Top Hillary Donor Directly Pressures Dean: "Exercise Some Leadership" On Florida And Michigan
Top fundraisers for Hillary Clinton have begun to exert direct and personal pressure on DNC chair Howard Dean, urging him to show more leadership to bring about some sort of resolution to the Florida and Michigan vote standoffs.
In an interview with Election Central, venture capitalist Alan Patricof, a member of Hillary's finance committee and one of the Democratic Party's most influential fundraisers, said that he'd privately urged Dean to do more to get the Florida and Michigan delegations seated -- something that's crucial to the Hillary camp's hopes of closing the gap with Obama.
"I've expressed to Dean my feeling that it's critical that this matter be resolved on a timely basis," Patricof says. "The voters in Florida and Michgan cannot be disenfranchised."
"He's got to exercise some leadership, and the sooner, the better," Patricof continued. "This is a party issue. We cannot afford to alienate this large a voting population in two very important states."
That such an influential fundraiser is unhappy with the DNC could prove problematic, since the DNC of course relies on such figures to keep the money flowing in.
Indeed, other Hillary donors tell The New York Times that if Dean doesn't resolve the situation, the stream of money to the DNC will dry up.
Pushing to seat the Florida delegates, at least one top Clinton fund-raiser, Paul Cejas, a Miami businessman who has given the Democratic National Committee $63,500 since 2003, has demanded Democratic officials return his 2007 contribution of $28,500, which they have agreed to do.“If you’re not going to count my vote, I’m not going to give you my money,” said Mr. Cejas, who was the United States ambassador to Belgium from 1998 to 2001.
Christopher Korge, a Florida real estate developer who is another top fund-raiser for Mrs. Clinton, held an event last year in his home that brought in about $140,000 for the national party, which was set aside in a special account for the general election battle in Florida. But he told committee officials this week that if Florida’s delegate conundrum was not settled satisfactorily he would be asking for the money back.
“If we do not resolve this issue,” Mr. Korge said, “I think it’s safe to say there will be a request for a return of $140,000.”
In the interview with Election Central, Patricof seemed to suggest that more top donors would be insisting that Dean resolve the situation: "I'm sure there are other like-minded people who want this to happen," he said. "It's critical."

So basically they are threatening Dean to break the rules.
March 15, 2008 10:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
As an Obama supporter, I also think Dean should be doing more to resolve this situation. Clearly seating the delegates as is or not seating them at all are not acceptable. But we need to come up with a solution. The easiest way would be to give Obama what he wants in Michigan (a caucus), while giving Hillary what she wants in Florida (a new primary).
Dean is the only one who can put that deal together. Instead, he's stayed completely on the sidelines, refusing to get involved at all other than to give validation to dumb ideas like the mail-in-vote. So Obama supporters have just as much reason to be upset as Clinton supporters.
March 15, 2008 12:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
No basicallyt they are saying why should we as Florida DNC contributors contribute money to the DNC when they have disenfranchised my state. it's common sense - if my votes don't count then neither should my $$$.
March 15, 2008 2:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
"when they have disenfranchised my state."...
Rewriting History IS EXCELLENT NEWS!! FOR HILLARY!!!
March 15, 2008 3:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Posting relevant Hillary putdowns IS EXCELLENT NEWS!! FOR idiotic!!!
March 15, 2008 4:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
It isn't the DNC that has disenfranchised the FL and MI voters! It's the legislatures in each state that did so. The rules that the DNC established were clear and in both cases the legislatures decided to ignore them when setting the dates. Don't blame Dean or the DNC for this problem.
That being said, it does seem that something will need to be done, particularly in the case of FL, where it was the Republicans who made the decision on the date. (I'm sincerely hoping that FL voters will remember this, and throw the scoundrels out). I believe that Dean has solicited proposals for resolving the issue, but there hasn't been any that is acceptable. We can't have a process that re-creates the 2000 debacle, or favors Clinton over Obama. The votes that were cast were invalid - only those Dem voters who ignored the decision of the DNC voted. What about all those Fl Democrats who didn't vote because they knew the primary wouldn't count under the DNC rules. Should their wishes be ignored in the effort of Clinton to steamroll her way to the nomination?
What seems abundantly clear is that Clinton wishes to renege on the previous agreement that the FL vote shouldn't count. I think it was she who first called this "disenfranchisement" and laid the blame on the DNC. She apparently is encouraging her big donors to create a ruckus over the issue, because she sees that may be the only thing that could buy (and I use the term "buy" deliberately here) her the nomination. Over at CNN, Lou Dobbs has been railing lately about the "disenfranchisement caused by the DNC" too, never mentioning the legislative decisions that brought this sorry situation about. Once again, Clinton is pushing her own needs to the detriment of the party.
The influence of big donors is precisely what turns me off about the Clinton campaign, and is one of the primary reasons (although in no way the only one) I support Obama. I'm hoping Dean won't cave in the face of these strong-arm tactics. Find a solution, yes, but not at the expense of the DNC rules.
March 15, 2008 3:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm glad that you at least point out that it was a Republican legislature in Florida that set the date of that state's primaries -- what did they care that it didn't conform to the DNC rules? Too often on this board, I see people blaming Florida Democrats when they actually had little to say about it.
I heard a news clip this morning of Obama himself complaining that Florida "broke the rules" and didn't deserve to have its vote counted. I think that is unfair, and besides that, it's this moralistic inflexibility of his that is one of several reservations I have about him.
I'm not aware that the DNC instructed voters to stay home because the primary date did not meet party approval, so I don't see any basis for the statement that the only Democratic voters were those who "ignored the decision of the DNC." Had I been a Florida voter, I would most certainly not have stayed home, figuring a win for my candidate would at least have a positive effect on public perception (like a straw poll), even if the delegates were not counted. But it was widely speculated at the time the rules were set that the DNC would be forced to seat Florida and Michigan delegates anyway, since the eventual nominee would not want to risk alienating voters in two very critical states. Seems to me a smart voter would have gone to the polls on the chance that might prove to be the case.
I'm also not sure what "wishes" of those who did not vote in the primary you think would be ignored by seating the delegates in accordance with the way the vote was actually tallied on primary day. It may not be a perfect reflection of the sentiment of the larger electorate, but then neither are the tallies in a lot of other places, particularly in states that have caucuses. And I don't see how it is less fair than the 50-50 split of the delegation that some have proposed. Wouldn't an even split being ignoring the clear choice of those who actually did vote?
I'm not opposed to a re-vote in Florida, either, but that is looking like an increasingly unlikely scenario.
...
Find a solution, yes, but not at the expense of the DNC rules.
The DNC is not entirely blameless, here. They're the ones who set rules that, as I said previously, were widely thought to be unenforceable at the time, and so they are proving to be.
And as far as the rules being sacrosanct: funny that Obama supporters don't think the rule about superdelegates being independent should be equally sacrosanct.
I was annoyed last year with states continually leapfrogging each other to try to get in on the early voting, but it has become obvious to me now that telling them to be patient and everyone will get a turn is asking them to play the fool. There are a lot of Democrats who seem to want Dean and the superdelegates to step in at this point and make the votes of the remaining states moot because they feel the primary process is getting too messy. If the states at the end of the line are never going to be allowed to cast a vote that has any chance of deciding the contest, then why shouldn't they all be pushing and shoving to get to the head of the line?
March 15, 2008 5:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Dems in the Fla House overwhelmingly (all but one) voted to move up the primary. Can't blame the Republicans for this one.
March 15, 2008 5:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not only was the vote 118-0 in the Florida House and 37-2 in the Senate there, but several Democrats were quoted in the papers in gloating tones about how they were making Florida relevant again.
So - spare us the tears.
Apparently Hillary and those of you who are not thinking principles don't give a rat's behind how many people in the other 48 states feel disenfranchised because the rules are being thrown to the side. After years of teaching our kids that America ain't perfect but it works hard to be just and we need to stay involved to help in that end, you want us to prove ourselves wrong to our kids.
What freaking arrogance.
Here's something else - there's actually more registered Democrats than Republicans in Florida. So you're telling us that your Democratic party is too weak suck to get more Democrats voted in at the state level even though you have an edge in total voters?
March 17, 2008 1:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ok, raise your hand if you think HillCo. is destroying Dean too! They have been wanting to do this for a longtime now...They have always HATED the good doctor!
March 15, 2008 10:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's no secret that there's very little love lost between the DLC and Dean. Personally, I'd love it if Dean were in a position to tell the DLC to take a hike. If Hillary is elected, however, the DLC will be RUNNING this country. And that will NOT be a good thing.
March 15, 2008 12:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're absolutely right. Can you imagine if the Clinton clan would have gotten their way and forced James Carville in there like they were trying to?!!! The thought of it is chilling.
I'm incredibly disturbed that their essentially threatening the Democratic Party to wedge Hillary into office. If you can't win fair in square, hold a gun to the chairman's head and make him an offer he can't refuse.
Howard Dean is no fool and I'm sure has some contempt for the big money bullies. He is the protector of the party, and has enough integrity to do the right by not letting Hillary taint the democratic process as she is trying to do.
With George W. Bush in 2000, the world got to see the best election money could buy, and it would be an serious blow to let Hillary do the same in the race for a Democratic nominee.
For these big money fundraisers, I question their true motives and wonder if they have some financial gains or some other favors a la Dick Cheney in mind with a Clinton nomination. They obviously have little loyalty to the Democratic Party, if they did they would see that Barack Obama would help the party as a whole in Dean's 50 State Strategy by bringing out the voters as stories in the New York Times and Washington Post said this week.
Doctor Dean, don't be pressured by the Clinton Soprano tactics. I guess that ad that Bill and Hillary did just after the last episode of the Sopranos was more than just a spoof.
March 15, 2008 1:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary's position is painfully clear. She will torpedo anything and anyone that comes between her and the nomination. If she is afforded the opportunity to settle a personal score along the way, it's a bonus. The DNC, the Party, the Election are all fair game. I'm not sure she even thinks she'll win should she secure the nomination. At this point all I think she sees are her immediate obstacles. Well done! Clearly she passes the commander-in-chief test. It's exactly how Bush's Brain would handle (is handling?) the situation. It's DLC vs DNC for the soul of a Party. May we all rest in peace.
March 15, 2008 2:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
If the DLC wins, we'll be at war with Iran before you can say Joementum.
March 15, 2008 5:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hand Raised.
March 15, 2008 2:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, now we know the real puprose of that big meeting she had with her maxed out donors earlier this week.
March 15, 2008 10:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
If they think the money to the DNC is going to dry up by not resolving Michigan & Florida right now, just wait to see what happens if the nomination is stolen by one of the 2 candidates (see if you can guess which one I am referring to).
Alan Patricof is not seeing the forest for the trees. If the nomination is stolen then money to the DNC will not be the problem. Democrats fleeing the party by the millions is more likely. I call his empty threat and raise it by several million voters.
March 15, 2008 11:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
"venture capitalist Alan Patricof,"
Who the f--- is this guy and why the f--- should we listen to him??? Excuse my French, but this whole premise is absurd. Some corrupt backdoor moneyman is giving orders to the head of the party?
Talk about an unelected, unaccountable, corrupt oligarchy.
March 15, 2008 11:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
And "Christopher Korge, a Florida real estate developer." Now THAT'S someone whose opinion you want.
March 15, 2008 12:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Extortion racket! That will backfire. Won't sit well with the supers. Donna Brazile says the nominee of the party will be revealed within two weeks. This kind of stuff along with the Ferraro affair is pissing people off in the party.
March 15, 2008 11:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Can you give us context or a link for Brazile's statement? Thanks.
March 15, 2008 4:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't know Brazile's comment off hand; however I believe I can guess the context. In order to win the nomination without super delegate manipulation, Hillary needs to win all the remaining elections by margins of 99.7%. This achievement is virtually impossible. It will only be a matter of time before the democrats move to end this process. Hillary is just treading water anyway she can to stay afloat. This latest link to the voters on Hillary Supporters attempting to extort action out of Dean through arguments to withhold cash/donations will not play well.
If Hillary keeps up with the negative campaigning, Super Delegates will move quicker to end the process. Right now, I feel they are hoping that she will get the message.
In my opinion, the election will be over after North Carolina and Indiana.
March 15, 2008 4:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
So, unable to beat Obama in terms of votes or delegates, now the Clinton campaign is resorting to blackmail? Maybe that's an uncharitable interpretation of Korge's statement, but it certainly sounds that way to me. And it's not far off from Ferraro's "stop picking on me or I won't give you money" schtick earlier this week.
What's next? I'm half-expecting a National Lampoonesque "Nominate me or we'll kill your dog" kind of thing.
March 15, 2008 11:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ahhh, buying the nomination. Hillary's campaign is like a clown car of strategies. What buffoonish ploy will come out next?
March 15, 2008 11:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Clown car of strategies." Lol! I have no choice but to steal that. (Which is pretty much Hillary's campaign motto now, as it happens.)
March 15, 2008 12:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah dude, please. Take it and pass it on. Let's get it coined in the blogosphere.
March 15, 2008 12:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Mr. Cejas, if you really feel this way, you can take the next tire back to Cuba.
March 15, 2008 11:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Terry Mcauliffe can suck it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTWumj6qpmI
March 15, 2008 11:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary is just whinning louder and LOUDER. I am so sick of her whinning.
No do-overs!!!
Give the FL and MI half weight and no superdelegates AT ALL.
Let her keep them but give each one 0.5 weight.
End of story.
March 15, 2008 11:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Freetospeak hit the nail on the head - this fooked situation is giving the DLCers a chance to do a little 'political housecleaning' as they say in dictator-speak.
The line I'm thinking of is from the Big Lebowski: "No Walter, you're not wrong. You're just an asshole." Yes, the Clinton people are right... Dean should have shown a little more sack with this and solved this before it became the festering boil that it is now.
But that does not mean they don't have their own motives. Allowing cash to dry up at the DNC serves their purposes just fine, as they can use it to smear dean as an 'ineffective' steward of the organization. Which is just fucking crazy and insane, but SOP for these cretins.
March 15, 2008 11:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
I find it funny that the outrage is over Dean and not these individual states and their leaders for disenfranchising their citizens. Keep the eye on the ball people. The democratically elected leaders of both Florida and Michigan brought this on their own citizens.
March 15, 2008 11:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
screw 'em
their top heavy mode of fundraising isn't the only game in town anymore.
Obama could raise $63,000 in 20 minutes without the expense of throwing a party and without wasting hours appealing to fatcat vanity.
March 15, 2008 11:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Can you legally get your money back after you donate it? I mean finders keepers.
And I love that they are so concerned with disenfranchisement when they got the majority of the vote, yet they have no problem essentially stuffing the ballot box with 10,000+ votes at a pop for every superdelegate they try to use to hijack the popular will. Yeah, Hillary just loves democracy:
http://www.thepersonalispolitical.com/2008/03/case-study-hillarys-doublespeak-and-her.html
March 15, 2008 11:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Why on earth is this story lacking the information about Terry McAullife's direct involvement in organizing and directing these donors? It is outrageous that HRC's campaign is coordinating these donors' bullying of the DNC. For crying out loud - can't they at least PRETEND to support the party anymore?
March 15, 2008 11:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good old fashioned blackmail.
March 15, 2008 11:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
I sure see it as a threat.
Their motives could be believable only if they had said these things, and threatened to pull their financial support way back when:
All the candidates, including Hillary, signed the agreement to not count the votes/delegates fo Florida (and Michigan.)
It is too late now. Because the disenfranchising ocurred then, not now.
If Obama had pulled Florida (and Michigan) in his favor, would these Hillary supporters be pushing this?
Anyone can seriously answer "yes" to that question?
March 15, 2008 11:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
All Dean and the DNC have to do is ignore Hillary's blackmail and turn to Obama's 1 million plus grassroots donors. Dean has been working at the grassroots for several years; Obama took the idea and ran with it.
Hillary is not only bottom feeding, she's living in the distant past. Dean has no reason to pay attention, either to her or to her high-priced donors.
March 15, 2008 11:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
I thought Clinton was the voice of the people? You know, those sub 50k people who don't drink latte? Oh yeah, I'm sorry, this must be one of THOSE sub 50k venture capitalists...
March 15, 2008 11:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, whether you like it or not, lobbyists are Americans, too.
March 15, 2008 11:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
If you believe in Dean and believe in the 50-state strategy that Clinton and her minions are so allergic too, then show Dean some love:
http://www.dnc.org/splashcrowd.php
If it weren't for Dean (and the online grass roots' support for a 50 states strategy), we wouldn't have taken 2006 as big as we did and Barack Obama's campaign would be a shell of what it is today. After all, he IS following the Dean strategy.
http://www.dnc.org/splashcrowd.php
I made my donation. How about you?
March 15, 2008 11:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Great idea.
How dare Hillary and her donors try to muscle the democratic party.
I gave $100.00 to the DNC as long as Dean remains as head.
I too,know how to attach strings.
Hopefully, others will match my donation and tell their friends.
Give any amount you chose from $5.00 on up.
We need to show the Clintons that the DNC and American public does not need them or their donors.
March 15, 2008 11:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
Very cool. I have a feeling the DNC is going to come to work Monday morning and the online donation totals from over the weekend will shock them.
;-)
March 15, 2008 12:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why is this cool? FL is a corrupt state whose opinions don't really resonate with the rest of America. (Except those perhaps of TX.)
These a-holes were warned way in advance that if they moved their primary up the delegates wouldn't be seated. They made their bed, now they'll have to lie in it. Payback for '2000 and -2004. Ohio and Florida are backwards to say the least.
March 15, 2008 3:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
I made a donation for $100 to the DNC & then gave another $100 to Obama.
March 15, 2008 12:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Very cool of you too (x 2)
;-)
March 15, 2008 12:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Isn't this extortion, guys?
March 15, 2008 11:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
From the Desk of:
Howling Wolfman
Senator Clinton wishes it to be known that some of her biggest financial backers have donated a lot of funding to the Democratic National Committee, and they wish to have the favor returned by Howard Dean.
They have made it very clear to Mr. Dean that he should consider those donations as actually bribes, and if he will not fix the Florida and Michigan Primary outcomes in Hillary's favor, then those big donors will demand that Howard Dean return their Bribes, I mean donations.
Hillary Clinton approves of this message, and also approves of John McCain as Commander in Chief, ahead of Senator Obama.
March 15, 2008 11:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
making Howard mad!! will be EXCELLENT NEWS!! FOR HILLARY!!!
March 15, 2008 11:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
"If my vote doesn't count I want my $28,000 back?!" Why should his vote count more than anyone else's?
This illustrates perfectly why a stake must be driven through the heart of the Clinton-Big Money wing of the Democratic Party. These mega-donors are trying to throw their weight around in internal party matters the same way they do with legislation that threatens their interests. Obama has shown what can be done with a people-powered small donor fundraising model. Clinton, OTOH, relies on the Terry McAuliffe-suck up to the big donor model. As long as the Clinton model is allowed to persist, corporate Democrats will only be slightly bluer versions of their Republican counterparts. I can't wait until Obama's people are running the DNC and these fat cat Democrats have one vote that counts the same as everyone else's.
March 15, 2008 11:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
For the remaining honest Clinton supporters- THIS is what you're supporting. Aren't you proud?
March 15, 2008 11:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Once again, it's Hillary first, Democratic Party last!
March 15, 2008 11:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
It WILL be her!
March 15, 2008 11:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Overturning the will of the people is fair. An election with only one name on the ballot is fair. Blackmailing the DNC to win an election is fair. Seems like a reasonable stance to me.
March 15, 2008 11:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Talk about empty threats! Just have Obama ask his 1-million-plus donors to chip in ten bucks each. That should take care of the problem.
March 15, 2008 11:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Now you know who would actually be calling the shots in a Hillary Rodham Clinton administration.
March 15, 2008 11:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
THOUGHT EXPERIMENT:
Howard says "Screw you!" and calls their bluff.
What happens then?
My guess? Big $$ DLC types lose their power. We finish crashing the gate.
so...
THIS IS EXCELLENT NEWS!! FOR HOWARD!!!
March 15, 2008 11:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
I hope Dean is smart enough to realize a few things. As the General election rolls around, Patricof and the others will still be sending their money to the DNC; this is an empty threat. If the Dems lose this election, they are likely to lose the SCOTUS for a long time to come (Stevens is 88, Ginzberg 75). If McCain wins where do they suppose Lieberman's votes will go? No matter who wins the nomination, there will be hurt feelings and disaffection on the other side. Big time donors know it's not about sentiment, but about influence. They will fight like hell (with their money) to make sure the Dems can keep their majorities. I hope they keep in mind it's never to late for the Republicans to attain a big swing again a dispirited opponent and regain their majorities. Finally, almost everyone agrees the delegations will eventually be seated in some fashion (I still believe the 50/50 option is the eventual choice of the Credentials Committee, you heard it here first). If re-vote attempts fall flat this next week, then it doesn't seem there will be time for any other alternatives. The half-votes scenario for FL will only fly if it applies to the supers as well.
March 15, 2008 12:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Looks like time to throw a little extra green to Obama. Show these bitches how real fundraising is done.
March 15, 2008 12:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
There has to be sort mechanism devised for a re-vote ASAP.
March 15, 2008 12:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
No there doesn't. We do not need a re-vote.
That is changing the rules in the middle of the game.
NO RE-VOTE.
There should be a ruling on how the delegates will be seated and what their value will be. The popular vote from those states does not count because they violated the rules. That would be fair as many did not vote because they were told it did not count. NO super delegates from those states should be seated whatsoever.
The superdelegates are primarily responsible for the voters being disenfranchised in FL and MI. Even though FL was headed by GOP in state the democrats did NOT vote against it.
They must be punished for violating the rules. To change the rules to accomodate the rule violators is WRONG.
No DO- OVERS!!!!!!!!!!!1
March 15, 2008 12:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Major Clinton Fund-Raisers are threatening to withhold donations to the DNC unless the Florida delegates are seated with the January results or there is a new primary. the January primary was in violation of national party rules and a new primary would not Florida pass state law.
To show the DNC that Obama supporters are inclusive of all Democrats and are committed to a fair and just resolution of this process, I am asking that people make a Money Bomb donation to the DNC adding $.46 to represent Obama's age. We are not threatening the DNC by withholding funds but ask that the resolution be fair and by the rules of the party, which Obama has stated all along..
Show your support by donating $5.46, $10.46, $25.46, $50.46 to the DNC as a Money Bomb showing a commitment to a fair and inclusive process to the seating of the Michigan and Florida delegates.
https://www.democrats.org/page/contribute?outreach_page_id=2037
March 15, 2008 12:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Great idea
'
I sent Obama $25.46
I like the moneybomb idea.
I want Obama to know that we support his not accepting these trickydickydelegatedoover moves from the Clinton camp.
Obama is inherently fairminded and I am certain he was to do something for to ABIDE by the rules but that does not mean he has to allow Hillary to claim that the votes in FL and MI count.
NOPE...STAND UP for us Obama. By standing up for the rule you are not disenfranchising voters but abiding by the rules that were set out to begin with.
March 15, 2008 1:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gee, imagine that!
HRC's supporters pressuring Dean to get actively involved in resolving the FL and MI difficulties! How dare they!
And of course we all know that Obama's supporters haven't been pressuring Dean and the DNC at all now have they?
Oh wait, what about those threats to destroy the party if Obama doesn't win the nomination?
I still can't figure out if most of the posters here suffer from a mental disease or if they just prefer living their life in a long continuous delusional state.
March 15, 2008 12:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's the manner in which their pressuring that bothers me, JTHB. They have every right to try to persuade Dean to do what they want, but I'd have more respect if it were by making arguments rather than throwing their financial weight around. Though in light of recent developments in fundraising, that weight ain't what it used to be. These sums and the power they seem to believe accompanies them is almost cute and endearing in its near-obsolescence. I picture pasty, old men, a little thick around the middle and wearing very nice suits, stamping their feet and sputtering 'screw you guys, i'm going home.'
March 15, 2008 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Which is exactly why I can't believe the story and even if it is a small bit true it is so laughable, because of the $$$ amounts involved, as to beggar belief that anyone takes it seriously.
The supposed blackmailers are not stupid and know full well that the ObaFans can out donate them tenfold if need be. And by the way it is suggested that the HRC supporters want an answer in her favor only, an assumption for which no evidence is provided, true?
As to the moral acceptability of the reported threat well I think it preferable to threats one hears from the ObaCamp to riot in Denver a la Chicago 68.
I think that a resolution to the FL and MI questions needs a kick start from Dean and the DNC. I also understand the party biggies using everything at their disposal to try and force a solution.
What happens in FL and MI will have ramifications from city level all the way up to Denver and the Presidency and for years to come.
It transcends Obama v. HRC.
March 15, 2008 12:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
so evidently you are charging the NYT and TPM EC of reprehensible journalism, rather than accepting the idea that Hillary and her supporters are doing something reprehensible to help her campaign.
pretty serious accusations, maybe you could e-mail the NYT editor on that story and TPM expressing your disbelief and post the responses.
March 15, 2008 3:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Talk about short-sighted. ANYONE willing to sacrifice the Party as a whole in order to seat their candidate in the one election is simply wrong.
March 15, 2008 12:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dean has already resolved it. He told Florida and Michigan that if they moved their primaries up, their delegates wouldn't be seated. They moved their primaries up. Their delegates shouldn't be seated. It's really frikkin' simple, isn't it?
They should probably do what the Republicans are doing and seat half the delegates. Either that, or give Hillary ONE more delegate from each state and seat them all.
Is anyone besides me getting sick of seeing Hillary try to smear and cheat her way to the White House?
March 15, 2008 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Per Dailykos,
If you support Dean, make a donation and be sure and add $.01 to your donation so they know where it's coming from.
March 15, 2008 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
As Mark Shields observed on Newshour last evening,,,,,,, if the DNC does not stick to the decision that was taken,,,,, it will be utter madness next time with primaries starting in August. At best, split the delegates 50 / 50 between the two campaigns, and seat them and tell them never again,,,,,, or seat them, and not let them vote in the nomination process come convention time.
Bad behaviour is never to be rewarded, Period.
March 15, 2008 12:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Looks like this dog ain't hunting, either!
Dean is not running from the Clinton and surrogates. Geraldine, YUGO GIRL!
Next election cycle or two everything goes team Clinton way! Sounds like Putin will run their campaign. Good dogs are hard to find!
March 15, 2008 12:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dean's not going to let them buy the nomination for Hillary for a few hundred thousand dollars.
Of course, this whole things also shows what kind of Democrats the Clintons and their supporters are.
March 15, 2008 12:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why didn't these fundraisers speak out BEFORE the primaries took place? Why didn't they object when the DNC made the rules (with the full approval of Clinton-backers)?
This is the part that absolutely stinks about this, and about Clinton's criticism of caucuses. If you didn't like any of this, you had plenty of time to make your objections known. But to turn around after-the-fact, when your candidate is losing so you're trying anything to snare an advantage, is completely unethical. This is EXACTLY how Republicans campaign. Aren't we better than that?
March 15, 2008 12:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Patricof should shut the f&@# off and leave DNC alone. Dems can do without him.
March 15, 2008 12:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
“If we do not resolve this issue,” Mr. Korge said, “I think it’s safe to say there will be a request for a return of $140,000.” To fund Hillary's third party race.
March 15, 2008 12:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
The blatant nature of this blackmail will only make Hillary look even more desperate than she looks now.
She had all the qualifications, the name recognition, and the money---and ran the worst campaign since Dukakis. Now she seems quite willing to destroy the party in order to get the nomination.
There is no way she should be the nominee by any fair standard.
March 15, 2008 12:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree with everyone above re: this is old-style back-room extortion. Howard won't cave, he knows a million-plus grassroots donors have his back. We don't need you, Ms. Ferraro and Mr. Fat Cat Florida Developer!
March 15, 2008 1:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is there any species lower than "Florida real estate developer?" Why do these people have a direct line to Greg?
March 15, 2008 2:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Top Hillary Donor Directly Pressures Dean: "Exercise Some Leadership" On Florida And Michigan
By Greg Sargent - March 15, 2008, 10:31AM
Now they want Dean to "exercise some leadership" over Florida and Michigan. Where were those clowns when Dean needed their support when Florida and Michigan went ahead, against the wishes of the DNC, and violated the rules that both States had signed on to. Those Hillary Fat Cats sure were strangely silent then, weren't they, because they thought they were pulling a fast one on behalf of Hillary. Now that they are the ones that have gotten Hillary's you know what caught in their wringer, they have started howling for Dean to come and rescue her.
He warned them not to do it. but they went ahead anyway. You did your job Howard. Let them endure the consequences of their arrogant and willful flaunting of the rules that had been agreed to by all.
March 15, 2008 1:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
I second jhv.
there's something fundamentally wrong when benevolent donors become blackmailers.
March 15, 2008 1:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Clinton campaign has an amazing Spears like ability to redefine the meaning of hitting the bottom. Everytime you think they can't fall any lower...
March 15, 2008 1:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
you make good points, but, come on. Do you truly believe this is not a tactic that came out of the donor meeting this weekend? Isn't that a little naive? The Clintons are great tacticians. They'd say so themselves. If they're going to wrest this nomination from obama, it will be with many many many more of these kind of tactics. This one is to seed the press with FL and MI stories, keeping the uncertainty going, because a re-vote of FL and MI will provide her no net gain in either delegates and no popular vote lead.
March 15, 2008 1:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeszzz, those bad bad bad states broke the rules and must be punished!
Even at the coast of alienating a huge swath of voters needed for victory in the Fall, well so what, let's all cut off our noses in solidarity shall we?
Please remember why this we find ourselves in Land o' FUBAR.
The issue of breaking a few itty bitty states' stranglehold on the primary/caucus schedule started this, has not been resolved, and will not go away just because Dean and the DNC need to punish FL and MI.
Behind the scenes this is the larger issue and FL and MI largely get the sturm und drang they do because many many states are intent on breaking Iowa and New Hampshire's grip. Thus the support (or not) for seating their delegations, despite the rules, comes from more than just the candidates and their fans.
The State parties are the real players here.
If only it were just about the "elected" delegates for Denver!
March 15, 2008 1:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Pardon me for saying this, but don't you frequently shrug off the danger of a much larger swath of voters (that the Democrats need much more badly in the coming election) being alienated by a backroom Clinton victory?
I don't think the DNC is happy about having to make an example of anyone, least of all two sizeable swing states, but having made the decision, it's important to stick with it.
If the Democrats seat either delegation as-is, the Republicans will be on their case quicker than you can say "weak-kneed liberal flip-flopper".
I'm hopeful that Michigan at least will end up being done properly. I'm not as sanguine about Florida, but we'll see.
March 15, 2008 6:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, it's critical to their attempt to seat the delegates "won" in a non-election as part of their overall strategy, having lost the elections decided by the votes of the people.
If these f**kwads get the supers to roll for them or manage to seat the Michigan and Florida delegations, Hillbillary will be crushed in the general and she will richly deserve her fate.
March 15, 2008 2:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Clinton will be the nominee and will win the Presidency.
Get over it.
It is time for the blogs to start demanding the resignation of w.
Enough with his failed leadership.
March 15, 2008 2:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Bush Administration, as most brightly demonstrated during Hurricane Katrina, has depended on the repetition of falsehoods to hope that somehow they might come true or that the public will buy them. "Act as If" it is sometimes called in the realm of positive thinking. But applied to Bush it is known as being "detached from reality" or "living in a bubble."
You're clearly into saying the same thing over and over again in your responses to Reader Posts, but you are either a.) really, really bad at math, b.) detached from reality, c.) blindly and hopefully in love with the Clintons, d.) Mark Penn, or e.) all of the above.
I wish you the best and hope you'll stay with the Democratic Party when Hillary loses and help support many of the Democrats running for congressional seats in Red States that will be boosted up by Barack Obama when he is the nominee.
Putting lipstick on a pig isn't going to help the Democrats extend their congressional lead and win the oval office. I don't expect you to change your view, but dear god, please stop writing the same thing over and over and over... But being that your so in love with the Clintons you probably like the same old thing, or as Stephen Colbert put it "a piece of pizza that's been sitting under a heating lamp for 30 years."
March 15, 2008 3:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
When did is Scalia's right hand become bigger than his face? Does this happen to all right-wingers?
March 15, 2008 3:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Surely you jest, Sir.
You are either joking, or you're a supporter of Mr. McCain.
March 16, 2008 6:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think I've devised a solution that will satisfy all parties.
The Clintons love to cheat, so someone should be cheated.
Obama has said he will abide by whatever is decided. His compliant position should be appropriately rewarded.
Those establishment democrats who are not looking forward to losing power in the event that Hillary loses the nomination should have their tenacity rewarded.
The solution: seat FL and MI delegates and pledge all of them in support of Obama.
I'm sure Clinton supporters see the added bonus this would include for Hillary, but I'll mention it anyway. By accepting this solution, she would pass the "I'm not really the Hillary you've come to know in this campaign — I was just kidding!" and by so doing, would preserve what little remains of her and her husband's reputations as Democrats.
March 15, 2008 2:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
But you good folks keep it up- you make more enemies for the Clintons every time you open your mouths.
March 15, 2008 2:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's what Dean should do: Call the DLC's bluff.
"Ok, you want to play it that way? Fine. If you follow through with the threat to cut off funding, I will make it the job of the DNC to both oppose Hillary's candidacy, and discredit the DLC. Will I succeed? Neither of us knows, but it's a fair bet that there would be acres of scorched earth, and a discredited Hillary (and possibly Obama) at the end of it. Oh, and I'll take every opportunity to say, 'Hillary Clinton destroyed the Democratic party's chances in 2008. This is all her fault.'
Do you really want to have that war?"
March 15, 2008 2:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Looks like the DLC (Democratic Leadership Council) Democrats want to take control over the DNC. I personally think the your DNC chair is doing his job by staying impartial and following the rules & bylaws set down by his party.
http://www.dlc.org/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Leadership_Council
wiki should be viewed with a cautious eye due to the very nature of its posting rules.. I urge you to do your own research if interested.
March 15, 2008 2:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Correct me if I'm wrong but Hillary got her biggest money donors together yesterday and sent them out to blackmail Dean into changing the rules regarding MI and FL in her favor or they won't support the nominee in November?
I say it's time to send Dr. Dean and the DNC as much as we can in as many small donations as we can to show these traitors what we think of their tactics. They're gonna take their ball and go home if they don't get their way? Well they can kiss their ambassadorships and state dinners goodbye.
Let's show these scorched earthers that the Democratic party doesn't belong to Bill and Hillary's fatcats anymore.
https://www.democrats.org/page/contribute/splashCrowds
March 15, 2008 2:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Agree. Actually, it was only because Dean became chairman of the DNC and set up the 50-state strategy to build the party that I have been donating to the DNC these past few years.
Now is the time for we grateful grassroots folks to increase our donations to the DNC.
March 15, 2008 3:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thirded. I'm donating today...
March 15, 2008 4:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yikes! So now Hillary donors are resorting to blackmail to force the DNC to allow Hillary to cheat. She must have pitched this idea to them at her Thursday fundraiser. Yecch.
March 15, 2008 2:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lord, I have been just trying to survive through 8 years of this reality-bending wordplay-instead-of-leadership crap. I wish HRC and her troupe of bad actors would just shut up.
What is REALLY happening is that they are staring down the muzzle of a scenario where Florida DOESN'T re-run the primary, and Michigan does, which is the worst of all possible outcomes for them.
You can't take the existing results because A) the rules were stated clearly and both states knew the game they were playing when they broke them ... if Dean let's that go unchallenged, he effectively abdicates authority of the DNC, and B) Obama WASN'T ON THE MICHIGAN BALLOT, so that was not a representative contest.
So it is idiotic on the surface of it all, yet these boneheads continue to aggressively pursue this Pyrrhic campaign that is ... unbelievably after 8 years of the f**king Monkey in Chief ... going to end up with Grandpa McCain in the White House. Thanks. Thanks a lot.
I don't get the impression that Howard Dean is an easy guy to push around. I guess that's what I have to bank on for now.
March 15, 2008 3:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
vanidem: All good points.
Bill Schneider on CNN also has been pointing out that in FL and MI, as opposed to almost every other state that has held a primary, the Republican turnout was much higher than the Democratic turnout, indicating that there were lots of Democrats who simply didn't vote, as they knew their primaries were invalid. To now count the FL and MI votes would be completely unfair to those who followed the DNC rules and didn't vote.
Hillary's claim of a "win" in FL is all smoke and mirrors (as are so many of her other claims).
March 15, 2008 4:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
I sent the DNC $75.01. It's not venture capital, but it's a start.
Downticket races shouldn't be held hostage to this nonsense. Dean is just enforcing the rules, and staying out of the fray while the states solve the problems they created.
There's more to this party than the POTUS race. Whichever presidential candidate you support, show the DNC some love, so they know that small donors appreciate fair dealing.
March 15, 2008 3:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Your state disenfranchised itself, initially by voting Jeb Bush into office, and then Katherine Harris. Your politicians are in the pockets of the hyper capitalistic Cubans and the pro-Israeli war mongers. Plus, Florida is one big shopping mall and superhighway disaster. Join Texas and become your own country!
March 15, 2008 3:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's where the rubber meets the road in terms of the small donor revolution in Demo party politics. If big money donors like Patricoff can intimidate Dean into handing the nom to Clinton, nothing has changed. If Dean is confident he can raise as much or more from an energized, engaged small donor base, then win or lose the nom, the Clinton era of massive corporate donations as the heart of the party is over.
Dean should push hard for small donor online donations now to show his strength and quiet those who say he is letting his respect for the rules interfere with the party's chances in Nov.
March 15, 2008 3:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
I truley wish those of you that are card carrying dems the best of luck in November. This post is NOT meant as a reflection on your Presidential candidates or your inter party tactics.
Lets look forward to the General election. For those of us who are not card carrying Democratic party member (Indies,newbies & crossover voters).
If you are inclined to thwart the continued Bush/Cheney policies in 2009 what do you do? I would urge you to vote FOR your States Dem nominees for Senate & Congressional seats in this primary. Whether or not the Dems can unify their party before the General is up to them alone. I'd rather not speculate on that in this posting.
1 In the General vote FOR your states entire Dem Senate and Congressional seats.
2 Decide to vote AGAINST the Dem nominee by leaving the Presidential slot BLANK in Nov 08
3 Vote with your feet by not showing up to vote in Nov 08
4 Vote for the Dem Presidential nominee just because thats the only choice you have been given.
5 Most importantly vote FOR the Presidential candidate because this candidate is YOUR choice.
I am NOT a follow my party right or wrong voter..I'm not even a member. However I do wish to thwart any more of the Bush/Cheney policies of the present. Therefore I will vote FOR my states Dem Senate & Congressional seats that are in play during this election. It will be interesting to see how many Indies and newbie & crossover voters feel the same way.
On to this Convention...
The Dems will have August 25-28 their convention thru Nov 4th 2008 to try to heal their party... I'm not optomistic about their chances to do that.
I am not a member of any organized party--I am a Democrat. Author: Will Rogers
March 15, 2008 4:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
I continually keep thinking to how Hillary would respond if Obama was the won behind in delegates and wanting Florida and Michigan seated. I bet she'd swat that notion right down, and rather smarmily, too.
I mean, never underestimate a Clinton, but I don't see how she's going to win. By the time of the convention she will have a narrowing superdelegate gap, be inevitably trailing in pledged delegates, and most likely, behind in the popular vote as well. Pelosi has said the nomination is determined by the number of delegates. I know Pelosi isn't Moses on the mount here, but I think it's a fairly good indication of where these primaries are headed.
Granted, despite how much I'd resent her if she wins, I'd probably still vote for her, simply because she'd be the lesser of two evils. But seeing as how it seems increasingly unlikely she's going to win, I'm surprised she just doesn't call it quits at this point. You can bet Obama would have had he been in her position.
March 15, 2008 4:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is a pretty amazing turn of events that has caused the blame to be put on Dean and the DNC. Here's a thought - when your state's primary has been stripped of all of its delegates, don't hold the damn thing anyway, waste millions of dollars, and then demand someone else pay for a do-over.
March 15, 2008 4:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Left unsaid in the above story is the fact that at least one donor has asked for (and received) a refund of his donation to the party, and others are threatening to do the same.
They're pushing for the party to seat the delegates as is or . . . nothing. They refuse to negotiate a revote because they're trying to ram the Jan 29 vote down the party's throat.
So the best way to show Dean you support is through money. Let Clinton's supporters take their 150K and stick it.
Over at Kos, nj mom has a full run down of the Clinton backroom tactics, plus a link to donate $, and they're adding another .01 to each donation so Howard knows where the love is coming from.
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/3/15/8222/89130/817/477167
The a position is seat the delegates as is, wethe donorzs
March 15, 2008 4:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Based on the plain facts quoted here and linked below, I wonder what these donors' real object is:
"What would happen if an agreement were announced today that there would be re-votes in Florida and Michigan? Immediately, the previous primaries in those states would become dead letters. Instead of being 200,000 votes down in the popular vote (by her campaign's count), or 500,000 down (by my count, which gives Clinton her Florida votes), Clinton would be down in the popular vote by almost 1 million. And 193 delegates that they are currently counting would suddenly disappear.
"And at that point, the magnitude of Clinton's deficit would be too obvious to spin away. Yes, there would be two additional large-state contests in which to win back the million popular votes and hundreds of delegates. But unless she did significantly better in both states than she did in the illegal primaries, she would lose, not gain, ground, by her own calculations. Since she was on the ballot alone in Michigan before, it's highly unlikely that she will do better there. It's very possible that she could do better than the 50 percent she won in Florida in January, but since it would now be a two-person race, it's a dead certainty that Obama would do significantly better than the 32 percent he got in January, thus adding to his total popular vote margin and delegate count even if he lost again, and so it would be a net loss for Clinton. Re-votes cannot help Clinton be "perceived" as the winner of the popular vote."
http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/tapped_archive?month=03&year=2008&base_name=why_clinton_doesnt_want_a_revo
March 15, 2008 4:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why didn't Hillary take her name off of the Michigan ballot, as Biden, Richardson Edwards and Obama did?
Could it be that Hillary wanted to put Michigan in her "win" column? With only Dodd and Kucinich, (who unsuccessfully tried to remove his name from the ballot) to run against, she would obtain an easy victory and a "bump" for doing so.
The Governor of Michigan, as well as other prominent members of the Michigan super delegation to the convention pushed for the early voting. All of the following, would eventually endorse, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Michigan superdelegates who already have committed to Clinton: Gov. Jennifer Granholm, Lt. Gov. John Cherry, Democratic National Committee member Joel Ferguson, U.S. Sen. Debbie Stabenow and U.S. Rep. Sander Levin. Rep. John Dingell and his wife, Debbie have also endorsed Clinton. It was Debbie, who was the driving force behind Michigan moving up it's primary.
March 15, 2008 4:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
The DNC needs to hold a fundraiser or do something to come up with the money to hold new primaries if they aren't going to accept the prior Fla. primary.
The DNC had no right to strip Fla. of their delegates just because they moved up their primary. Maybe Fla. and Mi. shouldn't have done that but DNC's action was worse. What/who do they think we are here in U.S. - a dictatorship? This is DNC's fault, so they need to be more active in resolving it! Damit!@
They will not get another dime from me until/unless they do something. Florida and Michigan need full and fair primaries now.
Rae
March 15, 2008 4:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
No right? No right? I have yet to see a comment from you that shows you've got the sense God gave possum, but this one takes the cake.
The rules constituting the convention, rules voted upon and accepted by Florida's own party officals months before the electionspecified that the Iowa, NH, NV and SC would be the only states allowed to have primaries before Super Tuesday and that any state that broke that rule would not be awarded of any delegates.
Got that?
a) No one "stripped" Florida and Michigan of delegates. The rules stated that the national party was not permitted to award them delegates. They had no legal right to award delegates on the basis of elections held out of the zone.
b)Everyone from Howard Dean, to the candidates, to Congressional leaders to, for all I know, the DNC member's momma, begged the Florida and Michigan legislatures not to do this. They warned them over and over and over again. Florida and Michigan both flipped the party off and did what they pleased because they thought they were too big and important to suffer any consequences.
Typical Hillaroid logic. This is what we want now, the rules we agreed to in the past are irrelevant because they don't give us what we want now and you have no right to deny us what we want now because its what we want and we want it now.
Christ, you guys are worse about inventing parallel universes where the facts are what you want them to be than Bush.
March 15, 2008 5:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
The headline should read "Clinton Fundraisers Pressure Dean to Seat Florida Delegates As Is."
Coincidence that at the same time they're pressuring Dean to capitulate, Florida's Clinton supporters in congress are refusing to consider a re-vote? Methinks not.
At the same time, Hillary finally states publicly that her minions in Fla won't let the revote happen, or won't let the re-vote happen unless the circumstances are more favorable to her, or negotiate something more than the 50/50 solution.
Obama says little, because he's not into lying to the public.
Yet another example, as if we needed one, of the distinctions between the top-down dark backroom big contributors campaign and the bottom up sunlight fairness campaign.
March 15, 2008 4:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think the most telling aspect of the story was how the DNC responded to the threats. When the guy demanded his money unless they did x, the DNC responded by giving back the guys donation. That is just plain awesome. I'm glad Howard Dean and the DNC have a backbone and told this supporter through actions to buzz off.
Take heed Hillary supporters that attempt to buy the campaign through donations, the DNC ain't bitting. Ha.
March 15, 2008 4:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent catch.
March 15, 2008 4:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think the most telling aspect of the story was how the DNC responded to the threats. When the guy demanded his money unless they did x, the DNC responded by giving back the guys donation. That is just plain awesome. I'm glad Howard Dean and the DNC have a backbone and told this supporter through actions to buzz off.
Take heed Hillary supporters that attempt to buy the campaign through donations, the DNC ain't bitting. Ha.
March 15, 2008 4:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, Greg, where is the McAuliffe angle? Did your source not mention that?
March 15, 2008 4:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
And make whatever the amount end in .01 (or .02, or .08) so he knows where it's coming from.
March 15, 2008 4:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am a Florida voter, a fifth-generation native Floridian, and a registered Democrat that has voted in every election since 1984. I voted for Hillary in the primary (although my wife, and my mother voted for Barack). If my vote is not counted (or is nullified by splitting the delegates) due to the actions of the DNC, I will leave the party, and certainly will not contribute any money to the party during the election. I'm certain that this will be a common response among Florida Democrats, after so many heart-breaking elections and so much incompetence and fraud. We are a massive voting block. We should have a far greater input in the course of the primaries than we do, so the actions of the Republican state legislature were not of great concern to most Floridians. Florida has been treated like a red-headed stepchild, and continue to be. My choice will be to remove myself from this treatment by becoming a registered Independent, even though it will prevent my input in the primary process. Enough is enough, I say, and there will be many more like me. Count our votes as they were delivered, or lose the support and money of many, many fine, intelligent, passionate, compassionate people.
March 15, 2008 4:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Isn't it disingenuous to keep referring to "the Republican state legislature" when the Democratic legislators were just as much behind the moving up of the primary? Pretending, yet again, that Clintonites are passive victims is really, really getting old.
March 15, 2008 5:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Your vote currently does not count because of your STATE committee. They were told what would happen if they moved the primary. You can't hold that against the National committee who have a duty and right to create and enforce a primary framework that they can administer and support.
That said, of course you should have the opportunity to cast a vote that counts in a fair contest. The primary should be re-run, but I don't see why the National committee would be expected to pay for that. The STATE committee should fund the do-over.
March 15, 2008 5:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
No wonder you guys have the Disneyland. Grow up, will ya ? And listen to your mom and wife, who seem to be far more smart.
March 15, 2008 7:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
I was a registered Democrat in Florida. In fact, I was involved in the DEC in one of the cities in FL. I know all about what's going on in FL because it happened right before I left for my home state of AL. What is so strange is Florida feels it has the right to be a power player in the elections ever since 2000, but Florida is still too out there to be a power player. The primaries and caucuses are based on historical and how the state voted in the last election. I'm sorry, FL, you carried Bush. So because of that, you get vote when the DNC says you can vote. It's the rules that were put in place a year and a half ago. I downloaded and printed off the delegation rules about 3 weeks ago just so I can figure this mess myself, and the DNC is right. MI and FL are wrong. You have to resubmit a plan. You have to get the plan approved. Once approved, then it goes from there. FL screwed up. MI screwed up, but now they want to be rewarded for their screw-up. Not happening. It has to be fair. It's the only way that it can be. This is a democracy. Not a dictatorship and if Hillary has her way, it has become a dictatorship. No one has any say anymore. Then what? We just bow down and become zombies. Because someone said it's right and the will of the people has spoken? No, it's not about what one person says. If people in FL and MI don't want to be disenfranchised, then start talking to your state leaders and tell them to come up with a plan that makes sure that every vote is counted. Not in this mock election that they held, but a new one where it is fair. Where every voice will be heard. and that people of MI and FL have actually been heard. That's what I think.
March 16, 2008 4:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
What more is he supposed to do? He gave them a chance to get their stuff together for a do-over. Michigan took him up on it; Florida decided to thumb their nose at him and hold out for the Jan. 29 results, then sicced the $63k "big" donors on him. Clearly, the ball is in the Florida delegation's court.
March 15, 2008 5:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Your petulant attitude is precisely what brought Florida to the situation it is now in.
March 15, 2008 5:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Iam tired of Florida...
March 15, 2008 5:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
amen. where's global warming and rising ocean levels when you need them.
March 15, 2008 5:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
barrystock,
We're sorry you feel that way, and we hate to lose any voter, but as far as I'm concerned you're a necessary casualty. In recent polling only 27% of Floridians want the Florida primary to count as-is.
I don't know why this is such a difficult thing to understand. Before any of the primaries took place, it was made absolutely clear to Florida that their votes would not count if they broke the rules. All of the candidates were on board with this, and signed pledges to that affect. That one of those candidates now wants to break that pledge is completely unconscionable.
To seat Florida's delegation would be a slap in the face to the 48 states that abided by the rules and held their contests accordingly. If you and your "massive voting block" can only participate in lop-sided contests that proclaim your own superiority over the contests of other states, of ththose willing to hold free and fair elections, then we are better off without you.
All the best to you in your independence.
March 15, 2008 5:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Clinton got just under half the popular vote in Fla, so if they split it 50/50, Barry should be able to go on feeling that his vote was counted, and come back into the fold for the November contest to beat McCain and end the war.3313433134
March 15, 2008 5:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Do you think Mr. Cejas would like to have a giant porkchop, covered in beans and rice, shoved down his whining maw?
March 15, 2008 5:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary has not been able to win with substance, experience, Bill, claims of victimization, race baiting, so now her surrogates begin the threats of destroying the Democratic party. This isn't about resolving Florida and Michigan, this is about undermining the democratic process and bullying the powers to ignore the primary elections and anoint Mrs. Bill Clinton the nominee. If their extortion works in overturning the decisions about not seating FL and MI, their demands will increase.... it will not be the end.
I hope Paul Cejas and Alan Patricof are subjected to unrelenting public ridicule and pressure. This is the Clinton way, big bucks rule. Enough of it, now!
March 15, 2008 5:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
As a nation, we should disenfrachise Floridians for any national election until they get their election processes in order. Florida election officials are corrupt and incompetent. They gave us George Bush, and now they want to give us Hillary Bush-Clinton. The citizens of Florida need to act to clean up the elections messes in their state before screwing up more national elections.
March 15, 2008 5:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
How exactly is Hillary going to explain this to her donors:
http://joemygod.blogspot.com/2008/03/hillary-in-da-house.html
Ouch.
March 15, 2008 6:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Great idea guys - just gave $25 to the DNC. Be sure to send them a message telling them what inspired you to donate.
Wouldn't it be interesting if Florida refused to revote and did not have their delegates counted but Michigan did do a revote and Obama won (he's tied in the polls).
How quickly do you think it would take Hillary and her team to come out and say that the Michigan recount should not count unless Florida was seated as is?
March 15, 2008 6:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Ouch."
Seriously. These Hillary songs and videos have convinced me of one thing: If she wins, America will officially become the land of the terminally unhip.
March 15, 2008 6:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
This suggests that Clinton's promise to get the lobbyists out of the White House is really a half truth. Her lobbyists will have the run of the house while those that oppose her won't. It reminds me of the kid on the block who was the last one picked for teams. So the kid began bringing a new baseball. And if he wasn't chosen he'd take his ball home with him.
This whole episode of vote/revote would have some validity if the timing wasn't so obviously partisan. Where were these money peddlers in the one year time frame between the decision not to follow the rules and Hillary's losses at the polls. If they had come at the DNC a year ago, they'd have had some credibility. Now they're just poor losers.
Time is running out on them. Their bargaining position is reduced as the clock ticks towards an inevitable Obama victory.
March 15, 2008 6:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wait, let me get this straight:
"Do as we command, and make less money from Obama."
Hmmm, an offer I can't refuse?
March 15, 2008 6:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
does anyone know who won the Iowa delegate show down today?
March 15, 2008 6:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Never mind, Chuck Todd over at First Read posted a few minutes ago that Obama picked up 7 delegates and Hillary may have lost 1.
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/15/773245.aspx
March 15, 2008 7:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for this, franklyn! I was curious about that, as well. Sounds like more Clinton spin, though.
March 15, 2008 8:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
They can take their ball and go home.
Obama beats McCain in the general without Florida - so there. (http://www.surveyusa.com/index.php/2008/03/06/electoral-math-as-of-030608-clinton-276-mccain-262/)
When either candidate secures the nomination, Florida and Michigan can seat their delegates and the can all vote or the winner. They should not get a say now. Try winning the election without the 48 states that did play by the rules.
March 15, 2008 7:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dear Spain,
Hey, remember Florida? I know it's been a while, but do you want it back? Just think it over, ok, and let us know. The beaches, Disneyworld... you'd love it. Really.
Thanks,
America
March 15, 2008 7:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
DONATE HERE TO THE DNC, to show that the people are watching and we don't want any back-door deals, nor do we want Dean to bend:
http://www.actblue.com/page/glindthegoodwitch
(I already donated $50.01, and everyone is being asked to add
.01 cents to your donation to show Dean that ordinary Americans are watching what goes on and that we support him in standing by the rules that EVERYONE CHOSE TO FOLLOW TILL NOW! Please post on other blogs and fwd this to everyone you know!
From the website:
I believe that the Democratic Party is stronger if the grassroots is strong. Let’s take our party back from the corporate and the big money interests that have been a destructive force in our country.
"Let’s send Howard Dean a little love.
Let’s replace the $168,500 in donations that disgruntled “fat cats” are threatening to take back from the DNC.
So click your heels together and repeat: There’s no place like the grassroots.”
March 15, 2008 7:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Tell these folks to take their money and f@#$%&* themselves. The plutocrat party is on the other side of the aisle. We already know that is where Clinton belongs.
March 15, 2008 7:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
I created a fundraising page at the DNC's website in relation to this, if anyone wants to donate:
Take Your Money Ball and Go Home!
March 15, 2008 8:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Hillary Clinton '08 - This year's Ralph Nader!"
March 15, 2008 8:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Florida doesn't matter? tell that to Al Gore. The shortsightedness of Obama-bots and the DNC is unbelievable. Can the DNC and the Obama campaign honestly believe that if he wins the nomination by denying the people in FL and MI a chance to have their voices heard will then develop collective amnesia? If they don't matter in March, then the shouldn't matter either in November.
And in terms of donations, if their votes don't matter then neither should their money.
March 15, 2008 8:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
If Al Gore said screw Florida and then he went and spent a lot of time in NH he would be our president right now. So yes Obama could lose Florida and he still end up kicking McCains ass. Once again its the states parties that did that to their voters not the DNC nor Obama.
March 15, 2008 9:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Funny I thought Obama supporters criticiZed Hillary's campaign for saying some states matter more than others. No the Obamabots say two states shouldn't matter at all.
I thought Obama supporters argued that we should vote for him because he is about what's principles rather than political expediency.
All this talk about Hillary doing anything to win even destroying the party and Obama and his supporters are doing the same thing while trying to claim the "moral" ground. Well guess what - no matter how you spin it there is nothing moral about denying people a voice in determining who will be the next President.
This is the new politics? Yawn. Seemes like the same old same old to me. I am a Clinton supporeter who used to have some respect for Obama. That is quickly evaporating the more apparent it becomes that the principles he espouses are "just words".
To all of the Obamabots who have nothing to contribute to the conversation other than insults and hatred for her alleged scheming and manipulation, guess what? You (and your candidate) have now become what you despise.
March 15, 2008 11:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
The general public in both of those states was well informed via newspapers and television that their votes wouldn't be counted. Subsequently, many voters stayed away from the polls. The only reason that all names were on the Florida ballots is because the deadline had passed for the removal of their names. There were other issues on the primary ballots (local politics), and many voters likely showed up to vote on those local issues. If they chose to mark a candidates name on those ballots, they should have known it wouldn't count for anything. MI and FL had since August 2007 to organize a new date for the Democratic primary. Since they waited until this late date, they are running into possibly unsurmountable obstacles. The local legislators are really the ones to blame.
March 15, 2008 9:40 PM | Reply | Permalink