« Hillary Raises $2.5 Million Since Victory Was Declared Tonight | Home | The Latest Delegate And Popular Vote Breakdowns Out Of Pennsylvania »

Hillary Raises $2.5 Million Since Victory Was Declared Tonight

So emails Hillary spokesperson Phil Singer:

As of 11:30PM tonight, we are at nearly $2.5 million since PA was called for HRC -- 80% of that money is coming from new donors to the campaign. It's our best night ever.



Comments (99)

avatar

So, what is Penn's share?

Good. $2.5 million more, and she can pay herself back.

Another 2.5 million and she could pay Penn or her loan.

avatar

....I mean good for her but are these people good at math? Do they know sumpin the rest of us don't? Maybe they're aware of her burgeoning campaign debt and wanna do their part in retiring it?

Well, good for her. As I have been saying for some weeks now, she is a good, strong candidate. Tonight's fundraising numbers as simply one more datum to support that contention.

Of course, this is precisely why the "he cannot close the deal" line is such patent nonsense. It is not that he is too weak to win; rather it is that she is too strong to lose. They are both strong candidates, which is why neither has quite been able to eliminate the other.

I need to read more positive comments like that.

Greg,

You're too nice. You're like a Disney character without the fur.

:-)

avatar

Does this mean she will begin paying the small vendors that she has left in the lurch?

I would ask all Obama supporters to donate tonight. It is time to show her all her negativity is wrong and sad. Did you read the NY Times editorial yet, coming out tomorrow? They supported her, and now they are dismayed at the low road she has taken. I cannot stand her, and I respected her quite a bit two months ago.

avatar

yawn.

wake my for her concession speech, if she is dignified enough to give one.

I am so happy that hillary clinton won by 10 points... Zogby & Suffolk polling companies called it.... good job.

Obama only won 7 counties.... Clinton won more counties, won 10 points more than obama and will likely end up with my delegates from this state.

She raised lots of money since winning pennsylvania....

I see big wins heading her way as the campaign goes foward....

GO HILLARY!!!!!!!!!

avatar

New York Times celebrates her as well!

She won by 8.6%, which you'd know if you waited for "every vote to be counted".

She's down and out. Give it time...it will sink in.

Except she didn't win by 10%. Like the fake math used to claim she raised gobs of money... she only won PA 8.6% (from the Pennsylvania Secretary of State website).

One of these days the Clinton supporters here at TPM will get close to reality.

That's weird, wapo.com has different numbers than PA's Sec. of State site. Looks like wapo's number are more recent since the vote total are higher than the other site, they're calling it 10%.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/

Hillary Clinton 1,258,245 55%
Barack Obama 1,042,297 45%
Key: Red Checkmark Winner
Precincts: 99% | Updated: 3:29 AM ET | Source: AP

Looks like a double-digit win for Hillary to me.

Obama should drop out now and save the party from anymore of his divisiveness.

Hillary 08!

Because the Washington Post is responsible for tabulating election results in the state of Pennsylvania?

54.3% - 45.8% = 8.5%

That's with 9,177 out of 9,263 Districts reporting, per the Secretary of State's results.

avatar

Well I just gave Hillary another 50 bucks.
I guess a lot of people had the same idea.
Of course Money can't buy you love, just ask Oilbama. Great Victory tonight. I guess I will go have a cigar and ponder the decision by Puerto Rican Gov. Anibal Acevedo Vila last month to endorse Sen. Barack Obama. Obama-ites were all happy at the time and it certainly seemed like good news for Oilbama as Puerto Rico represents one of the last contests in the primary process, and Acevedo Vila is one of the territory's seven superdelegates. But I will chuckle while smoking
because of the indictment of Acevedo Vila on charges including conspiracy, false statements, wire fraud, federal program fraud and tax crimes.
The guy turns out to be a bigger scumbag than Oilbama's best buddy Rezco.
Hillary will win the popular vote easily as I have said all along, and Puerto Rico will be the key. With neither candidate winning enough delagates the supers will side with the popular vote winner, as they should in a Democracy.
Hillary is the Winner. Loser Oilbama is toast. I know all of Dick Cheney's Oil buddies will be bummed but I am OK with it.


Hey, since you like throwing away money, how about for a worthy cause, maybe the Red Cross or something useful.

avatar

Or donations towards Irans' just-in-case nuclear radiation suits...in the event of a US ICBM hit, unless they are completely Obliterated! Go HELLary!

avatar

Are you a FreeRepublic or Dittohead troll by any chance, because you sure sound like one. If you can't even bring yourself to spell the name of the candidates correctly, then why both posting anything at all?

avatar

If she is ever to have a hope of persuading these most loyal of Democrats to come back to her side, let alone win over the larger body of voters, she has to call off the dogs.

No chance of that. Sadly, the Clintons are going to wake up with fleas.
~

avatar

Good for her

2.5 tonight, and another 2.5 from Elton John, and she can do the correct thing and start paying her debt.

If I remember it right, she owns about 5 big ones to herself, 4.5 to Penn, 6 to others.

Clinton's Pennsylvania win doesn't begin to explain the $2.5 million her campaign has (allegedly) raised.

No, it was her boast to toast Iran. To incinerate every living thing that flies, walks, or crawls in that country, in the event their political leadership dare defy We The People. Especially the children. Nits into lice, and all that.

After all, who do those people think they are? God?

avatar

"to explain the $2.5 million her campaign has (allegedly) raised."

GOOD QUESTION!

At $250 per person, this is 8000 NEW FOLKS IN 3 to 4 HOURS; this is a bit of a push!!!!! Possible but Team Clinton has pushed the envelope too often....
If it is so, not much power to her!

avatar

Might want to check that math.

2500000/250 = 10000

You know, I think you just might be right.

I donated a gigantic dump in her honor about 10 minutes ago. FLUSH!

avatar

Expect lots more in the weeks to come! She didn't just win, she knocked him out!

8.6% win in a state she was expected to win by healthy double-digits (15-29%) and where she only picked up a net 10 delegates "knocked him out"...?

So if she keeps netting delegates at this rate (which won't happen because she will lose in NC) by the time of the convention she will only be behind by 60 delegates

avatar

$11 million to $4 million. Expectations within the Obama camp (and from Obama supporters) that Obama might even win, but that it would be a close, low-single-digits race.

Yes, given the bar set and the obstacles faced, a 10 pt win is a knockout. Few truly expected it.

Comical. She only won 8.6%, so stop with your fictional 10% and she failed to pick up any significant number of delegates (she picked up a net 10) and still trails Obama by more than 153 pledged delegates and trails by 130 total delegates after tonight. Obama will net more delegates in NC than HRC did tonight.

HAHAHAHAHA!

Dude, seriously. You need to warn people. You just made latte come out of my nose!

Will somebody please wake up Al Gore and get him into the race?

do you really think a guy did not run a contest this season can just walk in and declare he's the nominee just because ?

avatar

Will somebody please wake up Al Gore and get him into the race?

Posted by eatbees
April 23, 2008 12:50 AM | Reply | Permalink

I wish. But put yourself in Al Gore's shoes, and watch the media circus tear at which ever Democrat appears to have the best chance.

Would you really want to go through that crap again? We are going to keep getting a government that cares about the tycoon class only...until we can break the tycoon class' monopoly on the MSM. Which is only getting worse.
~

She entered April $10M in the hole.

Obama forced her to probably spend another $15M.

I think she's now $15-20M in the hole.

I'd like to know how much of this "$2.5M is for the Primary and what is for the GE."

avatar

i may be wrong but clinton camp. did not include the funds from elton johns fund raiser in last fec report ..it was 2.5 million any guesses where their new found funds came from????

Nice catch! You're probably right.

Bingo.

avatar

Wasn't that Elton John fundraiser in early April? It will be included in the next filing, not the March filing.

avatar

which means Obama must have raised 5 or 10

Single digit win folks....wait till the votes are counted Josh Marshall before posting the dreaded "double-digit" on your front page.

Repeat after me: Single Digit Win.

Obama still didn't close the deal after outspending her 3 to 1... a win's a win, remember?

Off topic, but think for a sec that over 200000 Republicans took the time to go the polls and vote against McCain. I know those folks aren't going to vote for either Hillary or Obama, but I bet a good sized chunk of them sits out the GE.

avatar

Whoop-dee-doo. She'll burn through that by next Tuesday. What cracks me up is how old hacks like Lanny Davis claim that Hillary is some sort of underdog when she enjoys massive advantages when it comes to name support and institutional support and how Obama can't win when he's won more votes than anybody in the history of the primary process. If the question of "closing the deal" is to be raised, surely it should come with regards to Clinton and why she is even in a fight with an African American senator with a funny name, when she enjoys the benefits of the most powerful name and machine in the Democratic party in the past 20 years.

I just took a look at my finances yesterday, I'll donate $80 tomorrow. Why $80? Because I already donated about $110.09 and you don't need to send information for donors under $200.

avatar

possibleFEC Report: Hillary Clinton (April Monthly 2008)
April 21, 2008
On April 20, 2008, Hillary Clinton’s campaign filed its April Monthly FEC Report. This report covers the period of Mar. 1 - 31, 2008. Here’s the breakdown:

Total Raised In March: $20,931,870.78
Money Spent In March: $22,372,765.27
Cash On Hand At End Of March: $31,712,197.67
—> For Primary: Approx $9,000,000
—> For General Election: Approx $22,000,000
Debts: $10,321,562.87

*It’s worth noting that this report does not include the $2.5 million that Sen. Clinton raised at the recently held fundraiser with Elton John.

answer to that question

avatar

This was orchestrated to happen, to make it look like Pennsylvania was some kind of watershed moment. And to get sound bites from willing media marks such as TPM.

Those willing to trudge through the muck of the Hill Hags site knew as much even yesterday.

muck? I think you mean comedy gold. I'm sure I'm not the only one that watches the daily train wreck over at the big pink.

Thanks for the post. It's important to support causes I believe in. I will donate to Obama immediately.

avatar

Jbentley4:
I had to go create a profile for the express purpose of telling you how good your comment was. You've just expressed, in a nutshell, the essence of the media's treatment of Obama. I hope once he's president they start following his example and get a little more sensible.

avatar

I just contributed to Clinton for the first time.

Bottom line is Obama has more money than he can effectively spend. He's peaked. He's overexposed. He cannot buy this nomination. His numbers will go down from here on out.

Clinton has plenty of headroom to increase her support. She has not peaked and is showing momentum. She needs the cash to achieve effective promotion. Her numbers will go up from here on out.

As we round the last turn Obama the Gelding is showing that he used everything he's got and cannot shake Clinton. She show signs of second wind and is about to overtake Obama the Gelding at the finish.

Clinton must be the nominee for the sake of the party and the nation.

avatar

Why are you trying to shut the nomination down before millions of people have voted in Oregon, Indiana and North Carolina?

You are right... after netting a whopping 10 delegates tonight, she is down by only 153 delegates.

(wry grin)

Silly Vampire = Did you forget the Super Delegates?

Nope, they've been breaking for Obama:
Obama Clinton
215 250 3/28/08
217 251 3/29/08
218 251 3/31/08
220 251 4/02/08
221 251 4/03/08
222 251 4/07/08
224 252 4/08/08
225 252 4/09/08
226 252 4/10/08
226 254 4/11/08
227 255 4/14/08
227 256 4/15/08
228 256 4/16/08
231 256 4/17/08
233 256 4/18/08
233 257 4/19/08
234 258 4/21/08

Did he get the 2025 already? I hadn't heard that yet. Doesn't she still have more SDs than he does?

258 C
234 O

The fact that he's holding these SDs in his back pocket to release publicly every time he needs to change the discourse, looks like old-fashioned Washington politics to me. I thought he was a "change-agent" maybe he means loose change agent?

He really should get out of the race for the good of the party. Sad really to watch him spend all your hard-earned money just to lose in the end.

Bottom line is Obama has more money than he can effectively spend.

How lucky for Hillary that she does NOT have this problem!

avatar

Well the worst is over, we survived Hillary's fantasyland speech. What is this popular vote her camp is selling? There is no popular vote, because the caucus states would be severely diminished in a popular vote. But you never hear the media talk about that small fact. Maybe now the MSM will get around to discussing Hillary threatening to obliterate a race of people off the earth...to help her win an election. I didn't think it was possible, but she actually found a way to make Bush/Cheney and Rove look moderate. That's change to vote for!

avatar

Too bad her campaign couldn't win by 10% tonight though... only 8.6%, which Josh referred to as the "dividing line" on expectations.

http://www.electionreturns.state.pa.us/

The media is having a serious problem with rounding up / down with the numbers tonight.

As for Obama campaign expectations, it's worth pointing out that they predicted a loss in Pennsylvania a long time ago, and their loss tonight was only moderately higher than they predicted.

http://www.ilikesalt.com/files/obamacampaignexcel.xls

I call bullshit.

avatar

The Popular Vote totals counting all voters who voted, FLA and MICH.
Clinton -15,013,813
Obama -14,900,543

It is time for Obama to concede.
Why is he staying in the race? He has no chance of winning enough delagates for the 2025 needed to clinch and he is hurting Hillary's chances against McCain the longer he stays in this.
His incessant whining along with his whiny supporters is pathetic.


You can parse these numbers all you want, but there's no way (other than in Hillary and her supporters' delusional minds) that Florida and especially Michigan get added into the popular vote totals (especially when your own candidate said that Michigan didn't count). It's a ridiculous argument - do you honestly think the superdelegates are stupid enough to fall for this line of reasoning? And you know what? We don't pick a Dem nominee on popular vote - sorry to be the bearer of bad news. We select a nominee on delegates, which is exactly how Obama has been running his campaign. Maybe someone should have told him that his opponent was going to try and change the rules in the middle of the campaign, because that's what she's trying to do. Sad, really...

There are the rules, which are mere contrivances, and there is REALITY. The REALITY is that Michigan and Florida will count in the general, and the preferences of the voters in those states will matter then, won't they? Or is that a delusion on my part?

Hillary HAS won CA, NY, OH, PA, TX and would have won FLA and MI, big states that the Democrats do want to win in the general. Or am I again being delusional?

Obama's delegates have come from caucus states where the Moveon storm-troopers took over the proceedings, and from many states which will go winner-take-all to the GOP in the fall. The fact that Obama trounced Hillary in those states won't count for diddly in the general.

It seems to me like there is at least some substance to the argument that Hillary, in spite of the GOP hatred she inspires, would still stand a better chance than Obama in the general. Bear in mind that after the GOP gets through with Obama, he may be as much an object of GOP scorn as Gore, Kerry, Dukakis, Carter, Bill Clinton or even Hillary herself.

First of all, don't be so smug and sure about Michigan - Obama would very likely have won that state given its close proximity to Illinois and the demographic breakdown.

Secondly, I absolutely cannot abide the argument that Hillary won "all the big states" - as if every vote cast for Hillary in the primary would turn into a vote for McCain in the general. Don't you realize how ridiculous that argument is? Do you honestly, in your heart of hearts, believe that California will be red this year? You cannot extrapolate primary results as an indicator of how well a candidate will do in the general - it's comparing apples to oranges. There were almost 2.3M votes casts in the Democratic primary last night - do you truly believe that all 1.2 million votes that Hillary got are going to go to McCain in November? If you do then we are in sad, sad shape.

There are record turnouts in the Democratic primaries this year, and if you don't think the great majority of those people will vote for Obama in November then I think you're being willfully ignorant. I think that, more possible, is that many of those new people that Obama is bringing into the party won't show up in November if Clinton is the nominee. We'll see...

Yet you extrapolate Obama's primary support to the general? Oh well, go ahead.

Anyway, one point to remember is that the general is not based on a national total popular vote. The red states are still going to go GOP, most of them winner-take-all. The Democrats need to win big swing states. Will Obama or Hillary have a better chance of winning those states against McCain? For example, Ohio.

I'm not saying it's a 100% lock that Hillary would fare better in the general, but it doesn't exactly seem like an open-and-shut case that Obama would do better, either.

avatar

Obama won Texas. Even in popular vote. Since you had to vote in the primary in order to caucus, my vote (and other caucus goers' votes) counted twice. Don't like that? Then quit with the bogus popular vote argument, unless you want to include caucus participants.

No, those totals do NOT include the voters of Iowa, Nevada, Maine and Washington - caucus states which do not release popular vote totals.

That also doesn't count all those Michigan voters who choose uncommitted because your girl was the only major name on the ballot.

Fortunately, we do have ways of fairly representing the will of voters, even in states that don't have a popular vote total! They're called pledged delegates.

Yep, I just gave ANOTHER $100.

Since Obama can't close the deal, even with his overwhelming spending and adoring Obama Cult, don't you all think its time to ask him to concede for the good of the party?

Matthew
http://www.TheIndependentView.com

Yes it is. After her staggering 20% [+/- 11.5%] rout of Obama as predicted by you and gotalife and much more than net $3.5M in the bank vs. a competing balance that I'm quite certain could not be (as it might otherwise appear) ten times greater...

Yep, she's certainly wrapped this race up. After all, she leads in pledged delegates now, doesn't she. I mean, doesn't PA award over 1890 pledged delegates all by itself, giving her the much-needed +160 with an 8.5% margin of victory in a proportionate contest? No? Well shucks!

I'll tell ya what. If she wins the pledged delegate count and the popular vote count, even with Florida, not Michigan though can't go that far, and she will have earned the nomination. If she can't seal the deal why should she get the nomination? North Carolina, Oregon, Indiana, MT, SD, Kentucky, and WV to go. We'll be watchin'. Better send more than $100 Weaver, she's gonna need it.

avatar

Close the deal? So you just say whatever people tell you to say, don't you?

This was Hillary's race to win, moron. It was her deal to close all along.

Go protest Vodka, that's more up you're alley.

(For anyone following along, Weaver wants to boycott Absolute Vodka for an "anti-american" ad. Idiotic.)

Well let it.

I'm sure Absolut will be shattered to find out. [rolls eyes]

avatar

The Pennsylvania Dem primary results on the TPM front page are inaccurate and misleading, implying that with 99% of the vote counted, Clinton won by 55% to 45% Obama.

The Pennsylvania Election Returns site lists these figures (99.07% vote count):
http://www.electionreturns.state.pa.us/

Clinton: 54.3%
Obama: 45.8%

That’s a vote spread of only 8.5%, not even close to 10%.

avatar

well, I finally watched the phil.i.am Obama video. But I didn't come in my pants. Nothin'. Nada. Zilch. Not even a stirring of an erection
: (

avatar

not even a little squirt : (

no here would be interested in what's happening in your pants, so Pleeease keep that for yourself.

Thanks for sharing, really, but I'm with sashimi - please keep it to yourself. Could you imagine what a Hillary supporter would say if an Obama supporter said this? He'd immediately be labeled sexist.

avatar

annnddd she is still in the hole

if that isn't just total propaganda to try to build confidence in supporters

avatar

Look. This isn’t the Rumble in the Jungle. It’s not World War II. It’s not even Tom & Jerry. It’s more like Wrestlemania. A little bit of fireworks and a laser display. But it is really just make-believe. A show. A show that happens every few years. Lots of noise and lots of action. But fundamentally still just a show. Nobody gets hurt. Yes, I am talking about the US Presidential election. http://angryafrican.net/2008/04/22/storm-in-a-teacup/

Another $25 to the Obama fund.

I am enormously frustrated!

I want to believe in the party strategy to bring this race to all the states and pull more voters into the Democratic Party. This would be great for the nominee in the general.

But,
this contest is doing as much damage to the party as it is doing good. The PARTY is responsible for collating members around the nominee, and that nominee was decided more than a month ago. Instead, they have adopted a strategy that is splitting the party.

What Hillary is doing is bizarre - on the one hand she is doing Obama a favor by putting these crazy issues out there before the general, but I can't help see her gaming this strategy to no positive end for the Democrats. BIZARRE. Now, she has partnered with scaife, the very same opinion-maker who hounded her and Bill in the 90's with scum, to scum Obama. To what positive end?

avatar

Well, it's 8:30 am in PA, and the PA Secretary of State still shows that with 99% reporting, it's Obama at 45.8% to Clinton's 54.3%...that's 8.5%, not a double-digit win unless you count the number after the decimal...and unless she won the final 1% by some outrageous margin, you can't expect that spread to change by more than a tenth of a percent or so....

...in other words, what the Clinton camp and media are spinning as some great Clinton victory was the fact that she only lost 60% of her lead there. Never mind that anything less than 26% would make it impossible for her to win on pledged delegate totals...now they've moved on to "what would Hillary have to win to win the popular vote totals?" Again, never mind that focusing in on that disregards those "insignificant" states which held caucuses. No, never mind any of that...instead, keep your eye on those goalposts the Clinton campaign has mounted on that flatbed truck, so they can more easily be moved week after week after week...

This is so over and has been for a month. I'm done even thinking about it and I damn sure won't be watching any "news" until Hillary announces she's dropping out. This is just absurd, and paying attention is enabling her. It's like the guy in the insane asylum who believes he's Napolean and everyone just indulges him by calling him General.

Jenn, I feel your pain. She should have been out a long time ago - any other candidate would have either been forced out by the party or had the good sense (and grace) to concede and rally behind the front runner for the good of the party. Even Mitt Romney (who had just as much a chance of winning as Hillary does now) knew what he needed to do for the good of the party. Clinton only does what's good for Clinton.

The media is complicit in this, Jenn. They are keeping this alive for their own amusement.

Which in the end is not doing Hillary any favors cause she can't win.

This changed exactly nothing.

Tena, you're so right - I could see Tweety, David Gregory (who has become disgusting) and Pat Buchanan (why he's still on MSNBC after his abhorrent screed about black people is beyond me) absolutely salivating over the prospect of keeping this thing going. It's an absolute disgrace. Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow were trying to keep the discussions grounded (somewhat), and Chuck Todd was doing his best to convey the near-impossibility of Hillary winning on delegate count, but the rest of them were getting erections over the thought of this thing dragging out. And I heard that it was worse on CNN. I'm absolutely disgusted by what passes for "news" these days - to be honest, I'd rather get my news from blogs, The Daily Show and the Colbert Report - those guys run rings around anyone else (and at least I get to laugh at the ridiculousness of it all!) ;)

I have to say that I love the absolute hypocrisy of Clinton supporters, who are now calling for Obama to concede even though he is still way ahead in delegate count and popular vote (as if popular vote means anything, anyway). There are a number of primaries left; namely,

May 3: Guam
May 6: Indiana and North Carolina
May 13: West Virginia
May 20: Kentucky and Oregon
June 1: Puerto Rico
June 3: Montana and South Dakota

Aren't you concerned about every voter having his or her say anymore, the way you were before Pennsylvania? Now that she's pulled Pennsylvania out with an 8.5% victory (and will net probably between 8 and 10 delegates), you suddenly want to shut this thing down and disenfranchise the people in the remaining 9 primaries? Do you even read what you write? Hillary supporters have no credibility because they have no consistency - their whines and complaints change daily (sometimes hourly) without any thought to how ridiculous they sound. If it wasn't so sad it would be truly comical.

OMG! Are you so blind to your own hypocrisy?!! And have you no sense of irony? Here's the secret everyone but you must know by now: we are mimicking you Obamabots who have been calling for Hillary to get out for months now. Ex: see your own post to Jenn above!

There is and has been no rational reason for either of them to quit. Play the game to the end and whoever wins, wins fairly. That's how it needs to be done. In fact, the suggestion from the Obamaphiles that she quit is outrageous considering how very close this is.

If you're a DEM with principles, you have to look at the popular vote - including FL. MI too as far as I'm concerned. No one forced Obama to take his name off the ballot in MI, that wasn't in the "rules." And his (and Edwards') supporters in MI were the one who voted uncomitted. They tried to screw with the system and they lost, fair and square.

BTW, what were the popular vote totals for caucus states like WA?

avatar

yeah, I'll believe that when I see it. Shrilliary has proven time and time again that she lies about her money.

And I just dropped another contribution right in Obama's hands this morning. First thing I did.

In two more weeks, I'll hit him again with another $250.

And I'm gonna keep right on.

Donating to Clinton is like throwing money out the window. Do these donors read the numbers?; it's impossible for her to win this nomination.

Hmm, I was playing with the Slate delegate calculator and it said that even if he won NC by 10 (half of what he's polling at right now), he'd net 11 delegates over her (23 delegates if he wins by 20). So this "dent" in his lead could get popped back pretty quick. To say nothing of the superdelegate endorsements he was promising between then and now.

I hope she's going to pay off some bills with that money cause they are sure trumpeting this and since they owe money everywhere, this is a perfect reason for creditors to start filing against the campaign.

They really ought to keep their mouths shut - but what am I saying? This is The Restoration - they are running on shooting off their mouths.

Someone on the thread above posted this Google spreadsheet which shows that Hillary needs over 85% of the remaining delegates (and supers) to overtake Obama and win the nomination:

http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=prPmm9XFdTjgHCLlXR8maHw

Come on, now - does anyone in their right mind think she has a snowball's chance in hell to do this???? It's so over, and the party and the supers have to put an end to this idiocy.

Clinton supporters apparently really want to pay off Mark Penn's bar tab.

And for those who whine about Obama outspending Clinton in Pennsylvania, it was great strategy. He knew he wasn't likely to win, but he went into the month flush with cash, and she was in the red. He forced her to spend a lot of money she didn't have. He's thinking about the long game, while she's scrambling.

Obama makes good use of my money. I gave a little last week and will probably give again next week. My boyfriend gave Obama another $100 after the speech last night.

A fool and his money are soon parted.

Who would pay to support this dying campaign?

avatar

This $2.5M is wonderful but that other campaign have gotten about 9,000+ new contributers per day on average since the ABC debates, DO THE NUMBERS. Thank you ABC!

avatar

Face it, a win for her is IMPOSSIBLE, period: