« Poll: Clinton Ahead By Nine Points In Pennsylvania | Home | Bill Clinton: Older Voters Not Falling For Obama »

Franklin And Marshall: Clinton Ahead By Six In Pennsylvania

The new poll of Pennsylvania by Franklin and Marshall College, one of the state's most prominent pollsters, confirms that the Democratic race is a close one. There's been significant movement since their last poll from just under a month ago:

Clinton 46% (-5)
Obama 40% (+5)

Pollster Terry Madonna thinks the "small town" flap has yet to fully play out with the voters: "With the new commercial and the San Francisco statements, can she push the lead back to double digits?"


34 Comments

| Leave a comment

Yawning.......

Her Royal Clinton is sinking.

Make it stop!!!!

Please!

user-pic

You mean you aren't appreciate the avalanche of contradictory polls?

Not at all. Just put me to sleep until after it's over. I'm sure come April 22nd the confetti will fall and the 'comeback gal' will be moving on to the next contest.

Rinse, Wash, Repeat. Barack was right--it is like a really good movie that has gone on too long.

Except he didn't say that, he said "some people come to me and say it's like a good movie that...."

Clinton mis-interpreted that and said: "my opponent said.... , but let me tell you, I LIKE long movies *cackle*".

_sad_

Yes. I would compare it even more to watching late-night tv.

It's late. There's nothing good on. You know there's nothing good on. You should get up and go to sleep. But you're too tired to get up. So you keep flipping channels. Hmm, let's see . . . a little trumped-up scandal here. I think I'll try another poll.

Really pretty silly to watch the media flopping around like a pig in mud to push this horse race mentality ... as they keep silently emphasizing political gamesmanship as being reputable and dignified substantive qualities.

Actually, President Clinton was attacking Obama for comparing his leadership to w's failed leadership. You have to actually read the article because that blog is unhinged about bittergate.

Very sad because it use to be pretty good.

Well, economically he's right. The deregulation that is partially responsible for the mess we're in right now started in the 90s.

I hope they never stop polling, 'cause people would have no idea how they were supposed to vote and it could be all chaos!

Of course if the Polls came back showing Barack getting blown out by 30 points, then all these pundits would be screaming "SEE HE IS DONE IT IS OVER!!!!!" on the mountain tops.

Give me a got d@mn break already...are these pollsters and pundits really that retarded to think that it takes FIVE WHOLE DAYS for people to find something offensive in Obama's words? That is even more condescending than people have been pretending Obama's remarks were.

Just admit it...the media blew this out out proportion and the voters who actually have real f*&king problems don't give a crap.

Gas has gone from 3.79 (yesterday) to 3.81 this morning to 3.85 this evening...I'm a helluva lot more concerned about that than this manufactured controversy and as the polls have now clearly shown...most people are too.

The elitist media thinks it takes five days for the Pony Express to deliver Obama's quotes to all those rural PA folks. Maybe a week. It's hell when you don't have cable out there. The bitter have not yet spoken.

user-pic

Arugula, people in rural areas have had cable since the 70's - you couldn't get any TV without it unless you had one of those 10-foot satellite dishes in your backyard.

...

Eric: Please include the dates of the interviews in the poll write-up "The survey findings presented in this release are based on the results of interviews conducted April 8-13, 2008."

...

If this poll is supposed to show Obama being hurt by the 'bitter' comment, then what caused Hillary's numbers to drop by a statistically significant 5 points since the last Franklin & Marshall poll? Remaining fallout from Bosnia? Or possibly it's people sick of her negative, Rovian attack machine that obviously hasn't changed course even after moving Penn out of the driver's seat.

Of course if the Polls came back showing Barack getting blown out by 30 points, then all these pundits would be screaming "SEE HE IS DONE IT IS OVER!!!!!" on the mountain tops.

Give me a got d@mn break already...are these pollsters and pundits really that retarded to think that it takes FIVE WHOLE DAYS for people to find something offensive in Obama's words? That is even more condescending than people have been pretending Obama's remarks were.

Just admit it...the media blew this out out proportion and the voters who actually have real f*&king problems don't give a crap.

Gas has gone from 3.79 (yesterday) to 3.81 this morning to 3.85 this evening...I'm a helluva lot more concerned about that than this manufactured controversy and as the polls have now clearly shown...most people are too.

Wow! Is that really our host, Josh, posting just now.

Keep alert kind sir, the trolls are thick and nasty down here under the bridge.

And it seems safe to say that the polls can't tell us much this time. They are all over the place. We're just going to have to wait for the real polls to close in Pennsylvania to see the ending of this thriller.

user-pic

Gee, do you think one week is enough time to teach elementary school math to The Greatest Political Team on Television?

If I hear one more pundit bloviating about Clinton's Big Mo, when she has no serious way of overtaking Obama's delegate lead, my head will explode.

I stopped watching CNN after Super Tuesday. The "greatest political team" is too insecure for me--they have to reassert it every other minute.

Interesting. That's about when I stopped watching, too. Don't even remember exactly why. It was just time.

user-pic

I refuse to get cable and rarely watch broadcast TV for exactly that reason. It just leads to channel surfing, lowered standards, and brain rot. The few good programs are on DVD or otherwise available.

Doing good journalism in a commercial broadcast TV format is close to an impossibility. Broadcast format is inherently inferior to on-demand medium which includes blogs, newspapers, podcasts, etc. The benefits of a homogenized and shared broadcast experience (if even possible anymore) are more than offset by the lowest common denominator effect.

Commercial TV is incredibly insulting to the intelligence of viewers and a huge time waster. Nobody who values thier time is going to concentrate on serious issues only to have that repeatedly interrupted by random, and usually insulting, product advertisements, every several minutes.

The commercials themselves are aimed almost exclusively at morons. Chevron claiming to be a green company. Cadillac implying a more sexual and liberated woman should buy their new SUV to get "turned on." It's vomit.

BTW, is there a Veracifier podcast? I know podcasts are so five-minutes-ago, but how else can I keep my blood pressure up? She's up! She's down! He's all-temperature! It's a disaster!

(Making fun of the newstream, not TPM)

PS cool to see your avatar, Josh :)

Sonic commercials are usually pretty funny, though. But I'm with you. No cable, no dish - just a big tacky antenna on top of our house.

All these polls make me a saaaaaad panda.

Man, it's been two whole days of the business week now. If Pennsylvanians haven't been able to find out about Obama's comments and the firestorm surrounding them by this point, then maybe they are clinging to guns and religion instead of paying attention.

I mean that with no disrespect to the good people of Pennsylvania.

The Republicans must be scared out of their fucking minds. Obama's survived another flareup- one that his own words created!

He's plated in Teflon and he's got a lethal left hook. He's gonna fuck up Johnny Mac.

user-pic

As I posted in another comment thread last week...what do the polls mean? Bupkes, that's what they mean. Bupkes. Clinton is pulling farther ahead, Obama is catching up, all bupkes.

When the PA primary is held, then we'll know what'll happen in PA. Not until then. Given the massive spread of the polls, we don't know anything.

Bupkes.

Peace,
Paul


If not for polls, there would be no comeback gal Hillary.

For that matter, there would be no comeback kid Bill.. and then where would we be? Bush'92? Dole'96?

So let's all be grateful for all the polls.

Wow. There are going to be some very disappointed media minions if these polls don't show a bittergate impact for Obama, and I mean soon.

Come on, TPM. Stop playing this game.

Last week, the much-vaunted G. Terry Madonna offered the following pearl of wisdom:

In the short run, Obama's words are likely to do serious damage to his campaign in Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania working class voters constitute about 40 percent of the Democratic vote. Obama's claim to understand and to identify with them has been dealt a serious blow after a largely successful two week surge in the state. The Clinton campaign is already capitalizing on the controversy. It may be enough to propel her to that big victory that seemed so unlikely only a few days ago.


There's a problem when pollsters also become pundits; they face an almost-irresistible temptation to interpret their polling data in a manner that bears out their predictions. Madonna is certainly enjoying his few weeks of fame - he's become an almost inescapable presence in the national media, the geat sage of the Keystone State, the Oracle of Lancaster. And to be sure, he's a very smart guy, who's forgotten more about Pennsylvania politics than I'll ever know.

But in this case, he made a prediction - that Obama's comments demonstrated his "feet of clay," and put him in line with three previous prominent candidates whose verbal miscues caused or contributed to their losses. Now he's faced with an inconvenient fact. We've had six polls come out in the past two days taken entirely or partially after news of the comments broke. Not only do they not show any discernable shift in the past week, but those polls whose sample straddled the comments didn't show any significant difference from the first days of the sample to the last. And national tracking polls aren't picking up a shift, either. But what's really embarassing for Madonna is that his own poll shows the race tightening.

So instead of limiting himself to what his data actually show, Madonna launches himself into the realm of airy speculation:

Franklin & Marshall pollster G. Terry Madonna agreed that the "bitter" fallout may still be shaping the race.
"The question is if [Clinton] has stopped Obama's surge permanently," said Madonna. "With the new commercial and the San Francisco statements, can she push the lead back to double digits?"


He may well be right. But he's not speaking as a pollster, but as a pundit. And here's the real rub. Polls show swings. That's the nature of polling. At some point in the next week, we can be absolutely certain that one or more polls will show a wider margin for Hillary in the latest sample than in the previous one. That's made all the more probable by the apparent fact that Obama is tapping out among undecided voters - I expect the polling to remain fairly steady from here to election day, without the dramatic gains of the past month. In fact, since most of the undecideds seem to be leaning toward Hillary, as more of them make up their minds, the margin will widen again. All Madonna has to do (and he damn well knows this) is stall for time. When a subsequent round of polling shows the inevitable variation and the probable last-minute widening - a shift that I, among others, have been predicting for weeks - he can attribute it to the comments, and we'll have another NAFTA-like narrative. But it wasn't NAFTA that sunk Obama in Ohio - it was that he'd won over the undecideds and uncommitteds, and was unable to chip away at Hillary's bedrock support. And the same thing's playing out now in Pennsylvania.

If this issue was making a difference, we'd be seeing it by now. Not in huge shifts, but pollsters would be reporting that their Sunday, Monday and Tuesday samples showed a subtle shift. They'd report it because it would garner them attention and headlines, and they love that. But the only polling operation to definitively break out those numbers - Quinnipiac - specifically said it had seen no such shift. And the polls taken exclusively over those days also show no shift. So the graceful thing for Madonna to do would be to say: "The voters surprised me - perhaps we'll see a shift in the future, but for now, it looks like the remarks haven't impacted the race." But that would mean admitting he'd be wrong. Don't hold your breath.

A very good point. Well said.

user-pic

Am I out of touch or inattentive?
After Hillary's Bosnia lying was exposed, did the polling companies and media follow up for days afterward with specific questions about that or with editorializing about what that exposure meant in terms of poll responses? Did pollsters actually introduce specific poll questions about the Bosnia flap? If that happened, I missed it, and will be happy to be informed......anyone?

Whatever, it looks like the media and/or the polling companies are coordinating some sort of big push poll, repeatedly trying to implant a negative message to blunt Obama's positive appeal.

Oh well, maybe the media and pollsters are just rapt watching Obama's mastery in this long race. He stubs a toe, but, by God, he doesn't even lose stride, he uses it all as opportunity to pivot and sweep himself and his message into an even better place around the next bend.

user-pic

These polls are BULLSHIT!!!!! Hillary will WIN Pennsylvania. BY MORE THEN 40 POINTS!!! Barack HUSSEIN Obama will not stop her!!! He is a lier, a phony, unpatriotic, won't wear a lapel pin, Michelle is a COMMIE, won't sing patriotic songs, elitist, flag burner, Rezko, mean to Hillary, not his turn, and INNNNNNEEEEXXXXXPPPEERRRRIEEEENNNNCCCCCEEEDDD!!!!!!

Hillary has climbed the mountain. She is made out of gold. God bless Hillary Clinton!!!!

CLINTON-LIEBERMAN '08!!!!!!

Why is PA so seemingly different from other states? Is it that hard to poll there? Seems to me in other states the polls were within 5 points of eachother and agreed upon the general direction of movement. This is insane.

The best I can figure is it's in the single digits. Except for the gold standard SUSA poll which says it's not...geez.

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address