Clinton: My Dad Taught Me How To Shoot
Hillary Clinton further seized on the opening provided by Barack Obama's "bitter" remarks, telling a crowd in Indiana that she herself is no stranger to guns.
"You know, my dad took me out behind the cottage that my grandfather built on a little lake called Lake Winola outside of Scranton and taught be how to shoot when I was a little girl," said Clinton.
"You know, some people now continue to teach their children and their grandchildren. It's part of culture. It's part of a way of life. People enjoy hunting and shooting because it's an important part of who they are. Not because they are bitter."
She later added, however, that she is not herself an expert with firearms: "As I told you, my dad taught me how to shoot behind our cottage. I have gone hunting. I am not a hunter. But I have gone hunting."

OH FOR GOD'S SAKE!!
That's all I have to say about that.
April 12, 2008 10:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed. Absolutely.
April 12, 2008 11:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
dittoheads unite.
April 13, 2008 10:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, this solves the "Who Shot Vince Foster?" mystery.
April 13, 2008 4:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks, that gave me a good laugh.
April 13, 2008 7:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yep.
April 12, 2008 11:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
I HEART Theda Skocpol Featured prominently in the thesis I'll never finish.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/188673.php
April 13, 2008 11:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
My thought, before I read yours, was, "good heavens." I have gone from tremendous respect to unhealthy hatred of Senator Clinton in the course of a couple of months. I've grown weary of this part of the process. We need to attack John McCain as the horrible president he would be.
April 13, 2008 12:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed, but I just had to jump in here because 450 comments must be some kind of record. But what does it say that there are 450 comments to an absolutely insignificant quote from a stump speech?
April 13, 2008 11:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed, but I just had to jump in here because 450 comments must be some kind of record. Still, what does it say that there are 450 comments to an absolutely insignificant quote from a stump speech?
April 13, 2008 11:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed, but I just had to jump in here because 450 comments must be some kind of record. But what does it say that there are 450 comments to an absolutely insignificant quote from a stump speech?
April 13, 2008 11:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Which is to say:
Blah blah blah.. pander, clap clap point point, blah blah.
April 13, 2008 4:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
You've captured her perfectly :)
April 13, 2008 8:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
When I was reading the title, I initially thought basketball before guns.
Funny either way, because I can't picture it.
April 13, 2008 5:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
When the house voted to condemn MoveOn.org, Senator Clinton was one of the FEW democrats who voted AGAINST the condemnation.
Barack Obama DID NOT VOTE.
A few months later, MoveOn.org endorsed Obama for president.
April 13, 2008 10:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
and that just goes to show that liberal vote against their own self interest.
April 13, 2008 10:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
My granfather taught me how to shoot. AND I LOVED IT. NRA comepetition in rifle, skeet shooting, killing birds and other sentient creatures.
Three things he said were required for a boy to grow up to be a man:
1. Learn to hunt
2. Learn to fish
3. Learn to play baseball
Guess that explains our Spine of Steel's problem
April 13, 2008 11:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
nice try, tpm, to take the spotlight off the empty suit's elitist comments. we're not forgetting one bit.
April 13, 2008 11:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
If those comments were elitist, then John Edwards' whole campaign was elitist. Were you condemning Edwards back in the day?
Thought not.
April 13, 2008 12:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
ugh, don't change the subject. it is obama we're discussing here. edwards had promise - unfortunately, millions are falling for the empty suit. shame.
April 13, 2008 8:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
They sure aren't bitter around the trough where the 10 million dollar Clintons and their crowd feed.
But 81% of Americans have had it with the same old BushClinton crap
April 13, 2008 12:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
RuhROH
While The Working Class Hero with the Spine of Steel, Ready on Day 1 to kill little critters was regaling America with tales of her hardscrabble upbringing at the cottage by the lake
Pennsylvania Times-Tribune (Scranton) endorsed Obama
http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/stateupdates/gGBp52
If I were him, I'd thrash that woman on Tuesday night. Show just how out of touch she is with our anger and our bitterness over her war, her corruptions, the BushClintonBush league governance we have endured for nearly two decades
If Democrats want an experience Bushville con artist, vote for someone who is REALLY ready, truly experienced..Just vote for McCain this fall
April 13, 2008 1:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for posting this endorsement, John. I put the link on Hillary Clinton's own website so they can rejoice over there too. lol
Yes We Can.
April 13, 2008 1:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
HAHAHAHAHA......
Hillary Clinton, gun enthusiast. This woman is shameless.
April 12, 2008 10:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Did she shoot varmints? Obama clearly made a gaffe. Unfortunately it was the worst kind of gaffe. He screwed up by telling the truth! Is he ready for prime time?
April 12, 2008 10:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
present
April 13, 2008 10:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
excuse me? Her father teaching her how to shoot makes her shameless? Maybe she really does like and respect the people she grew up around. I have gun owning friends and I like them too. My step father taught me how to shoot. I have never hunted in my life and I am in favor of gun control just like Clinton is.
You really should stop thinking of people in easily assignable boxes. Remember Clinton grew up with a republican father from Scranton PA.
April 13, 2008 10:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
A working class hero is something to be
You know, my dad took me out behind the cottage that my grandfather built on a little lake called Lake Winola outside of Scranton and taught be how to shoot when I was a little girl," said Clinton.
A little summer home. My my..
I learned on the levees and borrow pits on the Mississippi River. We didn't have a summer cottage
Take that you elitist harpy!
April 13, 2008 11:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
John you hit it on the head. I live in MS and own guns and have lots of friends who's greatest passion in the world is deer and turkey hunting. None of them have a summer cottage. It's not the fact that she learned to shoot guns as a young child that offends me but the fact that she holds up this experience as giving her any connection to people who really care about hunting and guns. She is so fake. I've been watching Hillary for years now and though I still have respect for her and the work she has done I have no idea who she really is.
As far as what Barack said I took to mean that when people are scared and under stress they cling to what gives them comfort. The only thing wrong with this is that it's not limited to people who live in small towns, we all do it. Like Barack said it's a natural reaction. I know I pray more when I'm scared.
April 14, 2008 9:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes vote for me because I know how to shoot a gun just like you. Don't pay attention to the trade deals my husband is working on. Don't pay attention to the fact that I'm a liar. Don't pay attention to the fact that I'm itching to go to war with Iran. Just remeber I know how to shoot a gun. Because the president needs to know how to shoot a gun.
April 12, 2008 10:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
She's not itching to go to war with Iran. Can we dispense with the hyperbole? She's simply the absolute worst kind of Democrat - one who puts on a right-wing posture because she doesn't know how to fight for her beliefs out in the open.
If she pulls this out, I'll vote for her. But I'll state hate her guts.
April 12, 2008 11:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
You take the words out of my mouth.
April 12, 2008 11:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
There is nothing exclusively right-wing about respecting the 2nd amendment of the Constitution. Private ownership of guns is as American as apple pie. It has been to the detriment of the Democratic party that they have often been tarred with wanting to ban private ownership of guns.
Matthew Weaver
http://www.TheProblemWithObama.com
April 12, 2008 11:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nice strawman, but your time out out of the service has made you rusty and you missed the target.
The right-wing position being that of the empire and all the wars that we have been getting in lately.
Can you say "Hillary voted for the AUMF on Iraq, and got awfully close to doing just the same for Iran", or does it hurt too much?
Bonus points for an improved avatar.
April 12, 2008 11:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think you error in judging her by her original vote on Iraq. Consider that nearly all sitting Senators voting for this. Obama's only claim is that he was not there. Otherwise, he'd likely have voted the same.
What really matters is that all of them--Clinton, McCain, AND Obama--have voted for funding every time since.
Now, the question is who is most credible and honest about getting us out honorably. In my opinion this is Clinton or McCain. Obama's own staff claim his current plans are not reflective of what he'd do. He's a novice and like Bush will need to either learn on the job or defer to someone in his administration. Who might be Obama's Cheney?
Matthew
http://www.TheIndependentView.com
April 12, 2008 11:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Somehow, you seem to think arguing "she ran off the cliff because everyone else did" is worthy of a pass.
I sat through the congressional hearings prior to the vote. It was painful and pathetic. Not a single person who got up and said "We need to do this for 9-11" deserves a pass.
Leadership should happen every moment, and she was running with the crowd when that chance came. This is not about which restaurant to eat at - this is about thousands and thousands of human lives lost to ego and fearful voting.
SHAME ON AMERICA.
See you in November.
April 12, 2008 11:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just saw this. I myself sat through the Iran-Contra hearings as a grad student. Also the later debates on funding groups in Central America. Very informative.
Still, yes, it would be nice to hold everyone accountable for that first vote, but even doing so doesn't change the fact that all three candidates since have voted to continue funding the war. I really think Congress should have held a tighter line on funding a cessation of hostilities and fund relocation of troops. It is still scandalous that Osama is loose and Afghanistan uncontrolled. Congress has been gutless which is why they have an even lower approval rating than Bush.
Matthew
http://www.TheIndependentView.com
April 13, 2008 12:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
And, your approval rating is nil.
April 13, 2008 12:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Was just reading your Obama hate site and its saner compatriot (theindependentview). Its stunning how many of the issues you care about go down the crapper with a McCain presidency. I expected you to be for the criminalization of abortion or atleast hold some other fringe right wing views, but you seem to be in line with most Democrats. Sure would be easier to win an election without you guys voting for McCain. :)
April 12, 2008 11:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Half of the democrats and one GOP senator voted against the AUMF.
April 13, 2008 1:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wrong. Twenty three Democratic senators voted no.
April 13, 2008 4:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think the point is that an irrational attachment to ABSOLUTE gun rights is the reason many rural folk have voted against their economic interests. Flogging 'cultural' issues has allowed the Republican party to push their pro-aristocracy agenda to the detriment of the very people who vote for them.
April 12, 2008 11:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
She didn't say like 'you'. She said like 'some people' which was IMO an unfortunate choice of words. It's usually used in a straw man argument as in 'SOME PEOPLE think thus and so but WE know better'.
Not to mention, her ultimate redneck woman face slips a little when she mentioned their 'cottage' instead of their 'cabin'.
If I were her foot, I would run away anytime she picks up a firearm. Just sayin'
April 13, 2008 1:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
My family is from the Wilkes-Barre/Scranton area of PA. We called the little lake house my grandparents built "The Cottage". I think "cottage" is just a local colloquialism for a summer home in those parts of PA. However, not only did we not have an indoor shower, but there wasn't even an indoor toilet until sometime in the '90's. Sounds like Hillary's family cottage was a bit more upscale than ours.
BTW - my grandfather was a coal miner, so there was a time when working class people (not rednecks) could manage to have a little place for recreation and the grandkids.
The above is not to support Clinton. I think the comments Obama made in Indiana wrt the bitterness folks in PA, etc. feel is right on the money. I'm 55 years old & my family moved to NJ when I was an infant because of the lack of economic opportunity in PA. And, it has never recovered even half a century later; it has only gotten worse. It is heartbreaking for the kin we left behind. With all the material benefits I've achieved via education and opportunity afforded me in NJ, I feel bitter about how the folks "up home" in PA have left to rot in spite to politicians promises.
April 13, 2008 2:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
She said cottage to avoid saying summer house. Her father was a textile mill owner, not a laborer in the mill, and back in those days (hard to believe now but true, and real working people in PA can remember this), many working class families actually were able to own things like summer cottages and cabins on lakes. So that's the connection she wants to make. But the very fact that the Rodhams didn't like in PA but summered there tells you the real story. I'm not saying they had the equivalent of the Vanderbilt's summer home in Newport. But this wasn't a two room hut.
April 13, 2008 4:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
She has absolutely no shame.
April 12, 2008 11:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
LOL...I'm so in love with your avatar.
April 12, 2008 11:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nice avatar.
April 13, 2008 12:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
I truly don't get it. What's so funny and nice about this avatar??
I know it makes fun of Marginal, but it reminds me too much of a certain hate group. I feel kind of nauseated by it...
April 13, 2008 8:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
"I feel kind of nauseated by it..."
Some people are sickened by hoods. I'm sickened by the heads underneath them.
April 13, 2008 9:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Leroy,
I appreciate your taking the time to respond.
It isn't hoods per se that nauseate me. I have seen hoods unrelated to the KKK many a time (not that I applaud them either):
http://images.google.com/images?gbv=2&hl=en&q=semana+santa&btnG=Search+Images
What troubles me is what the hood you are wearing echoes. I do agree with your statement that it isn't the hoods per se what is sickening, but "the heads underneath them."
I also understand that it isn't swastikas or nooses that are sickening per se; nonetheless, I can't help but to feel very uncomfortable around them.
I am curious as to what your goal was in choosing this avatar. Maybe you are trying to point out that Marginal Player is a shady character; but I bet we all knew that already.
I am also aware that I could very well be misinterpreting your meaning.
Thanks again.
April 13, 2008 9:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm more nauseated by a hater like Weaver having a platform on this forum to pimp his Aryan Nation website. Why?
April 13, 2008 1:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good grief. Maybe Obama should "return fire" by saying he's spent many an afternoon baking cookies.
April 12, 2008 11:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Its not entirely clear to me why she had to dig her opportunistic claws into this gaffe. I mean, all she does is piss off Obama supporters and harden her supporters' resistance to Obama. She didn't have to flog this mess because the giggly high schoolers (also known as the media in the United States) will be all over it.
This just seems like a situation where she has a slim shot at gaining ground, but a larger shot at shooting hers (or Obamas) chances in the general election.
April 12, 2008 11:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly my thougths.
I was just disappointed in Hillary Clinton, now i feel resentful and angry toward her.
Maybe Nader has a chance after all (if Hillary is nominated)
April 13, 2008 7:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
The media's driven toward conflict. If there's no spat, they lose interest within a day. By going for blood on this, Clinton's making sure that this gets a lot of coverage. She might even be hoping it lasts into the PA primaries. I don't think it will go quite that long, though.
April 13, 2008 10:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Karen Hughes and Karl Rove will be back dressed like Elmer Fudd for Halloween again to show their support for Hillary the Hunter instead of John Kerry this time. Hillary Clinton, you're no Dick Cheney-at least he didn't shoot himself.
April 13, 2008 8:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh Jeebus! I am frightened. If she somehow is able to pull off the primary, THE SCARY REPUBLICANS ARE GOING TO USE THIS AGAINST HER IN THE GENERAL ELECTION.
Think Vince Foster! Those two dots now have a line!
Ahhhhhhhhh! I am freaking out!
April 12, 2008 11:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not only was she pinned down by sniper fire, she actually shot back!
April 12, 2008 11:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Perfect.
April 12, 2008 11:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Now when she shoots back, MSM whines she's "going negative."
April 13, 2008 2:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
LeroyS, your avatar made me spit my coffee! It was worth it.
April 12, 2008 11:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Eric left out the bit about how Clinton's pandering got her in trouble:
April 12, 2008 11:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Shameless pandering is a risky business. You know, by the end of this primary, she might be the MOST REVILED figure in America. Atleast Bush has Republicans who like him. Hillary will have both Republicans and healthy dollop of Democrats who hate her living guts.
Then again, that might not mean much. I've never had to like my politicians to vote for them.
April 12, 2008 11:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary's response:
"From my cold dead hand!!!"
Hey, somebody's gotta do it now that Moses can't hold the AR-15 heroically aloft.
April 12, 2008 11:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Seizing the moment.
She will win PA by 20.
April 12, 2008 11:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
To what end? If she wins the nomination because of either flogging this gaffe or because of running on a quasi 'Obama-isn't-American' theme, she'll lose a lot of the wine track Democrats. You know, people who Bill Clinton said don't need a president. These people can afford to vote for McCain out of petulance. This is a wonderful lose-lose moment for the party.
p.s: Yeah, Obama's really making me wonder if he's ready for prime time. Wonderful campaign, idiot candidate. The exact opposite of the Clinton campaign.
April 12, 2008 11:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Stilton_Cheddar,
I really couldn't agree more: Obama's really making me wonder if he's ready for prime time. Wonderful campaign, idiot candidate. The exact opposite of the Clinton campaign.
I am really shocked with how bad much of the Clinton campaign has been managed. I still watch each morning to see if Penn has finally been fired. While I suspect that Clinton might see some lingering value in his participation, I personally think the costs to her campaign are too high.
Matthew
http://www.TheProblemWithObama.com
April 12, 2008 11:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
I hope you'll consider re-thinking parts of your post here (http://www.theproblemwithobama.com/default_topic.aspx?id=655). As one of the few people on this site who actually is black, I find this post rather appalling and disheartening.
The sad truth is that many of us grew up with parents and grandparents who lived through segregation and experienced the most heinous kinds of discrimination. The anger may subside for a majority of the time, but it lingers and occasionally expresses itself. Now, if a majority of Rev. Wright's sermons contained the kind of incendiary language you cite, I'd understand your beef. But at some point you need to understand that black folk who are in their 50s or older have seen the kind of hatred you couldn't imagine in your worst nightmares. That this anger expresses itself doesn't mean it is indicative of them. My parents always taught me to turn the other cheek, but they too had instances where they didn't follow their own advice.
Trying to make political hay out of Rev. Wright is painful to watch. If you genuinely think Rev. Wright is a racist and un-American figure, fine. But if you're flogging his comments solely to push your support of Clinton, please reconsider the post cited above.
My hopes aren't high, but people surprise me.
April 13, 2008 12:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Stilton_Cheddar,
Please email me at matthew@theproblemwithobama.com so that we can discuss.
Thank you,
Matthew
April 13, 2008 12:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
I still say 25-30%. The longer Obama holds out on apologizing, the better for Clinton. Obama is proving his poor character through his own statements. I hope that folks are finally ready to start holding him accountable and looking more seriously at electability.
Matthew
http://www.TheProblemWithObama.com
April 12, 2008 11:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Shouldn't you add a zero, just to me on the safe side? 200% seems so much more believable.
April 12, 2008 11:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, if she takes Pennsylvania with 60%, she only needs to take 56% of the last 713 delegates out there, combining the pledged and superdelegates.
April 13, 2008 12:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
On a lighter note, Ted Nugent's head just exploded.
April 12, 2008 11:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think that Hillary learned to shoot guns in Bosnia.
It wasn't Dad that taught her, it was the Irish Peace Delegation. Or McCain.
Whichever the voters would rather hear.
April 12, 2008 11:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Note to Obama: Don't say anything true, John Hillary McClinton will spin it!
April 12, 2008 11:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
It does give her slightly more credibility on the topic, even though it was only from childhood. It is humanizing and shows her family history. Consider that Obama is trying to convince folks he's not out to ban guns even though that has previously been his stated position.
Oh, that's right, to be clear, he first wanted to ban all guns, then relented to wanting to only ban them from inner cities. As I originally wrote back on March 7: While Obama now says guns may be fine from some folks, he previously wrote expressing support for the complete ban on the manufacture, sale, and possession of handguns. This wasn't some youthful statement but one just 12 short years ago in race for an Illinois state senate seat. Now, he instead calls for limits. What might these be? Oh, yes, limit purchases to one gun per month, no use of guns in self-defense, no guns in cities. More correctly, he is quoted in 2007 as wanting to ban guns from inner cities, which with no twisting whatsoever means that as inner cities are majority African-American, he wants to ban African-Americans from owning and possessing handguns. Not the suburbs, not in rural areas, no, just in the inner cities.
Yes, Clinton has the opportunity to set a much more reasonable approach to guns. Having grown up mostly in the Pacific Northwest and Alaska, having had guns throughout my youth, even shooting competitively in high school (we had a target range in the high school gym), and some experience with hunting, and some limited gun ownership as an adult, I absolutely support private possession of guns. It is reasonable to ban assault weapons and associated ammunition, bar guns from felons and mentally impaired, but I'd oppose anything further. I look forward to seeing the Supreme Court overthrowing DC's ban on guns. All citizens, regardless of their location of residency, should have equal, unfettered access and right to bear arms.
I write all of this detail to explain where I stand and my recognition that Clinton might take a narrower view. Which is fine as I don't expect to support every one of her positions and policies. Any change she might propose will require Congressional action and be subject to court review. While the same is true of anything Obama might propose, the fact that he is on past record advocating a complete ban on guns is a bit too much.
Matthew
http://www.TheProblemWithObama.com
April 12, 2008 11:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
You know, you could at least have the grace to be brief. Maybe direct people to a fascinating post on the subject on your website?
That kind of scroll trolling is not very considerate in this format.
April 12, 2008 11:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
weaver's compulsive verbosity IS EXCELLENT NEWS!! FOR HILLARY!!!
April 12, 2008 11:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow. You graced Weaver with your presence?
I am awed.
April 12, 2008 11:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow! You've written something new!
Matthew
April 12, 2008 11:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Matthew Weaver, you're still crazy, but those kids are crazy cute.
April 13, 2008 8:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow. Just checked out your website. You sure do have a vendetta against Obama. I ceraintly hate Hillary's guts, but I'd never in a million years call her racist, corrupt or impugn the ends towards which she's fighting. Lord knows there's enough pieces from her public with which to construct the ugly visage you've created of Obama. Its sad.
p.s: The good news is that if McCain wins, the Republicans will own two quagmires by the time 2012 rolls around - Iraq AND the economy.
April 12, 2008 11:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Too many WOWs on this thread.
April 12, 2008 11:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
WOW!
April 13, 2008 1:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
Iraq, Iran and the Economy . . . And these are just a superset of the endemic problem!
April 13, 2008 10:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Make that Subset . . .
April 13, 2008 10:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Saw this one coming. It wasn't a question of if she'd overreach, but when and how.
I didn't think she'd do it so comically, though.
Leno and Letterman now have half their monologues written, and it won't be about Obama.
April 12, 2008 11:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Or how about this quote from the same article:
Quote: "Clinton touted her husband's record on gun control during his administration, and said "there is not a contradiction between protecting Second Amendment rights" and the effort to reduce crime."
Did she explain how reducing crime might've spared that young man being paralyzed? Or did she just assume that a crime must've been in progress when the young man was hit by a gunshot?
April 12, 2008 11:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Of course, Obama didn't suggest people use guns because they're "bitter." He said they've turned to voting for gun rights and on personal religious issues because they've lost faith the government will ever address their economic concerns. But, of course, it's politics, so Hillary's milking it for all it's worth, twisting the words to do the most harm. Heck, she's just folks, just like them. She knows how to shoot a gun. Huckabee cooked up squirrel and Romney hunted varmints. And George Bush, gosh, well he goes to his ranch and clears brush. Sweet lord, I'm hoping the good folks of PA are as sick of the false folksiness as I am.
Also, isn't this a play right out of Rove's handbook? Obama is closer to these people in terms of life experience than either Clinton or McCain, so they turn that strength into a weakness by suggesting he's snooty and condescending (or that u- word...). There is no shame. Absolutely none.
I am sorry Obama apologized today. It was unnecessary, especially after his strong response last night.
April 12, 2008 11:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Don't get too worried, he has not yet apologized. He only says he regrets... That's not an apology.
Matthew
http://www.TheProblemWithObama.com
April 12, 2008 11:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Matthew, since you are so angry about this guy, I thought I would share some of the great insight you are so careful to withhold from all of us. I accused you of sounding like a broken record the other day, and I realized why this might be:
April 12, 2008 11:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for the plug.
BTW, and to Stilton_Cheddar's comment as well, I am not by nature an angry person and I do not have a vendetta against Obama. I do support Clinton and, if necessary, will support McCain. As I oppose Obama I do not see much need here to post much positive about him, what there is is far outweighed by the challenges I do write about.
Matthew
http://www.TheProblemWithObama.com
April 13, 2008 12:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's a little disingenuous, no? You've called him racist and corrupt. Two things, if true, are worth being angry about.
April 13, 2008 12:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
No agenda?
You have two websites against the guy. If that is not an agenda, I need a language overhaul.
Either that or my parody radar is totally defunct.
April 13, 2008 12:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oops. Vendetta was the word of choice. Point stands.
As for the plug... your comprehension level must be much lower than I have given you credit for.
It would be great if you could actually apply thought to the discussion rather than regurgitating the same shit over and over.
April 13, 2008 12:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
My my my, Somewhere here Weaver says he has a graduate degree. You'd think he'd know -- from graduate level work -- that you don't make gneralized statements without facts to back them up. He writes grammatically, we have to give him that. But this one flunks for research, content and argument. C+ at best here, and that would be for if it had been written by a highschool sophomore.
April 13, 2008 4:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
"He said they've turned to voting for gun rights and on personal religious issues because they've lost faith the government will ever address their economic concerns."
That's a nice, concise way of putting it. I think Obama's a good speaker but at times he reverts to being college professor (or lecturer, to satisfy the Hillbots) and tries to make very large points that get diced up by the MSM and misunderstood by voters unaware of a the larger scope of the statements.
April 13, 2008 12:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Aaargh!
April 12, 2008 11:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
My sentiments exactly.
"Clinton is the President you can do shots with."
Shots of bullshit, friend. Enjoy, I'll be drinking 'round the corner with the true non-elites.
April 12, 2008 11:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Clinton stood by the bar and took a shot of Crown Royal whiskey. She took one sip of the shot, then another small sip, then a few seconds later threw her head back and finished off the whole thing.
Clinton later sat down at a table and enjoyed some pizza and beer, and called over Mayor Tom McDermott of Hammond, Ind., to come join the table.
"Every time I get around you we start drinking, senator," the mayor exclaimed.
Clinton nodded and raised her glass.
"It's Saturday night, though, Tom," she said."
I am drinking Crown too.
Clinton is the President you can do shots with.
April 12, 2008 11:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
A better way of putting it: Clinton is the President that drives you to drink.
April 12, 2008 11:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wait a minute. There's pictures of her drinking? And she admits to shooting guns?
Hell, her transformation into Dick Cheney is complete. Feel the power of the Dark Side.
What ever will young Jedi Obama-wan Kenobi do now?
Stay tuned... I sense the Force has a happy ending here. While Cliton...I mean Darth Pander...has had a few laughs the last few days, there is a trickle that is quickly becoming a raging river of blowback.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/188673.php
...and it's just the start.
April 13, 2008 2:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
She kinda shot herself in the feet!
Obama's remarks she intentionally mis-characterized becomes a Bosnia moment.
Team Clinton Delusional Campaign continues......
April 12, 2008 11:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Cue footage of Kerry in the hunting outfit with the dead swan.
April 12, 2008 11:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
There is a great picture of her doing shots at the huffington er obama post.
April 12, 2008 11:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yep, the night life can do that for ya!
She seem to have adapted real well!
Yes, 3:00 a.m. is close.
April 12, 2008 11:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Team Clinton Delusional Campaign continues......
April 12, 2008 11:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow, just what I want in the next President. A two fisted drinker answering the *red phone* at 3a.m. after a day of shooting innocent animals.
April 13, 2008 1:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just to complete the imagery, my wife said she was watching the local news tonight and noticed Clinton was playing "Small Town" by Mellencamp at her rally today.
April 12, 2008 11:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lmao HRC is the person you can do shots with? OMG this is beyond comedy wow what a total pander unreal lmao. She finally has her "issue" and she takes it on by trying to transform herself into a hard drinking gun toting blue collar gal thats gets it...hell I dunno maybe duck hunting at 3am in rural Scranton while avoiding sniper fire might turn out to be her "log cabin"...
April 12, 2008 11:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
So Hillary... Skoal or Copenhagen?
April 12, 2008 11:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
This comment hit home for me.
I just realized that I am the the type of person Hillary is desperately trying to connect with.
Now, I don't waste my money on that high-class Skoal or Copenhagen, nothing but generic Grizzly for me. However, I'm a farmer (part-time), a gun owner, a drinker, and many of those other things that rural PA residents commonly are.
Connection FAILED.
Hillary claiming to be a hunter reminds me of the many attempts by Kerry to connect with my demographic. As a Kerry supporter, I remember burying my face in my hands each time.
April 13, 2008 12:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
As a born-and-raised outdoorsman, I can't begin to explain to the Hillary-loving latte libs around here how badly this ridiculous ploy will bomb among the Cabela's crowd.
April 13, 2008 10:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
I guess we have to believe she shot guns with her father...since there is no video tape. Now can we get back to talking about issues that really matter to voters. And this person is presidential?
April 12, 2008 11:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
what a ho!
guess she feels safe with this whooper cause she knows for sure there is no vidio.
are people really this stupid in america?
i know there are some here, but will the voters really believe this stuff?
well...bright side is a few more weeks and the clintons are finished in politics for good!
no second chance for the lier and poor bill is just a joke these days in public.
the lier can divorce him and come out of the closet.
ahhh fresh air!
April 12, 2008 11:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
language, please!
April 12, 2008 11:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think B.O. is the ho.
He has no connect with the people whose votes he is soliciting.
Why does he want to be president of a country he doesn't like?
April 13, 2008 10:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
While the frustration is ripe on all sides - launching epitaphs such as "ho" do not do much for the dialog.
In short - leave the shitty comments out of it.
Thanks
April 12, 2008 11:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
I know her husband's favorite shot.
A blow-job.
What?!? It's a drink.
http://www.drinknation.com/drink/Blow-Job
April 12, 2008 11:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary getting hammered:
http://bp1.blogger.com/_UQPUzwdX51o/SAGBAm9YsPI/AAAAAAAAAHU/qtpQt3Gntao/s1600-h/r-HILLARY-DRINKING-huge1.jpg
April 12, 2008 11:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
HAHAHA...
That's pretty cool. Hell, I find pictures of Bush getting hammering amusing. Probably explains why I'm amused whenever he's on the teevee.
April 12, 2008 11:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
I hope goatlife and Matthew Weaver are getting paid in cash. I sure wouldn't take a check from either the Clinton campaign nor McCain's.
April 12, 2008 11:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ok Hillary. I did not want to do this and it makes me feel kind of smarmy but you leave me no choice.
Do you not remember this:
"I suppose I could have stayed home and baked cookies and had teas.."
How do you think small town will like hearing that again? So please, please step away from the bitter bashing.
April 12, 2008 11:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, the good thing about this long march to the PA primary is that all the spin cycles are going to lead to a fun debate or two.
April 12, 2008 11:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
My wife and I were wondering what the question line-up would be. I am hoping they slam home the NAFTA/Columbia question.
People lobby when they have influence. Bill was lobbying. Why would that change should lightening strike Obama and McCain and transform them into gay lovers?
April 12, 2008 11:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Uh, yeah, right. Between the tea parties and the cookie baking.
April 12, 2008 11:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
She was just hanging out with the fellas!
April 12, 2008 11:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Clearly, he failed to teach her to shoot STRAIGHT.
April 12, 2008 11:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
All this from the woman who, while First Lady repeatedly urged Congress to "buck the gun lobby" and "regret[ted] the hold that gun advocates have in Washington."
(Actual quotes from HRC.)
What a load of crap this is.
April 12, 2008 11:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
But...but... she is fully vetted. How can this be? I thought there was no dirt on her. Oh my!?!
April 12, 2008 11:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
I must say, this is one of the more enjoyable threads I've read lately.
Not sure if I've calmed down, but it sounds like everyone has at least accepted the fact that Obama is going to win, like it or not.
April 12, 2008 11:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, maybe...
I know this will lead to the Hilltrolls dismissing me as mindlessly proBama, but-
Could someone please bury the Clinton campaign? It died awhile ago, and it is really starting to stink the place up...
I know it sounds mean, but Hillary needs to start thinking about what's going to be left of her political career if this keeps up, and Bill needs to think about what's going to be left of his speaking career if this keeps up.
April 13, 2008 12:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
You couldn't be more wrong. Every day that goes by shows Clinton to be the real deal and Obama a pretender.
This is far from over and I actually have more confidence now that Clinton will pull this off.
Obama is a mistake and I think many of his supporters realize this but out of pride refuse to budge.
So be it, I think Clinton is going to complete the Hail Mary Pass.
April 13, 2008 12:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
(Repeat after me, and rock back and forth for soothing effect)
"The nomination is coming..."
"The nomination is coming..."
"The nomination is coming..."
"The nomination is coming..."
"The nomination is coming..."
"The nomination is coming..."
"The nomination is coming..."
"The nomination is coming..."
It's ok, just don't be bitter if things don't work out ;-)
April 13, 2008 12:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Do you represent the autistic/OCD constituency?
April 13, 2008 12:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hail Mary Pass?
I love it. On that light and gentle thought, I can rest tonight.
April 13, 2008 12:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, and you still haven't figured out that those who want war heroes have a real one to vote for, the left will never vote for her, and she's saved the Republicans the trouble of suppressing the black vote. She is unelectable. All she can do is destroy the party.
April 13, 2008 4:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why does gotalife use a picture of Scalia as his avatar?
Maybe I should go straight to the source: gotalife? Why Scalia? Surely you aren't a fan... are you?
April 12, 2008 11:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
She sounds like Romney, hunting "varmints". pander, pander, pander. God, if she wins I'll be so depressed. And bitter!
April 12, 2008 11:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Any bets on how long it takes to find a quote of her saying something in contrast what she said.
April 12, 2008 11:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
upthread:
All this from the woman who, while First Lady repeatedly urged Congress to "buck the gun lobby" and "regret[ted] the hold that gun advocates have in Washington."
(Actual quotes from HRC.)
What a load of crap this is.
Posted by mayur12
April 13, 2008 12:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm sure you're right. There's probably a story she told about having been traumatized as a young girl when her grandfather took her fishing and she had to bait a hook.
April 13, 2008 12:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Any bets on how long it takes to find a quote of her saying something in contrast what she said.
Abso-frieakin-lutely.
There are scores of quotes and clips from Hillary that would kick the stool out from under her new Ted Nugent In A Pantsuit phase.
Obama's camp could serve this one to her. The question is, will they?
April 13, 2008 12:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Gun pandering? Check.
Anti-elite pandering? Check.
What's next, Hillary, getting pregnant and going on Sean Hannity's show to underscore your refusal to abort, all whilst swathed head-to-toe in a poll-tested and committee-approved American American's flag pantsuit? You forgot to bash the gays and/or Mexicans, my dear. So much for the pandering trifecta.
No self-respecting citizen, much less Democrat, should support this opportunistic ghoul. HILLARY GO AWAY.
April 13, 2008 12:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
a poll-tested and committee-approved American American's flag pantsuit?
Oh, man, what a mental image!
This is beautiful. Tweety will get the Hillary having a shot-and-a-beer into play, Letterman and Stewart will be having a field day. Colbert's gonna be in PA next week.
I hope Molly Ivins is watching all this from some afterlife I wish I believed in. Oh man, can you imagine what a real drinking and hunting gal like Molly would've done with this? Nothin' but good times ahead!!
April 13, 2008 12:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
No she shouldn't go away until she dons an Elmer Fudd outfit and poses with a gun, hunting wabbits. My guess would be that's coming next week. Then, after Pa laughs at her, she can go away. Far away. We need to have that photo for posterity however.
April 13, 2008 1:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
it's almost as if Obama is the only adult in this campaign. he's trying to speak to us about the issues as adults but he's stuck, weighed down by a clown to the left of him and a joker to his right . . .
April 13, 2008 12:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Lets raise our glasses with her and toast the next President.
President Hillary Clinton.
April 13, 2008 12:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
Of course!
Tomorrow Penn will announce she was merely showing her Annie Oakley side as she discussed the Duke and Heston.
Team Clinton Delusional Campaign continues......
April 13, 2008 12:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Does Penn model his political stylings off of Eric Cartman? Seriously, you must respect my triangulahh...
April 13, 2008 12:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Only in your weirdest dreams...in the Twilight Zone!
April 13, 2008 1:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Does anyone really want to hear her pandering like this in the GE? It's reason enough alone to vote for Obama.
April 13, 2008 12:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
as a native Chicagoan and Cubs fan, I still remember when she claimed to have secretly rooted for the Mets and the Yankees as a little girl.
April 13, 2008 12:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Meanwhile, gun lobbyists are claiming tonight that Sen. Clinton has one of the most anti-gun voting records in the Senate.
April 13, 2008 12:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hahahaha..so should we expect her to explain that she actually prefers eating game anytime soon? If that happens, we might be starting to head into Huckabee territory.
April 13, 2008 12:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
I live in East Chicago Indiana.
Snuggled between Chicago's Southside and Gary Indiana.
- The Air stinks (7th most polluted region in the country based on USEPA TRI)!
- Home of the most polluted waterway in the country - Indiana Harbor
- 1/1000 people are murdered annually
- Home of poorest census tracks in the State
- Among the highest Property taxes in the nation at 8.43%
- Schools rank last in the state based on Standardized testing
- 9% of Hispanic Males are Unemployed
- 17% of African-American Males are Unemployed.
And the Politicians are Corrupt - e.g., Democratic Politicians. There is no democracy here. Yes, Democracy can be denied, even in America.
Your Damn Right I Am Bitter.
I do not want another Politician showing up here with their promises - The Clinton came here 16 years ago with their promises. Consequently, a lot of local politicians got rich and school kids got free lunch - That's all. I WANT CHANGE. And that is Obama
April 13, 2008 12:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
Your state doesn't matter... yet.
April 13, 2008 12:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
I have to concur with Colorado Thistle that my regard for Hillary may have crossed a new threshold into disgust with this particular display of shameless spin and pandering.
April 13, 2008 12:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is like a 9 on my Romney-ometer.
April 13, 2008 1:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
I looked at the photo's over at Huffington and was quite amused. To pander to the "blue collar" worker she's appealing to stereotypes: That "blue collar" workers drink beer and shoot shots. They drown their sorrows in drink. Will she try to appeal to African American's by eating fried chicken and munching on water melon? Seriously, this is getting truly pathological. She will say and do anything to win.
April 13, 2008 12:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Does her campaign realize that guys who hang out in bars and do shots don't have much respect for women who hang out in bars and do shots?
April 13, 2008 2:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
SO. . . this week we have the Reverse Cinderella Hillary!!!
The one time elite Wellesley and Yale college girl, one time First Lady, and only yesterday mulit millionairess has been magically transformed into a hard scrabble, gun toting, beer and shot drinkin' small town gal who likes to hang out a the local bars telling Bosnian war stories.
April 13, 2008 12:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ya know, I just don't think she's going to out-McCain McCain on this one. A man who's actually shot guns on purpose. Maybe even killed some people with them, as part of combat.
I'm an Obama supporter and a Hold-the-Nose-And-Vote-For-Clinton voter, and I'm always shocked by how short-sighted Clinton's attacks on Obama are. You'd think she'd play some 3-D chess and try to hold onto the endgame (and how she'll have to beat McCain *and* account for every new persona she's adopting on her way to trying to crush Obama to secure the nomination).
Last week it was Rocky. This week it's Elmer Fudd. Next week I wonder who she'll be?
April 13, 2008 5:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hell Yeah, she's bringing back "Small Town"! Guns, the Coug, and crown royal go together like...well, pretty much like guns, the coug, and crown royal. That's a Saturday night worth MSMing about.
I think her new comic stylings are starting to win me over...
April 13, 2008 12:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Un-f***ing-believable.
Did that just happen?
Oh that just happened! Shake 'n' bake!
Next week Hillary will be giving the opening prayer at the NASCAR race.
April 13, 2008 12:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
"shake and bake..."
Hahaha, that's it! She's triangulating on the Ricky Bobby strategy:
"If your not first, your last..."
April 13, 2008 12:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
And it'll all culminate with her making out with McCain.
April 13, 2008 12:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Does Bactine have a formula I can use to wash my brain clean from the visual I just got from your post?
April 13, 2008 2:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
Fake outrage 101!!
April 13, 2008 12:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
I would have been happy if Hillary had done what I and most expected she would do, and secure the nomination. But, ah, she didn't, she hasn't, and (sorry but) --she won't. At this point its like watching a gambling addict double down, double down, double down... hand after hand after losing hand. It's just getting sad. I know Rocky wouldn't go down, but he did lose that fight you know...
Maybe Edwards should have won the nomination in 04, and Gore should have dumped Penn sooner (and recognized Lieberman as the manchurian republican he is), and maybe Bill Buckner should have blocked that line drive with his body instead of letting it go through his legs 20+years ago too...but none of that shit happened sooooooooo, now what?
April 13, 2008 12:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama's point was based on the same thesis as was explored in "What's the Matter with Kansas?" (2004) by Thomas Frank, which explored the phenonomenon of right wing populism that has turned low income democrats into right wing Republicans. It was accomplished by calling Democrats "elitists!"
The Clintons and just about every other Democratic leader have endorsed Frank's thesis and said it was important in understanding how to win back so-called Reagan Republicans. Now, Clinton attacks Obama for saying the same thing.
April 13, 2008 12:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Your right on target. That's her strategy.
April 13, 2008 12:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
"President Hillary Clinton"
Sounds like one of those "Bizarro World" episodes you would see in Superman comic books.
April 13, 2008 12:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
To be fair, I don't think the idea of Hillary Clinton as President as absurd.
April 13, 2008 1:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Shye is making it seem more and more like it would be with each passing news cycle. She seems to be on the verge of decending into and abys of self parody.
April 13, 2008 10:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sometimes the messenger is the problem. A few months ago (I don't remember the date), Tucker Carlson showed a video of Hillary pandering to the NRA. She spoke, just as she did in Indiana, about when she would go out hunting. It was Hill-arious. I have been looking for it on the internet, but cannot find it. Has anyone else seen it? or know where it can be found?
It's worth the effort. It shows how she customizes her message to different audiences - . In aggregate she panders and compromises herself.
April 13, 2008 12:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sometimes the messenger is the problem. A few months ago (I don't remember the date), Tucker Carlson showed a video of Hillary pandering to the NRA. She spoke, just as she did in Indiana, about when she would go out hunting. It was Hill-arious. I have been looking for it on the internet, but cannot find it. Has anyone else seen it? or know where it can be found?
It's worth the effort. It shows how she customizes her message to different audiences - . In aggregate she panders and compromises herself.
April 13, 2008 12:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
You are right; I saw it also. It's smart politics to court gun owners. And Clinton started this a long time ago. See my comment later about Obama courting gun owners.
The fact that Clinton started months ago and didn't wait for huge gun state Pennsylvania is a point in her favor. Not against her.
April 13, 2008 5:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Where is Sinbad when we need him?
Actually, I know where he is. He's given up on his scrappy underdog bid for veep. I just saw an ad in the paper for his upcoming show here in Oregon, at a casino at the coast ("Chinook Winds").
I am hoping that Hillary will be his opening act. She can entertain all the folks there in the casino, becoming, not unlike Celine Dion, a long-running attraction that will make her even richer than she already is today. And it will keep her the hell out of politics.
April 13, 2008 12:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, we all know that when Hillary wasn't sitting on the board of Walmart or sipping tea at Yale or raking in $100 million, she was shooting squirrels with her Pa in the woods and watching NASCAR with her cousin. That's when she wasn't speaking in tongues at church, of course.
April 13, 2008 12:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Michelle Obama worked with a Walmart affiliate at the time Obama publicly criticized HRC's old job.
She was on the board of a provider, drawing over $50,000.
She was let go after Obama's comments at the SC debate.
I wonder if she wore her full-length White Mink Coat to the board meetings?
April 13, 2008 10:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah and if you believe that Michele Obama is running against Hillary Clinton, then you probably also think that being first lady gives a person foreign policy cred.
April 13, 2008 12:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
It must have been left over mink from one of grand Hillary's hunting expeditions.
What a Calamity Jane she is!
I wonder, does Hillary hunt in her pantsuit?
April 13, 2008 1:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Hillary Clinton further seized on the opening provided by Barack Obama's "bitter" remarks, telling a crowd in Indiana that she herself is no stranger to guns."
If this utterly shameless bit of pandering hasn't eclipsed Obama's gaffe by tomorrow night, I'll be amazed. She can't resist piling on all of these nontroversies (hat tip to NCSteve), and ends up looking like the soulless political hack that she is.
A simple "asking for people to vote for them by insulting their religion is questionable politics" would have sufficed, Hillary. For someone so intimately familiar with guns, you've apparently failed to learn how not to shoot yourself in the foot.
April 13, 2008 12:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
I was going to say. Even McCain, dense old fogy that he's become, was smart enough not to take this too far.
Clinton overshot her mark by miles.
April 13, 2008 1:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.spike.com/profile/breitbart/video/2829104
Comic stylings indeed.
(Sorry, couldn't resist...)
April 13, 2008 12:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Paging Real Fake Sinbad.
April 13, 2008 1:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
SCMadden:
2 months ago I would have agreed.
But with her campaign since before the Ohio/Texas primaries the notion of HRC as prez does now seem patently absurd to me.
Sorry, but that's the way I feel.
April 13, 2008 1:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
So are we going to try to change the subject from Obama revealing his elitist, condescending attitude to Hillary's experience with a gun? Good luck with that.
April 13, 2008 1:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary already lost the democratic nomination, get over it. This is between Obama and McCain/Clinton
April 13, 2008 1:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Uh, dude. It was your candidate who's obviously rolling out some sort of lame-ass conception of a "last-ditch" attackplan:
(1) Accuse your (fellow Democratic!) opponent of insufficient patriotism and snobbish elitism;
(2) Stage an elaborate faux-marks(wo)man display that is so woefully out of touch it completely undermines step (1);
(3) ...
... ah, fuck it. I don't have the heart to complete steps 3 through 6 for ya. Here's a helpful hint: if you find/found/slavishly ingested Senator Obama's comments such that they seem to be "elitist" or "condescending" you're either any one or some combination of the following: (a) racist, (b) ignorant, (c) a closet republican, (d) ideologically blinded, (e) a donor to the Clinton Presidential Library (i.e., pending ambassador [if only in your own mind] to nation [x, y, z]), and or Grover Norquist.
Again: it was your candidate's decision to roll out this well-beyond obviously condescending gun lobby pandering within hours of attempting to make an issue out of a sane observation by her opponent. Fuck you for even implying that it's Obama's supporters attempting to change the subject: it's your own candidate's laughably out of touch strategy that's driving this discourse, nimrod. Do keep up. And do change your party affiliation already, as McCain could really use the inflated numbers to help drive his own narrative, cool?
Calvin Coolidge called, he wants his idiotic white privilege back.
April 13, 2008 1:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree. Kind of a dumb move on her part.
April 13, 2008 12:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
I just threw up in my mouth.
Hillary, you fake piece of shit...you disgust me.
April 13, 2008 1:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm waiting for the wise old owl who lives on the shore of Lake Winola to go on Fox and blow Hillary's story out of the water.
April 13, 2008 1:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
Who's "we" Otto? Are you using the "royal" we? That's kinda elitist.
Really gonna stick with that meme? Obama the elitist... yes ok, I'm really starting to get it now yes, yes, you've really got him there, now I see it! Only, one problem, since down is up, war is peace, Obama is the elitist in this field --but GWB was a down to earth beer drinking buddy, and we saw how that worked out, sooooo, maybe it's time to vote for an elitist?or not.
Combat operations continue in Iraq.
Housing and mortgage CRISIS ongoing.
Economy seriously vulnerable.
And you and every bullshit flinging, focus group forming dick head wanna fling more bullshit at it to make it go away? Deck chairs on the friggin Titanic buddy...
BTW, what's Hillary's favorite brand of beer?
April 13, 2008 1:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
I would like to take this opportunity to celebrate the return of goatlife's avatar. Thank you for time.
April 13, 2008 1:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
April 13, 2008 1:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
So clearly I'm not the only one who thinks this is dumb.
How the hell did Clinton fumble this? Even I'm willing to admit that Obama tossed her a perfect opportunity. Tossed it to her slowly.
AND SHE STILL DROPS THE BALL.
April 13, 2008 1:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
seriously?
April 13, 2008 1:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
I mean, this isn't just pandering, this is bad pandering.
We have officially crossed the line from 'silly' to 'goddamn retarded.'
April 13, 2008 1:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
She's a goddamn phony.
There really isn't any polite way to put it.
Hillary Clinton is officially a goddamn phony.
April 13, 2008 2:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, Hillary Clinton-McCain, the sniper who pinned herself down in Tuzla.
April 13, 2008 2:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
I heard she peeled out of the parking log in Fred Thompson's red pick-up swilling bud lite.
April 13, 2008 2:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Quite a feat, considering she was avoiding sniper fire at the same time.
April 13, 2008 2:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
Was she still wearing her pantsuit though?
April 13, 2008 2:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
"she shouldn't go away until she dons an Elmer Fudd outfit and poses with a gun, hunting wabbits"
OOOH! Maybe someone can talk her into going hunting on camera. Huh? Huh? CAN they?
FYI, here's what the NRA has to say on Clinton and Obama:
http://www.nrapvf.org/AtIssue/Default.aspx
Neither is flattering (surprise!), but I must say that I find their complaints against Obama especially easy to take, even as a Texan. He doesn't want to protect gun manufacturers from lawsuits? He wants to ban the sale of semi-automatics? The fiend!
'Course, he's not saying "My grandpa took me hunting," either.
April 13, 2008 2:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
This story will run through the PA Primary and into the November election. Obama continues to put his big foot in mouth. Obama's white vote drops to under 25% in PA.
Hillary 2008, if not Hillary, vote McCain 2008. Obama: THE empty suit.
April 13, 2008 2:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think you might be on to something.
This time you capitalized "THE", and that made all the difference.
We're all convinced. We're all going to vote Clinton or McCain in 2008, not THE empty suit.
Your work here is done. I think they need you back at the PNAC conference. Be sure to raise your head out of Cheney's groin from time to time to take notes. We're counting on you.
April 13, 2008 2:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Evidence on the ground in PA that Obama's comment are only being taken for blasphemy by Hillary, McCain, and a lot of the MSM, not by ordinary Pennsylvanians --
This guy is not an Obama voter, but says Obama was right about bitterness in Allentown:
http://wordpress.com/v/PgkyNxBZ
If this is the sentiment on the ground in PA, I can't imagine Hillary's shamelessly opportunistic pandering fit over this is going to do her reputation for honesty any good at all.
April 13, 2008 10:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
If Hillary is riding shotgun, who will be President?
April 13, 2008 2:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
All of you hyperventilating over this are going to feel very silly in a week or so.
This is a tempest in a teapot. There's just no "there" there.
So he made an awkward statement about something that's indisputably correct. So what, this means the Republicans are going to accuse him of being "elitist" and "out of touch"? Well DUH. Of course they are. Or if it wasn't that it would be something else. The right knows how to do nothing but insult and try to marginalize Democrats.
So they'll use that attack -- and it won't stick. I mean, in this case the attacks are just so transparently silly, and Obama's slamming back so hard so immediately, it's gonna mean nothing. I thought the Rev Wright thing might be an issue; compared to that this whole SF "bitter-gate" is utterly hollow.
By mid-May, early June at the latest, Obama will be the consensus nominee. And in November he will win a convincing victory over Grampa McSimpson.
April 13, 2008 2:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
I know what you mean... The sky is not falling. Some folks here need to to stop being such... such... Democrats!
April 13, 2008 4:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
We need to hold these politicians accountable for all of our country's woes. I don't live in rural PA but I am bitter and I know that millions of Americans are bitter. Clinton can't put a bandage on this, the top has been blown off. America needs to grow, evolve, change and come to terms with our ugly underbelly. Are we really one, are we really the United States of America? Or are we divided? Let's wake up and change our nation, let's hold these "leaders" accountable, we pay their pay-checks. For people who want to hang on to the Clinton dream, you are living in the past, we need to MOVE ON, TOGETHER THOUGH. Wake up, Clinton is dividing us to get votes, how can you stand by her?
April 13, 2008 2:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Every non-felon should own a gun if they so desire. Walk in unexpectedly into someone's home, bye, time's up.
This shoot to kill will save the taxpayers money to house and feed the bums as well as free up the courts. Just shoot (aim properly as we want to limit property damage) and it's over. Bad guy down. The Supreme Court will decide in May 08 and eliminate stupid gun laws in NY, DC, etc. where only the criminal can have a gun.
Maybe a conservative Supreme Court is not all that bad.
April 13, 2008 2:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Marginal, that you are!
Go play now!
April 13, 2008 2:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
I have to do my part here and at the ObamaPost. The ObmaaPost has a Timothy Leary LSD like therapeutic and spiritual karma with Empty Suit Obama. TPM members for the most part, are just articulate leftists and shallow dreamers for Obama.
Anyway, I took a week off watching my dollar become worthless while in Europe. All Bush's fault. I'm back to watch Hillary beat Obama by 20% in PA.
April 13, 2008 3:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Finally, Hillary gets an opportunity to show everyone that she's more American than Obama:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-hbPmcMFxU
April 13, 2008 3:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Clinton Portrays Herself as a Pro-Gun Churchgoer
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/12/clinton-portrays-herself-as-a-pro-gun-churchgoer/
April 13, 2008 3:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Senator Obama's remarks are elitist and they're out of touch. They are not reflective of the values and beliefs of Americans."
Is this a Democrat or a Republican speaking?
April 13, 2008 3:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Neither. This is an opportunistic person speaking.
I have no pipe dreams of her EVER doing what is right for the people; as in regular, low to upper-middle class people.
The wealthy people? Yes, she will do right by then, because that is what will continue to give her opportunity to grab and hold power.
She lacks integrity AND she won't deliver what we need, because that is not her agenda. Come November, if she was the nominee (but she won't!) social progress would not EVER be in her agenda. I have no doubt that if she needed to reverse abortion rights to achieve and stay in power, she would.
What I find amazing is that many of you don't see this. But I understand that you would find it important to get out in November to cast a vote for her (fat chance!) What I believe is that Hillary's and McCain presidencies wouldn't differ by much.
Please someone explain to me why Hillary doesn't want to ban cluster bombs? Is someone here convinced that you could be invested in creating a better world AND vote against banning cluster bombs?
Is someone here convinced that when it comes to signing trade deals with other countries, Hillary will consider the good of the country over Bill's pocket?
April 13, 2008 9:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
She won't be the first Clinton to backstab the Democratic party.
April 13, 2008 2:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Unfortunately Hillary the duck hunter last year acknowledged in an MSNBC debate that she has not had a gun in her house her entire adult life:
http://www.docstrangelove.com/2008/04/13/hillary-clinton-from-tuzla-to-guns
The facts will get in the way of her pandering for the gun vote.
April 13, 2008 3:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
What I'm really waiting to see is how all these Clinton trolls start spinning like a gyroscope when Clinton becomes McCain's VP choice.
'cause we all know that's going to happen.
That's where all this is headed.
Oh, she'll do it, you bet your ass she'll do it.
In a New York second.
April 13, 2008 3:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
James Blunt lookalike, Hillary is a Democrat and she plays by Clinton's rules (as Obama uses race to deflect legit arguments against him). I personally have no problem with either as that is politics, not some sort of new BS Obama is spewing. The man is from Chicago, home to the Daley dynasty of Chicago politics. I want a POTUS and specifically if a woman POTUS in the Margaret Thacher mold. Excellent Politico piece which I think more than answers your question:
12 reasons 'bitter' is bad for Obama MIKE ALLEN:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0408/9561.html
Here are a dozen reasons why:
1. It lets Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) off the mat at a time when even some of her top supporters had begun to despair about her prospects. Clinton hit back hard on the campaign trail Saturday. And her campaign held a conference call where former Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack, a Pittsburgh native, described Obama’s remarks as “condescending and disappointing” and “undercutting his message of hope.”
2. If you are going to say something that makes you sound like a clueless liberal, don’t say it in San Francisco. Obama’s views might have been received very differently if he had expressed them in public to Pennsylvania voters, saying he understood and could alleviate their frustrations.
3. Some people actually use guns to hunt — not to compensate for a salary that’s less than a U.S. senator’s.
4. Some people cling to religion not because they are bitter but because they believe it, and because faith in God gives them purpose and comfort.
5. Some hard-working Americans find it insulting when rich elites explain away things dear to their hearts as desperation. It would be like a white politician telling blacks they cling to charismatic churches to compensate for their plight. And it vindicates centrist Democrats who have been arguing for a decade that their party has allowed itself to look culturally out of touch with the American mainstream.
6. It provides a handy excuse for people who were looking for a reason not to vote for Obama but don’t want to think of themselves as bigoted. It hurts Obama especially with the former Reagan Democrats, the culturally conservative, blue-collar workers who could be a promising voter group for him. It also antagonizes people who were concerned about his minister but might have given him the benefit of the doubt after his eloquent speech on race.
7. It gives the Clinton campaign new arguments for trying to recruit superdelegates, the Democratic elected officials and other insiders who get a vote on the nomination. A moderate politician from a swing district, for example, might not want to have to explain support for a candidate who is being hammered as a liberal. And Clinton’s agents can claim that for all the talk of her being divisive, Obama has provided plenty of fodder to energize Republicans.
8. It helps Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) frame a potential race against Obama, even though both of them have found support among independents. Now Republicans have a simple, easily repeated line of attack to use against Obama as an out-of-touch snob, as they had with Sen. John F. Kerry after he blundered by commenting about military funding, “I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it.”
9. The comments play directly into an already-established narrative about his candidacy. Clinton supporters have been arguing that Obama has limited appeal beyond upscale Democrats — the so-called latte liberals. You can’t win red states if people there don’t like you. “Elites need to understand that middle-class Americans view values and culture as more important than mere trickery,” said Paul Begala, a Clinton backer. “Democrats have to respect their values and reflect their values, not condescend to them as if they were children who’ve been bamboozled.”
10. The timing is terrible. With the Pennsylvania primary nine days off, late-deciding voters are starting to tune in. Obama and Clinton are scheduled to appear separately on CNN on Sunday for a forum on, of all topics, faith and values. And ABC News is staging a Clinton-Obama debate in Philadelphia on Wednesday. So Clinton has the maximum opportunity to keep a spotlight on the issue. Besides sex, little drives the news and opinion industry more than race, religion, culture and class. So as far as chances the chattering-class will perpetuate the issue, Obama has hit the jackpot.
11. The story did not have its roots in right-wing or conservative circles. It was published — and aggressively promoted — by The Huffington Post, a liberally oriented organization that was Obama’s outlet of choice when he wanted to release a personal statement distancing himself from some comments by the Rev. Wright.
12. It undermines Democratic congressional candidates who had thought that Obama would make a stronger top for the ticket than Clinton. Already, Republican House candidates are challenging their Democratic opponents to renounce or embrace Obama’s remarks. Ken Spain, press secretary for the National Republican Congressional Committee, said: “There is a myth being perpetuated by Democrats and even some in the media that an Obama candidacy would somehow be better for their chances down ballot. But we don’t believe that is the case.”
Politico's Jonathan Martin, Jim VandeHei and John F. Harris contributed to this story.
April 13, 2008 3:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
What are "Clinton's rules"?
April 13, 2008 11:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Here's tired, nipple ringed Andy Sullivan's view of Clinton Rules:
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/03/the-clinton-rul.html
Patrick J. Buchanan: Playing by Obama's Rules
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/PatrickJBuchanan/2008/03/14/playing_by_obamas_rules
April 13, 2008 1:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
You want someone like MARGARET THATCHER? Please remove yourself immediately. Goodbye.
April 14, 2008 3:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
So Hillary:
1. Tells tall tales about her experiences.
2. Panders to whoever will listen.
3. Makes promises she knows will not be kept.
4. Sticks around long after she's welcome.
4. Does shooters.
Hillary Clinton is a barfly.
April 13, 2008 4:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Geesh Hill. Did your very republican Daddy teach you to pander for votes too? Glad to see you are still that same Goldwater Girl underneath all that Ivy League snarkyness!
April 13, 2008 4:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
i eagerly await Paul Krugman's next column attacking Hillary Clinton for using right-wing talking points against a fellow Democrat.
..........
April 13, 2008 4:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
duck season
wabbit season
duck season!
wabbit season!
...wabbit season
DUCK SEASON! FIRE!!!!
April 13, 2008 5:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
LMAO!! I have to use that.
April 13, 2008 6:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
I wouldn't be surprised if Hillary shows up wearing some daisy duke shorts and a t-shirt with a gun pictured on the front, and "I'm ready to be cocked" in bold print.
April 13, 2008 5:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
From the AP Wire:
"Clinton tossed back another shot of Crown Royal, raised the blunderbuss high in the air, and shouted, "From my cold, dead hands! From my cold, dead hands!" Cackling, she grabbed a full mug of beer from a nearby patron, downed it in one gulp, and screamed, "Now let's go show them goddamn ducks just how fucking bitter we are!"
The largely Republican crowd erupted in cheers.
April 13, 2008 5:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
From Reuters:
Hillary Reminisces about Hunting, Fishing, Boxing, Snowmobiling, Stock Car Racing and "Banging As Many Chicks As Possible" in College
April 13, 2008 5:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Last week she was Rocky Balboa. Now she's Elmer Fudd.
April 13, 2008 6:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary Clinton's position on Gun Control: License and register all handgun sales. (Jun 2000)
Hillary Clinton's position on Gun Control:
Backed off a national licensing registration plan on guns. (Jan 2008)
http://ontheissues.org/Hillary_Clinton.htm#Gun_Control
Anyone surprised?
April 13, 2008 6:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bitterness, they drown their bitterness.
April 13, 2008 7:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
RATS. This was In reply to ChrisNBama
April 13, 2008 12:33 AM
April 13, 2008 7:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's time for all good Democrats to write to Reid, Pelosi, Dean, and their local leaders to convince them to drive Hillary out of the race. She can't win, she's doing nothing to improve her own chances in the general, and she's handing out gifts to the Republicans. It's time for this to end. It's time for them to step up and do what they're charged to do.
If Hillary were to somehow manage to convince the superdelegates to overturn the will of the voters and back her instead, voters would damn well teach her the true meaning of the word "bitter" in November.
She's from Hell. She needs to go home and stay there.
April 13, 2008 7:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
If she is such a gun enthusiast, has she taught Chelsey to shot a gun, too? Has she taken her hunting as well? If so, maybe that is why she was willing to take Chelsey to Bosnia...it was probably not more dangerous taking her there than to take her into the woods in WI during hunting season. Just wondering...
April 13, 2008 7:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
If she is such a gun enthusiast, has she taught Chelsey to shot a gun, too? Has she taken her hunting as well? If so, maybe that is why she was willing to take Chelsey to Bosnia...it was probably not more dangerous taking her there than to take her into the woods in WI during hunting season. Just wondering...
April 13, 2008 7:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oops...apologies for the double posting... ;-/
April 13, 2008 7:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
One more thing to consider...there is a way in which these comments by Senator Clinton actually bring up, either consciously or unconsciously, the issue of race. Sociologically and demographically, the experience of guns in many of white communities is very different than the experience of guns in many black communities. By embracing the "gun culture" with these comments, Senator Clinton sadly seems to be appealing to racially divided experiences with guns. It plays to the baser parts of her "base."
(I hope Senator Obama does not stoop to a potentially Dukakis-in-the-tank moment by going out hunting/shooting. Okay, I know he is smarter than that!)
April 13, 2008 7:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Now she can go hunting with Mitt Romney.
April 13, 2008 8:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
This woman is a total idiot!
I don't if I should start calling her Joe Lieberman for moving so far to the right, or Mitt Romney for making shit up about how much she loves guns!
Shut the hell up you moron...
April 13, 2008 8:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is so ridiculous that of course the traditional media, and Clinton, is making this an issue. What Barack said is absolutely true, he just didn't say it as well as he said it to Charlie Rose in 2004 ( see the video on TPM). Does Hillary really think that he saying she learned to shoot as a child makes her appealing to rural voters? I wish the uncommitted superdelegates would hurry up and realize that this BS needs to stop, that Clinton is doing damage to our nominee, and needs to be forced out of this race.
April 13, 2008 8:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
Interesting how the two candidates have reacted to recent gaffes from their opponents.
Recently, Senator Clinton and her husband have become entangled in a false story about Bosnia. Senator Obama said nothing.
Former President Clinton was revealed to have accepted $800,000 from the government of Columbia to advocate for a free trade agreement that his wife opposes. Senator Obama said nothing.
Senator Obama uses a poor choice of words to describe how some people in Pennsylvania feel bitter toward their situation. Senator Clinton brings it up repeatedly, calling him elitist, casting his statements as demeaning, charging he is out of touch.
The tenor of the two campaigns is so different. I feel strongly that the superdelegates are looking past the rhetoric to the demeanor of the candidates in determining who they want to support.
April 13, 2008 8:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
It reminds me of the time when I was a kid and my aunt made this great pecan pie. It smelled soooo good. So I had a slice. And it tasted great. So I had another. It still tasted wonderful, but I was getting full. But they were in the other room, so I had 2 more slices. It tasted like the most perfect thing I had ever eaten.
But I ate too much and about 45 minutes later I threw it all up.
Hillary, put down the fork!
April 13, 2008 8:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
A couple things here. First, I pretty much agree with Obama's statement about bitter voters and the whole scapegoat mentality. I also sympathize with Michele Obama's comment earlier in the campaign about never feeling pride in her country before (and you can spin it however you want, she said it and she meant it that way). I also understand where Jeremiah Wright is coming from and agree with much of what he said (except for complete crazy talk like the CIA engineering HIV to kill blacks). I also have no doubt that Hillary and Bill feel the exact way Obama does about the reasons white middle class voters don't trust government and vote on social issues instead of economic ones. I even appreciate the fact that Obama is the only national politician I have ever heard utter such words of truth in public.
But here's the rub. The things he and those close to him have said are the way you lose elections. It surely resonates with progressives and former apathetics, but it stings in the heartland. You may think its unfortunate that Hillary has been complicit in tarring him this way every time one of these things comes up, but he is going to get it tenfold in the GE. It wouldn't make one iota of difference if she just kept her mouth shut. Just wait for the endless 527 ads. I think the reason she isn't keeping her mouth shut is because its becoming clearer every day that he cannot win in the GE. He might have slight leads (or MOE dead heats) in national polls, but those are meaningless. It is because he has overwhelming leads in liberal states with large populations that skews the national totals. If you look at state by state matchups, McCain is beating him in all the states he actually needs to win (VA, FL, PA, OH).
Now, I have no reason to believe Hillary would have a better chance. But her campaign has been right about a few things. Obama has not been fully vetted yet, and he is an unseasoned politician who doesn't understand the base of the party. As a result, he and his minions make careless statements that reveal their true leanings and those leanings are not the leanings of the average joe. I seriously doubt there is anything Obama can do or say to repair himself in their eyes, which means he cannot win the GE. He really should have gotten a little more experience at politics before trying to play at this level (and I am not saying that his real world experience doesn't trump hers—in many ways, it does—he just clearly does not know how to play the game yet and no amount of popular enthusiasm among an elite demographic can compensate for that).
Its unfortunate. The more I heard the guy speak the actual truth, the more I warmed to him as a true progressive and not just a panderer. The true problem is one I have stated before. Appealing to emotion as the centerpiece of a campaign strategy cuts both ways. There are those who will adore you and those who will despise you. Until Americans start making decisions with their brains instead of their guts or hearts, we will be in for an endless see-saw ride. I fear that when Obama loses, his supporters will disappear in the woodwork once again and not really remain engaged progressives. I just hope that their one-time showing in the GE will create a lot of coattails and a complete Democratic rout in congress. Sadly, most of them won't be back in '10 to protect the gains.
April 13, 2008 8:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
This shot business is killing me...really I have been laughing for hours...it is a shame really if she did some Yeiger shots maybe she would come to her bleeding senses. Man duck hunting? Has Elmer Fudd been hnging out with the Clinton campaign...well Penn does kinda look like him I suppose. If she thinks the repubs are going to slaughter Obama and she is better prepared? Give me a huge break, sniper, ducks and shots this will be a perception field day of monumental proportions. Man sorry cant type anymore this is too comical
April 13, 2008 9:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
With 202 comments filed so far, I'm amazed that nobody's yet brought up the famous vodka-drinking contest between Hillary and McCain in 2004.
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/NYT_Senators_Clinton_McCain_held_vodkadrinking_0728.html
April 13, 2008 9:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Interesting.
This NYT article backs that story up.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/29/washington/29rivals.html
Hillary is the good ole boy. status quo.
No wonder Republicans are rallying behind her.
April 13, 2008 9:46 AM | Reply | Permalink