similar to the Dust Bowl era, and we have no manufacturing base left to work ourselves out of it.
The dollar is becoming so devalued in exchange rates, that by this time next year, Gasoline will be at least $6.00 per gallon at the pump. Ask Hillary what she plans to do about that, instead of treating people like children with her highway tax suspension that she will have to collect from you later in one form or another.
April 29, 2008 9:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Now then let's REALLY talk about the economy, taxes, and energy policy.
April 29, 2008 9:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Breaking: Hillary proposes "Meat Stick Holiday" to ease financial burden on consumers of Slim Jims.
April 29, 2008 9:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Breaking: Hillary proposes trees that grow scratch lottery tickets instead of leaves.
April 29, 2008 9:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
We all know why she is going this route. Everyone who is apart of this blog, to some degree, follows politics and policy, and the effects they have. Hillary knows this is only minor treatment to a big symptom of middle and lower class America feeling their pocketbooks tight, and that it won't do a damn thing. She is appealing to the passions of the mass of mundane people who get their political news from her bullshit adds, and she knows it. Thats the game she's playing. Same with McCain. One year he is about decent politics, and now he is tying Obama to Hamas.
All people are going to see with this suspended gas tax, is "free money" and their gonna blow a load all over their pants. Its unfortunate that its going to play in her favor.
April 29, 2008 9:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
The guy just paid off his student loans... and he's an elitist? I wanna meet the elitist who had to take a loan out to pay for school, he prolly has some good stories.
April 29, 2008 9:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wages are stagnant. Too large a portion of those wages already goes to the high price of gas. Giving back eighteen cents per gallon is a token gesture. It will still leave the cost of gas too high and that doesn't just affect commuters. It affects the cost of everything that's delivered by truck.
This idea that we're going to get the money back from the oil companies that we're pulling out of our gas tax revenue is just wishful thinking. There's no connection between the two. And there's nothing that keeps the oil companies from jacking up their prices to recoup anything they may have lost to windfall profits taxes.
If you're so sold on the idea that windfall profits taxes will restore the lost revenue from the gas tax holiday, pass the windfall profits tax first. If you can get it to pass, THEN apply that revenue to the highway trust fund.
Bottom line: Hillary's blowing smoke up voters' butts. She thinks they're idiots and can be bought off so cheaply. It's obvious who's elitist and condescending.
April 29, 2008 9:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Breaking: Hillary proposes HEAD ON! Apply directly to the forehead. HEAD ON! Available at Walgreen's.
April 29, 2008 9:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Doesn't anybody realize that the "Federal Gasoline Tax" is imposed on refiners and importers basis their production and imports less exports of gasoline. What McCain and Clinton are saying is that refiners can stop sending checks to the Treasury for June, July and August. This is not like a state sales tax holiday where the tax is not added to your purchase and the retailer does not have to pay the state. The gasoline retailer does not know or care if the tax is in the price he pays.
Another TAX BREAK FOR THE OIL INDUSTRY.
I might think this proposal is cynical but I believe our politicians are too stupid for that.
April 29, 2008 9:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'd like a holiday from bullshit red-herring tactics, please.
April 29, 2008 10:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Breaking:
Hillary proposes temporary suspension of Federal Taxes on Band-Aids, to help gunshot victims.
April 29, 2008 10:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
For the record, two very recent blogs have a lot of information about gas prices and the oncoming energy crisis (disclaimer, I started the first one listed here):
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/04/i-am-very-disappointed-in-obam.php
and
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/04/gas-prices-us-vs-europe.php
Both had very lively discussions with a lot of information published -- and because the devil is all in the details, there were hardly any trolls about!
April 29, 2008 10:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
"So if she steals the nomination I'll feel no remorse at all for voting for Nader and rat-f*cking her and her obnoxious ass supporters into history's dustbin."
Posted by LeroyS
And you've recruited a lot of Clinton supporters to return the favor, Leroy.
Are you saving your other foot to shoot at a different time?
And "steals the nomination"? WTF? Did Barry reach 2025 when I wasn't looking?
April 30, 2008 12:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
If Hillary gets the nomination, it will be because she has stolen it. And if she steals it, she will lose, and she will deserve to lose.
But I agree--it doesn't do anyone any good to telegraph your moves as to how you'll vote if your candidate loses. I'm sure I've done it too, but it's not smart.
April 30, 2008 8:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
I really hope Obama's team hits back quickly with ads that show how loony Clinton's economic ideas are.
Considering how smart she is, I'm surprised that she would support such proposals. You know, I'm starting to get the impression that winning is more important to her than doing what she knows to be right...
April 30, 2008 6:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
I love the clinton fans trusting the oil companies so damn much. Yeah, we can trust the oil companies not to raise prices to balance out the money they lose after a windfall tax. What should I expect out of someone who trusted George Bush's nonsense in the build up to attacking iraq.
April 30, 2008 6:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
And how exactly will Hillary Clinton implement her gas tax "holiday" in time for this summer? Even if she joined forces with John McCain, there is no way that it would pass the legislative hurdles and might even inspire a Presidential veto.
This pandering proposal is exactly what the nation does not need - we need a real energy policy that will encourage research and production of renewable and cleaner sources of energy. We do not need an artificial and temporary price control measure during the period of peak demand. Hillary and McCain's hare brained idea will simply increase the profits for the oil companies by increasing demand further. That's insane economics and will ultimately hurt the very consumers paying the modest fixed rate tax. The fact is that this is just a bullshit distraction - because that's all she has got at this stage.
Hillary is revealing herself as the most power hungry and craven politician in a generation. She has the real potential to exceed Nixon in her deviousness. We have had ample warning to beware of letting Clinton back into the executive branch.
April 30, 2008 7:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
The reason the Bush administration has worked so hard to drive the price of oil up is BECAUSE they want to revive the ANWR argument. Republicans are determined to defeat the environmentalists on this issue. What Hillary and McCain are proposing would drive up demand for oil and make the situation worse. The ONLY environmentally responsible position is the one Obama is taking.
April 30, 2008 8:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
McCain....Clinton....can someone remind me again which one is supposed to be the Democrat?
April 30, 2008 8:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's as if Hillary is running for Class President and is telling students that she'll put in a coke machine in the lunchroom if they elect her.
April 30, 2008 8:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Who does that remind you of...a president whose only goal is to "take action...now!"? Regardless of whether action is a good idea or consequences of the "action" are predicted and planned for, right? Sound like someone we all know? Hey, it served GWB well enough to get reelected, long after the disastrous results of his "action" had started piling up all over the place...so maybe HRC knows what she's doing.
May 2, 2008 5:08 PM | Reply | Permalink