Something tells me were going to be hearing a lot of "heart felt" apologies by all these Hillary surrogates this fall. She sure seems to have a lot of company on her "suicide" mission.

100 REASONS NOT TO VOTE FOR HILLARY CLINTON

I wonder if Jon Corzine (the multi-millionaire) would be willing consider the two states separately. FL is certainly fertile ground for his candidate, but MI looks like a tie. If FL can't get it's act together (I said that with a straight face, wow), they may be unable to do a re-vote and at least all candidates names were on their ballot, so they may have to go to the Credentials Committee. But if MI can get an actual primary together and Corzine pays for it, they may be out of the woods and we likely end up with a near 50/50 split. I predict FL will never get a re-vote off the ground and will have to go the credentials route.

You can not have Corzine and Rendell involved in any Primary funding. That would clearly be a conflict of interests, as they are both Clinton Activists.

It would actually be Clinton Campaign funds being diverted to control a State Primary. That stinks to high heavern.

It would be just a back door way for maxed out Clinton donors to give more money to her campaign.

Reject and Denounce it.

Let's get on with it. The sooner the better. I am tired of this whining by the clintons. If they don't do a revote, the clintons will be whining for years, even though a revote won't materially change the situation.

REVOTE NOW!!!!

If it's legally acceptable for private parties who have publicly endorsed a candidate to fund the elections, then go for it.

It'd be nice if some Obama supporters added to the pool, I guess, just to keep things equal.

Clinton defied her own party in 'running' in the MI and FL primaries.

She should not be allowed to benefit from that. Nor should she be given a loophole that lets donors punt more money to her. Nor should the Democratic Party be compelled to spend millions of dollars better spent on trying to defeat McCain.

Dean: Either divide the delegates in half and seat them, or stick to your guns, and DON'T seat them. But these ad hoc, eleventh hour, cost-incurring, party-dividing antics cannot be allowed to continue.

Isn't there something horribly disturbing about any candidate's money men financing a redo election to benefit their candidate? I thought Bloomberg would be the one to try and buy the election.

Second, why on Earth would any state party listen to the DNC going forward if Florida and Michigan are not punished for violating the party rules? 2012 primaries will probably be held in 2009 at this point.

This was the last left website on my bookmarks and it is now deleted because your anti Hillary bias is to much for this Edwards supporter. Your headlines read like a true OPM headline should, my hope is you all are happy at running off half your audience, half your activists, half your supporters. At least now there will be no dissent here in Obama land. Enjoy.

PS: I think the Headline should be : Instead of "What Ferraro Might Say" it should be " What a journalist might say". Of course you will not see one here, a true journalist that is .This place has turned into another Huffington " anti Hillary " Post. Obama drival all the time, nothing to outlandish to support Obama.

How can they do this? Michigan doesn’t even have party registration, so how the hell do they think a revote can be done fairly?
If they revote, it means that GOP voters in the state who have already voted, can now also have the chance to vote for who they want McCain to go up against in the general — and we all know they want Hillary. If they revote, it means that Democrats could very well be leaving the winner of our primary up to Limbaugh’s Dittoheads.
This would be criminal.

How many people bothered to show up and vote in the Michigan primary?

I certainly wouldn't have after I had been told by the Democratic National Committee that the VOTE WOULD NOT COUNT.

But if I HAD showed up to vote, Gretz, I wouldn't have been voting for Obama.

The fact that you think that McCain isn't 'such bad choice after all' if Hillary's campaign is not allowed to prevail makes it clear just how sharp the arrows in your quiver are.

So I will make the point plain: people who actually care about democracy, fairness and procedural integrity object to having the rules changed after the fact to the benefit of one candidate and the prejudice of others. It would be objectionable if done by ANYONE. It happens to have been done by the Clinton campaign which--sadly--has grown more distasteful on almost a daily basis.

I may be a Democrat (at the moment), but I have been a democrat my whole life. That will never change.

And it's as a democrat that I object to post facto rule changes and ones that are patently unfair.

I hope this is just another press release from the Clinton campaign's outpost in the office of Governor Granholm.

I hope nobody will have the cojones to ask me for a donation to pay for a primary that will be CONTROLLED BY A CLINTON ALLY.

The DNC should not agree to this. This is insane. Ten million? Do you suppose the Democratic party could use that kind of money, oh, say, in the general election?

Chris Dodd has the only fair and sane solution. Split the Michigan and Florida delegations 50-50 and seat them.

In Adult World, we call that Logical Consequences. Next time, follow the rules.