Read: It's not going away if they have anything to say about it.

If for no other reason than the way he supported Lieberman in the last election, with so much dishonesty and so much vigor, he should be kicked out of the Democratic party.

Come to think of it, the entire DLC should be kicked out of the Democratic Party. They have nothing in common.

The only people this isn't going away for is Hillary and her campaign, who want to exploit this ignorance and racism, this right-wing smear from Fox News for their own political gain. It is beyond shameless that they are trying to make an issue out of this.

Besides, it is obviously not a problem considering his numbers in the polls have only gone UP since then. Also, the GOP can't use it against him, because McCain, and Huckabee, have defended Obama and Wright, and McCain has his own crazy church issues, as does the whole Republican Party.

Face it, this is nothing more than a shameless and desperate attempt to scare superdelegates into voting for her. And obviously it isn't working because she hasn't gained any over this, while Obama keeps picking up more.

It appears that Lanny Davis, Gov Rendell and Hillary Clinton are worried that the Rev. Wright story WILL fade away. They seem to be the only ones still PUSHING IT.

Polls show that Americans don't, for the most part, care about the story. Dem's still vote for Obama. They are smarter then Lanny, Rendell and Hillary - they don't agree that what the pastor says is the same way Obama feels.

The Hillary Camp are ERY WORRIED alright -- not about the Wright story hurting Obama; but about Hillary losing in Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Indiana because of her own lies (Bosnia sniper fire, Penn and Bill's Columbia connections).

The Racist campaign of Obama's moves on.
Via The Tartan, the student newspaper for Carnegie Mellon on a Michelle Obama campaign rally in PA: Some students at the event questioned the practices of Mrs. Obama’s event coordinators, who handpicked the crowd sitting behind Mrs. Obama. The Tartan’s correspondents observed one event coordinator say to another, “Get me more white people, we need more white people.” To an Asian girl sitting in the back row, one coordinator said, “We’re moving you, sorry. It’s going to look so pretty, though.”
“I didn’t know they would say, ‘We need a white person here,’ ” said attendee and senior psychology major Shayna Watson, who sat in the crowd behind Mrs. Obama. “I understood they would want a show of diversity, but to pick up people and to reseat them, I didn’t know it would be so outright.” The politics of theater. Can you imagine if a similar request for African-Americans was made by the Clinton campaign? It would lead the evening news.

Seems like wishful thinking from the Helms campaign, er, I mean, Hillary campaign.

Bosnia-gate is not going away either!

McCain who faced real bullets can go up against Hillary's Bosnia fanatasy.

She wrote her own Swiftboat ad!

The questions remain: Why did he stay a member of the congregation? Why didn't he speak up earlier? And why did he reward Rev. Wright with a campaign position even after knowing of his comments?

Lanny, as they say in courtrooms all across America, asked and answered. Your attempts to place him at the scene of the crime, notwithstanding, you acknowledge that Senator Obama clearly doesn't share those views. And despite Senator Obama's unequivocal statements that he was not present when these statements were made and that he learned of them after they became a YouTube sensation, you pretend that there is still some question on this matter. More to the point, you ignore his unequivocal statement and pose a question that suggests that his statement was false.

To be frank, it is virtually impossible to speak out against statements until after you hear them. And if he did not know of these statements until their YouTubing, as you are well aware, then it is disingenuous to ask why he was awarded a campaign spot. Just as it would disingenuous to ask why Senator Clinton why she and President Clinton invited Reverend Wright to a White House breakfast knowing that he made these controversial statements.

I don't question your motives, I question your integrity and intelligence. It is a sad day when a so-called Democrat engages in tactics such as these. A sad day indeed.

We hope the rumor is true. Pastor Wright, his Church and his Church Members are going to file a Defamation of Character, Malice, Slander, Libel, Deception, Distortion Law Suit against the Networks, Pundits, Host and network Attorneys for not doing due diligence. In regard to airing those deceptive Sermons. 



Go to YOUTUBE.com to see the complete Sermons of Paster Wright. Instead you guys in the Media continue to show the Deceptive 15-30 seconds clips over and over again.

Tell the Whole Story FOX! Barack Obama's pastor Wright

http://uk.youtube.com/user/TRINITYCHGO

Sam Stein>> Meet The (White) Man Who Inspired Wright's Controversial Sermon

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/politics/

"Can you imagine if a similar request for African-Americans was made by the Clinton campaign? It would lead the evening news."

Actually, campaigns do this sort of orchestration all the time. I was once moved from a section of the bleachers at a rally because I wasn't wearing the same Union T-shirt as people around me.

Regarding the Wright issue - fine let it come up - it's another opportunity for Obama to handle it well - and for McCain's wacko religious supporters to be outed.

You know what else isn't going away?

Everything from travelgate to whitewater to stained blue dresses to Bosnia lies.

They may swiftboat Obama...but they'll swiftFLEET Hillary.

They may swiftboat Obama...but they'll swiftFLEET Hillary.

No shit, Sherlock.

They are dying to run against her - this is the worst they can come up with against Obama? They are dying to run against her.

For the love of heaven - it's going to be all Monica all the time, among many many other things.

We get to replay the entire 90s, plus every moment since they impeached Bill. From his pardons to her association with scum - they will absolutely slaughter Clinton and the party in the process.

Via The Tartan, the student newspaper for Carnegie Mellon on a

And last night gotalife was citing LittleGreenFootballs in support of HIllary.

LittleGreenFootballs - you know what Squeaky and his minions really call LGF? LittleGookfuckers. Squeaky is probably the most racist violent hateful blogger on the planet. Well, next to Misha, the Rottweiler.

What a pair - dem and gotalife. If they aren't Repug trolls, who needs Repug trolls.

I can't decide who's worse -- Lanny Davis for being a concern troll or Eric Kleefeld for being a slut (by posting this).

Perhaps I've lost my sense of objectivity, but the Clintons seem to be surrounded by either whiny wankers or slimy henchmen.

Lanny Davis coming across as the former, Terry McAuliffe the latter.

Actually, I'm sure Lanny and Terry can be decent guys on some level, but I'm getting irritated at the Clinton camp's selfish prolonging of their hopeless cause that is now damaging the person who in all reasonable likelihood (Democrats are beginning to realize) has already won the nomination.

Lanny Davis, Harold Ickes and those of their ilk are just so desperate to keep the Wright issue alive, in the faint hope they can keep the primaries close enough to somehow win this thing with Superdelegates (which isn't happening, by the way)....Bringing up the Wright issue is about as transparent as someone who says "I don't think the country is ready for a (black man, woman, etc.) to be President, I personally am ready, of course, but the country isn't."

It doesn't seem to be working with the Superdelegates either....Hillary's advantage has shrunk down to 28 Supers according to Real Clear Politics. The writing is on the wall, so guys like Davis and Ickes are going to have to decide whether they want to get on board the freight train, or get their asses run over by it.

Lanny Davis is one of the reasons why, even though I will vote for her if she's the nominee, I'm not particularly enthused about Clinton.

He's a loathsome individual who represents the appeasement wing of the Democratic party. The ultimate insider, who's had a serious negative impact on Democrats.

I loathe him.

Lanny Davis is the guy who wrote glowingly back in January about the idea of a McCain-Clinton ticket.

"But I'm betting that such a third ticket won't be necessary, because either Democrats or Republicans -- or both -- will nominate a bipartisan ticket in 2008 or commit to a bipartisan presidency after the election. And I'll wager that if only one of the parties does it, that party will win."

Nuff said.

The fact that Lanny Davis put this out to the public must mean that Ickes and his crew of ten teephone-wielding assistants couldn't persuade the super delegates with the Wright issue.

So in an illogical desperate ploy, this public article is saying 'SEE, the Wright issue will stay alive', SEE...it's still alive SEE....here's proof it is still alive......SEE!!! [because, well, we in Hillaryland have to keep it alive, 'cause he's whopping our last hopes]

You also gotta love how he declares that "attacking the motives" of the people keeping this alive is "unfair" because this is going to be an issue in November, when in fact attacking those motives is exactly how it should be dealt with in November if it's still being talked about, so how the hell could it be "unfair" to do it now?

But I'm sure if we tell them it's "unfair," to bring it up, Republicans will say they're sorry and drop the whole thing. Right, Lanny?

I was a Hillary supporter with my voice and checkbook from 01/07 to 01/08. The turning point for me was a Lanny Davis interview on NPR after Bill had let the Jesse Jackson and He only won cause he's black rap out of the garbage can. I had always supported Bill and I was impressed with Hillary in NY. But listening on NPR to Lanny blaming Obama for Bill's comments and saying that Obama had started this food fight actually shocked me. I have been a senior political appointment for two governors(neither of whom I campaigned for!)so I am not naive. And in fact, I admired the way Lanny defended Bill during Monicagate. But the consistent use of race by the Clinton Campaign, most disgustingly and consistently by Lanny Davis, has turned me off big time.

Also: Listening to all the Clintonites saying that they will not vote for Obama in the general, I want to say that I will not vote for Hillary if she is the nominee. And who will be the number one victims of such small minded petty personal poltics: The women who support Hillary who will see the Supreme Court take away their right to choose.

Sorry, I am just so disgusted with Hillary, her campaign, and her supporters. If she is the nominee, I will vote for Nader/McCain. No. Sadly, I care too much for my country and my party, because of its more humane values.

Harold Ickes should be ashamed of himself.

The premise of Davis's piece is that Obama should have left the congregation; but what does that say about the 8,000 members of Trinity? If, as Davis suggests, there is a moral reason to leave the church, that reason should apply to all members; there's no double standard on that. Is Davis saying the entire congregation is morally bankrupt? Of course not, because the reality of Wright and Trinity is that he and the church have done many many good things...things that one doesn't renounce on the basis of three snippets.

I don't know what Davis's motivations are (I lied, I do, as we all do); but I can't believe a man of Ickes' history and principles would subscribe to Davis's formulation of the "issue" in the WSJ.

Mr. Ickes, what do you believe in?

We already know 20% of whites will never vote for any black man. Sounds like Lanny Davis is in that group.

http://www.christiancentury.org/article.lasso?id=4678
April 22, 2008

The Wright context
If you were to visit Trinity United Church of Christ, a predominantly African-American congregation on the Chicago's South Side, you would be warmly welcomed. You'd experience spirited singing that comes deep from the soul. You'd feel the palpable pain of the people, many of whom live in neighborhoods where innocent children are caught in the crossfire of warring gangs, where police officers are regularly accused of engaging in racial profiling, and where the rates of incarceration and unemployment are extremely high. And until his recent retirement from the pulpit, you would have heard the powerful preaching of Jeremiah Wright.

We don't know if the United States is willing to elect a black candidate to its highest office. But it is already clear that many Americans are not interested in understanding the prophetic preaching of a black minister.