« New Hillary Ad Shows Bin Laden, Asks: "Who Do You Think Has What It Takes?" | Home | Obama Camp On New Hillary Ad: "We Already Have A President Who Plays The Politics Of Fear" »

Hillary Campaign Chief: There's "Nothing Negative" About New Ad Showing Bin Laden

Is the new ad just released by Hillary -- which flashes imagery of Bin Laden and says that if you can't stand the heat, you should get out of the kitchen -- a positive or negative ad?

According to Hillary chief strategist Geoffrey Garin, there's nothing negative about it.

"It states the reason why Hillary Clinton is the right choice to be president now," Garin said on a conference call with reporters just now. He added that "the premise of this ad and this campaign is that we're at a moment where we need a president who's got the strength and the knowledge to take on very tough challenges."

Garin said: "To say that she is the best choice on those things, there's nothing negative about that."

Pressed on whether the "get out of the kitchen" line was a direct reference to Obama, given that the Hillary campaign alleged that Obama was "complaining" about the Philly debate, Garin said:

"We would well have used that phrase before the debate, and in my conversations, I did use it before the debate."

Worth noting: Just after the "red phone" ad appeared, former Hillary chief strategist Mark Penn argued that it was a "positive ad."

Dropping a last-minute bomb in order to sow doubts about Obama among the late-breaking undecideds -- and doing it in the guise of an ad only mentioning Hillary -- worked in Ohio and Texas. Camp Hillary is hoping that the tactic will deliver a second time.

We'll see tomorrow.

Late Update: I should add that opinions differ on whether the "red phone" ad worked -- some have argued that it didn't really affect the outcome. The point, however, is that the Hillary team thinks it worked, which obviously explains why they're trying this tactic again.

Late Late Update: Here's the audio from the call:


61 Comments

| Leave a comment

The Obama response should be the Iraq war and taking our eye off the ball, etc. etc.

Whatever it takes to beat his dumb ass.

The ABC questions weren't tough. They could have
been answered elegantly, and to his advantage.

Instead, he fell flat on his face.

Oh, come on.

This is the most transparent attempt at trolling I've ever seen. It's widely agreed that the ABC debate was a debacle. If Clinton had been steadily attacked for 40 of the first 45 minutes of that debate, you'd be howling in indignation.

And on your "whatever it takes" comment: of course, that's been the Clinton philosophy for the last several months. Damn the consequences, and who cares whether Obama's the pick for the general election. It's pathetic.

Obama's run, by comparison, a squeaky clean campaign. Even if I didn't think he was the stronger candidate against McCain, I'd still say that his brand of politics is definitely something I hope to see succeed, both now and in the future.

The Obama response against Hillary should be the Lyndon Johnson ad against Barry Goldwater (the infamous nukes and daisies ad -- so powerful Johnson only had to drop it once.)

Obama should take the iconic scene from Dr. Strangelove of the bomb-riding General slap McCain's face on it, and open the bomb-bay doors.

Greg: Wasn't the original 3AM ad dropped on Saturday, and then given massive airplay until Tuesday for 4 days straight to move the undecided voters into Clinton's camp?

So, how much of an impact would this have on undecideds a day out before the primary?

It's true, there's nothing negative about it. Just tin-eared over-the-top hilarity.

"Dropping a last-minute bomb in order to sow doubts about Obama among the late-breaking undecideds -- and doing it in the guise of an ad only about Hillary -- worked in Ohio and Texas. And Camp Hillary is hoping that the tactic will deliver a second time."

Flyonthewall refutes this argument better than I can, but the negative ad did not cause Obama to lose.

Obama never led in OH, and it was always too close to call in Texas, where the Clintons have deep roots with the majority of Hispanics.

When Hillary wins tomorrow (as expected) it's simply because the demographics favor her.

This ad will have little to no effect.

user-pic
This ad will have little to no effect.

I disagree. It will push Hillary further into debt; that is what effect it will have.

Bingo!


You're totally right, and yet the MSM are so incredibly simpleminded, that that is how they'll spin it.

It's almost a self-fulfilling prophesy: They play her "bombshell" (in truth, laughably juvenile) ad for free 10,000 times today and tomorrow, asking the question "will this scare voters about Obama's lack of experience" (thereby reinforcing the bogus pretence that Hillary is experienced and Obama is not, despite 4 more years in elected office).

Truth, logic and fairness matter not to the criminally stupid media elite in this country. The same assclowns who brought us that fun guy to have a beer with. 4000 dead US soldiers later and nothing's changed.

I suspect that it's intent is to stem the defections their internal polling is showing at the last minute here, because I'm pretty sure they're seeing some leakage.

I got a call from a very depressed-sounding Clinton working the other night, begging people to come to her appearance on campus last night. 1,500 showed up and that number was the headline on all the news stories.

http://www.seattlepoliticore.org/2008/04/20/on-the-road-in-pennsylvania-low-turnout-at-penn-state-hillary-clinton-rally/

Obama drew 22,000.

Bill was in that same arena a few weeks ago and got 6,500. It was basically full then. This was pitiful, but may be a leading indicator on how the day is going to go tomorrow.

Sorry. "its". I hate that.

Given the Bosnia, Annie Oakley, and the last debate, this is a bit overkill; Team Clinton likely blew it on this one.

The ad is not negative. It is absurd. Hillary is no FDR and Iraq is not WWII.

She does this every time. The late breakers usually go more toward her because she either drops fearmongering ads or drops mailers or robocalls full of lies and distortions. Or she cries.

Positive my ass, you could just the same kind of rationalizing coming directly from Bush or Rove. Give me a break.

user-pic

You are exactlty right.

Remember the day before the New Hampshire primary? Rember this?

"I don't think it was by accident that Al-Qaeda decided to test the new prime minister," Clinton said here, referring to two devices which did not go off in London and a car which was crashed into Glasgow airport in June.

"They watch our elections as closely as we do ... they play our allies."

The former first lady's comments day before the New Hampshire primary, in which Obama is poised according to opinion polls to inflict a second damaging defeat on her White House campaign, after his Iowa caucuses victory last week.

"Let's not forget, you are hiring a president not just to do what a candidate says he or she will do in an election," Clinton said.

"You are hiring a president who will be here when the chips are down, and problems pile up, because that's when you really need somebody who knows exactly what has to be done, to make the tough decisions."


http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jB8n288YSUL-mMk3_2pTlq43xjoA

Bin Laden hit Hillary's New York back on 9/11/2001

What has she actually done about it since.

Not a damn thing. Bin Laden is still at large.

What has Hillary done about it.

She voted to Invade Iraq, and recently voted
to give Bush/Cheney a green light to attack Iran.

Hillary is the new Lieberman.

Greg:

Can you ask them about the Drudge leak of their internal polls? Josh, your boss, seems to have some questions about the veracity of the leak.

internals do tend to favor the candidate who commissioned them, unless the news is so dreadful -- Bush 1992 -- that the responses just can't be spun any other way.

user-pic


ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Didn't quite get the reaction y'all expected from that ad, I take it?


LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!

user-pic

Obama already replied, SC Madden - he released Bill Clinton's statement about fear vs. hope.

He's now running as Bill Clinton against Hillary-Joe. Every time she gets this outrageous, he releases one of Bill's old statements on the subject.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yeah, it's unfortunate for Hillary that Bill ran as a Democrat in 1992. It really hinders her run as a Republican this year.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXum_-8I1TA
Rendell praising Farrakhan

So let's seee..the Jews are afraid of Obama because of Wright's church bulletin praising Farrakhan and allowing Hamas to put a letter in the bulletin..and Obama is guilty by association due to Wright being his pastor...not anything he himself said or did. His pastor alone brands him as anti-Semitic.

Then we have Ed Rendell, who IS a jew..praising Farrahkan at a Nation of Islam event..and he is endorsing Hillary...and Hillary is NOT anti-semitic?

Is it because she pledged to respond with massive retaliation in the middle East?

This is one twisted nation.

Hillary is the one who laughed and demeaned Obama as naive because he said he would go after AL-Q in the hills of Pakistan!!

Now we are suppose to believe that she will hunt down OBL when she is afraid to even hunt him down in Pakistan after voting to authorize the President to do precisely that?

Hillary is pathetic

Interesting... such tactics "worked in Texas"... where Hillary lost.

user-pic

Word up.

Clearly, who I want is the co-president of the man who stood by as AQ built all those camps in Afghanistan in the first place. Even if he did bomb that factory in the Sudan.

Obama was right, in a much overlooked quip, that Hillary learned the wrong lessons from the rightwing's smears against her in the 90s. Now she's embraced GOP tactics, including the one they used against Max Clealand.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHFREDHB-nQ

Hillary Turdblossom Clinton has passed The Fear Monger In Chief Threshold!!!!

user-pic

Now that's what I call a comment, liam!


LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!

No. I've always thought Howard "Maddog" Wolfson was her Turdblossom. Without the blossom, though.

The point, however, is that the Hillary team thinks

Now see, that's where we may have a difference of opinion. . .

He's right, it's not a negative ad. It's a CRAPPY ad. It does a terrible job of demonstrating that Clinton is ready to make the decisions any more than her self-serving claim to be ready on day 1. In short, it has no message.

Crappy ad. And given their money woes, one would think they would be more judicious on what they spend their limited funds. But hey, I'm not ready on day 1, what do I know.

All this talk about whether the ad is positive or negative. All this emphasis on whether or not the campaign is positive or negative. Aren't Obama supporters able to see what a smoke screen that is? Obama can't take the heat, so he tries to turn down the oven, or at least change the subject to how hot the oven is. He wimped out in the ABC debate and then spend days whining about it. Hillary has come out of this campaign with an enhanced reputation as a fighter - a reputation she has been building for decades. So Obama tries to turn that into a negative for her instead of a negative for him. But everybody knows that the Fall campaign is going to be brutal. Good luck, Obama supporters, convincing the Republicans that we need a newer, above-the-belt-only, intellectual-discussion kind of politics this fall where each candidate gives polite, high-minded thirty-seven minute speeches that show off their oratory skills.

Hillary has come out of this campaign with an enhanced reputation as a fighter - a reputation she has been building for decades.

I would not characterize it as fighting. Obama describes it well.

You seem bitter.

user-pic

Yeah, because heaven knows it's not working now. Oh, wait.

user-pic

Amazing. Appalling. Doesn't anyone in the Hillary camp remember the bin Laden tape that appeared just days before the 2004 election, and imho, by frightening a number of the remaining undecideds, did a lot to help elect GWB? Is bin Laden really who they want to emulate? Does she really want to win that badly, that she needs to use fear in order to do it?

Clinton and her advisors don't seem to realize it, but it's exactly this sort of campaigning that is turning voters off, and her tendency to rely on it may explain a significant portion of her relatively poor showing so far in the primaries.

I don't have my hopes up high about tomorrow's primary.

I think Pennsylvania is a lost cause for Senator Obama, this Reuters report brings me back to reality.

http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSN2143242920080421


people are really taking that verbal mistatement using the adjective& verb, bitter and cling personal.


I hark back to the optimism some commenters had her on his chances of winning Pennsylvania back in early March, when then Obama's only problem was not being able to win big states against Hillary. Pennsylvania is a big state which I think would have been too close to call if bitter-gate, flag pin gate or Rev. Wright never happened regardless.
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2008/03/obama_wins_wyoming_caucuses.html


(just to note, the MSM is partially responsible for this, ABC News broke the Wright controversy and the questioning of Obama not wearing a lapel pin if anyone never realized this.)


He's not going to win PA, but let's remember Senator Clinton was up by an average 20 points in March. He's narrowed that significantly. If he can keep it under 10, it's a win....

First of all it's Reuters news service, then they cite Newsmax/Zogby for the article's poll results.

You proud of your gal, Greg? Bush scare tactics coming from a Democrat doesn't bother you? This is who she really is, you know. It isn't just politics. This is the real her.

Lemme guess: Another "bombshell" negative ad that the mass media will run 20,000 times for free for her, with mock surprise that "wow, she's really slamming Obama with this negative ad!" and "will it work?"

By repeatedly playing it for free, she effectively gets free ad time.

She did it last time, and the MSM eats it up like candy. They love negative ads, and love to help her out in gaming elections with last minute bullshit.

After PA, even though it was her state anyway, they'll pretend that the Osama ad was a "game changer".

Can the media be just that shallow and simpleminded? The answer is clearly yes. I've come to the conclusion that most of the media elite have the critical thinking skills of a 12 year old.

This ad isn't negative, just like Hillary's chances at the nomination aren't a snowball's chance in...

The same terrorist organization that struck the twin towers on 9/11/01, had truck bombed them in 1993 when the great "Two for the price of One" Clintons were running the country.

That same terrorist organization went on to bomb American Embassy after Embassy, and the US Cole, while the Great Clintons were in charge. That same terrorist organization was left intact by the Clintons, and therefore were capable of bringing down the Twin Towers on 9/11/01 because The Clintons did not take effective action to destroy those Terrorists.

Ready from day one, my Arse. Hillary Turdblossom Clinton is lying her arse off, as is her custom.

Stupid ad

Hillary is Pennsylvania's Own Daughter, Rambo, Annie Oakley, Gonzo Duck Hunter, The People's Beer Drinker.

Now --

She is FDR and Osama Hunter?!

LMAO!

Underlying message of the ad -- I campaign just like a Republican, so you should send me off to face the Republican in November.

But imagine her national security creds [sniper fire, married draft dodger] up against war hero McCain. In what universe is it a sane strategy to try to out-hawk the Republicans?

On this very point, I've heard it said by a Bush guy that when the '04 Dem convention turned into a patriotic tribute to Kerry's war record they privately said "we've got him."

Ed Rendell praise Farrakan and Nation of Islam

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXum_-8I1TA

HILLARY TURDBLOSSOM CLINTON HAS PASSED

THE FEAR MONGER IN CHIEF THRESHOLD.

Say "G'night" Shrillary.

You're done!

2:20 minutes since this was post on TPM and not a single person recommended it?

LOL.

Great Ad. Should have gone farther in painting Obama and his supporters as unpatriotic turds.

Why are you so bitter? It's not like she's not a fighter and can't take the kitchen heat, is it? I would have thought that her supporters would be very upbeat and overflowing with confidence.

user-pic

Yes, because to love Hillary is to love America, right? Troll.

She's behind the numbers on the score board, the clock is ticking, with 10 milliom $$$ debt, another "firewall" is not really "firewall" any more, this Bin Laden ad should show us how DESPERATE the campaign feels...

user-pic

Fear-monger-in chief? Bush scare tactics?

Considering the mostly dopey HRC ad we're talking about, this is just a wee bit hyperbolic. But then even the mainstream press is starting to pick up on the all too regular squeals of faux outrage from Obama's campaign/surrogates/supporters. It mighty be an idea to cut back on the boy-who-cried-wolf stuff or come the GE, no one will be paying attention at all when the GOP starts lobbing the real thing.

Memo to: Hillary
From: Turdblossom2 (Howie)

SUBJECT: Our chances look GRRRREAT!!

Lessee, how're we doing the night before Pennsylvania....

Piss off the activist base of the party? Check. (Thanks to all my peeps, but especially you!)

Piss off and dismiss half of those who are left (Men)? Check. (Thanks, Nora)

Piss off the AA voters, bedrock of the party? (A special mention to Bill and Penn and Howie.) Check.

Piss off all the states that didn't vote for you? Check.

Keep the Porcine Penn around a long time, until forced to fire his double-dealing butt? Check.

Mismanage your first big executive job, universal health care? Check.

Then screw up your campaign management just to be sure everyone knows what kind of job you'd do as president? Check.

Vote to authorize the war because you were trying to stay "viable" for an eventual run for president, and then be so blinded by ambition that you didn't correct it until waaaaaay too late? Check

Conduct your campaign in such a way as to be able to win only by playing the gender card, and the race card? Check.

Fail to realize that Bill is a liability, not an asset? Check.

And finally, fail to realize that even those who once liked you are increasingly repelled by the lack of character and leadership you exhibit? Check.

I think that about covers everything we should have done. I'm a genius.

Oh, yeah. We're gonna win this thing! Hillary '08!!!!!

I have more respect for Geoff Garin than I do for Mark Penn (I could probably say the same about almost any human being on the face of the planet), but this is awfully Penn-like. Perhaps this indicates the problem isn't Penn per se but Hillary herself. I guess you can't step in the door without being caught in the maelstrom of sleaze.

Once the Democratic nomination is over, once Obama has been chosen as the party's candidate and is on his way to become the next president of the USA - well then Clinton can withdraw to her cave, lick her self-inflicted wounds and plead insanity: after all she had been suffering from post-traumatic stress syndrome caused by the heavy sniper fire she incurred in Bosnia. Clinton's campaign makes Karl Rove and his minions look like gentlemen, McCain may surely be much better than Bush, but Clinton isn't - they look eye to eye, they are at the same level.

Hey observer2,

"that most of the media elite have the critical thinking skills of a 12 year old."

stop insulting 12 year olds!

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address