« Mason-Dixon: Clinton Ahead By Five In Pennsylvania | Home | Gallup: Obama Leads Clinton By Two Points »
Hillary And Obama Exchange Another Volley Of Pennsylvania Ads
Hillary goes up in Pennsylvania with a new statewide spot saying Obama "couldn't answer tough questions in the debate" and responding to an earlier Obama ad on health care...
And Obama's up with a new spot hitting back at an earlier Hillary ad and reiterating his message that he doesn't take "one dime" from PACs and lobbyists...
Advertisement















Must be close if they're both coming out swinging so hard.
April 20, 2008 3:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Which ad is Obama referring to here?
April 20, 2008 3:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
A 527 for Hil-liar-y put out an ad accusing him of leaving out 15,000,000 with his healtcare plan. It came out Thursday or Friday I believe.
April 20, 2008 4:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
What did Randi Rhodes call Hillary...Oh yeah.....SHE WAS RIGHT ON......
I am looking forward to the ClintonS being pariahs in the Dem Party....
Hey Hillary there is always the Connecticut for LIEberman Party....right up your alley GIRL!
April 20, 2008 3:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ad infinitum.
April 20, 2008 3:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have to say this is one of Obama's better response ads. Generally, I think Obama needs to be a bit more creative and humorous in his advertising, but this one is pretty good.
April 20, 2008 3:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's a good move on the part of his campaign.
It actually turns her negative ad against him into a negative ad against her.
April 20, 2008 3:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well take heart. I just sat through Frank Lunz doing one of his `strategy rooms` with a bunch of Rep. Dem & Ind voters in Pa. They didn't like Hillary's ad: too negative. (According to him it's a general truism of all voters - they don't like negative ads.) They did like Obama's. (And were shocked by all the lobbyists she's taken money from)
April 20, 2008 11:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Camile Paglia, on why women shouldn't vote for Hillary:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/04/19/wuspols219.xml
I have seen women quoted as saying having a woman break through the last glass ceiling is more important than any other issue. More important that the lies about Bosnia. More important than the war in Iraq and her vote for that. More important than solving the health care crises. Just more important than anything else. That just seems dumb, and i wish someone would explain the thinking behind that sort of single issue approach.
April 20, 2008 3:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
You need to hang out with a different group of women. I don't know a single female Clinton supporter who would vote for a candidate just because the candidate was a woman. Not a single one.
Maybe a stray commenter here and there might make such a claim (that the most important issue is breaking the glass ceiling), but I've never heard anyone outside the hothouse atmosphere of the comment sections for blogs say such a thing. Never.
And Camille Paglia is about as meaningful as Maureen Dowd is when it comes to commenting on women.
April 20, 2008 3:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
There are many women online saying "it's her turn", if that's not voting single issue, what is?
April 20, 2008 4:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
I know that many women online are saying that, but I am quite certain that they wouldn't be saying that, if, for instance, the Democratic nominee was a male, and the Republican nominee was a female.
It's easy to be categorized as a single issue voter in this particular primary season because the differences between Obama and Clinton just aren't that great (Iraq war vote, the major exception).
And for what it's worth, I'm a woman and I'm not a Clinton supporter.
April 20, 2008 4:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
We haven't done the GOP experiment. It's quite possible that GOP women would say the same thing.
Also, let's remind ourselves that it was Hillary who kept making this campaign "historic" because she is a woman. In other words, she kept reminding us...
Love her or hate here, Paglia makes the accurate point that Pelosi doesn't suffer the same negative gender issues -- and Pelosi is *2nd* in line for the Presidency currently.
I say, live by the gender identity issue, die by the gender identity issue. Hillary should have run as an American with solid policies. Instead, when convenient, she ran as a woman.
April 20, 2008 5:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
I realize it was just one person (and I can't find the story at the nyt.com now... it was up yesterday), but a woman who lives just outside of Philadelphia was quoted in a story about the campaign here in the state as saying (paraphrasing), that she was going to vote for Hillary because things were pretty good when Bill was president, and "maybe she had something to do with that."
So, not a hothouse blogger, just an incredibly stupid person.
I've been baffled by the virtually bullet-proof support by "older white women" as the reports like to say, all despite what seems plenty of evidence that Hillary has feet of clay and has serious, serious negatives. I just don't get it. It's not like she's the only woman who'll ever be a viable candidate, is it?
April 20, 2008 5:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
We witnessed one of the biggest meltdowns in political history in the last debate leaving an opening for the gop to attack him knowing he his is weak and wounded.
This leads to Obama going negative in a pathetic attempt to fight back. Yet, he is still spewing he is a different kind of politician and pretends to shake it off.
Too bad he can't shake off his radical friends, his radical beliefs, the lies he has told and without apologizing for insulting the voters.
April 20, 2008 3:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Total buffenbargering going on here. Color me SHOCKED! SHOCKED! that it's coming from gotalife.
April 20, 2008 3:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
lol
April 20, 2008 3:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
He didn't want to knee cap you leader as she obviously doesn't mind doing to him. But, I guess if you had an ounce of common sense you would figure that one out. There's a lot to be said for getting an education.
April 20, 2008 4:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
He loses PA by 20.
April 20, 2008 3:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
C'mon.
Grow some 'nads, son.
Why not predict *more than* 20?
Gutless.
Punk.
April 20, 2008 3:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Of course this is after her senior strategist want on MTP this morning and said they weren't running any negative ads...
Her ads are sounding more and more harsh. I don't think it is a good move for her with her negatives, but who knows.
April 20, 2008 3:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think being more negative is a good thing for her, either, but I'm not looking at the internal polling.
In any event, I actually think the Obama ad is a good rebuttal to Clinton's. It reduces her ad(s) to nasty inside DC politics.
April 20, 2008 3:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillery could use a "good rebuttal" Her current one is putting a lot of stress on her pantsuits!
April 20, 2008 3:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're funny.
April 20, 2008 3:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
I meant that for gotalife.
April 20, 2008 3:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
gotnolife....LMAO
Who pays you to post on every blog, Taylor Marsh or Jeralyn?....LMAO
April 20, 2008 3:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gotta love the red-baiting undertones to Clinton's latest ad.....real inspiring.
Why wasn't Meredith Brooks on the short-list for her campaign song? Would have been more appropriate than Celine Dion.
April 20, 2008 3:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
With Gotalife, Hillary still has her base support of comb-over voters.
April 20, 2008 3:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gotalife is the Chairmen of Short Bus Trolls for Queen Mistakes of Tuzla.
April 20, 2008 3:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Um, what questions couldn't he answer? I remember him answering everything just fine. I did love her stumbling explanation of her lying about Bosnia though, that was probably the low point as far as performance went for the debate.
April 20, 2008 5:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Um, what questions couldn't he answer? I remember him answering everything just fine. I did love her stumbling explanation of her lying about Bosnia though, that was probably the low point as far as performance went for the debate
Yeah, good point. I thought she did horrible in that debate and it still bothers me till this day. Funny how the pundits over look that she said she was sleepy again.......So full of shit she is...lol...
April 20, 2008 11:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just some political ad fun:
"Barack's attacks are 'destructive' and 'poisoning'"
But note the date on this statement:
February 1, 2008
Like 10 weeks ago.
Couldn't Hillary come up with a better, more recent quote?
Sheesh.
April 20, 2008 5:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
heh talk about misleading
April 20, 2008 7:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
You go, Hillary! Great ad. As for Obama's, did you notice how he said that he doesn't take money from Federal lobbyists? But Hillary didn't accuse him of that. She accused him of taking money from STATE lobbyists. And what is Obama's response to that? He says he doesn't take money from Federal lobbyists, and adds that Hillary is negative. Another tough question goes unanswered.
April 20, 2008 10:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ummmmm if I could, I wish I could have that vote on the Iraq war resolution, but I didnt do anything wrong and Im perfectly comfortable with my vote!
Yes, I misspoke on bosnia 3 times claiming we landed under sniper fire.Yeah, Bill often puts me and his daughter in danger. When that person questioned me about it in the last debate, I'm still going to go with I was sleepy!
Im campaigning that I dont agree with the Columbian trade deal, however my head campaign manger sneaking off to make deals with them should be ignored. Oh, and pay no attention to Bill adding $800 thousand to our Joint Account that came from that deal.
--------------------------------------
Come on, we cant call a liar a liar. People have been sentenced to life in prison on flimsier evidence than this stuff....If it wasn't so serious it knowing that she is running for the highest office in the world, it would be extreemly funny to think average people are buying this crap!
April 20, 2008 11:52 PM | Reply | Permalink