« Poll: Hillary Gaining Ground In North Carolina | Home | North Carolina GOP's Obama-Wright Ad Set To Run Tomorrow, Party Spokesperson Confirms »

Hillary's Chief Strategist On Wright: It's Time To "Move On"

In the wake of Jeremiah Wright's sudden reappearance in the presidential race today, Hillary chief strategist Geoff Garin was just asked on MSNBC whether Obama should do more to distance himself from the controversial pastor.

"Senator Obama has said what he has to say," Garin said, adding: "We respect the fact that Senator Obama has had his say on this and the campaign should move on."

Hillary, too, was asked about Wright today by reporters. While she took the opportunity to remind all of us of her earlier declaration that she would not have kept Wright as her pastor, she called on John McCain to get the North Carolina GOP not to run the ad hitting Obama over this:

"I have said that that that was a personal decision of his. I answered one question about it that made it clear I would not have stayed in that church under those circumstances," Clinton told reporters in Graham, NC.

"But, I regret the efforts by the Republicans to politicize this matter and I believe that if Senator McCain were serious he would do more than just send a letter he is the putative nominee I think he could very clearly tell the North Carolina party tell the Mississippi party that he would not tolerate those kinds of advertisements and I'm waiting to see if he does that."

Make no mistake about this. One thing that makes Wright's reappearance particularly dicey for Camp Obama is the fact that he's resurfaced totally on his own initiative.

Even if the Clinton camp were inclined to continue making a public issue of this -- as opposed to merely discussing Wright privately with super-dels -- the last day they'd want to do that is today, of all days, when he's happily plastered himself all over the news.


100 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Respect to Garin for the classy response (though I didn't see it myself.)

By contrast, Senator Clinton's moving on is about as classy as Penn's Cocaine response last fall.

user-pic

Here's the thing: I am sure it was a Mark Penn special, but the Clinton campaign was stupid for trying to make anything out of Wright on Clinton's behalf. Not only does it piss off African American voters by, in essence, demeaning their churches, if only by implication, it also will be used by Rs against other Ds, not just Obama, and it will outlive Obama. It's no coincidence that the Clinton campaign is making nice now that the GOP is rolling out its first Wright commercial for use against down ticket candidates. If you play with fire for long enough you will get burned. The perils of triangulation are many.

Is Wright hurting Obama byjust being in the news?

I'm not so sure, because he isn't saying "G-damn America", or taking about our "chickens" anymore....He sounds pretty reasonable when you don't take a soundbyte or snippet and play it over and over again.

the speeches were good, but the Q&A with the press didn't do Obama any favors.

I agree. After a strong speech, Wright seemed petty and glib in the Q&A. And if he's not trying to hurt Obama, he certainly has zero interest in helping him.

Well, it certainly shows distance between Obama and Wright. He's not his Svengali or anything.

And why shouldn't he be glib in answering some of the entirely insipid questions which were asked.

I hope Rev. Wright continues to speak out and expose the vacuous talking hairdos of the media just what they are.

The guy is brilliant.

Oooh, didn't see the Q&A prior to my last post....Now that I have, I see what you are saying. Wright represents a certain segment of the population that holds very strong views when it comes to the treatment of African Americans at the hands of the US government throughout history. There seems to be a good deal of victimhood in what he is saying, and that turns alot of people off...BUT, Obama has already said that Wright represents a "distorted view" of America. he may have to say it again, but I don't think any of this is really damaging.

The MSM keeps saying wright but i have yet to see much proof saying wright is making many democrats go republican or independents support McCain over Obama.

You could say he is Wright Light!

They won't directly say that they don't support Obama because of Wright. They will use some other reason as a cover excuse.

The whole "Wright controversy" is itself just a cover excuse.

Yawn.

Personally I wish Obama WAS more like Wright and less the can't-we-all-get-along moderate. But each man is entitled to be who he is.

user-pic

this country is going to get the candidate and president it deserves..

user-pic

if its eager to let all this nonsense take center stage again, im not to sympathetic to our situation for the pathetic state of government we continue to endorse.

Yes, move on.

Clinton will be the nominee.

The damage is done.

It is over.

user-pic

What purpose do posts like this serve, exactly?

It's just trying to be Danny talking to it's finger puppets.

They almost always provoke the response he seeks. Get it?

user-pic

I get it - I'd just love to see him admit it.

Yeah, she had to get her stab in before she moved on.

He sure has plastered himself all over the news. Also, he does not sound like he's happy that Obama did not defend him. Hence the statements about Obama being a "politician."

The man is clearly endowed with lots of ability. He appears to me to be riding a vindictive wave. Maybe this will finally help Obama in a weird sort of way. Only someone living under a rock will believe that Obama is Muslim.

I kind of agree with your assesment. It seems Wright is taking a somehwat adversarial stance against Obama. Regretable for their friendship, but I would think such a view taking hold would only help Obama with people who still aren't sure if they should link him to Wright.

I watched both Wright's NAACP address and the Press Club Q&A session, and I did not at all come away with the same impression.

Toward the end of the NAACP speech Wright made a very clear implication that Obama is his choice for president. In the Q&A he responded that he had received email messages from "white" and "white, Jewish" friends indicating that if Obama had not distanced himself from Wright's YouTube snippet comment that he would not be elected.

user-pic

MSM is doing its level best to make sure this campaign focuses on crap that won't have any impact on the country. Wright, for instance. He's retired, he's not part of Obama's campaign, Obama has explained his relationship, but Wright isn't going away, and MSM will make sure that his impact lasts far longer than his time in the limelight.

And when the media trips up and actually reports something substantive, John McCain will make sure that Wright is back in the spotlight.

And if you believe the Clinton's won't be pushing this, both publicly and privately, you must also believe that Bill Clinton won't say any more stupid stuff in this campaign.

This is dreadful stuff to watch. Dreadful.

Sickening is the word I would use.

Barack needs to get us back on track, and dispense with the "silly season" BS.

Yeah, McCain will make sure Wright will be kept front and center as will the closet Puketards in the MSM -- like this morning's Joe Scar show where David Axelrod asked (paraphrasing)"how many times does he have to say he does not agree with his former pastor?" and Mika WhateverHerNameIs said "That is a very good question."

*sigh*

I think some snarker needs to do another blog post over on the Cafe side about how Obama AGAIN has to answer for all things AA in America, apologize for it, renounce and reject it, etc. It appears to be very clear to McCain and MSM that Obama's skin color has not answered for all its contents.

user-pic

Mika Brzezinski, who is the daughter of Zbigniew Brzezinski, Jimmy Carter's National Security Advisor and an Obama supporter.

user-pic

You seem to be alleging bias here. First of all: she's a grown woman; her father's opinions are not her own. Second: she didn't seem too annoyed to be talking about this subject for the entire morning — remember this is the same woman who set a Paris Hilton story on fire because she was sick of the coverage.

Imagine that we were to invent a prize called the Quemoy and Matsu award for the story whose media coverage (as measured in minutes of air time and column-inches of newspaper coverage) was most out of proportion to its actual long-term importance to the well being of our Republic. Which do you think would win - Rev Wright or "Flag pin"-gate?

user-pic

Oh, Wright. Easily. In fact, the flag pin issue is nothing compared to Wright. Flag pins can't give speechs in public venues, or appear on Bill Moyer's show. And one can correctly point out that the other Democratic candidate doesn't wear a flag pin, either.

But then we could have a "meaningful" discussion about why women aren't expected to wear flag pins, but men are.

And once again, none of this will have any impact on our lives. The media is nauseating.

I think you are right, although to be very fair even Wright would face stiff competition for the award - not only from "Flag pin," but also from Ayers and Rezko and "Bitter"-gate and "Sniper"-gate. It is enough to make a body want to scream, the way that the trivial nonsense takes up all the attention while real issues (like John McCain's complete inability to articulate an endpoint for which we are aiming in Iraq, or his desire to make the Bush tax-cuts permanent) go completely un-noticed.

What about the Orange Juice vs. Coffee debacle? That gets my vote. I'm surprised Snuffleupagus didn't bring it up in the debate.

Ctvoeter, agreed. Just dreadful.

user-pic

yeah. how dare john mccain for politicizing wright! Hillary Clinton wouldn't do that-except for that one time when she thought it was appropriate to tell someone else what church they should belong to, but other than that...cmon!

Why is this "dicey" for Obama camp. Polls don't show the electorate very bothered by the Wright stuff so far, and now, his image will only improve as he ingratiates himself with the press and Americans who might be open to such a thing.

Those who aren't were pretty much lost to a man named Barack from the beginning.

I'm not sure I agree with the assertion that this is automatically bad for Obama, even though it does seem to be the collective opinion of the media that it is.

What are you talking about? Obama has lost his national lead over Clinton, plus his lead over McCain. The one who is more consistently ahead over McCain now is Hillary Clinton, and her lead is within the margin of error by the way. Now what the Democrats don't seem to notice is the fizz going out of Obama is taking the fizz out of the party generally. Never let it be said that they aren't good at shooting themselves in the foot. But the polls are definitely headed South for him right now and you have to have your head buried pretty deep in the sand not to notice it. which isn't to say all is lost. There are going to be lots of ups and downs before this is over. But trust me, Wright is a big problem. Not to me. If the guy were in my neighborhood, godless as I am, I'd sign on for sunday service. But I'm, you know, an arugula eating East Coast liberal and I don't count.

I agree completely. I think the more Wright publicly speaks out the more of the public realize just how brilliant the guy is. And he is entirely capable of making mincemeat out of any media pundit, just as he did to the insipid questions offered up by some in the Press Club audience.

I think the derision he displayed was entirely warranted and appropriate.

user-pic

I have heard some of Wright's comments and they seem pretty straightforward and not off the mark but to listen to the pundits its as though Wright is a terrorist bent on destroying the nation. I really don't get the complete disconnect --- its as though the MSM has decided to trash Obama anyway it can. Did Bubba promise a new round of deregulation of the MSM?

I thought the comments of CNN's Soledad O'Brien and Rolland Martin after Wright NAACP address were quite thoughtful.

The MSM will always go after the person they think is the Democratic frontrunner. It was Hillary first, so they threw a few dozen loads of crap at her and talked about how cool Obama was. Then Obama pulled into the lead and they started hammering him.

If Hillary wins in Indiana, expect them to have another about-face, just in time for them to proclaim Obama's comeback post-Oregon, and talk about how charming or whatever he is compared to Clinton. Then when the Democratic Party finally fucking succumbs to reality and nominates Obama, it'll be back to his radical friends and his elitism.

It's the same old Heather bullshit. Democrats who think that their chosen candidate is somehow immune are just deluding themselves.

user-pic

does anybody actually care about reverend wright? or is this just a media driven story? because, honestly...its mind boggling to me that cnn would follow him around to every speech he gives.

its frustrating because in the time they took airing stories on wright, they could be doing stories on the economy, or the war or how about the global food shortage?

Last night from 11-12 CNN aired the entire Wright speech to the Detroit NAACP, like they were doing a public service by showing the whole speech, and not just soundbytes. Give me a break. I mean what a joke. It was actually a fine speech, and not controversial or newsworthy in the slightest. Such a pathetic network.

Actually I saw the same last night, and one thing that noticed is that after the speech, both commentators that wera at the site (I don't remember the names) were having a look like "I don't see anything wrong with this guy, what's all the fuzz about?"

They were Soledad O'Brien and Rolland Martin. I think CNN did the voters a service in broadcasting the whole thing. Wright is brilliant and fearless.

Its easier to follow the narrative than to put together a piece on the economy or any other meaningful issue. Besides, these networks aren't providing news, they are providing entertainment in the form of giving people stories that don't challenge the views they already hold.

user-pic
Its easier to follow the narrative than to put together a piece on the economy or any other meaningful issue.


One could also take into account that it is easier to SELL the narrative than it is to SELL a piece on meaningful issues.

Audiences clamor for drama and story arc and many leave the issue stories on the shelves. One look at the People-Harper's circulation ratio will defend that one.

user-pic

I wonder if the Clinton campaign got a talking to about negative campaigning? Or if their internals show pushing Wright wasn't helping.

I suppose it could just be a show of good faith and classiness on the part of the Clintons. *snort* Sorry, I tried, but I just couldn't write that sentence with a straight face.

I haven't seen any of the Wright stuff from yesterday or today, but from what I've heard, it's not really helping Obama among the mainstream whites. Any chance the "crazy old uncle" narrative could be coming together?

She is campaigning in NC and Obama is winning 90% of the A-A vote. So, now it's time to be Not-Racist Hillary. When she was campaigning in PA and getting 70% of the Cracker vote, then it was time to be Subtly Racist Hillary.

Um, I think Jim Clyburn put the fear of god in them, Phobe Fay.

Perhaps you should "see" it before passing judgment. It is quite obvious to me that many who have commented here have not watch Wright's addresses ot the Press Club Q&A session.

user-pic

Where was I passing judgment? I was asking a question.

My judgment was on the Clinton campaign, of which I've seen plenty.

user-pic

What's going on is that the Clinton campaign is courting black voters in North Carolina. That's why they're pretending to be reasonable.

It is called FEAR! Payback is a pain.
All this means is the resurrection of The Right Rev. Wright is complete, nothing to gain by any comment.

McCain and related folks soon will see the path of righteousness.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!11

Wright:
1) Confirmed that Obama was not present at the "sound-loop" sermons, and
2) Distanced himself from politics, and Obama, just as firmly as Obama earlier distanced himself from Wright.

I'd love to hear those who claim to still be worried about Wright explain how the above is supposed to hurt Obama.

Because everything Wright says gets spun (take a look at some of the coverage), and most people only get exposed to the spin, not the actual event of his speech.

Since Clinton herself brings up her decision about staying with or leaving a church as something the voters apparently need to know about, I'd like some stories on the church (or church-like group more accurately) that she HAS chosen to stay with, this very strange-sounding "Fellowship".

Suggesting some heavenly vetting here!
Of course! Enough of the devil who has the blue dress on!

Come on.

No one has done more for "MoveOn" than Barack Obama.

You are turning out to be Idiotic's bottled twin...

Elizabeth- sounds like a job for TPM Muckraker, if anybody around here can take a little time out from aping stupid MSM horserace coverage.

user-pic
Make no mistake about this. One thing that makes Wright's reappearance particularly dicey for Camp Obama is the fact that he's resurfaced totally on his own initiative.

That's it.

I'm turning this motherfucking thing off.

You are driving me crazy with your totally gratuitous editorial comments about what is a nonissue in a race that is already over.

The blogs have totally jumped the damn shark in this election.

I'm out.

Bets on how long Tena can stay away from this stuff?

user-pic

I'm with you, Tena. I always come to TPM first, end up getting my blood pressure elevated, then go over to Kos to settle down thanks to exposure to actual facts. I'm thinking I'm going to have to go cold turkey for my health. I want to live at least long enough to go to President Obama's inauguration!

Yes.....Wright works for the Queen....part of the Clinton Group of World Control.

Having Wright out there while simultaneously going onto Fox was a stoke of genius (despite the catcalls from some screeching bloggers we know).

Whether you agree with Wright or not, the 30 second sound bites of him saying "God Damn America" don't reconcile with these other images of a smart, humorous, quick-witted (if not boisterous) man.

He had the PRESS corp. eating out of his hands this morning while answering EVERY question.

Then there's the difference in style (and rhetoric due to job choices) between Obama & Wright which are crystallized by both the appearance.

This helps in Indiana via Fox.

And finally, what can Clinton & her minions say JUST before N.Carolina that wouldn't alienate the AA vote further?

Nada.

People not liking Obama becuase of his race were never considering voting for him anyway.

This all is aimed at those who liked Obama but were taken aback by Wright.

A Missouri voter:

Imagine that we were to invent a prize called the Quemoy and Matsu award for the story whose media coverage (as measured in minutes of air time and column-inches of newspaper coverage) was most out of proportion to its actual long-term importance to the well being of our Republic. Which do you think would win - Rev Wright or "Flag pin"-gate?

Quemoy and Matsu award?
Why so obscure Greg?

Why not call it the TPM award?

Measure the minutes of video and the column inches of coverage given on TPM's homepage. Do you suspect the proportions are much different than the corporate controlled media? It is all part of the same inane food fight that is our devolution...

He has a new home and a 10 million line of credit now....he now is owed by the Clinton Group.

steve labonne,

you asked how the above wright comments are supposed to hurt obama? i accept your challenge.

had you watched full reports of all of wright's weekend commentary as i have (bill moyer's interview friday night, natl press club speech + q&a post), you'd klnow that in stating that:

(1) obama hadn't seen the full sermon, wright was tossing obama in with the rest of the media which, in wright's "superior and learned opinion", are uninformed and unwilling to confront certain "hard truths." it was akin to wright's commentary to bill moyers that obama's philly speech on race was just empty rhetoric necessitated by the reality of a political firestorm that needed to be quelled, and was a politician "just saying what a politician needed to say." he's essentially telling voters they can't believe what obama tells them, even including his being a regular church-goer because, well, he really only attends church as often as the next person, which isn't that often according to jeremiah wright.

(2) the adage in entertainment is any news is good news. the adage in politics is "good news is good news and anything else is harmful." cable news has hours and hours of airtime to fill with hundreds and hundreds of pundits to call upon for commentary and i guarantee you this will dominate the news cycle for the next 2-3 days and be a significant portion of the cycle for the balance of the week.

i don't think i need to remind you that there are elections coming up next week in indiana and north carolina, and by the political adage above and the poll #s reflected on this website, jeremiah wright right now is not good news.

I think the Clinton camp is well aware that the Obama camp would love to blame Wright on her.

user-pic

Anyone remember yesterday when Mr. Sargent was up in arms about how Senator Obama didn't obliterate FOX News for pushing the Wright story?

Unfortunately, Markos is doing it right this very second on DK.

A Couple of days late, but doing it just the same.

You just agreed with me about point 1 without even realizing it! Wright confirmed that Obama wasn't there that day, so that's the end of that canard. And you seem very confused about what you're worried about. The kinds of voters who will listen to Wright and get the message that they shouldn't believe Obama are... the very same voters who supposedly have been turning against Obama because Wright is supposed to be a dangerous kook? How does that work, exactly?

As to point two, as I said in another thread, Wright overexposure will merely induce Wright fatigue. In the future people will simply roll their eyes when somebody tries to attack Obama via Wright for the umpteenth time.

Better concern trolls, please.

It is time for the Republican-controlled Media to give this Wright controversy some fairness and enquire of Hillary Clinton and her surrogates the following:

Is it true that, (1) Hillary surrogate, Congresswoman Shiela Jackson Lee, is also a devotee of Rev. Dr. Jeremiah Wright; that he's been preaching at her home church, where she is actively involved, annually for the past 15 years and has an open invitation to return, and, that she sat in the pews for his visits and did not bat an eye?

Is it true that (2) Hillary surrogate, Rev. Marcia Dyson was not only a longtime member of Trinity United Church of Christ but also still considers Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright her pastor? That Rev. Marcia Dyson's seminary education, in part, was sponsored by Trinity UCC and encouraged by Rev. Wright? And was it not at Trinity were she first met her husband, Rev. Dr. Michael Dyson, who's been very vocal in his defense of Rev. Wright.?

And, lastly of Hillary Clinton, that if Rev. Wright would not have been her Pastor, then why did she and Bill when going through Impeachment, turn to Rev. Wright for Prayer and Support and invite him to the White House? These things should be asked and answered.

And, finally, why would Republican-controlled Media give a "retired" Rev. Wright all this attention and air time, if not to try to destroy Barack Obama! Their true Fear! That is why Republican-controlled media and talking heads are building up Hillary, tearing down Obama, while McCain courts African-Americans that Clintons have ailenated by their "kitchen sink strategy, hoping all the while that she will become Democratic nominee, then unleash "arsenol" of weapons they have against her. Something they have been planning for years!


user-pic
Make no mistake about this. One thing that makes Wright's reappearance particularly dicey for Camp Obama is the fact that he's resurfaced totally on his own initiative.

Oh right, I'd totally forgotten about that Wright guy because it's not like anyone is trying to remind us of his existence and how it is supposed to hurt Obama and all that.

http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/cgi-bin/mt-current/mt-search.cgi?IncludeBlogs=9%2C10%2C11&search=wright&x=0&y=0

You know what? If Hillary's people say Wright is an unpatriotic, angry, scary black man that ought to be good enough for us. I can't imagine that anyone would possibly be interested in whether or not those clips were an accurate representation of this man's career or his views.

And Wright himself - wanting to set the record straight on his own character and his life's work? How arrogant! If he didn't want to have his words taken out of context and his character trashed on national television, he should never have allowed a politician to be a member of his congregation. Geez. You'd think he would be pickier about who he associates with.

Well said. Wright actually may well be regretting his relationship with Obama, given Obama's tendency to lie down and play the tired old role of denouncing whoever the MSM requests that he denounce. I bet Wright feels that his generation didn't fight the good fight so the subsequent generation could go on FOX and agree that the MSM's race-baiting on Wright is "a legitimate issue".

user-pic

Hogwash. Obama made a point of not severing his ties to Wright, and did so in a very public fashion. And Wright repays him thusly.

It's completely naive to say that this PR tour of his is all about restoring Wright's reputation. He has to know that no matter what he says now, it has a detrimental effect on Obama's campaign and his ability to get his message out to voters in advance of two crucial primaries. It's poorly scheduled because the interview clips were out in advance of PA's voting and he's out full bore before NC and IN, and quite frankly, it has nothing to do with "defending the black church" or whatever other nonsense he's spouting. (And for the record, I am a devout churchgoer in the African Methodist Episcopal denomination.) It's all about Wright. The effect on Obama be damned, the good Reverend is getting his 15 minutes.

I didn't really have a problem with Wright before this. I do now.

Don't make me go Han Solo on you, Greedo!

Wright appears bitter - not better after 20 years of preaching hatemongering for whites.

Dems will agree with much of Wright's positions - Kucinich is probably sending him flowers.
But Wright is keeping the Racist pot stirred by advancing himself and his book.

There is a huge problem in our country over racial issues - but a black candidate doesn't encourage dialog by calling voters 'racist gun totin Bible thumpers.'
AND - believe it or not! - not everyone voting for Hillary is a racist. She's stronger on the issues and solutions - and is a fighter!

user-pic

In a country that has as many serious problems as this one does, I honestly cannot believe that the Rev. Jeremiah Wright is even a subject of public conversation.

When will we be a serious country again?

In a bout a year and a half, two years, when this economic downturn really begins to hit bottom, possibly ushering in a new depression.

user-pic

It'll be too late, then. Think anyone will give a hot damn about Jeremiah Wright then?

According to Bob Herbert in NYT 4/26 - Wright scares white people.
And Wright's ranting and raving against whites and the government is NOT the norm in black churches.

Has Wright apologized to Hillary for his remarks FROM THE PULPIT?
"Hillary ain't never been called a N****r!" - Rev. Wright

NOOOOOOO!!!

WWJD?? leave Wright's church.

Why would he need to apologize for that?? Was he wrong? Was "N****r" Hillary's sorority nickname?

Scientific - So Wright should just continue to be quiet like a good house n***** while his 30 years of good works continue to be reduced to snippets and sound bites? What happened to the truth shall make us free? Or is this the old canard about "we can tell the truth after we win the election"?

user-pic

The fact that you'd even use that phrase in this instance is ridiculous. This is politics, not slavery.

Staying out of the fray so someone you presumably care about (and that showed great public affection for you while defending you in a time of crisis) is not subjugating your Blackness, or whatever you're implying by the use of that word. The truth shall make us free? If we lived by platitudes, perhaps. The election is happening in the real world, and in that world, there are certain realities. Judging by the coverage this weekend and today, do you see the "truth" setting Jeremiah Wright free of the pigeon-hole the MSM, the Clintons and the GOP have put him in?

The guy doesn't have to be quiet, per se. His interview with Moyers was excellent. But the PR tour is ill-advised. What real change is he bringing about? What truth is he exposing? Of course he's entitled to defend himself, but if you think this is about anyone other than the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, you are deceived.

user-pic

Minor correction:

Staying out of the fray so someone you presumably care about (and that showed great public affection for you while defending you in a time of crisis) so that that someone is not adversely affected by you is not subjugating your Blackness, your self, ...

You are assuming that Obama will be adversely affected by this. Forget the "coverage" (i.e. "spin"). The positive impression that Wright himself has created on CNN and in the blogosphere today would appear to counter that assumption (although there has also been some negative reaction among people who no doubt would never have supported Obama anyway).

I agree this is about Jeremiah Wright. It's also about the black church, and about black people generally. The struggle to elect Obama is in part the struggle to reclaim the Democratic Party from the triangulations of Bill Clinton, so that his wife can't "Sista Souljah" and "Lani Guinier" her way to the Presidency. Haven't Iowa, South Carolina, Wisconsin, Wyoming etc. showed us that this is a new Democratic Party? Don't be overly cowed by the RNC/HRC playbook; it may not work this time.

user-pic
The positive impression that Wright himself has created on CNN and in the blogosphere today would appear to counter that assumption (although there has also been some negative reaction among people who no doubt would never have supported Obama anyway).

That's extremely naive, and I pray that Obama's people don't have that approach. Positive impression? Please. He complains about being heard mainly through out-of-context soundbites, and guess how his speeches from the weekend and today will be seen by the vast majority of Americans today?

In out-of-context soundbites.

You know what they'll be focusing on? The wisdom of his words? Hardly. But you'll hear plenty about the fact that his security was FOI (an unbelievably clumsy move - unless he just doesn't care about Obama). I'm all for the truth, brother - but he has to know how this system works. Either he does, and is deliberately trying to sabotage Obama; or he doesn't, which is even more stupefying considering what he's been through.

I agree this is about Jeremiah Wright. It's also about the black church, and about black people generally.

This PR tour is not about the Black church or Black people in general. It's about Wright. Period. There is no reason for him to be out there right now. None. I mean, damn - the GOP just used him in a swiftboat ad in NC, and this is what he thinks will be helpful? To whom?

Him.

I'm all for speaking truth to power, but he's speaking truth to the National Press Club and the NAACP. How is that helping anyone but himself?

You've extrapolated a conversation about Wright into the struggle to take back the Democratic Party from the Clintons. That's going too far. Obama's wins in the states you mentioned are great, but while I'm an avid Obama supporter and volunteer, I won't be convinced of a damned thing about this party until we see Obama delivering his inauguration address. Maybe not even then.

user-pic

One more thing: pardon my language, but who gives a fuck about the "blogosphere"? Seriously, I know a lot of people, you and me included, read these things, but don't overstate their importance - or their ability to relate to what people out there are actually discussing and how they're discussing it.

Here's how they're discussing it: "Rev. Wright sure gave Dick Cheney a rhetorical a**-whooping today, didn't he."

user-pic

Where'd you see that?

user-pic

BTW, here's just one example of how the "blogosphere" is taking the Wright news - and this is from a fucking Obama supporter:

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/04/wrights-poison.html

And if you think that Wright is helping, read this:

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/roughsketch/2008/04/obamas_pastor_reignites_race_c.html

I'm done with Wright. Obama should be, too.

I think she's feeling a little more confident and that's why she's acting magnanimous; and why shouldn't she be? The polls are going her way.

The "PR tour" is no more about Rev. Wright as an individual than the Dem nomination is about Sen. Obama as an individual. Which of course is to say that Rev. Wright's response is about Rev. Wright and his 30 years of service AND about race-baiting in all its forms.

Obama would have been much better off had he never rejected/renounced Farrakhan in the Los Angeles debate. We may never have been taken down this rabbit hole. Once you start denouncing your own people, you'll be doing it for the rest of your life. That said, I don't think this hurts him much, except among those who wouldn't have voted for him anyway. Now if Obama can just show as much courage and backbone in standing up to attacks as Rev. Wright has shown these past few days.

user-pic
Once you start denouncing your own people, you'll be doing it for the rest of your life.

What a bunch of bullshit.

I am an African-American, but I am my own man, and as such, I will denounce whomever I please. That is the right guaranteed to me as an American and as a human being. That's part of what we've been fighting for all these years - to be seen as individuals, and not as a monolithic group who all thinks and behaves alike. It IS about individuals, but that's too difficult a subject for the MSM to handle - so they generalize, and group, and associate. Evidently, Wright does not see this.

I think Wright's sermons have been taken greatly out of context and that he has been a very good man and servant of God for many, many years. Obama recognized this and as such, didn't throw him under the bus when it could've served him well to do just that. (And saying he shouldn't have dissed Farrakhan...please. He has no personal relationship with the man, never did. Yet he does with Wright, and it's a very close one. Renouncing one isn't equivalent to renouncing the other.)

Wright may not be throwing Obama under the bus with his words, but he's doing so with his actions. Forget about the people who wouldn't vote for Obama in the first place - this doesn't affect them in the least. This is about the independents, the Reagan Democrats who get scared off by the race-baiting this stuff inevitably turns into. I had the same reaction to this as I did when I first heard Wright's soundbites on CNN (a network that is obsessed with Wright). I was sickened - not because of what he said (stuff I've heard all my life, really) but because I knew how it would be used. And I know how these public appearances will be used. Until we have a serious media again, the story will be all about Wright, and for little reason.

If you want to tell people to stop denouncing their own, start with Wright. His actions damn Obama by association, whether he intends to or not. I agree that we should have never been taken down this hole. But we're here now. Obama's trying to climb out, and Wright's playing the role of the crab in the barrel, pulling his former parishioner down with his selfishness and self-aggrandizement.

I get it...Maybe Wright is doing this purposely to distance the two of them...is it my blinders that make me see Wright being adversarial as a good thing for Obama

Since the Wright matter began I have said that in the short term it would have little effect,if any. Also, I thought it would be beneficial in the long term. In sum the reason is that their is more to Wright than Wright as he is a well known in his respective communities that are wide, varied, and powerful. Secondly, he is rather adept at speaking for himself. Finally, this country and society has a great hunger for anyone who can speak with experience, knowledge, and depth; Wright life has prepared him for this challenge.

Race is a issue that will not go away in this election nor for many election to come. Wright has stated that the issue is attacks on the Black church not himself, maybe or maybe not. In his Pa. speech Obama addressed race and spent little time on Wright, the critical point addressed concerned generational difference in approach. The sound bites were selected to illicit the reaction that were received, condemnation and so on with the underlying subtext of racial anger, racist stews, etc. Wright is in the superior position as regard the issue of race; Obama is running for the presidency of the U.S.A. and he or no one else can devote all energy and time to any one issue. Wright is well placed thanks to the pundits, those select sound bites and Obama's Pa. speech.

Now,that the resurrection of The Right Reverend Wright is now complete the pundits, McCain and Clinton have to confront more than a sound bite. The latter two have closed shop, and the pundits do not want to receive the treatment that ABC got at the last debate.
Wright does not have the limitations of Obama, and many will gladly listen to him since his resurrection.The press and the politicians will look foolish as Wright will no longer carry the labels of those sound bites. Politically for Obama, Wright is the revered former minister.

Most people do not live in the narrative and meme world, and even the least bit of association with the crap of Bush and Rove will not be of use for anyone. The sound bite trick will not work on The Right Revered Wright nor will it have any effect on Obama's campaign. Stop living in rove's world.

As one above noted " Now if Obama can just show as much courage and backbone in standing up to attacks as Rev. Wright has shown these past few days." Obama is Wright lite, the question is this enough? The political garbage associated with this let it go.......

user-pic

What was wrong with the Q&A? I just watched a long clip and thought he was smart, engaging, witty and right on target with most of the answers. And funny! I'm still smiling.

Guilt by association is the lowest politics. I don't want a President that goes around denouncing past friends who are a little nutty. Or a lot nutty.

In college, like the Clintons, I supported McGovern which sounds liberal now. But at the time it was considered a "pro-establishment" position. When I left law school I could have become a public defender (thought about it) but joined a law firm instead.

As I get older I look for practical solutions and I recognize talented people (like Obama for instance) who can bring all sides together. Anyway, I'm hardly a bomb throwing radical.

But when I think back on this warm pudding of a life, I recall several characters who, from time to time, were very close to me. I remember fondly, for instance, a young man who shared living quarters with me who was a self-avowed Maoist. I thought the guy was great because he could argue with me from an absolutely opposite point of view, honing my increasingly moderate views. He was my friend. I was "best man" at his wedding.

I've known all manner of Communists, self-proclaimed "revolutionaries," religious zealots, druggies, and I even dated a woman who thought the pro-life movement was a secret international plot. I've also known fans of heavy metal rock, who are the hardest to take. But I loved 'em all.

And damnit, I would not denounce any of them!

They are as much a part of me as the people I agreed with, or the people on the other side of the spectrum -- traditionalists, Republicans, several southern friends who believe the confederate flag is an appropiate garnish for a state capitol building. I liked them too. They were friends.

Now I'm not running for President. And there are many reasons I could not do so successfully. (I can neither play basketball or bowl.) But the fact I am comfortable living in a country and having close associations with the wildest compadres you can imagine -- is what I call a qualification not a disqualification.

I guess you can tell what I think of the shallowness of trying to link Obama to every weirdo he's ever known. Anyone worthy of being President had better know some weirdos -- they're Americans too!

Garin coumes out and says (on behalf of "Hillary campaign") that we should move on - but Hillary's supporter and contributor, on the other hand, is the one arranging for Wright to be the guest speaker at the press club event. Out of which side of Hillary's mouth are we supposed to glean the truth?

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address