« Obama To Hillary: If We Debate McCain On "Experience," He Will Win | Home | Even If Hillary Got Michigan Revote, It Probably Wouldn't Affect Overall Contest Much »

PPP: North Carolina Primary A Dead Heat, Hillary Stronger Than Obama In Ohio

A new survey from Public Policy Polling (D) shows a close race in the North Carolina primary, a heavily African-American contest where Obama is seen as the favorite. Here are the numbers, compared to their last poll from two weeks ago:

Obama 44% (-3)
Clinton 43% (+0)

From the internals: Obama leads 72%-19% among black voters, while Hillary is ahead 56%-30% with whites. With Obama having started out as the favorite here, a potential loss would seriously damage his candidacy and boost Hillary's chance at the nomination.

A separate PPP poll also shows Hillary performing stronger than Obama in the general election for Ohio, giving fuel to the Hillary camp's argument that they're more electable in key big states:

Clinton (D) 45%, McCain (R) 44%
McCain (R) 49%, Obama (D) 41%

41 Comments

| Leave a comment

Thanks for sharing this, for whatever little a PPP poll is worth...

13% undecided? Are you kidding?

This poll is meaningless.

I really don't believe that the sky is falling and that he will lose NC. However, if he did, that case to the super delegates for Hillary would look much better. No way though after yesterday's speech plus two more today and tomorrow is he not going to bounce back in the polls. But man, people are fickle. Just think of the good that could happen in this country if the cable networks actually used their power constructively...

also in the poll (but overlooked by Eric):

A similar PPP poll for Florida released yesterday showed Hillary Clinton having trouble
with black voters and Barack Obama with difficulty shoring up the Democratic base.

The same trend shows itself in Ohio. Clinton leads McCain just 47-27 with the key
demographic of African American voters, while Obama pulls just 62% with respondents
who identified themselves as Democrats.

“Some of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama’s supporters dislike the other candidate so
much that at this point they’re not committing to voting for the eventual Democratic
nominee in the general election,” said Dean Debnam, President of Public Policy Polling.
“They’ll probably come around but a key factor here is whether Democrats end up
feeling that their nominee was chosen through a legitimate process. If they don’t it could
cause some folks to sit on their hands this fall,”
Debnam continued.
McCain has no such problems shoring up his base. He gets 88% of Republican votes
against Clinton
and 86% against Obama.

The point is, the longer these two go at it like they've been doing, the stronger McCain gets without having to so much as lift a finger. He can run a Rose Garden campaign from now until September. Do we want this?

user-pic

Eric, is this a joke? Seriously. Read this statement again:

With Obama having started out as the favorite here, a potential loss would seriously damage his candidacy and boost Hillary's chance at the nomination.

Now, did you write that after every state that Hillary started out as a favorite as and then lost? Because that would be...EVERY STATE HILLARY LOST.

user-pic

THANK YOU. Eric, that part of the post was complete bullshit. You have to know that. Plus, how would losing it "seriously damage him" if he's still going to be way ahead in delegates afterwards?

With every passing day, I'm shocked at how intellectually lazy the majority of this country has become. Just boggles my mind.

The way this is written is pretty suspect -- "a heavily African American contest." The point of the speech was to get beyond racializing everything. I don't know the percentages but to simplify this primary into an African American one sounds wrong to me.

I know I should be "beyond" racializing everything, but I think it is also important to point out just that NC has a more complex ethnic and racial make up that "just" white and african american. It also has a growing latino population (with raleigh-cary and charlotte both in the top 10 U.S. cities for latino population growth so far this decade), ditto for asian americans. NC also has a large native american population (by % of our total population, we seem to have the largest n-a pop on the east coast, at least). this is just a quick scan of some census stuff. nc is a "big state" that has just recently come to terms with the fact that it is a big state - and getting bigger, quickly.

a really good source of voter/demographic data on NC can be found at UNC's Center for the Study of the American South. another population that NC breeds in droves is academics. in some parts, you can't swing a cat without hitting a ph.d. it's kinda fun to try, though. :->

user-pic

Greg,

I think the flaw with this poll is that it is too far out to really read too much into it.

I would argue, however, that there are parts of North Carolina that is ripe Clinton territory. I never have thought (and still do not think)that Sen. Clinton will take North Carolina. I have also never thought that Sen. Obama will carry it by enormous margins (as he does in most of the 'Southern' states) Look at a map.

The districts in Georgia, Alabama, and Tennesse that did go for Sen. Clinton are districts that border North Carolina. Consider the support she is likely to receive in West Virginia and Kentucky, and the battle for North Carolina has a much difference shape. This is really going to be one of those states where, like it or not, it comes down to African American versus the country land.

Finally, PPP has actually had a very good track record this year. Mostly, they hosts general national polls. However, being based out of North Carolina, they do hold 'local' polls too, and were by far the closest to predict the outcome of the South Carolina primary.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_SC_Release_012608.pdf

"Finally, PPP has actually had a very good track record this year. Mostly, they hosts general national polls. "

Are you kidding me? PPP has an average error rate of 8.20 % this election cycle making them one of the worst pollsters.

user-pic

Those rankings are off-base. Most of the pollsters in the top ten have a small average error rate because they have done less polling. (Selzer? Mitchell? Research 2000?)

SurveyUSA has been spot on for most of the year, and ABC News and InsiderAdvantage have faired well, as well.

But PPP has performed better than pollsters giants Zogby, Rasmussen, ARG, CNN, Gallup, and CBS.

"Error rate" means errors per poll, silly, not the total number of polls they've made mistakes on.

user-pic

I know what Error rate means, Eliyah. What I said was that there are a handful of people who have a small error rating because they were very close on the one or two polls that they did. The sample size isn't large enough to justify giving SOME of them disproportionate praise.

PPP is saying Hillary wins the young vote and that the young vote is only going to be 11 percent. Well at my University i have seen many Obama supporters and NOT ONE Hillary supporter. There are like 100 colleges/universities in NC, i doubt it will be only 11 percent, and i highly doubt Hillary is going to win it.

Grrrreat!!

I just knew Hillary would move up in N.C.

Of course the black population which is large % in NC will probably not be disuaded by any of this hate talk by Obama's wife and pastor. But the rest of the people probably will turn on Obama.

Also, Hillary is proving more and more that she is the one who is electable in the general - not Obama who now obviously will lose the general election. His judgment has been put in question big time. Any man who would allow his children to be filled with hate, in a day and age when most young blacks in America know nothing about such hate, and yet he is allowing them to be infused with all this old hatred, such a man is seriously flawed.

Some have argued that maybe he joined that church only because it was the biggest one in Chicago and to prove his credentials as a real black, if he did that at the expense of his children, it is inexecusable.


Rae

Rae K, have you ever met Rev. Wright? Why are you qualified to judge the man based on a couple of 30-second clips from 40 YEARS of sermons? Have you bothered to listen to any of his other sermons or read about the good work he and his church have done for the people of Chicago's South Side? If you want to say those couple of clips are hate-filled, then that is more understandable (although I'd say they are more angry than hate-filled). But to say the man HIMSELF is hate-filled is a condemnation I don't think you are qualified to make.

The same goes for Michelle Obama. If you haven't met her, how are you sufficiently informed to judge her character?

If a few brief statements are how we are to judge people, then based on your comments on this page, one could fairly conclude that you are as hate-filled and racist as you accuse Rev. Wright of being.

Another pastor goes after Obama as a "long legged freak."

LOL!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khuu-RhOBDU

All children in the Trinity UCC are "filled with hate"

My Troll alarm just went off, big time.

NC should go to BO by 10+ points. Gotta be a registered Dem or Indy to vote in the primary; 20+ percent of voters are Indy and a big proportion of registered Dems are AA (30+? I’m too lazy and busy to check). If you vote early, you can register and vote at the same time. Obama’s sort of brierpatch, definitely.

He rolled in about 8PM last night. Check the polls in a week or so...

in a day and age when most young blacks in America know nothing about such hate

you are a fool

Things are fluid in this campaign, moreso than usual right now, with the Wright controversy, Obama speech, FLA & MI up in the air, etc. Also, no primaries for over a month...Polls mean very little at the moment. Prediction: Obama wins NC by about as much as Hillary will win PA....meaning basically a delegate wash. Underlying dynamics unchanged, Superdelegates not likely to move en masse to support the candidate trailing in states won, pledged delegates, and popular vote.

I'm open to a NC wager, Ombuds, what u think?

user-pic

I'm too scared to make a prediction on North Carolina other than to say that Barack Obama will win.

As I pointed out, it's not a 'clear' Obama state the way the other 'Southern' states are.

Also, as I said (and you pointed out, as well), there is a lot that can happen between now and May.

For example, what if Sen. Clinton won Pennsylvania by 15%? Certainly it could bump her numbers more so in North Carolina. What if she only lost by 4%?

What if race, somehow, because a big part of the narrative again.

Too much can happen. I will, however, make some guess: Barack Obama wins North Carolina by 7-9%

Bottom line, as has already been mentioned, this is a clear indication that hillary's kitchen sink, along with the complicity of the media to manipulate the masses, is hurting the party more than it's hurting Obama.

I have primary fatigue.
I have Clinton fatigue.
And I've totally had it with the media, which is responsible all of this.
It's the media that keeps this going.

user-pic

It's the same media that also made your candidate a celebrity first, a politician second.

Actually, it's you that sees him as a celebrity. Obamics think he's a politician, and personally I think Clinton is the one running mostly on celebrity.

But we digress.

So NC is an "African-American contest"? Interesting way to put it.

But today is "cherry-picked polls for Hillary day" (check your official media calendars - IT'S TRUE) so I'll give you a pass.

"The point is, the longer these two go at it like they've been doing, the stronger McCain gets without having to so much as lift a finger. He can run a Rose Garden campaign from now until September. Do we want this?"


As much as it seems a bad idea, from a practical point, would an Obama-Clinton ticket to settle this thing help?

You would then get both of their bases to come out in November.

I've heard the reasons against it, but if it were to work and increase numbers, isn't actually getting elected the most important thing?

If Obama picks Webb, he'll pick up some white males but might lose some embittered women.

"A separate PPP poll also shows Hillary performing stronger than Obama in the general election for Ohio, giving fuel to the Hillary camp's argument that they're more electable in key big states"

AARGH! NO IT DOESN'T! All it shows is that she beats Obama in those states. It has NOTHING to do with either candidate's GE performance against McCain!

Don't buy this crap. At this point we're only talking about nominability (yes, Bush has ruined me), not "electability."

An interesting tidbit: Clinton's overall numbers didn't increase from the last poll. So, this may suggest that Obama can regain the support he lost (expectedly) due to the bad press & conservative onslaught. Voters in N.C. may be "pausing" (moving temporarily to the undecided column) to reevaluate their choice to make sure they've made the right one. Those voters may ultimately break for Clinton, but the good news for the Obama camp is that they didn't automatically shift to Clinton.

Good catch. This is true in most cases where voters are reacting to recent events. It usually takes 2-3 days to show up in the polls. Current trends are reacting to the intense coverage of Wright since last Friday, and we won't see the response to Obama's big speech on race, or to the MI re-vote controversy, until at least Friday or Saturday.

Every time I see a statement like "a large proportion of Dems are AA", I wonder if alcoholism can really be so prevalent.

THEN I realize what that "AA" means.

I guess I'm just not racial enough for this game.

By the way, look at the top right corner of your screen: Clinton still loses to McCain in NH, CO and nationally.

Dammit, I misspoke about OH. More coffee...

user-pic

Hillary won't quit until she's destroyed him. Then she'll go on to lose against McCain.

Greg,

I'm too lazy to double-check, but my recollection is taht PPP's final polls have been as close or closer to the final outcome come as anybody's in the campaign.

nope. PPP is teh suck. You can see a comparative through 2/20 here, and then after that you'll have to do it yourself (realclearpolitics.com is good for a quick aggregate listing underneath the final results). For Ohio, SurveyUSA nailed it, and PPP was way off (most were). Texas is harder to lay claims to accuracy, because it's harder to say who "won" there - and are you polling for just the primary, or just the caucus, or the primary plus caucus, or what? At any rate, Zogby got closest to the primary spread, though not the totals. This seems to have been the first one SUSA comes close to really blowing. Unless they were polling the primarypluscaucus, in which case they got it right. Texas makes my head hurt.

Regardless, PPP still has no traction this season. They haven't made a good call yet, that I can see.

PPP has 65% of sample over age of 46, while Survey USA has 48% of sample over age of 50, and shows Obama with 9% lead. Not exaclty ccomparing apples to apples but pretty close. Admittedly survey usa is 7 days old and doesn't include Wright effect, but important to point out PPP is heavyv - too heavy in my opinion - on voters more supportive of Clinton.

I'm in NC, and the demographics here are far more complicated than "African-American" and "White."

Also, this poll is for shite. Unlike the SurveyUSA poll, PPP *way* oversamples in the 65+ range, esp. in comparison with NC's actual population. (You can't just look at the 45/50+. I believe the PPP has upwards of 20% in the 60+ column, though I may be remembering their previous NC poll). At any rate, PPP has not done particularly well this election cycle (nor has Rasmussen). As much as it might surprise everyone, Zogby has done better than either of those. SurveyUSA is still leading in overall polling cred, and they've got Obama with a comfortable lead in NC (although it's a smaller lead than in their round of polling, to be sure).

I don't think NC will be an easy state to predict, truth be told. There are a lot of smaller cleavages here than just male/female black/white. Throughout the state, we also have a large military presence, a very active academic culture, a growing "creative class" economy and a depressed base of under- and unemployed labor, and a much broader mix of races and ethnicities than the Southern stereotype of black/white would lead you to believe. But basketball is still our primary religion, so perhaps Obama and Clinton should consider scheduling a pick-up game in lieu of a debate. It would probably be at least as enlightening, with (I predict) the same outcome likely for either debate or game.

Another interesting difference between the PPP and SurveyUSA polls: PPP shows Kay Hagan kicking the pants off Jim Neal in the Senate race, while SurveyUSA has the advantage with Neal. Most voters in both polls remain "undecided," but SUSA has fewer undecideds. For those unfamiliar with the race, Neal is by far the more progressive candidate, while Kagan is the candidate that Schumer pushed into running after Neal openly admitted that he was gay and didn't think it should be a "big deal" in his bid to take Liddy Dole's seat in the fall. Neal has been doing a lot more netroots, grassroots campaigning (he's planning to travel to every NC county before the primary), while Hagan is basically working through the NC Dems political machinery, ads, and name recognition. I'm saying all this because I think the major disparity in the way these two candidates perform in the two polls speaks to the fact that two different sets of "likely voters" were being polled here. One set (PPP's) is the old school "likely voter" of 2004, and one set (SUSA's) is the "likely voter" of this election cycle. Just my opinion, tho...

Leave a comment

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address