Is this the all-Wolfson-all-the-time channel?

The Clinton's thought they had a winner several times before, but the Clinton campaign is all talk and no substance, so this will work against her like all the other crap she's thrown in the past, though was successful, and ended up costing her a demographic.

Hey Greg -- Ben Smith over at Politico quoted Jamie Rubin in the same conference call using the terms "guru" AND "Svengali" to describe Samantha Power. Is that why you made that slip earlier? Is that a seed Rubin's planted before?

As far as this CIC thing goes, Power is right. Clinton will stoop to anything.

Oh, Howard? P.S. What has Hillary "commanded" in her entire career? How do you respond to the Zogby poll that just found Barack is tied with McCain for his "leadership" capabilities at around 34% approval, but Hillary only scores around 16%? You keep saying she's a leader, she keeps saying she has crossed the threshhold, but the voters are not buying your made-up shit.

But, by all means, keep making that shit up, I'm sure it amuses you.

Greg,
Why haven't you addressed the fact that Wolfson lied about his comments comparing Obama to Ken Starr? It seems like that's much more significant than this ridiculous Clinton campaign ad you've posted.

This might get Clinton the nomination, but she'll be crucified in the media when she is forced to adopt Obama's argument in the general.

New name: The Clinton Kamikazee Campaign (tm).

All of our presidents so far have been men, so up to this point only women have had the opportunity to be First Ladies and gain the crucial First Lady experience that makes Hillary qualified to be commander in chief. Obama, as a man, never had any realistic chance to be First Lady. So it's really quite unfair to hold his lack of First Lady experience against him.

Hillary is not just a monster, but arrogant, and is willing to do any thing to get the nomination. She will tear the democrats apart with her continuous hate for Obama. By endorsing McCain with her comments she has revealed her true identity,a Lieberman democrat. The reason she has not released her tax return since the year 2000 is because she and her husband Bill have amassed million of dollars from dubious individuals.

I really wish Wolfson would tell us something we already didn't know like what is in her White House records (i.e. her "experience") rather than Hillary's attack plan. That would be a nice change of pace.

And the media will keep eating it up, and refusing to ask the most obvious question: "what experience do you have to make you qualified to be commander in chief?"

What was Hillary's Iraq vote, Howard?

They need to run an ad using the conference call at which Hillary's staff was asked what foreign policy crisis has teseted her and there was 10 seconds of dead air...

Greg:

Why aren't you also questioning Hillary's claim to be commander-in-chief? She uses her foreign policy, or lack of it, rather, for the commander-in-chief claim. Can we see "fair and balanced" reporting here instead of gleefully reporting Wolfson's talking points?

I had never thought that I would dislike another politician like GW Bush until I discovered the true Hillary. GWB is much nicer than Hillary

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/07/clintons-experience-on-w_n_90398.html

Clinton's Experience On World Stage: "Scant Evidence"
Chicago Tribune/CNN | March 7, 2008 10:46 AM

With a debate raging over which presidential candidate has the most experience and best judgment on world affairs, the Chicago Tribune examines Sen. Hillary Clinton's record:

Pressed in a CNN interview this week for specific examples of foreign policy experience that has prepared her for an international crisis, Clinton claimed that she "helped to bring peace" to Northern Ireland and negotiated with Macedonia to open up its border to refugees from Kosovo. She also cited "standing up" to the Chinese government on women's rights and a one-day visit she made to Bosnia following the Dayton peace accords.

Earlier in the campaign, she and her husband claimed that she had advocated on behalf of a U.S. military intervention in Rwanda to stop the genocide there.

But her involvement in the Northern Ireland peace process was primarily to encourage activism among women's groups there, a contribution that the lead U.S. negotiator described as "helpful" but that an Irish historian who has written extensively about the conflict dismissed as "ancillary" to the peace process.

The Macedonian government opened its border to refugees the day before Clinton arrived to meet with government leaders. And her mission to Bosnia was a one-day visit in which she was accompanied by performers Sheryl Crow and Sinbad, as well as her daughter, Chelsea, according to the commanding general who hosted her.

Whatever her private conversations with the president may have been, key foreign policy officials say that a U.S. military intervention in Rwanda was never considered in the Clinton administration's policy deliberations. Despite lengthy memoirs by both Clintons and former Secretary of State and UN Ambassador Madeleine Albright, any advice she gave on Rwanda had not been mentioned until her presidential campaign.

Clinton's Experience On World Stage: "Scant Evidence"
Chicago Tribune/CNN | March 7, 2008 10:46 AM

With a debate raging over which presidential candidate has the most experience and best judgment on world affairs, the Chicago Tribune examines Sen. Hillary Clinton's record:

Pressed in a CNN interview this week for specific examples of foreign policy experience that has prepared her for an international crisis, Clinton claimed that she "helped to bring peace" to Northern Ireland and negotiated with Macedonia to open up its border to refugees from Kosovo. She also cited "standing up" to the Chinese government on women's rights and a one-day visit she made to Bosnia following the Dayton peace accords.

"how many "Wolfson says: . .. " stories do we need?"

Exactly.

Greg = Clinton talking points all the time

Why can't you vet and fact check anything these clowns say? Where's their cred? Easter egg hunt? White House Xmas tree?

And how is Clinton prepared to be Commander in Chief?

You know, this "red phone" bullshit is really starting to wear on me. How many times in the 230+ years of our history has a president ever had to make a Jack-Bauer type snap decision, by himself, at 3AM? That number would be - NEVER!!!!! Not even during the Cuban Missile Crisis did Kennedy have to make that kind of decision (and we had nukes, what, 90 miles away from us pointed directly at us!) Not even during the goddamned attack on the World Trade Center on 9/11 did Bush have to make that kind of decision (other than deciding to continue reading My Pet Goat for 10 minutes after he heard of the first attack). And for those who will say, "well, we're fighting a different kind of enemy now", there WAS advance warning of the 9/11 attack - Bush and his minions just never read the f**king NIE or they would have been fully cognizant of the fact that Al-Qaeda had every intention of hitting us when they did. There is always a "crisis" that proceeds any type of attack, and someone, somewhere is always given a heads-up. There are meetings with high-level Cabinet members, military personnel, etc. before any decision is made (how long did it take for us to retaliate in Afghanistan - almost a month after 9/11!) For Christ's sake, can we not look at this rationally?

And what President ever has the kind of experience that would prepare him/her for the highly unlikely scenario of a 3AM snap decision (which, I repeat, has never occurred)? I'm sure that if things were that critical there is some kind of procedure or protocol, for God's sake. This is just so ludicrous and it boggles the mind that so many Americans buy into this nonsense. A great many of us seem to be suffering from severe, long-lasting post-traumatic stress disorder and we have lost our ability to reason. This ad is the worst kind of propaganda and manipulation, worthy of Dick Cheney and Karl Rove. Do you Hillary supporters really enjoy your candidate's tactics being compared to those two monsters'?

Yo Obama fans!
TPM Election Central posts a continuous stream of news items. Like it or not Wolfson's yadda yadda is news.
Now if your argument is that the Obama camp is not being given equal time then you need to point out the conference call or major speech or whatever that was ignored. Please! I think I am safe to say that TPM will appreciate all hot tips!
But lots of the criticism is simply that HRC's campaign gets any coverage that isn't unfailingly negative.
But really, HRC is not Evil Incarnate, the Spawn of Satan, or Hitler Redux. Even if sometimes she does sorta come across that way.

"But really, HRC is not Evil Incarnate, the Spawn of Satan, or Hitler Redux."

You're right. She's just ferociously trying to be the next Mondale.