« Obama Wins Mississippi, Networks Say | Home | Democrat Carson Wins Special Election; Only 2nd Muslim Ever Elected To Congress »

Wolfson On Ferraro's Latest: "We Have Made Clear That We Reject Her Remarks"

I emailed Hillary spokesperson Howard Wolfson to ask if the campaign has a reaction to Geraldine Ferraro's latest, in which she said: "Racism works in two different directions. I really think they're attacking me because I'm white."

Wolfson's response:

Ms. Ferraro is speaking for herself. We have made clear that we reject her remarks.

The closest that the Hillary camp has come to rejecting Ferraro's remarks was when she said today that she does "not agree" with what Ferraro said and added that it's "regrettable" that supporters on "both sides" say such stuff.

Separately, Hillary campaign manager Maggie Williams went in the other direction, suggesting in a statement that the Obama camp was playing the race card by criticizing Ferraro's remarks, which is hardly a rejection, obviously.

Late Update: Ferraro defends herself on Fox tonight, and doesn't do Hillary any favors in the process...



Comments (263)

If the Clintons wont deal with Ms Ferrero, then BO needs to rehire Ms Power, end of story....

avatar

Call me cynical but this misses the point. I suspect the Clinton campaign has looked at the remaining contests, looked at the percentage African-American vote in them (low for the most part), and has decided that going racially divisive favors her chances of picking up delegates.

Of course it is a terribly short-sighted, put Hillary's interests ahead of the interests of the Democratic party decision, but I think her campaign figures that pushing this line of argument will result in substantially lower Caucasian support for Obama--especially among blue-collar, lower-income white voters.

As to how it all plays out, we will see but I am sick to my stomach just watching it all happen.

I don't think so. I think Ferraro has just lost her marbles. I actually expect the Clinton campaign to dump her soon. We'll see I guess.

On the other hand, they do have trouble criticizing their fund raisers. Look at how they defended Bob Johnson.

Ferraro has been very ill and this may partially account for this unfortunate and unsavory outburst. Nevertheless the Clinto campaign holds Obama to one standard and itself to a markedly lower standard. I don't know if they plabnned this (as far as I know) but it seems clear they are more than willing to take advantage of it.

They rejected, but didn't denounce, and Ferraro is (as far as I know) still associated with the Clinton campaign.

avatar

The thing that gets me is how incredibly stupid Ferraro's comments are.

Yes, her statements are racist, but they don't even make any damn sense.

There has been what, 3 African American Senators since reconstruction? Yet somehow Obama's blackness is helping, not hurting, him? How'd'ya come by them apples?

Completely agreed. Ferraro's point is that she wasn't speaking in the capacity as a Clinton superdelegate. Well, Powers wasn't speaking in her capacity as an Obama adviser, but she still got fired.

Powers should be rehired immediately.

what?! the point is that hillary wont distance herself from geraldine COMPLETELY after she continues her hateful talk, not that it what she said is ok OR that what Ms. Powers said is ok. both are reprehensible statements. what's worse is that mean geraldine wont back down. faux news has gotten the better of her ego.

the clinton camp seems to be taking this race from the gutter directly to the waste water treatment plant in a hurry. time for obama to stock up on algae.

avatar

A common mistake: Stephanie Power (singular) is the good-looking Pulitzer Prize winner, and the once and future Obama advisor. Stephanie Powers (plural) is the good-looking actress who co-starred with Robert Wagner on television's "Hart to Hart".

avatar

Sorry -- of course that should be SAMANTHA Power.

"Separately, Hillary campaign manager Maggie Williams went in the other direction, suggesting in a statement that the Obama camp was playing the race card by criticizing Ferraro's remarks, which is hardly a rejection, obviously."

Reeks of Rove...

They have a very organized campaign.

Howard Fineman gets it...Watch Olbermann

Disgusting


The Clintons, after tonight, need to win 64% of delegates in every state.

If the frog is on the fence post, the last dog is about to die

They need 64% to catch up in the delegate count - but not to win. Closing the gap is important, but we're essentially still talking about a tie. What HRC needs is another Ohio-sized win in PA, FL, and MI. All Clinton needs to do is demonstrate that she has the momentum (which also would demonstrate that Obama can't handle the hard hits and below the belt punches). With the momentum going into the convention, she'll have the ability to scour away many of Obama's delegates and pull out a win. This is the strategy, because she and everyone else knows that no one will win this before the convention. This is her only hope.

Obama needs to not cry foul over race each time the opportunity comes up. This plays into Clinton's hand in the remaining states. Instead, he should counter the argument with facts such as his winning white votes, white states, and that in most states he's won, blacks account for a small percentage of the vote. Don't get angry, just prove that race isn't a factor, and discredit GF and others who claim it.

avatar

"What HRC needs is another Ohio-sized win in PA, FL, and MI."

Sorry to burst your bubble: Hillary netted nine delegates out of her strong Ohio win. She could pick up as many out of PA, FL and MI, recapture the 10 extra supers she'd get from the FL and MI delegations being seated -- and still trail Obama by 100+ total delegates. To get within reasonable striking distance of Obama, she needs to win PA, FL, and MI by 20 points at least, not by 10.

Olbermann will have a "Special Comment" about the Clinton campaign Wednesday, he just announced.

Oh really?

I wonder if Keith will be wearing his little girly cheerleading outfit and bring his pom poms while he does his kicks and cheers for Obama. That girly man just loves his Obama man.

Hillary's campaign is flip-flopping on rejecting racism. Who's in charge Maggie or Wolfbreath?

Hillary disagrees.
Maggie says Obama is playing the race card.
Wolfson rejects Ferraro's remarks but not her cash.

Seems like the Clinton team isn't playing off the same playbook at the moment.

Wolfson talks out of the left side of his mouth (good cop) and Maggie Williams is talking out of the right side (bad cop).

And never the twain shall meet.

When I see these conflicting statements, I alternate between thinking the Clinton camp is really clever or completely inept.

avatar

(from Ben Smith's blog) from April 15, 1988's Washington Post, an old quote from Geraldine Ferraro:

"If Jesse Jackson were not black, he wouldn't be in the race"

wowwwwwwwwww

To hell with her and her cocaine dealing offspring.

If Clinton does not respond strongly against Ferraro, she is beyond contempt. She will do anything to win.

avatar

If Hillary does not fire her or ask her to leave her campaign, she will be ruined. She will then be associated with racism as McCain has with anti-catholic and anti-jewish bigotry. She cannot just say that they do not agree with this point of view. I mean come on. Remember politics 101 says that sometimes political gaffes sometimes can be the obvious truth, of which you cannot speak of. It would be exactly the same as if Obama came out and said Hillary is where she is today because of her husband. Everyone knows it but it is so bad to say because it is below the belt. BTW it was just announced by msnbc that Obama got blacks 9 to 1. Wonder if this had any effect on this?

avatar

Okay, we want Samantha Power back then, if a verbal slap on the wrist is all we need, let's get Power back.

How can you reject those comments, but then accuse Obama of playing the race card. It makes no sense.

LMAO. You expected sense where political advantage can be wrung from nonsense? The Clintons are a lot of things, but above all they are opportunists.

The more different things you say, the more likely it is that some narrow demographic wedge will hear something it likes. That's how she campaigned back when she was still inevitable. Why does it surprise us they're reverting to type when their backs are against the wall?

We are watching the Clinton Legacy go down the drain right before our eyes...

avatar

"Barbara Bush, when asked what she thought of Ferraro said she couldn't respond, however, the word she was thinking of rhymes with "rich"[10]. Later that evening Mrs. Bush called Ferraro to apologize for allegedly calling her a "witch"."
- Wikipedia

Maybe she's just a loudmout jerk?

Also I thought this b---- word was a taboo for feminists? Nice hypocrisy.


avatar

I am no fan of the Clintons.

But I had reconciled myself to voting for Hillary if she were the nominee, thinking that we just cannot endure another Republican administration.

Now I honestly don't think I can vote for her. To quote ee cummings' Olaf, "There is some shit I will not eat."

avatar

From Ben Smith at Politico:

A Ferraro flashback


"If Jesse Jackson were not black, he wouldn't be in the race," she said.

Really. The cite is an April 15, 1988 Washington Post story (byline: Howard Kurtz), available only on Nexis.

Here's the full context:

Placid of demeanor but pointed in his rhetoric, Jackson struck out repeatedly today against those who suggest his race has been an asset in the campaign. President Reagan suggested Tuesday that people don't ask Jackson tough questions because of his race. And former representative Geraldine A. Ferraro (D-N.Y.) said Wednesday that because of his "radical" views, "if Jesse Jackson were not black, he wouldn't be in the race."

Asked about this at a campaign stop in Buffalo, Jackson at first seemed ready to pounce fiercely on his critics. But then he stopped, took a breath, and said quietly, "Millions of Americans have a point of view different from" Ferraro's.

Discussing the same point in Washington, Jackson said, "We campaigned across the South . . . without a single catcall or boo. It was not until we got North to New York that we began to hear this from Koch, President Reagan and then Mrs. Ferraro . . . . Some people are making hysteria while I'm making history."

so there is a 20-year history of her making racially charged statements. as borat would say: nice.

Ferraro says Obama is lucky he is black because otherwise he would be a nobody: so according to "THE CLINTONS" Obama is playing the race card by calling Ferarro out. Pure Karl Rove tactics: Attack what is RIGHT about a person, not what is wrong. Ferraro makes a racially negative, dismissive, and ignorant comment --> Obama campaign reacts. Ergo...


Obama is hyper-sensitive -- not like Hillary who doesn't let ANYTHING GO!

They sound more like the Bush regime every day.

Two options:

1. Do they actually PAY Karl Rove, or do they just have to note him in their bibliography?

2. Or is he just an unpaid advisor, hoping to get Hillary as the nominee so the repubs can win?

Umm, Greg, that was a pretty odd way to recount what Clinton said. Here's the full quote from the source you cited:

"I do not agree with that. It is regrettable that any of our supporters on both sides, because we’ve both had that experience, say things that kind of veer off into the personal. We ought to keep this on the issues. There are differences between us. There are differences between our approaches on health care, on energy, on our experience, on our results that we’ve produced for people. That’s what this campaign should be about.

Granting that what she said was ungrammatical, it still does not equate to what your parsing implies: "...she does 'not agree' with what Ferraro said and added that it's 'regrettable' that supporters on 'both sides' say such stuff."

Clinton didn't suggest that both sides use race baiting language. She was obviously referring to the Power flap and the Monster comment. Why break up what she said in a misleading way? Odd... or maybe just sloppy.

avatar

I think she was referring to the Farakhan endorsement of Obama. Yet, intriguingly, she didn't reject and denounce Ferraro.

avatar

Could somebody tell Pat Buchanan to get some mental health help? He's claiming to speak for women my age. Just for the record: I'm 51 years old, a feminist, and I voted for Obama in my primary. By the way, GO NANCY PELOSI!!!!!!!!!! She's been fending off telecommunications company immunity, and her remarks about Clinton today were right on!!!!!

whenever Pat Buchanon comes on i press the mute button...All he does is spew out the Republican talking points - Hillary is good, Obama only has the AA vote...Those Republicans really want Hillary to win this nomination...

Pat Buchanan is a racist, an anti-semite, and in general an antediluvian waterhead. He's a moral liability for anyone who hires him.

And she's also fending off Cindy Sheehan. But what does Cindy know?

Wolfy is Client # 10.

Ok, I've crunched some numbers and Ferraro may have a point.

As with the delegate count, it's all about the math: http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/03/heres-the-evidence-black-voter.php

Numbers don't lie people.
(sarcasm)

avatar

You could say the Democratic Party has unfair advantage because most African Americans are Democrats. What is the problem? You have to be pretty naive to think the Whites in Mississippi were going to vote for Obama. Look at the amount of crossover vote Obama got in Virginia. White folks vote for white folks all the time. Barack’s issues are issues that face the entire nation. Why are we trying to make it anything else? Obama won Wyoming; I haven't heard anyone complain, the entire AA electorate of that state is only about 1%.

I'm confused or problably naive. I don't see a problem.

she hasn't Rejected it with a capital R, nor has she Denounced it with a capital D. We need some R&D.

avatar


This whole charade is being orchestrated by the Hillary campaign. No need to doubt that. That Greg has to play along with their game is unfortunate but that is part of the rules for reporters dealing with campaigns. The rest of us should realize that this is the face of the Hillary campaign. It is ugly. Look at it in revulsion. And act accordingly.

Ferraro :

"I'm on Hillary's finance committee. I've done a fundraiser for her here at my firm. And I went and worked the phone banks before Super Tuesday. I have to tell you, this is a very emotional campaign for me,"

Wolfson's response:

Ms. Ferraro is speaking for herself. We have made clear that we reject her remarks.

Speaking for herself?
Who is this fool trying to fool?

avatar

"Both sides?" What crap! That's Republican talk! Don't take responsibility for the actions of your campaign and claim that "everyone does it!"

avatar

Geraldine Ferraro is comparing her selection to be the VP candidate to where Senator Obama is today, and claiming that she was only the VP candidate because she is a Woman, and that Senator Obama is only where he is because he is a black man.

Here is the difference, and it is a huge one.

Voters did not elect Geraldine Ferraro into the VP slot. She did not run in any primaries, so yes she got picked without having to earn it.

Senator Obama has had to run a fifty state national campaign and earn ever vote and delegate that he has obtained. He started out as a huge underdog against a very tough slate of opponents, including Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton who was dominating all the polls.

He earned every vote that he has received.
No one ever got to cast a vote to make Geraldine Ferraro the VP candidate.

Geraldine Ferraro, you race baiting creep, you were the one who got special treatment because of your gender.
Senator Obama has had to work his way to the top and earn every vote along the way. He is a great American, and you are disgraceful failure. Shut up and go away.

avatar

Sadly, I agree with the people who think that Ferraro's remarks are deliberate in their race-baiting and that Hillary is unwilling to fire Ferraro because she is quite happy to embrace a racist agenda as a potentially winning card.

The Mississippi exit polls make it very clear that there are a lot of Whites who are rallying around Clinton BECAUSE she is not Black.

The numbers, sadly, are on Clinton's side in PA and elsewhere. Evidently she has crunched the numbers and has no hesitation about using an underhanded racist agenda get her the nomination.

But the Democratic leadership would be making a tragic mistake in pursuing this strategy. Not only will they lose Black voters in November; they will also lose the votes of those of us who are not Black but who cannot and will not vote for a candidate who is overtly racist even if she is a Democrat.

The Clintons are and always were junk-yard dogs: they will do anything to win, however base. And if they cannot win, they just don't care about what the costs are to the Party of the country.

avatar

I am with you on that. If Hillary gains the nomination through such racially divisive tactics, I will do all in my power to make sure that she ends up eating Jim Crow in November.

avatar

The Mississippi exit polls make it very clear that there are a lot of Whites who are rallying around Clinton BECAUSE she is not Black.

Or it could be because they are Republicans who want McCain to run against Hillary this year.

But it's probably a mixture of the two, I'd guess.

GMan08, I think it's clear enough from Greg's synopsis that he isn't trying to say HRC says both sides are race-baiting, just that both sides get trashy with each other.

I can only reflect on how I interpreted his sentence, and it read to me like HRC was trying to say that both her and O's campaign have made racist remarks. Not saying Greg did it intentionally, but it seems ambiguous enough to me, without having read the actual statement, that it was a poor choice of how to summarize what she said. Just sloppy.

I'm looking forward to that. Olbermann seemed genuinely disturbed when he heard Fineman's view that this is part of a deliberate strategy on the part of the Clinton campaign (their total unwillingness to cut Ferraro loose with all deliberate speed and due contempt makes Fineman's statement ever more clear by the hour).

I only hope he pours everything he's got into that commentary tomorrow night; God knows someone in the MSM has to speak out against this horror.

avatar

I think going for the racist vote helps Clinton in PA and so she is going for it! It's a new, unforgivable low. I was thrilled to see Nancy Pelosi's comments - now there is a fellow Italian woman I can be proud of!

She isn't merely going for the racist vote, she is inciting and legitimizing and affirming the racist vote by running a racist campaign.

avatar

I think Hillary's response to this was fine. They can't really fire her since she's just a supporter. Still, I'd like to see every company she's associated with cut ties with her (including Fox News, though that's unlikely)

Geraldine Ferraro is a nasty old white woman. We wouldn't be attacking her if she wasn't.

Let's all take a step back, for a second.

Look at the bigger picture.

Ferraro is saying:

a) Obama is black. He gets the black vote.
b) Hillary is a female. She gets the female vote.

I, myself, being a white woman over 40 who lives with and loves a black man, should really be torn, I suppose.

So why is it that I've been an Obama supporter and campaign donor for a year, and why is it that I voted for Obama in the NY primaries in Westchester County?

Does this mean I am not a real American woman?

That's not what she said. She said Obama is successful because he is black. This is horrible. To emasculate his ability to manage his campaign is subtly racist. To discredit his intelligence is racist. I'm horrified.

Then to say that she is being attacked because she is white? This is so horrendous, I can't even begin to start. What about African-Americans being lynched up until the 60s? What about the fact that we still have an issue of lynching symbols requiring a Republican president to speak out against it? That is ridiculous for her to even imply that.

As a minority born in Spooner Wisconsin and growing up in white Suburbia Minnesota, I've felt my share of subtle racism. This is it. And no matter how you cut it, if you support this type of thinking, you are racist - plain and simple.

No one can erase the memories of..

"well he's only smart at math (don't laugh being Asian in Minnesota sucked) that's why he'll do good (I did best in my "liberal arts" classes)).

"Hey, you're asian.. tell the class about Japan (I'm not from Japan)."

"Do you eat dogs at home?"

"Come here chink boy... get off my lawn and tell your dad to go back to where he came from."

It was endless. It was horrible. I hated it. And it never needed to be obvious. It was often subtle. I simply cannot believe this. I just can't imagine that a Democrat would not patently reject with a capital R.

Thank Clinton for splitting the party on racial lines - do not blame Obama... he never split the party on racial or gender lines - those who think he does... they're deluding themselves.

I'm am so embarrassed to be a Democrat right now. I'm depressed beyond belief about this. And I'm sure that a bunch of people will say snarky and below the belt things about my commentary.. but if you haven't experienced racism first hand... you won't know.

Definitely appreciate the commentary, neo. As a middle-aged white guy, I've never had to deal with any "isms". The kind of innuendo coming from Ferraro is despicable, and I'm ashamed we Caucasians haven't gotten past reverting to an inexcusable core crutch like racial discrimination. What delusion can possibly justify racial superiority or animus? It makes no sense to me, and I'm sorry that it's still going on after the hard work of Dr. King and all those who have continued to advocate for color-blindness. I don't say this out of political correctness, I say it because I know there are some absolute truths we can't deny, and one is that skin color should not be a factor in how we interact as human beings.

avatar

While I agree deep breathes are in order, she is not saying that Barack gets the Black vote.

She's saying he's unqualified to be a presidential candidate and only surviving because he's black. A white candidate with his record wouldn't be in his position. Just like she was only chosen to be VP because she was a women, not that she was qualified.

While there might be interest and potential value in dissecting the actual effect of race and gender, her comments were not meant as an inroad to such a conversation. While I'm much more inclined to ignore the comments as that of a crazy old white woman has-been, the fact that the Clinton campaign is incapable of coming out and saying that she's got problems is disappointing.

It reminds me of the false accusation against Obama's voting record on woman's rights, the near hysterical memo's from other woman's groups, and the general dismissive attitude and racially tinged rhetoric of her campaign.


Deep breath? is that what you do when you hear someone say the "n" word? is that what you do when a mccain supporter asks how they are going to beat that b**** in nov? there is no time for deep breaths. ferrarro defended her remarks which implied that affirmative action is the only reason obama is where he is today. is it beyond repulsive. sour grapes. i guess the champagne is going bad...

Maybe we should stop throwing the affirmative action meme around. Ferraro was clearly talking about the fact that the black vote and proportional delegate selection have kept Obama in the race. Why are you bringing up affirmative action?

Of course not. You don't have to worry about that until Clinton starts consistently getting 90% of the woman vote. Apples to apples please.

avatar

Ferraro's remarks
The Clinton campaign's non-denial denial
Ferraro's second round of remarks
The Clinton campaign's accusing of Obama injecting race into the campaign
The unearthing of Ferraro's comments about Jesse Jackson from 1988
Robert Johnson waxing eloquent on Obama's teenage drug use
Bill Shaheen's waxing eloquent on Obama's teenage drug use
Bill Clinton attempting to marginalize Obama as a black candidate after South Carolina


Hi, Hillary Clinton. Race-bait lately? It couldn't be a campaign strategy, could it? Nah...

avatar
Separately, Hillary campaign manager Maggie Williams went in the other direction, suggesting in a statement that the Obama camp was playing the race card by criticizing Ferraro's remarks, which is hardly a rejection, obviously.

Still with this, Greg, _still_? Just pounding away and pounding away until by sheer force of repetition it just has to be true? The statement suggests NO SUCH THING. Ben Smith said it did, and you parroted him, and Kos parroted him, and now it's blogospheric wisdom, once again, even though the statement says NOTHING LIKE THAT.

Read it. I'm begging you, read the damn thing. Then explain your interpretation. Don't just read it pre-framed by Ben Smith and then pass it on, frame intact, without using some critical thinking of your own.

avatar

I just read it and it's really unclear what Williams was saying. It could certainly be interpreted as Ben and others took it, where "false, personal and politically calculated attacks" referred to the Obama campaign's complaints. The alternative is that she was referring to Ferrero's comments. The context seems to imply the former though.

avatar

Actually, I do think that Williams was saying that the Obama campaign response was a personal attack on Clinton. But to get from that the idea that Williams was accusing the Obama campaign of counter-race-baiting requires a leap that no one has justified.

IMHO Williams is saying, OK, yes, Obama campaign, you made your point, we said we disagreed with Ferraro, and we're ready to move on, but you won't let it drop, and you seem to be milking it for all it's worth. We've taken our licks, so knock it off already.

She did not say anything like, "Once again the Obama campaign cries 'racism.'" But all over the blogs people are reacting as if she did. And they're not showing their reasoning.

Should the Clinton folks rightfully expect the Obama folks to let it drop? No. Did they bring a lot of this on themselves for the Farrakhan reject-and-denounce nonsense? Yes.

But Williams did not accuse the Obama campaign of playing the race card, and TPM should stop spreading that around.

Ok, I have been sick of the clintons since the 90's, but I am really sick of them now. Really, really.

This statement says it all:

Separately, Hillary campaign manager Maggie Williams went in the other direction, suggesting in a statement that the Obama camp was playing the race card by criticizing Ferraro's remarks, which is hardly a rejection, obviously.

How can anybody with a brain support these monsters? They are monsters and could care less about people, the country and the democratic party. All they care about is their own self aggrandizement.

If we have to have a woman nominee to satisfy the feminists and women in the party who are so bent on a woman regardles of the fact that the woman is a lying, disgusting animal, I hereby nominate Nancy Pelosi for President. Pelosi would make a great president, as would obama. Clinton would be pathetic even if she got that far, which she wouldn't. Pelosi for President!!!!! That would be a compromise, with obama as VP. That would shake up the country and I guarantee that obama would be her VP.

One other point, where in the f*ck has this woman been for over 20 years?????? I can't believe that anyone pays attention to her. This is a total joke.

I think the Clinton campaign thought they could thread the needle with this one. Just as they "denounced" the circulation of the Somali photo of Obama while arguing that the larger point was correct and the press would have been all over Hilary for the same thing - they thought they could "reject" the Ferraro remark while claiming that Obama was playing the race card. Then Ferraro kept repeating the statement and hers similar historical statements came out and the whole affair blew up in their face.

I think they were trying to play cute with the racist dogwhistle stuff and they got called out on it. I'm certain they are not happy with these developments.

avatar

Guess I'm the only one who heard her say " I'm a person who is for discrimination for 40 years" in that video

She certainly isnt making anything better for Clinton. Cant wait for Olbermann tomorrow.

I'll also say, I was skeptical of the Obama campaign's decision to call shenanigans on this but I think it has worked in exposing the dark underbelly of the Clintion playbook.

Wolfson is a son of a bitch.

10:43....now its 58% to 39%.

I shall sleep well tonight.

"Didn't do Hillary any favors"


Sheesh...what a naif

The frog didn't git on that fence post unless the last dog put it there.

Ah, but note that they don't denounce them.

Here's another gem from the Faux interview- she basically threatens not to raise money for Obama if he is the nominee. Is this a joke?! Has she never heard of the Internet? Is it because of people like this that Clinton has been behind in fundraising?

Turn the page, Democrats, let's start a new chapter in American History.

The Clintons are parasites

avatar

It is sad that it is now confirmed that Geraldine Ferraro is a racist.

It is sad that SHE USED THE SAME WORDS AGAINST JESSE JACKSON in 1988 and joined Koch, Ronald Reagan in diminishing Jackson's candidacy.

It is sad that she made these comments ON FOX NEWS, and went back to defend herself again on FOX NEWS.

It is sad that Maggie Williams, the devil's advocate, fervently defended her.

It is sad that Hillary Clinton has refused to show some spine.

It is a shame that this is coming from Democrats, NOT Republicans.

It is a pity that majority of Hillary Clinton supporters and voters are racists .... yes .... racists.

It is unfortunate that what we never knew about Geraldine Ferraro, may be what we don't know about Hillary Clinton.

The full story is here:
http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/BUSTED_Ferraro_made_SAME_racist_comment_about_Jesse_Jackson

avatar

They know just what they are doing - speaking to two constituencies.

1. Get media to calm down by saying they have rejected when they haven't really done that too much

2. Get segment of population to think racially - helps them.

avatar

I am a snark addict, but this is just sad. This is not what the Democratic party--at least in theory--is supposed to be about. Congrats to Obama on Ole Miss.

The Clinton campaign is following a formula created by Bill in South Carolina: when in doubt trash Obama for being Black. When you called on your petty and small-minded racist act -- puff up and behave as if this is a scurrilous charge being concocted by a sensitive Black guy or in Jerry Ferraro's case -- claim reverse racism.

It is all so very sick and transparently racist that it makes me wonder how long it will be possible for Bill Clinton to keep his office in Harlem.

I'm reminded of Dick Gregory's take on all of this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAcN5iKArQU

Now is the time, Unpledged Superdelegates (yeah, I'm looking at you) to take a stand.

Do you approve of Ms. Ferraro's rhetoric and its place in the Democratic party, or do you denounce and reject it?

Yeah, I'm looking at you. Time to pi$$ or get off the pot.

To those of you saying "we should get Power back":

I think it would behoove the Obama campaign to behave in a manner more upright than the Clinton campaign, not to base its behavior on that of the Clinton campaign.

Similarly, I don't actually think that Obama should be calling for the Clinton campaign to get rid of Ferraro in the first place.

Rather, I think that he should be saying something like (but phrased more velvet-hammery than) "Senator Clinton is well within her rights to retain the services of any adviser, no matter how abhorrent that person's statements may be. That's Senator Clinton's decision, not mine."

avatar

Agreed.

Ditto. They have to stop playing the clintons' game. They have been doing so well until this ferraro bs. Just keep saying that they take the clintons at their "word." Everyone with half a gd brain knows how much that is worth, Zippo.

On anothe note, I guess fox entertainment is vying to be the new clinton news network. Major competition between the two right-wing corporate media conglomerates. Pathetic.

avatar

People are arguing that Obama should pack his unity speech in, but now might be the perfect time to use it. He should use Ferraro's depressing comments as the jumping off point for a reminder that he is the candidate of everyone.

Slip in "Judgment" somewhere in there.

avatar

Free publicity. Hillary must be woefully short of cash.

avatar

IMHO, Hillary's unwillingness to unambiguously reject, renounce, disavow and condemn Ferraro's execrable comments (plural) would, in a just universe, prove as politically fatal as George Allen's "Macacca" moment.

The party elders need to start leaning on Hillary E. Coyote behind the scenes, or something. The Dem party shouldn't have to countenance her pulling this ACME-instant-southern strategy crap for the next six weeks.

avatar

This should be proof that HRC doesn't give a damn about the party's chances in November. Dean, Gore, and the rest of leadership need to grow a pair and get her out of the race now.

I don't think she'll go by just being asked by the party leadership. The Supers need to take a stand and grow a pair and run far, far away from HRC's dirty campaign. This could hurt them, too, not by compromising the November election, but their own political careers as well.

I don't know what the policy on censorship is here, but can I be the first to say: Geraldine Ferraro, Go Fuck Yourself.

Nice excuse Wolfson--learning from McCain and Hagee, huh?

Maybe Roger Stone was right about Hillary all along...and her proxy female attack dog.

I don't know if Dean should (he has to play the ref in all this come August), but definitely Gore, Richardson (don't think Clinton wouldn't go there with a Latino), and Edwards should step in and shut it down. The best time would be about 2 weeks from the Penn. primary. They can space each of them out by a day or two, and take over the news cycle. Edwards first (he can stump to downscale voters), Richardson second (talk up foreign policy), and finally Gore (turning the page, the final nail in the coffin). Pelosi can feel free to jump in whenever.

Get there, guys!

Fiona Apple (Not in Love lyrics):

Conversation once colored by esteem
Became dialogue as a diagram of a play for blood
Took a vacation, my palate got clean
Now I can taste your ag