« Hillary Super-Delegates In Washington State Wavering | Home | Obama's Big Economic Speech Takes On Excessive Deregulation, Bush And McCain »
Obama: It Would Be "Extremely Helpful" For Nomination Race To Be Over Soon
Barack Obama said last night that it would be better for the potential Democratic nominee to be able to shift into the general election, instead of letting a divisive primary last for months longer.
"I think giving whoever the nominee is two or three months to pivot into the general election would be extremely helpful, instead of having this drag up to the convention," Obama told reporters on board his plane.
It's possibly the closest he has come to openly wishing Hillary Clinton would drop out of the race, and perhaps even a nod-and-wink appeal to uncommitted super-delegates who might prefer that the race be over sooner rather than later.
Advertisement















The other take is that maybe he is signaling the acceptance of a Super Delegate Primary.
March 27, 2008 9:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
Of course, I agree with Obama, but he shouldn't say this.
Let the supers work it out on there own, this just gives Hillary supporters ammunition: See! He wants Hillary to quit before PA! He's scared!
Obama will have plenty of time to beat McCain, even if this is decided at the convention.
March 27, 2008 9:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, yeah, he's scared. That's also why he's blocking revotes in FL and MI.
He doesn't want to see what happens when white people tell pollsters one thing, but do something dramatically different on election day. We haven't seen this yet with Obama (I think its called the "bradley effect"), but Wright may have created that situation for him.
It certainly will be interesting to see. But, no doubt, I'd be scared.
I have a feeling NC may decide this nomination.
March 27, 2008 9:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
LOL, he's not scared.
I just said he shouldn't SAY it, because people like you will think it.
If he was scared, he'd have Oprah come out. He's not scared.
March 27, 2008 10:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
The same North Carolina he leads by 20 points?
March 27, 2008 10:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ive seen more Anti Hillary bumper stickers here in NC (stuff like Anyone but Hillary) then i have seen pro Hillary. In fact ive only seen 1 pro Hillary sticker.
March 27, 2008 10:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ummm... Obama is ahead in North Carolina. I think Clinton lacks the party loyalty necessary for her to drop out after she loses. If she can't be the next president, she's intent to see that no Democrat is.
http://www.pollster.com/08-NC-Dem-Pres-Primary.php
March 27, 2008 10:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Blocking revotes in MI and Fla." Lol! I just love this mindless talking point.
Where did he acquire the power to stop the Michigan and Florida legislatures from passing laws and/or the state parties from submitting workable delegate selection plans to the DNC? Is this like a legal power granted to him by virture of his being the front runner by some previously unknown laws passed in those states? Or is it a superpower he acquired after he was bitten by a radioactive Diebold voting machine? Is it a magical power? Is he using a +4 Staff of Disenfranchisement against poor Hillary?
Look, I know you guys adore her and think she's only losing because the media are being mean to her and refusing to tell the TRUTH about what a FRAUD Obama is. I know you're all mad at him for being all uppity and not waiting his turn.
I know all that. But there comes a point when you have to ask yourself what end is being served when all of your hopes are pinned on mathematical and political occurances that are about as likely as hitting a Powerball ticket and prayers for some previously unforeseen deus ex machina that will descend and end his upstart candidacy once and for all.
He's beaten her. He beat her fair and square. She had a flawed, inflexible, and arrogant electoral plan, he identified the flaws in that plan early on and took advantage of them. She was unable to adapt and now she can't turn it around. The superdelegates are not going to overturn the results of the delegate race, Michigan and Florida have screwed themselves, and the voters in the ten remaining states are not going to give her the 70 - 30 victories in each and every congressional district that she has to have to pull even with him in the popular vote and delegate races.
All this pious talk about letting the voters in the remaining states be heard is pure hypocricy, coming, as it does, from the same lady who was on the Sunday shows back before Iowa telling everyone how it was all going to be over on Super Tuesday. Voters in the late states (like mine) are used to it being over by now. If we gave a damn about it, we'd lobby our legislatures to move up the primaries.
And, btw, if you think enough white Democrats in North Carolina are going to go for Hillary to give her an upset, you need to check into rehab. White North Carolina is the capital of I Hate Hillary Land. White women hate her. White men hate her. Even though the only white people who are still Democrats are liberals, they can't stand her and they don't even remember why anymore. They just do. (Except for the ones in Chapel Hill who used to defend her and have only come to hate her in the last couple of months.)
And, by a 9:1 margin, the black folk who used to like her hate her now too. North Carolinians, I dare say above voters all other states, know how the subtle appeal to white prejudice game is played. She can deny it all she wants, her supporters can say "Jesse Jackson Jr., Jesse Jackson, Jr." like a broken record, till the cows come home. No one's buying.
She's lost. The only question is whether you want to join her in her nihilistic quest to pull the Party down with her. If that's your bag, at least be honest about it.
March 27, 2008 11:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
I would never have put it quite so, shall we say, confrontationally myself, but I think that this is well said.
March 27, 2008 11:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, a little short of sleep and snappy, and my patience is a tad frayed today.
March 27, 2008 12:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Scared? At least you've dropped your pretense of just being an objective observer.
March 27, 2008 11:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe they asked him a direct question and he just answered what he would do ;-)
March 27, 2008 9:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Of course, if Obama gives up now that would also "be extremely helpful, instead of having this drag up to the convention." ;-)
March 27, 2008 9:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Indeed. Even though I am an Obama supporter, I was thinking the same thing. I want the race to end soon, but it is unreasonable to expect Clinton's people to see this race the same way that Obama supporters like myself see it. For better or worse, we will have to keep on in the present regime, knowing that we will win but unable quite yet to enjoy the fruits of victory.
March 27, 2008 10:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's obvious "a few months" means the summer, after the primaries are over.
He is saying: let everybody vote, then have the superdelegates decide. Having this drag through the summer when there are no primaries IS stupid.
March 27, 2008 11:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
Senator Obama,
Have you forgotten Puerto Rico?! The nomination can't be decided until ALL the people have spoken! Even those who can't vote in the general....
March 27, 2008 9:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
Just imagine what Clinton would be saying if their situations were reversed.
We already know her response to this of course: Obama wants to disenfranchise millions of voters.
Who, of course, don't matter because delegates are free to choose Clinton and not Obama, if they want. Not that they are saying anything about that, no need to sound the alarm.
But if a robot calls, press 1.
March 27, 2008 9:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
If the situation was reversed, the media would and the DNC would be talking about Hillary Clinton the nominee now.
I doubt Barack would stay in knowing that he can't win just to hurt the party.
Nor I doubt that the media would be on a frezny with pushing the losing candidate if the situation was reversed, or that Republicans of the like of Sean Hannity, Joe Scarborough and Rush Limbaugh would be helping Obama to tell other Republicans to vote Democrat so he can win.
There's a double standard here and race is definitely the issue.
March 27, 2008 10:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
I love that Barack can slip the knife in, twist, and smile the whole time....
March 27, 2008 9:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think somethings happening, maybe. There are those rumors floating around from the story in the Nevada paper that Harry Reid already said: something is being done to stop this. He said he'd spoken with Dean and Pelosi about it.
Since Pelosi released that very damaging letter from Clinton supporters, I think it's just about over.
Certainly it should be, because if she doesn't get out now, there's every chance her numbers will continue to slide and she'll get out looking worse than she does now. She's pissed off people who originally supported her - like Kevin Drum (for what that's worth - I mean, the only reason that matters is that it's an indication of what's going on.)
March 27, 2008 9:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
To or three months to pivot, instead of going into the convention. So he wants it over in May or June at the latest. This doesn't seem like "cutting anything short" to my untrained ears...
March 27, 2008 9:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed. It's clear, reading the original report on the NYT blog that he is referring to June, not now.
March 27, 2008 10:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
it would be "extremely helpful" ...
not that this will matter to Clinton. A year ago I was open to a Clinton candidacy; no more. And sad to say, I have become as rabid an opponent of hers as Limbaugh. I've been surprised by the gestalt shift, especially as I enthusiastically voted for her husband twice. And what now seems to me to be the obvious fact with respect to Clinton is that she will not do the right thing on her own. She will drag this out till the convention. Unless something/someone stops her. My guess is that Dean is wondering how to do just that. But I have my doubts that he'll be able to. Any ideas?
March 27, 2008 9:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Last time I checked, Limbaugh and Coulter both said they'd support Hillary over McCain. Of course, that was said before McCain had won the Republican nomination and was said in an attempt to sway Republicans towards Huckabee. Then there's Operation Chaos…
March 27, 2008 11:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, he's just putting it out there -- and I find it's a ballsy move on Obama's part.
March 27, 2008 9:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
So Obama is whining, what else is new
March 27, 2008 9:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Lalo,
Is not "whinning", is "winning".
Spell check alert!!
March 27, 2008 10:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ouch - instant karma, or just idiocy?
March 27, 2008 10:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Nah! I wouldn't call someone an idiot just because they can't spell. It happens in the best families.
-----
Hey, Foreigner, have you any voting rights? I mean, in the American Elections...
For those foreigners leaving in the US, not fun when one can't vote, but still pays taxes. (Ever heard of "Taxation without representation"? It ain't always fair...)
March 27, 2008 10:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
That should read "living in the US."
See? I told you, misspelling (and misspeaking) happen in the best families.
March 27, 2008 10:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Interesting. A whine about whining from a Clintonian.
March 27, 2008 10:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
What I would like to know, Lalo, is:
what is attractive to you about Mrs. Clinton?
How about a list of 8 items, each one in 5 words or fewer. I could use that about now.
March 27, 2008 10:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Don't know about Lalo, but for me:
1. her advocacy for children
2. her advocacy for women's rights
3. her fighting spirit
4. her pushing the boundaries of First Lady
5. her wonkiness (important to know what you're talking about)
6. her environmental record
7. her work as a Senator
8. her work on health care
This is a short list, but it's what you asked for.
March 27, 2008 10:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
A fine list, that. I would encourage all of my Obama supporting fellows to read it and recall that there are many good things to be said for Sen Clinton. Meanwhile, I would hope that my fellow democrats on the other side of this issue would take a deep breath and remember that there are many fine things to be said for Sen Obama. The reason that this is such a close contest is because they are both such good candidates.
March 27, 2008 11:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree with Obama. In fact, everyone agrees with Obama on this one and the MSM has been running this story point for over three weeks. While some say Obama should not say this because it gives ammunition to Hillary, he has to say this. It is a sign of true leadership to put the truth out on the table for all to see. Now Hillary has to counter with how the outcome will change if she continues. Don't hold your breath on this one.
March 27, 2008 9:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
I disagree with Eric's interpretation. The two to three month time frame (as he reported) would put the time for dropping out at after the June 10th date for the primaries to conclude, not now.
March 27, 2008 9:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Dear SCMadden;
I agree with you that Obama should be very careful about saying this, but there is another very critical reason why this needs to end ASAP. While I am confident that Obama can come from behind against McCain staring after the convention what he probably CANNOT do is spend enough time with the "down ticket" candidates.
If given proper time Obama potentially has the coat tails to have a filibuster proof senate and a veto proof congress.
I am hoping that some more big time party leaders come out and soon with pressure against Hillary. I realize that cannot happen until at least after Indiana, but there are a core group of Dem leaders whose public admonishments would cause Clinton to at least seriously consider with drawing.
At a minimum they need to make it clear that we will not tolerate Hillary pulling a coup with the Super Delegates.
March 27, 2008 9:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
two or three month, June, July, August. Thats 2-3 months, he didn't say end it before everyone votes but he is saying Hillary should step out since she lost.
March 27, 2008 10:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
People who get all worried when they see McCain has caught up with Barack, or McCain has taken the lead, should just chill. When Hillary drops out (or gets pushed out more likely) and the focus turns to Obama v's McCain, Barack is gonna wipe the floor with him. It's not going to be a matter of will Barack win, its going to be a matter of buy how much.
March 27, 2008 10:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
He doesn't want to see what happens when white people tell pollsters one thing, but do something dramatically different on election day. We haven't seen this yet with Obama (I think its called the "bradley effect"), but Wright may have created that situation for him.
If Wright did create such a situation, which I really doubt, because I don't think that many voters are paying that much attention to things right now, but if it did, then shame on everyone who was part of that really nasty damn racial smear campaign.
I had no idea the Clintons would do such a thing - but they did and I am forever disillusioned with the two of them.
March 27, 2008 10:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think he needs to be very careful not to outright call for her to step down. I'm sure the Clinton camp will see this statement as exactly that, and her campaign will no-doubt say so in a conference call soon. Obama doesn't need to fuel their self-righteousness.
March 27, 2008 10:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
Drop out and go back to the beach then.
Clinton lead on the economy but Obama is just getting to it because he cut and ran to the beach.
Lazy, day late, dollar short.
Let all Americans vote and let all their votes count before it is over.
March 27, 2008 10:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's right. Hillary's been very clear:
We need to let all the people vote so they can make their choice by select their delegates.
And the delegates they selected should ignore their choice and vote for Hillary.
See, isn't democracy simple?
March 27, 2008 10:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
...dollar short???
You haven't been paying attention to the campaigns have you?
Of the 3 remaining serious candidates, only one of them hasn't had to take out a loan to keep their struggling bid afloat.
Need a hint?
McCain took out a bank loan to keep him in the race.
Still stumped?
IllaryHay LintonCay lent herself $5 million to make up for less than stellar fund-raising.
Still no idea...
Barack Obama. You see, he brought in $55 million in February. That's more than Clinton and McCain together.
Day late and dollar short... my ass.
March 27, 2008 10:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
So Obama is whining, what else is new
You misspelled "winning."
"So Obama is winning, what else is new?"
March 27, 2008 10:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, it's hard to argue that he is wrong. It would be helpful for the nominee to have some time to define McCain and themselves, right?
But, I suspect that Hillary will somehow say it is unfair and play the victim.
I really don't think Hillary is going to stop ever. She will take it to the floor at the convention and fight it out.
March 27, 2008 10:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
I can picture that now, Hillary at the convention protesting this in some form of Women's Rights fashion, lalo, gotalife, and Weaver would be there with them holding picket signs.
March 27, 2008 10:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
I hope the dem establishment stops the clinton knee capping from continuing. As buchanan was smirking last night he pointed out that the b-movie actor took ford in 76 to the convention and heavily damaged the party for the general election, which of course ford lost. Then the b-movie actor wound up as president in 1980. He implied that that was the clinton strategy now, shooting for heavily damaging obama and winning in 2012. The problem with this is that she can't win in 2012 either.
Please supers step in and put a stop to this travesty of a campaign by the clintons.
March 27, 2008 10:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think this will end soon. There's really a passing of the guard here. Clinton does not recognize the legitimacy of Obama's results, and she does not want to go down.
The structure is not set up so that Obama's vote results bring finality. Rather, by design, the structure is set up so that the decision will be made by an unelected cadre in the event that there is no runaway winner.
March 27, 2008 10:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
of course he wants her drop out! he's scared!
March 27, 2008 10:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Poll results show that Hillary Rambo Clinton's positive ratings have fallen by 8% in just the past two weeks.
Those poll results "shed light on impact" Sinbad is having on Hillary!!!!!!
March 27, 2008 10:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Lazy, day late, dollar short.
Are all Clinton supporters as big racists as you are?
Goddamn - what has happened to liberal America? Of all the tactics the Clintons could have used.
And all their supporters around here just echo all of those carefully chosen code words: "lazy" "homophobic" "all flash, no substance."
The Clintons dragged this campaign into the gutter as a last ditch effort to get her nominated and it is one of the most disgusting displays I've ever seen. You are making your candidate look like the Grand Wizard of the KKK with this constant barrage of racial references. I really doubt the Clintons would appreciate your over the top characterizations, even though they've been seeding the landscape with their own veiled references.
You do know that you and the rest are partly responsible for her numbers falling with this nastiness, don't you?
March 27, 2008 10:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
Again, thanks. You don't know my nym because I'm a Nym Change Artist -- got too many bruises over there at Baby Blue. Brain blob, etc.
March 27, 2008 10:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
As anyone who reads this blog regularly knows, I am a Pod for Obama. I also have been upset as this campaign has became more and more embittered. I quite frankly have sometimes felt very, very angry at the Clinton campaign, mainly because of what I refer to the "race stuff." Still, I have friends and loved ones in the Clinton camp. I respect their judgment that the Senator also would make an excellent president. While I have thought (in moments of pique) about sitting this one out, of course I will vote for Senator Clinton if she gets the nod, as I have done so before as my Senator. Senator Clinton should be proud of the incredible support and loyalty of her people.
Still, it is time to wind this one down. In my opinion, Senator Clinton ended the campaign with the "Bosnia" lapse. One simply cannot imagine the campaign attack ads that will be run making use of the footage of her at the St. Patrick's Day speech describing her bravery under fire, next to the actual footage. Other examples of Senator Clinton's habit for embellishment are coming out -- e.g. Chelsea was jogging when the Towers were hit. I think this revelation is part of what is happening behind the scenes. Let's think about toning down the rhetoric as this thing unwinds. I really believe it's over and that Obama is the nominee.
March 27, 2008 10:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
OK:
Is there really a difference between saying that the Supers need to step in and decide this NOW (my opinion, not Obama's!) and Hillary's opinion that the Supers need to overide the pledged delegate total?
I'm curious. Why is one option "un-Democratic" while the other isn't?
Either we allow the Supers to decide or not. I say, let them decide now. End this thing, one way or the other.
March 27, 2008 10:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well its more like letting the supers commit now that they will not override the will of the people.
March 27, 2008 10:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Translation= it is not helpful for me to be steamrollered in Pennslyvania, please stop Hillary. Maybe if he could give a good speech the usual suspects would be swooning in the aisles.
In the end, he is looking for affirmative action by others to lift him up. Must be confusing internally.
March 27, 2008 10:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
Read the Times story. He's talking about June, not before PA.
March 27, 2008 11:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
I can only assume your handle ain't referring to the band...
March 27, 2008 11:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
. While I have thought (in moments of pique) about sitting this one out, of course I will vote for Senator Clinton if she gets the nod,
O hell yeah, so will I.
I'm utterly furious with her, but if she's the nominee, I'll put my personal feelings aside because I know very well she would be better for the country than John "I'm crazy as a shit house rat and I'll nuke Iran" McCain.
But I sure won't be happy about it and I will seriously question whether or not I will continue being a Democrat.
March 27, 2008 10:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Letting all the primaries run their course seems like a good idea because it allows the nominee to get his ground game in place and build support in all the states.
BUT...if Clinton spends the next couple of months trying to kneecap the nominee in an attempt to lose it for the Dems in November, then it should end ASAP.
March 27, 2008 10:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Again, thanks. You don't know my nym because I'm a Nym Change Artist -- got too many bruises over there at Baby Blue. Brain blob, etc
S'ok.
I appreciate it very much just the same.
Talk about bruised! LOL
but that's enough of that.
March 27, 2008 10:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think the racism is at TUCC!!! Ask the Reverend!!
March 27, 2008 10:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama is being honest and he is right. If this goes on to the convention then the nominee will have only 2 months to make their case against John McCain. That would be stupid. The general election needs to start NOW>
March 27, 2008 10:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think the racism is at TUCC!!! Ask the Reverend!!
O not this again.
The patented White Supremacist argument: They're discriminating against my white ass!
Could you be more absurd? How in the hell can white people be discriminated against in a society we formed, we wrote the rules for, and we have been in charge of for almost 300 years?
Aaaargh! How far the DLC wing of the party has fallen. My god.
March 27, 2008 10:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Affirmative action helps both women and minorities so your joke failed.
Unless you believe Hillary Clinton is a man.
March 27, 2008 10:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
(I originally posted this in the wrong thread...)
I'm sure Obama would love to move on with the general campaign but the primaries are far from over. While he and the media keep pushing for a quick end, Clinton was very clear last night that this is not over and that it will go to the convention if necessary. She will not stop short of victory. This is good for the party that cannot afford a candidate like Obama. Especially one that doesn't want to hear and respect all voters--such as the ones in Michigan and Florida.
Well, actually Obama would like to debate McCain the the Republican 527s that will not mince words about Obama's ties to corrupt slumlord Rezko, who also has ties to terrorists, nor to his ties to hate-America and racism. Even if the Democrats want to keep their head in the sand about Rev. Wright and Meeks, I'm sure the rest of the country will welcome and hear lots more. What about Obama's near complete lack of experience, his spoonfed "successes" in the Illinois Senate, his failed U.S. Senate committee roles, his attempts to take credit for work he did not do, Michelle's nearly 3x raise after Obama joined the Senate and Obama's attempt to secure funds for her employer, his flip-flops and lies (such as NAFTA).
You know, Obama can't handle this discussion with the Democratic party and has failed in big state primaries. Now he'd rather move on and face McCaim. Okay, join that discussion because it is likely the closest he'll get to the general election because he can engage that discussion with McCain, give McCain face time in the news, face justified criticism from both, and lose the nomination in the process as that is what Clinton is working on to win.
March 27, 2008 11:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
cross posting are we not?
Answer my question,
If Hillary Clinton dropped out of the race right now and endorsed Barack Obama's candidacy, would you support Obama?
March 27, 2008 11:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
He has already answered that question, many times over. The answer is no. He has repeatedly said that he would vote for McCain in such a circumstance.
March 27, 2008 11:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
Really how can anyone seriously think of voting for Obama when he has done evrything in his power to disenfranchise the voters in Florida and Michigan?
March 27, 2008 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
And again, I ask, from whence did he acquire this power he used to stop the Michigan and Florida legislatures from passing laws and/or the state parties from submitting workable delegate selection plans to the DNC? Is this like a legal power granted to him by virture of his being the front runner by some previously unknown laws passed in those states? Or is it a superpower he acquired after he was bitten by a radioactive Diebold voting machine? Is it a magical power? Is he using a +4 Staff of Disenfranchisement against poor Hillary?
Or, just possibly, could it be that the tendency of Hillary, her campaign and her supporters to blame everything that doesn't go the way they wanted it to on anyone but her is sympomatic of why she's lost this thing?
March 27, 2008 12:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is strangely appropriate that Mr Weaver's avatar picture is so fuzzy. It matches his logic.
March 27, 2008 11:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Of course, who am I to talk, given the blurriness of my own photo...
March 27, 2008 11:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
About the only coherent thing that I can take away from this screed is "She will not stop short of victory."
You got that right. She won't stop and the truth and be damned if it gets in her way. Same for those pledged delegates.
March 27, 2008 11:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Absurd? Call it what you will but the blue collar people will not put him in the White House. Listening to hate preached for 20 years on the white man is not an endearing trait to the "typical white person" in the heartland of this country.
March 27, 2008 11:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Listening to hate preached for 20 years on the white man"
prove it.
March 27, 2008 11:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama has stated on numerous occasions that he considers Rev. Jeremiah Wright to be like an uncle to him. He also indicates that he has been a long standing member of Trinity Church, having joined sometime in the early 90's.
oops, I guess not quite 20 years but one sermon of the hate is enough and then exposing your children is even more distrubing. Hate breeds hate.
March 27, 2008 1:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary is a liar, who can trust a liar! She needs to get out now for the good of the party! She will never be able to catch up with him in delegates and the Superdelegates SURELY is not going to go aginst the will of the voters!
She is pathetic! And she should have divorced Bill years ago! What kind of woman continues to stay married to a womanizing moron!
Hillary had a choice to divorce her husband but she chose to stay with a womanizer! And then she blamed the women Bill laid with! So pathetic!
March 27, 2008 11:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Actually I wonder how a man who would be President would stay married to the hateAmerica, blame all my problems on the whiteman, Rev Wright or remain married to hateAmerica, lousy mother, Michelle Obama.
March 27, 2008 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Eric, the Times story says "June" not "soon." Your headline is misleading.
March 27, 2008 11:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes. The headline is "iffy." Ain't it?
That would depend on what the meaning of "soon" and "June" are.
March 27, 2008 11:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
years on the white man is not an endearing trait to the "typical white person" in the heartland of this country
O go away - Democrats never use terms like "heartland."
You're a troll.
March 27, 2008 11:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
Saddle up, you old bag with no life.
March 27, 2008 11:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent Idea Obama. You should resign immediatly for disenfranchising the voters in Florida and Michigan.
Barack Obama was out there having his campaign argue that mail in voting has some type of impact that requires a Voting Rights Act review that could be troubling. That it will take more than a rubber stamp. Let's be clear, if the implication is this is just filling out a form, then no one would be bringing this up. Even the time frame is not a particular problem. No, Barack Obama is intimating that HE will raise a Voting Rights Act issue about mail in voting. The SAME Barack Obama who is co-sponsor of the Senate version of this bill, "The Universal Right To Vote By Mail Act", which declares that NOT ALLOWING mail in voting in every state (28 do through absentee balloting) disenfranchises voters, now opposes a mail in revote. I have heard of chutzpah, but this one takes the cake. Obama is disgraceful.
March 27, 2008 12:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
LOL, you keep repeating the same BS.
Obama did nothing to stop the Florida revote.
Karen Thurman, Democratic Party chair in Florida, announced the decision in an e-mail message Monday afternoon, saying thousands of people had responded negatively to her proposal for a vote-by-mail primary in early June.
"We spent the weekend reviewing your messages, and while your reasons vary widely, the consensus is clear: Florida doesn't want to vote again," she wrote. "So we won't. A party-run primary or caucus has been ruled out, and it's simply not possible for the state to hold another election, even if the Party were to pay for it."
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/03/17/florida_revote_plan_scuttled_m.html
I'd love to see you acknowledge this, and start blaming the Democrats of Florida, but I'm not holding my breath.
March 27, 2008 12:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Of course. The only worse thing he could have done would have been to peddle a sleaze story to HRC's mortal enemy the American Spectator. She would have really nailed him for that.
March 27, 2008 2:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
For those of you that only want to believe that Hillary lies.
http://www.freedomsenemies.com/_Obama/ObamaLies.htm
March 27, 2008 12:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Of course Mr. Obama would like Hillary to drop out now, with Pennsylvania coming in a few weeks. His supporters were saying the same thing in the lead-up to Texas and Ohio. Enormous pressure is being placed on Hillary to drop out of the race, and it will only increase as she approaches a number of primaries that could help her. I don't blame her for refusing to drop out. If she were way behind Obama, that would be a different matter, but she is not. What we are seeing is yet another attempt to stampede public opinion, party officials and superdelegates into calling for her capitulation. It didn't work before Texas/Ohio, and I hope it doesn't work now.
March 27, 2008 12:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
The story doesn't say NOW, it says JUNE.
March 27, 2008 1:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
As an Obama supporter, my message to him is this: "As soon as you fall behind by 700,000 votes and she takes the lead in pledged delegates, please, do the right thing and concede. It doesn't matter what Hillary would do; it doesn't matter that you really, really want to be president; the momentum, the probability, and reality is against you. Please, Barack, concede. Thank you."
March 27, 2008 3:41 PM | Reply | Permalink