ARG: Pennsylvania Primary Now Tied

A new poll of Pennsylvania from American Research Group shows the Democratic primary here to be a tie. Here are the numbers, compared to the previous poll from a week and a half ago:

Clinton 45% (-6)
Obama 45% (+6)

On the one hand, ARG has not had a stellar record this cycle. On the other hand, plenty of other polls have shown the race tightening, and this poll is also indicative of significant movement within ARG's own sampling.


Comments (68)

Still 2 weeks until the primary, is it crazy to think Obama just might win this thing?

It's not crazy. We all thought he was going to lose Iowa too.

Hell of an avatar

I don't give any single poll much credence. But taken all together and when they all show the same trend, that's very telling and credible, I think.

avatar

It's like Ohio. He's closing the gap, which is pretty impressive considering her previously huge lead, but it's still going to require a big turnout for Obama to have a chance. Hillary could bounce back for 10+ point win too.

So, constant vigilance and all that.

avatar

THIS IS EXCELLENT NEWS!! FOR HILLARY!!!

I would die for you, idiotic. You know that, right? I would jump on a landmine for you, or take a bullet, or spend three days with gotalife in a stuck levator for you.

I...I just wanted you to know that.

You're supposed to jump on grenades for other people, not landmines. Jumping on a landmide for idiotic just puts idiotic at greater risk. You could walk through a minefield for idiotic. Or you could fall in love for idiotic. After all, love is a battlefield...

But don't jump on any landmines...

avatar

no, they're not tied. clinton is still leading! but it's nice for you guys to cling on to some hope!

Thats right. Who you gonna believe okee or your lying eyes?

I agree with you. About 2-3 weeks ago, Hillary was up 21 points, I posted here that we shall see how the numbers move going forward. So far, I have not seen anything indicating a win for Obama!

As of now, she is going to bank a 20 point WIN in PA!

It's weird that there are now several polls showing the race tied and several polls showing the Hillary ahead by 8-12, but not really any polls in between. The average of the last 8 polls is about 5.5%.

But they all show Obama making gains. The specific numbers aren't important, I think. It's the trend that they all show.

avatar

okee,


Yep, we love our Hope, we just bathe in it, in fact! Of course the irony of a Clinton supporter talking about clinging to hope is rather thick, isn't it? Given that Senator Clinton has about the same chance to win as a snowstorm... in Florida... in August.

avatar

It would be overly optimistic to expect Obama to win PA, but the polls are clearly indicating that he will do well there. It's consistent with his overall momentum since he quickly recovered from the Wright controversy. He showed that he can weather PR storms. He's a man of substance. He's Presidential material. I see him taking the nomination handily. Hillary needs to come up with an exit strategy that will preserve her dignity. Obama needs start thinking about McCain and November, and I've no doubt he is.

avatar

Clinton is going to win Pennsylvania by double digits.

I agree, but I did hear Rendell backtracking and trying to lower her expectations by saying it would be within 5% this weekend.

Goalpost moving.

Clinton is going to lose PA by double digits. Then she will drop out. Then she will say Obama will win the GE.

And then she'll add that the biggest reason for his winning the GE will be that he was able to demonstrate how to defeat a slime ball. She won't say it in so many words, of course, but it'll be evident to anyone who's been paying attention.

The longer she stays in, the longer she gets to savour what it's like to be a loser. It's an opportunity for her to learn something about humility. I hope she takes it.

The more folk hear from Hillary . . . The more folk vote for the other Republican running for the DEM nomination.

McCain-Clinton '08

Remember, Hillary needs to win by at least 10% for her to get any sort of appreciable delegate gain. Anything less and her already long chances of getting the nomination get even longer. Especially with only North Carolina left as a major delegate prize and Obama ahead there by double digits.

Try 20%.

avatar

Ohiomeister: I think the issue is timing. All the polls that show the race tightening to a couple of points where taken after March 31st. The one exception is the Muhlenberg poll, which was done over the course of an entire week, starting before March 31st and ending after. So if you're looking for trends, I think there's an almost-unanimous agreement among the polls that the trend since April 1st has been strongly in Obama's direction.

That was the case in Ohio and Texas, too, of course, so the real key is going to be whether he can keep the momentum going, or whether it will stall and backslide.

Yes they are. The poll says so.

It seems Hillary's Friday night dump worked, her tax returns are barely a blimp on the news atm. Good planning on her part, dump it on the 40th of MLK assassination. Also with the Iraq report coming in early this week the media has gone right onto the next story.

avatar

Last I heard, Obama is outspending Hillary 5 to 1 in television ads in Pennsylvania, and we all know how effective television ads are. That is why Obama will be in trouble over Jeremiah Wright, his refusal to wear the American Flag, and Michelle's comments. McCain supporters will flood the airwaves with swift boat ads, and they will be effective.

Have other folks looked at the actual numbers in the ARG website write-up of this? If not, I encourage you to do so. The interesting fact that leapt out at me is that the number of folks claiming that they plan to vote for "someone else" has been growing quickly. Is it possible that voters are becoming tired of both of these two? Or is it possible that they are simply growing tired of Clinton (after all, the tie result is not only a function of Obama gaining, but also of Clinton losing support in PA rather drastically according to ARG's numbers)?

avatar

the nearer your destination
the more you're slip sliding away
i know a woman
became a wife
these are the very words
she uses to describe her life
a good day ain't got no polls
a bad day's when I lie in bed
and think that in 2012
i'll be much too old

This IS great news for Hillary. Now they'll dial down expectations and when she wins by 8 the media will proclaim her, for the 100th time, the Comeback Kid. I lived in Pittsburgh for several years. Despite the awesome endorsements of the Bus and Franco Harris, it's Clinton country.

If Obama ties or wins in Pa, it's over.

Can I say that? Would Clinton graciously concede?

Or am I just falling into a dastardly trap, where Obama loses by a couple points and Clintonianites crow, "See?!? Yet again the Golden Boy doesn't meet expectations! UNELECTABLE!"

They've already set the theme that Obama can't claim victory in PA regardless of whatever happens.

If Clinton wins by .00001%, it's an epic victory where the voice of the people has clearly been heard.

If Obama wins, it's only because he outspent her.

If you happened to catch Rendell on Meet the Press, you could see the spin taking form. I always thought goalposts were those things firmly planted in the end-zone. Apparently they're carry-on luggage that can be hoisted up wherever one wants.

The only thing that will put an end to this farce will be to beat her by 5+ in PA and then by 15+ in NC and a win in IN too. 3 straight losses outta wrap it up.

Since Obama tends to win by less than the polls indicate before the election, any Obama win can be spun as a loss because of failure to meet expectations....

Plus we will be warned darkly that the difference indicates the extent of racism in the public.... "so Obama can't win."

And of course if he merely meets his own definition of success ... "a 10% or less loss".... then the recent surge in the polls will be used to portray a 10% or less defeat as a failure to meet what should have been the revised expectations based on the pre-election polls.

There is no winning this game with the Clintons except by the delegate count and popular vote count itself.... which the Clinton campaign continues to find ways to argue shouldn't really count at all.

avatar

Even Clinton Pennsylvania backer Governor Rendell as much as admitted that she would not win PA by double digits. On MTP, Rendell moved the goal posts, saying that a 5-9% win by Hillary in PA would 'prove' her new 'momentum'.

Of course, Rendell is in a tough spot, since Hillary's momentum has been downhill all month, according to these polls.

But, hey, a 5-9% win may not be the A+ grade she desperately needs, but it is at least a mediocre grade C or barely passing grade D instead of a total failure grade F.

A 5-9% win would prove her momentum. Down, that is. ;)

avatar

When I engaged in GOTV in 2004, I went to Pennsylvania because I had a free bed with my mother and I figured it was a true swing state where my efforts would make a difference. All the GOTV was organized through unions that have a laser focus on free trade agreements, so I think that the CAFTA incident might have been fairly damaging. It puts the lie to her working class cred. The tax returns probably would not hurt but for the CAFTA issue. I don't know that firing Penn helps.

Also, if you look at the internals, what the ARG poll really seems to show is how embedded HRC's support is with older white women and how malleable it is with other groups.

Gotta keep the goal-posts in place. Obama stated after OhXas that keeping PA within 10pts would be considered a victory - which barring unusual circumstances it looks like he will do. Of course if he really does pull out a victory, the race is over. It is over now but...it will be more apparent I guess.

I wouldn't expect a slide like OhXas unless there is some minor scandal or something. The difference now is that voters are more familiar with Obama. My theory is that in NH and OhXas, people were still relatively unfamiliar with Obama and they wanted to see more before saying 'Ok, this is our choice'. All 3 places knew that a vote for Obama would end the race and a vote for Clinton would keep it going - so either sub-conciously or maybe in a collective concience way there was a not-so-fast decision.

Now however, we have seen Obama handle controversy and adversity. Clinton has shown cracks in her armor (exposed by sniper fire)and there seems to be a general coalescing around Obama as a result. People, I think, are now ready to say 'OK- he's our guy'. That is why you see Obama beginning to open up bigger/more consistent leads, closing the gap in PA pretty quickly and making gains vs. McCain.

avatar

Newfapalooza said,

"People, I think, are now ready to say 'OK- he's our guy'."
-----------

And the recent endorsements and expressions of support from Super Delegates and others have helped a lot in this regard.

When Hillary caught that ball right before it hit the turf and ran it in for a touchdown, under heavy sniper fire I might add, she won the hearts and minds of Pittsburgh fans forever.

avatar

Hmmm, speaking of the famous "Immaculate Reception", Senator Obama was recently shown campaigning with Franco Harris. And Jerome Bettis. ;-)

I agree, actually. I will not take these polls to heart--they've broken it too many times! Obama didn't win Texas or New Hampshire as they said he would (although I think the Limbaugh effect was significant in Texas for Clinton).

avatar

Vaughan, your comment doesn't make any sense. Who is the 'they' who said Obama would win Texas? I know the polls did say he would win NH, but cannot remember any that said such before the TX primary-caucus.
Secondly, you said 'Obama didn't win Texas'. Obama did, in fact, win Texas by, I believe, three delegates. Have you been out of the country, or something?

@DonnaG, Rasmussen and SurveyUSA both had Obama 1% ahead just before the election. Pollster.com is a great source for any poll taken in the 2008 election season. Here is a Texas summary.

1% has gotta be within the margin of error for any pollster except God.

avatar

Beating expectations doesn't do her any good at this point, she has to start catching up in delegates.

Next thing you will be saying is that conceding the race is good for her because it ratchets down expectations.

Recent polling trends are misogynistic.

Shame on you, ARG!

Yes, the trend is only going in one direction. Is Hillary gaining any new supporters, d'ya think? Anyone switching from Obama to Hill? I can't imagine it!

avatar


You can't turn on a television here in Central PA without seeing an Obama commercial. He's killing HRC on the airwaves.

But my guess is Hillary still wins by 8-10 percent. I think some people are flirting with the idea of voting Obama right now but will swing back Hillary's way by April 22. If Obama can keep it within five percent, I'd consider it a strong showing.

avatar

Anecdotal evidence, I know, but I had to drive across much of Pennsyltucky yesterday and I was on the lookout for yard signs and bumper stickers. I say one Hillary yard sign, one Hillary bumper sticker, 12 Obama signs, and 10 Obama stickers. Excellent news for Hillary, I know.

Finally some good news for Clinton, that she is tied in the ARG poll. When all else fails, bet this month's mortgage payment against whom ARG predicts as the winner.

Less sarcastically, I believe that the biggest impact of the Friday afternoon release of the Clintons' tax returns will be on her fund-raising among her base voters. As all the polls indicate, her base is older white women and those with smaller incomes. I can imagine that people who are struggling on less than $40K/year will now think twice about sending Clinton another $50 or $100, when Bill Clinton can pull in $40K for a 40 minute speech. People will think to themselves that Hillary Clinton should ask Bill Clinton for another loan. After all, he owes Hillary Clinton a lot more than the average voter does.

Tied in ARG, but she's losing in the Pennsylvania bumper sticker and yard sign competition.

avatar

Anecdotal evidence, I know, but I had to drive across much of Pennsyltucky yesterday and I was on the lookout for yard signs and bumper stickers. I say one Hillary yard sign, one Hillary bumper sticker, 12 Obama signs, and 10 Obama stickers. Excellent news for Hillary, I know.

Hillary will win PA just as she won Texas!

-5 delegates is a win, right?

avatar

Is it time to start singing "bye bye, BILLARY"

OsiSpeaks.com

avatar

Hillary began with a 20% lead. If Obama finishes within 5% she needs to drop out.

Just a couple of comments on expectation managment.

First, ARG has had a built-in five to six point lead for Hillary in their likely voter model pretty much throughout their election. No way to know whether this poll represents the result of an effort by then to fix that, or, also possible, whether whatever was causing the model to over estimate Hillary's support before is now causing it to overestimate Obama's.

Second, IMHO, the most critical number in Pennsylvania is the undecided number. In states like Pa--older, whiter, rustier, unionier, states where there are a lot of people who already have all the risk in their lives they can stand--the undecideds have broken heavily for Hillary. If they haven't committed to take the risk before the election, they aren't going to do it in the voting booth. (The opposite has, of course, been true in states with different economic and demographic mixes. People in farm states, for example, seem to be able to accept the perceived risk of voting for Obamas with more equanimity than people in rusty industrial states, even if their economic situation is equally troubled. I guess it comes with a lifetime in an economy that depends on the weather.)

Bottom line, a 45-45 tie in the last polls before the election likely means a 7 - 9 point win for Hillary. Just be aware of that and you won't be demoralized when the innumerate imbeciles on MSNBC and CNN breathlessly talk about a "resiliant" Hillary's "stunning comeback" in a race that "was shown as tied" as recently as a day or two ago (while making broad generalizations about white people in general based on what happened in Pennsylvania). Obama only has a chance to win in Pennsylvania if he can get a majority of those undecideds into his pile before election day.

avatar

I think this is why you are seeing Obama trying to manage expectations into the single digits (not a tie or a win), while Fast Eddie Rendell is also saying that a 5%-9% win would be a blowout in PA. They are both aiming at the same range.

avatar

Here's hoping that the phenomenon you describe seeps its way into the conventional wisdom by April 22, so that at least one voice on the "election central" panels gives voice to it on the night of the primary, if not before. I'm not holding my breath, though, at least where CNN is concerned. You'll know it's going to be painful to watch HNN if Campbell Brown is the one standing around talking to the seated brain-trust.

As I noted above, the number of respondants claiming that they will vote for "someone else" is growing. This made me curious - does anyone in PA know who else is on the ballot there? The Green Papers listing for PA only shows Clinton, Obama and "uncommitted." Is LaRouche, for instance, on the ballot in PA?

avatar

That's a pretty sharp analysis, TCFKANCS. In addition, I don't place much faith in state-wide polls if voting patterns vary as expected across districts. I'm sticking with Al Giordano's realistic analysis for now: http://ruralvotes.com/thefield/?p=986

Remember; she was ahead by 20. Obama will probably finish within 10. This shows momentum for him, not her.

And I hope to God those innumerate MSM pundits don't spin this as a Clinton comeback agai -- aww, who am I kidding?

It will come down to popular vote. Anything less than 150,000 vote margin she's dead.


Good bet: Hillary wins with a margin between 150,000 - 200,000 votes.

Key for Obama: GOTV...

avatar

kudos, interesting analysis, genuinely expanded my horizons. This is the kind of comment I would like to see more of.

avatar

Want my prediction, based on nothing in particular? Pennsylvania will be a wash; they'll end up within 1% of each other.

That's my theory, which is mine.

(although I think the Limbaugh effect was significant in Texas for Clinton).

That is the dumbest urban myth I've seen go around the internet since John fucking Titor - which at least was interesting.

I'm from Dallas - trust me - that is hooey.

Utter hooey.

How low will she go? How shrill we she get? Will she turn into the 'Monster'? What group,state,special interest, will be minimized when she loses PA.? When will it be HER fault?

Watch out for the 'Leiberman Manuver' or 'McCain/Clinton 2008'!

She can no longer save face if she ties or loses PA, cause that's all she has left. Mi or FL won't help.

avatar

This poll does not matter. Only polls where Hillary is leading witha huge margin matter. Since the margin here is small, this poll is even more worthless.

If you only count the states that Hillary won, you can see quite clearly that Hillary is winning! Isn't this enough reason for her to win the nomination? Why do we consider states that she did not win or is close in polls? I am a Hillary supporter and I don't understand this.

And don't say that I am uneducated or can't do math. I am a kindergarten graduate!

avatar

1. Late deciders will still break for Clinton as we have seen throughout the campaign. This says more about who the late deciders are than the candidates. So give her 5-6% buffer.

2. Any Obama win, remote as that is, even by .01%, will end it. Period. finito. If she loses PA, Clinton will drop out.

3. You have to wonder how the headlines "Clinton dumps Penn" will affect the race. No, seriously. Ok, not so seriously.

avatar

ondioline,

I would jump on a grenade for you after a comment like that. I'm still wiping the tears of laughter from my face.

Jump on a landmine...hah!

No offense to Lars. I am sure he simply misspoke.

One would hope that Lars would realize his verbal folly and correct himself if he and idiotic were in a real life situation wherein both a landmine and a grenade posed danger to them.

I will use one of my favorite Quotes here for this Ocasion.SHA NA NA SAY HEY HEY GOODBYE!!! AND good Ridance to the IRON *****!!!

With this poll result, HRC can declare victory, cease campaigning and divert all remaining funds into finalizing a master plan to jick up the Convention in such a way as to dash the Democratic party unto smithereens.

This will allow the clearly superior candidate, Senator Obama, to return to the Senate and buzz around the head of President McCain like an angry bee, and for us to enjoy another four years of pure hell.

We won't be paying much attention, though, because we will be numb, and anyway we will be absorbed in following the lawsuits filed by Penn Wolfson and Ickes in an effort to collect the millions the Clinton campaign owes them and refuses to pay.

God bless you HRC for stopping all that awful Yes We Can nonsense. No we can't. Forget it. Go home, Jake, this is Hillarytown.


Post a Comment

Poll Tracker

View more polls »
Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address