Obama-Supporter Patrick Leahy Calls On Hillary To Drop Out Of Race
Senator Patrick Leahy becomes the first prominent supporter of Obama to explicitly call on Hillary to get out of the race in an interview with Vermont Public Radio:
"There is no way that Senator Clinton is going to win enough delegates to get the nomination. She ought to withdraw and she ought to be backing Senator Obama. Now, obviously that's a decision that only she can make. Frankly I feel that she would have a tremendous career in the Senate."
Just yesterday, Chris Dodd, also an Obama backer, said something similar, suggesting that party leaders should come together in April and force an end to this.
So the big question now is whether we're about to see the calls for Hillary to leave the race start snowballing -- and whether that will make any difference.
Advertisement

Comments (130)
Please check your spine at the door please, this is the US Senate. It's good practice for Hillary to start ignoring Leahy now - as President it's practically obligatory.
March 28, 2008 10:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sure, ignore them all. Richardson, Casey, Dodd, Leahy - they're all Judases.
By the end of this race, the Clintons will be ignoring everybody. They can then enjoy life in the private, paranoid corner they will share with a few dozen dead-enders like Carville, Chelsea and Krugman.
March 28, 2008 10:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
She sure has figured out how to ignore the voters. What with her, "Pledged delegates aren't really pledged," crap it is clear the only one she pays attention to is herself.
I just love when Hillary supporters acuse Obama of disenfrachising voters because of MI and FL. Hillary wants to disenfranchise ALL voters. Not to mention the Clinton shennanigans in Nevada...
March 28, 2008 10:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
For someone who ignores voters, she sure has a lot of them.
Here's a deal - how about you call Barry and say, "Hey Barry, get enough delegates to switch to you, and Hillary will drop out just as soon as you have a majority!!!"
Wouldn't that be a breakthrough strategy?
March 28, 2008 11:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
I realize you cannot accept reality that HRC does not have, and cannot obtain the support of a majority of Democratic voters.... Desidero, I realize you are a loyal HRC campaign lacky... the question is, When are you going to become a loyal American? When are you going to support a winner versus a loser? Or are you one of the HRC supporters who will vote for McCain?
March 28, 2008 11:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
Just Give Up. It's the Democratic way.
March 28, 2008 1:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is when you've lost. Or you can play it like Bush and declare you have a mandate when the supers have pushed you to the top over the will of the voters.
March 28, 2008 1:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Okay, deal. We'll take the White House, you'll piss and moan for 8 years, and we'll both be happy, otay?
March 28, 2008 10:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think we all have a pretty good idea by now of exactly who here will be pissing an moaning for the next eight years.. and probably well past that.
March 29, 2008 10:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Conversely: Ignore reality. It's the Democratic way.
Hmm.. somehow this seems rather appropriate of late.
March 29, 2008 10:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
I love how you Obambi-ites churl about whether delegates are "pledged" and demand that Clinton drop out now, while at the same time reveling in Ted Kennedy's endorsement and support (and that of his seriously retarded son Patrick)--which did, in fact, put St Obambi on the map. Ted Kennedy got to the New York Convention in 1980 literally ergs behind Carter and his first course of action was to demand getting rid of rule 6 which required pledged delegates to vote for their designated candidate. Only after he lost that vote did he gracelessly withdraw.
March 28, 2008 3:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Will it make a difference in her decision in the short-term? No.
Will it make a difference in the tone of media coverage? Perhaps. That's where things have taken a decidedly different path lately with the media finally catching on that she HAS NO CHANCE. The more we hear that she should drop out, the more we'll hear the media start to view her actions as the acts of desperations they are.
March 28, 2008 10:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Won't Howard Dean have more pull than Leahy?
"potential game-changer from CBS News and "The Early Show." Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean says he wants superdelegates to make a decision by JULY 1 -- the most specific he has been in his effort to prod the party to decide between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton before the Democratic National Convention in late August."
July 1 is long way away from "now".
March 28, 2008 10:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
I worry that these calls for Hillary's resignation will backfire. Hillary has consistently done well in the role of the beleaguered victim of the media and the party--as demonstrated in both NH and TX/OH.
March 28, 2008 10:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
I meant "concession" of course, not "resignation". I think that she should stay in the Senate. :)
March 28, 2008 10:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
I partly agree with Genghis. First, I'm not sure Dodd meant to say "April." He talks a lot about IN and NC in the transcript. Then he does say April, but in context, I suspect he meant early May.
However, it does seem that over the last week or so, the Obama campaign is gently pushing this story forward. Richardson, Leahy, Dodd, and Obama himself -- that's a pattern. My guess is that they don't seriously expect it to happen before PA, but want to keep it simmering as a question on cable news.
Forcing HRC out would backfire. And they can't do it anyway. But prompting a question on cable news doesn't backfire. It sets a frame of expectation, so that the question after each primary becomes "Is this enough for HRC to stay in?" I suspect that's what they're hoping to achieve.
March 28, 2008 11:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Alex, I think that's a wise point. And if they're effective in raising the question without seeming to create a Hillary pile-on, I think it's a good plan. That's a big "if" though, and it makes me nervous. That said, previous choices by the Obama campaign have made me nervous too, but those choices have generally borne out the intelligence of the campaign.
March 28, 2008 11:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Better than surrogates pushing her out would be more supers coming out for Obama.
If the ultra-cautious Bob Casey, Jr. can come out for Obama, what's the matter with the rest of them?
And seriously, supers, if you are listening, what have you got to lose? It's not like Hillary could win in Nov., anyway; the repubs will need to do no more than produce a dozen or so "valor theft" commercials featuring offended veterans of every age, shape and size, and play them on a loop with a McCain voice-over getting increasingly indignant.
C'mon, supers. Grow some stones and save the party. Bobby Casey is making you all look bad.
March 28, 2008 11:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
you're right again, Genghis! (i know you hate it when i say that!)
i saw howard dean on "morning joe" this morning and he said that no one should tell any candidate to drop out. at this point we have to let all the voters vote (all the way to P.R.) he also said that it is very important for the supporters of both candidates to feel like the race has been concluded in a way that was fair to everyone.
calls for hillary to drop out will energize her supporters. remember NH?
March 28, 2008 11:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Of course I'm right, kensdad. We've been over this. It's not even a question. It was only because you once suggested that I was not right that I temporarily banned any agreement between us. But now that that's over, you're welcome to affirm my veracity as often as you like. At this rate, you'll be off probation in no time. (I hope that you're not just sucking up for early release.)
March 28, 2008 12:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Answer to the "big question." Yes to the first part about the snowballing of supers asking the clintons to withdraw from the race and No to the second part. It will make no difference to the clintons.
March 28, 2008 10:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think for Senator Clinton to stay in this nomination any longer requires a "willful suspension of disbelief" on her behalf.
March 28, 2008 10:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good call, joeb.
March 28, 2008 10:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
They keep on coming!!
March 28, 2008 10:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
"I feel that she would have a tremendous career in the Senate"....hint hint from Leahy....drop out soon and that is true. Keep going and that will not be true.
March 28, 2008 10:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
What a wuss.
March 28, 2008 10:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
This will embolden others. Not sure how that genie gets put back in the bottle.
March 28, 2008 10:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Paging Joe Biden, Paging Joe Biden, please report to Pennsylvania.
March 28, 2008 10:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
As irrational and frustrating as it is, that is my concern too. And there's no sign she's not going to brazen it out and keep fighting kneecapping for all she's worth.
March 28, 2008 10:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Looks like Harry Reid's recent cryptic indication that something would be done to avoid a convention-floor battle did indeed reflect something going on. Pelosi, Reid, Casey, Leahy... looks like a pattern emerging to prevent civil war.
March 28, 2008 10:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Since when did the Clintons care anything about the Democratic Party? They'll just turn this around as Obama's people calling on an end to the democratic process while Hillary is committed to having every voice heard, or some such nonsense.
March 28, 2008 10:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Dodd, Leahy and Dean need to STFU and do their jobs.
Let the people vote and let their votes count so they will vote again in the general.
March 28, 2008 10:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
They are doing their jobs, trying their best to stop Hillary's kamikazi campaign from destroying the Party, not that Hillary cares about the Party. Hillary only cares about herself.
March 28, 2008 10:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
The voters in the party seem to be having a fine time voting for Hillary. The Independents and Republicans seem to be the ones "destroying the party" if you want to call it that.
March 28, 2008 11:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
please don't YOU go STFU on Sen. Leahy just because he endorsed Obama, do you even know who he is?
March 28, 2008 12:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
"I feel that she would have a tremendous career in the Senate"....hint hint from Leahy....drop out soon and that is true. Keep going and that will not be true.
That's how I read that, too.
I thought something was going on. I think I was right.
March 28, 2008 10:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree with Leahy except for this line: "Frankly I feel that she would have a tremendous career in the Senate."
Given the polling data showing the number of defections of supporters of each candidate if the other gets the nomination, like it or not, or even hate it or not, Obama needs Hillary to be the VP.
March 28, 2008 10:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Why would he invite her to be on the ticket when everyone is aware of her high negatives?
Is McCain asking Mitt the Flip to be veep?
March 28, 2008 10:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
He needs her family drama in the VP slot like he needs a case of AIDS.
March 28, 2008 10:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
That would be like stocking the Titanic with a few more anchors.
March 28, 2008 10:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Here is an idea for these spineless Senators.
Call for w and cheney to resign.
March 28, 2008 10:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ahhhh! I agree with you scalia. Amazing.
March 28, 2008 10:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
There's a mirror in your hand. What are you seeing that makes you look like you're going to puke?
March 28, 2008 10:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Just as soon as they make him pull out...cough...spittle... of Iraq, I mean.
March 28, 2008 11:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Snowball? Avalanche.
Or, maybe, Judas - icing on the wuss cake (seeing as how it's now, somehow, become impolitic to pick a side).
March 28, 2008 10:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's not impolitic to pick a side. Leahy has picked a side. It's just not Clinton's.
March 28, 2008 10:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
That tag line, like McCain himself, has an expired shelf life.
March 28, 2008 10:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
Huh? There must have been a glitch. I posted that on the other thread.
March 28, 2008 10:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
...and Hillary's recent concessional tone in affirming Obama and herself and asking her supporters not to vote for McCain... seems another indicator of party insider talk reaching her regarding a desire to resolve this before it gets uglier. I don't believe she came to that out of the goodness of her heart, but because someone has begun to give her realism about the consequences (for her career) of fomenting party civil war.
March 28, 2008 10:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
She's always said that, unlike say Edwards.
March 28, 2008 10:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
She has always said that in the same way that W has consistently said there is no connection between Sadam and OBL.
March 28, 2008 10:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
If the Clintons want to have their minions make threats...well, fire can be returned, you know.
The time window for a graceful exit is closing rapidly.
March 28, 2008 10:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
The more I think about this, the more I think that this has to play itself out until close to the end of the primary season. Clinton supporters will be angry and disaffected if it looks like the supers forced her out of the race early, as Obama supporters would if supers forced him out of the race. It doesn't matter that Clinton doesn't have a real shot. As long as there is a widespread perception that she still has a chance, her supporters will feel that she was forced out early. After PA, NC, IN, it should be pretty clear to everyone that Hillary cannot win the popular vote and cannot win the pledged delegates, and at that point, I think the superdelegates can safely end the race.
March 28, 2008 10:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
This may be a repost (stupid comment bugs)
I agree. No way Clinton drops out before NC and IN. Even then I think she will only do it if PA is loss or a tie. If she wins PA by 10 or more points, I think it's 50/50 that she will carry on to the convention.
March 28, 2008 10:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
How could she possibly stay in if she actually loses PA? I mean, personally, I don't think she should still be in now, but I thought it was at least sporting that the OH win and almost-TX win meant she could keep going for one more firewall. But make no mistake, this thing is basically single-elimination for her now. If she loses PA, she's d-o-n-e.
March 28, 2008 12:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
When Clinton withdraws from the campaign, I'm guessing following PA, she will urge her supporters to line up behind Obama's candidacy.
March 28, 2008 10:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
The problem that worrys me is that the Clintons will see any win in PA as reason to keep slogging it out. I think that's why you're seeing the supers start to come forward now.
I agree that Hillary's supporters might chaff a bit if she drops out sooner -but they can't have the argument both ways -either she's a strong and tenacious politician who decided to end her campaign when the writing was on the wall or a victim who was forced out by evil Obamabots. It doesn't work both ways (not that they won't try)
...and yes I am talking about her campaign in the past tense.
March 28, 2008 11:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's not really about Clinton herself, it's about her supporters. If her supporters realize that she can't win, they will be less disaffected than they would be if the supers manage to shut the race down before they realize that. Obviously, Clinton has a lot of influence with her supporters, but they are distinct, and it's the supporters that I'm concerned about.
March 28, 2008 11:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
i wish your fellow obama supporters on these comment threads would take your words to heart...
"hillary hate" and "drop out now" get them nothing except a bigger margin for hillary when she wins in PA... which then gives her momentum for IN (even i'm not hoping for a NC miracle.)
(this isn't a suck-up, is it?)
March 28, 2008 12:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, but c'mon -that's a HUGE"if". She's going to have to tell them that herself. Do you really think she's up to that with her track record?
March 28, 2008 5:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's the slugging that's Mrs. Clinton's problem. She doesn't have to slug it out. She could carry on with dignity, truthfulness, wisdom and aplomb and really throw the Obamanians a curve ball.
Why she chooses to be appositional when it's so clearly counterproductive is simply beyond me. There's nothing wrong with her brain, she can see that things go well for her when she behaves competent, bright and together.
What's with this? Is it just Penn and Bill and she's not willing to believe in her own wisdom? Doesn't she see that Obama's success is because he exudes a clear sense of believing in himself and the people?
This could be a real contest, rather than an ugly mud wrestle when only one person is slipping and sliding around in the mud, the other person standing at the edge and trying to answer hard questions from the bystanders.
March 28, 2008 1:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
No reason for an early pull-out by Clinton. This is a generational shift in power and if anyone thinks that's easy....think again. The party officials and elected politicians are having the ground shaken under them; long-time financial supporters and volunteers are also getting shaken up. All of that shaking results in some anger.
The challenge for Obama supporters--particularly the younger folks--is to continue to work hard for Obama's nomination; take the summer to rest up; enjoy the convention; and then work like he!! in the general election. And I mean hard work in the general. It would be great to have an overwhelming vote for Obama in the general instead of the JFK squeaker which was the last time we had a clear generational passing of power.
March 28, 2008 11:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'd love for Clinton to be Obama's running mate - I would. I would love to see all the acrimony ad bitterness fade.
But I know very well she won't do it. She should, but I honestly don't think she will, if he offers it to her. Not after she already offered him that spot.
March 28, 2008 10:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama might as well as abandon his bid if he is forced to take Hillary as Veep.
March 28, 2008 10:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Anyone would be a fool to ask her to be their running mate, because you get two for the price of one. That is no way to avoid distracting drama in your administraion.
March 28, 2008 10:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think you're right. I think there is zero chance that Clinton will be Obama's running mate.
Clinton will campaign for Obama and urge her supporters to vote for him.
March 28, 2008 10:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
I do not think Barack should get into bed with the Clintons. If he offers her VP and she accepts, he gets VP1--Hillary and VP2--Bill. If he wants to offer Hillary some other position, that's fine. Hell, he can offer Bill a bone as well for all I care. He should not, under any condition, offer her VP. The time for that has come and gone.
March 28, 2008 10:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's pretty easy for a President to marginalize a VP (Eisenhower/Nixon, Kennedy/Johnson, Bus/Quale) and even easier to marginalize the spouse. If Hillary were VP, I think Bill would get back to his Foundation work. He'd have a tiny staff and no security clearance. Not a great platform.
March 28, 2008 10:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
and at that point, I think the superdelegates can safely end the race.
I think that will happen - they are all talking the first of July for a finish for this - just prior to the convention to keep it from becoming a floor brawl that has people walking out.
And I think that's true -it needs to end before there is a big war on the floor of the convention. That does nothing but tear the party apart and insure the McCain is the next president.
March 28, 2008 10:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Clinton will stay in through Indiana at least.
Well, I think there is a major element of politics that none of you clods seem to understand. Let me explain it to you. There are the suckers i.e. you, the people who believe it's all about healthcare and grandma's social security or transforming Our Country. Then there are the interests, who will actually decide the agenda in the areas that concern them. And they will be involved more in the general election than now. But then there are the players, the couple of hundred people in each campaign who actually have responsibilities and are driving hard to win. And they are all expecting cushy and powerful DC jobs. They don't give a flying f*** about the common man, they're eyeing some appointed job at Treasury or Commerce. They've devoted a good chunk of their lives to getting that job, they're not easily going to let Clinton just give up the ghost, even if she wanted to.
Political campaigns are basically competing armies out for spoils. And certainly not the noble crusades you morons think they are.
March 28, 2008 10:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Whatever you say Lou.
March 28, 2008 10:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Totally overstated, but I agree with you conclusion:
Supers are going to Obama not because they necessarily believe he will be a better President, but because they believe he will win.
You want to be on the winning side if you're a politician.
If anything, your cynicism just reinforces Obama's position.
March 28, 2008 11:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
She's not going anywhere, she is delighted to be the center of attention . . .
March 28, 2008 10:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
My concern hasn't been about continuing the process, it's been the nastiness. I would love to see this go all the way to the convention, so long as neither side took jabs at the other on anything other than policy grounds. I think three more months of "we're both great candidates, but I'm better," would be fantastic. But all the kneecapping is waste.
My suggestion is that the higher lights of the party put together a "conditions" document on which they assert they'll withdraw their support from any campaign that crosses the line on race, gender, etc., etc. That is, when a candidate or a candidate's officials start attacking on personal, not policy, grounds. Basically, it'd be some sort of commitment to force Howard Wolfson to shut his bald face. And, really, wouldn't that make a better world for all of us?
March 28, 2008 10:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, I think there is a major element of politics that none of you clods seem to understand
You now, somehow I just never finish reading comments that start like this, but I've seen your opening sentence twice now.
You got your point across. You can stop posting the same comment now.
March 28, 2008 10:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
can Clinton do the gracious thing and drop out? it will be a test of her character ... sorry for the cynical take, but I predict "failure": she will only go when forced, and it does seem like the "forcing" has begun. Good. Some people are clueless and stubborn and just never take the hint.
March 28, 2008 10:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, hey, hey! Don't be hating on the Krugman! I say this as a serious Obama fan. He was the one solid voice we Bush derangement syndrome suffers could read in the MSM for years, and we owe him a debt of gratitude for that.
March 28, 2008 10:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
i would take it one step further... not only should dems not be hating on krugman, but they should be listening to him. he's earned his bonafides.
March 28, 2008 11:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hear, hear. I think that Dr Krugman is wrong about Obama's inferiority to Clinton, but everyone should be allowed to make a mistake now and again. He is right much more often than he is wrong, and when he is right he is brilliant. Meanwhile, the extent of his criticisms of Obama has been greatly exagerated among Obama supporters, in my humble opinion. In every case he has been very clear to point out that Obama is much, much better than any of the Republicans. To listen to Krugman's critics among Obama supporters, you might get the impression that he was induling in the "empty suit" meme, or some such, but in reality Krugman has been fairly clear that he thinks that Obama is a good candidate, just not as good as Edwards (his first choice) or Clinton (his second).
March 28, 2008 2:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
I would like to know what is going on. Leahy didn't even have the guts to ask AG Gonzales to quit this directly. How is it that he feels comfortable saying this? I am not addressing the merits of what he is saying - either you support it or not - I just wonder how it is that a spineless senator like Leahy has the guts to come out and saying someting so bold.
March 28, 2008 10:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Democrats have traditionally been better at whining about each other than confronting Republicans.
That's the prime reason Hillary-care failed in the first place - too many pompous Democratic Senators with rings to kiss more than anything. (Not that I particularly want to defend the solution offered at that time).
March 28, 2008 11:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Do anyone thinks she will listen? Yeah, just what I thought...she won't.
March 28, 2008 10:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, hey, hey! Don't be hating on the Krugman!
Word.
No kicking Krugman. He's entitled to his opinion and he has been as steadfast these last 8 years as we could ask for.
March 28, 2008 11:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Don't go there. Not even in your imagination.
Clintons is a magnet for MSM sniper fire.
Huge downside. No upside.
Only Bush and Cheney have higher negs.
She has way too many lies caught on tape.
This line spoken with such glib authority:
will "big-dog" her forever.
She is not a confirmed phony.
She'll be lucky to get reelected in the Senate.
March 28, 2008 11:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Do you think that Hillary will be in attendance on the eve of President Obama's first State of the Union Address? Now, there's a headline....
March 28, 2008 11:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary will see the light after she loses to Obama in Pennsylvania 51-49%.
You can take that to the bank.
March 28, 2008 11:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
That would be Bear, Stearns. Even Obama thinks Clinton will take PA and hopes to keep within 10% of her.
March 28, 2008 11:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
LOL
NC will be the deciding factor, it will go to Obama and seal his nomination.
March 28, 2008 11:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
THIS IS EXCELLENT NEWS!! FOR HILLARY!!!
March 28, 2008 11:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
YES IT IS!!!
March 28, 2008 11:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Welcome back idiotic!!!! I was starting to worry you had been taken out by stray sniper fire . . .
March 28, 2008 12:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
(Beware of imitations)
March 28, 2008 12:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
First, Leahy is relating what he thinks not calling for to step down-though I'm sure that is irrelevant for Clinton supporter purposes. Second, circumstances may force her to resign. That circumstance is money.
March 28, 2008 11:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ok Ok - I take it back about Clinton being Obama's running mate.
I have rethought in light of the overwhelming response!
LOL!
I just want to see us get back to the business of kicking Repug asses, hard. I'm so ready for that -
March 28, 2008 11:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Earth to Al Gore. Earth to Al Gore. It's time for you to weigh in now, too. Time for you to put an end to this.
March 28, 2008 11:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think Al's word would cut much ice with Hillary. Word has it that they don't like each other very much. Imagine what a coup it would be if she got him to endorse her! That would be a hell of a torpedo in the Good Ship Obama!
Mind you, I don't think it's likely, but sometimes my mind plays tricks on me in the wee hours....
March 28, 2008 11:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm quite certain they despise each other.
March 28, 2008 12:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Howard for VP
March 28, 2008 11:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is a mistake. Not a huge one, because the handwriting is on the wall. But Leahy will give Hillary something to rail against for a few days, which should lash her people to her just a little more. I actually think the longer this goes on, the stronger her position. Not for the nomination, but VP or some other juicy position. Go to other sites and observe what her fans are saying. With each passing day, they become more convinced Obama is somehow stealing the election. This group represents a giant gun aimed at the heart of the party, and only Hillary can get them to back down. The longer this thing goes on, the greater her power becomes over this bloc. I think Leahy and the others realize this. But it will take much more than a few comments on Vermont public radio to get her out. Unless Obama somehow beats her in Pa, they're going to have to get creative.
March 28, 2008 11:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree we need to play nice with the Clinton supporters (hell, I *used* to be one). But "With each passing day, they become more convinced Obama is somehow stealing the election"??? Puh-leez!
Why don't her female supporters give a fair listen to, oh, the highest ranking congresswoman and her comments this week? Obama won all those states fair and square.
March 28, 2008 12:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Call for w and cheney to resign.
Posted by gotalife
Exactly! If they'd just follow Hillary's lead on this... oh, wait...
March 28, 2008 11:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Those numbers reflect the increasing entrenchment as a result of this bitter campaign. The make-up of Clinton backers who claim they would not vote for Obama are traditional Dems, and they are less likely than the Obama supporters to defect to McCain. Even if that polling data was not merely a snapshot and could be accurately projected into the future Obama likely still not have her a his VP candidate--the risk of driving up his negatives, pushing away independents, and the fact that the you h