« Axelrod: It's "Kind Of Stunning" That Penn No Longer Is Hillary's Guru | Home | Obama: I Traveled To Pakistan In College »
For Once, No Politics On Hillary Campaign Conference Call
The daily Clinton campaign conference call, usually consisting of the daily slam against Obama followed by a freewheeling Q and A, took an unusual form this morning.
Instead, the call was purely about policy, focusing exclusively on questions about Hillary's new initiative on breast-cancer awareness — perhaps because the campaign is determined not to have to answer any more questions about Mark Penn's departure.
For those who want to listen, here it is:
Advertisement















Thank you for providing a summary of the audio of the conference call. I'm deaf so it's hard for me to follow along with the audio, so thank you again for summarizing the conference call.
April 7, 2008 1:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Clinton Wants Bush To Boycott Olympics".
Now that is leadership!
April 7, 2008 1:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
NONSENSE!
The Clintons' Daily Follies didn't piss on Obama because ERIC was on the line insted of Greg!
Or is it the other way around - that's why Eric took the call.
Either way...Let's end the Clintons NOW
ERIC FOR EDITOR!
April 7, 2008 1:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
For some reason this terrifies me.
April 7, 2008 1:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Are the early conf calls available online? Seems like this is the first I've seen recorded. Wondering why that is...
April 7, 2008 1:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Policy only?
Is this, yet again, the "beginning of the end?"
April 7, 2008 1:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well don't change your bets anytime soon.
April 7, 2008 1:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why would Hillary engage in politics? Oh, she's a politician, and it's a political campaign. Never mind.
April 7, 2008 2:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
You also didn't mention that Mark Penn was on this conference call. Marc Ambinder reports that Mark Penn was on the conference call this morning:
April 7, 2008 2:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Really? WTF? Why would you leave out such an important detail? C'mon, guys. I've never bought into the whole Greg/Eric pro-Clinton bias in the reporting here, but this omission says a lot.
April 7, 2008 2:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, this was amazing to me that they'd left this detail out.
April 7, 2008 2:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
perhaps because the campaign is determined not to have to answer any more questions about Mark Penn's departure.
of the fact that he was on the call. Nice catch flufferwink!
April 7, 2008 3:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Eric,
This post is extremely misleading. At 2008Central.net, we've been maintaining recording the campaign conference calls for
However, the campaigns do on occasion hold policy only calls. Today's call was a policy call and was very similar in format and tone to previous policy calls. Anyone paying attention would know this.
Your suggestion that today's call was different because of the Penn situation is flatly incorrect. That said, the fact that the campaign didn't hold its daily call "to discuss the state of the race" is likely the due to a desire to avoid questions about Penn.
Let's try and keep things accurate though and not blur any lines...
April 7, 2008 5:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Flufferwink and others that are confused,
Penn was not on the call that Eric from TPM is referring to in this poorly described post. The call that Flufferwink was referring to is an internal call.
Of course, the fact that Penn was on a high level call is still worth noting. But, accuracy and understanding of what's actually going on is a critical starting point...
April 7, 2008 5:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
I didn't bother listening to the tape that Eric so kindly posted but perhaps I should have
Olbermann says that MARK PENN was on the call.
Funny how Eric omitted that little factoid
I DENOUNCE AND REJECT Eric Kleefeld and take back my endorsement of his candidacy for TPMElectClinton Central
April 7, 2008 8:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
John McCSF,
Stop repeating factually incorrect statements, especially when it's clear that you haven't even done a minimal amount of effort to ensure the accuracy of your remarks (like reading the comment right above the one you posted).
I've already clarified above, but I'll do it again:
Penn was NOT on the call that Eric posted about. He was however on an internal campaign strategy call.
Honestly, if people can't even get the facts straight on this basic situation, I'm concerned...
April 7, 2008 9:15 PM | Reply | Permalink