Obama is at 1.407 Million ATM, but hey she can use that money to pay off her debts then drop out.

Also very good for Mark Penn's bank account.

I hope that ten million will go to pay off their debt and pay back those small businesses.

Thanks for helping me pay off my second home on the Chesapeake and the winter lodge in Vail.

- Mark Penn

propaganda...i'm skeptical, they just want to reassure donors and add to their BS "comeback" argument.

Ah, since when do we start believing anything Team Clinton ever says. Their willingness to lie is well documented.

Ignore and Full Steam Ahead!

Let's see, Obama needs 3x funding advantage to lose by around 10%. What amount would it have taken to actually win?!

Yes, too bad she has less money. Imagine if she had same amount? Would Obama have lost by 25-35%? I gave Clinton $100 last night. Money well spent.

Matthew
http://www.TheIndependentView.com

They're lying. Just like they been lying every step of the way when it comes to fund raising numbers.

When the numbers come out weeks from now for this period, no one is going to remember, let alone be able to prove they did raise this but that's what they're counting on.

This is all for the benefit of Super delegates.

But don't expect the open primaries of Indiana and North Carolina to behave like Pennsylvania's geriatrics. Both states are younger, especially North Carolina, and independents can vote in each primary. (North Carolina is where a lot of the young people who fled Pennsylvania winters and job losses ended up).

Over the next two weeks, we'll be treated to much hoopla about how the Democratic race is once again up for grabs. Then, on May 5, Hillary's hopes will be dashed once more.

And then? After the votes are counted in all the primaries, look for the Gang of Four - Al Gore, Nancy Pelosi, Howard Dean and John Edwards - to join together and issue a challenge to the superdelegates: Make up your minds.

http://www.nypost.com/seven/04232008/postopinion/opedcolumnists/too_little__too_late_107751.htm

Barack Obama did exactly what he wanted to do in Pennsylvania.... he made Shrilliary Clintjoke spend millions to defend a state that she had in the bad.

Way to go!

Hillary has 10 million in debt. Do you think she uses her money to pay those creditors? Hardly. They'll get paid last... if at all.

I loved seeing MSNBC announce today that the race for delegates is over, and Barack Obama has official won the race for most delegates.

I am sure the supers are paying attention.

15% of Pennsylvanians think Obama is a muslim (wrong)

8% of Pennsylvanians admit they would never vote for a black man (racist)

I think that explains the 8.5% margin.

Obama will more than make up for that in November with indepedents and moderate republicans.

Go Obama! Yes We Can! Yes We Have! Yes We Will!

Invest in Hillary's Future.... as Governor of New York.

Invest in Obama!

Ok for the last F*cking time. Michigan and Florida do NOT count as they broke the rules.

All candidates agreed to that.

of course I wouldn't expect Shrilliary Clintjoke and her husband Billdo Clintjoke to stay true to their word.

What do they know about credibility?

One can't remember Bosnia and the other ruined the democratic party with a dna stain on a blue dress.

Ohhhhh Classy couple there!

Actually, she's behind by half a million.

Are back to MI and FL?

Holy Jumping Jackrabbit Jesus!

Are y'all going still be saying this the day Obama cleans off his shoe, pops his collar, and takes the oath of office?

I believe you will.

I'm afraid I'm joining the ever growing chorus of those who once defended the Clintons, who now wish they would just go away. My father and I had so many arguments over the years. If I had a dollar for every time I heard "How can you defend those people? They lie every time they open their mouths, and don't care who they ruin as long as it benefits them?"

If these superdelegates had any balls at all, they would end this before the Clintons completely destroy any hope for our party in November. That's if there's any party left.

For anyone interested:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html

And they don't include numbers for the TX caucus (as they should, since it was a separate and distinct event)

Former Edwards National General Chairman and 49 Other Edwards Supporters Throw Support to Barack Obama....

Keep throwing that money into the fire, Weaver.

Really, $10M from 50K new contributers in 24 hours(maybe)?

Obama got 75K +/- new contributers since the ABC debates. So at this rate will Clinton save the banking system of U.S.A. and Europe in a week or maybe two weeks?

Clinton is absolutely leading in something, it is just a bit unclear!

What Josh's latest video-thing and the TPM site in general fails to mention is that with Penn over, there is no way now for Clinton to catch Obamas lead. That's why she needed to win big, was to catch Obama.

That's the facts.

specious arguments about the popular vote are, oh, specious arguments. It leaves out the states that caucus, for some weird reason they add MI and FL (though those states do not count by their own actions).

This thing is over.

If Hillary was to tarnish Obama so bad that the super delegates overturned the election, that would be the end of democratic party for me, and I bet many others.

At this point she is only harming the party, and I bet, her own career, and her husbands legacy.

We have major problems that need solutions.

The price of gas and food is causing riots.

Two wars, middle class in ruins, trade deficits, lost jobs , it goes on and on.

Do you really want a rookie politician with no experience to hope these problems away?

Lets get real, we need a fighter like Clinton, a larger Dem rubber stamp Congress to shove change down their throat.

They will have to fight for it because the gop will not change and will vote together to stop change.

I'm sure no one appreciates those donations to Hillary more than John McCain because it will allow her to continue to his job for him without costing him a dime.

Amazing that Hillary supporters continue to delude themselves into thinking that she can win the nomination. Sorry, but there is no chance that the Superdelegates will overturn a 100 plus delegate advantage for Obama, because they know it will destroy the party.

Sorry, it's over. Anyone continuing to support Hillary at this point should be honest and admit what the ramifications are of continuing to bloody Obama. Maybe they like the way things are going in the country.

More pathetic spin from the Clinton campaign. The goal is to make people believe that she's got momentum going into her losses in Indiana and North Carolina.

All of this popular vote talk is for the money donating masses. This argument is not going to fly with Super-Delegates.

She needs monster money right now, and is going to lie to anybody in order to get it.

She probably loaned herself some more money so they could really float this number. Again she's trying to make news so she gets free coverage. Anybody donating money is likely pretty politically saavy, meaning they knew she was supposed to win Pennsylvania, and the fact that it was by 10 points means it was basically a tie.

If Hillary was smart she should forget NC and go hard in Indiana. Even if she loses NC by big numbers she can push her Indiana win. If she loses both Indiana and NC, it will be catastrophic for her.

Otto:
Please find in the DNC rules where the popular vote is mentioned as a deciding factor for the Democratic nomination.
While you are there, please find me any reference to "electoral votes".
Thanks

Now she drive her campaign even further into debt.

I donated my share at www.hillaryclinton.com

I for one don't believe that MacAuliffe is telling the truth. I'll believe that number when I see it.

Clinton lost last night because without that 20 point victory, and delegate booth, she now has no way to win the nomination. There are no states left for her to win. It is losses for Clinton here on out, and even if she does slide a victory out of one state that is left, she can't catch Obama's lead, because, indeed, it was Clinton that failed to close the deal last night. She had the lead she needed in the beginning. That 20 point lead. All she had to do was hold on to it. She didn't. She won, but she lost the nomination. Too bad. So Sad. See you later -except wait! No! She continues to put herself adn her delusions above the party.

Uh, she hasn't raised $10 million.

Terry Mac says she's "on track" to raise $10 million by the end of the day.

And we all know Terry Mac wouldn't lie or spin, don't we.

9.2 rounds to 9 not 10. It's not spin.

.4 and below rounds down; .5 and above rounds up. It's simple math. Although I know Hillary is not the biggest fan of math these days.

Such numbers won't really shift the underlying financial dynamic of the race, as Obama had over $40 million in cash on hand at the beginning of this month, while the Hillary camp was in the red. Still, such numbers are good for morale, something Hillaryland was in sore need of heading into yesterday.

I hope that all of my fellow Obama supporters who have been ragging Mr Sargent about his pro-Clinton bias read that paragraph. Please tell me how that reflects a pro-Clinton spin.

Lies and the lying liars who tell them.
I believe that when I see the proof. They are pathological.

Senator Obama can raise tens of millions of dollars from his huge group of loyal supporters, with one burst of emailing. Hillary can never ever match this power of his purse! Her negative campaigning and smart ass remarks like: "Why can't he close the deal." Well, he can and will close the DEAL. Team Billary will soon be packing their tent and heading back to New York. Buba Boy can hang out in Harlem where he loves it, and Hillary can learn to bake cookies!

That money is from the big donors who were waiting on the sidelines to give her money. She will never make more money than Obama. He has 1.4 million donors. All last night after he lose, we had new donors plus the recurring donors donating at rapid paces. Obama supporters donate to Barack on principal.

Bragging about the money raised might not be a good thing. I assume they think it will encourage fellow supporters to donate, however it could also have the opposite effect of "She's getting a lot of donations, I don't need to donate". I mean $50-$100 bucks is more valuable to me than it would be to somebody who made $10M over night. It could also have the effect of raising a good chunk of money for Obama.

It's all an attempt to get free news coverage. I think this is the reason why Obama didn't want to debate her anymore - the debates are 2 hours of free air time for her, and then 2-3 days of free coverage. He's made this campaign about money now- that's the only way he can get her out without alienating her supporters that he'll need come the GE.

The ridiculous thing is is that Clinton would likely be in the same place if she didn't go negative, as I don't think it really helped her campaign any in that the amount she convinced to vote her way was probably off-set by then number of voters she turned off. And in the process of going negative she basically killed any chance she had of possibly getting the VP ticket. I mean in a race so tightly contested, it would make perfect sense to join forces, however it is impossible to do so now.

Shhhhhhhhh,........hear that.....that's the tide turning. hahahahahahahahahahahahah seeya in NC.

brb...gotta help the Queen count her loot.

It'll be a HUGE challenge for Obama to counter this.

"Um. I wasn't on the ballot in Michigan."

Only a moron would count those votes. Sorry, Otto game over!

Just sent another $25 to Obama.

No matter how you try to spin or justify it, the Clintons are continuing to DIVIDE the Democratic Party so that it will be easier for John McCain to CONQUER it. The Clintons are executing a winning strategy for Republicans as if they were taking marching orders directly from Karl Rove. Hillary Clinton can't get more electorate votes or delegate votes than Barrack Obama, and the only way to get more superdelegate votes is to alienate and DIVIDE Democratic voters. If this isn't a strategy to CONQUER Democrats, what is it? Is it democracy in action to the point of self-destruction or is it the self-destructive behavior of two megalomaniacal politicians intent on using the democratic process to cause the loss of the Democratic Party's presidential candidate? It will soon reach the point that both Barrack Obama and Hillary Clinton will become unelectable as a direct result of the deliberate DIVINDING AND CONQUERING of the Democratic Party by the losing Democratic presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton. While I understand that continuing to vie to be president is within her democratic rights, I also understand the difference between reality and the futility that will put another Republican in the White House. Evidently, far too many Democrats didn't learn that if Ralph Nader had dropped out when winning was impossibility, George Bush would not have president. John McCain is counting on those Democrats to do the same for him. He couldn't do it without them

I wonder how much of the $10M is a personal loan from Hilllary Clinton