« Hillary Campaign "In The Red" | Home | MSNBC Reporter: Obama Campaign Didn't Push Story That Hillary Was Behind Passport Files Breach »

Video Of Richardson Endorsing Obama

Here's Bill Richardson's full endorsement speech from today...

Ben Smith notes this line from the speech:

It is time, however, for Democrats to stop fighting amongst ourselves and to prepare for the tough fight we will face against John McCain in the Fall.

That's basically an implicit call for Hillary to concede, and it will be interesting to see if more Obama supporters start saying it now that the Florida and Michigan revotes are effectively dead.


67 Comments

| Leave a comment

Regardless of the political implications, that was a great endorsement.

I guarantee that story of Obama helping him in the debate will get some national coverage.

I was in the crowd in Portland today, cheering my heart out for Richardson's endorsement of Obama. This is huge and I just hope that more party leaders and super-d's follow Gov. Richardson's lead.

If he'd had the goatee before he ran, I might have considered supporting him.

Though the time to support Richardson has passed, the time to support his Beard has come. His Beard has not only covered his face with hair, but has covered his person with wisdom, power, and love.

The Richardson endorsement speech and ceremony was funny and moving and rousing -- and the message could not have been more clear: please, HRC, recognize that the time has come for all of us to unite behind a once-in-a-generation presidential candidate and build our party and our country for the future. To that, many of us who admire Hillary Clinton and wish her a powerful role as a national Senate leader, can only say "amen."

Theda Skocpol, Cambridge, MA

user-pic

Anyone who has been conscious these past few days should understand that Obama suffers from an glaring defect, in the person of Jeremiah Wright.

The notion that we are going to "build our party" around a candidate who, in a completely unforced error, has made it so easy for him to be marginalized as having a soft heart for an America-hating, unpatriotic, radical left, is laughable.

Despite all the wind at the backs of Democrats in this election, I will not be surprised in the least if Obama loses in a landslide, given his exposure. Then, Democrats won't be "building", they will be recriminating.

Hillary suffers from a glaring defect in the person of Hillary Clinton. Anyone who has been conscious these past few days should understand that.

Stop the Drama; Vote Obama!

user-pic

I suppose Theda must have been unconscious for these last few days, then. I suppose she needs more lattes! (I'd hate for her to fall asleep behind her Prius, after all.)

Wow, we've got Theda Skocpol commenting! I've got to second a comment from another poster that the TPM comments section is one of the best developments of this campaign season.

user-pic

Wow, and welcome. I read many of your pieces during college and have the greatest respect for them.

As for the comment, I agree, 100%.

Nice little anecdote about the debate question. I think thatll go over well.

Indeed, here's another version of that story.

Did anyone see this nonsense? Bill Clinton's comments today on a Hillary/McCain matchup:

"I think it would be a great thing if we had an election year where you had two people who loved this country and were devoted to the interest of this country,""

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/21/794670.aspx

Cripes! It's almost as if he's trying to make sure his legacy is "Major League A-hole".

user-pic

That statement is OBVIOUSLY about Clinton running against Obama, not Clinton vs. McCain. Now we'll have to sit back and watch it ricochet around the blogs building up ever newer layers of pseudo outrage because people can't be bothered to read for themselves. Thanks. Thanks a lot.

Here's more from that same link. Seems the reporter is pretty clear Bill was referring to
McCain & Hillary. Let us know if they issue a retraction.

At a small VFW hall in Charlotte, NC, today, former president Bill Clinton contemplated a McCain/Clinton general election matchup, saying that it would one between "two people who loved this country" without "all this other stuff that always seems to intrude itself on our politics."

"I think it would be a great thing if we had an election year where you had two people who loved this country and were devoted to the interest of this country," said the former president. "And people could actually ask themselves who is right on these issues, instead of all this other stuff that always seems to intrude itself on our politics."

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/21/794670.aspx

user-pic

It's THE REPORTER who's coming up with what Bill Clinton means. Bill Clinton is wishing for an honest election without petty, meaningless crap. What Clinton is saying is, honestly, a bunch of hokey platitudes. Obama had a version of the same goddamn wish, that we could talk about gotcha statements, which is what the media wants to do, or put all the bullshit aside and actually talk about issues.

He doesn't say anything about McCain. He definitely doesn't hint that Obama isn't someone who loves his country. THE REPORTER leapt to a conclusion and put that in there. Reporters are stupid, sloppy, lazy, evil people, and they don't listen, and they like to stir up trouble because they're bored.

user-pic

I watched Bill's remarks and his next sentence was that's why he thinks Hillary is the best choice.

By suggesting he meant Hillary vs. Obama, why would his statement suggest she is the best choice? He was definitely talking about McCain and Hillary. Nice try though.

user-pic

He's being sarcastic, to call out THE MEDIA. I hear him saying, here's a thought: wouldn't it be nice if we had elections where the two candidates were speaking about their plans and their views, rather than being forced to deal with all kinds of ancillary ridiculousness? Nothing to do with McCain, nothing whatsoever. You wouldn't have even _thought_ it was more than a banal statement if the reporter hadn't said that he was looking forward to a McCain-Clinton matchup in the general election.

Obama said the same thing when he said that we _could_ play gotcha games and slug it out on the nightly news, or we could say "not this time." Clinton is doing his less-eloquent version of that. Don't find a way to twist it into a slur just so you can complain that there was a slur there. I know that's the DKos/TPM way, but, please, reality.

user-pic

From your same link. Proving, as usual, that reporters are loathsome.

Update: Bill Clinton spokesperson Matt McKenna clarifies the former president's comment: "Actually, as is indicated by the quote itself, President Clinton was talking about the need to talk about issues, rather than falsely questioning any candidate's patriotism.

He was lamenting that these kind of distractions 'always seems to intrude' on political campaigns. This consistent with his criticism of the 'politics of personal destruction,' which dates back 16 years."

user-pic

I can't believe that no one has noted the significance of the beard. Now that one bearded politician has endorsed Obama, the pressure on Gore to endorse must be enormous.

user-pic

Furthermore, Richardson's endorsement will increase Obama's support among bearded men (and women).

Very good point. Pennsylvania has a large migrant circus population, and the bearded woman vote is going to be crucial.

I wish I could have been there with you!

"A house divided against itself can not stand."

That was the quote that today was about for me. It was a throwback to Lincoln, and a call for the supers to get off their hands and end this. That's what we call a twofer.

love seeing these two on stage together. If Richardson were VP he would get the highly unpredictable Beard Vote.

idiotic's presence in this thread is sorely needed.

user-pic

If Richarson thinks that 14 million versus 14.2 million popular votes can be parlayed into convincing the American people that calling it for Obama at a point when he loses to McCain more surely than does Clinton is decent, let alone correct he has another think coming. This attitude simply inflames matters.

Perhaps if a seat on the Supreme Court were proffered for Bill,,, that would hasten things along,,,,,, or Hillary on the Court and Bill in the Senate ??

In any event, 'President Obama' sure sounds good !

GOBAMA 08

user-pic

Look, if you want to see a more realistic view on the popular vote issue, and Hillary's chances of winning it, you should start by looking at the chart at realclearpolitics. If you include the pre-existing FL result, Obama's lead is down to 408,000.

Going beyond the chart at realpolitics, and include the vote in MI, basing Obama's numbers on exit polls, you might well cut another 100,000 even from that number. (Which would also take away any amount that might be added if you were to include estimated caucus voters from IA, WA, ME, and NV).

Given that Obama has clearly passive-aggressively done what he could to prevent revotes in both FL and MI, and since there are millions of voters in MI and FL who most certainly would like not to disenfranchised, going with those electoral results, even with their flaws, is by far the fairest thing to do at this point.

So let's just say that Obama is now up roughly 400,000 votes in the popular tally. Can Hillary make up that difference?

Well, in Ohio, which is roughly the size of PA, though a bit smaller (~20% smaller), Hillary won by 10%, and ran up a 208,000 vote differential. If she could win by 20% in PA alone, she would be able to make up that difference.

And if, as one expects, the Wright controversy hurts Obama across the board in all remaining states, it's more than possible that Hillary will crank up even more of a win in the popular vote. Only NC is a reasonably large state after PA which might also favor Obama, and it might well be essentially tied, or even break in Hillary's favor, in the wake of the Wright scandal.

The problem for Obama is, of course, the Wright scandal. There's no reason to believe that it, or its effects, are going to go away, not even in the Democratic primaries.

And when one looks at the dreadful state-by-state polling of Obama's relative to McCain after the Wright scandal, you've got to know in your bones that the man is dead in the general.

The Wrighting is on the Wall.

this analysis is almost compelling enough to be posted at hillaryis44.org. almost.

if obama goes on to get the nomination and FL and MI are "frozen out" as they now appear to be, he won't be likely to carry those states in the general election. obama also seems likely to lose OH and PA to McCain in the general election. so unless he is going to re-write the electoral map of 2000 and 2004 he's a dead duck without FL, MI, OH, and PA. he needs at least 2 of the 4 to have any kind of chance... the point of all this is to say that the democrats have to find a way to count FL and MI in a way that the democratic voters who cast votes in January don't feel as though they have been frozen out of the process. Obama may well be able to stonewall on FL and MI, but only at the cost of handing those states to McCain in November.

user-pic

My guess is that if Obama gets the nomination, merely losing is going to be the least of his worries.

What he really needs to worry about is disgracing both himself and the Democratic Party in the general.

I give him very little chance to win PA, OH, MI, or FL, given the Wright scandal. Which would pretty much guarantee a loss. But I wouldn't be surprised to see him lose all kinds of other states where there are large numbers of Reagan Democrats.

In a year any Democrat should have an easy time to win, I could see how he might lose in a landslide.

And if people think there are going to be recriminations if Hillary is given the nod over Obama, just imagine what hell will break loose if Obama brings disgrace to himself and the Democratic Party in November.

"More than three out of four Florida Democrats say it’s “very important” that Florida’s delegates count toward the nomination, and one in four said they would be less likely to support the ultimate Democratic nominee if Florida’s delegates don’t count."

http://blogs.tampabay.com/buzz/2008/03/by-adam-c-smith.html

the Obama campaign is playing with fire in FL and MI.

mr. hocking:

i will certainly admit that i was wrong if obama wins in november. not only that, if obama gets the nomination i will support him whole-heartedly and vote for him in november.

i was never one of those who said that obama couldn't win and i have never attacked obama or anything that he stands for... i have never been the inverse of the obama supporters here at TPM who have cast aspersions on Hillary.

how about you mr. hocking? can you say the same?

user-pic

That was directed at frankly0 and not you. I was never under the impression that you were forecasting doom and gloom if Obama wins the nomination.

To answer your question anyway: I'm never afraid to admit I'm wrong, but then I rarely make such strong assertions as those made by frankly0 because I'm quite aware of how wrong I've been in the past. I'll never claim to understand the voting populace.

user-pic

I'm curious—will you be willing to admit you're wrong if Obama wins in November? After all, it seems there were a lot of Clinton supporters who were absolutely sure he wouldn't win the nomination. Were you one of them? (I know, it's technically not over yet.)

Your right argument is tired. Nobody makes a better rebuttal to your hookey better than Bill Richardson myself. But to respond to your rehashing of old FL/MI kicking and screaming, once again I pass on Markos Moulitsas's words on it:

"In Florida, it was the logistics, in Michigan it's apparently legislative roadblocks. Either way, Michigan and Florida will rightly pay the price for breaking the rules. At this point, I hope everyone agrees to seat their delegations, split 50/50 as to give no candidate an advantage for their sham contests.

While Howard Dean has gotten a lot of bile thrown his way for this, he has in fact shown great leadership.

To me, this was never about Obama or Clinton. It was about breaking the stranglehold that Iowa and New Hampshire have enjoyed at the top of the nominating calendar for far too long.

In short, if the DNC cannot enforce its rules and its calendar, then there's no way in hell we'll ever keep Iowa and New Hampshire in check. No matter what calendar the DNC created, Iowa and New Hampshire would move up their contests. And candidates, fearful that the states would ultimately be counted, would be forced to campaign in those states.

So the message had to be sent, no matter how unpopular, that the DNC calendar was sacrosant, and that its rules would be enforced. That message has now been sent.

Florida and Michigan played a valued role in this battle, proving they would risk their representation in order to demand a say in our nominee. It was a gamble that didn't pay off, obviously, and there's great irony in the fact that a later primary would've made them that much more influential this cycle.

But the original sentiment still applies -- they risked huge in order to demand a say, and that sentiment will guide big changes in our nominating calendar in the future.

There's wide acceptance that this system is broken, that the Iowa/New Hampshire monopoly can no longer stand, that the caucus system is profoundly lacking, that the delegate apportioning system leaves a lot to be desired, and (at least in the party's rank and file) that the super delegate system is less than ideal. Each one of the challenges we've faced this year in our path to the nomination has given us much-needed impetus for future reform.

So regardless the fact that Michigan's and Florida's contests will end up being non-determinative to the nomination, their sacrifices will ultimately help create a system that gives more Americans a voice in the process."

user-pic

Yeah, thanks for including Kos's remarks, because we can always expect perspicacious, dispassionate analysis out of the man, as well as a careful weighing of competing moral demands.

For the record, that would be sarcasm.

user-pic

amber,

Yo said it so well. Yes, I think Dean showed leadership upholding the rules and letting things run its course without budging while letting Clinton have her tantrum as well.

Any rational parent wishes to act consistently when the kids misbehave.

Here's more from that same link:

At a small VFW hall in Charlotte, NC, today, former president Bill Clinton contemplated a McCain/Clinton general election matchup, saying that it would one between "two people who loved this country" without "all this other stuff that always seems to intrude itself on our politics."

"I think it would be a great thing if we had an election year where you had two people who loved this country and were devoted to the interest of this country," said the former president. "And people could actually ask themselves who is right on these issues, instead of all this other stuff that always seems to intrude itself on our politics."
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/21/794670.aspx

user-pic

Same link, now updated.

Update: Bill Clinton spokesperson Matt McKenna clarifies the former president's comment: "Actually, as is indicated by the quote itself, President Clinton was talking about the need to talk about issues, rather than falsely questioning any candidate's patriotism.

He was lamenting that these kind of distractions 'always seems to intrude' on political campaigns. This consistent with his criticism of the 'politics of personal destruction,' which dates back 16 years."

That's not a clarification. That's just expanding on the second part of his quote. A clarification would be telling us who the "two people who loved this country" are. So if he meant Obama and Hillary instead of McCain and Hillary, he could have said that. And he didn't.

That's not a clarification. That's just expanding on the second part of his quote. A clarification would be telling us who the "two people who loved this country" are. So if he meant Obama and Hillary instead of McCain and Hillary, he could have said that. And he didn't.

user-pic

I heard it as Obama and Hillary, but now I'm not so sure about that. So I'll come down from that particular high horse.

But I _remain_ sure that it had diddly-squat to do with John McCain. B. Clinton is saying, JUST AS OBAMA DID in the speech about racial division, that it would be nice to have an election that revolved around issues and didn't degenerate into petty and ridiculous sniping about trivialities. The idea is that the two nominees would be evaluated on their plans and their merits and wouldn't be trying to undercut each other with sleaze. He's not praising McCain or suggesting darkly that Obama doesn't love his country. He's calling out the media. Whenever he does that, whenever anyone does that, some media figure will play dumb and create a controversy out of nothing. It's getting old.

What's getting older is the way people FALL FOR IT. Don't trust the media. They're a pack of slimy, venal snots.

The beard rocks. As a straight man, I'm hot for that beard.

The first time I saw him on TV after he dropped out he had that beard. I said to myself, "That's an f-you beard." Not a negative f-you, just a f-you, I'm getting a Harley and I'm gonna ride and I don't care what any y'all think.

And this was an f-you -- again, positive, not negative, quite respectful -- to the Clinton machine.

Don't go overboard on the beard thing.
Americans are still generally pogonophobic.
But otherwise...
Richardson was in great form and clearly enjoyed the moment.

Si se puede.

user-pic

Are you suggesting that a bearded person cannot win as VP? I'm sick and tired of these divisive comments from anti-Richardson trolls. I like the way you suggest that "Americans" are pogonophobic. LOL!!! Do you think that we can't see through your beard-baiting hypocrisy. You're a sick anti-beardite. I denounce and reject you.

A coalition once formed to resist kingly tyranny, and they were known as the Whig party. Let me be the first to officially join the Beard party. In fact, I am writing in "Bill Richardson's Beard" for president.

user-pic

I second. Al Gore's beard as VP.

dude, look at obama's site.
they doctored the beard out!
pro-beard my gotee

Bill Clinton:

"I think it would be a great thing if we had an election year where you had two people who loved this country and were devoted to the interest of this country."

Pish.

He will say anything and do anything to win her the nomination. It is as if he is possessed my an inner demon. And I suspect he is: G-U-I-L-T. And will he should be. He is a dog who sucked her dry...

Here is a prediction: She will divorce him in a year or so. After her defeat, there really is no real reason to pretend anymore. It is expediency, power, and the possibility of their "careers" that holds them together.

Once that is gone there is nothing left but mutual loathing and the money from their library racketeering. Is that enough to keep them hitched?

Probably not.


what would a day be like without some good ol' "clinton hate"? thanks, liberal historian!

my prediction: you'll be wrong (and you won't be around to apologize... heck, you won't even remember because you've probably already written more clinton hate than you can already remember!)

user-pic

Egad, the circulation of half-truths and incomplete citations only accelerates. Something is seriously wrong with people's bullshit detectors this year. That story was corrected, as was obvious would happen.

Update: Bill Clinton spokesperson Matt McKenna clarifies the former president's comment: "Actually, as is indicated by the quote itself, President Clinton was talking about the need to talk about issues, rather than falsely questioning any candidate's patriotism.

He was lamenting that these kind of distractions 'always seems to intrude' on political campaigns. This consistent with his criticism of the 'politics of personal destruction,' which dates back 16 years."

user-pic

Bill's my governor and that's the best speech I've heard him give. He does sound pretty relaxed and on his A-game.

Chuck Todd on today's David Gregory show: if Hillary wins both IN and NC, then she'll be the dem nominee (this assumes she wins PA also i guess)...

Todd also said that if Hillary loses IN then she's out of the race within a week...

Awesome!!!

user-pic

Why weren't Nancy Pelosi, Vernon Jordan, John Edwards, and Al Gore standing beside him?

The Clintons' self-indulgence at the expense of the nation and its future needs to end.

Bill Richardson. I had thought of him as a great potential President. Nice knife in the back BR. Great that your so off the pace with the people of his state. Gotta wonder what Obama "paid" for this one.

Seeing as the Clinton campaign was pretty much banking on him endorsing her as a "quid pro quo" for his Cabinet positions with Bill, I don't think you should be tossing bribery accusations around.

Trashing Pres. Clinton. Give it you Obamaistas you don't really have a stopping point. Kensdad is right on about the Electoral problems Sen. Obama has. With McCain in the race he is going to pull heavy in southern and mid Ohio which means Obama would have to win the Northeast 3:1. Not likely. Pa, he will get mauled in western so he needs a killer winning % in eastern. No way anyone here can pull together a electoral map that gives him a wim. I'd love to see it if you can put it together. How about it Obamaistas ....lets get past hope and show me reality.

user-pic

"Nice knife in the back BR."
Yeah, guess he forgot the blood-oath to the Clintons is for life.

"Great that your so off the pace with the people of his state."
Ignoring your sentence's misspelling and rather abrupt change in personage, Hillary won NM over Obama by less than 2,000 votes. It was so close it took more than a week to decide who won. Just how far off are you fantasizing he could possibly be?

"Gotta wonder what Obama "paid" for this one."
He promised Richardson he won't have to endure another Superbowl with Bill Clinton.

Thanks for getting personal. Is what I expect from a typical Obamaista. Nominate him. He will become this generations George McGovern.

user-pic

LOL! These guys are killing me! :)

user-pic

(Genghis and littleblackpropaganda, that is...)

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address