ABC's Ignominy Continues
...with more wingnut-frame questions, including ones on gun control and even about affirmative action and Obama's well-off daughter.
So, thus far, questions on:
"Small-town" commentsWright
Weather Underground
Flag-pin/patriotism
Gun control
Affirmative Action
...we miss any?
Advertisement

They both messed up on gun control. And I'm not following their supposed answers about affirmative action. Will have to read the transcript later...
Matthew
http://www.TheIndependentView.com
April 16, 2008 9:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, I was a little puzzled when they both hesitated on the (hand?)gun registration question.
April 16, 2008 9:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're right. This is insane.
April 16, 2008 9:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh god, I did not mean Weaver was right. Please note.
April 16, 2008 9:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
aaaargh!!
April 16, 2008 9:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you Greg for noticing.
ABCNews = FoxNews lite
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/04/abcnews-unmasked-as-foxnewslit.php
April 16, 2008 9:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
You know, Matthew, I agree with you (!)
Clinton is spouting generalities and Obama is trying to be too specific and getting lost in the details.
Ugh.
April 16, 2008 9:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
ABC sucks, its shame because they use to be such a great network back in the 1990s, what happened.
April 16, 2008 9:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Disney bought the network, which evolved as a cartoon version of reality.
April 16, 2008 9:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
And sniper fire. They did ask one of "those" question AT Hillary, lest we forget.
Unfuckingbeliveable!
April 16, 2008 9:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
April 16, 2008 9:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Josh writes:
Josh, I think this is most hopeful to the party as these are the questions that the nominee will face later. Good to see them face them now and shame on the earlier debates for avoiding these questions.
Matthew
http://www.TheIndependentView.com
April 16, 2008 9:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
It will make for a good video tomorrow by Josh, the questions in perspective.. I think there will be a backlash
TPM Thurday weekly wrap-up oughta be good
April 16, 2008 9:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bullshit Matthew Weaver. To present these questions, which even McCain would not ask in person, in a news forum, gives them an aura of credibility. And it puts both candidates in uncomfortable positions where they have to avoid saying anything that gets them into trouble without providing any useful information to voters. It's fubar.
April 17, 2008 12:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Enough of debates for this pair!
April 16, 2008 9:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Great debate, it's not on MSNBC, the Official Obama Cable News Network. This time, the empty suit was nailed by real questions not softball NBC questions.
April 16, 2008 9:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
List those real questions for us please.
April 16, 2008 9:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
What about please explain your relationship with Ayers, bet you never hear MSNBC ask that. They rather ridicule Hillary for having a can of beer.
April 16, 2008 10:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
William Ayers, is a real question to you? That was a weak question. Ayers and Obama was on the same charity board during his Illinois state senate term. The fact that ABC tried to make hay out of this as if indirectly connecting Obama to Ayers 1960s controversies is stupid.
Maybe the MSM should have questioned Hillary Clinton association with embezzler Peter Paul and the finance of her 2000 Senate campaign.
April 17, 2008 7:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Empty suite?
Repeating the same thoughts day in and day out is a sign of an empty head.
April 16, 2008 9:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
If your idea of real questions is flag lapel pins, Charlie Gibson's anxiety about his capital gains, the Weather Underground, Jeremiah Wright, the use of the word "bitter" in the context of describing certain voters, if these count as real questions.
What about the economy? What about anything more than the most cursory treatment of Iraq? What about subprime? What about global warming? What about the AMT? What about healthcare?
April 16, 2008 10:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Soviet sickle in the Obama sun is so...retrograde
April 16, 2008 10:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Marginal -
I've been catching your posts the past few days.
Are you an amateur hoping to turn some wavering progressives for the pure love of doing so? Or are you a pro? Do you do it for love or is it for the money?
Karl Rove. Lee Atwater. Do they live?
April 16, 2008 10:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
I suspect several of the regulars here, who pose as Clinton supporters, are actually wingnuts trying to stir things up.
April 16, 2008 10:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's a fact. They are all too ready to praise McCain if a choice opportunity presents itself.
April 17, 2008 12:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
agreed. i saw nothing wrong with the debate, certainly nothing more "lite" in comparison to past debates. i think the 'bots are more disturbed the empty suit was asked those un-pleasantries they'd rather ignore.
April 17, 2008 1:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
love the avatar!
April 17, 2008 9:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
So glad I was able to miss this debate. Sounds like it was quite special, in a shit special kind of way. The MSM accomplishes its goal: dumb everything down, make sure thinking people get disgusted and give up and tune out, and the rest elect the Republican.
April 16, 2008 9:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Inane.
stooopud.
Questions based on Fux Noise/Roger Ailes' talking points.
The last question after the break.
the interminable debate will END?
AWESOME!
April 16, 2008 9:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Anyone who thinks these have been real questions must think the National Enquirer is a serious newspaper!
April 16, 2008 9:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm watching on the small streaming screen. I'm seeing comments on the Web that Obama looks very down and tired. Is that true? My video doesn't show it. Does he look bad? Will it hurt him?
(Andrew Sullivan says she is "running on fumes" because this kind of fight is what she loves best.)
April 16, 2008 9:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think he just looks disgusted--sick and tired of being harassed isn't the same as looking tired.
April 16, 2008 9:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
oh please. we'll ask as long as we damned please. if the empty suit doesn't want to respond, he can get outta the kitchen.
i understand you might not like this debate as they picked on the empty suit's faults? because, trust me, IF he becomes the nominee, mccain will gladly resurrect EVERYTHING discussed here tonight.
April 17, 2008 2:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
I totally agree, Becky Lee.
And you're hot.
April 17, 2008 3:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, he looked tired. It was to bad. I'd be pretty exhausted too.
April 16, 2008 10:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm 1:05 into it now on the west coast and he doesn't look "tired" unless you mean "tired of this BS."
It's a disgusting "debate." And he's making it through this grueling crap without doing anything that ABC/Hillary can tag team him on in the future.
What kind o' politics you want? ABC/Hillary/Rove/ad nauseum, war, and growing economic divide, or something approaching what Obama is trying to do now?
I still believe this is our best shot since Bill's first term when he offered hope after a tiring 12 years of Reagan/BushI, before he turned into a giant disappointment. The country is tired now. This needs to be 1992+ and not another 1988. I think Hillary wants 1988 at this point and a more hawkish, more corporate 1992 for her in 2012.
April 17, 2008 12:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is what I think as well. Watching it right now on the west coast. Although, around his face he looks pretty tired...but part of it HAS to be the bullshit he sees in front of him.
He honestly looks like he wants to stray from the 'Nice Guy' answers he is giving and just be like "Seriously, dont ask me anything else f'in stupid, ok?".
April 17, 2008 12:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
Come on.
No one has done more for gun control than Barack Obama.
April 16, 2008 9:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
;)
April 16, 2008 9:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Any bets on what the final question will be?
Judging by the tone thus far, I think it's going to be "You're in a canoe with a Israeli child and a blind Iraqi cripple. The canoe capsizes and you can only save one. Which one do you pick?"
April 16, 2008 9:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
don't forget "The surge is working, will you surrender no matter how much the generals warn you to not surrender??!"
April 16, 2008 9:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Do you agree with Bill Pullman's decision in the film 'Independence Day' to launch a nuclear warhead at an alien warship flying over American soil?"
April 16, 2008 9:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dying laughing.
April 16, 2008 9:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
two big laughs in a row. bravo
April 17, 2008 12:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, those were blatant right-wing frame questions. NOTHING ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENT, SOCIAL SECURITY, GLOBAL WARMING, AND HEALTH CARE!!!!!
Only the Republican issues were brought up, taxes, taxes, taxes, guns, guns, religion, scary black men, affirmative action, taxes.
April 16, 2008 9:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
no kidding, would of loved some questions on science issues or technology or energy or something other then this BS.
April 16, 2008 9:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent debate.
April 16, 2008 9:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree.
In case you missed the info on the last thread"
The calling hours for Hillary will be 4-6 and 7-9 this weekend.
Prayer service following.
Burial in Pennsylvania.
In lieu of flowers, send contributions to the Help Hillary Pay Her Campaign Debt Bills Foundation.
Condolences and tributes in the memory of Senator Clinton may be posted on :
www.hillaryduckedsniperfire.com
April 16, 2008 9:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
haha! "good one." maybe the empty suit can have his spiritual mentor wright do the eulogy.
the only thing dead here is the empty suit's continued hope-mongering.
can't wait to see him go down in flames next tuesday.
April 17, 2008 2:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
Damn, stop hatin' lol.
Seriously, you sound jealous.
April 17, 2008 11:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Only a wingnut would think so. Thank you for admitting your true bent.
April 16, 2008 10:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
There were real questions on Iraq, Israel & Iran, on CiC issues, on gun control, and mostly on the economy and taxes.
Obama seems lost. He stammers and fumbles.
April 16, 2008 9:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Fascinating debate.
yeah. Fer sure.
Give me back my hour, ABC!
April 16, 2008 9:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
It was at least 44 minutes in before ABC got a real question, instead of idiocy like why won't you wear a flag pin? Even when they get around to asking about issues the questions are so asinine it makes me want to go back to the ballgame. Oh goody, to wrap up another horse race question!
April 16, 2008 9:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Stupid last question.
Matthew
http://www.TheIndependentView.com
April 16, 2008 9:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Every final debate question is going to be some variation on "Please repeat the crap you've said at the end of every other debate."
April 16, 2008 9:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Charlie Gibson get some freaking tri-focals, what is this glasses looking like testacles hanging from his face thing?
April 16, 2008 9:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
totally noticed that too. some kind of Britt Hume, faux-intellectual, elderly wizard shmaltz.
April 17, 2008 12:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
my lord, grandpa smarty-pants is going into VaTech and guns now (as I catch the clever PST RE-broadcast)
April 17, 2008 12:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
To complain to ABC, write at
http://abcnews.go.com/Site/page?id=3271346&cat=ABC%20News%20Specials
April 16, 2008 9:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just did.
It's a challenge to remember when I've been more disgusted with a "news" organization's failure to perform a public function, but this was just awful
Your link ought to be on TPM's home page.
To complain to ABC, write at
http://abcnews.go.com/Site/page?id=3271346&cat=ABC%20News%20Specials
April 16, 2008 10:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for the link. I've sent in my complaint.
April 16, 2008 11:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is great for the general.
Stop whining, they will be asked this in the general debates by the corporate media.
She owned him.
Okay, keep whining.
April 16, 2008 9:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Try "tag teamed him". Is that going to happen in the general, too?
Are you really, as rumor has it, the only person to ever get a negative score on the Mensa test?
April 16, 2008 10:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
She owned him in much the same way that any prison rapist owns the guy that four of hisbuddies are holding down while she pounds away at him. That may actually be how she learned the technique.
April 17, 2008 1:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Josh nails it again.
April 16, 2008 9:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
The list misses a small discussion of Bosnia in which Obama held back and questions about Israel and gun control. All in all, really lame. The ABC hosts continuously interrupted Obama on top of skewing the topics in favor of Obama's drama versus real issues.
April 16, 2008 9:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Did Hillary not hear the question?
April 16, 2008 9:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
yeah, they are pulling out every Republican attack on these both of them but that is just crap for a debate. Why are they asking them to defend themselves, their friends, & their pastors, neighbors, & choice of decorative accessories (did I miss anything?) for two hours.
Such crap!
April 16, 2008 9:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think it's disingenuous for TPM to decry questions on the "small town comments." I've read innumerable posts about how those comments have not downed Obama "YET" in the last four days. You all have been among the crowd saying that those comments were important. Too late to back out now.
April 16, 2008 9:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's the thing - who's watching this? It's the 26th debate?
The Mavs played New Orleans tonight and that's what Dallas watched.
April 16, 2008 9:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
I stopped watching the big three teevee networks sometime last century. Not even sure what channels they are anymore. I don't know a single person who watches ABC/NBC/CBS nightly news. Enjoy that continued market slide MSM. You've earned it.
April 16, 2008 10:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Somewhere McCain is snickering
April 16, 2008 9:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Without a doubt - as if he needed more help from the media.
April 16, 2008 10:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Are there any online polls about this "debate" that we can see?
April 16, 2008 9:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
What you need a poll to know what you think about what you saw?
Lead, follow, or get out of the way...
let me spell it out.. the debate was drowned out by Charlie Gibson.
Not the best debate not the worst for either candidate.
Crowd was well behaved and that is a credit to PA not the moderators, they didn't hijack the debate, Charlie did.
April 16, 2008 9:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, darling, I need it to find out what OTHER people think.
Not really a difficult concept.
April 17, 2008 9:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
My conclusion is that Clinton wins. Not a knock-out, but a solid win. She messed up on a few issues and a few she could have answered a bit shorter. She was prepared.
Obama lost as he stumbled into details and wanted to nuance his answers. He seemed taken aback by some questions, almost as if they went over his head. He wasn't prepared.
The debate itself was a winner. Doubt there are many undecideds left to watch at this point but it is good to see some new questions.
Matthew
http://www.TheIndependentView.com
April 16, 2008 9:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's a fascinating take.
And I doubt very much that most people outside of the Freeper community agree with you.
April 16, 2008 10:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
why is this clown allowed to come on here and shill for his own blog?
i realize no one will go there but must we have to be subjected to it in his 100 posts a day??
April 16, 2008 10:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
My prediction before the debate was that Matthew Weaver's conclusion would be that Clinton wins. DF owes me $100. Sorry, DF, I neglected to tell you about our little bet. That's because I didn't realize that we had a bet until I read MW's comment b/c really, I don't normally think about what MW thinks. But when he wrote the comment, and I realized that I knew his conclusion all along and that I would have bet $100 on it given the opportunity, and so I decided that we did in fact bet. And so you owe me $100. Because I'm the decider.
April 17, 2008 12:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
I with you, Tena. Sox v. Yanks on right now. I only watched the debate during commercials.
Go Sox!!!
April 16, 2008 9:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Screw the Sox and Boston....buncha a'holes
April 16, 2008 11:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Cardinals are beating the Brewers 5-1, top of the 6th.
April 16, 2008 9:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ummm, Go Brewers?
April 16, 2008 9:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
No.
Go Cardinals!
And they won...again.
April 16, 2008 11:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's nice, dear.
it completely misses the point, but so what?
April 16, 2008 9:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dear: How does it miss the point? TPM and other news outlets have been pounding on the "small town" comments for days which says they think it is important. Silly for Greg to now say that this stuff is proof of ABC's ignominy.
April 16, 2008 10:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not the best debate, started good and then went bad..
No freaking detail on energy policy.. nothing on national security.. but how they pick thier pastors, like I give a fvck...
As if the type of toilet paper they used would matter...
I liked the smug pan to Chelsea, reminded me of the Bakers and Christian TV.
April 16, 2008 9:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why are Obama fans unhappy? Hillary cleaned his clock? No Tweety or Obertwit to wet themselves over the Obama oratory? Sorry, ABC came to make noise and did. Who is Barack Obama and who are his friends?
April 16, 2008 9:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
It was a reckoning.
The whining here, the other Obama blogs and MSNBC is priceless.
April 16, 2008 10:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Spoken like a true freeper.
April 16, 2008 10:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Come on.
No one has done more for the Red Sox than Barack Obama.
April 16, 2008 9:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Whoa. What just happened? They were just about to go to commercial and people started yelling and Stephanopolous and Gibson. I've got TIVO and keep rewinding but can't hear what they're saying. Anyone else seeing this?
April 16, 2008 9:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Really, really hard to tell what happened there, but it was a weird moment. Lots of people started groaning and yelling at once -- may have been complaining about going to commercial. Totally impossible to tell. George and Charlie laugh it off and say "the audience is turning on us." George looks over his shoulder as if he's looking for a producer and Charlie smiles and raises his hands gracefully. Still don't get it.
April 16, 2008 10:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
huffpo had video of this posted a couple hours ago
April 17, 2008 1:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
O honey - he's been asleep for hours, are you kidding? Men that age are in bed before it's dark this time of year.
April 16, 2008 9:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well this "debate" has inspired me to go right now give a little more to Obama. At least there's that...
April 16, 2008 9:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Its corporate media, what did you expect?
A taste of the general debates and Clinton does well.
April 16, 2008 9:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Horrible. Why even have elections, the moderators cannot even frame the damn RELEVANT issues.
April 16, 2008 10:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, there was also that question they asked about the environment.
Ha ha ha, just kidding, they NEVER ask about that!!!
April 16, 2008 10:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Watch Countdown!
April 16, 2008 10:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why, already know what he's going to say.
Clinton bad, Obama good
Clinton devil, Obama angel
Clinton nasty, Obama clean
Clinton hate, Obama love
Cltion big ankles, Obama lovely smile,
Did I miss anything?
Your objective media hardly at work.
April 16, 2008 10:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Apparently we can add Affirmative Action to the list. Geez is Charlie still in 1975????
I dare anyone to find a debate with Affirmative Action as a topic in the last 20 years.
(And I dare anyone to find question on flag pins-ever)
Disgusting.
April 16, 2008 10:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Affirmative action is the "Tell the public you are black and explain to them why you are not qualified" question.
April 16, 2008 10:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm stuck away from my TV right now, gdubs, counting on my computer for info. Please keep us informed!
April 16, 2008 10:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Turn on Olbermann. He's killing it.
April 16, 2008 10:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
That is really a surprise He and Tweety love Obama.
April 16, 2008 10:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
She won? you mean, like Pyrrhus? Please. I don't even understand the whole point of that debate. She can't win the nomination and she won't win the nomination. So really, Weaver and the trolls, can you explain to me the value of the exercise?
April 16, 2008 10:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Who wins?
Who cares? That is the real question.
This is garbage time. Public knows it.
April 16, 2008 10:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
The only person who wins in a debate like this is Republicans and the loser is America.
April 16, 2008 10:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lame debate. The most important thing is that it over. Less than a week until we never have to think about Pennsylvania again.
Although, like Bill Murray in Groundhog Day, I'm slowly coming to like the place.
(P.S. Hillary is Ned Reyerson in this metaphor. Needlenose Ned. Ned the Head.)
April 16, 2008 10:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
I sent an email complaint to ABC half-way through the debate. What has happened to broadcast journalism in America? This was really pathetic!
April 16, 2008 10:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Affirmative action is going to be an issue in November because petitions to ban it will be going on the ballot in five states. So far Obama has tried to side-step the racial aspect of it by shifting the topic to people's income levels, rather than their race. That's a little cowardly, since it is essentially a racial issue. Can't wait to hear what he had to say tonight.
April 16, 2008 10:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Affirmative action is not a racial law, its a law to produce equality for groups of people who have been historically discriminated against. Women and Minorities.
Obama was not side-steping the topic by any means, his support for affirmative action was revising it so it would be based on socialeconomic status than just race-ethnicity.
April 16, 2008 10:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well there"s two hours I'll never get back. What a complete waste of an opportunity.
Seems to me that ABC just spent two hours asking these campaigns to respond to cliques and rumours.
"will you take a 'read my lips' pledge and say NO tax increases on people making less than $200,000." Who died and put this idiot in charge? Who says that not paying a dime more in taxes is our top concern? Are people really saying they'd rather cut benefits for future retirees than pay payroll taxes on income over $100,000!!!
And since when is someone making $175,000 middle class? Especially since we've decided everyone who isn't totally rich is middle class and have lost the term working class and working poor. And we all know how well the 'read my lips' pledge worked.
I'm completely disgusted with these people. Anyone else notice the lack of ethnic and gender diversity on the podium -- not to mention intelligence and insightfulness.
April 16, 2008 10:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
read my lips was unbelievable.
Will you quote a former Republican for lost his job for saying the very thing we're asking you to say right now?
April 16, 2008 10:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well?
April 16, 2008 10:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Look at least the Freepers at FreeRepublic enjoyed the debacle, 1000 posts.. most humorous.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2002643/posts
April 16, 2008 10:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Olbermann reporting that Hannity gave Stephanopolous the Ayers question on his radio show. No kidding.
April 16, 2008 10:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Big post about that on Kos.
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/4/16/13329/3501/457/496866
April 16, 2008 10:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
OH, I wish I could turn on Olbermann--at least I should be taping it right now. But I can't leave the office for another 20 minutes, and can't find a place to watch MSNBC live on the computer.
April 16, 2008 10:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
jefo:
Peter Jennings died...
April 16, 2008 10:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, I love Keith calling Hillary the McCain stand in.
April 16, 2008 10:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
O I think I'd rather not. Thanks. :)
April 16, 2008 10:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
OMG, you think the corporate media and the gop are going to hand over power without a fight?
Are going to be fair?
Reality check.
This is what the general debates will be like.
Need a fighter not a whiner.
Geez.
April 16, 2008 10:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
...and "fighters" need to win the vote.
She isn't. Case closed.
April 16, 2008 10:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
How can you seriously believe that Hillary is anything other than a stooge for the Republican Party, the right wing media, the military industrial complex, and everything rotten to the core in establishment America?
Is Obama up to taking ALL of that on single handedly? Of course not. No one is. But we can fight the good fight.
Hillary is Benedict Arnold.
April 16, 2008 10:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Listen up - as per Atrios: Light 'em up - keep those lines busy all night.
Main ABC switchboard: 212-456-7777
April 16, 2008 10:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh I'm sorry did Charlie Gibson not ask Senator Obama if he'd like a pillow as per Campbell Brown and MSNBC? How inconsiderate of him.
April 16, 2008 10:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'd like a link on that.
April 16, 2008 10:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
I got your link right here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHjFxJVeCQs
April 16, 2008 10:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks. Still can't find the "pillow" comment, though. Can you be more specific?
April 16, 2008 10:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
It happened on Saturday Night Live. I guess things that happen on comedy shows count to the Clinton campaign.
April 17, 2008 1:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
I called and left a message. What a truly embarrassing moment for our country. ABC News has stooped so low, I don't recognize it.
The Democrats should seriously boycott any network which refuses to host a substantive debate.
April 16, 2008 10:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
aintgotaclue - yes, but you see it's just common decency that you don't feed the fucking clips in the AK for your enemy so he can use them to shoot your fellow soldier.
But what the hell do Republicans know about things like that?
April 16, 2008 10:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Please, please, please let this have been the final debate. It'll only get more ridiculous.
April 16, 2008 10:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
SchroedingersCat said:
I am sorry, I do not understand this.
April 16, 2008 10:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Excuse me?
April 16, 2008 10:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
In the post debate interviews, even Hillary supporter, Governor Ed Rendell lacerated George and Charlie for spending the first hour on stupid gotcha questions, instead of asking about the real issues that they voters are concerned about.
April 16, 2008 10:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Poor dumb thing. Still doesn't get it. Never will.
Need 2 million fighters.
And 2 million whiners.
Maybe 3 million...
Here is where you whine:
http://abcnews.go.com/Site/page?id=3271346&cat=ABC%20News%20Specials
And you good folks know where to click to give Barack $25 or $50. It is that time again folks. Let's kick some ABC butt.
Make it so...
April 16, 2008 10:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hilarious.
You think the gop and corporate media are going to play fair in general and just hand over power without a fight?
Wow, unbelievable.
New to politics?
Geez.
April 16, 2008 10:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
You know, I'm beginning to see what The Restoration has based it's campaign on - the Bush Campaign against McCain.
April 16, 2008 10:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
BO got mugged live on ABC tonight.
April 16, 2008 10:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wouldn't trust Charlie Gibson to edit a high school yearbook. Jeebus what a train wreck.
April 16, 2008 10:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
For those of you criticizing ABC, how many of you call Olbermann to complain after his Pro-Bama comments? COME ON.
April 16, 2008 10:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
a new troll - working the nightshift? how's the weather over in Hyderabad?
April 16, 2008 10:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow racist and bigoted Obama supporters. Love that new politics. By the way I am African American not Indian and I am from NY, not Hyperbad.
Barack Obama would probably say your comments epitomize the bitterness of small town america where they are anti-immigrant. I would say your just an ass without generalizing to include everyone in your small town as an ass.
April 17, 2008 9:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
actually KO is pro Obama but I have watched him hit the Obama camp hard as well when they make mistakes. The point about tonight is that nothing substantive was talked about tonight. the first hour was basically a waste.
April 16, 2008 10:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Everyone knows what Olbermann's shtick is.
April 16, 2008 10:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
why do you fake post here?
lol..
April 16, 2008 11:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Will you go compain to Taylor Marsh?
)))))))))))))))))))))-crickets-((((((((((((((((((((((((
April 16, 2008 11:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Seriously - Atrios also has direct links to all the email to all the ABC execs.
Someone said up thread they didn't like to complain? Why not? That's how things get changed. That's how the Religious Right did it.
There's nothing wrong with complaining when they treat us as shamefully as they did tonight with that debacle of RightWing Roast...
April 16, 2008 10:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
dijamo - I honestly gave you the compliment of thinking you were smarter than that - anyone who would defend that disgusting excuse for a debate is really messed up. Sorry.
that was just Right Wing bullshit - start to finish and it's insupportable for a Democrat to think that was in any way ok.
April 16, 2008 10:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ah, go easy. These folks (the actual Clinton supporters, not the GOP trolls posing as such) are so obsessed with being proven right about Obama and Clinton that they actually think it's preferable for the right wing to prevail.
I assume that's due to too much time spent at Hillaryis44, No Quarter and other equally vitriolic sites. They're living proof you really can fool some of the people all of the time.
April 16, 2008 10:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's the thing. These are EXACTLY the issues that will be brought up in the general election. How will Senator Obama be prepared if he is not expected to face them in the primary.
I want a democratic president in office. I honestly believe senator Obama's chances in the general election were shot to hell with the reverend wright comments. This is the FIRST debate he's had to address it in substance (rather than just speechifying on his own terms) and he has still not addressed th actual substance of why he disowned Reverend Wright..errr Reverend Wright's comments.
It's not just that I think Hillary is the best choice - I think Senator Obama has serious issues and I would rather have them addressed now than when it is too late. I also think this debate has exposed his weaknesses GREATLY and even Obama supporters agree which is why you guys are up in arms.
April 16, 2008 10:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm sick of this argument. It essentially boils down to Hannity will say mean things about us so everyone should act like Hannity. How about we demand that the entire media STOP ECHOING RIGHT-WING TALKING POINTS and force the right-wing to do their dirty work on their own time?
Is that too much to ask?
April 16, 2008 10:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
But when Barack Obama uses Republican talking points to attack Hillary's universal healthcare plan you are okay with it. And when Obama's campaign is calling Hillary divisive, can't win because people hate her - that's fine. When Obama supporters on TPM are claiming Hillary killed Vince Foster and accusing her of worse things than even Ken Starr did and you guys say nothing?
Please spare me your moral superiority. You guys lost the right to claim decency a long time ago.
April 16, 2008 10:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ah, so this isn't about grand principles for winning the general. It's about getting even for perceived wrongs (however real).
Glad we cleared that up.
April 16, 2008 10:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Newsflash: I'm one person. I'll treat YOU like one person. Don't put words in my mouth. I responded to YOUR WORDS. You want to throw something out about "you guys." I don't know what you're talking about, but you're certainly not talking about anything that I said, and I wouldn't respond by telling you what "all of you" say, because that wouldn't make a bit of goddamn sense.
April 16, 2008 10:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think this debate was vetting them for the general debates.
It shows why we need a fighter and not a whiner.
They don't listen to Olberman, they have other media.
It is like bringing a knife to a gun fight.
It will get uglier than this debate.
April 16, 2008 10:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
With respect, you are aware that even Clinton support Ed Rendell lashed out at ABC for this debate? That the audience booed the moderators at the end? The the ABC News website has over 4000 comments on this debate from not only Obama supporters, but Democrats and Independents and even GOP members, decrying the lack of substance?
It's fair to ask questions about both candidates, esp. the presumptive front-runner. It's not fair to make them the source of the 1st hour's set of questions, for either candidate. That there was so little substance is -- just as with Bittergate, and even Snipergate -- the ongoing problem with the media. This is just a shining example of how much of a dumpster dive it's become.
April 16, 2008 10:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey Woodrow, can you link me to that story about the comments on ABC?
April 16, 2008 10:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's one quote:
http://www.openleft.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=5199
April 16, 2008 11:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Absolute bullshit.
These are not "issues". They are right wing smears. And in the general, they'll be coming solely from the right wing, not from fellow Democrats.
It's really time to stop excusing Democrats' use of wingnut talking points by saying the GOP does it too.
We can either treat the smears with the deference they deserve--by insisting on substance--or we can wallow in the smears in an effort to help our choice for Democratic nominee.
At least grow up and be honest about your motivations.
April 16, 2008 10:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
dijamo,
Who are you? a Bob Johnson surrogate. Yes, I'm glad you thought the first hour of the debate was somehow relevant given that there was absolutely no discussion of policty... this from a HRC kool-aid drinker who gets annoyed when ppl question the viability of a health care mandate?
You really should be parroting Barack's connections to Tom Coburn the KILL ABORTIONIST Senator. This is your new Talking Point. You are dismissed.
April 16, 2008 10:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree that these things will be brought up, but they are not issues. They are distractions. This is a modern version of roman bread and circuses.
April 17, 2008 1:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Charlie Gibson is a Republican, and Little Georgie Boy is a Clinton agent. Watch the video, and watch how both Charlie and George never interrupted Hillary, but ever time they asked Senator Obama a question, as soon as he start to answer they kept on interrupting him with "but, but". You could tell that they had a hit list of gotcha questions that they wanted to use on him, and they were determined to not let him get his answers out.
April 16, 2008 10:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good point! Been thinking that the much of MSM does not want this to end favorable to Obama; it has to do with power and access to power, and who controls what. They did let Clinton get away on the Bosnia sniper routine was a bit too obvious.
Obama's problem is he too democratic! Or too many folks for the old crowd may loose their seats and never regain them; entrenched power does not give way without serious battles.
April 16, 2008 10:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry, but if any major network ever does this again, I will have my satellite service restricted to PBS and pay a premium if necessary to prevent ABC or their sponsors from entering my household. I can't recall anything as pathetic in my 60 years on this planet. The Democratic Party needs to simply refuse to participate in any more of this total bullshit. Look, I don't give a flying *&%k about lapel pins!
April 16, 2008 10:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Everyone,
Thanks for sparing us west coast people from the pain of watching this. I'm definitely doing something else with my time tonight.
Also, let's not forget that ABC is the same network that put out the controversial 9/11 movie. Corporate media see friendlier skies with McSame.
ooohhh...Royals v. Angels while I'm grading papers, nice.
April 16, 2008 10:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary has no plan to make The Social Security Trust Fund solvent. Her answer was: " I am sure that we will figure out a way to save it". Ready on day one, My Arse!
April 16, 2008 10:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
The social security trust fund is in fact solvent.
Receipts will begin to out pace outlays in, like 2018, and the trust fund will be exhausted in 2042. All that is required to ensure the solvency of the trust fund forever is to raise the SS tax, like, 1%.
Go read the Trustees latest report at the SSA web site.
The problem is that Congress and the president have borrowed from the trust fund and replaced it with USA government securities. So the problem is the budget deficits, not the trust fund.
April 16, 2008 10:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary said that it is not solvent, so are you calling the Heroine of Tuzla a liar. If it were solvent why would she claim that it is not, and that she is sure that she will figure something out. She just does not know what that will be. I stand by my statement: Ready on day one, My Arse!
April 16, 2008 10:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
No. You are mixing up the problems. First, Nixon folded the Social Security fund into the budget, making it look like SS funds cover current accounts. That's just a lie. Second, the trust fund will run out (but I think it is years later than 2018) and, from demographic projections, when it does we won't have enough workers, as against retired people to even cover the benefits for the then-retired (never mind the people who are working then and paying in).
Hillary is afraid to lose votes by saying there is anything wrong -- instead, she says, her blue ribbon commission will wave their wands and fix all. Talk about false hopes. Another lie to win votes.
April 16, 2008 11:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
So when can we start campaigning against Hillary in New York? Shouldn't the Democrats try to take back that Senate seat? It's ashame to have it under the control of Sean Hannity.
April 16, 2008 10:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nothing wrong with starting the process of a candidate search sooner rather than later.
April 16, 2008 10:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think she should stay in the Senate, that will be punishment enough for her vanity: watching other peoples sit in the oval office, having to applaud them when they give the state of the union address, and going there to negotiate legislative packages and attend state dinners. She'll have the rest of her life to chew on what could have been, and blame everybody around her for having screwed her up (instead of looking in the mirror). She'll end up a very bitter and regretful person.
April 16, 2008 10:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
i swear the freakin debates on the Root of all Evil with Lewis Black on comedy central are better then this crap.
April 16, 2008 10:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Where is all the rejoicing over Obama's performance in the debate tonight? I've been all over the web to every pro-Obama site I know, and nobody is saying much. Certainly nobody is saying Obama won. I picked up some stuff about Obama denying that his handwriting was on that gun control questionnaire? But it was! And then there was something about Obama only bringing up the Tuzla issue because he was asked. But then there's proof to the contrary?
Well, the debate should be interesting. It starts here in half an hour.
April 16, 2008 10:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Howard Fineman had the answer on that one. He said that Obama was essentially facing 3 - 4 - 5 on 1. Who are we kidding here?
April 16, 2008 10:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
This debate is proof that the continuing primary is damaging to the entire Democratic party.
April 16, 2008 10:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
the NYT seems to think that the debate tonight was weak on substance because of the moderators
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/17/us/politics/17debate.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
April 16, 2008 10:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
The only consolation was watching Hillary twist on the Bosnia question. Ummmmmmmbuuubuuttwhaaaaaa?
April 16, 2008 10:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
I already addressed that - it is the stupidest excuse going. You don't hand your enemy the clips for his AK to shoot your fellow soldier.
Just that simple.
She's a traitor to the Democratic party and she cannot be elected. She has pissed off more Democrats all over this country than you apparently are aware of. She cannot win - the Archie Bunker Democrats aren't enough and the Republicans vote for real Republicans - every goddamn time, which is why it is such folly to run to them. But you apparently don't get that either.
I withdraw my compliment.
April 16, 2008 10:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
HELLO!!!! THE ENEMY ALREADY KNOWS ALL THIS STUFF AND IS WAITING FOR THE GENERAL ELECTION TO USE IT. You think the RNC had no idea how to attack Obama? The same people who swiftboated John Kerry - a war hero - and you think they couldn't figure this S#!@ out. Have a degree of common sense. It si going to come out one way or another and he will need to address it in an actual debate where he's being questioned rather than just self-righteous oratory that doesn't address the core issues.
You want to nominate Obama and then have this stuff come up when it's too late. Answer the tough questions now not after McCain is cruising to the nomination.
April 16, 2008 10:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Right, but now, because of Hillary, the Republicans get to run around screaming "SEE! SEE! Even other Democrats think ..." and you can fill in the blank with whatever ridiculous non-scandal that has bubbled-up recently.
April 16, 2008 11:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Okay so Hillary is supposed to campaign for Senator Obama while she's still contending for the nomination. Even though Obama started his campaign in a negative manner by saying she's too divisive and unelectable etc; but Hillary is supposed to refrain from maing any criticisms of him.
You do know that this is a primary right? The candidates do not sit around singing kumbayah. The point of a primary is to pick the best candidate for a general election which does not happen when you ignore serious areas of weakness which mught I add originated with Senator Obama's own actions in his stupid ass comments about "bitter" people in small towns and by his inaction in choosing to continue to associate himself with Rev. Wright even after his "controversial comments" Hillary may capitalize on these issues, but make no mistake they are not manufactured by the clinton campaign - they are the responsibility of Obama and they are well within the realm of debate.
April 16, 2008 11:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're really angry. Get a grip.
Don't be so simple. You know very well that's not what the poster above said. You appear reasonably intelligent, so I'm not going to explain why. You already know why, and you're here to pick fights and make snide remarks. Is that the level of discourse we're at, sister?
April 17, 2008 2:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
An anti Obama debate was perfectly fair after the anti Clinton debate on Msnbc. Funny how Obama supporters think what is good for the goose is not good for the gander. Obama has serious issues with some known associates.
April 16, 2008 10:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary has some serious issues with millions of associates -- her fellow Republicans.
April 16, 2008 10:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Even Pat Buchanan admits it was an attack job by ABC.
April 16, 2008 10:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Damn...that about says it all.
April 17, 2008 2:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Putrid.
Liam, my wife walked in late to the debate and asked "is Gibson interrupting them both like that?"
Chuck Todd (looking baked) on MSNBC rightly said that this wasn't Obama's best night. How could it be? Dude was hammered for 40 minutes straight. He still pulled through strong, but I don't think he expected three-on-one, four if you include Hannity.
His response to the Weather Underground was the first time I heard him bring up Bill's pardons, which I consider fair game if HRC wants to claim experience from that era. Good for him.
April 16, 2008 10:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just donated another $25 to Obama.
Seriously disgusted with the corporate media right now. Thank goodness for the internet.
April 16, 2008 10:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
i am watching KO and you know it was bad for BO when PAT BUCHANON is on his side. he is on right now and is saying BO should be pissed
April 16, 2008 10:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
dembillc said: "An anti Obama debate was perfectly fair after the anti Clinton debate on Msnbc. Funny how Obama supporters think what is good for the goose is not good for the gander. Obama has serious issues with some known associates." (would someone please tell me how to use the html tags for the cool quote box?)
First, thanks for recognizing it as an anti-Obama debate. I'm not so sure the MSNBC was as one-sided as this one, though. This one was far more sophmoric and sensational than anything I've seen yet.
More importantly, does staging an "anti-Obama debate" that make it okay?
April 16, 2008 10:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Barry O showed how he can't handle a general election. He's seen nothing. Fox will be on the Ayers story tomorrow as they has it last evening.
April 16, 2008 10:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, I thought he did just fine.
And if we're going to win in the general, we need some backbone. Quaking in fear because Fox "GOP Propaganda" News might be mean to us doesn't qualify.
April 16, 2008 10:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rachel Maddow just called the debate "disappointing and gross." Pretty funny.
April 16, 2008 10:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Did someone say high tech lynching?
April 16, 2008 10:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Do you work overtime to earn your handle?
It's not what she did - it's HOW she did it.
She morphed totally into a Karl Rove Republican right before our eyes.
She's been working up to the metamorphosis for weeks and she just about went all the way to Pat Buchanan land tonight.
Fuck Hillbillary - she cannot win. Too many Democrats will not turn out for her now.
April 16, 2008 10:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, I think Clinton would beat McCain. But her coattails wouldn't be as long as Obama's.
And she's not going to win the nomination, regardless.
All those here (and elsewhere) cheering this "debate" on are cheering for the right wing. It's just that simple.
No matter the excuses, no matter the rationalizations, those who liked the questions tonight put their own pathetic emotional problems ahead of the good of the country.
April 16, 2008 10:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
She's not stupid though. She knows she can't win the nomination. So the only logical point of all this is to damage Obama so that McCain will get elected (and then, she can try again in 4 years as the 'I told you so' candidate). She'd rather let the country go to the crapper with four more years of the Republican freak show than have this upstart push her to the side.
April 16, 2008 10:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
yes
April 17, 2008 2:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
HusseinTenaX says - "She morphed totally into a Karl Rove Republican right before our eyes. She's been working up to the metamorphosis for weeks and she just about went all the way to Pat Buchanan land tonight."
Hillary has been getting slimed by Karl Rove Republican's for many years, the real tragedy is the way the Obama supporters have taken it to a whole new level. I mean I do not recall slimeball Rove stooping to calling her a F*cking Wh*re, at least he had a little class. Obama supporters even slime Chelsea for chistsake, it is like a contest to see how low can they go? Such direction comes from the top on down, Hillary is correct in thinking poorly of this fake hope new direction Oilbama.
April 16, 2008 11:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey! Don't dump on old Pat tonight. Pat is scared that Hillary has just committed us to massive retaliation should Iran look askance at Israel. At least Pat doesn't buy the b.s. that she's going to end war in the mideast. She's just as dangerous as McCain if you want to talk real issues.
April 16, 2008 10:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
WE KNOW THAT - IT'S JUST NOT RIGHT FOR ONE DEMOCRAT TO DO THAT TO ANOTHER.
SHE'S A REPUBLICAN NOW.
quit yelling.
April 16, 2008 10:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
And so when Obama attacks Hillary and calls her divisive and unelectable, he is a republican too? Just want to be sure we are consistent here.
April 17, 2008 12:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
she is divisive and unelectable. she fights with Obama with her arm wrapped around mccain and 50% of the country hated her before this race even began
April 17, 2008 2:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
ABC host heckled after the show
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/16/abc-hosts-heckled-after-d_n_97124.html
April 16, 2008 10:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here is the thing to keep in mind. 58% of Americans say they do not trust Hillary. That means she is toast.
The more that Americans see of Hillary the more the do not trust her. An overwhelming majority of Americans now no longer trust her. They will not elect someone who they do not trust. She can not win in November.
Here is her latest, and all time high negative poll ratings. She is toast.
Clinton's Negatives at Record High
Poll Finds Majority of American Have a Unfavorable Opinion of Clinton
By JAKE TAPPER
PHILADELPHIA -- April 16, 2008 —
Democratic rivals Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., and Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, will square off for the last debate tonight before Pennsylvania voters got to the polls next week.
Clinton is favored to win Pennsylvania, but a new ABC NEWS/Washington Post poll finds her support nationally has further declined.
Likely Democratic voters 51-41 percent say they want Obama to win the nomination -- his biggest advantage to date. Obama has also cleared the "electability" hurdle in Democratic minds -- 62% say he is more likely to win than Clinton.
In more bad news for Clinton, 58 percent of Americans polled said she is not honest and trustworthy. Obama beats her on this attribute by a 23-point margin.
"She flip flops on issues too much and seems like a professional politician whose goal is just to get elected at any cost," said Gene Louin, a Pennsylvania voter standing in line at Geno's Steaks in South Philadelphia.
Added Michael Gold of Westchester, PA, "I do not think Hillary is trustworthy -- not because she's a woman not because she's a Clinton -- not because she's a democrat but because she's a politician."
Clinton's Negatives Hit Record High
A record high of 54 percent of Americans have an unfavorable opinion of the New York senator, according to the ABC News/Washington Post poll.
Her husband, former President Bill Clinton's unfavorability rating is almost as high at 51 percent -- his highest level since leaving office.
"I love Bill Clinton but I'm not happy with the way he has conducted himself," said Mina Bannett of Cherry Hill, NJ.
April 16, 2008 10:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
dijamo,
Who are you? a Bob Johnson surrogate. Yes, I'm glad you thought the first hour of the debate was somehow relevant given that there was absolutely no discussion of policty... this from a HRC kool-aid drinker who gets annoyed when ppl question the viability of a health care mandate?
You really should be parroting Barack's connections to Tom Coburn the KILL ABORTIONIST Senator. This is your new Talking Point. You are dismissed.
April 16, 2008 10:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ahhh there is nothing I love more that Barack Obama supporters who champion getting over the racial "barriers" yet attack black people who don't vote on race to support Obama.
I will champion Hillary's health care mandates any day over Obama's half assed plan and he is lucky that no substantive questions were asked on health care or foreclosures beause Barack would have gotten thrashed.
April 16, 2008 11:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary's finished.
Kaput.
Zero chance.
She's embarrassing herself and the Democratic Party.
Stay tuned for the burial next Tuesday.
Hillary, we hardly knew ye!
April 16, 2008 11:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
I dont think you are a racist, just wrong.
April 17, 2008 1:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Whoa. Who called you a racist? Or an Uncle Tom, for that matter? You're being a victim without being victimized.
April 17, 2008 2:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
STOP WHINING! Do you think this is the last time Obama might face questions not expressly and exclusively on policy. Heck, they are remarkably similar on many policies and we've had 25 previous debates to discuss these. I for one appreciate both of them facing questions about some of the things they've said, people they associate with, and such. It is a shame Obama was resentful and handled it poorly. Deferred even on 2nd amendment, and he a supposed constitutional professor.
Yep, Obama showed he was a lightweight tonight and all of your whining confirms this as you seek to shoot the messenger rather than face that your candidate did extremely poorly, even blatantly lied about his 1996 survey.
Matthew
http://www.TheProblemWithObama.com
April 16, 2008 10:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is hilarious.
Clinton can handle them and Obama showed tonight he could not.
Great debate for the supers.
Let them whine and get it out of the system then they will unite with the fighter because they saw what we are up against.
April 16, 2008 11:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
So, I'll see you at the Obama office when we meet up for canvassing this weekend? Great! Glad you're volunteering.
April 17, 2008 2:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
What are you smoking Mark Penn? Let me ask you, where were the questions about Columbia, NAFTA, her lapel pin, etc... The questioning was atrocious to any objective observer. Some of it was the actual question itself and some of it was the amount of time devoted to ridiculous connections like Ayers.
April 16, 2008 11:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
ABC now stands for Assault Black Candidate.
April 16, 2008 11:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
djamo, the bullshit troll in drag:
I am afraid not fake sista...
Did you major in BS in High school?
You and your Clintons are going to lose in Indiana, Oregon, and, of course, North Carolina. You might even lose Pennsylvania too. Certainly Barack will close within the 10% margin which he so WISELY set as his goal over a month ago.
And let's get one more thing straight: Liberal Historian is right. Obama supportes should complain like one loud hurricane. Obama's campaign isn't about just Barack Obama. It is about millions of us kicking Hillary's ass and McCain's ass, ABC's ass, and yea... your fake black ass too all the way back to Tuzla Timbuktu.
Together we are strong. Whereas you Hillary folk?
Whatcha got? A couple of no-life marginal playing trolls with multiple nicks? Posting around the clock like hamsters masturbating on steroids!
Good luck with that phony sista...
[PS: I got your MAC address. I know who you are and what you are up to. You want to spoof? Fine. But don't spoof a hacker asshat.]
April 16, 2008 11:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
this sounds good.
April 16, 2008 11:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Okay so I assume you believe all black people are supposed to vote for Obama. Eff That. I vote based on policies. I vote based on what I think is best for the country. I do not vote based on Obama being black or Hillary being a woman.
Martin Luther King did not dream of a country where we would vote OR not vote for candidate based on the color of his skin. But that is what your ignorant ass does admittedly by calling me fake and phony for making a different choice.
You are pathetic.
April 16, 2008 11:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
And by the way asshole I am not spoofing - I blog occassionally from home, from by sister (who has a MAC) and during lunchtime at work hence the various IP addresses. What concern is it of yours? STALKER. Is there a TPM restraining order or something? Is there a way to report this asshole? What kind of effing psycho does what you do?
Obviously you have SERIOUS mental problems that your candidate having a bad debate drives you to violate other people's privacy and security. I have no idea what else you intend to do with my IP address. Probably download bomb manuals or something. You come across as very black Unibomber.
Regardless I've reported you to TPM through e-mail. Please get help.
April 17, 2008 12:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
it's cute and funny for trolls, that whole "eff" the 4th amendment thing until it's turned on them. "only criminals should be afraid," they quack.
April 17, 2008 2:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
I stumbled upon a guy on youtube who might be Michael Weaver, no b.s. no rickroll crap. i'm serious.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UaSPQnHUnLQ&feature=related
And even if it turns out not to be, it's a great visual for what his rants sound like in person.
April 16, 2008 11:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
yeah this was the worst debate ever most boring piece of bullshit. I'm exhausted with this whole thing and can't wait for it to be over. Talk about a bunch of meaningless questions -- the only thing they asked them about how they'd actually run the country were hot button issues like taxes and guns. everything else was personality, PR crap, spin, public perception, and mostly things the candidates had already answered exhaustively in the past
April 16, 2008 11:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
dsgv
April 16, 2008 11:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
You and me both. I have never seen such a disgusting display in my life and Bill and Hillary Clinton turning into Dick and Lynn Cheney right in front of my eyes.
It's just sickening, but the choice is so very clear - Hillary-Joe ClintonLieberman or a Democrat - Barack Obama.
She's fucking hung herself with Democrats. It's the stupidest thing I've ever seen.
I'm out
One love
April 16, 2008 11:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lame. Play the Martin Luther King card.
Super lame.
Here is what you should have said:
By the way...
My neck hurts holding this clever position.
How about yours?
April 16, 2008 11:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm sorry asshole - did Hillary criticize Obama for not wearing a flagpin? Go pick your fro, dust off your daishiki and live in Black-erica since you are unwilling to accept diversity of political thought within the black community. I repeat you are by far the most ignorant person I've ever encountered on TPM and that's saying A LOT. You are a real credit to your candidate.
April 16, 2008 11:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sadly, you're not much of a credit to yours. The guy stalking you is a tool, but you're hardly rising above.
April 17, 2008 2:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Like Maya Angelou (another African American Hillary supporter) I am all about rising above. That does not mean allowing to go unchallenged ignorant and bigoted comments like this idiot. He is the epitome of what Geraldine Ferraro and Bob Johnson were direct enough to address - the African American voter who votes on race and nothing else. I repeat IGNORANT. Unlike Barack Obama, I am not one to let ignorant and bigoted or "controversial" comments go unchallenged. Don't get mad at me because this fool perfectly epitmoizes the Reverend Wright wing of Obama's base. I do not purport that all Obama supporters are ignorant like him, but when you allow it to go unchallenged it is as bad as endorsing it and your silence towards him while criticizing me speaks volumes about your own character.
April 17, 2008 8:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
I was BITTER and exhausted ever since she lost her 12 in a row!
April 16, 2008 11:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
And then the GOP and they're swiftboad cronies will find even more.
Realize, they have not begun to fight.
April 16, 2008 11:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
I mean I have been BITTER and exhausted ever since then......I misspoke....(hah)
April 16, 2008 11:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think there are a lot of Obamaistas that didn't take their happy pills toniiiiight....Come on now kids....Repeat after me YES WE CAN ....lol
April 16, 2008 11:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually its Yes, Yes, Yes....He can....lol
April 17, 2008 12:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
ABC news rightfully should question Obama about this "cling to" comments, Fox is looking at the relationship of Obama and terrorist William Ayers and Obama (another legit question). And with regard to the wonderful Reverend Wright, the good REV will remain an issue through the general election if Obama is the nominee. Barry hasn't told the USA just who is Barack Obama?
Thanks for ABC & FOX.
FU: NBC/MSNBC, Tweety, Olbertwitt, Fat Timmy
April 16, 2008 11:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
True enuf.
You got whitey! Love the way you practice what you preach (diversity) in the "black community." Phraud. Phony. Potty mouth.
Now get down on your knees and say "Ah." You got your head tilted just right to make it meaningful.
April 17, 2008 12:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
I am all for diversity except when it's an ignorant ass like you. If all black people should vote for obama, then all white people should vote for hillary by your ignorant ass standards. the we can create a black-erica and a white-erica. That's not a world I want to live in.
So I don't got whitey. I got intelligent people who actually put more thought into their vote than the color of the candidate's skin ASSHOLE. Your limited inelligence can only process black and white versus health care, economic policy, foreclosure policy etc etc etc.
And as for your filthy comments about getting down on my knees, pathetic men with small minds (and let's be honest here small other things as well given that you need to prove your manhood by degrading comments and violating people's privacy) are not the least bit attractive so keep dreaming you scummy misogynist pig. Besides you are already on your knees for Obama and get ready to bend over if he is the nominee because you are going to get F$^$##@ HARD. There is no way in hell he can win the general election. Especially with ignorant ass advocates like you who offer no reason to vote for him other than racial politics.
April 17, 2008 12:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
This racist blame game by the Obama's influenced by Rev Wright is really disgusting for a candidate that promises hope and a new direction. It’s one thing to criticize with concrete examples of why you believe a person is wrong in their view. It’s quite another to simply say that a white person is racist or to call a black person an Uncle Tom if they do not support Obama.
Oh, that’s right. They couldn’t exactly say, “Look at all of the work Obama’s done as Chairman of that Senate Foreign Relations Sub-Committee,” because he hasn’t done a damn thing. They also couldn’t say, “Look at how well he organized those neighborhoods and looked out for minorities in Chicago,” because we should all know by now that he and his pal Rezko sold those folks up the river and let a number of his “constituents” freeze their asses off in the dead of winter due to political expediency. Those were Black asses freezing might I add. You could not even say he opposed Dick Cheney's Energy Bill, the reason gas prices are so high, Obama voted for it.
Obama is for Big Oil and has very little experience period.
April 17, 2008 12:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Anyone else watch their body language? Hillary rolls her eyes upward alot, and goes to her left when she answers questions. And I cant pick up when she is "thinking" about her answer or when she is just talking. Although, she has "primo" sarcasm ability.(not exactly a bad thing in my opinion)
And for the MOST part, Obama looks directly at who he is talking to. You can tell he is thinking when he looks down and flutters his eyes, but when he begins to speak he looks at who he is talking to.
I was raised in such away that when you speak, you look at the person. I dont know...I just thought Id mention it.
April 17, 2008 12:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
That body language did it for me. You could just tell she was flippin off the whole world with it.
April 17, 2008 12:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Did you get your lube out?
You should holla at Bill, let him know that you can take her off his hands.
April 17, 2008 1:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think that is your body language when you lie.
April 17, 2008 1:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Random thoughts on PST debate
Hillary actually gave a good answer on guns. Didn't think I'd say that but knowing both urban and rural folks, I've thought myself that a split in policy could make peace in both lands.
Stephanopoulos just butted into Obama's answer on affirmative action when Obama was saying that racial disadvantages still exist and affirmative action is okay for African Americans, Latinos, ... and then dickhead shouted, "even if they're wealthy!?!" Gotcha town all the way in this Disney spectacular. That single display was just shameful.
April 17, 2008 12:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
He was interupting him all night long, both moderators were!
April 17, 2008 12:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Charlie Gibson ended the debate by pressing the Bat-boy on his relationship with noted environmental terrorist Sasquatch, noting that Chupacabra had insisted that the question was a valid one.
April 17, 2008 12:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
ding. I'm feelin it
April 17, 2008 12:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
great name. I'm tired of dynasties, as well.
April 17, 2008 1:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Who the fuck is Jack Tapper why should I give a shit? I mean...give a real snapshot of the debate, that the American People see, not the crap you WANT us to see.
I REALLY want to take on the Journalist after this political season, they act like the asshole spammers in my email inbox. Like Im so stupid and desperate to think "You can find REAL love tonight...click this link".
April 17, 2008 12:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
First, yes this was a horrible debate, but not because either Clinton or Obama won or lost. And yes, there was little doubt that this was as good as if they had debated on Fox Noise.
Next, yeah: I have no reason to whine. I will do what I normally do, and that is avoid any ABC "news" programming (much as I do most cable "news" and infotainment. I have always felt that boycott is much more effective than leaving messages that are primarily ignored anyway.
Finally, I'm sure most Clinton supporters feel this was a wonderful debate, since having the first 55 minutes focus (with one exception) on all the Obama nontroversies was, well, not really Fair and Balanced. But bottom line for me is simple: I'm going to just chill. This will have just as much effect as the Bittergate nontroversy in "overturning" Obama's lead.
He did look tired, so Hill may have scored some points, but she has the energy infused by her bipolar disorder to buoy her up (and wasn't the sole focus of dogged questions for an hour, which does tend to leave you a little more fresh and crisp.
It was an unbalanced non-debate and both did okay (at least until Hill promised "massive retaliation" if Iran attacked any of our allies in the Middle East. Meaning if the Sunni dominated Saudis (proud sponsors of 14 of the 19 attackers on 9/11) are attacked by those Iranian terrorists, we will commit to global nuclear conflict when Hill gets her finger on the football's trigger.
At least one piece of news came out of the debate tonight, and that was it.
April 17, 2008 1:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
yeah. That "massive retaliation" thing. Another really big reason to never let her itchy finger near that button.
April 17, 2008 1:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
This debate reminded me of how hard it is for even a good team to play well in a badly officiated basketball game against an undisciplined opponent. My guess, and it is just a guess, that there will be a big backlash against the debate itself.
The major story should be that Hillary Clinton apparently is an imperial president wannabe.
What we really learned is a lot about Gibson and Stephanopoulos. I have already stopped watching local TV news and CBS News, so ABC is no real loss.
April 17, 2008 1:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
If we didnt know by now, the media is fucked up. Whats funny is the HRC supporters better be careful with this. They act like all of her controversies went away.....They can dish it out but cant take it. Kinda like the question to her about the last time she fired a gun by the reporter....Yeah, she handled that greeeeaaaaatttt.....You know thats not a relevant...blah,blah,blaaaaaaahhhh
April 17, 2008 2:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
I admit it, I am an Obama supporter. I started out just wanting ANY Democrat to win in November. But, I, a white 60 year old woman (Hillary's base) have come to be impressed by Obama's poise, intellect, ability to analyze, his judgement on significant issues, et al. Most of all, he has run such a great campaign, financially successful, bringing in tons of new voters, and taking the high road when he could have easily gone the other way. Considering the questions raised tonight, I thought he really held his own.
April 17, 2008 2:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hopefully, as Marshall suggests in his last post, the Democrats will take back the debates from the networks by turning them over to "The League of Women Voters," or some other neutral organization. That way, network Tim Russerts can promote their latest book somewhere else.
April 17, 2008 3:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
"...with more wingnut-frame questions, including ones on gun control and even about affirmative action and Obama's well-off daughter."
So basically you are insulting the people who want to better understand Obama's attitude toward the voters he courts, his close association with his controversial pastor and mentor, the people he associates with, his sense of patriotism, his views on gun control, and his views on affirmative action. Sorry, but those are all legitimate issues to explore, and every voter should do so. I know he didn't perform well on any of those answers in the debate, but blame Obama, not the people who are trying to get to know him.
April 17, 2008 4:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh I'm sorry the 4th amendment protects his right to steal my sister's MAC address? Didn't se ethat part in the constitution. Nice to know Obama supporters support this asshole. Hope someone does the same thing to you.
April 17, 2008 6:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama and his minions need to shut up, suck it up, and Barry O needs to grow a pair.
Obama lost the debate, hands down, he plained sucked. What would you expect from an empty suit? Does America want to entrust the POTUS to a 3 year Senator with a manufactured image? Hope not.
April 17, 2008 7:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Despite all the flogging on the part of the moderators, and on the part of Clinton, Obama won last night's debate when Clinton acknowledged when asked, that Obama could beat McCain in November: after being pressured by Steph. she said, "Yes, yes, yes..."
This was after nearly three months of hammering the point that Obama was unelectable, she gave it all back with those 3 syllables. This is what listeners to the debate are going to remember, not all the silly shit about label pins.
And to be fair, when Obama was asked the same question...could Clinton beat the McCain, like the honest person he is, he gave an answer he believed" "Absolutely.."
If only Hillary had a fraction of Obama's class!
April 17, 2008 8:58 AM | Reply | Permalink